A comparison of 3 clinical indices for measuring gingivitis

Prevalência e severidade de gengivite em escolares de 7 a 14 anos: condições locais associadas ao sangramento à sondagem

O objetivo deste estudo foi coletar dados sobre a prevalência e severidade de gengivite em uma amostra de crianças em idade escolar, bem como sua relação com possíveis fatores de risco locais. Duzentos e seis indivíduos foram examinados, sendo 107 meninos e 99 meninas, com idades entre 7 e 14 anos; foram coletados dados referentes ao índice de placa (IP), índice gengival (IG) e profundidade clínica de sondagem (PCS). Entre os parâmetros clínicos observados, as médias referentes a PCS, IP e IG encontradas foram de 1,58 + 0,46, 1,12 + 0,49 e 0,89 + 0,32, respectivamente. Noventa e cinco indivíduos (46,1%) apresentaram um quadro de gengivite leve e 111 (53,9%), de gengivite moderada. No geral, os indivíduos do sexo masculino apresentaram estatisticamente maior quantidade de placa bacteriana e maior inflamação do tecido gengival que indivíduos do sexo feminino. A presença de inflamação gengival foi encontrada em todos os indivíduos examinados. A severidade de inflamação nos dentes permanentes esteve diretamente relacionada à quantidade de placa e ao sangramento à sondagem.

Clinical, histological, and microbiological findings in peri-implant disease: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

This study is intended to verify the correlation among clinical indices of the peri-implant soft tissues, the histological condition and the presence of 3 pathogens commonly associated with peri-implant diseases (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Tannerella forsythia).

MATERIALS

Four clinical indices, Gingival Index (GI), Sulcus Bleeding Index, GI modified by Mombelli, and Plaque Index modified by Mombelli (mPI) were evaluated around 1 dental implant of each subject (n = 10). Subgingival plaque was collected for bacterial analysis (polymerase chain reaction) and a biopsy of peri-implant soft tissues for histological analysis was harvested. The clinical indices and detected pathogens correlated with a developed histological index (HI).

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant relationship between the clinical indices (GI, Sulcus Bleeding Index, and GI modified by Mombelli) and the HI, except for the mPI on the central area of lingual aspects (r = 0.85, P = 0.0029). There was a tendency for a positive correlation between the mPI on the central area of buccal aspects and the HI (r = 0.63, P = 0.0544). The counting of lymphocytes and plasmocytes correlated positively with HI, thus suggesting the index reliability. The prevalence of A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, and T. forsythia did not present a significant relationship with the HI.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small number of samples and the poor statistical significance, the mPI seems to be useful for evaluation of inflammatory severity on soft tissue around dental implants as demonstrated by its relationship with the HI. Further studies are necessary to elucidate this subject.

A systematic review of professional mechanical plaque removal for prevention of periodontal diseases

AIM

To investigate the effect of professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) on the prevention of periodontal diseases.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies from 1950 to October 2004. Screening and data abstraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. Critical appraisal of studies was based on objective criteria and evidence tables were constructed.

RESULTS

From 2179 titles and abstracts, 132 full-text articles were screened and 32 studies were relevant. Evidence exists that PMPR in adults, particularly in combination with oral hygiene instruction (OHI), may be more effective than no treatment judged by surrogate measures. The evidence for a benefit of PMPR+OHI over OHI alone is less clear. The optimum frequency of PMPR has not been investigated although more frequent PMPR is associated with improved markers of health. The strength of evidence for these results ranges from weak to moderate due to risk of bias, inconsistent results, lack of appropriate statistics and small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be little value in providing PMPR without OHI. In fact, repeated OHI might have a similar effect as PMPR. Some forms of PMPR might achieve greater patient satisfaction. There is little difference in beneficial or adverse effects of different methods of PMPR.

Clinical and microbiological effects of local chlorhexidine applications

AIM

To study the effects of an application of chlorhexidine varnish (40%) on dental plaque.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled clinical trial.

SUBJECTS

40 patients (50% females), aged 25-34 years after undergoing any necessary restorative treatment. Exactly one half of these individuals practiced good oral hygiene, the efforts of the others were poor.

METHOD

Test groups received a chlorhexidine varnish application, the control group received a placebo varnish. Initially and after 2 and 6 weeks, a modified Dentocult SM-test, bleeding on probing, and a plaque index (Quigley-Hein) were recorded.

RESULTS

In contrast to the control group, improvements in plaque index and bleeding on probing scores were found in patients with poor oral hygiene. The results of the Dentocult SM-tests showed a considerable reduction of streptococcus colonisation. The test group with good oral hygiene showed only slight improvement of the examined indices after chlorhexidine application. The index parameters of all patients of the placebo groups remained unchanged over the examination time period.

CONCLUSION

The application of a chlorhexidine varnish reduced the quantity of the Streptococcus mutans colonies significantly and improved clinical parameters in patients with elevated plaque accumulation.

Identification and consequences of distinct Löe-Silness gingival index examiner styles for the clinical assessment of gingivitis

BACKGROUND

In clinical studies, gingivitis is most frequently assessed by the Löe-Silness gingival index (GI). The objective of this work was to develop an understanding of how clinicians experienced with GI differ with respect to how they apply GI and to assess the impact of different examination styles on statistical outcomes and magnitude of treatment differences.

METHODS

A method was developed to mathematically relate the average GI score and degree of bleeding observed for a subject. Graphical analyses were used to profile examiner styles with respect to using the GI index. A prospective single-center, examiner-blind study comparing the effects of a staggered prophylaxis on gingivitis was then conducted, where a difference in gingivitis was created between two balanced groups by providing subjects a prophylaxis at two staggered time points. Subjects were assigned to one of two cohorts; within each cohort, group 1 subjects received a dental prophylaxis following the baseline examination and group 2 subjects received a dental prophylaxis 8 weeks later. Five to 7 days after the group 2 prophylaxis, all subjects were examined for GI. Twelve experienced clinicians participated.

RESULTS

Retrospective analyses indicated the presence of distinct examiner styles which are based on the frequency that a given GI score (0, 1, 2, or 3) is measured by a clinician. In the prospective study, all 12 examiners observed statistically significant differences between the prophylaxis treatment groups at the final visit for both mean number of bleeding sites and mean GI; the magnitude ranged from 21.5% to 84.6% for mean number of bleeding sites and 9.4% to 39.2% for mean GI. There were 4 distinct styles employed by these experienced clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Varying examiner styles impact the structure of resulting data. Importantly, the implementation of arbitrary thresholds (e.g., 20%) regarding percent treatment differences between groups as a guideline for judging the clinical significance is scientifically unsupported. A more scientific criterion in the field of gingivitis clinical testing would be the independent demonstration of statistical superiority compared to a negative control and/or a demonstration of similar or superior efficacy to clinically proven positive controls. In addition, interexaminer calibration is a mechanism that can be utilized to minimize the impact of different examiner styles in clinical settings involving more than one examiner.

Comparing measures of reliability for indices of gingivitis and plaque

The purpose of this methodological study was to compare methods used to assess reliability for gingival inflammation and plaque. Duplicate examinations were conducted by one examiner on 17 subjects (506 scoring sites), using the gingival index (GI), bleeding points index (BPI), and plaque index (PI). The percentage of agreement, the weighted and unweighted kappa coefficients, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated as statistics of reliability for mesial buccal site scores and whole mouth mean scores when appropriate. For mesial buccal sites the respective values of the GI, BPI, and PI for weighted kappas were: 0.47, 0.49, and 0.75; for the correlation coefficients: 0.47, 0.49, and 0.76; for unweighted kappas, 0.39, 0.49, and 0.39; and for percentage of agreement 66.2%, 76.1%, and 51.2%. For whole mouth means the correlation coefficients for the GI, BPI, and PI were 0.87, 0.59, and 0.87, respectively. In conclusion, the most useful statistics in assessing the intraexaminer reliability of a solo examiner in descending order were the weighted kappa coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, the unweighted kappa coefficient, and percentage of agreement.

Suitability of gingival indices for use in therapeutic trials. Is bleeding a sine qua non?

A number of gingival indices have been described which include visual and invasive components, either separately or in combination. In selecting indices for use in gingivitis therapeutic trials, some investigators maintain that only invasive indices should be used, since indices that include a bleeding-on-provocation component are deemed to be the most objective. Other investigators, however, maintain that non-invasive indices are the more appropriate insofar as invasive procedures will not only disrupt the plaque at the gingival margin, but could also mildly traumatize the tissue and present an impediment to assessing examiner standardization and reproducibility. This paper discusses these aspects of gingivitis evaluation. The data indicate that all validated indices, whether invasive or non-invasive, have some degree of both objectivity and subjectivity. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate index will depend upon the ability of a given index to achieve the objectives of the clinical trial in which it is to be utilized.

Issues in the evaluation of clinical trials of periodontitis: a clinical perspective

The goals of clinical trials designed to establish claims for equivalency or superiority of treatment for periodontitis must be clearly stated and defined in terms of measurable and meaningful response variables. It is suggested that these clinical trials use designs that compare new treatment methods to basic periodontal therapy which consists of thorough scaling and root planing, oral hygiene instruction, and regular maintenance care. The primary response variable should be clinical attachment level. It is important to document changes in probing depth since this is a meaningful measure to many clinicians. Gingival inflammation and bleeding should be used as secondary response variables because these are not necessarily indicative of progressive periodontal destruction. Radiographic measures of disease may be useful as primary response variables if safe, reproducible and valid methods of measuring change are utilized. Microbiological monitoring should be a secondary response variable because of numerous questions concerning sampling methodology, quantitative expression of data, and meaningful interpretation in terms of relevance to disease activity. The length of periodontitis trials should be set at a minimum of 9 months if claims of superiority or equivalency are made compared to basic periodontal therapy. Calibration trials should be included and measurement error should be expressed in terms that are meaningful to the clinician while retaining statistical validity. Statistical methods for determining change should take into account site and subject heterogeneity, bursts of change and gradual change over time. It is important that statistical techniques be used that detect change as early as possible and that appropriate consideration be given to the clinical implications of the type, magnitude and duration of change in outcome variables.

Correlations among gingival indices: a methodology study

Using an experimental gingivitis model, 99 subjects completed a 3-week study to determine the correlations between a visual index of gingivitis, the Modified Gingival Index (MGI), and the Gingival Index (GI), the Interdental Bleeding Index (IBI), and the Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI). Following a baseline examination consisting of the MGI and either the GI, IBI, or PBI, each subject received a full mouth scaling and rubber cup polishing to render the teeth plaque and calculus free. Subjects then rinsed twice daily for 30 seconds with 20 ml of either an active antimicrobial or control mouthrinse for 3 weeks while abstaining from all other oral hygiene. The MGI correlated significantly with the GI, IBI, and PBI, both at baseline and at 3 weeks for all subjects.