A cross-sectional audit of benzodiazepine use among general practice patients

Continuous Infusion of Flumazenil in the Management of Benzodiazepines Detoxification

An effective approach in the treatment of benzodiazepine (BZD) overdosing and detoxification is flumazenil (FLU). Studies in chronic users who discontinued BZD in a clinical setting suggested that multiple slow bolus infusions of FLU reduce BZD withdrawal symptoms. The aim of this study was to confirm FLU efficacy for reducing BZD withdrawal syndrome by means of continuous elastomeric infusion, correlated to drugs plasma level and patients' compliance. Methods: Seven-day FLU 1 mg/day subcutaneously injected through an elastomeric pump and BZDs lormetazepam, clonazepam, and lorazepam were assessed by HPLC-MS/MS in serum of patients before and after 4 and 7 days of FLU continuous infusion treatment. Changes in withdrawal severity were assessed by using the BZD Withdrawal Scale (BWS). Results: Fourteen patients (mean age ± SD 42.5 ± 8.0 years, 5 male and 9 female), admitted to the hospital for high-dose BZD detoxification, were enrolled in the study. Serum FLU concentrations significantly decreased from 0.54 ± 0.33 ng/ml (mean ± SD) after 4 days of treatment to 0.1 ± 0.2 ng/ml at the end of infusion. Lormetazepam concentrations were 502.5 ± 610.0 ng/ml at hospital admission, 26.2 ± 26.8 ng/ml after 4 days, and 0 at the end of treatment. BWS values decreased during FLU treatment temporal period. FLU was well-tolerated by patients. Conclusions: Elastomeric FLU infusion for BZD detoxification is a feasible administration device to maintain adequate, constant, and tolerated FLU concentrations for reducing BZD withdrawal symptoms.

Bridging the gap between education and appropriate use of benzodiazepines in psychiatric clinical practice

More than half a century after their discovery, benzodiazepines (BDZs) still represent one of the largest and most widely prescribed groups of psychotropic compounds, not only in clinical psychiatry but also in the entire medical field. Over the last two decades, however, there has been an increased focus on the development of antidepressants and antipsychotics on the part of the pharmaceutical industry, clinicians, and researchers, with a reduced interest in BDZs, in spite of their widespread clinical use. As a consequence, many psychiatric residents, medical students, nurses, and other mental health professionals might receive poor academic teaching and training regarding these agents, and have the false impression that BDZs represent an outdated chapter in clinical psychopharmacology. However, recent advances in the field, including findings concerning epidemiology, addiction risk, and drug interactions, as well as the introduction of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition with related diagnostic changes, strongly encourage an updated appraisal of the use of BDZs in clinical practice. During a recent thematic event convened with the aim of approaching this topic in a critical manner, a group of young Italian psychiatrists attempted to highlight possible flaws in current teaching pathways, identify the main clinical pros and cons regarding current use of BDZs in clinical practice, and provide an updated overview of their use across specific clinical areas and patient populations. The main results are presented and discussed in this review.

Misuse of medicines in the European Union: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Although awareness of the misuse of medicines is increasing, data on the extent of the problem in the European Union (EU) are lacking.

METHODS

In order to assess the magnitude and severity of the problem, a systematic review of the literature on the misuse of analgesics, opioid substitution medicines and sedatives/hypnotics (with the exception of benzodiazepines) was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Relevant literature was identified between 2001 and 2011.

RESULTS

The main groups of misused medicines include opioid analgesics, methadone, buprenorphine and Z-drugs. Regional trends in medicine misuse indicate heterogeneity across the EU with respect to misused medicine types and research activities. Prevalence, high-risk populations and factors contributing to medicine misuse are discussed.

CONCLUSION

The implications of these findings for prevention, treatment, and policy in the EU are considered.

Correlates of (inappropriate) benzodiazepine use: the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)

AIM

Results on determinants of benzodiazepine (BZD) use in general and inappropriate use were inconsistent and mostly univariate. The relative importance of sociodemographic, psychological and physical determinants has never been investigated in a comprehensive, multivariate model.

METHODS

We included 429 BZD users and 2423 non-users from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) in order to investigate sociodemographic, psychological and physical determinants of BZD use and inappropriate use by logistic and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

BZDs were used by a considerable proportion of the 2852 NESDA participants (15.0%). BZD use was independently associated with older age, singleness, unemployment, treatment in secondary care, higher medical consumption (more severe) anxiety, depression (OR [95% CI]=1.95 [1.29, 2.93]), comorbidity, insomnia, SSRI (OR [95% CI]=2.05 [1.55, 2.70]), TCA and other antidepressant (OR [95% CI]=2.44 [1.64, 3.62]) use. Overall, BZD use was rarely in accordance with all guidelines, mainly because most users (82.5%) exceeded the recommended duration of safe use. Inappropriate use was independently associated with older age (β=0.130) and chronic illnesses (β=0.120). Higher scores on agreeableness were associated with less inappropriate use.

CONCLUSIONS

Mentally or physically vulnerable subjects were most likely to use BZDs. The most vulnerable (i.e. the old and physically ill) BZD users were at highest risk of inappropriate BZD use. Without further evidence of the effectiveness of BZDs in long-term use, caution in initiating BZD prescriptions is recommended, particularly when patients are chronically ill and old, as those are most likely to display inappropriate use.

A descriptive study of anxiolytic and hypnotic prescribing according to age and sex

Objective

Benzodiazepines are primarily indicated for the treatment of anxiety states and as hypnotics. Their inappropriate use often relates to duration and manner of use. Few studies have attempted to assess the prevalence of benzodiazepine prescribing in South Africa. The primary aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of sedative/hypnotic prescribing according to patient age and sex in a primary care setting. Setting South African private healthcare patients.

Method

An exposure cohort drug utilisation study was conducted. Prescription data were obtained from a South African private medical aid administrator. Descriptive statistics were used in the data analysis.

Key findings

Prescription records (n = 27 080) of 8084 patients in 2004 who were prescribed one or more benzodiazepines were retrospectively analysed. The average age of patients receiving benzodiazepines was 43.17 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.42 years). Benzodiazepine prescribing was more common in females (55.64% of patients were female). There was an increase in prescriptions per patient with increasing age, peaking at an older age among females. Diazepam (13.36%), zopiclone (13.19%) and oxazepam (12.03%) were the most frequently prescribed active ingredients. The majority of benzodiazepine hypnotics were prescribed in quantities of up to 14 units (tablets or capsules), while the benzodiazepine-related drugs zolpidem and zopiclone were prescribed in quantities of up to 30 units. Anxiolytics were often prescribed in quantities of 20 to 30 units.

Conclusion

Anxiolytics were prescribed in greater quantities than hypnotics. An increase in anxiolytic/hypnotic prescriptions and quantities of tablets/capsules occurred with increasing age. The trends and differences that were detected in the prescribing of benzodiazepines warrant further investigation in larger patient populations, especially with respect to the choice of agent, duration of treatment and patient age.

Factors influencing dispensing of psychotropic medications to patients with asthma: a community pharmacy-based survey

BACKGROUND

To our knowledge, the use of psychotropic medications (antidepressant, anxiolytic, and hypnotic agents) in patients with asthma has not been extensively explored.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with the use of these medications in patients with asthma.

METHODS

Regular customers (aged 18-50 years) of 348 pharmacies in 9 French regions were consecutively recruited from November 2003 to June 2004. Patients with a prescription for an asthma medication were included. Patients completed a questionnaire, complemented by the computerized records of their therapy dispensed in the past 12 months. Asthma control was measured with the Asthma Control Test.

RESULTS

Among 886 patients (mean age, 37.4 years; 55.0% female), during the 12 months before the survey, the proportions who received at least 1 U of anxiolytic, antidepressant, and hypnotic agents were 25.6%, 13.7%, and 13.0%, respectively. Higher dispensing levels of antidepressant, anxiolytic, and hypnotic agents were observed with decreasing asthma control (P < .001 for each drug class). Other correlates of receiving any of these classes included older age, female sex, smoking status, and dispensing of antireflux treatment (P < .001 for all). These results were confirmed in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychotropic drugs were commonly dispensed to patients with asthma, and correlates of receiving these drugs were identified in this population. The high use of psychotropic medication, particularly in patients with poorly controlled asthma, is of concern.

Dissociation between objective psychomotor impairment and subjective sleepiness after diazepam administration in the aged people

The aim of the present study was to clarify whether subjective sleepiness accurately reflects benzodiazepine-related decline in psychomotor function after taking benzodiazepines (BZPs) in aged people. Subjects were eight healthy, young (mean age, 19.8 years) and seven healthy, older (mean age, 60.9 years) men. Placebo and diazepam (DZP) were administered orally in a single-blind crossover manner to the young subjects (placebo, 5 mg DZP and 10 mg DZP) and to the older subjects (placebo and 5 mg DZP). Plasma drug concentration, choice reaction time (CRT) as an objective measure of psychomotor function, and the Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) as a measure of subjective sleepiness were monitored every 20 min from 1000 until 1600 h, being the drug administered at 1200 h. Pharmacokinetic variables did not differ significantly between the two age groups. DZP at 10 mg in young subjects induced significant increases in both the CRT and SSS score. DZP at 5 mg induced no significant increase in SSS score in either age group but did induce a significant increase in CRT only in the older subjects that matched that in young subjects given 10 mg DZP. The older subjects suffered from dissociation between subjective sleepiness and objective psychomotor impairment under DZP treatment. Such individuals may underestimate the detrimental effects on brain function.

Use of benzodiazepine drugs and perceived job stress in a cohort of working men and women in Belgium. Results from the BELSTRESS-study

The aim of the Belstress Study was to see whether use of benzodiazepines is associated with perceived job stress as measured by Karasek's job-strain model. This model has as its central tenet that the most adverse health outcomes are to be expected in high strain jobs characterized by high job demands and low job control. An extension of the model states that the most noxious combination is high job demands, low control and low social support at work. Sample subjects were recruited from 25 Belgian companies between 1994 and 1998, and cover a wide range of occupations. A 5.6% of 16,094 men and 9.3% of 5012 women aged 35-59 years report use of benzodiazepines during the last month. A clear association is displayed between self-reported use of benzodiazepines and a high strain job compared to a low strain job (men: OR=1.93, 99% CI=1.4-2.6; women: OR=1.66, 99% CI=1.0-2.7), after adjustment is made for socio-demographic confounders (age, level of education, occupational group, employment sector, living situation). The independent association with quartile level of job demands is a striking feature (men: OR of highest quartile compared to lowest quartile group=1.91, 99% CI=1.4-2.6; women: OR=1.99, 99% CI=1.3-3.1). In men, an inverse association with quartile level of job control is observed (OR= 0.65, 99% CI=0.5-0.9) whereas in women a clear tendency in that direction is displayed (OR=0.62, 99% CI=0.4-1.1). The association with low social support is less clear; an independent association between use of benzodiazepines and iso-strain was observed particularly in men.

Long-term benzodiazepine use and cognitive decline in the elderly: the Epidemiology of Vascular Aging Study

Several cross-sectional studies have found cognitive impairment in subjects taking benzodiazepines for long periods. However, it is not known whether long-term use of benzodiazepines accelerates cognitive decline in the elderly. The authors addressed this issue in a follow-up study of 1,389 people aged 60 to 70 years recruited from the electoral rolls of the city of Nantes (Epidemiology of Vascular Aging study). Data on cognitive functioning (five cognitive tests), depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), anxiety symptoms (Spielberger Inventory Scale), use of psychotropics and other drugs, and tobacco and alcohol consumption were collected at baseline, 2-year, and 4-year examinations. People reporting to take benzodiazepines at one, two and three examinations were classified as episodic, recurrent, and chronic users, respectively. Among the 1,176 subjects (85%) who participated in the three examinations, the proportions of episodic, recurrent, and chronic users were 10%, 6%, and 7%, respectively. Chronic users of benzodiazepines had a significantly higher risk of cognitive decline in the global cognitive test (Mini Mental State Examination) and the two attention tests than nonusers (Mini Mental State Examination: odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 1.9 [1.0-3.5]; Digit Symbol Substitution test: OR [95% CI] = 2.7 [1.6-4.7]; Trail Making test, part B: OR [95% CI] = 2.1 [1.2-3.7]). Overall, episodic and recurrent users had lower cognitive scores than nonusers, but differences were not statistically significant. These results were independent of age, sex, education, alcohol and tobacco use, anxiety and depression scores, and use of psychotropic drugs other than benzodiazepines. The findings suggest that long-term use of benzodiazepines is risk factor of increased cognitive decline in the elderly.

Psychotropic drug use in Italy, 1984-99: the impact of a change in reimbursement status

After years of corruption surrounding drug reimbursement, in 1994, a change in drug reimbursement status was implemented in Italy according to cost-effectiveness criteria. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of these changes on the use of psychotropic drugs. National trends in antipsychotic, antidepressant and benzodiazepine prescriptions were analysed from 1984 to 1999. During the study period, prescriptions of antipsychotic drugs were stable from 1984 to 1994 but, in the subsequent 5 years, increased by 54%. Although the use of atypical compounds in 1999 accounted for only 6% of total antipsychotics sold, the cost of these new drugs accounted for almost one-half the total antipsychotic expenditure. The use of benzodiazepines increased by 53%. In 1999, the psychotropic drugs lorazepam and alprazolam were the most sold by value. From 1984 to 1999, the total antidepressants sold increased by 55%. Although the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and newer antidepressants in 1999 accounted for less than 50% of total antidepressants sold, the cost of these drugs accounted for 65% of total antidepressant expenditure. This analysis highlights specific areas of concern which should become the object of public health programs.

[Long-term benzodiazepine use in women at a daycare center for older people]

While experts recommend caution against long-term benzodiazepine use in the elderly, survey data suggests that the use of benzodiazepine increase with age. The patterns of benzodiazepine use and factors associated with long-term use in population at risk were studied with a standarlized questionnaire applied to 634 women over 60, who attended a daycare center for older people in Rio de Janeiro between May, 1992 and December, 1995. Prevalence of benzodiazepine use in the last 15 days was 21.3% (CI 95% 18.1-24.5), and prevalence of daily use for 12 or more months was 7.4% (CI 95% 5.4-9.4). In a multivaried analysis the amount of drugs being consumed displayed an important and progressive association with long-term benzodiazepine use, with OR = 2.77 (CI 95% 1.17-6.57) for those who take from four to six drugs, and OR = 7.62 (CI 95% 3.18-18.26) for those who take more than seven drugs. Insomnia (OR = 8.87 CI 95% 2.53-31.06) and chronic headache (OR = 3.53 CI 95% 1.82-6.89) have also been associated with this pattern of use.

[The use of psychotropic drugs in an Italian psychiatric hospital: a two-year-long follow-up study]

OBJECTIVE

Following the introduction of guidelines of rational drug use, the pharmacoepidemiology of psychotropic drugs was investigated in a sample of long-stay patients living in a Italian psychiatric hospital.

DESIGN

A prospective, longitudinal two-year follow-up study was carried out. Information about sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the inpatient population, and about medications prescribed, was collected at baseline and after one and two years of follow-up.

SETTING

Three wards of the psychiatric hospital of Milan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of patients taking psychotropic drugs, number of patients taking more than one neuroleptic or benzodiazepine, mean neuroleptic dose, psychopathological status according to the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS).

RESULTS

70 patients were recruited and followed for two years. At follow-up a reduction in the number of patients taking neuroleptic drugs was recorded, together with a 50% decrease in the number of patients taking more than one neuroleptic. A reduction in the use of depot formulations was in addition shown. Patients taking benzodiazepines decreased of 50%. According to the BPRS, no psychopatological changes were observed during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that education in psychopharmacology may guide towards a more rational use of drugs; longitudinal clinical audits should be implemented to monitor everyday practice.