Identification of cases with adverse neonatal outcome monitored by cardiotocography versus ST analysis: secondary analysis of a randomized trial

Significant reduction in umbilical artery metabolic acidosis after implementation of intrapartum ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram

BACKGROUND

Although the evidence regarding the benefit of using ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is conflicting, ST waveform analysis is considered as adjunct to identify fetuses at risk for asphyxia in our center. Most randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have not shown a significant decrease in umbilical metabolic acidosis, while some observational studies have shown a gradual decrease of this outcome over a longer period of time. Observational studies can give more insight into the effect of implementation of the ST technology in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the change in frequency of perinatal intervention and adverse neonatal outcome after the implementation of ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram from 2000 to 2013.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in a tertiary referral center. A total of 19,664 medium- and high-risk singleton pregnancies with fetuses in cephalic presentation, a gestational age of ≥36 weeks, and the intention to deliver vaginally were included. ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram was implemented in the year 2000 and by 2010 all deliveries were monitored using this technology. Data were collected on the following perinatal outcomes: fetal blood sampling, mode of delivery, umbilical cord blood gases, Apgar scores, neonatal encephalopathy, and perinatal death. Longitudinal trend analysis was used to detect changes over time in all deliveries monitored by cardiotocography either alone or in adjunct to ST waveform analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram. Logistic regression was used to correct for possible confounders.

RESULTS

The umbilical artery metabolic acidosis rate declined from 2.5% (average rate of 2000 + 2001 + 2002) to 0.4% (average of 2011 + 2012 + 2013) (P < .001), which represents an 84% decrease. This decrease largely occurred between 2006 and 2008, during the Dutch randomized trial on fetal electrocardiogram ST waveform analysis. At this time, approximately 20% of deliveries were monitored using this method. Furthermore, there were significant reductions in fetal blood sampling rate (P < .001). Overall cesarean and vaginal instrumental deliveries decreased significantly (P < .001), but not for fetal distress. There were no changes in the Apgar scores. The incidence of neonatal encephalopathy was significantly lower in the second part of the study (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.89).

CONCLUSION

There was an 84% decrease in the incidence of umbilical artery metabolic acidosis in all deliveries between 2000 and 2013. The neonatal encephalopathy rate, fetal blood sampling rate, and the total number of cesarean and vaginal instrumental deliveries also decreased.

The importance of the learning process in ST analysis interpretation and its impact in improving clinical and neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring was introduced with the goal to reduce fetal hypoxia and deaths. However, continuous fetal heart rate monitoring has been shown to have a high sensitivity but also a high false-positive rate. To improve specificity, adjunctive technologies have been developed to identify fetuses at risk for intrapartum asphyxia. Intensive research on the value of ST-segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to standard electronic fetal monitoring in lowering the rates of fetal metabolic acidosis and operative deliveries has been ongoing. The conflicting results in randomized and observational studies may partly be due to differences in study design.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to determine the significance of the learning process for the introduction of ST analysis into clinical practice and its impact on initial and subsequent obstetric outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study with the primary objective to evaluate the importance of the learning period on the rates of metabolic acidosis and operative deliveries after the implementation of ST analysis. The study was conducted at the Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, with 3400-4200 annual deliveries. The whole study population consisted of all 42,146 deliveries during the study period 2001 through 2011. The ST analysis usage rate was 18%. The data were collected prospectively from labors monitored with ST analysis as an adjunct to conventional intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Primary endpoints were the rates of metabolic acidosis (cord artery pH <7.05 and an extracellular fluid compartment base deficit >12.0 mmol/L), fetal scalp blood sampling, and operative deliveries. Comparisons of these outcomes were made between the initiation period (the first 2 years) and the subsequent usage period (the next 9 years).

RESULTS

In the whole study population the prevalence of cord pH <7.05 decreased from 1.5-0.81% (relative risk, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.67), the rate of cesarean deliveries from 17.2-14.1% (relative risk, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.97), and the rate of fetal scalp blood sampling from 1.75-0.82% (relative risk, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.58) when the 2 study periods were compared. In the ST analysis group, the frequency of cord metabolic acidosis rate was reduced from 1.0-0.25% (relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.72).

CONCLUSION

We provide evidence that the results improve over time and there is a learning curve in the introduction of the ST analysis method. This was demonstrated by the lower rates of metabolic acidosis and operative deliveries after the initial implementation period.

Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour

BACKGROUND

Hypoxaemia during labour can alter the shape of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform, notably the relation of the PR to RR intervals, and elevation or depression of the ST segment. Technical systems have therefore been developed to monitor the fetal ECG during labour as an adjunct to continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring with the aim of improving fetal outcome and minimising unnecessary obstetric interference.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of analysis of fetal ECG waveforms during labour with alternative methods of fetal monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (latest search 23 September 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing fetal ECG waveform analysis with alternative methods of fetal monitoring during labour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. One review author assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials (27,403 women) were included: six trials of ST waveform analysis (26,446 women) and one trial of PR interval analysis (957 women). The trials were generally at low risk of bias for most domains and the quality of evidence for ST waveform analysis trials was graded moderate to high. In comparison to continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring alone, the use of adjunctive ST waveform analysis made no obvious difference to primary outcomes: births by caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.08; six trials, 26,446 women; high quality evidence); the number of babies with severe metabolic acidosis at birth (cord arterial pH less than 7.05 and base deficit greater than 12 mmol/L) (average RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.20; six trials, 25,682 babies; moderate quality evidence); or babies with neonatal encephalopathy (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.22; six trials, 26,410 babies; high quality evidence). There were, however, on average fewer fetal scalp samples taken during labour (average RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; four trials, 9671 babies; high quality evidence) although the findings were heterogeneous and there were no data from the largest trial (from the USA). There were marginally fewer operative vaginal births (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.99; six trials, 26,446 women); but no obvious difference in the number of babies with low Apgar scores at five minutes or babies requiring neonatal intubation, or babies requiring admission to the special care unit (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.04, six trials, 26,410 babies; high quality evidence). There was little evidence that monitoring by PR interval analysis conveyed any benefit of any sort.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The modest benefits of fewer fetal scalp samplings during labour (in settings in which this procedure is performed) and fewer instrumental vaginal births have to be considered against the disadvantages of needing to use an internal scalp electrode, after membrane rupture, for ECG waveform recordings. We found little strong evidence that ST waveform analysis had an effect on the primary outcome measures in this systematic review.There was a lack of evidence showing that PR interval analysis improved any outcomes; and a larger future trial may possibly demonstrate beneficial effects.There is little information about the value of fetal ECG waveform monitoring in preterm fetuses in labour. Information about long-term development of the babies included in the trials would be valuable.

Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour

BACKGROUND

Hypoxaemia during labour can alter the shape of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) waveform, notably the relation of the PR to RR intervals, and elevation or depression of the ST segment. Technical systems have therefore been developed to monitor the fetal ECG during labour as an adjunct to continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring with the aim of improving fetal outcome and minimising unnecessary obstetric interference.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of analysis of fetal ECG waveforms during labour with alternative methods of fetal monitoring.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (latest search 12 February 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing fetal ECG waveform analysis with alternative methods of fetal monitoring during labour.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial quality assessment and data extraction were performed by one review author, without blinding.

MAIN RESULTS

Six trials (16,295 women) were included: five trials of ST waveform analysis (15,338 women) and one trial of PR interval analysis (957 women). In comparison to continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring alone, the use of adjunctive ST waveform analysis made no significant difference to primary outcomes: births by caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.08), the number of babies with severe metabolic acidosis at birth (cord arterial pH less than 7.05 and base deficit greater than 12 mmol/L) (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.37, data from 14,574 babies), or babies with neonatal encephalopathy (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.25). There were, however, on average fewer fetal scalp samples taken during labour (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91) although the findings were heterogeneous; there were fewer operative vaginal deliveries (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98) and admissions to special care unit (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99); there was no statistically significant difference in the number of babies with low Apgar scores at five minutes or babies requiring neonatal intubation. There was little evidence that monitoring by PR interval analysis conveyed any benefit.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide some modest support for the use of fetal ST waveform analysis when a decision has been made to undertake continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring during labour. However, the advantages need to be considered along with the disadvantages of needing to use an internal scalp electrode, after membrane rupture, for ECG waveform recordings.

Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) alone and with additional ST analysis (EFM + ST) in laboring women with a singleton term pregnancy that is in cephalic presentation in the prevention of metabolic acidosis by the application of individual patient data metaanalysis.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted an individual patient data metaanalysis using data from 4 randomized trials, which enabled us to account for missing data and investigate relevant subgroups. The primary outcome was metabolic acidosis, which was defined as an umbilical cord-artery pH <7.05 and a base deficit that had been calculated in the extra cellular fluid compartment >12 mmol/L. We performed 8 explanatory subgroup analyses for 8 different endpoints.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 12,987 women and their newborn infants. Metabolic acidosis was present in 57 women (0.9%) in the EFM + ST group and 73 women (1.1%) in the EFM alone group (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10). Compared with EFM alone, the use of EFM + ST resulted in a reduction in the frequency of instrumental vaginal deliveries (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99) and fetal blood samples (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55). Cesarean delivery rates were comparable between both groups (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). Subgroup analyses showed that EFM + ST resulted in fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit for women with a duration of pregnancy of >41 weeks (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.95).

CONCLUSION

EFM + ST does not reduce the risk of metabolic acidosis, but it does reduce the need for instrumental vaginal deliveries and fetal blood sampling.