1
|
Thomas P, Arenberger P, Bader R, Bircher AJ, Bruze M, de Graaf N, Hartmann D, Johansen JD, Jowitz-Heinke A, Krenn V, Kurek M, Odgaard A, Rustemeyer T, Summer B, Thyssen JP. A literature review and expert consensus statement on diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38:1471-1477. [PMID: 38606660 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although rare, allergic reactions to metal implants represent a diagnostic challenge in view of missing guidelines. OBJECTIVES To develop an European expert consensus on characteristics of metal allergy reactions and the utility of various diagnostic tools in suspected metal implant allergy. METHODS A nominal group technique (NGT) was applied to develop consensus statements. Initially an online literature database was created on a secure server to enable a comprehensive information. Twenty-three statements were formulated on potential aspects of metal implant allergy with a focus on diagnostics and grouped into five domains. For the consensus development, the panel of 12 experts initially did refine and reformulate those statements that were ambiguous or had unclear wording. By face-to-face (9/12) or virtual participation (3/12), an anonymous online voting was performed. RESULTS Consensus (≥80% of agreement) was reached in 20/23 statements. The panel agreed that implant allergy despite being rare should be considered in case of persistent unexplained symptoms. It was, however, recommended to allow adequate time for resolution of symptoms associated with healing and integration of an implant. Obtaining questionnaire-aided standardized medical history and standardized scoring of patient outcomes was also considered an important step by all experts There was broad consensus regarding the utility/performance of patch testing with additional late reading. It was recognized that the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has to many limitations to be generally recommended. Prior to orthopaedic implant, allergy screening of patients without a history of potential allergy to implant components was not recommended. CONCLUSIONS Using an expert consensus process, statements concerning allergy diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy were created. Areas of nonconsensus were identified, stressing uncertainty among the experts around topics such as preoperative testing in assumed allergy, histological correlate of periimplant allergy and in vitro testing, which underscores the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Thomas
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - P Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital of Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - R Bader
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - A J Bircher
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - N de Graaf
- Department of Dermatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Hartmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
- München Klinik gGmbH, Munich, Germany
| | - J D Johansen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, National Allergy Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - A Jowitz-Heinke
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - V Krenn
- MVZHZMD Trier GmbH, Trier, Germany
| | - M Kurek
- Hospital MEDICAM, Gryfice, Poland
| | - A Odgaard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B Summer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - J P Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University of Copenhagen, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sadrolvaezin A, Pezhman A, Zare I, Nasab SZ, Chamani S, Naghizadeh A, Mostafavi E. Systemic allergic contact dermatitis to palladium, platinum, and titanium: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, prevalence, and therapeutic approaches. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e386. [PMID: 37873514 PMCID: PMC10590457 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Contact dermatitis (CD) is an inflammatory skin disease of eczema that is elicited by chemicals or metal ions that have toxic effects without eliciting a T-cell response (contact elicitation) or by small reactive chemicals that modify proteins and induce innate and adaptive immune responses (contact allergens). The clinical condition is characterized by localized skin rash, pruritus, redness, swelling, and lesions, which are mainly detected by patch tests and lymphocyte stimulation. Heavy metals such as palladium (Pd), platinum (Pt), and titanium (Ti) are ubiquitous in our environment. These heavy metals have shown CD effects as allergic agents. Immunological responses result from the interaction of cytokines and T cells. Occupational metal CD accounts for most cases of work-related cutaneous disorders. In this systematic review, the allergic effects of heavy metals, including Pd, Pt, and Ti, and the mechanisms, clinical manifestations, prevalence, and therapeutic approaches are discussed in detail. Furthermore, the therapeutic approaches introduced to treat CD, including corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, systemic immunosuppressive agents, phototherapy, and antihistamines, can be effective in the treatment of these diseases in the future. Ultimately, the insights identified could lead to improved therapeutic and diagnostic pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Sadrolvaezin
- Medical Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research CenterBirjand University of Medical SciencesBirjandIran
| | - Arezou Pezhman
- School of MedicineZahedan Azad University of Medical SciencesZahedanIran
| | - Iman Zare
- Research and Development DepartmentSina Medical Biochemistry Technologies Co. Ltd.ShirazIran
| | - Shima Zahed Nasab
- Department of Life Science EngineeringFaculty of New Sciences and TechnologiesUniversity of TehranTehranIran
| | - Sajad Chamani
- Medical Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research CenterBirjand University of Medical SciencesBirjandIran
| | - Ali Naghizadeh
- Medical Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research CenterBirjand University of Medical SciencesBirjandIran
| | - Ebrahim Mostafavi
- Stanford Cardiovascular InstituteStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
- Department of MedicineStanford University School of MedicineStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fan D, Ma J, Liu X, Zhang S, Sun J, Li Y, Jiang B, Zhang L. The safety and efficiency of benzoyl peroxide for reducing Cutibacterium acnes in the shoulder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2023; 10:1015490. [PMID: 36969754 PMCID: PMC10036352 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1015490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundCutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), a common pathogen, contributes significantly to infections in shoulder surgery. Prevention of shoulder infection is crucial to improve postoperative functional recovery and reduce costs. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of 5% benzoyl peroxide (BPO) application in the shoulder to decrease C. acnes.MethodsThree electronic databases were searched as follows: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. Data extraction for this study was performed by two independent reviewers, and only level I and level II studies were included. The outcome data sources of individual studies were pooled. The fixed-effect model was used to determine the meta-analysis.ResultsThere were five level I studies and five level II studies. The results showed that the 5% BPO group had a lower risk of C. acnes positivity [OR, 0.21 (0.15, 0.30), I2 = 24, p < 0.00001]. The pooled analysis results showed that there was no significant difference in the ability of 5% BPO and 5% BPO + clindamycin to reduce C. acnes. However, the lower rate of adverse events was significantly in favour of the non-BPO group compared with the 5% BPO group.ConclusionBPO can decrease C. acnes in the shoulder to prevent infection. However, the combination of BPO and clindamycin does not enhance this effect further.Level of evidenceII, Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DingYuan Fan
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jia Ma
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - XiaoHua Liu
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Sheng Zhang
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Sun
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Jiang
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Lei Zhang
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pautasso A, Zorzolo I, Bellato E, Pellegrino P, Ferrario A, Pira E, Castoldi F. Allergic reaction and metal hypersensitivity after shoulder joint replacement. Musculoskelet Surg 2023; 107:55-68. [PMID: 34719773 PMCID: PMC10020248 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-021-00729-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metal ion release may cause local and systemic effects and induce hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of our study is first to determine if implant-related hypersensitivity correlates to patient symptoms or not; second, to assess the rate of hypersensitivity and allergies in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Forty patients with shoulder replacements performed between 2015 and 2017 were studied with minimum 2-year follow-up; no patient had prior metal implants. Each patient underwent radiographic and clinical evaluation using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), 22 metal and cement haptens patch testing, serum and urine tests to evaluate 12 metals concentration, and a personal occupational medicine interview. RESULTS At follow-up (average 45 ± 10.7 months), the mean CMS was 76 ± 15.9; no clinical complications or radiographic signs of loosening were detected; two nickel sulfate (5%), 1 benzoyl peroxide (2.5%) and 1 potassium dichromate (2.5%) positive findings were found, but all these patients were asymptomatic. There was an increase in serum aluminum, urinary aluminum and urinary chromium levels of 1.74, 3.40 and 1.83 times the baseline, respectively. No significant difference in metal ion concentrations were found when patients were stratified according to gender, date of surgery, type of surgery, and type of implant. CONCLUSIONS Shoulder arthroplasty is a source of metal ion release and might act as a sensitizing exposure. However, patch test positivity does not seem to correlate to hypersensitivity cutaneous manifestations or poor clinical results. Laboratory data showed small constant ion release over time, regardless of gender, type of shoulder replacement and implant used. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE Level II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Pautasso
- University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - I. Zorzolo
- University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - E. Bellato
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - P. Pellegrino
- Oncologic Orthopaedic Department, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center – Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - A. Ferrario
- Occupational Medicine Division, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center – Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - E. Pira
- University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
- Occupational Medicine Division, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, Orthopaedic and Trauma Center – Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - F. Castoldi
- University of Turin, Via Gianfranco Zuretti 29, 10126 Turin, Italy
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Regione Gonzole 10, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Physical–chemical characterization of PMMA-based hip implant centralizer and spacer: evaluation of monomers and impurities screening. Polym Bull (Berl) 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s00289-022-04515-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
6
|
Battaglia AG, Ali-Zade C, Monti L, Al Khawashki H, Winkler H, Del Sel H, Mavrogenis AF, Benzakour T, Drago L, Romanò CL. Metal Hypersensitivity or Missed Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Critical Review. Orthopedics 2022; 45:e73-e78. [PMID: 34978510 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20211227-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The World Association Against Infection in Orthopedics And Trauma (W.A.I.O.T.) Study Group on Bone And Joint Infection Definitions Metal hypersensitivity (MHS) has been investigated by several authors as a possible reason for painful total joint arthroplasty, with controversial results. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is another possible source of unexplained pain and implant failure that may be difficult to diagnose if not properly investigated. We performed this critical review to assess whether the current literature on MHS includes an adequate diagnostic workup to discern metal allergy from PJI. The results of this review highlight the importance of assessing patients for PJI before making a diagnosis of MHS and emphasize that the methods currently used to exclude PJI are substantially inadequate. Therefore, well-designed clinical trials with adequate diagnostic protocols and definitions of PJI that can differentiate MHS from low-grade PJI are needed. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):e73-e78.].
Collapse
|
7
|
Park E, Jung J, Son M, Jeong S, Kim K, Kim K. Relationship between dermatitis and joint replacement: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Indian J Dermatol 2022; 67:312. [DOI: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_1012_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
8
|
Pahlavan S, Hegde V, Bracey DN, Jennings JM, Dennis DA. Bone Cement Hypersensitivity in Patients With a Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series of Revision Using Custom Cementless Implants. Arthroplast Today 2021; 11:20-24. [PMID: 34409143 PMCID: PMC8361018 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about patients with bone cement hypersenstivity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We present 7 patients implanted with 8 TKAs with clinical failure and a cement hypersensitivity diagnosis. All demonstrated hypersensitivity to bone cement via skin patch and/or lymphocyte transformation testing. All 7 patients also showed hypersensitivity to metal, most commonly nickel. Patients underwent custom cementless TKA revision. Prerevision and postrevision outcome measures, radiographs, intraoperative findings, and postrevision complications are reported. Functional scores improved after revision except Veterans RAND-12 mental component scores, which declined. Four patients continue to exhibit symptoms postoperatively, while one patient has had 3 additional surgical procedures. Patients presenting with bone cement hypersensitivity after TKA are particularly challenging. Evidence-based guidelines are lacking, and revision surgery may not relieve the presenting symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Pahlavan
- Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO, USA.,University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Vishal Hegde
- Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel N Bracey
- Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jason M Jennings
- Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Douglas A Dennis
- Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peña P, Ortega MA, Buján J, De la Torre B. Influence of Psychological Distress in Patients with Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty. Treatment Algorithm for Patients with Metal Allergy and Knee Osteoarthritis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:5997. [PMID: 34204981 PMCID: PMC8199888 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on multiples factors, among them is the psychological condition. In addition, up 15 to 30% of the patients that undergo TKA show little or no improvement after surgery, which implies the diagnosis of a painful TKA is a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon, who must rule out a possible metal allergy (MA). It is considered an exclusion diagnosis. Due to the complex relationship between psychological condition and MA, and according to the worse results in patients treated with a hypoallergenic TKA, we asked: (1). What degree of psychological distress (PD) is present in patients who have a hypoallergenic TKA, and how does it influence the results of quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity. (2). Can we develop a new algorithm for patients with a possible MA that improves the outcomes? A pragmatic clinical study was carried out that included patients who underwent hypoallergenic TKA during three consecutive years. Quality of life and functional capacity were measured with (Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) WOMAC index, the Short Form 12 questionnaire (SF-12) questionnaire, and the The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire essentially consists of two pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) (Euro-QoL-5D L-VAS (EQ5D)), in all patients. To assess PD, a Psychological Distress Score was developed. SPSS software was performed to statistical analysis, and Student´s test for independent variables with a p < 0.005 as statistically significant. A total of 72 anallergic TKAs in 64 patients were treated during this period; 31.3% of these patients showed features of PD before the surgery. According with the severity of the PD, 60% were classified as severe, 10% as moderate and 30% as mild. Patients with PD had statistically significant worse results on the final WOMAC, SF-12, and EQ5D questionnaires. The final scores of the physical subscale of the SF-12 and EQ5D showed better results in patients diagnosed by psychiatrist. Up to one third of the patients with hypoallergenic TKAs have PD, and their results are clearly inferior to those patients with MA without PD. When PD was diagnosed according with Psychological Distress Score, patients should be carefully assessed in order to determine if a specialist referral is recommended. According with our results, PD should be assessed either by the PCP or by us. If the PD is confirmed, a psychiatry referral is then requested for better preoperative management and treatment. We believe that this approach would lead to better TKA outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Peña
- Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, Virgen de la Luz Hospital, 16002 Cuenca, Spain;
| | - Miguel A. Ortega
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain;
- Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Julia Buján
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain;
- Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Basilio De la Torre
- Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain
- Service of Traumatology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mayer AS, Erb S, Kim RH, Dennis DA, Shirname-More L, Pratte KA, Barker EA, Maier LA, Pacheco KA. Sensitization to Implant Components Is Associated with Joint Replacement Failure: Identification and Revision to Nonallergenic Hardware Improves Outcomes. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:3109-3117.e1. [PMID: 33744472 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.12.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over 90% of one million annual US joint replacements are highly successful. Nonetheless, 10% do poorly owing to infection or mechanical issues. Many implant components are sensitizers, and sensitization could also contribute to implant failure. OBJECTIVE To determine the prevalence of implant sensitization in joint failure patients, their clinical characteristics, and implant revision outcomes. We hypothesized that sensitized patients would improve when revised with nonallergenic materials. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 105 joint failure patients referred by orthopedic surgeons who had already excluded infection or mechanical causes. Patients provided informed consent, completed a history and physical examination, patch testing to metals and bone cement, and a nickel lymphocyte proliferation test. A study coordinator was able to contact 64% of patients (n = 67) 9 to 12 months later to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS A total of 59% were sensitized to an implant component: 32% to metal and 37% to bone cement. The nickel lymphocyte proliferation test was 60% sensitive and 96% specific in diagnosing nickel sensitization. Most sensitized subjects reported no or uncertain histories of reactions to a specific material. Implant sensitized patients were younger and reported previous eczema, joint itching, and implant loosening. By 9 to 12 months later, most patients with a revised implant (revised) described significant improvement (16 of 22 revised for sensitization [P = .0003] vs 9 of 13 revised without sensitization [P = .047]) compared with patients without implant revision). All revised patients with sensitization used components to which they were not sensitized. Pain (P = .001), swelling (P = .035), and instability (P = .006) were significantly reduced in the revised sensitized group. CONCLUSIONS Sensitization to implant components is an important cause of unexplained joint replacement failure. Joint revisions based on sensitization information resulted in significant improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annyce S Mayer
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo; Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Colorado School of Medicine, School of Public Health, Aurora, Colo
| | - Samantha Erb
- Graduate Medical Education, Northside Hospital, St Petersburg, Fla
| | | | - Douglas A Dennis
- Department of Bioengineering, Daniel Felix Ritchie School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Denver, Denver, Colo; Department of Orthopedics, CU Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Lata Shirname-More
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | | | - Elizabeth A Barker
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | - Lisa A Maier
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo; Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Colorado School of Medicine, School of Public Health, Aurora, Colo; Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colo
| | - Karin A Pacheco
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo; Division of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Colorado School of Medicine, School of Public Health, Aurora, Colo.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sasseville D, Alfalah K, Savin E. Patch Test Results and Outcome in Patients with Complications from Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Consecutive Case Series. J Knee Surg 2021; 34:233-241. [PMID: 31434145 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1694984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The role of hypersensitivity in implant-related complications remains controversial. The objectives of our study were to (1) establish the prevalence of hypersensitivity to components of knee prostheses in patients referred to our contact dermatitis clinic, (2) determine if patients with post-surgery dermatitis have become sensitized, and (3) describe the outcome of patients with and without hypersensitivity. We reviewed the charts of patients referred from 2007 to 2018 and extracted demographic information, date, type, and site of implant, clinical presentation, and results of patch testing (PT) or lymphocyte transformation tests (LTT). We called most patients to gather data such as clinical outcome, nature, and timing of additional surgery. Statistical analysis included computation of conventional descriptive statistics. Because of the type of study design, only some categorical variables were tested for possible associations by analytical tools (cross-tabulation). Thirty-nine patients, 23 men (59.0%), and 16 women (41.0%), were included. Their mean age in years was 63.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 60.9-65.7) ranging from 39.0 to 79.0, (standard deviation) = 9.69, without statistically significant differences between males and females. Five patients had positive PT possibly relevant to their implant. Four patients had revision surgery and two improved. Of nine patients with dermatitis, one with relevant PT did not improve after revision, and the dermatitis was unrelated to TKA in eight. Of the 26 patients without dermatitis or relevant PT results, 9 had revisions because of incapacitating symptoms, and 5 improved. Hypersensitivity to implant components is a potential factor in the etiology of TKA complications. Patients with confirmed hypersensitivity may benefit from revision. Our study, however, did not detect statistically significant differences in outcome of revision surgery between patients with positive versus negative PT or LTT. In spite of this, we consider that patients with a history suggestive of metal, acrylate or aminoglycoside allergy should be tested preoperatively to avoid hypersensitivity-related postoperative complications. In the absence of hypersensitivity, some patients with incapacitating symptoms may also improve following revision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Sasseville
- Division of Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Khuzama Alfalah
- Division of Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| | - Evgeny Savin
- Division of Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thomas P, Summer B, Thyssen JP. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Orthopedic Implants. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
13
|
Peña P, Ortega MA, Buján J, De la Torre B. Decrease of Quality of Life, Functional Assessment and Associated Psychological Distress in Patients with Hypoallergenic Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3270. [PMID: 33053865 PMCID: PMC7601743 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the final treatment for knee osteoarthritis, and 15-30% of patients show little or no improvement. This high percentage is related to aspects of the surgical technique, the selected implant, and specific patient characteristics. The aim of this study was to analyze whether there are differences in quality of life (QoL) and functional capacity among patients undergoing TKA with conventional implants compared to those treated with hypoallergenic oxinium implants. A pragmatic clinical study was carried out that included patients who underwent TKA between January 2013 and December 2015. During this period, 245 knees in 228 patients were treated. Eleven patients were excluded, leaving a sample of 161 conventionally treated knees, 72 knees treated with hypoallergenic implants, and one patient who received both implant types. In all patients, QoL and functional capacity were measured with the WOMAC index, the SF-12 questionnaire, and the Euro-Qol-5D L-VAS. We also assessed the psychological distress of each patient and related the findings to the functional results. The differences in QoL were tested using ANCOVA and propensity score matching (PSM) models adjusted for sex, age, weight, psychiatric history and associated complications. Patients who underwent TKA using conventional prostheses had significantly better scores on the total WOMAC index and in the pain domain (p < 0.05) than those who received hypoallergenic prostheses, but no significant differences were observed for the other domains in the ANCOVA. In contrast, with the PSM, we also found statistically significant differences in the difficulty domain of the WOMAC. Significant differences were found for the SF-12 mental health questionnaire results (p = 0.038), but the same did not occur for the physical health domain in the ANCOVA and PSM. We also found statistically significant differences in the Euro-Qol-5D index results (p = 0.041), but not in the VAS scale scores for the same questionnaire in the ANCOVA, and we did not find significant differences in either with the PSM. Patients with metal allergies and those who present psychological distress had WOMAC, SF-12, and Euro-Qol-5D results that were statistically significantly worse than those of patients who received conventional implants. Patients who underwent hypoallergic TKA had lower scores on the QoL and functional capacity scales than patients who received conventional Cr-Co implants. Additionally, patients with psychological distress had worse results on the questionnaires, and those with a metal allergy had even lower scores; the differences were statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Peña
- Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology Service, Virgen de la Luz Hospital, 16002 Cuenca, Spain;
| | - Miguel A. Ortega
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain;
- Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Julia Buján
- Departments of Medicine and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain;
- Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Basilio De la Torre
- Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain;
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Madrid, Spain
- Service of Traumatology, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thomas B, Benedikt M, Alamri A, Kapp F, Bader R, Summer B, Thomas P, Oppel E. The role of antibiotic-loaded bone cement in complicated knee arthroplasty: relevance of gentamicin allergy and benefit from revision surgery - a case control follow-up study and algorithmic approach. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15:319. [PMID: 32787962 PMCID: PMC7425164 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01855-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic-loaded (particularly gentamicin) bone cement (BC) is widely used in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) to prevent periprosthetic infections (PPIs), but may itself cause implant failure. In light of a complete lack in literature, the objective was to assess the clinical relevance of gentamicin allergy for failure of cemented total knee arthroplasties in 25 out of 250 patients with positive patch test reactions to gentamicin and otherwise unexplained symptoms by evaluating benefits from revision with change to gentamicin-free cement. METHODS Fifteen of these 25 patients and their treating orthopaedic surgeons agreed to a re-assessment. They were surveyed regarding interim course of therapy and symptoms, including re-assessment of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and underwent follow-up clinical and radiographic investigations. The initial use of gentamicin-loaded BC was reaffirmed by review of the primary implantation operative reports and respective implant passports. Primary and follow-up KOOS scores were analyzed regarding benefits from revision surgery by comparing nine patients with revision to six without revision. RESULTS Mean follow-up time was 38 months. The entirety of patients experienced an improvement of self-reported symptoms, with revision surgery (i.e., switching to gentamicin-free BC or uncemented total knee arthroplasty) yielding significantly greater improvement (p = 0.031): the nine revised patients reported a significant symptom relief (p = 0.028), contrary to the six unrevised patients (p = 0.14). Interestingly, the decision to proceed with revision surgery was significantly correlated with higher symptom severity (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION In symptomatic total knee arthroplasty with gentamicin allergy, uncemented revision arthroplasty or change to gentamicin-free BC provides significant symptom relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Thomas
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center, University of Heidelberg, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
| | - Maria Benedikt
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany.,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ali Alamri
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Kapp
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Rainer Bader
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rostock, Doberaner Strasse 142, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Burkhard Summer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Thomas
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva Oppel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thomas P, Summer B, Thyssen JP. Orthopedic Implants. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_80-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Thomas P, Summer B, Thyssen JP. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Orthopedic Implants. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_80-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
17
|
Schoon J, Ort MJ, Huesker K, Geissler S, Rakow A. Diagnosis of Metal Hypersensitivity in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Front Immunol 2019; 10:2758. [PMID: 31827473 PMCID: PMC6890602 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions are considered infrequent complications in arthroplasty, but have been recognized to be associated with devastating morbidity and substantial decrease in quality of life of affected patients. Chronic inflammation of artificial joints and associated loss of peri-implant bone often require revision surgery. Methods for the diagnosis of implant-related DTH are available but infrequently considered to the full extent. Sequential diagnostics based on exclusion of septic complications, local and systemic metal level determination, lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT), and local T cell subset analysis are required for an unequivocal DTH diagnosis. Here, we report on a patient with a history of chronic rheumatoid arthritis and an unfavorable outcome of unilateral knee arthroplasty. This case illustrates pitfalls and difficulties in the course of recurrent inflammation following joint replacement. In the early course, suspicion of low-grade bacterial infection led to three two-stage revisions. Afterwards, the joint was proven to be sterile. However, metal level quantification revealed release of especially cobalt and chromium from the joint, LTT indicated persisting cobalt and nickel sensitization and subset analysis of T cells from the synovium suggested DTH as a root cause for the inflammatory symptoms. This report aims to recommend the depicted diagnostic algorithm as an adequate tool for future DTH detection. Yet, systemic to local subset ratios for effector memory and regulatory T cells should be derived from sufficient patient numbers to establish it as a diagnostic marker. Moreover, future prospects regarding implant-related DTH diagnostics are discussed. Therapeutic options for the portrayed patient are proposed, considering pharmaceutical, cell-therapeutic and surgical aspects. Patients who experience peri-implant inflammation but do not have obvious mechanical or infectious problems remain a diagnostic challenge and are at high risk of being treated inadequately. Since potentially sensitizing materials are regularly used in arthroplasty, it is essential to detect cases of acute DTH-derived inflammation of an artificial joint at early postoperative stages. This would reduce the severity of inflammation-related long-term consequences for affected patients and may avoid unnecessary revision surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janosch Schoon
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Melanie J Ort
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katrin Huesker
- Immunology Department, Institute for Medical Diagnostics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Geissler
- Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anastasia Rakow
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany.,Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
There are very few reports of eczema and other prosthetic-related allergic skin complications following arthroplasty. We aimed to assess the risk of eczema after joint replacement.We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study in 2024 joint replacement patients using the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. For comparison, 8096 controls were selected, with 4 control subjects for each joint replacement patient matched for age, sex, and index year, to assess eczema risk. We examined 14-year cumulative eczema incidence associated with age, sex, immunity, disease history, and joint replacement location.Eczema rates in the joint replacement patients were 38% higher than in the control group (57.90 vs 41.84 per 1000 person-years, respectively). Compared with the control group, joint replacement patients showed a 1.35-fold increased risk of eczema according to the multivariable Cox model (95% Confidence interval [CI] = 1.23-1.49). Knee replacement patients had higher eczema risk compared with the control group (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.33-1.70). Stratified by study period, the joint replacement cohort had a higher eczema risk after the 3-month follow-up.Our study revealed that joint arthroplasty increased risk of eczema in this 14-year follow-up study, and this was not related to personal atopic history or gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Yuan Wu
- Department of Dermatology, China Medical University Hospital
- School of Medicine, China Medical University
| | | | - Chun-Hao Tsai
- School of Medicine, China Medical University
- Department of Orthopedics, China Medical University Hospital
- Department of Sports Medicine/School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Iijima S, Tsunoda T. Twenty cases of allergic contact dermatitis due to benzoyl peroxide in acne patients in Japan. JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/cia2.12069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeruko Iijima
- Hanamizuki Clinic Ushiku Japan
- Ryugasaki Saiseikai General Hospital Ryugasaki Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fröschen FS, Gravius N, Lau JF, Randau TM, Kaup E, Friedrich MJ, Gravius S. A case series of cementless revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with benzoyl peroxide allergy. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2018; 43:2323-2331. [PMID: 30539218 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4273-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The contact allergens nickel, cobalt, and chromium are often discussed as possible triggers of allergic reactions to orthopedic implants. Additionally, acrylates and polymerization additives in bone cement (e.g., benzoyl peroxide (BPO)) have been implicated as triggers of eczema, wound healing disorders, and aseptic implant loosening. We report about six patients with aseptic loosening after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), who underwent revision surgery after testing positive for BPO hypersensitivity. METHODS After clarification of possible other causes of implant failure, epicutaneous testing had been performed and the implants were replaced in a two-stage procedure with cementless, diaphyseal anchoring, hypoallergenic (TiNb-coated) revision endoprostheses. RESULTS Epicutaneous testing revealed a BPO allergy in all six patients and an additional nickel allergy in three of the six patients. There was no histopathological or microbiological evidence for a periprosthetic infection. The clinical follow-up showed a low level of pain with good function, a stable knee joint, and proper implant position. The Knee Society Score (KSS) with its subscales Knee Score and Functional Score improved post-operatively from 43 to 70 points and from 47.5 to 68.3 points, respectively. Two implant-specific complications occurred: femoral stress shielding two years post-operatively with no further need for action and aseptic loosening of the tibial stem with the need of revision three years post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS The regression of complaints after replacement with cementless and nickel-free revision implants suggests allergic implant intolerance. Implantation of a cementless, hypoallergenic endoprosthesis might, therefore, be a surgical treatment strategy in patients with evidence of allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank S Fröschen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
| | - Nadine Gravius
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan-Frederic Lau
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Martin Randau
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Eva Kaup
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Max J Friedrich
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Sascha Gravius
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Navarro SM, Haeberle HS, Sokunbi OF, Frankel WC, Wera GD, Mont MA, Ramkumar PN. The Evidence Behind Peroxide in Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedics 2018; 41:e756-e764. [PMID: 30321442 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20181010-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Peroxide is a strong oxidizing agent and disinfectant frequently used in orthopedic surgery. The authors conducted a systematic literature review of peroxide in orthopedic surgery, evaluating use, complications, efficacy, and appropriate concentrations. One hundred seventy-five reports were identified, with 24 being eligible for analysis. Orthopedic surgeons used peroxide for irrigation and bacterial reduction in various procedures. Complications included cytotoxicity, allergic reactions, suture damage, and inflammation. Use of the standard concentration of 3% peroxide and standard time in situ are without evidence. Laboratory studies suggest that diluted concentrations retain the benefit of bacterial decolonization without increasing the risk for complications. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e756-e764.].
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Furrer S, Scherer Hofmeier K, Grize L, Bircher AJ. Metal hypersensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implant complications-A retrospective clinical study. Contact Dermatitis 2018; 79:91-98. [PMID: 29888396 DOI: 10.1111/cod.13032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypersensitivity to metals as a cause of implant-related complications has been a subject of controversy. Projections indicate an increase in the frequency of joint replacements of between 300% and 600% by the year 2030; therefore, this issue is of considerable interest. OBJECTIVE To evaluate sensitization to implant materials in patients with implant-related complications, to identify allergens, and to clarify whether hypersensitivity is a relevant cause. METHODS Patients with implant-related complications or a positive history of contact allergy and planned total joint replacements referred for allergological investigation between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS In total, 311 patients were included. A positive patch test reaction to a metal was seen in 64.4% of preoperative patients and in 54.6% of patients with implant-related complications. Common alloy metals such as cobalt, chromium and titanium gave positive reactions in up to 2.9% of patients with implant-related complications. None of the patients with skin changes had a positive patch test reaction to an implant metal. CONCLUSION Other factors, such as the type of replaced joint and mechanical stress, seem to be more relevant for implant-related complications. Sensitization to metals or other materials seems to rarely play a role, and is overestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Furrer
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy Unit, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Leticia Grize
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Andreas J Bircher
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy Unit, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Allergic or hypersensitivity reactions to orthopaedic implants can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Although 10% to 15% of the population exhibits cutaneous sensitivity to metals, deep-tissue reactions to metal implants are comparatively rare. Nevertheless, the link between cutaneous sensitivity and clinically relevant deep-tissue reactions is unclear. Most reactions to orthopaedic devices are type IV, or delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. The most commonly implicated allergens are nickel, cobalt, and chromium; however, reactions to nonmetal compounds, such as polymethyl methacrylate, antibiotic spacers, and suture materials, have also been reported. Symptoms of hypersensitivity to implants are nonspecific and include pain, swelling, stiffness, and localized skin reactions. Following arthroplasty, internal fixation, or implantation of similarly allergenic devices, the persistence or early reappearance of inflammatory symptoms should raise suspicions for hypersensitivity. However, hypersensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion. Infection, as well as aseptic loosening, particulate synovitis, instability, and other causes of failure must first be eliminated.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sandre M, Skotnicki-Grant S. A Case of a Paediatric Patient With Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Benzoyl Peroxide. J Cutan Med Surg 2017; 22:226-228. [PMID: 28922933 DOI: 10.1177/1203475417733462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide can occur in up to 6.5% of those with a history of exposure to this potential allergen. Conversely, irritant contact dermatitis is very common with benzoyl peroxide and can be differentiated from allergic contact dermatitis based on the patient's history and clinical signs and symptoms. We present a case of a paediatric patient with patch test-confirmed severe allergic contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide requiring hospitalisation and systemic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Sandre
- 1 Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,2 Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sandra Skotnicki-Grant
- 1 Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,3 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wawrzynski J, Gil JA, Goodman AD, Waryasz GR. Hypersensitivity to Orthopedic Implants: A Review of the Literature. Rheumatol Ther 2017; 4:45-56. [PMID: 28364382 PMCID: PMC5443731 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-017-0062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Awareness of rare etiologies for implant failure is becoming increasingly important. In addition to the overall increase in joint arthroplasties, revision surgeries are projected to increase dramatically in the coming years, with volume increasing up to seven-fold between 2005 and 2030. The literature regarding the relationship between metal allergy and implant failure is controversial. It has proven difficult to determine whether sensitization is a cause or a consequence of implant failure. Testing patients with functional implants is not a clinically useful approach, as the rate of hypersensitivity is higher in implant recipients than in the general population, regardless of the status of the implant. As a result of the ineffectiveness of preoperative patch testing for predicting adverse outcomes, as well as the high cost of implementing such patch testing as standard procedure, most orthopedists and dermatologists agree that an alternative prosthesis should only be considered for patients with a history of allergy to a metal in the standard implant. In patients with a failed implant requiring revision surgery, hypersensitivity to an implant component should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Because a metal allergy to implant components is currently not commonly considered in the differential for joint failure in the orthopedic literature, there should be improved communication and collaboration between orthopedists and dermatologists when evaluating joint replacement patients with a presentation suggestive of allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph A Gil
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Avi D Goodman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gregory R Waryasz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lohmann CH, Hameister R, Singh G. Allergies in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103:S75-S81. [PMID: 28043850 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Hypersensitivity reactions to implants in orthopaedic and trauma surgery are a rare but devastating complication. They are considered as a delayed-type of hypersensitivity reaction (type IV), characterized by an antigen activation of sensitized T-lymphocytes releasing various cytokines and may result in osteoclast activation and bone resorption. Potential haptens are originated from metal alloys or bone-cement. A meta-analysis has confirmed a higher probability of developing a metal hypersensitivity postoperatively and noted a greater risk of failed replacements compared to stable implants. Hypersensitivity to implants may present with a variety of symptoms such as pain, joint effusion, delayed wound/bone healing, persistent secretion, allergic dermatitis (localized or systemic), clicking noises, loss of joint function, instability and failure of the implant. Various diagnostic options have been offered, including patch testing, metal alloy patch testing, histology, lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay (MELISA), leukocyte migration inhibition test (LIF) and lymphocyte activation test (LAT). No significant differences between in vivo and in vitro methods have been found. Due to unconvincing evidence for screening methods, predictive tests are not recommended for routine performance. Infectious aetiology always needs to be excluded. As there is a lack of evidence on large-scale studies with regards to the optimal treatment option, management currently relies on individual case-by-case decisions. Several options for patients with (suspected) metal-related hypersensitivity exist and may include materials based on ceramic, titanium or oxinium or modified surfaces. Promising results have been reported, but long-term experience is lacking. More large-scaled studies are needed in this context. In patients with bone-cement hypersensitivity, the component suspected for hypersensitivity should be avoided. The development of (predictive) biomarkers is considered as a major contribution for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C H Lohmann
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, 44, Leipziger Strasse, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
| | - R Hameister
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, 44, Leipziger Strasse, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Anatomy, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 4, Medical Drive, 117594, Singapore
| | - G Singh
- Division of Musculoskeletal Oncology, University Orthopaedics, Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery Cluster, National University Health System, 1E, Kent Ridge Road, 119228, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park CN, White PB, Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Diagnostic Algorithm for Residual Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2016; 39:e246-52. [PMID: 26811953 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160119-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Although total knee arthroplasty is a successful and cost-effective procedure, patient dissatisfaction remains as high as 50%. Postoperative residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty, with or without crepitation, is a major factor that contributes to patient dissatisfaction. The most common location for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty is anteriorly. Because residual pain has been associated with an un-resurfaced patella, this review includes only registry data and total knee arthroplasty with patella replacement. Some suggest that the pathogenesis of residual knee pain may be related to mechanical stimuli that activate free nerve endings around the patellofemoral joint. Various etiologies have been implicated in residual pain, including (1) low-grade infection, (2) midflexion instability, and (3) component malalignment with patellar maltracking. Less common causes include (4) crepitation and patellar clunk syndrome; (5) patellofemoral symptoms, including overstuffing and avascular necrosis of the patella; (6) early aseptic loosening; (7) hypersensitivity to metal or cement; (8) complex regional pain syndrome; and (9) pseudoaneurysm. Because all of these conditions can lead to residual pain, identifying the etiology can be a difficult diagnostic challenge. Often, patients with persistent pain and normal findings on radiographs and laboratory workup may benefit from a diagnostic injection or further imaging. However, up to 10% to 15% of patients with residual pain may have unexplained pain. This literature review summarizes the findings on the causes of residual pain and presents a diagnostic algorithm to facilitate an accurate diagnosis for residual pain after total knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
|
29
|
Prosthetic and Device Surgery Considerations. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-016-0101-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
30
|
Hagen SL, Grey KR, Hylwa SA. Allergic contact dermatitis to Dermabond™: A case and review of the literature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wndm.2016.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
31
|
A rare case of pseudotumor formation associated with methyl methacrylate hypersensitivity in a patient following cemented total knee arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2016; 45:1115-22. [PMID: 27022733 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-016-2372-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Revised: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Hypersensitivity to orthopedic implant materials has been well documented with potential catastrophic consequences if not addressed pre-operatively. The spectrum of reactions is wide, from mild non-specific pain with localized erythema to severe periprosthetic inflammatory destruction and pseudotumor formation. It is therefore essential to identify patients who have or are at risk for implant-associated hypersensitivity. Although metal sensitivity is commonly cited as the cause of these reactions, methyl methacrylate (MMA) has rarely been implicated. To the best of our knowledge, methyl methacrylate-associated pseudotumor formation has not yet been described. The following is a case report of a 68-year-old female who, after undergoing a routine cemented right total knee arthroplasty, developed a painless, enlarging mass during a 13-year period. This mass was found to be a pseudotumor in association with methyl methacrylate hypersensitivity. A review of pseudotumor pathogenesis, methyl methacrylate hypersensitivity, and preoperative preventative care is discussed.
Collapse
|
32
|
Allergy to Surgical Implants. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2016; 3:683-95. [PMID: 26362550 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Revised: 07/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Surgical implants have a wide array of therapeutic uses, most commonly in joint replacements, but also in repair of pes excavatum and spinal disorders, in cardiac devices (stents, patches, pacers, valves), in gynecological implants, and in dentistry. Many of the metals used are immunologically active, as are the methacrylates and epoxies used in conjunction with several of these devices. Allergic responses to surgical components can present atypically as failure of the device, with nonspecific symptoms of localized pain, swelling, warmth, loosening, instability, itching, or burning; localized rash is infrequent. Identification of the specific metal and cement components used in a particular implant can be difficult, but is crucial to guide testing and interpretation of results. Nickel, cobalt, and chromium remain the most common metals implicated in implant failure due to metal sensitization; methacrylate-based cements are also important contributors. This review will provide a guide on how to assess and interpret the clinical history, identify the components used in surgery, test for sensitization, and provide advice on possible solutions. Data on the pathways of metal-induced immune stimulation are included. In this setting, the allergist, the dermatologist, or both have the potential to significantly improve surgical outcomes and patient care.
Collapse
|
33
|
Vega F, Bazire R, Belver MT, Mugica MV, Urquia A, Blanco C. Aseptic loosening of a total knee prosthesis caused by delayed hypersensitivity to bone cement. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2016; 117:89-91. [PMID: 27161544 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2016] [Revised: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Vega
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Raphaelle Bazire
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Teresa Belver
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Victoria Mugica
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andres Urquia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Blanco
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Krenn V, Perino G, Krenn VT, Wienert S, Saberi D, Hügle T, Hopf F, Huber M. [Histopathological diagnostic work-up of joint endoprosthesis-associated pathologies]. DER HAUTARZT 2016; 67:365-72. [PMID: 26987961 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-016-3778-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Increasing classes of joint implants and the combination of materials results in increased and wear-associated pathologies. According to the revised consensus classification, the following types can be recognized at conventional histological examination: Type I, particle-induced type; Type II, infection type; Type III, combination type; Type IV, indifferent type; Type V arthrofibrotic type; Type VI, allergic/immunological/toxic adverse reactions and Type VII, bone pathologies. Wear particles are histopathologically characterized according to the Krenn particle algorithm which focuses on a descriptive identification of wear particles and the differentiation of other nonwear-related particles. Type VII is considered histologically when there is evidence of a perivascular/interstitial lymphocytic CD20- and CD3-positive infiltrate, presence of mast cells and eosinophils, and tissue necrosis/infarction associated with implant wear material. Since wear particle-induced toxicity cannot be differentiated with certainty from hypersensitivity/allergic reaction on histological examination, immunological-allergological and clinical data should be used as supplementary criteria for the differential diagnosis. Tissue sampling should be performed from periprosthetic soft tissue with location mapping and when feasible also from bone tissue. Additional information regarding the type of implant and clinical, radiological, immunological, and microbiology data should be available to the pathologist. Further immunohistochemical studies are recommended in the following settings: infection (CD15, CD20, CD68); prosthesis-associated arthrofibrosis (β‑catenin); allergic/immunologic/toxic adverse reactions (CD20, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD117 and for T‑cell characterization T‑bet, GATA-3, and FOXP3).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Krenn
- MVZ-Zentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Max-Planck-Str. 5, 54296, Trier, Deutschland.
| | - G Perino
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA
| | - V T Krenn
- Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Wienert
- VMscope GmbH Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - D Saberi
- MVZ-Zentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Max-Planck-Str. 5, 54296, Trier, Deutschland
| | - T Hügle
- Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Schweiz
| | - F Hopf
- MVZ-Zentrum für Histologie, Zytologie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Max-Planck-Str. 5, 54296, Trier, Deutschland
| | - M Huber
- Pathologisch-bakteriologisches Institut, Otto Wagner Spital, Wien, Österreich
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fonacier L, Bernstein DI, Pacheco K, Holness DL, Blessing-Moore J, Khan D, Lang D, Nicklas R, Oppenheimer J, Portnoy J, Randolph C, Schuller D, Spector S, Tilles S, Wallace D. Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter-update 2015. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2016; 3:S1-39. [PMID: 25965350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
This parameter was developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, which represents the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI); the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI); and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The AAAAI and the ACAAI have jointly accepted responsibility for establishing "Contact Dermatitis: A Practice Parameter-Update 2015." This is a complete and comprehensive document at the current time. The medical environment is changing and not all recommendations will be appropriate or applicable to all patients. Because this document incorporated the efforts of many participants, no single individual, including members serving on the Joint Task Force, are authorized to provide an official AAAAI or ACAAI interpretation of these practice parameters. Any request for information or interpretation of this practice parameter by the AAAAI or ACAAI should be directed to the Executive Offices of the AAAAI, the ACAAI, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. These parameters are not designed for use by the pharmaceutical industry in drug development or promotion. Previously published practice parameters of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters for Allergy & Immunology are available at http://www.JCAAI.org or http://www.allergyparameters.org.
Collapse
|
36
|
Thomas B, Kulichova D, Wolf R, Summer B, Mahler V, Thomas P. High frequency of contact allergy to implant and bone cement components, in particular gentamicin, in cemented arthroplasty with complications: usefulness of late patch test reading. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73:343-9. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2015] [Revised: 07/21/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Thomas
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians-University; 80337 Munich Germany
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | - Daniela Kulichova
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians-University; 80337 Munich Germany
| | - Ronald Wolf
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians-University; 80337 Munich Germany
| | - Burkhard Summer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians-University; 80337 Munich Germany
| | - Vera Mahler
- Department of Dermatology; University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University; 91054 Erlangen Germany
| | - Peter Thomas
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology; Ludwig-Maximilians-University; 80337 Munich Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Thomas P, Summer B. Diagnosis and management of patients with allergy to metal implants. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 11:501-9. [DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2015.1016501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
38
|
Thomas P. Clinical and diagnostic challenges of metal implant allergy using the example of orthopaedic surgical implants: Part 15 of the Series Molecular Allergology. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 23:179-185. [PMID: 26120529 PMCID: PMC4479460 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-014-0023-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The focus of this review are allergic reactions to orthopaedic-surgical metal implants. The spectrum of metal implant associated potential allergic reactions encompasses eczema, impaired wound and fracture healing, infection-mimicking reactions, effusions, pain and loosening. Nickel, cobalt and chromium seem to be the predominant eliciting allergens. Despite the growing number of respective publications the topic „metal implant allergy“ remains a diagnostic challenge. Initially, differential diagnoses should always be excluded in cooperation with surgery collegues. It is recommended to perform a combined evaluation of medical history, clinical findings, patch testing and histology. The lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) can indicate metal sensitization, but it needs careful interpretation. Allergists can provide a substantial contribution to this interdisciplinary topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Thomas
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Frauenlobstraße 9-11, 80337 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Thomas P. Klinische und diagnostische Herausforderungen der Metallimplantatallergie am Beispiel orthopädisch-chirurgischer Implantate. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-014-0650-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
Pinson ML, Coop CA, Webb CN. Metal hypersensitivity in total joint arthroplasty. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 113:131-6. [PMID: 24934108 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2014.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2014] [Revised: 05/13/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the clinical manifestations, testing methods, and treatment options for hypersensitivity reactions to total joint arthroplasty procedures. DATA SOURCES Studies were identified using MEDLINE and reference lists of key articles. STUDY SELECTIONS Randomized controlled trials were selected when available. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of peer-reviewed literature were included, as were case series and observational studies of clinical interest. RESULTS Total joint arthroplasty procedures are increasing, as are the hypersensitivity reactions to these implants. Evidence is not conclusive as to whether metal joint implants increase metal sensitivity or whether metal sensitivity leads to prosthesis failure. Currently, patch testing is still the most widely used method for determining metal hypersensitivity; however, there are no standardized commercial panels specific for total joint replacements available currently. In vitro testing has shown comparable results in some studies, but its use in the clinical setting may be limited by the cost and need for specialized laboratories. Hypersensitivity testing is generally recommended before surgery for patients with a reported history of metal sensitivity. In cases of metal hypersensitivity-related joint failure, surgical revision ultimately may be required. Knowledge about joint replacement hypersensitivity reactions becomes vital because the approach to the evaluation depends on appropriate testing to guide recommendations for future arthroplasty procedures. CONCLUSION Evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions after total joint arthroplasty requires a systematic approach, including a careful history, targeted evaluation with skin testing, and in vitro studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Pinson
- Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology Division, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, Texas.
| | - Christopher A Coop
- Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology Division, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Charles N Webb
- Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology Division, Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) refers to a skin condition where an individual who is cutaneously sensitized to an allergen will subsequently react to that same allergen or a cross-reacting allergen via the systemic route. It occurs to allergens including metals, medications, and foods. There has been recent interest in metal allergy as it relates to the implantation of devices such as orthopedic, dental, cardiac, and gynecologic implants. This review will briefly address all causes of systemic contact dermatitis with a special and expanded focus on metal implant allergy. We present literature on SCD to various metal biomedical devices, patch testing for diagnosis of metal allergy pre and post implantation and treatment.
Collapse
|
42
|
Histopathologische Differenzialdiagnostik bei gelenkimplantatallergischen Fragestellungen. DER ORTHOPADE 2013; 42:614-21. [DOI: 10.1007/s00132-012-2034-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
43
|
Petit A. [What's new in clinical dermatology?]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2013; 139 Suppl 5:S177-87. [PMID: 23522704 DOI: 10.1016/s0151-9638(12)70132-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Medical articles published between September 2011 and September 2012 were selected based on themes related to clinical dermatology. Therapeutics, pediatrics, oncology, sexually transmitted diseases, and major system diseases such as sarcoidosis and connective tissue disease were not retained. The subjects reviewed were: (i) epidemiology, particularly the risks of exposure to infectious agents; (ii) diagnostic tools, dominated by dermoscopy and teledermatology; (iii) the description of new disorders and the reassessment of older diseases; (iv) complementary tests in certain types of dermatosis; (v) a few large "works in progress" in dermatology, where clinical aspects and biological research intertwine and contribute one to the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Petit
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bibliography Current World Literature. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2012. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0b013e31827525d3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|