Oral health promotion for institutionalised elderly

The impact of health education interventions on oral health promotion among older people: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

One of the most common pathologic changes in older people is oral and dental problems. The oral health of older people is a public health concern. Promotion of good oral health for this cohort will have beneficial impacts on the longer-term quality of life. This study aimed to identify the types of health education interventions for the oral health of older people and to determine their effects on the oral and dental health of older people.

METHODS

Potential articles were retrieved from four electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Embase) up to 31 September 2022 in English without limit of time. Experimental and quasi-experimental interventional studies investigating the impact of educational interventions on oral and dental health among older people over 60 years old in both sexes were considered. The quality assessment tool was the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP).

RESULTS

In the initial search, 1104 articles were retrieved. Finally, according to the inclusion criteria, 23 studies (seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCT) and six quasi-experimental studies) were reviewed. In this review, educational interventions for older people and their caregivers are classified. Theoretical frameworks were used in only three interventions related to older people. Outcome measures were both self-reported and objective measures. Fifteen of the included studies were of moderate quality.

CONCLUSION

This review provides evidence that the use of oral and dental health educational interventions was effective in improving the oral health of older people. Educational interventions were carried out both among older people and among their caregivers. Although a variety of interventions were used in the reviewed studies, more lectures were used in the interventions related to older people. In the interventions related to caregivers, in addition to lectures, practical education was also used. It is recommended to perform higher quality studies for assessing the effectiveness of interventions in this field.

Interventions for improving oral health in people after stroke

BACKGROUND

For people with physical, sensory and cognitive limitations due to stroke, the routine practice of oral health care (OHC) may become a challenge. Evidence-based supported oral care intervention is essential for this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of OHC interventions with usual care or other treatment options for ensuring oral health in people after a stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group and Cochrane Oral Health Group trials registers, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and six other databases in February 2019. We scanned reference lists from relevant papers and contacted authors and researchers in the field. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant articles and contacted other researchers. There were no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated one or more interventions designed to improve the cleanliness and health of the mouth, tongue and teeth in people with a stroke who received assisted OHC led by healthcare staff. We included trials with a mixed population provided we could extract the stroke-specific data. The primary outcomes were dental plaque or denture plaque. Secondary outcomes included presence of oral disease, presence of related infection and oral opportunistic pathogens related to OHC and pneumonia, stroke survivor and providers' knowledge and attitudes to OHC, and patient satisfaction and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened abstracts and full-text articles according to prespecified selection criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. We sought clarification from investigators when required. Where suitable statistical data were available, we combined the selected outcome data in pooled meta-analyses. We used GRADE to assess the quality of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifteen RCTs (22 randomised comparisons) involving 3631 participants with data for 1546 people with stroke met the selection criteria. OHC interventions compared with usual care Seven trials (2865 participants, with data for 903 participants with stroke, 1028 healthcare providers, 94 informal carers) investigated OHC interventions compared with usual care. Multi-component OHC interventions showed no evidence of a difference in the mean score (DMS) of dental plaque one month after the intervention was delivered (DMS -0.66, 95% CI -1.40 to 0.09; 2 trials, 83 participants; I² = 83%; P = 0.08; very low-quality evidence). Stroke survivors had less plaque on their dentures when staff had access to the multi-component OHC intervention (DMS -1.31, 95% CI -1.96 to -0.66; 1 trial, 38 participants; P < 0.0001; low-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in gingivitis (DMS -0.60, 95% CI -1.66 to 0.45; 2 trials, 83 participants; I² = 93%; P = 0.26: very low-quality evidence) or denture-induced stomatitis (DMS -0.33, 95% CI -0.92 to 0.26; 1 trial, 38 participants; P = 0.69; low-quality evidence) among participants receiving the multi-component OHC protocol compared with usual care one month after the intervention. There was no difference in the incidence of pneumonia in participants receiving a multi-component OHC intervention (99 participants; 5 incidents of pneumonia) compared with those receiving usual care (105 participants; 1 incident of pneumonia) (OR 4.17, CI 95% 0.82 to 21.11; 1 trial, 204 participants; P = 0.08; low-quality evidence). OHC training for stroke survivors and healthcare providers significantly improved their OHC knowledge at one month after training (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.35; 3 trials, 728 participants; I² = 94%; P = 0.03; very low-quality evidence). Pooled data one month after training also showed evidence of a difference between stroke survivor and providers' oral health attitudes (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.54; 3 trials, 728 participants; I² = 65%; P = 0.06; very low-quality evidence). OHC interventions compared with placebo Three trials (394 participants, with data for 271 participants with stroke) compared an OHC intervention with placebo. There were no data for primary outcomes. There was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of pneumonia in participants receiving an OHC intervention compared with placebo (OR 0.39, CI 95% 0.14 to 1.09; 2 trials, 242 participants; I² = 42%; P = 0.07; low-quality evidence). However, decontamination gel reduced the incidence of pneumonia among the intervention group compared with placebo gel group (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.84; 1 trial, 203 participants; P = 0.028). There was no difference in the incidence of pneumonia in participants treated with povidone-iodine compared with a placebo (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.18 to 3.51; 1 trial, 39 participants; P = 0.77). One OHC intervention compared with another OHC intervention Twelve trials (372 participants with stroke) compared one OHC intervention with another OHC intervention. There was no difference in dental plaque scores between those participants that received an enhanced multi-component OHC intervention compared with conventional OHC interventions at three months (MD -0.04, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.25; 1 trial, 61 participants; P = 0.78; low-quality evidence). There were no data for denture plaque.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low- to very low-quality evidence suggesting that OHC interventions can improve the cleanliness of patient's dentures and stroke survivor and providers' knowledge and attitudes. There is limited low-quality evidence that selective decontamination gel may be more beneficial than placebo at reducing the incidence of pneumonia. Improvements in the cleanliness of a patient's own teeth was limited. We judged the quality of the evidence included within meta-analyses to be low or very low quality, and this limits our confidence in the results. We still lack high-quality evidence of the optimal approach to providing OHC to people after stroke.

An evaluation of health workforce models addressing oral health in residential aged care facilities: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In Australia and globally, there is an increasing problem of unmet oral health needs of older people above 65 residing in aged care facilities. Various workforce models have been trialled to implement oral health care programmes in aged care facilities, but the evidence behind these programmes and their underlying workforce models is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on the effectiveness, and economic feasibility of the current workforce models addressing oral care in aged care facilities.

METHODS

CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMB Reviews, NHS Economic Evaluation Database and grey literature were searched. Studies were included if they described an oral health workforce model with a clinical intervention and defined oral health outcome measures. Analysis was conducted using the NHMRC guidelines for scientific and economic evaluations.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included. Four distinct workforce models of care were identified. 60% of the studies demonstrated short-term effectiveness in clinical measures. Workforce models were similar in their effectiveness, with varying levels of quality within each model. Although three studies considered individual components of economic feasibility, only one provided a comprehensive economic analysis of both the costs and health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS

All workforce models of care had some positive impact on oral health for residents of aged care. Oral health should be included as a health focus in age care facilities. Future studies should include longer-term health outcomes with rigorous economic analysis to ensure sustainably delivered workforce models of care for oral health management within aged care.

Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents

BACKGROUND

Associations between nursing home residents' oral health status and quality of life, respiratory tract infections, and nutritional status have been reported. Educational interventions for nurses or residents, or both, focusing on knowledge and skills related to oral health management may have the potential to improve residents' oral health.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff or residents, or both, to maintain or improve the oral health of nursing home residents.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register (to 18 January 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library, 2015, Issue 12), MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to 18 January 2016), Embase Ovid (1980 to 18 January 2016), CINAHL EBSCO (1937 to 18 January 2016), and Web of Science Conference Proceedings (1990 to 18 January 2016). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials to 18 January 2016. In addition, we searched reference lists of identified articles and contacted experts in the field. We placed no restrictions on language or date of publication when searching the electronic databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs comparing oral health educational programmes for nursing staff or residents, or both with usual care or any other oral healthcare intervention.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened articles retrieved from the searches for relevance, extracted data from included studies, assessed risk of bias for each included study, and evaluated the overall quality of the evidence. We retrieved data about the development and evaluation processes of complex interventions on the basis of the Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2). We contacted authors of relevant studies for additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs involving 3253 nursing home residents in this review; seven of these trials used cluster randomisation. The mean resident age ranged from 78 to 86 years across studies, and most participants were women (more than 66% in all studies). The proportion of residents with dental protheses ranged from 62% to 87%, and the proportion of edentulous residents ranged from 32% to 90% across studies.Eight studies compared educational interventions with information and practical components versus (optimised) usual care, while the ninth study compared educational interventions with information only versus usual care. All interventions included educational sessions on oral health for nursing staff (five trials) or for both staff and residents (four trials), and used more than one active component. Follow-up of included studies ranged from three months to five years.No study showed overall low risk of bias. Four studies had a high risk of bias, and the other five studies were at unclear risk of bias.None of the trials assessed our predefined primary outcomes 'oral health' and 'oral health-related quality of life'. All trials assessed our third primary outcome, 'dental or denture plaque'. Meta-analyses showed no evidence of a difference between interventions and usual care for dental plaque (mean difference -0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.26 to 0.17; six trials; 437 participants; low quality evidence) or denture plaque (standardised mean difference -0.60, 95% CI -1.25 to 0.05; five trials; 816 participants; low quality evidence). None of the studies assessed adverse events of the intervention.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence to draw robust conclusions about the effects of oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents. We did not find evidence of meaningful effects of educational interventions on any measure of residents' oral health; however, the quality of the available evidence is low. More adequately powered and high-quality studies using relevant outcome measures are needed.

Denture care of in-patients

The attitude of nursing staff to the denture care of in-patients in hospital following the introduction of written guidelines on denture care was assessed together with the need for further guidelines. A survey in the form of a questionnaire was carried out on 100 nursing staff in a general hospital. The topics covered included usefulness of the guidelines and denture hygiene and general denture care procedures on the ward together with aspects of general denture care included in the nurse training programme. There was a 66% response rate. The results highlighted that the introduction of written guidelines were helpful to the nursing staff but additional training was requested. A computer-aided learning (CAL) programme on denture care aimed specifically at nursing was then developed. A total of 81 nursing staff were surveyed following the introduction of the CAL programme. The results demonstrated that the CAL programme was well received by 100% of the staff surveyed. Further work is to be undertaken on the development of an oral-health educational programme for nursing staff.

Improving Oral Hygiene in Institutionalised Elderly by Educating Their Caretakers in Bangalore City, India: a Randomised Control Trial

Background

The population of older people, as well as the number of dependent older people, is steadily increasing; those unable to live independently at home are being cared for in a range of settings. Practical training for nurses and auxiliary care staff has frequently been recommended as a way of improving oral health care for functionally dependent elderly. The aim was improve oral hygiene in institutionalized elderly in Bangalore city by educating their caregivers.

Methods

The study is a cluster randomized intervention trial with an elderly home as unit of randomization in which 7 out of 65 elderly homes were selected. Oral health knowledge of caregivers was assessed using a pre-tested pro forma and later oral-health education was provided to the caregivers of the study group. Oral hygiene status of elderly residents was assessed by levels of debris, plaque of dentate and denture plaque, and denture stomatitis of denture wearing residents, respectively. Oral-health education to the caregivers of control group was given at the end of six months

Results

There was significant improvement in oral-health knowledge of caregivers from the baseline and also a significant reduction of plaque score from baseline score of 3.17 ± 0.40 to 1.57 ± 0.35 post-intervention (p < .001), debris score 2.87 ± 0.22 to 1.49 ± 0.34 (p < .001), denture plaque score 3.15 ± 0.47 to 1.21 ± 0.27 (p < .001), and denture stomatitis score 1.43 ± 0.68 to 0.29 ± 0.53 (p < .001).

Conclusions

The result of the present study showed that there was a significant improvement in the oral-health knowledge among the caregivers and oral-hygiene status of the elderly residents.

Oral health care education and its effect on caregivers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The population of older people as well as the number of dependent older people is steadily increasing. Those unable to live independently at home are being cared for in a range of settings. Practical training for nurses and auxiliary care staff has frequently been recommended as a way of improving oral health care for functionally dependent elderly.

AIM

To evaluate an oral health education program for the caretakers of institutionalized elderly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a cluster randomized intervention trial with an elderly home as the unit of randomization. Seven out of 65 elderly homes accommodating a total of 78 caretakers and 462 elderly residents were selected in Bangalore city, India, out of which 3 elderly homes were assigned to the intervention group and 4 to the control group. Oral health knowledge of caretakers was assessed using a pre-tested proforma; later, oral health education was provided to the caretakers of the intervention group. Oral health education was given at the end of 6 months to the caretakers of the control group. Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and paired proportion test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in the oral health knowledge of the caretakers from baseline in the interventional group.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study showed that there was a significant improvement in the oral health knowledge among the caretakers. Educating the caretakers for assisting or enabling residents for maintaining oral hygiene is essential.

Urban legends series: oral candidosis

Candida species (spp) are commensal yeast that can only instigate oral infection (oral candidosis - OC) when there is an underlying predisposing condition in the host. We investigated four controversial topics on OC: (i) How can a microbiological determination of OC be made as Candida spp. are commensal yeasts and not all of them form hyphae or pseudohyphae during infection? (ii) Is median rhomboid glossitis (MRG) a manifestation of candidal infection? (iii) Can candidal infection cause palate papillary hyperplasia (PPH)? (iv) What is the best therapeutic treatment for denture-associated erythematous stomatitis (DAES)? Results from extensive literature searches, including a systematic review, suggested the following: (i) the diagnosis of OC merely on the basis of the presence of yeasts is an oversimplification of a complex process. No convincing evidence of a single test or method better able to discriminate the transition from candidal saprophytism to pathogenicity has been reported in the literature; (ii-iii) conclusive evidence of a direct aetiopathogenic relationship between MRG and PPH and candidal infection has not been found; and (iv) only limited evidence is available for any DAES treatment, thus making it impossible to make strong therapeutic recommendations.

Undergraduate geriatric education through community service learning

INTRODUCTION

Despite the exponential growth of the elderly population worldwide, geriatric education has been a formal component of only a few dental schools' curricula.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the geriatric community service learning (CSL) component of the professionalism and community service (PACS) module, and to explore a CSL project carried out by a group of first year dental students at a long-term care facility.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to present and describe the CSL component of the PACS module. Students' personal reflections were used to illustrate some of the joys and challenges of experiencing a long-term care facility environment.

RESULTS

The newly developed PACS module combines community service learning with the long-term care experience. Students develop, apply and evaluate an educational health promotion activity in a long-term care facility.

CONCLUSIONS

The PACS module has encouraged students to acquire comprehensive knowledge and awareness of the needs and dynamics of a long-term care as they collaboratively interacted with personnel from the facility to develop their projects. The authors would like to engage other schools in discussing the need to integrate community-based geriatric education into their dental curricula.

Provision of mouth-care in long-term care facilities: an educational trial

OBJECTIVES

This randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of a pyramid-based education for improving the oral health of elders in long-term care (LTC) facilities.

METHODS

Fourteen facilities matched for size were assigned randomly to an active or control group. At baseline in each facility, care-aides in the active group participated with a full-time nurse educator in a seminar about oral health care, and had unlimited access to the educator for oral health-related advice throughout the 3-month trial. Care-aides in the control group participated in a similar seminar with a dental hygienist but they received no additional advice. The residents in the facilities at baseline and after 3 months were examined clinically to measure their oral hygiene, gingival health, masticatory potential, Body Mass Index and Malnutrition Indicator Score, and asked to report on chewing difficulties.

RESULTS

Clinical measures after 3 months were not significantly different from baseline in either group, indicating that education neither influenced the oral health nor the dental hygiene of the residents.

CONCLUSIONS

A pyramid-based educational scheme with nurses and care-aides did not improve the oral health of frail elders in this urban sample of LTC facilities.

Staff-led interventions for improving oral hygiene in patients following stroke

BACKGROUND

For people with limitations due to neurological conditions such as stroke, the routine practice of oral care may become a challenge. Evidence-based supported oral care intervention is essential for this patient group.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of staff-led oral care interventions with standard care for ensuring oral hygiene for individuals after a stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the trials registers of the Cochrane Stroke Group and Oral Health Group (August 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2006), CINAHL (1982 to February 2006), Research Findings Electronic Register (February 2006), National Research Register (Issue 1, 2006), ISI Science and Technology Proceedings (August 2005), Dissertation Abstracts and Conference Papers Index (August 2005). We scanned reference lists from relevant papers and contacted authors and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We identified randomised controlled trials that evaluated one or more interventions designed to improve oral hygiene. Trials based on a mixed population were included, provided it was possible to extract the data specific to the individuals post stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently classified identified trials according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed the trial quality and extracted data. Clarification was sought from study authors when required.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight eligible randomised controlled trials were identified but only one provided stroke-specific information. It compared an oral health care education training programme (OHCE) delivered to nursing home care assistants to delayed training intervention in the control group. Comparisons were made at one and six months after the intervention, using the primary outcome measures dental plaque and denture plaque, and three secondary outcomes. The data available for the 67 individuals with a stroke (obtained from the larger cluster randomised controlled trial) showed that denture plaque scores were significantly reduced up to six months (p < 0.00001) after the intervention. Staff knowledge (P = 0.0008) and attitudes (P = 0.0001) towards oral care also improved significantly.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on one study with a small number of stroke survivors, providing oral care training for carers in a nursing home setting improves their knowledge of and attitudes towards the provision of oral care. In turn, residents' dentures were cleaner, though other oral hygiene measures did not change. Further evidence relating to oral care interventions is severely lacking, in particular with reference to care in hospital for those following stroke.

Caring for elderly long-term care patients: oral health-related concerns and issues

Much work is needed to resolve the many issues of prevention in the complex environment of long-term care facilities and to provide effective curative care for individuals, no matter how frail, who could benefit from comprehensive dental services.

The effect of chlorhexidine acetate/xylitol chewing gum on the plaque and gingival indices of elderly occupants in residential homes

AIM

A randomised, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted to investigate the effect of a chlorhexidine acetate/xylitol gum (ACHX) on the plaque and gingival indices of 111 elderly occupants in residential homes. A gum containing xylitol alone (X) and a no gum (N) group was included. Participants' opinions about chewing gum were also investigated.

METHODS

Subjects chewed 2 pellets, for 15 min, 2x daily for 12 months.

RESULTS

In the ACHX group, the plaque and gingival indices significantly decreased (p<0.001) over the 12 months. In the X group, only the plaque score significantly decreased (p<0.05) and in the N control group, both indices remained high and did not change significantly. The acceptance of both chewing gums was high but more participants in the ACHX group felt that the gum kept their mouth healthy (p<0.05). The effect of the ACHX gum on plaque and gingival indices was significantly greater than for the X gum.

CONCLUSION

The long-term use of a chlorhexidine acetate/xylitol chewing gum may therefore support oral hygiene routines for an elderly dependent population.

The index of ADOH: concept of measuring oral self-care functioning in the elderly

Measures of ability, or function, are used in the health field to determine the level of performance of a specific task, assess the loss of function, and to measure the return to function as a result of rehabilitation or interventions. While these measures are important to all age groups, it is the elderly and chronically ill who are at most risk for adverse changes in their health and functional status. The Index of the Activities of Daily Oral Hygiene (ADOH) is an instrument to assess and monitor functional dependency in manipulating aids used in oral self-care. It is part of the overall concept of oral self-care which subsumes function, education and training, and compliance in achieving and maintaining oral health. The purpose of the Index of ADOH is two-fold: to assess a subject for the progressive loss of the physical ability to manipulate the aids used in oral self-care, and to measure the return to function in response to care intervention and rehabilitative services. These manipulative tasks are associated with flossing, brushing, topical fluoride application, and the use of oral rinses. Aside from changes in function, the Index of ADOH can be used by health care providers and administrators to project the need for services or support for home care.

Evaluation of an oral health education program for nursing personnel in special housing facilities for the elderly. Part II: Clinical aspects

In Sweden, efforts are being made to create strategies for evaluating realistic dental treatment needs among the elderly, who are retaining more natural teeth. These strategies focus on the importance of maintaining adequate oral hygiene. Elderly in long-term-care facilities often depend on nursing personnel for carrying out daily oral hygiene procedures. Therefore, the nursing personnel's knowledge about and attitudes toward oral health make oral health education for health care professionals an important concern. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical oral health outcome in residents after their caregivers had undergone a one-session, four-hour oral health education program. The study consisted of an intervention with a pre- and a post-test and was carried out in three municipalities in the southwestern part of Sweden. A newly developed oral health screening protocol was carried out for 170 subjects living in long-term-care facilities both before and 3-4 months after nursing personnel had attended an oral health education program. Following the intervention, a statistically significant improvement was recorded for changes in oral mucosal color, a modified plaque index which measured oral hygiene status, and a mucosal index which recorded mucosal inflammation. This study indicated that a limited, one-session, four-hour oral health education, offered to caregivers within long-term-care facilities, had a positive impact on the oral health status of residents.

An evaluation of an oral health training programme for carers of the elderly in residential homes

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were: to evaluate carers' knowledge of oral health; to provide a high quality, consistent, oral health training programme for carers in residential homes; to evaluate the quality of this programme by examining both carers' changes in knowledge and any changes in carers' behaviour as reported by residents and to assess any changes in the oral health of the elderly residents after one year.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, multi-centre study using a carer training programme, evaluated by both a questionnaire conducted with carers and residents and oral examination of residents.

SETTING

In August 1996, 20 (20%) of the residential/nursing homes, in West Hertfordshire were chosen at random and all managers contacted and offered an oral examination for all their residents. Ten (10%) of the homes were also offered an oral health training programme for their carers. Eighteen homes accepted the oral examination for all consenting residents and 7 of the 10 homes offered accepted the carer training.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-nine carers from 7 of the residential homes attended an oral health training course and 213 elderly residents in the 18 homes were examined both at baseline and after 12 months.

RESULTS

Carers' baseline knowledge about oral health was poor; the oral health training programme was enjoyed and their knowledge gain after one week was high. However, the elderly residents perceived no change in the oral care given by carers either after one week or after one year and there was no measurable improvement in the oral health of residents after carer training, except for an increase in filled coronal surfaces. Few of the carers originally trained were still working in the same residential homes after one year.

CONCLUSION

Although the carer training programme was well received, no changes in oral health practice resulted. Barriers to practice of oral care by carers remained and training, even when including practical skills, evaluation by peers and a high knowledge gain, failed to reduce these barriers.

Attitudes of carers and the elderly occupants of residential homes to antimicrobial chewing gum as an aid to oral health

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes of elderly residents to using an antimicrobial chewing gum as an aid to oral health, and the opinion of their carers on such a procedure.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, multi-centre survey using a structured interview/questionnaire conducted with elderly residents and their carers.

SETTING

In January 1998, 9 residential/nursing homes were chosen at random from all the homes in West Hertfordshire, 207 residents were asked to chew two pieces of gum twice daily for 7 days.

SUBJECTS

The participants, 148 women and 59 men, were aged between 53-100 years (mean age 82.23 +/- 9.62 years). 47 carers, all female, were involved in distributing and collecting the gum.

RESULTS

122 residents (58.9%) were edentulous and 85 (41%) of the participants were partially dentate. Of those with teeth 23 (27%) had 21 teeth or more. 73 (35.2%) residents found that chewing the gum was difficult with 37 (17.9%) of this group being unable to chew (P < 0.0001 for those residents with no teeth/dentures or dentures unopposed by teeth or other dentures). 32 (18.6%) subjects disliked the flavour of the gum. Of the 170 residents who chewed the gum 99 (57.2%) found it reduced oral dryness and 78 (45.1%) reported it made their mouth feel healthy. 34 (53.6%) of the dentate and 47 (40.9%) of the edentate residents wished to keep using the gum (P < 0.05). 35 (74.5%) of the carers found it easy to distribute the gum and 29 (61.7%) thought that chewing gum was an acceptable method of maintaining oral health for residents.

CONCLUSION

The antimicrobial gum investigated in this study was acceptable to many elderly occupants and their carers, significantly improving perceived oral health and oral dryness of residents.

Evaluation of an oral health education program for nursing personnel in special housing facilities for the elderly

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of an oral health education program (OHEP) on attitudes among the responsible nursing personnel toward performing oral health procedures for care receivers. A total of 2882 nursing personnel were offered participation in the OHEP, and the effect was evaluated by means of a questionnaire distributed pre-educationally as well as 1-2 months post-educationally. The nursing personnel were allocated, on the basis of nursing education, to either a "high level of health care education" group (HHCE), including registered and enrolled nurses, or a "low level of health care education" group (LHCE), including nursing assistants and home care aides. Statistical analysis was performed by means of descriptive and analytical statistics. After the OHEP, the nursing personnel estimated their ability to perform oral hygiene procedures for care receivers to be significantly increased. Post-educationally, a significant shift in importance was observed from knowledge regarding the diseased oral cavity to knowledge regarding the healthy oral cavity. It was also observed that, in the LHCE group, the OHEP favored practical procedures, while in the HHCE group, theoretical considerations were favored. This indicates that, when oral health education programs are designed, due attention should be paid to the nursing personnel's education level.

Implications of oral infections on systemic diseases in the institutionalized elderly with a special focus on pneumonia

Systemic infection in the elderly patient living in a chronic care setting presents a significant burden to the health care system. The extent to which oral organisms cause systemic infections through hematogenous dissemination in the institutionalized elderly is still unknown. A more likely and common route of systemic infection by oral microorganisms is through aspiration of oropharyngeal fluids containing oral pathogenic microorganisms, which colonize the lower respiratory tract and cause pneumonia. Respiratory pathogens emerge in the dental plaque of elderly patients with very poor oral hygiene and severe periodontal disease. In the chronic care setting, aspiration of oropharyngeal fluids contaminated with these bacteria occurs in patients with diminished host defenses, resulting in bacterial pneumonia. This is also a problem in intensive care units in the hospital setting. In one study, pre-rinsing with a 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash significantly lowered the mortality rate from postsurgical pneumonia in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Selective digestive decontamination, a technique involving the topical application of antimicrobials to reduce the risk of colonization of the respiratory tract, has been used to reduce the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia in the acute care setting of hospitals. This technique has not been employed in the nursing home setting. Whether improving oral hygiene would also lower the risk in either of these settings has not been studied. A number of obstacles must be overcome in designing studies to investigate the relationship between oral infections and lung infections in the institutionalized elderly. Ethical issues must be addressed, and full collaboration of the medical team is required. Future studies should establish whether reducing the risk for pneumonia in the institutionalized elderly is possible through improved oral health.

Is dental health education effective? A systematic review of current evidence

In order that health service resources are allocated in the way which most benefits the population, systematic review of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of programmes and interventions are required. This study examined papers relating to dental health education interventions, which were published between 1982 and 1994 (n = 143). Each was scored by two independent researchers according to twenty predetermined validity criteria. For each paper which achieved a validity score of more than 12 (n = 37), data concerning the objectives of the intervention, the types and numbers of participants, and the outcomes, were extracted from the article. Where sufficient data were provided in a paper which met more than 15 of the validity criteria quantitative meta-analysis was carried out i.e. the results of the studies were pooled in order to calculate an overall intervention effect with confidence intervals. This combination of qualitative and quantitative review techniques showed that dental health interventions have: a small positive, but temporary effect on plaque accumulation (reduction in plaque index = 0.37 95% CI -0.29-0.59); no discernible effect on caries increment and a consistent positive effect on knowledge levels. The results of this analysis suggest that further efforts to synthesise current information about dental health education, in a systematic way, are required, along with maintenance of rigorous scientific standards in evaluation research.

Research in dental health education and health promotion: a review of the literature

This article presents a review of research in dental health education and health promotion. In the period 1982 to 1992, a total of 57 studies evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to alter individuals' behavior related to dental health were identified. Combining the results of these 57 studies with descriptive articles published over the same period, it appears that dental health education can result in improvements in objective measures of dental health behaviors and actual oral health measures, but has only limited success in changing attitudes towards dental issues and achieves only short-term gains in knowledge. The limited use of theoretical frameworks, poor statistical analyses, the use of convenient samples and the short post-intervention follow-up periods diminish the contribution of this research to the development of dental health policy and the formation of strategies to improve the health of communities.

The effectiveness of oral hygiene programmes for elderly people--a review

Comprehensive oral health care is an essential feature of quality of life. In the near future, a greater number of elderly people will retain more natural teeth, whether or not supplemented by prosthetic provisions, and/or may be provided with implants. As a consequence, oral self-care will be much more demanding. Prevention must reduce the greater risk of oral disease for elderly people. Effective early intervention strategies are: promotion of over-all general health, obviation of stereotypes, education by dental hygienists, instruction and demonstration combined with systematic evaluation, use of a fluoride containing dentifrice, and regular professional support and use of chlorhexidine rinses for less well and confused elderly.

A study to determine oral health needs of institutionalised elderly patients by non dental health care workers

In this survey normative need as assessed by an examining dentist and the subject's own perceived need are compared with need assessed by untrained care workers. A method for simple assessment of elderly people on admission to day centres or elderly peoples' residential homes is described and its efficiency in use assessed during a survey of 41 subjects. Results suggest that use of a simple questionnaire can alert carers to problems requiring dental care--oral hygiene regimens can then be improved, dentures named and dentists called to provide treatment. Too often this type of initial assessment is neglected.

National survey of oral health care in Finnish municipal old people's homes

As oral health is especially important for physically, mentally and socially handicapped old people, the aim of this study was to investigate the dental services provided for people living in municipal old people's homes in Finland. The study involved all the 431 municipal old people's homes in Finland in 1989. The directors of the old people's homes were asked to fill in a questionnaire. The response rate was 99.5%. The study showed that the dental services provided for the elderly vary greatly in different old people's homes. As a whole, however, dental care arrangements are inadequate: oral examinations on admission are performed always in 11% and never in 47% of the old people's homes, and oral examinations for residents are carried out annually in 23% and never in 21%. In 56% of the homes the need for treatment comes to light only when the old people themselves complain about a dental problem. Comprehensive dental care is available in 16% of the homes. One notable feature is that, although all the homes are publicly owned, the system of charging for the dental care of the elderly varies considerably between different homes. Comparing the results of this study with those from earlier investigations shows that, although there has been some progress in dental service arrangements in the 1980s, the oral care provided for these old people is still far from satisfactory. It is obvious that the value of oral health as an important component of human well-being is not yet widely recognized. To rectify the situation uniform regulations governing dental services for the elderly in institutions are required for the whole of the country.

Effects of a 1% chlorhexidine gel on the cariogenic bacteria in high-risk elders: a pilot study

Root caries in dentate elderly patients is a problem which may be controlled with chlorhexidine. The purpose of this pilot study was to establish the extent and duration of the antimicrobial effects from an intensive regimen of a 1% chlorhexidine gel in institutionalized elders who had experienced high caries activity in the previous year. Stimulated saliva samples from all subjects before treatment produced more than 105 colony forming units/milliliters of Streptococcus mutans (mean: 2.0 x 10(7); s.d.: 2.0 x 10(7)) when diluted and cultured on Mitus Salivarius-bacitracin agar for 48 hours. Findings suggest that daily treatments for 1 week with a 1% chlorhexidine gel can reduce the number of cariogenic bacteria in elderly people for approximately 3 weeks after treatment.