Outcome of lamotrigine treatment in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Perampanel for the treatment of patients with myoclonic seizures in clinical practice: Evidence from the PERMIT study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of perampanel (PER) in treating myoclonic seizures in clinical practice, using data from the PERaMpanel pooled analysIs of effecTiveness and tolerability (PERMIT) study.

METHODS

PERMIT was a pooled analysis of 44 real-world studies from 17 countries, in which patients with focal and generalised epilepsy were treated with PER. This post-hoc analysis included patients with myoclonic seizures at baseline. Retention and effectiveness were assessed after 3, 6, and 12 months; effectiveness was additionally assessed at the last visit (last observation carried forward). Effectiveness assessments included responder rate (≥50% seizure frequency reduction from baseline) and seizure freedom rate (no seizures since at least the prior visit). Safety and tolerability were assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) and discontinuation due to AEs.

RESULTS

156 patients had myoclonic seizures (59.0% female; mean age, 32.1 years; idiopathic generalised epilepsy, 89.1%; Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy, 63.1%; monthly median myoclonic seizure frequency [interquartile range], 1.7 [1.0-10.0]; mean [standard deviation] prior antiseizure medications, 2.9 [2.6]). Retention was assessed for 133 patients (mean time, 12.1 months), effectiveness for 142, and safety/tolerability for 156. Responder and seizure freedom rates were, respectively, 89.5% and 68.8% at 12 months, and 85.9% and 63.4% at the last visit. Incidence of AEs was 46.8%, the most frequent being dizziness/vertigo (19.2%), irritability (18.6%) and somnolence (9.6%). AEs led to discontinuation of 14.0% of patients over 12 months.

CONCLUSION

PER was associated with reduction in myoclonic seizure frequency in patients with myoclonic seizures treated in everyday clinical practice.

Epilepsy Syndromes: Current Classifications and Future Directions

This review describes the clinical presentations and treatment options for commonly recognized epilepsy syndromes in the pediatric age group, based on the 2017 International League Against Epilepsy classification. Structural epilepsies that are amenable to surgical intervention are discussed. Lastly, emerging technologies are reviewed that are expanding our knowledge of underlying epilepsy pathologies and will guide future syndromic classification systems including genetic testing and tissue repositories.

Myoclonus- A Review

Myoclonus is a hyperkinetic movement disorder characterized by a sudden, brief, involuntary jerk. Positive myoclonus is caused by abrupt muscle contractions, while negative myoclonus by sudden cessation of ongoing muscular contractions. Myoclonus can be classified in various ways according to body distribution, relation to activity, neurophysiology, and etiology. The neurophysiological classification of myoclonus by means of electrophysiological tests is helpful in guiding the best therapeutic strategy. Given the diverse etiologies of myoclonus, a thorough history and detailed physical examination are key to the evaluation of myoclonus. These along with basic laboratory testing and neurophysiological studies help in narrowing down the clinical possibilities. Though symptomatic treatment is required in the majority of cases, treatment of the underlying etiology should be the primary aim whenever possible. Symptomatic treatment is often not satisfactory, and a combination of different drugs is often required to control the myoclonus. This review addresses the etiology, classification, clinical approach, and management of myoclonus.

Alternatives to valproate in girls and women of childbearing potential with Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies: state of the art and guidance for the clinician proposed by the Epilepsy and Gender Commission of the Italian League Against Epilepsy (LICE)

Following recent European Medication Agency restrictions on valproate (VPA) use in girls and women of childbearing potential (WOCP), the Commission on Epilepsy and Gender of the Italian League against Epilepsy integrated current literature and legislative data in order to provide clinicians with guidance on antiseizure medication (ASM) prescription for Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies (IGEs) in this population, avoiding VPA. We reviewed the updated literature on ASMs and examined the teratogenicity of those showing efficacy in IGEs. For all relevant ASMs, we considered the indications for use and the pregnancy and contraception-related recommendations given in the Italian Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and on the websites of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and other European Union (EU) countries' regulatory agencies. With the exception of absence seizures, the literature lacks high quality studies on ASMs in IGEs. In girls and WOCP, levetiracetam and lamotrigine should be considered the first-choice drugs in Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Alone and in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy, lamotrigine in Juvenile Absence Epilepsy, and ethosuximide in Childhood Absence Epilepsy. Although supported by the literature, several ASMs are off label, contraindicated or burdened by special warnings in pregnancy. Some discrepancies emerged between the various SmPC warnings for different brands of the same active principle. We provided a therapeutic algorithm for each IGE syndrome and highlighted the need for revised prescription rules, consistent with the latest literature data, uniformity of SmPC warnings for the same active principle, and more data on the efficacy of new ASMs in IGEs and their safety in pregnancy.

Treatment of Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy in Patients of Child-Bearing Potential

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is both a frequent and a very characteristic epileptic syndrome with female preponderance. Treatment of JME in women of childbearing potential must consider multiple factors such as desire for pregnancy, use of contraception, seizure control and previously used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Approximately 85% of cases are well controlled with valproate, which remains the reference AED in JME but is nowadays considered unsafe for the expecting mother and her fetus. The prescription of valproate is now severely restricted in women of childbearing potential but may still be considered, at the lowest possible dose and when pregnancies can be reliably planned, with temporary alternatives to valproate prescribed before fertilization. Alternatives have emerged, especially lamotrigine and levetiracetam, but also topiramate, zonisamide, and recently perampanel, but none of these AEDs can be considered fully safe in the context of pregnancy. In special settings, benzodiazepines and barbiturates may be useful. In some cases, combination therapy, especially lamotrigine and levetiracetam, may be useful or even required. However, lamotrigine may have the potential to aggravate JME, with promyoclonic effects. Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin must be avoided. Valproate, levetiracetam, zonisamide, topiramate if the daily dose is ≤ 200 mg and perampanel if the daily dose is ≤ 10 mg do not affect combined hormonal contraception. Lamotrigine ≥ 300 mg/day has been shown to decrease levonorgestrel levels by 20% but does not compromise combined hormonal contraception. Patients with JME taking oral contraceptive should be counselled on the fact that the estrogenic component can reduce concentrations of lamotrigine by over 50%, putting patients at risk of increased seizures. Pregnancy is a therapeutic challenge, and the risk/benefit ratio for the mother and fetus must be considered when choosing the appropriate drug. Lamotrigine (< 325 mg daily in the European Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pregnancy) and levetiracetam seem to be comparatively safer in pregnancy than other AEDs, especially topiramate and valproate. Plasma concentration of lamotrigine and levetiracetam decreases significantly during pregnancy, and dosage adjustments may be necessary. With persisting generalized tonic-clonic seizures, the combination of lamotrigine and levetiracetam offer the chance of seizure control and lesser risks of major congenital malformations. The risk of malformation increases when valproate or topiramate are included in the drug combination. In one study, the relative risk of autism and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) in children born to women with epilepsy (WWE) treated with valproate were, respectively, 5.2 for autism and 2.9 for ASD versus 2.12 for autism and 1.6 for ASD in WWE not treated with valproate. More studies are needed to assess the risk of autism with AEDs other than valproate. The current knowledge is that the risk appears to be double that in the general population. In patients with JME, valproate remains an essential and life-changing agent. The consequences of a lifetime of poorly controlled epilepsy need to be balanced against the teratogenic risks of valproate during limited times in a woman's life. The management of JME in WWE should include lifestyle interventions, with avoidance of sleep deprivation, and planned pregnancy.

Management of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is a common form of epilepsy and a fairly lifelong disorder that may significantly lower a patient's expectations and potential for a full life. Luckily, it is also a highly treatable disorder, and up to 85% of patients with JME will enjoy satisfactory seizure control. Among anticonvulsants, valproate still stands out as the most efficacious drug, but may be poorly tolerated by some, and is considered unsafe for the fetuses of pregnant women. Alternatives have emerged in recent years, especially levetiracetam, but also topiramate, zonisamide or lamotrigine. In some cases, combination therapy may be useful or even required. One should not forget the potential aggravation induced not only by some commonly used anticonvulsants, especially carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, but also, in some patients, by lamotrigine. In special settings, older drugs like benzodiazepines and barbiturates may be useful. But the management of JME should also include intervention in lifestyle, with strict avoidance of sleep deprivation and the management of copathologies, including the cognitive and psychiatric problems that are often encountered. With adequate management, there will only remain a small proportion of patients with uncontrolled epilepsy and all of its related problems. Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is a condition in which the clinician has a fair chance of significantly helping the patient with medication and counseling.

Lifetime prognosis of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is among the most common types of genetic epilepsies, displaying a good prognosis when treated with appropriate drugs, but with a well-known tendency to relapse after withdrawal. The majority of patients with JME have continuing seizures after a follow-up of two decades. However, 17% are able to discontinue medication and remain seizure-free thereafter. Clinicians should remember that there is a small but still considerable subgroup of JME patients whose seizures are difficult to treat before informing patients with newly-diagnosed JME about their "benign" prognosis. This resistant course is not fully explained, though there are many suggested factors. The dominating myoclonic seizures disappear or diminish in severity in the fourth decade of life. Despite the favorable seizure outcome in most of the cases, 3/4 of patients with JME have at least one major unfavorable social outcome. The possible subsyndromes of JME, its genetic background, and its pathophysiological and neuroimaging correlates should be further investigated.

[Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy]

BACKGROUND

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) is a generalised epilepsy with seizure onset in youth. The aim of this review is to present updated knowledge about the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of JME.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The review is based on a judicious selection of original English language articles, meta-analyses, and reviews found in PubMed, and the authors' own experience with the patient group.

RESULTS

Seizure onset occurs in adolescence. All have myoclonias, about 90 % have generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and one third have absences. Myoclonic jerks are frequently the debut symptom, while tonic-clonic seizures appear later on. Patients are particularly susceptible to seizures shortly after waking. It is important to ask specifically about myoclonias as most patients do not report jerks spontaneously. The electroencephalograms of 44-81 % of the patients show discharges of 4-6 Hz polyspike waves. Focal EEG abnormalities may be seen in about 30 %. When patients are treated with valproate and seizure-precipitating factors are avoided, especially sleep deprivation, about 80 % become seizure-free. Lamotrigine and levetiracetam are alternative therapies for women of childbearing age. Attempts to taper off the medication after several years of seizure freedom entail a high risk of seizure relapse.

INTERPRETATION

As there may be features of focal epilepsy in the seizure semiology and/or the EEGs, it may be difficult to diagnose JME. Thus, many patients are misdiagnosed as having a focal epilepsy and are given antiepileptic drugs that may aggravate the tendency to seizures.

Lacosamide treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is the most common form of idiopathic generalized epilepsy with onset at puberty or late teenage years. About 80-90% of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy respond to appropriate antiepileptic treatment and achieve seizure freedom, and about 15% of patients become intractable. Valproic acid, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, topiramate and zonisamide are used as first line or adjunctive therapy of this disorder. Lacosamide is approved for adjunctive treatment of partial onset epilepsies. The role of lacosamide in treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy including juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is unknown. We present three patients with classic clinical and electrographic features of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy that were maintained on lacosamide (one on monotherapy and two as adjuvant therapy). There were no special pharmacodynamic actions causing exacerbation or worsening of myoclonic jerks or generalized seizures in these three patients. In conclusion, although, the data from our three patients' suggest that lacosamide may be effective in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, larger studies are needed to explore efficacy and role of lacosamide in the treatment of this disorder.