Increased disability and MRI lesions after discontinuation of IFN-beta-1a in secondary progressive MS

Stopping Disease-Modifying Treatments in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies

BACKGROUND

The question of whether multiple sclerosis requires life-long disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) remains unanswered. Some studies suggest that older patients with stable disease may safely discontinue their DMTs, yet comprehensive evidence-based data are scarce and real-world studies have provided mixed results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the rate of disease reactivation and associated risk factors after discontinuation of DMTs in patients with multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

We searched scientific databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar) to identify real-world studies published until 31 July, 2023 that reported the number of patients who experienced relapses and/or disability accrual (outcomes of interest) following a therapy discontinuation longer than 12 months. Magnetic resonance activity and treatment re-start after DMT discontinuation were also considered as additional outcomes. We excluded studies where therapy discontinuation was explicitly related to an unintended or planned pregnancy or preceded a treatment switch. We ran random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup analyses and meta-regression models to provide pooled estimates of post-discontinuation relapse and disability events, and to identify their potential moderators (predictors).

RESULTS

After an independent screening, 22 articles met the eligibility criteria, yielding a pooled sample size of 2942 patients followed for 1-7 years after discontinuation (11,689 patient-years). The pooled rates for relapse and disability events were 6.7 and 5.8 per 100 patient-years, respectively. However, available data did not allow us to disentangle isolated disability accrual from relapse-associated worsening. Studies including older patients (β = -0.65, p = 0.006), patients with a longer exposure to DMTs (β = -2.22, p = 0.001) and patients with a longer period of disease stability (β = -2.74, p = 0.002) showed a lower risk of relapse events. According to meta-regression equations, the risk of relapse events after DMT discontinuation became negligible (arbitrarily set at < 1% per year) at approximately 60 years of age, and after either 10 years of DMT exposure, or 8 years of disease stability. Additional analyses showed pooled rates for magnetic resonance imaging activity and re-start events of 16.7 and 17.5 per 100 patient-years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our quantitative synthesis of real-world data, in the absence of definitive answers from clinical trials, DMT discontinuation appears feasible with a high degree of certainty in selected patients. While our findings are robust regarding relapse events, future efforts are warranted to determine if DMT discontinuation is associated with isolated disability accrual.

Disease activity after discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies in patients with multiple sclerosis in Argentina: data from the nationwide registry RelevarEM

INTRODUCTION

The discontinuation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is commonly seen in real-world settings due to several factors.

AREA COVER

The aim of this study is to describe the frequency of disease activity after discontinuation of DMTs in MS patients included in the Argentinean MS and NMOSD registry.

DISCUSION

Patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) and active secondary progressive MS (SPMS) were included based on the following criteria: they discontinued treatment for more than 6 months, they had been treated with a DMT for ≥2 years, and they had at least 6 months of follow-up in the registry after discontinuation. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Disease activity during follow-up was defined as the presence of a clinical relapse or a new magnetic resonance (MRI) lesion (either new lesions on T2-weighted sequence and/or contrast enhancement). Bivariate analysis was applied to identify clinical and demographic factors related to disease activity.

CONCLUSION

We included 377 patients (75.5% RRMS, 22.5% SPMS) who had discontinued DMTs. The mean (SD) follow-up after discontinuation was 15.7 (7.9) months. After discontinuation, the presence of relapse was detected in 18.8% and 3.5% in RRMS and SPMS, respectively; and new MRI activity in 22% and 3.5%, respectively. We found that higher risk of relapse and MRI activity was associated with younger age (p < 0.001), shorter disease duration (p < 0.001), and RRMS phenotype (p = 0.006). Males showed higher MRI activity (p 0.011). This study provides real-world data that can guide physicians when considering discontinuation of DMTs.

Discontinuation of disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis in patients aged over 50 with disease Inactivity

BACKGROUND

Treatments may become redundant in older patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Our aim was to explore whether stopping treatments might be possible in patients aged over 50 with disease inactivity.

METHODS

Patients over 50 were included from the population-based MS Lorraine registry if they had a relapsing-remitting course at onset and had experienced no relapse for ≥ 3 years. Patients who stopped treatments were defined as "stoppers", and the others as "stayers". The outcomes were the time to first relapse, to first disability progression, and to the occurrence of EDSS score of 6, assessed by multivariate analysis using a propensity score.

RESULTS

132 stoppers and 366 stayers had a median follow-up of 7 years. There was no difference in Log-rank tests for the times to first relapse (p = 0.61) and to first disability progression (p = 0.22). In Cox models, stopping treatments was not associated with an increased risk of relapse (adjusted Hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.92 [0.72-1.16; p = 0.47]) or of an increase in EDSS score (aHR = 0.89 [0.71-1.13; p = 0.34]). However, stopping was associated with a higher risk of occurrence of EDSS score of 6 (aHR = 3.29 [2.22-4.86; p < 0.0001]), with a significant difference for the time to occurrence of EDSS score of 6 (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that stopping injectable disease-modifying treatments, in patients over 50 with disease inactivity, is not associated with an increased risk of relapse or EDSS progression, but there might be a higher risk of reaching EDSS 6. These results have to be confirmed by interventional studies.

Intervening to reduce the risk of future disability from multiple sclerosis: are we there yet?

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) delay or may prevent the progression of patients with high-risk clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS), and from relapsing-remitting MS to secondary progressive MS. Current evidence on the effects of DMT on disability in MS is supported by the use of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), which is dominated by ambulation, and usually used as a secondary outcome measure. Less is known about the long-term effects of DMTs on other aspects of functional status, particularly cognition, which is a key determinant of ability to work. The time scale for measurements of disability is at most a few years, with scant data from more than 10 years of observation. Longer prospective follow-up of large numbers of patients with CIS is needed to determine whether early intervention with a DMT influences long-term disease progression. Finally, the emergence of the radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) as a clinical entity has shifted the debate about when to intervene to an even earlier time frame. Balancing the significant side-effects associated with DMT in general and the expected outcome of pharmacologic intervention is increasingly problematic for managing patients with uncertain prognosis, as many patients may have low-risk CIS, benign MS or patients with RIS only. Preventing long-term disability in MS should be recognised more clearly as an important outcome in its own right, with disability measured more consistently with more sensitive instruments beyond the use of the EDSS.

Stopping Disease-Modifying Therapy in Nonrelapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Experience from a Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Current disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are of benefit only in people with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). Thus, safely stopping DMTs in people with secondary progressive MS may be possible.

METHODS

Two groups of patients with MS were studied. Group A consisted of 77 patients with secondary progressive MS and no evidence of acute central nervous system inflammation for 2 to 20 years. These patients were advised to stop DMTs. Group B consisted of 17 individuals with RMS who stopped DMTs on their own. Both groups were evaluated at treatment cessation and for a minimum of 1 year thereafter. Multiple variables were assessed to determine those that predicted recurrent acute disease.

RESULTS

Nine patients in group A (11.7%) and ten patients in group B (58.8%) had recurrent acute disease, almost always within 1 to 2 years of stopping treatment. The only variable of significance in group A distinguishing stable and relapsing patients was age (P = .0003), with relapsing patients being younger. Group B patients were younger and had significantly lower Expanded Disability Status Scale scores than group A, with no significant differences in age between relapsed and stable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DMTs can be stopped safely in older patients with MS (≥7 decades) with no evidence of acute disease for 2 years or longer, with an almost 90% probability of remaining free of acute recurrence. The high proportion of untreated patients with RMS experiencing recurrent acute disease is consistent with published data.

Discontinuing disease-modifying therapy in MS after a prolonged relapse-free period: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of injectable disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) after a long period of relapse freedom is frequently considered, but data on post-cessation disease course are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To compare time to first relapse and disability progression among 'DMT stoppers' and propensity-score matched 'DMT stayers' in the MSBase Registry; (2) To identify predictors of time to first relapse and disability progression in DMT stoppers.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria for DMT stoppers were: age ≥18 years; no relapses for ≥5 years at DMT discontinuation; follow-up for ≥3 years after stopping DMT; not restarting DMT for ≥3 months after discontinuation. DMT stayers were required to have no relapses for ≥5 years at baseline, and were propensity-score matched to stoppers for age, sex, disability (Expanded Disability Status Score), disease duration and time on treatment. Relapse and disability progression events in matched stoppers and stayers were compared using a marginal Cox model. Predictors of first relapse and disability progression among DMT stoppers were investigated using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Time to first relapse among 485 DMT stoppers and 854 stayers was similar (adjusted HR, aHR=1.07, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.37; p=0.584), while time to confirmed disability progression was significantly shorter among DMT stoppers than stayers (aHR=1.47, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.84, p=0.001). The difference in hazards of progression was due mainly to patients who had not experienced disability progression in the prebaseline treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MS who discontinued injectable DMT after a long period of relapse freedom had a similar relapse rate as propensity score-matched patients who continued on DMT, but higher hazard for disability progression.

Interferon beta for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Therapy with either recombinant beta-1a or beta-1b interferons (IFNs) is worldwide approved for Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). A major unanswered question is whether this treatment is able to safely reverse or retard the progressive phase of the disease.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to verify whether IFNs treatment in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) is more effective than placebo in reducing the number of patients who experience disability progression.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Multiple Sclerosis Group's Trials Register (1995 to 15 February 2011), the reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings. Regulatory agencies were used as additional sources of information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised, double or single blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of IFNs versus placebo in SPMS patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed all reports retrieved from the search. They independently extracted clinical, safety and MRI data, using a predefined data extraction form, resolving disagreements after discussion with a third reviewer. Risk of bias was evaluated to assess the quality of the studies. Treatment effect was measured using Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the binary outcomes and Standard Mean Difference with 95% CI for the continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Five RCTs met the inclusion criteria, from which 3122 (1829 IFN and 1293 placebo) treated patients contributed to the analysis. Included population was heterogeneous in terms of baseline clinical characteristics of the disease, in particular the percentage of patients affected by secondary progression with superimposed relapse ranging from 72% to 44%. IFN beta 1a and 1b did not decrease the risk of progression sustained at 6 months (RR, 95% CI: 0.98, [0.82-1.16]) after three years of treatment. A significant decrease of the risk of progression sustained at 3 months (RR, 95% CI: 0.88 [0.80, 0.97]) and of the risk of developing new relapses at three years (RR 0.91, [0.84-0.97]) were found. The risk of developing new active brain lesions decreased over time but this data was obtained from single studies on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), performed in subgroups of patients; in spite of no effect on progression, the radiological data supported an effect on MRI parameters. The safety profile reflects what is commonly reported in MS IFN-treated patients.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Well designed RCTs, evaluating a high number of patients were included in the review. Recombinant IFN beta does not prevent the development of permanent physical disability in SPMS. We were unable to verify the effect on cognitive function for the lack of comparable data. This treatment significantly reduces the risk of relapse and of short -term relapse-related disability.Overall, these results show that IFNs' anti-inflammatory effect is unable to retard progression, when established. In the future, no new RCTs for IFNs versus placebo in SPMS will probably be undertaken, because research is now focusing on innovative drugs. We believe that this review gives conclusive evidence on the clinical efficacy of IFNs versus placebo in SPMS.

Discontinuation of interferon beta therapy in multiple sclerosis patients with high pre-treatment disease activity leads to prompt return to previous disease activity

BACKGROUND

A recommendation for the duration of interferon beta (IFNβ) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with a good response to this therapy has not been defined. Very limited data exist with regard to the effect of IFNβ discontinuation on the subsequent course of MS.

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinical activity in MS relapsing-remitting (MS RR) patients with high pre-treatment activity who discontinued IFNβ treatment after approximately 2 years of treatment.

METHODS

We determined the relapse rate and disability progression in 43 patients who discontinued IFNβ after ~25 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Within ~34 months post-treatment 28 patients (65%) experienced at least one severe relapse, and 8 MS patients experienced a relapse within 30 days post IFNβ discontinuation. Disability progression measured by EDSS in the post-treatment period was 1.45±0.8 points per patient.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that IFNβ did not induce a prolonged remission in MS patients and that disease activity returned to the previous rate within a short time after treatment cessation. Discontinuation of IFNβ treatment in high activity pre-treatment MS patients with good response to this therapy is not recommended.

High-dose, high-frequency recombinant interferon beta-1a in the treatment of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

There is at present no cure for multiple sclerosis (MS), and existing therapies are designed primarily to prevent lesion formation, decrease the rate and severity of relapses and delay the resulting disability by reducing levels of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to assess the treatment of relapsing MS with particular focus on subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon (IFN) beta-1a.

METHOD

The literature on IFN beta-1a therapy of MS was reviewed based on a PubMed search (English-language publications from 1990) including its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy in relapsing MS as shown in placebo-controlled studies and in comparative trials, efficacy in secondary progressive MS, safety and tolerability, and the impact of neutralizing antibodies.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests that high-dose, high-frequency s.c. IFN beta-1a offers an effective option for treating patients with relapsing MS, with proven long-term safety and tolerability, and has a favourable benefit-to-risk ratio compared with other forms of IFN beta.

Disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis: current and future aspects

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the human CNS, affecting an estimated 2.5 million people in the world. Until the 1990s, treatment was mainly symptomatic, but a new era began with the introduction of disease-modifying therapy that seems to alter the natural course of MS. Current drugs include three interferons (IFNs): IFN-beta1a (Avonex intramuscular; Biogen, Cambridge, USA; Rebif subcutaneous; Serono, Geneva, Switzerland), IFN-beta1b (Betaseron subcutaneous; Schering, Berlin, Germany) and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone subcutaneous; Teva, Petach Tikva, Israel). Ongoing research targeting a variety of mechanisms and processes means there is much promise for the future treatment of MS.

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: current knowledge and future challenges

The secondary progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (MS), which is characterised by a steady accrual of fixed disability after an initial relapsing remitting course, is not clearly understood. Although there is no consensus on the mechanisms underlying such a transition to the progressive phase, epidemiological and neuroimaging studies indicate that it is probably driven by the high prevalence of neurodegenerative compared with inflammatory pathological changes. This notion is lent support by the limited efficacy of available immunomodulating and immunosuppressive treatment strategies, which seems to be further decreased in the late stages of secondary progressive MS. No established clinical or paraclinical predictors of the transition from relapsing remitting to secondary progressive MS have been described. However, the use of quantitative MRI-derived measures is warranted to monitor natural history studies and therapeutic trials of secondary progressive MS with increased reliability. In view of the small effects of immunomodulating and immunosuppressive treatments in preventing the transition to secondary progression, the development of treatments promoting neuroaxonal repair remains an important goal in this disease.