The effects of a simplified mechanical oral hygiene regime plus supragingival irrigation with chlorhexidine or metronidazole on subgingival plaque

A Comparative Review of Water Flossers in Periodontal Therapy

This study investigated the efficacy of water flossers (WFs), devices used to irrigate the interdental and subgingival areas, compared to other interdental care methods, in the management of periodontal disease. A computerized PubMed search was conducted by the author, encompassing the years 1962 to 2023. The year 1962 was selected due to it being the introduction of the first WF. Keywords included "oral irrigator", "efficacy," and "water flossers." The review provided a broad comparative assessment of WFs, rather than an exhaustive detailed article review. We discussed the history and evolution of commercially available WFs and introduced a novel classification system. The research also evaluated the performance of WFs in comparison to traditional and novel interdental care methods, focusing on crucial clinical parameters such as plaque removal efficiency and reduction in gingival inflammation. The results of the study reveal that WFs appear to be superior in the management of periodontal disease and have demonstrated effectiveness in a variety of indices. However, it's worth noting that the author did not statistically analyze any of the data. We identified gaps in the literature and found opportunities for further clinical studies. These findings hold implications for optimal periodontal disease prevention and management, addressing the evolving landscape of oral care practices.

Effect of supragingival oral irrigation as an adjunct to toothbrushing on plaque accumulation in chronic generalized gingivitis patients

Aim:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of supragingival oral irrigation either with water or different concentrations of chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate as an adjunct to toothbrushing on plaque accumulation in chronic generalized gingivitis patients.

Materials and Methods:

Fifty patients were randomly allocated into five groups. Group 1: toothbrushing alone, Group 2: toothbrushing with mouthwash, Group 3: toothbrushing with water irrigation, Group 4: toothbrushing with 0.0075% CHX digluconate (36 mg) supragingival irrigation, and Group 5: toothbrushing with 0.02% CHX digluconate (96 mg) supragingival irrigation. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis:

Descriptive data were obtained for all outcome variables and reported as mean ± standard deviation. The Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were applied for the statistical evaluation of means and comparisons of proportions, and post hoc Bonferroni test was used for multiple comparisons after the application of the ANOVA test for comparison within the groups.

Results:

When intergroup difference of the mean differences was compared for individuals using toothbrushing along with 0.0075% CHX digluconate irrigation and those using toothbrushing along with 0.02% CHX digluconate irrigation from BL-14, BL-28, and between 14 and 28 days, it was found to be statistically nonsignificant.

Conclusions:

In our study, the CHX digluconate concentration for mouthwash and oral irrigation in addition with toothbrushing was found to be same, i.e., <50 mg for improving the gingival health by reducing gingival inflammation.

Position Paper: The Role of Supra- and Subgingival Irrigation in the Treatment of Periodontal Diseases

This position paper addresses the role of supra- and subgingival irrigation in the treatment of periodontal diseases. It was prepared by the Committee on Research, Science and Therapy of the American Academy of Periodontology. The document is divided into two portions, consisting of supragingival irrigation and subgingival irrigation. In their respective segments, these treatment techniques are assessed as monotherapies and as adjuncts to conventional treatment. The conclusions drawn in this paper represent the position of the American Academy of Periodontology regarding irrigation therapy in the treatment of periodontal diseases.

Effective, safe, practical and affordable periodontal antimicrobial therapy: where are we going, and are we there yet?

Several important trends are noticeable in the management of periodontal disease. Searching for specific risk factors for periodontal disease permits therapy planning with the intention of doing less for low-risk patients and increasing the preventive and therapeutic modalities for high-risk patients. Also, significant progress in the area of chemotherapeutic development enables dentists to increase the number of periodontitis patients receiving nondisruptive antimicrobial therapy and decreases the need for surgical treatment. Use of anti-infective chemotherapeutic and antibiotic agents has become a specialized and increasingly effective means of preventing and treating destructive periodontal disease. Local care, including subgingival application of some type of antiseptics, is widely accepted. The use of systemic antibiotics is not routine and should be reserved for aggressive and refractory periodontal infections. In general, it is better to be thoroughly familiar with a limited number of drugs and treatment methods and use them properly than to try to master a plethora of antimicrobial therapies. Combating periodontal infections is best accomplished by combined mechanical and chemotherapeutic efforts of the dental professional and the patient. The trend during recent years has been to treat periodontal infections aggressively, employing short-course antimicrobial therapy using a battery of safe and affordable antimicrobial agents, each exhibiting high activity against various periodontal pathogens and administered in ways to concurrently affect pathogens residing in different oral ecological niches, followed by regular maintenance visits having a strong anti-infective emphasis. At the beginning of therapy, patients should be assigned self-help tasks having maximal antimicrobial effectiveness, with a focus on control of the subgingival periodontopathic microbiota. When patients see positive clinical results from their daily oral hygiene efforts, they are motivated to remain active participants in managing their periodontal condition. This article emphasizes anti-infective periodontal therapies that are effective and, when properly administered, are essentially nontoxic; are widely available around the world to dentists as well as to patients; and are acceptable to most patients in terms of methods of application, supporting oral hygiene efforts and financial costs. We believe that, with improved knowledge of the periodontopathic microbiota, with the availability of microbiological tests to identify periodontal pathogens and optimal therapy, with various safe and affordable yet effective antimicrobial agents and therapies and, eventually, with the development of one or more effective vaccines, the future looks very bright for patients at risk for or suffering from destructive periodontal disease.

Efficient antimicrobial treatment in periodontal maintenance care

BACKGROUND

The goal of follow-up care after periodontal therapy is to preserve the function of individual teeth and the dentition, ameliorate symptoms and simplify future surgery or make it unnecessary. Effective follow-up periodontal care depends on early diagnosis and treatment, as well as patient education.

RESULTS

The main determinants of successful periodontal maintenance therapy are dental professionals' ability to combat periodontal infections and patients' compliance with prescribed follow-up care. Mechanical and chemical antimicrobial intervention is the mainstay of preventive periodontal therapy. Chemotherapeutics alone are unlikely to be effective in the presence of subgingival calculus, underscoring the importance of subgingival mechanical débridement. Also, because toothbrushing and rinsing alone do not reach pathogens residing in periodontal pockets of increased depths, oral hygiene procedures should include subgingival treatment with home irrigators or other appropriate self-care remedies.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

When considering possible preventive therapies, dental professionals must weigh the risk of patients' acquiring destructive periodontal disease against potentially adverse effects, financial costs and inconvenience of the preventive treatment. The authors discuss theoretical and practical aspects of follow-up care for patients with periodontal disease. In addition, because it can be both difficult and expensive to control periodontal disease via conventional preventive measures alone, they present a new, simple and more cost-effective antimicrobial protocol for supportive periodontal therapy.

The effect of SRP on the clinical and microbiological parameters of periodontal diseases

The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the effect of SRP on clinical and microbiological parameters in 57 subjects with adult periodontitis (mean age 47 +/- 11 years). Subjects were monitored clinically and microbiologically prior to and 3, 6 and 9 months after full-mouth SRP under local anaesthesia. Clinical assessments of plaque, redness, suppuration, BOP, pocket depth and attachment level were made at 6 sites per tooth. The means of duplicate attachment level measurements taken at each visit were used to assess change between visits. Clinical data were averaged within each subject and then averaged across subjects for each visit. Subgingival plaque samples were taken from the mesial aspect of each tooth and the presence and levels of 40 subgingival taxa were determined using whole genomic DNA probes and checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. The mean levels and % of sites colonized by each species (prevalence) was computed for each subject at each visit. Differences in clinical and microbiological parameters before and after SRP were sought using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test or the Quade test for more than 2 visits. Overall, there was a mean gain in attachment level of 0.11 +/- 0.23 mm (range -0.53 to 0.64 mm) 3 months post-therapy. There was a significant decrease in the % of sites exhibiting gingival redness (68 to 57%) and BOP (58 to 52%) as well as a mean (+/-SEM) pocket depth (3.3 +/- 0.06 to 3.1 +/- 0.05 mm). Sites with pre-therapy pocket depths of < 4 mm showed a non-significant increase in pocket depth and attachment level, 4.6 mm pockets showed a significant decrease in pocket depth and a non-significant gain in attachment post-therapy, while > 6 mm pockets showed a significant decrease in pocket depth and attachment level measurements post-therapy. Significant clinical improvements were seen in subjects who had never smoked or were past smokers but not in current smokers. Mean prevalences and levels of P. gingivalis, T. denticola and B. forsythus were significantly reduced after SRP, while A. viscosus showed a significant increase in mean levels. The mean decrease in prevalence of P. gingivalis was similar at all pocket depth categories, while B. forsythus decreased more at shallow and intermediate pockets and A. viscosus increased most at deep sites. P. gingivalis. B. forsythus and T. denticola were equally prevalent among current, past and never smokers pre-therapy, decreased significantly post-SRP in never and past smokers but increased in current smokers. Clinical improvement post-SRP was accompanied by a modest change in the subgingival microbiota, primarily a reduction in P. gingivalis, B. forsythus and T. denticola, suggesting potential targets for therapy and indicating that radical alterations in the subgingival microbiota may not be necessary or desirable in many patients.

Microbiological response to mechanical treatment in combination with adjunctive therapy. A review of the literature

The recognition of the microbial origin and the specificity of periodontal infections has resulted in the development of several adjunctive therapies (antibiotics and/or antiseptics) to scaling and root planing in the treatment of chronic adult periodontitis. This article aims to review the "additional" effect of a subgingival irrigation with chlorhexidine, or a local or systemic application of tetracycline or metronidazole, performed in combination with a single course of scaling and root planing in patients with chronic adult periodontitis. All treatment modalities are compared with scaling and root planing, based on their impact on: the probing depth (PD); total number of colony forming units per ml (CFU/ml); the proportions and/or the detection-frequency of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Prevotella intermedia; and/or on the percentages of cocci, spirochetes, motile, and other micro-organisms on dark field microscopy examination. All treatment modalities, including scaling and root planing without additional chemical therapy, resulted in significant reductions in the probing depth and the proportions of periodontopathogens, at least during the first 8 weeks post-therapy. However in comparison to a single course of scaling and root planing, the supplementary effect of adjunctive therapies seems to be limited. In general, only the irrigation with chlorhexidine 2%, the local application of minocycline, and the systemic use of metronidazole (in case of large proportions of spirochetes) or doxycycline (in case of large proportions of A. actinomycetemcomitans) seem to result in a prolonged supplementary effect when compared to scaling and root planing. Therefore, the use of antibiotics on a routine basis, especially in a systemic way, in the treatment of chronic adult periodontitis, can no longer be advocated, considering the increasing danger for the development of microbial resistance.

Full- versus partial-mouth disinfection in the treatment of periodontal infections. A pilot study: long-term microbiological observations

A standard periodontal treatment consists of 4 to 6 scalings and rootplanings at a 1- to 2-week interval, which allows reinfection of a previously disinfected area before completion of the treatment. The present pilot study aims to examine the microbiological long-term effects of a full-mouth disinfection. 10 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were randomly allocated to a test and control group. The patients from the control group received scaling and rootplaning and oral hygiene instructions at a 2-week interval. The full-mouth disinfection (test group) consisted of a full-mouth scaling and rootplaning in 2 visits within 24 h in combination with: tongue brushing with 1% chlorhexidine gel for 1 min, mouth rinsing with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution for 2 min and subgingival irrigation of all pockets (3x in 10 min) with 1% chlorhexidine gel. The patients of the test group were instructed to rinse 2x daily with 0.2% chlorhexidine. Plaque samples were taken at baseline and after 1, 2, 4 and 8 months. Differential phase-contrast microscopy showed a significantly larger reduction of spirochetes and motile organisms in the test group up to month 2 for the single-rooted and up to month 8 for the multi-rooted teeth. Furthermore, the culture data supported the effectiveness of the new treatment strategy. In both groups, the number of anaerobic CFU decreased 1 log around single- and 0.5 log around multi-rooted teeth. The number of anaerobic CFU remained low in the test group, in contrast to the control group. At 1 month, the test group harboured a significantly (p<0.01) lower proportion of pathogenic organisms, but this difference disappeared with time. Moreover, the test sites showed a significantly higher (p<0.02) increase in the proportion of beneficial micro-organisms up to 4 months. These findings suggest that a full-mouth disinfection leads to a significant microbiological improvement up to 2 months, which could be consolidated, although not significant, for the next 6 months.

0.1%/0.2% commercial chlorhexidine solutions as subgingival irrigants in chronic periodontitis

This study compared 2 proprietary chlorhexidine (CH) products, Corsodyl (CO-0.2% CH, then ICI, U.K.) and Eludril (EL-0.1% CH, Pierre Fabre, France) as subgingival irrigants adjunctive to Simplified Oral Hygiene. 19 subjects, 8M, 11F, aged 30-57 years, mean 44 years, took part. Probing pocket depth (PPD) ranged from 5-10 mm, mean 6.5 mm (CO and EL), with 60 CO and 65 EL sites. After oral hygiene instruction, without stress on interdental cleaning, patients received on visit supra- and subgingival debridement, and instruction in subgingival irrigation using the Max-I-Probe system (Smith & Nephew MPL, USA). For baseline, days 28 (end of irrigation), 56 and 84, data were respectively: GI (medians): 1.7, 1.2, 1.2, 1.0 (CO), 1.9, 1.5, 1.3, 1.0 EL); BOP (medians): 1.2, 0.4, 0.7, 0.4 (CO), 1.5, 0.6, 0.6, 0.25 (EL); PPD (mm) (means): 6.3, 4.8, 4.2, 4.5 (CO), 6.8, 5.2, 5.3, 4.7 (EL); PAL (mm) (means-change relative to day 0): 0.6, 0.5, 0.8 (CO), 0.8, 0.8, 1.5 (EL). By Wilcoxon for non-parametric and t-tests for parametric data, both groups showed significant improvement for all variables at all times relative to baseline, with only one significant difference between the groups, in favour of EL, for PAL at day 84 (p < 0.05). This pilot study indicates that both simplified oral hygiene regimes are effective in periodontitis, but that there was no difference between the 2 commercial irrigants as adjunctives.

Evaluation of the efficacy of a redox agent in the treatment of chronic periodontitis

A redox dye, methylene blue, was compared with subgingival root surface debridement and sterile water in the treatment of adult periodontitis. Plaque and gingival indices, bleeding on probing, and microbiological samples were obtained at baseline, and at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks following treatment. All subjects had matched pockets in each of the 4 quadrants, of 5 mm or more. One treatment consisted of 0.1% methylene blue gel irrigated professionally at 0, 1 and 4 weeks, and by subjects at days in between up to 4 weeks, at chosen sites within a randomly selected quadrant (split-mouth design). A 2nd treatment was sterile water irrigation as above. A 3rd quadrant received subgingival debridement, and sites in the 4th received methylene blue incorporated into a slow-release device of a biodegradable collagen alginate vicryl composite. All sites showed improvements in clinical and microbiological parameters. However, no statistically significant differences between treatment types were found for clinical measurements. Although plaque index tended to increase after week 1, gingival index was reduced, as was the papilla bleeding index. Probing depth reductions were approximately 1.2 mm for all treatments. Microbiological variables showed an increase in cocci and a decrease in motile organisms for all groups, the latter reaching statistical significance for subgingival debridement. The reductions in spirochaetes were significant for subgingival debridement and methylene blue by slow-release. Culture demonstrated an increase in the aerobe:anaerobe ratio for all groups, which was statistically significant initially (weeks 1 and 4) for subgingival debridement. Methylene blue was also effective statistically in improving this ratio, both by irrigation and slow-release (week 4). Methylene blue also significantly reduced the numbers of black-pigmented anaerobes during the trial period, both by irrigation and slow-release, which sterile water and subgingival debridement failed to do. No serious adverse experiences were seen, however, significantly greater morbidity was associated with subgingival debridement. These results clearly demonstrate that in altering the microflora to one that is more compatible with periodontal health, methylene blue treatment is comparable, or even better, than the currently standard treatment of subgingival debridement, and is better tolerated.

Pulsated jet subgingival irrigation with 0.1% chlorhexidine, simplified oral hygiene and chronic periodontitis

This study investigated the efficacy of a 0.1% chlorhexidine preparation as an aid to a basic oral hygiene programme comprising only baseline root and crown debridement, instruction in bass brushing without emphasis on interdental cleaning, and pulsated mono-jet subgingival irrigation. Baseline data for plaque index, papilla bleeding index and probeable pocket depth were similar in both test and control groups. Mean values for all 3 parameters were clearly lower in the chlorhexidine group, both at the end of the period of active treatment and up to 2 months thereafter. These differences were statistically significant for P1I at day 28, PBI at day 56 and PPD at days 56 and 84, but not at day 168. Proportionately more sites generally showed improvement in the chlorhexidine group at all times. It was concluded that 0.1% chlorhexidine significantly enhances the effects of the practical oral hygiene regime described.

Effects of subgingival irrigation on periodontal status

Periodontal diseases are localized, plaque-related infections. Often, clinical signs of inflammation are not eradicated by supragingival plaque control, dictating that subgingival microbial populations must be reduced. Confirmation that it is possible to deliver medicaments to the base of deep pockets stimulated numerous investigations. This report evaluates the role of site-specific pharmacotherapy to enhance periodontal status.

Modes of application of anti-plaque chemicals

Because interdental and subgingival sites are relatively inaccessible to mouthrinsing, they necessitate alternative methods of application of anti-plaque chemicals. These include routine oral hygiene aids, surfactants to enhance uptake and retention of antimicrobials, gels and periodontal dressings. The principal modes of application that have received attention recently, apart from the systemic route, are syringe and pulsated jet irrigation and slow release compounds. Slow release devices currently receiving attention may be classified as membrane diffusion, solution of drug in polymer and solid drug dispersed in polymer matrix. The most widespread dental instance of a slow release device appears to be the use of varnishes and resins to carry fluoride. Recent attempts at devising improved methods of antimicrobial application include the testing of materials for their biodegradability or for their potential to adhere to mucosal surfaces. It is concluded that the potential exists for antimicrobials applied directly to the site of intended action to contribute significantly to dental health, particularly when employed as components of practical oral hygiene regimes.

Clinical effects on chronic periodontitis of a simplified system of oral hygiene including subgingival pulsated jet irrigation with chlorhexidine

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a simplified system of oral hygiene, comprising Bass brushing, scaling, root planing and subgingival irrigation using a pulsated monojet oral irrigator, in patients with chronic periodontitis. After initial assessment, patients received scaling, root planing and instruction in Bass brushing and in use of a pulsated jet oral irrigator (Water Pik + Imax attachment) to irrigate subgingivally. 11 patients with 262 approximal periodontal pockets used 0.02% chlorhexidine (CH), or a placebo as the irrigating solution once daily for 28 days. Plaque index (PlI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), and probing pocket depth (PPD) were assessed on days 0, 28, 56 and 84. Within procedure comparisons for all groups showed that the regime was highly effective in reducing PlI, SBI and PPD, improvements being maintained at least until day 84. Between procedure comparisons showed that benefits were improved only marginally by the use of 0.02% CH as the irrigation fluid. The patients found the procedure pleasant and neither injuries nor staining were noted during the study. It was concluded that this simplified oral hygiene system was effective in reducing periodontal inflammation and pocket depth, although no significant added benefit with 0.02% CH was apparent. The technique may be useful in patients who cannot achieve high levels of routine mechanical oral hygiene, particularly interdentially. The effects of using higher concentrations of chlorhexidine should be investigated.