Carbamix is redundant in the patch test series

Glove-Related Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Hand dermatitis is a common condition with a lifetime prevalence of 20%. Glove allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a very important dermatitis affecting health care workers, hairdressers, cleaning personnel, kitchen workers, craftsmen, construction workers, laboratory workers, and homemakers. Occupationally related cases may be severe and can result in significant disability. Glove ACD is most commonly due to exposure to rubber accelerators, which are compounds that are added to rubber during production to increase strength and durability. Given the known allergic potential of these compounds, glove manufacturing companies have reformulated gloves leading to the introduction of new rubber allergens. In this review, we will discuss risk factors for glove ACD, both common and uncommon allergens in gloves, common contact allergens that permeate gloves, and patch testing to help uncover the inciting allergen(s).

Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis

Patch testing is the predominant method of establishing contact allergy. The present patch test technique is the result of a continuous process of development and improvement since its first application in the late 19th century. The perfect patch test should give no false-positive and no false-negative reactions. The ideal patch test should also cause as few adverse reactions as possible, particularly no patch test sensitization. Even though the history and examination of a patient with suspected allergic contact dermatitis will give clues to possible sensitizers, it is not sufficient to patch test only with initially suspected sensitizers; unsuspected sensitizers used for patch testing frequently turn out to be the real cause of the dermatitis. Fortunately, a small number of substances are considered to account for the majority of delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Therefore, generally 20-25 test preparations consisting of chemically defined compounds, mixes of allergens, and natural and synthetic compounds, are grouped into a standard test series. The requirements to be fulfilled by a sensitizer in a standard patch test series are discussed in this article. A procedure of investigations is proposed before a sensitizer is included in a standard series.

Contact allergy and exposure patterns to thiurams and carbamates in consecutive patients

Sensitization to rubber is most often due to sensitization to thiurams. Positive patch test reactions to carbamates are less frequent, and usually only diagnosed in patients with positive patch test reactions to thiurams as well. The aim of the present study was to describe the relative frequency of sensitization to thiuram mix (TH mix) and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (ZDC) in a population where the exposure to these chemicals from rubber gloves was previously studied and considered to be of approximately the same order of magnitude. The thiuram derivatives seemed to be the most important sensitized (frequency 2.8%) compared to ZDC (frequency 0.5%), which has been the most frequently reported sensitizer among the carbamates in rubber gloves. An interesting observation was that the probability that the patient was reacting to ZDC was strongly associated with the strength of the patch test reaction to TH mix. This observation may add a new aspect to the discussion about cross-reactivity versus concomitant sensitization of thiurams and carbamates.

Type IV allergy to rubber additives: a 10-year study of 686 cases

BACKGROUND

Rubber additives, mainly vulcanizers and antioxidants, are increasingly a cause of contact dermatitis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of type IV allergy to rubber additives.

METHODS

Seven thousand patients seen during a 10-year period were evaluated. Of them, 4680 were patch tested with the standard series recommended by the Spanish Group for Research of Contact Dermatitis (GEIDC) and a series of individual rubber additives.

RESULTS

A total of 686 patients (14.7% of those patch tested) had one or more positive reactions to rubber additives. Of these, 582 (84.8%) were men and 104 (15.2%) were women. The incidence of rubber sensitization was especially high among construction workers (47.0%).

CONCLUSION

Rubber additives are a common cause of occupational contact dermatitis, particularly in construction workers. We postulate that rubber gloves and boots (utilized to avoid contact with sensitizing substances) themselves may be a common cause of contact dermatitis. The high incidence of allergy to some rubber additives, such as thiurams and carbas, indicates that their replacement by other less sensitizing vulcanizers is advisable.

Release of thiurams and carbamates from rubber gloves

A method for quantitative determination of thiuram and carbamate derivatives released from rubber gloves into synthetic sweat is presented. The analysis was based upon determination of ester derivatives using gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry and isotope-dilution. The detection limit was 0.1 mg thiuram/carbamate in 200 ml synthetic sweat (0.5 ppm). The release of thiurams and carbamates from 5 household and 5 surgical types of gloves into synthetic sweat was determined. Each of the natural rubber gloves released varying amounts of thiurams (0-4.3 mg) as well as carbamates (0-8.1 mg). 22 thiuram-sensitized patients were patch tested with pieces of the gloves. Gloves releasing considerable amounts of thiurams and/or carbamates seemed to cause more positive patch test reactions in these patients than gloves releasing smaller amounts. Surgical gloves made from natural rubber caused a substantial larger number of positive patch test reactions than household gloves made from natural rubber. The amounts released per cm2 of the gloves were of the same order of magnitude as the content per cm2 patch test of thiuram mix, diluted 1:10. The accessibility of a quantitative, chemical analysis for thiurams and carbamates released from rubber gloves makes it reasonable to ask for declarations of rubber gloves. Proposals for threshold values for release of thiurams and carbamates from rubber gloves may be given in the future.

Occupational dermatoses at a film laboratory. Follow-up after modernization

The occurrence and causes of occupational dermatoses at a film laboratory following modernization was studied. In 1983 the film laboratory moved to new premises built to reduce exposure to hazardous chemicals. The study was carried out during 1983-1986 with repeated interviews and dermatological examinations of all employees (78 subjects) and patch testing those with a history of or with current chemical exposure or dermatitis (65 subjects). Of 54 chemically exposed subjects, 34 (63%) had a history of occupational dermatoses, and 12 (22%) were contact allergic to film chemicals. Current, probable occupational dermatoses were observed in 13 subjects--thereof 8 with hand eczema. No new case of occupational skin disease occurred during the investigation period, except for 1 case of ulceration from an acid splash. Petrolatum mixtures of the colour developing agents, Metol and hydroquinone were found most suitable for patch testing, since these chemicals are unstable and/or cause irritation in aqueous solutions. It is concluded that occurrence and severity of occupational dermatoses had been reduced by the technical measures taken to reduce chemical exposure.