Accuracy of axillary staging using sentinel node biopsy or diagnostic axillary lymph node dissection - a case-control study

Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema

This article provides an overview of the recent developments in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphedema incidence by tumor site is evaluated. Measurement techniques and trends in patient education and treatment are also summarized to include current trends in therapeutic and surgical treatment options as well as longer-term management. Finally, an overview of the policies related to insurance coverage and reimbursement will give the clinician an overview of important trends in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of cancer-related lymphedema.

VEGF-D in association with VEGFR-3 promotes nodal metastasis in human invasive lobular breast cancer

We assessed the expression of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF-C and VEGF-D) in breast cancer cells and the density of lymph vessels and VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3)-positive vessels in and around the tumor in invasive lobular breast cancer. We found significant correlation between peritumoral lymph vessel density and presence of lymph node metastases (P=.001) and the number of metastatic lymph nodes (P<.001). A significant correlation was detected between tumor cell VEGF-D expression and lymph node status (P=.001) and density of lymphatic vessel endothelial receptor (LYVE)-1-positive vessels (P=.035). VEGFR-3+/VEGF-D+ and VEGFR-3+/VEGF-C+ tumors had a significantly higher number of metastatic lymph nodes than tumors with other staining patterns (P<.001). Tumors positive for neither VEGF-D nor VEGFR-3 had a lower density of LYVE-1+ vessels than tumors with other staining patterns (P=.033). Our results indicate that peritumoral lymph vessel density is associated with lymph node metastases in invasive lobular breast cancer and that invasive lobular cancer producing VEGF-D, surrounded by VEGFR-3+ vessels, has a significantly higher peritumoral lymph vessel density and a higher number of metastatic lymph nodes.

Effects of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Surgical Residency Training

Axillary node dissection (AND) is an integral part of surgical training. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) was introduced into our residency in 1997. Our purpose in this study was to evaluate the impact of SLN on AND experience. AND/SLN operative experience of residents and attendings at our residency was reviewed using resident case-logs and questionnaires from 2002 and 2005. The perception of performing and teaching AND was assessed. Thirty-three residents and 24 attendings participated. Graduating chiefs from the class of 2000 performed no SLN, which increased to 4.25 in 2002 and to 8.5 in 2005. In contrast, graduating chiefs performed 25 AND in 2000, which decreased to 16.5 in 2002 and to 13.25 in 2005. The majority of the residents felt that AND was a senior level case (56% postgraduate year [PGY] I and II and 87% PGY III–V). The majority of the residents felt that SLN was a junior level case (89% PGY I and II and PGY III–V). Fifty-six per cent of PGY III–V felt that SLN introduction negatively impacted their ability to perform AND. Attendings cited 15 and 24 AND before feeling comfortable performing and teaching the procedure to a resident. Since the introduction of SLN into our residency, the number of AND has decreased, with senior residents feeling that SLN has decreased their ability to perform AND. As fewer AND are performed than our attendings cite to feel comfortable, future residents may not be competent to perform or teach AND.

The prevalence of axillary lymph-node metastases in patients with pure tubular carcinoma of the breast and sentinel node biopsy

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of and the risk factors for axillary lymph-node metastases in pure tubular carcinoma (PTC) of the breast. The role of axillary staging and treatment in PTC was also evaluated.

METHODS

Between March 2001 and August 2004, 33 PTC patients underwent sentinel node (SN) biopsy as a part of their surgical treatment. Level I/II axillary clearance was carried out in case of tumour positive SN findings. To confirm the correct histological diagnosis (PTC, >90% tubular component), the breast tumours were reviewed by an expert breast pathologist.

RESULTS

The SN were successfully harvested in all patients. The median number of SN harvested in the axilla was 3 (range 1-10). Nine (27%) of the 33 patients had axillary nodal metastases. The median number of metastatic nodes was 1 (range 1-3). The median size of the SN metastases was 0.5 mm (mean 1.7 mm, range 0.4-5 mm). In six patients, micrometastases were the only tumour positive SN findings. The median histological tumour size was similar, 9 vs 10mm, in patients with or without axillary metastases. The median patient age was 54 (range 44-71) and 57 (range 39-80) years, respectively. After the histopathological review, six of the 27 patients with true PTC had axillary metastases. The review did not significantly change the risk factors for axillary metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Every fourth PTC patient has axillary lymph-node metastases, most often micrometastases. SN biopsy appears as a feasible method for axillary staging in PTC patients.

Is intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer cost effective?

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are generally evaluated postoperatively, requiring 5-7 days for assessment. SLNs can also be evaluated intraoperatively by using touch imprint cytology (TIC), thus providing the surgeon immediate feedback and allowing for concurrent completion node dissection (CND) for positive SLNs. The authors hypothesized that TIC, when compared with standard postoperative SLN assessment alone, would permit a cost-effective evaluation of SLNs in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer.

METHODS

A decision-analysis model was created to compare TIC with standard postoperative SLN assessment alone. Sensitivity and specificity of TIC were determined prospectively from 342 patients who underwent SLN biopsy assessed by both techniques. Short-term health states associated with surgical staging were defined, and utilities were estimated using EuroQol-5D. Base-case analysis was performed to estimate quality-adjusted life years and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine stability of model parameters.

RESULTS

For each tumor stage, TIC was cost effective, and for patients with larger tumors (T3 and T4), TIC was the dominant strategy. The analysis was robust to changes in sensitivity and specificity of TIC, prevalence of metastasis, probability of complications, and cost. However, when utility associated with standard SLN assessment was 0.9 or greater, this became the preferred strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

TIC is cost effective for assessing SLN metastasis intraoperatively. For patients with larger tumors, it is not only more effective, but also less costly than standard SLN assessment alone. TIC may be particularly useful for patients who experience significant anxiety while awaiting results of standard SLN assessment.

Implications of the sentinel lymph node procedure for local and systemic adjuvant treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer is to perform an accurate axillary staging and provide good local control, while sparing the patients the morbidity of an axillary lymph node dissection. Since its routine clinical use, questions were raised concerning the implications for local and systemic adjuvant treatment. This review provides an update of the recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

As a result of a more detailed histopathologic work-up of the sentinel lymph node, higher rates of lymph node metastases are detected. This leads to an upstaging of a subset of node-negative patients and an increase in the overall percentage of node-positive patients. However, the clinical implications of micrometastases and isolated tumor cells remain unclear. Furthermore, sentinel lymph nodes may be found in the internal mammary lymph node chain but the treatment of these nodes is subject of debate.

SUMMARY

Current guidelines recommend axillary lymph node dissection in patients with a positive sentinel node. The surgical removal of the internal mammary lymph node is only indicated in the context of a clinical trial. Radiation therapy of the axilla is an acceptable alternative for patients who refuse an axillary lymph node dissection (clinical trial). The value of radiotherapy to the internal mammary lymph node has never been established. Systemic treatment decisions in patients with a macrometastasis or micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node follow the guidelines of node-positive patients, whereas in patients with isolated tumor cells only, guidelines for node-negative patients are followed. The results of ongoing clinical trials will be important for the development of further guidelines.

Sentinel node biopsy is not sensible in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the outcome of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer patients with large primary tumours.

METHODS

Nine hundred and eighty-four patients with invasive breast cancer and SNB were studied. The histological tumour size was larger than 3 cm in 70 patients. The advantages of SNB like avoiding axillary clearance (AC) or more accurate staging by detecting micrometastases or parasternal sentinel node metastases were evaluated in relation to the tumour size.

RESULTS

Axillary metastases were detected in 351/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and in 50/70 patients with larger tumours (p<<0.0001). Micrometastases or isolated tumour cells only, were observed in 134/351 node positive patients with tumours not larger than 3 cm and in 10/50 cases with larger tumours (p=0.022). Parasternal sentinel node metastases were detected in 17/914 patients with a tumour size of 3 cm or smaller and 2/70 patients with larger tumours (p=ns). AC was omitted because of tumour negative sentinel node findings 168 of the 232 patients with stage T1 a-b tumours and 281 of those 489 with T1c tumours. Twenty of the 70 patients with tumours larger than 3 cm avoided AC.

CONCLUSIONS

SNB is not sensible in breast cancer patients with tumours larger than 3 cm, because of the small proportion avoiding AC after SNB.