1
|
Korbi M, Ouni N, Lahouel I, Machghoul S, Othmen Y, Belhadjali H, Zrig M, Koubaa M, Abid A, Henchi MA, Zili J. Contact Allergy to Methyl Methacrylate in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Challenging Diagnosis. Dermatitis 2023. [PMID: 38112522 DOI: 10.1089/derm.2022.29026.kmo] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mouna Korbi
- From the Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
- Research Laboratory LR20SP03A
| | - Nour Ouni
- From the Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Ines Lahouel
- From the Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
- Research Laboratory LR20SP03A
| | - Samia Machghoul
- Occupational Medicine Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Youssef Othmen
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Hichem Belhadjali
- From the Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
- Research Laboratory LR20SP03A
| | - Makrem Zrig
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Moustapha Koubaa
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Abderrazek Abid
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Mohamed Adnène Henchi
- Occupational Medicine Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
| | - Jameleddine Zili
- From the Dermatology Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tuniisia
- Research Laboratory LR20SP03A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Occupational Contact Dermatitis in Dental Personnel: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001 to 2018. Dermatitis 2022; 33:80-90. [PMID: 35029351 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dental personnel are at risk of developing occupational contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were to determine prevalence of occupational contact dermatitis in dental personnel referred for patch testing and to characterize relevant allergens and sources. METHODS The study used a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data, 2001-2018. RESULTS Of 41,109 patients, 585 (1.4%) were dental personnel. Dental personnel were significantly more likely than nondental personnel to be female (75.7% vs 67.4%, P < 0.0001), have occupationally related dermatitis (35.7% vs 11.5%, P < 0.0001), and/or have primary hand involvement (48.6% vs 22.5%, P < 0.0001). More than one quarter of dental personnel (62/585, 27.7%) had 1 or more occupationally related allergic patch test reaction(s). There were 249 occupationally related reactions to NACDG screening allergens, most commonly glutaraldehyde (18.1%), thiuram mix (16.1%), and carba mix (14.1%). The most common sources of NACDG screening allergens were gloves (30.7%), dental materials (26.6%), and sterilizing solutions (13.1%). Seventy-three dental personnel (12.5%) had 1 or more positive patch test reactions to occupationally related allergen(s)/substances not on the screening series. Occupationally related irritant contact dermatitis was identified in 22.2% (n = 130) of dental personnel, most commonly to nonskin soaps/detergents/disinfectants (32.0%). CONCLUSIONS Occupational contact dermatitis is common in dental personnel referred for patch testing. Comprehensive testing beyond screening series is important in these patients.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mahler V, Uter W. Epicutaneous Patch Testing in Type IV Allergy Diagnostics: State of the Art and Best Practice Recommendations. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022; 268:405-433. [PMID: 34312717 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
This chapter summarises all relevant aspects of patch testing, closely following recommendations outlined in a recent European, and a German S3 guideline on diagnostic patch testing with contact allergens and medicinal products (drugs). Patch testing is indicated in patients suspected of suffering, or having been suffering, from delayed-type hypersensitivity leading to allergic contact dermatitis or other skin and mucosal diseases. Sections of this chapter include detailed indications, reasons for possibly postponing the test, considerations on choosing haptens (contact allergens) to test, various aspects of the application of patch test allergen preparations (storage, dosing) and of testing with individual materials provided by the patients. Special aspects of patch testing in cutaneous adverse drug reactions, children, or occupational contact dermatitis are outlined. Supplemental test methods, notably the repeated open application test, are briefly described. Finally, the final evaluation in terms of assessment of clinical relevance of reactions and patient counselling are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mahler
- Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chipinda I, Anderson SE, Siegel PD. Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2021; 41:423-438. [PMID: 34225898 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2021.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the laboratory's role in identifying causes of chemical-induced allergic dermatitis. Several topics will be discussed. Allergen hazard identification refers to testing of chemicals for their sensitization potential. Animal-based, in silico, in chemico, and in vitro tests have been developed to identify the skin sensitization hazard of potential chemical allergens, but only a few of these are accepted by regulatory agencies. Laboratory investigations have also evaluated the stability of several commercially available allergic contact dermatitis patch tests. Such studies are considered product testing and are usually conducted in analytical chemistry laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itai Chipinda
- Global Product Stewardship & Toxicology, Phillips 66, Bartlesville, OK 74003, USA
| | - Stacey E Anderson
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
| | - Paul D Siegel
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mahajan VK, Chauhan PS, Mehta KS, Sharma A, Chowdhary B, Dhattarwal N, Sharma H, Chandel M, Verma YR. Patch testing with expired Indian patch test kits: Results of a pilot study. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021; 88:188-195. [PMID: 33969657 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_390_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reliability of patch testing with expired Indian standard patch test kits has been not evaluated before. METHODS Thirty adults (men:women 25:5) with allergic contact dermatitis were divided into three groups of ten patients each for patch testing by Finn chamber® method using Indian standard patch test kits having expiry in 2016, 2015 and 2014. The results were compared with those from a new kit with 2018 expiry. RESULTS Ten patients in group-1, eight patients in group-2 and seven patients in group-3 developed positive reactions of identical intensities and mostly from identical allergens from all four kits. The major contact allergens eliciting positive reactions of identical intensities were parthenium in nine, five and three patients, colophony in four, one and zero patients, fragrance mix in three, three and one patients, thiuram mix in three, one and one patients, and paraphenylene diamine in two, one and three patients from group-1,-2, and -3, respectively. LIMITATIONS Small number of patients in each group remains the major limitation of the study. Whether or not these results can be extrapolated with patch test results from other similar patch test kits available across countries also needs confirmation. CONCLUSION The patch test allergens can be used beyond labeled expiry dates but needs confirmation by a few large studies and using other available patch test kits. This is important as the relevance of patch test results for individual allergen in this scenario may remain debatable requiring careful interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram K Mahajan
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Pushpinder Singh Chauhan
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Karaninder Singh Mehta
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Anuj Sharma
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Bhumika Chowdhary
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Niharika Dhattarwal
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Hitender Sharma
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Monika Chandel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Yog Raj Verma
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), Himachal Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
The European Baseline Series. Contact Dermatitis 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-36335-2_64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
8
|
Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A, Becker D, Brasch J, Breuer K, Dickel H, Drexler H, Elsner P, Geier J, John SM, Kreft B, Köllner A, Merk H, Ott H, Pleschka S, Portisch M, Spornraft-Ragaller P, Weisshaar E, Werfel T, Worm M, Schnuch A, Uter W. S3 guidelines: Epicutaneous patch testing with contact allergens and drugs - Short version, Part 1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2020; 17:1076-1093. [PMID: 31631537 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Epicutaneous patch testing is the diagnostic standard for the detection of allergic contact dermatitis. The present guidelines are aimed at residents and board-certified physicians in the fields of dermatology and allergology as well as other medical specialties involved in establishing the indication for patch testing and its execution in patients with contact dermatitis and other forms of delayed-type hypersensitivity. The target audience also includes other health care providers and insurance funds. Based on a systematic literature search and a formal consensus process (S3), the guidelines were developed by dermatologists in collaboration with pediatricians, occupational medicine physicians, nursing staff as well as patient representatives. The systematic methodological approach and appraisal of evidence upon which the recommendations are based are outlined in a separate method report that also contains evidence tables. The guidelines address general aspects of patch testing as well as medicolegal issues. The recommendations given relate to topics such as the indication for patch testing, informed patient consent, as well as the choice of test substances, test chambers and test site, duration of exposure, reading times and interpretation of test reactions. Furthermore, recommendations are provided with respect to endogenous and exogenous factors, specific patient groups (children, pregnant women, immunosuppressed individuals) as well as possible risks and adverse events associated with patch testing using contact allergens. Note: This publication is part 1 of the short version of the S3 guidelines for "Epicutaneous patch testing using contact allergens and drugs" (registry no. 013 - 018; date: March 20, 2019; valid until December 31, 2021). Part 2 of the short version will be published in the next issue. The long version of these guidelines can be accessed at www.awmf.org. The method report is available as online publication (https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/013-018.html) and contains the evidence tables in its appendix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mahler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.,Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
| | - Alexander Nast
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, Division of Evidence-based Medicine (dEBM), Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Dresden Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Detlef Becker
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jochen Brasch
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, University Medical Center, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kristine Breuer
- Dermatology Practice (Dermatologie Reinbek), Reinbek, Germany
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hans Drexler
- Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Friedrich--Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Elsner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Johannes Geier
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Swen Malte John
- Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Hans Merk
- Professor of Dermatology and Allergology, Former Chairman of the Department of Dermatology, RWTH University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | - Silvia Pleschka
- German Allergy and Asthma Foundation (Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund e.V.), Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Maria Portisch
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Petra Spornraft-Ragaller
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Dresden Technical University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Division of Occupational Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, , Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology und Allergology, Charité - UniversityMedicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), Institute at the University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology (IMBE), Medical Faculty, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The European Baseline Series. Contact Dermatitis 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_64-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
10
|
Mahler V, Nast A, Bauer A, Becker D, Brasch J, Breuer K, Dickel H, Drexler H, Elsner P, Geier J, John SM, Kreft B, Köllner A, Merk H, Ott H, Pleschka S, Portisch M, Spornraft‐Ragaller P, Weisshaar E, Werfel T, Worm M, Schnuch A, Uter W. S3‐Leitlinie: Durchführung des Epikutantests mit Kontaktallergenen und Arzneimitteln – Kurzfassung Teil 1. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2019; 17:1075-1093. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13956_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Mahler
- Hautklinik Universitätsklinikum ErlangenFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Langen
| | - Alexander Nast
- Division of Evidence‐Based Medicine (dEBM)Klinik für DermatologieVenerologie und AllergologieCharité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden Dresden
| | | | - Jochen Brasch
- Klinik für DermatologieVenerologie und AllergologieUniversitätsklinikum Schleswig‐Holstein Kiel
| | | | - Heinrich Dickel
- Klinik für DermatologieVenerologie und AllergologieSt. Josef‐Hospital Ruhr‐Universität Bochum Bochum
| | - Hans Drexler
- Institut für Arbeits‐, Sozial‐ und Umweltmedizin der Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
| | - Peter Elsner
- Klinik für HautkrankheitenUniversitätsklinikum Jena Jena
| | - Johannes Geier
- Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK) e.V. an der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen
| | - Swen Malte John
- Institut für interdisziplinäre Dermatologische Prävention und Rehabilitation (iDerm) an der Universität Osnabrück Osnabrück
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und VenerologieUniversitätsklinikum Halle (Saale) Halle
| | | | - Hans Merk
- Univ.‐Professor für Dermatologie & AllergologieDirektor (em.) der Hautklinik – RWTH Aachen University Aachen
| | - Hagen Ott
- Hannoversche Kinderheilanstalt (HKA): Kinder‐ und Jugendkrankenhaus auf der Bult Hannover
| | | | - Maria Portisch
- Hautklinik Universitätsklinikum ErlangenFriedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
| | - Petra Spornraft‐Ragaller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav CarusTechnische Universität Dresden Dresden
| | - Elke Weisshaar
- Berufsdermatologie, Hautklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Heidelberg
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und VenerologieMedizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover
| | - Margitta Worm
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin
| | - Axel Schnuch
- Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK) e.V. an der Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Göttingen
| | - Wolfgang Uter
- Institut für Medizininformatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (IMBE)Medizinische Fakultät der Friedrich‐Alexander‐Universität Erlangen‐Nürnberg Erlangen
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Parsi K, Roberts S, Kang M, Benson S, Baker L, Berman I, Bester LJ, Connor DE, Dinnen P, Grace J, Stirling A, Ibrahim N, Lekich C, Lim A, Matar L, Nadkarni S, Paraskevas P, Rogan C, Thibault PK, Thibault S, van Rij A, Yang A. Cyanoacrylate closure for peripheral veins: Consensus document of the Australasian College of Phlebology. Phlebology 2019; 35:153-175. [PMID: 31368408 DOI: 10.1177/0268355519864755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Cyanoacrylates are fast-acting adhesives used in procedural medicine including closure of superficial wounds, embolization of truncal vessels pre-operatively, vascular anomalies, visceral false aneurysms, endoleaks, gastrointestinal varices and gastrointestinal bleeding. More recently, catheter-directed cyanoacrylate adhesive closure was introduced as an alternative to endovenous thermal ablation (ETA) to occlude superficial veins of the lower limbs. Objectives To formulate policies for the safe and effective delivery of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure procedures in Australasia, based on current experience and evidence. Methods A panel of phlebologists including vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, dermatologists and research scientists systematically reviewed the available data on cyanoacrylate products used in medicine and shared personal experience with the procedure. The reviewed material included bibliographic and biomedical data, material safety data sheets and data requested and received from manufacturers. Results and recommendations: Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure appears to be an effective treatment for saphenous reflux with occlusion rates at 36 months of 90–95%. We recommend a maximum dose of 10 mL of cyanoacrylate per treatment session. Serious complications are rare, but significant. Hypersensitivity to acrylates is reported in 2.4% of the population and is an important absolute contraindication to cyanoacrylate adhesive closure. 1 Post-procedural inflammatory reactions, including hypersensitivity-type phlebitis, occur in 10–20% of patients. 2 In the long term, cyanoacrylate adhesive closure results in foreign-body granuloma formation within 2–12 months of the procedure. We recommend against the use of cyanoacrylate adhesive closure in patients with uncontrolled inflammatory, autoimmune or granulomatous disorders (e.g. sarcoidosis). Caution should be exercised in patients with significant active systemic disease or infection and alternative therapies such as thermal ablation and foam sclerotherapy should be considered. Conclusions Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure appears to be an effective endovenous procedure, with short-term closure rates comparable to ETA and therefore greater efficacy than traditional surgery for treating superficial veins of the lower limbs. Ongoing data collection is required to establish the long-term safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurosh Parsi
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales.,Dermatology, Phlebology and Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Mina Kang
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales.,Dermatology, Phlebology and Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Luke Baker
- Department of Medical Imaging, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - David E Connor
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales.,Dermatology, Phlebology and Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul Dinnen
- Gold Coast Vascular Centre, Gold Coast, Australia
| | | | | | - Nabeel Ibrahim
- Sydney Centre for Venous Disease, Sydney, Australia.,Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Adrian Lim
- Department of Dermatology, The Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Christopher Rogan
- Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medical Imaging, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul K Thibault
- Central Vein and Cosmetic Medical Centre, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Simon Thibault
- Central Vein and Cosmetic Medical Centre, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Andre van Rij
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Anes Yang
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales.,Dermatology, Phlebology and Fluid Mechanics Laboratory, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stingeni L, Bianchi L, Hansel K, Corazza M, Gallo R, Guarneri F, Patruno C, Rigano L, Romita P, Pigatto PD, Calzavara-Pinton P. Italian Guidelines in Patch Testing - adapted from the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD). GIORN ITAL DERMAT V 2019; 154:227-253. [DOI: 10.23736/s0392-0488.19.06301-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
13
|
Patch Testing: Technical Details and Interpretation. Contact Dermatitis 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-72451-5_62-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
14
|
|
15
|
Jou PC, Siegel PD, Warshaw EM. Vapor Pressure and Predicted Stability of American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergens. Dermatitis 2018; 27:193-201. [PMID: 27427821 DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate patch testing is reliant on proper preparation of patch test allergens. The stability of patch test allergens is dependent on several factors including vapor pressure (VP). OBJECTIVE This investigation reviews the VP of American Contact Dermatitis Society Core Allergens and compares stability predictions based on VP with those established through clinical testing. METHODS Standard references were accessed for determining VP in millimeters of mercury and associated temperature in degrees celsius. If multiple values were listed, VP at temperatures that most approximate indoor storage conditions (20°C and 25°C) were chosen. For mixes, the individual component with the highest VP was chosen as the overall VP, assuming that the most volatile substance would evaporate first. Antigens were grouped into low (≤0.001 mm Hg), moderate (<1 to >0.001 mm Hg), and high (≥1 mm Hg) volatility using arbitrary cutoff values. CONCLUSIONS This review is consistent with previously reported data on formaldehyde, acrylates, and fragrance material instability. Given lack of testing data, VP can be useful in predicting patch test compound stability. Measures such as air-tight multidose reagent containers, sealed single-application dispensers, preparation of patches immediately before application, and storage at lower temperatures may remedy some of these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C Jou
- From the *Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota; †Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN; and ‡Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Mercader-García P, Silvestre-Salvador JF. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by (meth)acrylates in long-lasting nail polish - are we facing a new epidemic in the beauty industry? Contact Dermatitis 2017; 77:360-366. [PMID: 28656588 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Revised: 04/02/2017] [Accepted: 04/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by (meth)acrylates has been described both in occupational and in non-occupational settings. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical patterns, the most frequent allergens and the prognosis in patients sensitized to (meth)acrylates in long-lasting nail polish. METHODS The files of patients with ACD caused by (meth)acrylates in long-lasting nail polish diagnosed between January 2013 and June 2016 in four dermatology departments in Spain were reviewed. Patients were followed up by telephone interview. RESULTS Overall, 2353 patients were patch tested. Forty-three (1.82%) were diagnosed with ACD caused by (meth)acrylates in long-lasting nail polish during that period; all were female, and all had hand dermatitis. Patients were mostly less than 40 years old (72.1%), non-atopic (95.4%) and had an occupational cause of their dermatitis (93%), which developed ∼10.1 months after they had started to use this technique. The most frequent positive allergens were: 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate. Eight of the 22 interviewed patients were able to improve their working technique and used 4H® protective material (fingerstalls/gloves). CONCLUSIONS Long-lasting nail polishes have become widespread, and it is a matter of concern that we may be facing a new epidemic of ACD caused by these. Policies regulating their use are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria-Antonia Pastor-Nieto
- Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Guadalajara, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain.,Medicine and Medical Specialties Department, Alcalá de Henares University, 28801, Alcalá de Henares, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Johnston G, Exton L, Mohd Mustapa M, Slack J, Coulson I, English J, Bourke J, McHenry P, Gibbon K, Buckley D, Leslie T, Mallon E, Wakelin S, Ungureanu S, Hunasehally R, Cork M, Natkunarajah J, Worsnop F, Chiang N, Donnelly J, Saunders C, Brain A, Exton LS. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for the management of contact dermatitis 2017. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176:317-329. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G.A. Johnston
- Department of Dermatology University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Infirmary Square Leicester LE1 5WW U.K
| | - L.S. Exton
- British Association of Dermatologists Willan House, 4 Fitzroy Square London W1T 5HQ U.K
| | - M.F. Mohd Mustapa
- British Association of Dermatologists Willan House, 4 Fitzroy Square London W1T 5HQ U.K
| | - J.A. Slack
- Department of Dermatology University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Infirmary Square Leicester LE1 5WW U.K
| | - I.H. Coulson
- Department of Dermatology Burnley General Hospital Casterton Avenue Burnley BB10 2PQ U.K
| | | | - J.F. Bourke
- Department of Dermatology South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital Old Blackrock Road Cork City Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bruze M. Thoughts on how to improve the quality of multicentre patch test studies. Contact Dermatitis 2016; 74:168-74. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; S-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, Cannavó A, Giménez-Arnau A, Gonçalo M, Goossens A, John SM, Lidén C, Lindberg M, Mahler V, Matura M, Rustemeyer T, Serup J, Spiewak R, Thyssen JP, Vigan M, White IR, Wilkinson M, Uter W. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis 2015; 73:195-221. [PMID: 26179009 DOI: 10.1111/cod.12432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 932] [Impact Index Per Article: 103.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Revised: 04/29/2015] [Accepted: 05/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The present guideline summarizes all aspects of patch testing for the diagnosis of contact allergy in patients suspected of suffering, or having been suffering, from allergic contact dermatitis or other delayed-type hypersensitivity skin and mucosal conditions. Sections with brief descriptions and discussions of different pertinent topics are followed by a highlighted short practical recommendation. Topics comprise, after an introduction with important definitions, materials, technique, modifications of epicutaneous testing, individual factors influencing the patch test outcome or necessitating special considerations, children, patients with occupational contact dermatitis and drug eruptions as special groups, patch testing of materials brought in by the patient, adverse effects of patch testing, and the final evaluation and patient counselling based on this judgement. Finally, short reference is made to aspects of (continuing) medical education and to electronic collection of data for epidemiological surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne D Johansen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Kristiina Aalto-Korte
- Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tove Agner
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Klaus E Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Andreas Bircher
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, SE-20502 Malmö, Sweden
| | - Alicia Cannavó
- Hospital Municipal de Vicente López 'Profesor Bernard Houssay', Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ana Giménez-Arnau
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margarida Gonçalo
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - An Goossens
- Contact Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital K. U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Swen M John
- Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine, Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, D-49069 Osnabrueck, Germany
| | - Carola Lidén
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Lindberg
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Örebro, SE-70185 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Vera Mahler
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mihály Matura
- Unit of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Centre for Occupational and Environmental Medicine, SLSO, SE-11365 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Thomas Rustemeyer
- Department of Dermatology, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jørgen Serup
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Radoslaw Spiewak
- Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-688 Krakow, Poland
| | - Jacob P Thyssen
- Department of Dermato-Allergology, National Allergy Research Centre, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Martine Vigan
- Department of Dermatology, CHRU Besançon, 25030 Besançon Cedex, France
| | - Ian R White
- Department of Cutaneous Allergy, St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | | | - Wolfgang Uter
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mowitz M, Svedman C, Zimerson E, Bruze M. Fragrance patch tests prepared in advance may give false-negative reactions. Contact Dermatitis 2014; 71:289-94. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2014] [Revised: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 08/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Cecilia Svedman
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Erik Zimerson
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| | - Magnus Bruze
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology; Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; SE-205 02 Malmö Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rodrigues Barata AR, Haroun-Díaz E, Conde-Salazar Gómez L. Can expired TRUE Test® be used for patch testing? Contact Dermatitis 2014; 70:381-2. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2013] [Revised: 09/29/2013] [Accepted: 10/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Rodrigues Barata
- Occupational Dermatology Department, Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Ciudad Universitaria, U. Complutense Madrid; 28040 Madrid Spain
| | | | - Luis Conde-Salazar Gómez
- Occupational Dermatology Department, Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Ciudad Universitaria, U. Complutense Madrid; 28040 Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (lyral) in patch test preparations under varied storage conditions. Dermatitis 2014; 24:246-8. [PMID: 24030363 DOI: 10.1097/der.0b013e318281d094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The common practice of preparing patch tests in advance has recently been called into question by researchers. It has been established that fragrance compounds are volatile and their testing efficacy may be affected by storage conditions and preparation. Allergens in fragrance mix I rapidly decrease in concentration after preapplication to test chambers. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the volatility of hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) in petrolatum when stored in test chambers and to explore the correlation between vapor pressure and allergen loss in petrolatum during preparation and storage. METHODS Standardized HICC in petrolatum was prepared and stored in IQ Chambers and Finn Chambers with covers at 5°C, 25°C, and 35°C, and concentration was analyzed at intervals for up to 9 days using gel permeation chromatography. RESULTS Changes in HICC concentrations were not statistically significant at 8 hours at 5°C, 25°C, and 35°C. After 9 days, HICC concentrations were found to fall approximately 30% when stored at 35°C, 10% at 25°C, and less than 5% at 5°C. There was no significant difference between IQ and Finn chambers. CONCLUSIONS Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde concentrations are more stable in petrolatum than many other studied fragrance allergens, but HICC is still at risk for decreasing concentration when exposed to ambient air or heat for prolonged periods.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Patch testing is widely used in evaluating suspected contact dermatitis. One major component of a quality patch test result is a dependable, predictable allergen supply. The allergen needs to be present at a sufficient concentration to elicit a reaction in an allergic patient. To better understand the stability of patch-test allergens, we completed a systematic review of the literature. We found that there is variability in stability among patch-test allergens and that although a few have been shown to be stable, many degrade when in storage. In most cases, expiration dates should be honored. In addition, allergen panels should be prepared as close to the time of patch test application as is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Marie Joy
- From the Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mose KF, Andersen KE, Christensen LP. Investigation of the homogeneity of methacrylate allergens in commercially available patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 2013; 69:239-44. [DOI: 10.1111/cod.12088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2013] [Revised: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 03/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Fredløv Mose
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; DK-5000; Odense C; Denmark
| | - Klaus Ejner Andersen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; DK-5000; Odense C; Denmark
| | - Lars Porskjaer Christensen
- Institute of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Technology, University of Southern Denmark; DK-5230; Odense M; Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mowitz M, Zimerson E, Svedman C, Bruze M. Stability of fragrance patch test preparations applied in test chambers. Br J Dermatol 2013; 167:822-7. [PMID: 22803625 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11143.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Petrolatum patch test preparations are for practical reasons often applied in test chambers in advance, several hours or even days before the patient is tested. As many fragrance compounds are volatile it may be suspected that petrolatum preparations applied in test chambers are not stable over time. OBJECTIVES To investigate the stability of petrolatum preparations of the seven chemically defined components in the fragrance mix (FM I) when stored in test chambers. METHODS Samples of petrolatum preparations applied in test chambers stored at room temperature and in a refrigerator for between 4 and 144 h were analysed using liquid chromatographic methods. RESULTS The concentration decreased by ≥ 20% within 8 h in four of seven preparations stored in Finn chambers at room temperature. When stored in a refrigerator only the preparation of cinnamal had decreased by ≥ 20% within 24 h. The stability of preparations of cinnamal stored in IQ chambers with a plastic cover was slightly better, but like the preparations applied in Finn chambers, the concentration decreased by ≥ 20% within 4 h at room temperature and within 24 h in a refrigerator. Cinnamal and cinnamyl alcohol were found to be more stable when analysed as ingredients in FM I compared with when analysed in individual preparations. CONCLUSIONS Within a couple of hours several fragrance allergens evaporate from test chambers to an extent that may affect the outcome of the patch test. Application to the test chambers should be performed as close to the patch test occasion as possible and storage in a refrigerator is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mowitz
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, SE-20502 Malmö, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Gamboni SE, Simmons I, Palmer A, Nixon RL. Allergic contact dermatitis to indium in jewellery: diagnosis made possible through the use of the Contact Allergen Bank Australia. Australas J Dermatol 2013; 54:139-40. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00926.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2012] [Accepted: 05/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Gamboni
- Occupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre; Skin and Cancer Foundation; Melbourne; Victoria; Australia
| | - Ivan Simmons
- Ashford Dermatology & Phototherapy Clinic; Adelaide; South Australia; Australia
| | - Amanda Palmer
- Occupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre; Skin and Cancer Foundation; Melbourne; Victoria; Australia
| | - Rosemary L Nixon
- Occupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre; Skin and Cancer Foundation; Melbourne; Victoria; Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Buckley D. Advance preparation of some patch test series should be avoided. Br J Dermatol 2012; 167:708-9. [DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|