Comparisons of modalities of mechanical stimulation with a toothbrush on improvement of oxygen sufficiency in dog gingiva

Toothbrushing and gingival recession

AIM

To review the hypothesis that toothbrushing leads to gingival recession. Gingival recession develops due to anatomical and pathological factors. The prevalence of recession is dependent on the age and characteristic of the population because it usually presents in individuals with periodontal disease or those who practise zealous or improper oral hygiene methods. Gingival trauma and gingival abrasion from toothbrushing is thought to progress directly to gingival recession. Case studies documenting recession from toothbrush trauma are speculative. Short-term studies suggest that gingival trauma and gingival abrasion may result from toothbrushing, but the direct relationship between traumatic home care and gingival recession is inconclusive. Long-term studies remain elusive or do not support the development of recession following toothbrushing. Nevertheless, tooth abrasion may be an integral part in the aetiology of recession. Toothbrush abrasion also may cause wear at the cemento-enamel junction resulting in the destruction of the supporting periodontium leading to recession.

Effect of mechanical toothbrush stimulation on gingival microcirculatory functions in inflamed gingiva of dogs

The effect of mechanical toothbrush stimulation on gingival microcirculatory functions was examined with and without removal of supragingival plaque in inflamed gingiva of 6 dogs. After removal of the ligatures, 4 treatment modalities: mechanical stimulation by vibration (MS), removal of supragingival plaque (PR), combination (MS+PR) and no treatment (NT), were administered to each quadrant for 2 weeks. Both quadrants with plaque removal showed a marked decrease in the gingival index score, while slight and moderate decreases were observed in NT and MS quadrants, respectively. Changes in gingival crevicular fluid flow, pocket oxygen tension and hemoglobin oxygen saturation in the gingiva were significant in the MS, PR and MS+PR quadrants. Significant treatment-by-time effects were found for all of the parameters of microcirculatory function between NT and MS quadrants, and gingival crevicular fluid flow between PR and MS+PR quadrants, respectively. These findings suggest that mechanical stimulation with a toothbrush may offer an additional benefit to gingival microcirculatory functions in inflamed gingiva.