Severe congenital neutropenia and pegfilgrastim

Comparing the efficacy and side-effects of PDLASTA® (Pegfilgrastim) with PDGRASTIM® (Filgrastim) in breast cancer patients: a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of a single dose (Pegfilgrastim or PDL) or repeated six daily injections (Filgrastim or PDG) during chemotherapy courses in breast cancer patients in a non-inferiority clinical trial.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, 80 patients were recruited and allocated randomly to two equal arms. In one group, a single subcutaneous dose of PDL was injected the day after receiving the chemotherapy regimen in each cycle. The second arm received a subcutaneous injection of PDG for six consecutive days in each cycle of treatment. The side effects of GCF treatment and its effect on blood parameters were compared in each cycle and during eight cycles of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Hematologic parameters showed no significant differences in any of the treatment courses between the two study groups. The comparison of WBC (p = 0.527), Hgb (p = 0.075), Platelet (p = 0.819), Neutrophil (p = 0.575), Lymphocyte (p = 705) and ANC (p = 0.675) changes during the eight courses of treatment also revealed no statistically significant difference between the two study groups. Side effects including headache, injection site reaction and muscle pain had a lower frequency in patients receiving PDL drugs.

CONCLUSION

It seems that PDL is non-inferior in efficacy and also less toxic than PDG. Since PDL can be administered in a single dose and is also less costly, it can be regarded as a cost-effective drug for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IRCT20190504043465N1 , May 2019.

Neutropenia in primary immunodeficiency

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neutropenia is a feature of several primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDDs). Because of the diverse pathophysiologies of the PIDDs and the rarity of each disorder, data are often lacking, leading to the necessity of empiric treatment. Recent developments in the understanding of neutropenia in several of the PIDDs make a review of the data timely.

RECENT FINDINGS

The category of severe congenital neutropenia continues to expand. Mutations in G6PC3 have been identified as the cause of neutropenia in a minority of previously molecularly undefined cases. Recent advances have broadened our understanding of the pathophysiology and the clinical expression of this disorder. A possible function of the C16orf57 gene has been hypothesized that may explain the clinical overlap between Clerucuzio-type poikiloderma with neutropenia and other marrow diseases. Plerixafor has been shown to be a potentially useful treatment in the warts, hypogammaglobulinemia, infection, and myelokathexis syndrome. Investigations of patients with adenosine deaminase deficient severe combined immunodeficiency have identified neutropenia, and particularly susceptibility to myelotoxins, as a feature of this disorder. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is the treatment of choice for neutropenia in PIDD, whereas hematopoietic cell transplantation is the only curative option.

SUMMARY

The number of PIDDs associated with neutropenia has increased, as has our understanding of the range of phenotypes. Additional data and hypotheses have been generated helping to explain the diversity of presentations of neutropenia in PIDDs.

Congenital and acquired neutropenias consensus guidelines on therapy and follow-up in childhood from the Neutropenia Committee of the Marrow Failure Syndrome Group of the AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica)

The management of congenital and acquired neutropenias presents some differences according to the type of the disease. Treatment with recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is not standardized and scanty data are available on the best schedule to apply. The frequency and the type of longitudinal controls in patients affected with neutropenias are not usually discussed in the literature. The Neutropenia Committee of the Marrow Failure Syndrome Group (MFSG) of the Associazione Italiana di Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP) elaborated this document following design and methodology formerly approved by the AIEOP board. The panel of experts reviewed the literature on the topic and participated in a conference producing a document that includes recommendations on neutropenia treatment and timing of follow-up.

Pegfilgrastim in children with severe congenital neutropenia

Two pediatric patients affected by severe congenital neutropenia (SCN) were treated with 100 mcg/L/dose every 9-12 days within a pilot study (Observatory of the Italian Ministry of Health, Eudract Code 2005-003096-20) on the use of pegfilgrastim in patients with chronic neutropenia. Both children increased their absolute neutrophil count, reduced their infectious load, and improved their quality of life. Serum concentrations of G-CSF observed in pegfilgrastim mirrored those seen in filgrastim. These data suggest that pegfilgrastim may be beneficial in SCN patients with an exposure of hematopoietic cells to G-CSF similar to that on filgrastim.

Is pegfilgrastim safe and effective in congenital neutropenia? An analysis of the French Severe Chronic Neutropenia registry

AIMS

To examine the efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim in patients with congenital neutropenia (CN).

METHODS

Seventeen patients enrolled in the French Severe CN Register received pegfilgrastim.

RESULTS

Median age at pegfilgrastim introduction was 19.1 years (range 3.9-52.3 years). In 14 cases pegfilgrastim replaced GCSF (filgrastim or lenograstim), after a median of 6.9 years of GCSF therapy. The dose of pegfilgrastim was usually one full vial per injection (except in five children, who received 1/6 to 1/2 a vial), resulting in a dose of between 50 and 286 microg/kg. The pegfilgrastim schedule ranged from two injections every 7 days to one injection every 30 days, with treatment-free periods. The median interval between the first and last dose of pegfilgrastim was 0.8 years (0.01-4.1 years). The absolute neutrophil count tended to increase more strongly on pegfilgrastim than on GCSF, but the difference was not statistically significant. During pegfilgrastim therapy, a severe infection occurred in two patients and recurrent ENT infections in two other patients. Bone pain was reported by nine patients, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient (WHO grade III), chronic urticaria occurred in one patient (WHO grade III), and a single pegfilgrastim injection was followed by respiratory distress and death 15 days later in a patient with GDSIb. At the last update, 10 patients had stopped receiving pegfilgrastim and seven patients were still receiving pegfilgrastim.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional GCSF, pegfilgrastim is more difficult to use in congenital neutropenia, with more frequent adverse events and sometimes poor efficacy.