The influence of gingival stimulation on recovery from human experimental gingivitis

Effect of mechanical toothbrush stimulation on gingival microcirculatory functions in inflamed gingiva of dogs

The effect of mechanical toothbrush stimulation on gingival microcirculatory functions was examined with and without removal of supragingival plaque in inflamed gingiva of 6 dogs. After removal of the ligatures, 4 treatment modalities: mechanical stimulation by vibration (MS), removal of supragingival plaque (PR), combination (MS+PR) and no treatment (NT), were administered to each quadrant for 2 weeks. Both quadrants with plaque removal showed a marked decrease in the gingival index score, while slight and moderate decreases were observed in NT and MS quadrants, respectively. Changes in gingival crevicular fluid flow, pocket oxygen tension and hemoglobin oxygen saturation in the gingiva were significant in the MS, PR and MS+PR quadrants. Significant treatment-by-time effects were found for all of the parameters of microcirculatory function between NT and MS quadrants, and gingival crevicular fluid flow between PR and MS+PR quadrants, respectively. These findings suggest that mechanical stimulation with a toothbrush may offer an additional benefit to gingival microcirculatory functions in inflamed gingiva.

Comparisons of modalities of mechanical stimulation with a toothbrush on improvement of oxygen sufficiency in dog gingiva

Mechanical stimulation with a toothbrush was applied to each quadrant of 10 dogs at a force of 200 g for 10 s using following modalities: vibration at attached gingiva, pressurization at attached gingiva, vibration at marginal gingiva and no treatment as a control. Hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SO2) in the gingiva was measured by non-invasive tissue reflectance spectrophotometry. Simultaneously, oxygen tension (pO2) in gingival tissue was monitored with an oxygen microelectrode. Both SO2 and pO2 increased within 10-20 min after stimulation and then slowly returned to the initial level at all treatment sites. The response was most prominent after vibration at attached gingiva. SO2 and pO2 increased by 12% and 42%, respectively, and significant increase continued for 75-85 min. Response after vibration at marginal gingiva was moderate in pO2 and transient in SO2. Pressurization at attached gingiva caused moderate response in SO2, but the increase in pO2 was slight. Control showed little change in both indices. These results suggest that vibration with a toothbrush at attached gingiva may cause a maximal response in improving oxygen sufficiency to gingival tissue.

Development of plaque and gingivitis after mouthrinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride

A double-blind, randomized, 2-wk experimental gingivitis clinical trial with cross-over design in 14 dental students was conducted in order to study the efficacy and safety of delmopinol hydrochloride solution (2 mg/ml), used with no other oral hygiene procedures, in comparison with placebo. Plaque formation was measured by the Quigley & Hein Plaque Index and gingivitis was assessed by bleeding on probing according to Mühlemann & Son. Rinsing with delmopinol resulted in lower plaque scores compared to placebo. The development of gingivitis was weak during the 2-wk test periods, and thus no conclusive results were obtained. As in previous studies, the most frequent adverse event when rinsing with delmopinol was a transient anaesthetic sensation in the oral mucosa. The results showed that rinsing with delmopinol hydrochloride solution (2 mg/ml) for 60 s twice daily with no other oral hygiene procedures led to less plaque formation than rinsing with placebo. This study also showed good tolerance and acceptability of mouthrinsing with delmopinol.

Relative effectiveness of various alternating frequencies of a power toothbrush

The influence on plaque-removing efficiency of the alternating frequency of a powered brush has never been established. In the present study, a mechanical brush was tested at various alternations per minute (F1 = 2100, F2 = 2500, F3 = 3500). A double-blind, randomized, triple crossover design was applied. After a plaque growth phase, the test brushes were used under supervision for 90 s and the remaining plaque scored. A ridit analysis yielded significant differences between F2 and F1/F3. Odds ratios and frequency distributions demonstrated a clinically meaningful advantage for F2. Subjective evaluation by the participants confirmed the positive performance of F2. The results can be generalized in 3 ways: (1) the alternating frequency of a power brush influences its effectiveness, (2) high frequencies are not generally superior, (3) the test brush has its optimal cleaning efficiency at F2, which does not necessarily need to be true for other brands. It seems imperative to determine the optimal frequency for any new brush in a controlled study.

Why pick on teeth?

In the evolution of oral hygiene practices, the toothpick is the progenitor device. Although modern variations are used interdentally, with the current emphasis on plaque control rather than gingival massage and stimulation, the toothpick has been largely superseded by floss, interproximal brushes, and other supplementary aids. The natural hard bristle toothbrush and vigorous scrub brushing popular a generation ago have been replaced by soft bristle nylon brushes and gentler, more defined brushing procedures for plaque removal in the crevicular areas. Quantitative studies support the superiority of the current techniques in maintaining periodontal health with less trauma to the oral tissues.