Enhancement of T cell activation by immobilized hu5C8 (anti-CD40L) monoclonal antibody

CTLA4Ig Improves Murine iTreg Induction via TGFβ and Suppressor Function In Vitro

Blockade of the CD28:CD80/86 costimulatory pathway has been shown to be potent in blocking T cell activation in vitro and in vivo. The costimulation blocker CTLA4Ig has been approved for the treatment of autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection. The therapeutic application of regulatory T cells (Tregs) has recently gained much attention for its potential of improving allograft survival. However, neither costimulation blockade with CTLA4Ig nor Treg therapy induces robust tolerance on its own. Combining CTLA4Ig with Treg therapy would be an attractive approach for minimizing immunosuppression or for possibly achieving tolerance. However, since the CD28 pathway is more complex than initially thought, the question arose whether blocking CD80/86 would inadvertently impact immunological tolerance by interfering with Treg generation and function. We therefore wanted to investigate the compatibility of CTLA4Ig with regulatory T cells by evaluating direct effects of CTLA4Ig on murine Treg generation and function in vitro. For generation of polyclonal-induced Tregs, we utilized an APC-free in vitro system and added titrated doses of CTLA4Ig at different time points. Phenotypical characterization by flow cytometry and functional characterization in suppressor assays did not reveal negative effects by CTLA4Ig. The costimulation blocker CTLA4Ig does not impair but rather improves murine iTreg generation and suppressor function in vitro.

Gene transfer of human CD40Ig does not prevent rejection in a non-human primate kidney allotransplantation model

BACKGROUND

Blockade of costimulation signaling required for immune response, such as CD40/CD40L and CD28/B7, is a reasonable strategy to prevent rejection and in defined combinations may allow donor specific tolerance. Indeed, in rodents, costimulation blockade with CD28/B7 antagonists or with CD40Ig was able to induce regulatory T cells and transplant tolerance whereas in primates, anti-CD40 antibodies, anti-CD40L antibodies or CTLA4Ig, used as monotherapy, significantly delayed graft rejection.

METHODS

Using an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector mediated gene transfer of a human CD40Ig fusion protein (hCD40Ig) in primates, we evaluated the capacity of this costimulation blockade molecule interfering with CD40/CD40L signaling in prolonging kidney transplants in cynomolgus monkeys.

RESULTS

This gene transfer strategy allowed for maintaining a plateau of hCD40Ig production within two months and avoided a high-scale production phase of this molecule. Although the hCD40Ig was able to bind efficiently to human and macaque CD40L and high (>200 μg/ml) transgene expression was obtained, no effect on graft survival was observed. In addition, there was no inhibition of humoral response to vaccination. In vitro, hCD40Ig strongly increased mixed lymphocyte reaction, and when compared to the anti-CD40L antibody h5C8, was not as potent to induce complement-dependent cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that CD40/CD40L blockade using a non-depleting CD40Ig fusion protein, a therapeutic strategy that showed efficacy in rodents, is not able to modulate the immune response in primates. These data highlight important biological differences between rodent and primate models to evaluate therapeutic strategies at the preclinical level.

Monoclonal antibody-induced cytokine-release syndrome

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used in anti-inflammatory and tumor therapy. Although effective, mAbs can cause a variety of adverse effects. An important toxicity seen with a few mAbs is cytokine-release syndrome (CRS). These mAbs include: alemtuzumab, muromonab-CD3, rituximab, tosituzumab, CP-870,893, LO-CD2a/BTI-322 and TGN1412. By contrast, over 30 mAbs used clinically are not associated with CRS. In this review, the clinical aspects of CRS, the mAbs associated with CRS, the cytokines involved and putative mechanisms mediating cytokine release will be discussed. This will be followed by a discussion of the poor predictive value of studies in animals and the prospects for creating in vitro screens. Finally, approaches to decreasing the probability of CRS, decreasing the severity or treating CRS, should it occur, will be described.