Flow cytometry of lesional skin enhances the evaluation of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas

Analysis of clonality in cutaneous B-cell lymphoma and B-cell pseudolymphoma using skin flow cytometry: Comparison of immunophenotyping and gene rearrangement studies

To identify clonal neoplastic cells in skin affected by B-cell lymphoma using skin flow cytometry (FCM) techniques, we investigated light-chain restriction using skin FCM with clonality assessed by polymerase chain reaction and light-chain restriction by in situ hybridization (ISH). We retrospectively analyzed 16 cases of B-cell lymphoma with cutaneous involvement: primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type (pcDLBCL-LT) (n = 7), DLBCL-not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS) (n = 6), primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma (pcFCL) (n = 1), and follicular lymphoma (n = 2), as well as cutaneous B-cell pseudolymphoma (n = 9). Results of skin FCM light-chain restriction analyses were compared with immunoglobulin H (IgH) gene rearrangement and κ/λ ISH findings. Skin FCM detected light-chain restriction in 11 of 14 B-cell lymphoma patients but none of the B-cell pseudolymphoma patients. The sensitivity of skin FCM for distinguishing B-cell lymphoma and B-cell pseudolymphoma was 79%, and the specificity was 100%. Eleven of 13 B-cell lymphoma patients exhibited gene rearrangement (sensitivity 85%), whereas six of seven pseudolymphoma patients were negative (specificity 86%). ISH was positive in three of 16 B-cell lymphoma cases (sensitivity 19%) but none of the B-cell pseudolymphoma cases (specificity 100%). ISH sensitivity was 29% for pcDLBCL-LT, 17% for DLBCL-NOS, and 0% for pcFCL and follicular lymphoma. Skin FCM therefore appears to be more sensitive than ISH in detecting light-chain restriction in DLBCL and follicular lymphoma, and as sensitive as IgH gene rearrangement analysis in detecting clonality. Skin FCM is thus a promising diagnostic tool for identifying monoclonal neoplastic B-cell populations.

Kappa and lambda immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in the evaluation of atypical cutaneous lymphoid infiltrates

BACKGROUND

Atypical cutaneous lymphoid infiltrates are challenging lesions in dermatopathology. We present a summary of the literature regarding kappa and lambda immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) in the evaluation of atypical cutaneous or mucosal lymphoid infiltrates.

METHODS

Relevant articles from 1967 to 2018 in the English language were identified and summarized. In the absence of larger studies, case series of n ≥ 3 were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-three articles assessing kappa and lambda IHC and/or ISH were identified. Most focused on marginal zone lymphomas. Other lymphomas included follicle center lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma, plasmablastic lymphoma, multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, skin changes (POEMS). Non-neoplastic lesions included reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, cutaneous plasmacytosis, connective tissue disease, IgG4-related disease, acrodermatitis chronic atrophicans, Zoon balanitis, dermatitides, and infiltrates around epithelial dysplasias/neoplasias.

CONCLUSION

Kappa and lambda IHC and ISH are useful tools in the evaluation of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell neoplasms. The literature supports that the detection of light-chain restriction by IHC and ISH is one of the most useful findings in the differential diagnosis of reactive lymphoid hyperplasia vs B-cell lymphoma with plasmacytic differentiation.

Primary Cutaneous Follicle Center Lymphoma

CONTEXT.—

Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma is a low-grade B-cell lymphoma that is limited to the skin at diagnosis. It has a differential diagnosis that includes systemic/nodal follicular lymphoma secondarily involving the skin; primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma leg type; reactive lymphoid hyperplasia; and primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features of primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma; its differential diagnosis; and the evidence that supports use of immunohistochemistry and genetic testing in the diagnosis and prognosis of this entity.

DATA SOURCES.—

Pertinent literature regarding cutaneous B-cell lymphomas is summarized and University of Michigan cases are used to highlight characteristics of primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma is a low-grade B-cell lymphoma with distinctive features, although some cases may have elements that overlap with other lymphomas, complicating interpretation.

Cutaneous primary B-cell lymphomas: from diagnosis to treatment

Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of mature B-cells neoplasms with tropism for the skin, whose biology and clinical course differ significantly from the equivalent nodal lymphomas. The most indolent forms comprise the primary cutaneous marginal zone and follicle center B-cell lymphomas that despite the excellent prognosis have cutaneous recurrences very commonly. The most aggressive forms include the primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphomas, consisting in two major groups: the leg type, with poor prognosis, and others, the latter representing a heterogeneous group of lymphomas from which specific entities are supposed to be individualized over time, such as intravascular large B-cell lymphomas. Treatment may include surgical excision, radiotherapy, antibiotics, corticosteroids, interferon, monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy, depending on the type of lymphoma and on the type and location of the skin lesions. In subtypes with good prognosis is contraindicated overtreatment and in those associated with a worse prognosis the recommended therapy relies on CHOP-like regimens associated with rituximab, assisted or not with local radiotherapy. We review the primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas, remembering the diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, classification, and prognostic factors and presenting the available therapies.

Clonality assessment of cutaneous B-cell lymphoid proliferations: a comparison of flow cytometry immunophenotyping, molecular studies, and immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and review of the literature

Cutaneous lymphoid infiltrates are diagnostically challenging. Although ancillary techniques to assess clonality can help distinguish between reactive lymphoid hyperplasia and lymphoma, one of the most widely used techniques in hematopathology, flow cytometry immunophenotyping (FCI), has not been routinely applied to skin specimens. We performed FCI on 73 skin specimens from 67 patients clinically suspected of having a cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (CBCL) and compared the results with those obtained from immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene molecular studies (58 cases, primarily by polymerase chain reaction) and either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization to evaluate for light chain restriction (22 and 2 cases, respectively). Sufficient quantity of CD45 (leukocyte common antigen)-positive cells and staining quality were achieved in 88% of cases by FCI, and clonality was detected in 68% of CBCLs versus molecular studies showing sufficient DNA quality in 74% and only 39% clonality detection, and interpretable/contributory IHC results in 84% of cases with 55% clonality detection. Clonality was documented more frequently in secondary rather than primary CBCLs by all 3 techniques. Therefore, FCI is feasible and appears to be more reliable than molecular studies or IHC/in situ hybridization for detecting clonality in CBCLs and can provide additional prognostically and therapeutically relevant information. The exception is cases with plasmacytic differentiation such as marginal zone lymphoma for which IHC might be a superior tool. We have also shown that a large subset of primary cutaneous follicle center lymphomas express CD10 and/or BCL2 by FCI. Recent advances in FCI beg the question of applicability to cutaneous T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas.