Bufexamac and diclofenac: frequency of contact sensitization and absence of cross-reactions

Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers

Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration-time course. Twenty-four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady-state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, C_max was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC₅₀ values for COX-1 and COX-2, explaining the absence of dose-dependent toxicities.

Oxazolone and diclofenac-induced popliteal lymph node assay reactions are attenuated in mice orally pretreated with the respective compound: potential role for the induction of regulatory mechanisms following enteric administration

The murine popliteal lymph node assay (PLNA) was examined as a preclinical assay with the potential to identify low-molecular-weight compounds (LMWCs) that are likely to be associated with immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions (IDHRs) in humans. We hypothesized that the contact sensitizer oxazolone (OX) would cause a strong PLN reaction in naive mice and that the PLN reaction would be attenuated in mice orally pretreated with OX due to the induction of oral tolerance. In naive mice, OX induced a strong PLN reaction and caused dose-dependent increases in PLN size, weight, cellularity, percentage of CD4(+) PLN T cells, and percentage of PLN B cells, with a concomitant decrease in the percentage of CD8(+) PLN T cells. Next, the PLNA was conducted in mice gavaged three times with either OX or vehicle alone (olive oil). Mice pretreated with OX had suppressed PLN reactions following the footpad injection of OX (decrease in PLN size, weight, and cellularity), which was associated with an increase in the percentage of PLN CD8(+)T cells. In contrast, oral pretreatment with OX had no observable effect on the PLN reaction induced following footpad injection of the irrelevant hapten dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). Adoptive transfer studies were conducted to examine the mechanism of PLN hyporesponsiveness. It was found that either (1) unfractionated splenocytes or (2) purified CD8(+) splenocytes, but not (3) purified CD4(+) splenocytes isolated from mice gavaged with OX adoptively transferred PLN suppression to naive BALB/c mice. Because OX is not a pharmaceutical, we also examined the NSAID diclofenac (DF) (Voltaren). Like OX, DF caused dose-dependent increases in PLN size, weight, and cellularity in naive mice. Furthermore, like OX, the diclofenac-induced PLN reaction was attenuated in mice that had been orally pretreated three times with DF. However, splenocytes from mice orally treated with DF were not able to adoptively transfer PLN hyporesponsiveness. Collectively, these observations demonstrate that both OX and DF are potent immunostimulators in the PLNA. As importantly, these results demonstrate that the immunostimulating potential of OX and DF in the PLNA is significantly decreased in mice orally exposed to the respective drug, possibly due to the presence of a cellular mechanism of oral tolerance. For OX, the mechanism appears to involve, in part, CD8(+) T cells, whereas the mechanism(s) associated with PLN hyporesponsiveness using DF remain to be defined.