Incidence of cervical cancer and age-specific survival of small cell cervical carcinoma in Taiwan

Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14-year multicenter study

BACKGROUND

To compare the oncological outcomes of radical chemotherapy (R-CT), abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer, according to histological types: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC).

METHODS

A comparison of 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was performed for the SCC and AC/ASC subgroups for the three initial treatments, assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and validated using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

The study included 4086 patients: R-CT, n = 1913; ARH, n = 1529; and NACT, n = 644. AC/ASC had a lower survival rate (63.7%) than SCC (73.6%) and a higher recurrence and mortality rate (36.3% and 26.4%, respectively). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were different in the SCC group for R-CT, ARH, and NACT (OS: 69.8% vs. 80.8% vs. 73.0%, p < 0.001; DFS: 66.7% vs. 70.7% vs. 56.4%, p < 0.001), also in the AC/ASC group (OS: 46.1% vs. 70.6% vs. 55.6%, p < 0.001; DFS: 42.7% vs. 64.6% vs. 40.8%, p < 0.001). As for initial treatment, survival outcomes were worse for AC/ASC treated with R-CT and ARH than for SCC (both p < 0.05), with no group differences between the two treated with NACT.

CONCLUSION

Initial treatment influences oncological prognosis for patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer. ARH is an alternative treatment for stage IIIC cervical SCC and AC/ASC, and NACT needs to be chosen with caution, moreover, R-CT for AC/ASC requires careful selection.

A Rare Case of Advanced Synchronous Primary Ovarian and Cervical Cancer

Synchronous gynecological malignancies are rarely encountered, with a growing tide to recognize these primary tumors. However, the most observed synchronous gynecological malignancies remain ovarian and endometrial cancer. This case report presents a 35-year-old female who presented to her gynecologist with lower back pain and dysuria. Transvaginal ultrasound demonstrated a 3-4 cm irregular mass in the cervix and lower uterine segment. Pathology from cold knife conization and endometrial curetting showed serous adenocarcinoma with probable lymphovascular invasion. The patient underwent a positron emission tomography scan that demonstrated an abnormal-appearing cervix, a small number of ascites, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and abnormal left adnexa. Eighteen days later, the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy with total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, lymphadenectomy, and bowel resection. Surgical histopathological findings confirmed the presence of two primary malignant tumors, namely, cervical adenosquamous carcinoma and bilateral ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma, with extensive metastatic lesions. Although synchronous ovarian and cervical cancer is rarely encountered, patients might benefit from early identification and subsequent debulking surgery with curative intent, as well as adding an immune checkpoint inhibitor in case it is positive on checking as it might improve long-term outcomes.

Comparison of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma prognoses in Chinese patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer following radical surgery

BACKGROUND

To compare adenocarcinoma (AC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) prognoses in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 240 patients with AC and 130 patients with ASC. Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression models, and log-rank tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with ASC had higher frequencies of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) > 5 ng/ml (p = 0.049 and p = 0.013, respectively); moreover, they were much older (P = 0.029) than patients with AC. There were no clinically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the groups. When stratified into three risk groups based on clinicopathological features, survival outcomes did not differ between patients with AC and those with ASC in any risk group. Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis (LNM) was an independent risk factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS in patients with AC and in patients with ASC. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 5 ng/ml and SCC-Ag > 5 ng/ml were independent predictors of RFS and OS in patients with AC. In addition, among those stratified as intermediate-risk, patients with ASC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) had significantly better RFS and OS (P = 0.036 and P = 0.047, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence to suggest that AC and ASC subtypes of cervical cancer were associated with different survival outcomes. CCRT is beneficial for survival in intermediate-risk patients with ASC, but not in those with AC. Serum tumour markers can assist in evaluating prognosis and in providing additional information for patient-tailored therapy for cervical AC.

Primary surgery versus primary radiation therapy for FIGO stages I-II small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the management of small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCCC) through a retrospective study of Taiwanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records and histological files of 144 patients with FIGO stages IA-IIB SCCC treated in 11 main hospitals in Taiwan from 1987 to 2009.

RESULTS

There were 110 patients receiving primary surgery and 34 primary radiation therapy. Most patients in each group also received chemotherapy as part of primary treatment. A lower loco-regional failure rate was observed in patients who received primary radiation therapy than in those who had primary surgery (6% vs. 27%; P=0.009). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 89% for 13 surgically treated patients with cervical tumor ≤2cm and no lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI) in whom recurrence was noted in 2 of 4 patients without receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and none in the 9 patients who had chemotherapy. Excluding these 13 patients, primary radiation therapy with at least 5cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (n=14, including 12 stages IB2-IIB) resulted in a 5-year OS of 78%, better than that of 46% by primary surgery (n=97, including 40 stages IB2-IIB) (P=0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the 9 patients with cervical tumor ≤2cm and no LVSI showed disease recurrence after primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. For most patients with stages I-II, primary radiation therapy with aggressive chemotherapy was associated with better survival than surgery.

Outcome analysis of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma compared with adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival between patients with cervical adenocarcinoma (AC) and adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

POPULATION

All patients with cervical AC or ASC who received definitive treatment from January 1995 to December 2009.

METHODS

Medical and histopathological record review.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall and recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 170 women received a histological diagnosis of AC and 42 of ASC. The median follow-up was 56.7 months. There were no significant differences in age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, gravidity or treatment modality between women with AC and ASC. Patients with ASC had a higher percentage of poorly differentiated tumors than those with AC (33.3 vs. 15.3%, respectively; p= 0.014). Five year overall and recurrence-free survival was 66.8 and 58.9%, respectively, for women with AC and 69.5 and 61.9%, respectively, for those with ASC (p= 0.795 and p= 0.892, respectively). Survival outcomes in patients with early or advanced stage disease did not differ between the histological groups. No differences in failure patterns were found between the two groups. The FIGO stage and treatment modality were factors which affected overall and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find evidence to suggest that ASC subtypes indicate worse outcome. Cervical ASC could be categorized as one subtype of AC. The FIGO stage and treatment modalities have greater influence on outcomes than histological subtype.