Glove-related skin symptoms among operating theatre and dental care unit personnel (II). Clinical examination, tests and laboratory findings indicating latex allergy

Final Report of the Safety Assessment of Cosmetic Ingredients Derived From Zea Mays (Corn)

Many cosmetic ingredients are derived from Zea mays (corn). While safety test data were not available for most ingredients, similarities in preparation and the resulting similar composition allowed extrapolation of safety data to all listed ingredients. Animal studies included acute toxicity, ocular and dermal irritation studies, and dermal sensitization studies. Clinical studies included dermal irritation and sensitization. Case reports were available for the starch as used as a donning agent in medical gloves. Studies of many other endpoints, including reproductive and developmental toxicity, use corn oil as a vehicle control with no reported adverse effects at levels used in cosmetics. While industry should continue limiting ingredient impurities such as pesticide residues before blending into a cosmetic formulation, the CIR Expert Panel determined that corn-derived ingredients are safe for use in cosmetics in the practices of use and concentration described in the assessment.

Occupational skin diseases among dental nurses

Out of 923 female dental nurses in the Helsinki district, 799 were interviewed using a computer-assisted telephone interview. A structured questionnaire was used to inquire about skin, respiratory symptoms, atopy, work history and methods, and exposure at work. The 328 nurses, who reported work-related dermatitis on their hands, forearms or face, were invited to an interview by an occupational physician; 245 nurses participated. 31 nurses had previously been diagnosed with an occupational skin disease (OSD). 133 nurses with a suspected OSD were selected for further clinical examinations with prick and patch testing. Among the 107 nurses examined, 22 new cases of OSD were diagnosed. There were altogether 29 cases of allergic contact dermatitis, 15 of contact urticaria, 12 of irritant contact dermatitis, and 1 case of onychomycosis. Rubber chemicals and natural rubber latex (NRL) in protective gloves, as well as dental-restorative plastic materials [(meth)acrylates], were the most common causes of allergy. 42% of the OSD cases in the studied population had been missing from the statistics (Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases). Plastic gloves or NRL gloves with a low-protein content are recommended for dental work. Skin exposure to (meth)acrylates should be avoided.

Have health conditions associated with latex increased since the issuance of universal precautions?

OBJECTIVES

This study explored whether the prevalence of latex-related health conditions has increased among individuals employed in medical occupations relative to those employed in nonmedical occupations since the issuance of universal precautions in 1987.

METHODS

Data derived from the 1983 to 1994 versions of the National Health Interview Survey were used to obtain odds ratios comparing prevalence rates of latex-related symptoms over time.

RESULTS

No statistical evidence was found that the universal precautions resulted in increased prevalence rates of latex-related health conditions among medical workers relative to those employed in nonmedical occupations.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased use of latex gloves among health care personnel subsequent to the implementation of universal precautions appears to have had no effect on latex allergic reactions experienced by these workers.

Natural rubber latex allergy in a health-care population in Wales

BACKGROUND

Type 1 natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy prevalence rates quoted vary due to the different populations studied and methodologies used for assessment and investigation of NRL allergy.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the rate of type 1 allergy to NRL in health-care workers (HCWs) in a single NHS trust in Wales.

METHODS

A response rate of 3716 of 5548 (67%) of the employees was obtained with a latex allergy questionnaire administered by the occupational health departments. Type 1 NRL allergy was diagnosed by correlating clinical symptoms, skin prick testing and IgE RAST to latex in the dermatology department.

RESULTS

The period prevalence (1998-2001) for type 1 clinical latex allergy in HCWs was 25 of 4439 (0.56%). Of the 25 positive HCWs, 18 (72%) were nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

The low prevalence rate of type 1 NRL allergy should not lead to underestimating the importance of clinically significant NRL allergy and the risks that need to be minimized.

Skin protection programmes

Educational programmes, including evidence-based recommendations on skin protection (skin protection programmes), have been proposed for the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis in occupations with a high frequency of this disease. Recent intervention studies directed at wet-work employees showed a positive influence on wet-work behaviour and on clinical skin symptoms. The structure and implementation of skin protection programmes are discussed.

Prevalence of skin test reactions to natural rubber latex in hospital personnel in Russia and eastern Europe

BACKGROUND

Allergic reactions to natural rubber latex have increased during the past 10 years, especially in many health care workers (HCWs) who have high exposure to latex allergens. The prevalence of skin test reactions to natural rubber latex in Russia, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), and eastern Europe is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of skin test reactivity to natural rubber latex in a population of HCWs exposed to latex.

METHODS

Nine hundred one HCWs regularly exposed to latex were evaluated using an allergy history questionnaire. Subjects were tested for latex allergy by titrated skin prick test with a biologically standardized latex extract. The diagnosis of latex allergy was defined by the presence of clinical symptoms when exposed to latex along with a positive skin prick test to latex.

RESULTS

Forty-nine (5.4%) HCWs were skin test-positive to latex. Seventeen (1.9%) HCWs were classified as latex-allergic based upon positive skin tests to latex associated with allergy symptoms with exposure. Seven of 901 HCWs had experienced anaphylactic reactions to latex. The most frequently reported symptom related to latex exposure was contact urticaria.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of latex allergy among HCWs in Russia, the CIS, and adjacent eastern European countries is considerably less than reported in HCWs exposed to latex in western Europe and the United States. The low prevalence of latex allergy in Russia and the CIS suggests that lessened exposure to natural latex powdered gloves may diminish the prevalence of latex sensitization in HCWs in Russia and the CIS.

Epidemiology of latex sensitization and allergies in health care workers

Although it is often claimed that health care workers are at increased risk of latex sensitization and type I allergies, there has been no systematic analysis of the epidemiologic studies that are relevant to this conclusion. A systematic analysis of the epidemiologic literature found that, in the past 14 years, there have been 48 epidemiologic studies of type I latex allergy among health care workers. Of these, 2 cohort studies estimated the incidence of latex sensitization by skin prick testing at between 1% and 2.5% per year. Neither compared the risk to that in the general population. The prevalence of sensitization in health care workers varied between 0% and 30%, yet this large variation was unexplained. Increased risk of sensitization was not clearly associated with the duration of work in health care, the time spent wearing latex gloves, the frequency of exposure, the specific job categories, the use of powdered versus nonpowdered latex gloves, the use of latex versus nonlatex gloves, or any measurements of ambient exposure to latex proteins. The epidemiologic studies do not support a conclusion that health care workers are at clearly increased risk of latex sensitization or type I allergies compared to other occupations in the United States. The role of latex gloves in causing latex sensitization and type I allergic symptoms remains poorly defined because of the inconsistent results across studies. Future epidemiologic studies are needed that include measured exposures to latex antigens, that compare health care workers to appropriate referent groups, and that address confounding by atopy, age, sex, and race.

Inhaled latex allergen (Hev b 1)

BACKGROUND

IgE-mediated responses to natural rubber latex allergens have become a major health problem among recognized risk groups.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this investigation was to measure the amounts of Hevea brasiliensis latex allergen (Hev b 1) inhaled and deposited on surfaces when latex or vinyl gloves were worn and compare the results with the conventional measures (breathing zone samplers) of occupational exposure.

METHODS

Hev b 1 exposure was measured by nasal sampling and breathing zone sampling. Latex allergen exposure was generated by having each subject don a pair of powdered latex examination gloves and continuing his or her normal daily activity for 30 minutes. By means of adhesive tape, surface dust samples were collected from the surfaces of gloves, the subject's hands, and work areas. Sampling was performed with subjects wearing no gloves, subjects wearing powdered vinyl gloves, subjects wearing powdered latex gloves, and nearby colleagues wearing latex gloves. All samples were assayed through use of the HALOgen assay (Inhalix, Sydney, Australia) with a Hev b 1-specific mAb. Particles transporting latex allergen were identified by a surrounding immunostain halo, and these were quantified and reported as total numbers of particles inhaled, airborne, or found on surface areas evaluated.

RESULTS

Study subjects inhaled 26 times more allergen when powdered latex gloves were worn than under the "no glove" and powdered vinyl glove conditions. During the same period, Hev b 1 particle levels measured in the ambient air through use of the breathing zone sampler increased by 24-fold. The median numbers of particles carrying Hev b 1 allergen per square centimeter on the surface of the hands after the wearing of latex and vinyl gloves were 1964 and 5, respectively. Latex allergen was physically associated both with cornstarch granules and with larger dust particles having a darker, more irregular appearance.

CONCLUSION

In a laboratory where gloves are worn for protection, the use of latex gloves resulted in a 26-fold increase in inhaled latex allergen over background levels measured while vinyl gloves were worn as controls. Low levels of latex exposure also occurred when vinyl gloves or no gloves were worn; the reasons for this are under investigation.

Natural rubber latex allergy workers' compensation claims: Washington State healthcare workers, 1991-1999

Occupational reaction to natural rubber latex experienced by healthcare employees was examined using data of all workers' compensation claims filed by state-insured healthcare employees in Washington State for the period 1991-1999 (n = 65,703). As latex reaction is not a condition for which there are specific identification codes, these claims were estimated by coupling source and nature of injury records that were consistent with reactions to latex. It was found that the claim rate was on average 2.66 per 10,000 state-insured healthcare workers annually. The most common condition experienced was dermal (84.3%), and most common body part affected was the hand (70.0%). Because few claims cited respiratory or conjunctivitis as reaction experienced, little evidence was discovered to support that glove powder acted as a widespread latex allergen transmitter in healthcare environments. Most cases did not require indemnity payment for lost work time (81.2%), suggesting most reactions were minor. The average cost per natural rubber latex claim was $2,759.10, compared to $3,178.18 for the average healthcare worker claim for all causes. Overall, the average cost per state-insured healthcare worker employed during this time was under $0.74 per year. Nursing aides/orderlies were the most frequent healthcare occupation filing a claim (33.2%). The majority of claimants were female (87.9%), and unmarried workers (52.0%) filed slightly more claims than married workers (48.0%). In comparison with other workers' compensation claims filed by healthcare workers during this period, 0.34 percent of the total was potentially related to natural rubber latex, with other common healthcare workplace items cited more frequently as source of occupational injury.

Frequency of natural rubber latex allergy in adults is increased after multiple operative procedures

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that immediate-type allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) affects predominantly health-care workers and infants with malformations requiring repeated medical procedures. Adult patients with multiple invasive procedures are not thought to be at an increased risk of NRL allergy.

METHODS

A total of 325 consecutive adult inpatients (54.4+/-15.6 years; 219 men, 106 women) awaiting surgical or urologic procedures were assessed by questionnaire-based history (atopic diseases, number of previous standard operative or endoscopic procedures, intolerance to rubber products, and adverse reactions during medical care), by skin prick tests with different NRL test solutions, by measurement of NRL-specific IgE in the serum, and, if sensitization to NRL was found, by cutaneous challenge tests with NRL-containing material. Subjects were classified as sensitized to NRL if skin prick test reactions to NRL were positive or if NRL-specific IgE antibodies were found. NRL allergy was defined as NRL sensitization and immediate-type symptoms to NRL.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of 325 (9.5%) subjects were found to be sensitized to NRL, 14/285 (4.9%) by skin prick testing and 23/323 (7.1%) by NRL-specific IgE antibodies in the serum. Four individuals (1.2%) were diagnosed as having clinically manifest NRL allergy, and another 27 (8.3%) were sensitized to NRL without symptoms to date. The frequency of previous invasive procedures was zero in eight patients, up to 10 in 245, 11-20 in 52, 21-30 in seven, and over 30 (up to 83) in 13 patients. No association was found between the number of invasive procedures and NRL sensitization without clinical symptoms. However, 3/4 patients with NRL allergy had undergone more than 30 interventions, and 1/4 had had 11 operations. Frequent invasive procedures (more than 10) were significantly associated with NRL allergy (P<0.001). Allergy or sensitization to NRL was associated with atopy (21/31 vs 87/294) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A remarkable percentage of unselected adult patients undergoing surgical procedures have allergy or sensitization to NRL. Repeated invasive treatment appears to be a risk factor for NRL allergy.

Latex hypersensitivity in spinal cord injured adult patients

Latex hypersensitivity is a major cause of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Patients with spina bifida, health care or rubber industry workers have been considered at risk for latex sensitization. By analogy, the existence of other at-risk subsets of patients with latex exposure due to frequent surgical procedures has been suggested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitization in a cohort of adult patients with spinal cord injury and repeated latex exposure. Forty-two adult patients with spinal cord injury were studied and retrospectively compared to a group of 30 children with spina bifida evaluated using a similar protocol. Patients were administered a questionnaire concerning history of latex hypersensitivity, atopy, and surgical procedures. Latex sensitivity was investigated by skin prick-tests and latex-specific IgE assay. The search for atopy was based on in vivo and in vitro tests against a panel of environmental allergens. No chronic spinal cord injured patient had a history of latex allergy. When compared with spina bifida, the number of surgical procedures was not statistically different. Although not significantly different, the prevalence of atopy was higher in spina bifida patients. The high level of latex sensitization in spina bifida patients contrasted sharply with the absence of sensitization observed on both skin and in vitro tests in patients with spinal cord injury (P<0.0001). This study confirms that adult patients with chronic neurologic defects resulting from spinal cord injury exhibit a low risk of latex sensitization. These results suggest that considering adult patients with repeated surgical procedures as a group at risk for latex sensitization because of a high degree of latex exposure should be re-examined.

Protective gloves in Swedish dentistry: use and side-effects

BACKGROUND

During the 1980s routine wearing of gloves in dentistry was recommended by health authorities in several countries. However, prolonged glove use is associated with side-effects of irritant and allergic origin.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the extent of glove use and self-reported glove intolerance reactions among Swedish dentists, and to examine how far IgE-mediated allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) occurs in subjects who report rapid itching when in contact with protective gloves.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A postal questionnaire was answered by 3083 of 3500 licensed dentists, a response rate of 88%. Of the dentists who reported rapidly occurring itching of the hands from gloves, 131 of 170 attended a clinical examination including a skin prick test (SPT) and a serological examination (RAST) for IgE-mediated allergy.

RESULTS

Seventy-three per cent of the dentists reported daily glove use of more than 2 h, 48% more than 6 h a day, and 6% reported no use. NRL gloves were used most frequently (P < 0.001) and were the main material that elicited symptoms (P < 0.001). Female dentists reported more frequent glove use than males, as did young dentists (P < 0.001) compared with older ones. Females also preferred vinyl gloves. Glove intolerance reactions were reported by 723 (23%) dentists, [females 28%, males 21% (P < 0.001)] and were more common in younger dentists. Of the 417 dentists with reported hand eczema during the previous year, 54% reported glove intolerance, compared with 20% of the dentists without hand eczema (P < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis including hand eczema, age, sex and atopy showed that all these factors contributed significantly to the risk of glove intolerance, and that hand eczema was a stronger factor than atopy. In 15 of 131 (11%) dentists examined for reported glove-related itch, latex allergy was verified by SPT and/or RAST. Glove-related conjunctivitis, rhinitis and asthma, in contrast to skin symptoms, showed a significant association with IgE-mediated allergy to NRL.

CONCLUSIONS

Swedish dentists show good compliance with the recommendations for routine glove use. Intolerance reactions are frequently reported, especially by dentists with hand eczema, which emphasizes the need for preventive skin care programmes. Glove-related symptoms from mucous membranes showed a higher association with IgE-mediated allergy to NRL than reported itching of the skin, a fact that should be considered when composing screening questionnaires for NRL sensitization

Sensitisation to natural rubber latex: an epidemiological study of workers exposed during tapping and glove manufacture in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the prevalence of sensitisation to natural rubber latex in latex tappers and latex glove factory workers, and to relate this to airborne exposure to latex.

METHODS

Five hundred workers employed in three latex glove factories, 314 tappers, and 144 college students (control group) were studied. The workers in the glove factories were classified into three exposure groups; high, moderate, and low. Personal exposures to natural rubber latex aeroallergens were measured by immunoassay. Symptom questionnaires and skin prick tests with latex allergens (Stallergènes 1:200 w/v) and other common environmental allergens were performed. The criterion for positivity was a wheal reaction at least 3 mm in diameter greater than that to a diluent control.

RESULTS

The geometric mean (GM) concentration of latex in air was 15.4 microg/m(3) for those employed in glove stripping, glove inspections, and packing of powdered gloves. The moderate exposure glove manufacturing group and the tappers had GM concentrations of 2.3 and 2.4 microg/m(3) respectively, compared with United Kingdom users of latex powdered gloves,who had GM concentrations of 0.5 microg/m(3). The prevalence of sensitisation to latex in the tappers and latex glove factory workers was 1.3% and 1.7% respectively. No positive cases were found among the college students. Workers who showed a positive skin prick test to latex were more likely to be atopic. Work related respiratory and dermatological symptoms were found in about 20% of each population studied, but were not related to the presence of positive latex prick tests.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that in the Thai latex industries, latex sensitisation is rare despite high concentrations of airborne exposure and is less prevalent than in the healthcare sector in Europe where skin exposure is greater.

Workers' compensation claims from latex glove use: a longitudinal analysis of Minnesota data from 1988 to 1997

Allergic reaction experienced by health care workers from latex glove use has increasingly become the focus of researchers evaluating occupational sources of injury in health care settings. Many studies have attempted to estimate the prevalence of latex sensitization among health care workers by using various methods, but the findings have been inconsistent and do not predict reactivity. This study used workers' compensation data from Minnesota from 1988 to 1997 to assess allergic reactivity rates, injury severity, and costs associated with latex allergic reactions. The average reactivity rate was 7.1 claims per 100,000 health care workers, and total cost associated with the claims averaged $0.295 per health care employee. Using empirical cost data from another study, it was found that it is not cost-beneficial for health care institutions to globally adopt latex glove-free policies solely on the basis of workers' compensation costs.

Avoiding problems: evidence-based selection of medical gloves

Allergenic contact reaction to glove proteins and residual chemicals increased from 1980 onwards; circumstantial and technical evidence indicates that change from reusable to disposable latex gloves was a causative factor. Several protein fractions are potentially allergenic; if low protein gloves contain a dominant protein fraction, people with sensitivity may still have an adverse reaction. Use of chlorinated powder-free gloves reduces risk of allergenic reaction; other powder-free gloves may still pose a contact risk to patients. Adverse comparative tests of vinyl vs latex medical gloves may, in some cases, have used non-medical gloves without assessment of initial quality or involved an unrealistic test method; these have discouraged use of a non-allergenic alternative to latex gloves. Vinyl medical glove properties are reviewed. Nitrile examination gloves offer better protection than latex types when handling lipid-soluble substances and chemicals. Properties of medical gloves made from other materials are described.

Latex allergy in Polish nurses

BACKGROUND

Reports on the studies conducted in Western Europe and North America revealed that from 2.8 to 16.9% of the health care personnel were allergic to latex. No respective data are available from Eastern European countries.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire inquiring about the history of latex-induced allergic reactions was distributed among 3,750 nurses. The participation rate was 77.3%. To verify the results of the survey, in randomly selected nurses, skin prick tests with latex and tropical fruit allergens, evaluation of total IgE, and specific anti-latex IgE, skin and nasal provocation with latex were performed.

RESULTS

Allergic symptoms in the workplace were reported by 1,016 subjects (35%); out of this group 847 (29.2%) persons associated the symptoms with latex exposure. The group of cases with self-reported latex allergy revealed a significantly increased frequency of history of atopy, allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics and tropical fruits. Allergy to latex was confirmed in 33.3% of randomly selected nurses with a positive history of occupational allergy. It was found that 18.6% of nurses working at hospital wards were allergic to latex. The 95% CI was estimated to be 13.5-23.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Latex allergy is an important health problem among nurses in Poland. Atopy, allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics and tropical fruits, are the risk factors for latex allergy.

The dental team and latex hypersensitivity. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs

BACKGROUND

In the late 1980s, there were notable increases in reports of allergic reactions to natural rubber latex, or NRL, particularly in association with barium enema procedures and medical procedures performed on children with spina bifida. These reports also raised awareness of the growing concern about NRL allergy in both patients and health care workers.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISORDER

This report by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs summarizes the signs and symptoms of NRL protein allergy, allergic contact dermatitis and irritant dermatitis; offers information on means to diagnose these conditions definitively; and suggests means of reducing occupational exposure to the causative allergens and irritants in the dental office.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Reducing health care workers' occupational exposure may assist in minimizing adverse reactions associated with frequent wearing of gloves. The Council on Scientific Affairs will address issues relating to latex hypersensitivity among patients in a future report.

Latex allergy

Coined the next major health concern of the decade, allergy to natural rubber latex affects people routinely exposed to rubber products. Groups at highest risk include health care workers, rubber industry workers, and persons who have undergone multiple surgical procedures, especially those with spina bifida. Allergy to latex is a type I, immediate, IgE-mediated reaction, which can lead to anaphylaxis and death. Much of latex research is published in allergy journals. Dermatologists may not be aware of the prevalence, symptoms, risks, diagnosis, and treatment of latex allergy. These topics are the subject of this review. Research concerning antigenic proteins, as well as sources of latex alternatives, is also summarized. (J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;39:1-24.)

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

At the completion of this learning activity, participants should have a clear understanding of the history, biology, epidemiology, mechanism, clinical characteristics, diagnostic work-up, and treatment of latex allergy. Readers should also have a greater understanding of multiple potential allergenic latex proteins and their importance in preventing future latex-sensitization.

Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy (type I and type IV) in laboratory workers in The Netherlands

The objective of the study was to study the prevalence of Type IV and Type I allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) in a population at risk in the Netherlands. Laboratory workers regularly using gloves were invited to complete a questionnaire and to be tested. We performed patch tests with standard contact allergens, rubber additives, glove powder and pieces of 4 gloves; prick tests with inhalant allergens, glove extracts, glove powder and fruit extracts; and RASTs. Glove-related hand dermatitis was reported in 36.9% of the individuals interviewed. A positive patch test result for rubber additives was seen in only 6.6%. Glove-related urticaria, rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma were reported in 24.6% of all cases. Confirmation of an IgE-mediated reaction was achieved in 8.3% by prick test with glove extracts and 5.0% by RAST. No reaction to glove powder was noticed in patch testing or in prick testing. A high prevalence rate of glove-related symptoms and NRL Type I allergy was found in laboratory workers exposed to rubber gloves. Surprisingly, there was no co-existence of Type I and Type IV allergy in this population.

Atopy and other risk factors for UK dentists reporting an adverse reaction to latex gloves

A study was conducted to assess the significance of a personal history of atopy and other risk factors for UK dentists reporting an adverse reaction to natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves. 2535 dentists completed a self-administered questionnaire and, of these, 1034 (group 1) reported an adverse reaction to NRL gloves and 1501 (group 2) did not. Risk factors investigated were: sex, years in clinical practice, exposure to gloves and a history of atopy or food allergy. The signs and symptoms reported by group 1 dentists were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify a set of risk factors that produced the most discrete model for a dentist reporting an adverse reaction to NRL gloves. A personal history of atopy was a significant risk factor. Dentists with a history of eczema and hand eczema in childhood were most likely to report an adverse reaction to NRL gloves.

Prevalence of occupationally related hand dermatitis in dental workers

Occupationally related hand dermatitis has been attributed to frequent hand-washing, exposure to possible sensitizers and latex glove use. The authors conducted a study to determine the prevalence of occupationally related hand dermatitis in dental personnel. They found that 75 (19.2 percent) of 390 subjects self-reported they had a positive history of hand dermatitis. Further testing of 53 of these subjects indicated that only 9.4 percent reacted to the 45 allergens tested, and 3.8 percent had an allergy to latex.

Natural rubber latex hypersensitivity: incidence and prevalence of type I allergy in the dental professional

The authors investigated the prevalence of immediate (Type I) hypersensitivity to gloves made from natural rubber latex, or NRL, by performing skin-prick tests on 2,166 dental workers over the course of a two-year period (with two one-year intervals). The investigator used two separate eluents made from different brands of natural rubber latex gloves. The study, conducted in 1994 and 1995 as part of the American Dental Association's Annual Health Screening Program, found that 6.2 percent of the participants (dentists, hygienists and assistants) tested positive for Type I hypersensitivity to NRL proteins.

Allergic and Irritant Glove-related Diseases in Health Care Workers and Their Prevention

Because the widespread use of gloves by health care workers has induced an increase of both irritant and type I or type IV allergic glove-related diseases, the Italian Society of Preventive Medicine for Health Care Workers set up a working group to collect information about glove composition and to standardize procedures for the diagnosis and prevention of glove-related disease and job-fitness evaluation of employees who will be wearing gloves. In addition, the group made recommendations for educational programs focusing not only on users but also on purchasers, who presently favor glove selection for economic reasons. The group's recommendations are summarized in a consensus document, but cannot be considered definitive. More research is needed to achieve answers to questions raised by the working group, indicated in the consensus document. In particular, diagnostic criteria must be standardized to plan multicenter studies to verify the real extent of the problem, and further studies are needed to verify whether limit values for substances contained in the gloves (e.g., latex proteins, residual chemicals) can be established.

IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to latex in childhood

A total of 267 children scheduled to receive anesthesia during a surgical, neurosurgical, or orthopedic intervention were investigated. IgE antibodies against latex were detected in serum samples of 6.4% (17/267 children) of the patients. The most important difference between sensitized and nonsensitized children was the number of surgical interventions in the past. The median of surgical interventions was 1.0 in the nonsensitized group of children and 3.0 in the sensitized group. Only 0.9% of the children with up to two surgical interventions and 34.1% with three or more procedures were sensitized to latex. Only one of the sensitized children developed intraoperative anaphylaxis during intervention after our investigation. We conclude that children with a history of three or more surgical interventions have a high risk of sensitization to latex proteins. Nevertheless, the predictive value of IgE antibodies against latex for development of anaphylaxis during anesthesia seems to be low.

Perioperative collapse: prevalence of latex allergy in patients sensitive to anaesthetic agents

The evidence in the literature suggests that the prevalence of latex allergy in the general population is approximately 1%. With increasing awareness of transmission of HIV and other infections such as hepatitis B, the use of latex gloves and condoms has escalated in recent years. As cheaper latex gloves of variable and doubtful quality flood the market, health care workers and patients are being increasingly sensitized by these latex products. A retrospective study investigated the prevalence of latex allergy in a cohort of 26 patients who suffered perioperative anaphylactoid reactions. 84% of these patients were hypersensitive to at least 1 anaesthetic-related agent. 7.7% were also allergic to latex (p = 0.028). Atopy is a strong predisposing factor (p = 0.006). An accurate preoperative history of atopy and past reactions to latex will identify most at-risk patients. Prick test and RAST to latex will confirm the latex allergy. Anaesthetists, surgeons, allergists and other health practitioners should be aware of this problem.