Etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and high-dose betamethasone (EACB) as outpatient salvage therapy for refractory multiple myeloma

Patterns of survival in multiple myeloma: a population-based study of patients diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003

PURPOSE

To define patterns of survival among all multiple myeloma (MM) patients diagnosed in Sweden during a 30-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 14,381 MM patients (7,643 males; 6,738 females) were diagnosed in Sweden from 1973 to 2003 (median age, 69.9 years; range 19 to 101 years). Patients were categorized into six age categories and four calendar periods (1973 to 1979, 1980 to 1986, 1987 to 1993, and 1994 to 2003). We computed relative survival ratios (RSRs) as measures of patient survival.

RESULTS

One-year survival improved (P < .001) over time in all age groups and RSRs were 0.73, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.82 for the four calendar periods; however, improvement in 5-year (P < .001) and 10-year (P < .001) RSR was restricted to patients younger than 70 years and younger than 60 years, respectively. For the first time, in analyses restricted to MM patients diagnosed at age younger than 60 years, we found a 29% (P < .001) reduced 10-year mortality in the last calendar period (1994 to 2003) compared with the preceding calendar period (1987 to 1993). Females with MM had a 3% (P = .024) lower excess mortality than males.

CONCLUSION

One-year MM survival has increased for all age groups during the last decades; 5-year and 10-year MM survival has increased in younger patients (younger than 60 to 70 years). High-dose melphalan with subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, thalidomide, and a continuous improvement in supportive care measures are probably the most important factors contributing to this finding. New effective agents with a more favorable toxicity profile are needed to improve survival further, particularly in the elderly.

Phase II study of CLAD (cyclophosphamide, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone) in patients with advanced multiple myeloma and historical comparison to CAD (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and dexamethasone)

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CLAD). In this prospective open-label phase II study, 60 patients with advanced multiple myeloma (MM) received three weekly cycles of CLAD, consisting of cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 i.v. d1-4, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 i.v. d1 and dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. d1-4 for a maximum of six cycles in absence of disease progression. Efficacy and toxicity was compared to our immediate historical cohort of 46 patients treated with cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone and conventional doxorubicin (CAD). A total of 239 cycles of CLAD and 209 cycles of CAD, respectively, were given. The objective response rate was 71% (CLAD) and 74% (CAD). Non-cumulative hematological toxicity was predominant in both regimens. It was found that CLAD is an active and well-tolerated treatment regimen for MM. Response rate is comparable to other anthracycline containing regimens like CAD with an advantage in hematological toxicity and lower infectious complications, and a presumed advantage of lower cardiotoxicity.

Cyclophosphamide, etoposide, vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone (CEVAD) regimen in refractory multiple myeloma: an International Oncology Study Group (IOSG) phase II protocol

A 4- day continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion of vincristine and doxorubicin with high-dose dexamethasone (VAD) regimen is a standard refractory multiple myeloma (MM) regimen. A Phase II study of a CEVAD regimen, i.e., VAD plus etoposide administered as a 96-hr continuous infusion, was carried out with IV bolus cyclophosphamide. Thirty-six patients were treated on study and received a total of 114 cycles of CEVAD: median 2 cycles (range 1-8). No patient achieved a CR. The overall rate of PR was 15/36 (42%). Patients achieved maximal response after a median of 4 (range 3-6) courses. PR rates were 40% (4/10) in patients with primary refractory disease, 48% (11/23) in patients with secondary refractory disease, 31% (6/19) in patients who had failed previous VAD therapy, and 50% (7/14) in patients receiving 2nd or subsequent relapse therapy. Three patients died during their initial cycle of therapy from rapidly progressive disease and sepsis. Overall median survival was 24 weeks with a 1-year survival of 33.3% ¿95% confidence interval of 20-46%¿. Myelosuppression was the most frequent adverse event with NCI grade 2 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia in 15% of first cycles, grade 3 in 20%, and grade 4 in 65%. Two-thirds of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 sepsis. In 15% of septic episodes positive blood cultures were obtained. Overt cardiotoxicity was seen in two patients. CEVAD as used in this study was not more effective than VAD in terms of overall response rate or survival.

High dose etoposide-based myeloablative therapy followed by autologous blood progenitor cell rescue in the treatment of multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have demonstrated that high dose chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, with autologous marrow and/or peripheral blood progenitor cell support can result in improved overall and complete response rates in patients with multiple myeloma, and a minority of patients become long term survivors. Based on their favorable experience with high dose etoposide-based regimens in patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, the authors explored the use of these regimens prior to autologous progenitor cell rescue in patients with multiple myeloma.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients (median age, 49 years; range, 38-65) with multiple myeloma who were responsive to standard chemotherapy were enrolled in this study. Blood progenitor cells were collected after treatment with cyclophosphamide at a dose of 4 g/m2 followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at a dose of approximately 10 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously, and the collection continued daily until the target number of mononuclear cells had been obtained. The preparative regimen consisted of fractionated total body irradiation (FTBI) of 1200 centigray in 10 fractions on Day -8 to Day -5, etoposide 60 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) on Day -4, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/kg i.v. on Day -2. Day 0 was the day of progenitor cell infusion. Patients who were older than 50 years or had received prior radiation therapy that precluded FTBI received carmustine 15 mg/kg i.v. or lomustine 15 mg/kg orally on Day -6 rather than FTBI. G-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) was begun the day after progenitor cell infusion and continued until engraftment.

RESULTS

Recovery of granulocytes to 500/microL occurred at a median of 9 days (range, 7-13), and platelet recovery to 20,000/microL occurred without transfusion at 9 days (range, 6-88) after progenitor cell infusion. Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. Eleven patients (34%) achieved a complete remission, 17 (53%) achieved a partial remission, and 4 (13%) had stable disease following high dose therapy and progenitor cell rescue. The actuarial event free survival at 4 years for the entire group was 26%, and overall survival was 36%. The median time to progression of disease was 13 months (range, 2-42). Two patients died of regimen-related toxicity, one of venoocclusive disease of the liver and the other of multiorgan failure. In a multivariate analysis, only the extent of prior therapy was a significant prognostic factor for event free survival, and no significant factors were identified for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose etoposide-based myeloablative regimens followed by autologous blood progenitor cell rescue are relatively well tolerated and effective for the treatment of multiple myeloma, and a minority of patients become long term disease free survivors.

Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer

A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'accelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1300 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherapy, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 micrograms kg-1 from day 5 to day 11 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100, D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedule planned by the protocol and no 'dose-limiting toxicity' (DLT) was seen. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of five patients had a DLT consisting of 'granulocytopenic fever' (GCPF). Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of 'fever of unknown origin' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proceeded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DLT consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciprofloxacin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of five patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leucopenia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this setting deserves to be investigated further.

Myeloma during a decade: clinical experience in a single centre

One hundred and fifty-six patients with multiple myeloma were treated over a period of 12 years at St. Bartholomew's Hospital. The progress of the disease was affected in 96/156 patients (61%). Response was defined as achieving a plateau of M component. A partial or complete response was seen in 68/120 patients treated conventionally (56.5%), and in 28/36 patients treated with high-dose therapy (77.7%). The median survival of the group as a whole was 20 months, with a 2-year survival of just over 40%. In the 36 patients treated with high-dose therapy, median survival was 6 years, and in a small group who have had maintenance Interferon therapy, the median has not yet been reached. In a univariate analysis, age, intensity of therapy, haemoglobin and creatinine levels were significant, but multivariate analysis showed that only age and intensity of therapy were independent predictors for survival. The outlook for relapsed patients who showed progression of disease remains poor, but palliation was best achieved by steroid and Interferon in combination. Patients who achieve complete responses and are maintained on Interferon appear to be doing better both in terms of freedom from symptoms and in survival, and methods to enable an elderly population to tolerate this form of therapy need to be explored.