Osteocalcin is not a marker of progress in multiple myeloma

Diagnostic and prognostic use of bone turnover markers

The use of bone turnover markers in oncology includes monitoring of anticancer treatment in patients with malignant disease metastatic to the bones (therapeutic monitoring), predicting the risk of bone relapse in patients with a first diagnosis of potentially curative, early-stage malignant tumors (prognostic use), and making an early diagnosis of (microscopic) malignant bone disease in patients with a known malignant tumor to start early bone-targeted treatment and avoid skeletal-related events (diagnostic use). Concerning prognostic use, there is limited evidence for bone turnover markers to predict the occurrence of metachronous bone metastases in patients with early-stage malignant tumors, with serum PINP (N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type 1), ICTP (Carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen), bone sialoprotein (BSP), and tumor immunoexpression of BSP being the most promising candidates. Concerning diagnostic use, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatise (BSAP), PINP and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were repeatedly shown to be associated with synchronous bone metastases in patients with breast or lung cancer, but sensitivity of these markers was too low to suggest that they might be preferred over conventional bone scans for the diagnosis of bone metastases. A somewhat higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of bone metastases was found for urinary NTx (N-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen) and serum ICTP in solid tumor patients, serum TRAcP-5b (Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b) in patients with breast cancer and serum BSAP, PINP and OPG in prostate cancer patients. Both prognostic and diagnostic use of bone turnover markers are reviewed in this chapter.

The use of molecular markers of bone turnover in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are widely used in clinical practice. These indices have been shown to be associated with the occurrence, prognosis and therapeutic response of malignant bone lesions. For example, markers of bone resorption are often elevated in patients with established bone metastases and while this may point to a role of these markers in the diagnostic workup of cancer patients, the available evidence does not permit any final conclusions as to the accuracy and validity of the presently used markers in the early diagnosis of bone metastases. Many bone turnover markers appear to respond to antiresorptive and antineoplastic therapies, and recent evidence from prospective trials suggests that the aim of bisphosphonate therapy should be to normalize rates of bone remodelling to optimize therapeutic and prognostic outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether the use of bone markers in the routine clinical setting has any defined beneficial effects on overall outcome in cancer patients. Clearly, bone turnover markers have insufficient diagnostic or prognostic value to be used in isolation; however, the combination of these markers with other diagnostic techniques may improve clinical assessment of patients with bone-seeking cancers. This article reviews the available evidence (as of August 2007) on the clinical use of bone turnover markers in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease.

Clinical Utility of Biochemical Markers of Bone Metabolism for Improving the Management of Patients with Advanced Multiple Myeloma

Osteolytic bone lesions from advanced multiple myeloma (MM) result in significant skeletal morbidity. Therefore, biochemical markers of bone metabolism, such as the N-terminal and C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin, have been investigated as tools for evaluating the extent of bone disease, risk of skeletal morbidity, and response to antiresorptive treatment. Several studies have shown that the majority of biochemical markers of bone metabolism are increased in patients with MM with osteolytic bone lesions, thus reflecting changes in bone metabolism associated with tumor growth. There is also a growing body of evidence that markers of bone metabolism correlate with the risk of skeletal complications, disease progression, and death. In addition, bone markers could potentially be used as a tool for early diagnosis of bone lesions. The aim of this review is to improve our understanding of bone markers as a clinical tool for the management of malignant bone disease in patients with MM.

Clinical use of markers of bone turnover in metastatic bone disease

Bone metastases profoundly perturb normal bone remodeling. Biochemical markers of bone turnover have been shown to reflect these tumor-induced changes in bone remodeling and might therefore be useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with malignant bone disease. Most markers of bone turnover, particularly those of bone resorption, are elevated in patients with established bone metastases. While this might indicate a role for bone markers as diagnostic tools in cancer patients, the available evidence does not provide any final conclusions as to the accuracy and validity of the markers presently used in the early diagnosis of bone metastases. Markers of bone resorption respond promptly and profoundly to bisphosphonate and antineoplastic therapy, and this response is associated with a favorable clinical outcome. Most markers, however, have been more useful in groups of patients monitored in clinical studies than in studies of individuals. While this makes them a good tool for drug development, it remains unknown whether the use of bone markers in a routine clinical setting has any defined beneficial effects on overall outcome in cancer patients. In particular, no study has addressed the question of whether patients with bone metastases should be treated according to their rate of bone turnover and what the treatment goals are in this respect. While it is unlikely that bone-turnover markers have sufficient diagnostic or prognostic value when used in isolation, the combination of these markers with other diagnostic techniques might be the way forward to improve the clinical assessment of patients with cancers of the bone.

Clinical review 165: Markers of bone remodeling in metastatic bone disease

Many cancers have a strong propensity to spread to bone. The processes involved in cancer dissemination to bone are complex and variable, and the changes in bone metabolism, once bony metastases have occurred, are usually profound. This review surveys the usefulness of bone markers in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with malignant bone disease. In patients with established bone metastases, most markers of bone remodeling are abnormal compared with healthy controls or cancer patients without bone lesions. Although bone markers may have a potential as diagnostic tools in cancer patients, the available data do not allow final conclusions regarding the accuracy and validity of any of the presently used markers in the diagnosis of bone metastases. As regards monitoring of anticancer therapy, most markers of bone remodeling respond to active treatments. These indices therefore may have the potential to be used in the monitoring of antitumor therapies. However, most if not all of the available evidence on the use of bone markers in monitoring anticancer therapy is observational, and it remains unclear whether they have any beneficial effects on overall outcome. The same is true for their prognostic value, although evidence suggests that suppressed levels of bone formation or high rates of bone resorption are independent predictors of poor survival.

Evaluation of bone disease in multiple myeloma: a correlation between biochemical markers of bone metabolism and other clinical parameters in untreated multiple myeloma patients

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterised by an uncoupled bone formation/resorption process resulting in osteolysis. Osteocalcin (OC) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) are markers of osteoblastic activity, whereas pyridinoline products and the cross-linked aminoterminal of type I collagen (NTx) reflect bone destruction. In this study, these markers were studied in relation to bone disease severity and other clinical parameters of MM activity.

METHODS

Serum calcium, creatinine, CRP, beta 2 microglobulin (b(2)M), M-component, OC, BAP and free urine pyridoline (Pyd) and deoxypyridinoline (Dpd), free urine Dpd and NTx were determined in 38 newly diagnosed MM patients. X-ray examination defined the degree of bone involvement. Patients were classified according to the Durie-Salmon staging system.

RESULTS

NTx, free urine Pyd + Dpd, and free urine Dpd increased with increasing degree of bone involvement. NTx was significantly higher in stages II and III compared to stage I (mean values: 100.7, 163.5 and 208.3 nmol BCE/mM creat, respectively, p < 0.002). Free urine Pyd + Dpd correlated positively with b(2)M and CRP. OC was increased in stages I and II compared to III (p < 0.005) and was inversely correlated with NTx, free urine Pyd + Dpd, and free urine Dpd alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of bone turnover markers in MM provides significant information regarding disease progression and should be included in the evaluation of MM patients.