Pathology of liver transplantation

Multiplex Immunofluorescence for Detection of Spatial Distributions of Infiltrating T Cells Within Different Regions of Hepatic Lobules During Liver Transplantation Rejection

It remains unclear as to whether there are differences that exist in the types and functional status of immune cells within different areas of the liver lobules after rejection of liver transplantation. The composition of infiltrating T cells in liver allografts during liver transplantation rejection is indistinct and difficult to visualize within the same biopsy slide. In an attempt to rectify this problem, we applied multiplex immunofluorescent assays to assess the spatial distribution of various types of infiltrating T cells in different areas of the liver lobules after liver transplantation. In identical areas of the hepatic lobules, the percentage of CD4⁺ T, CD8⁺ T, and regulatory T (Treg) cells in the rejection group was greater than that observed in the non-rejection and normal groups. Within all three groups, the percentage of CD4⁺ T, CD8⁺ T, and Treg cells from the periportal to perivenous zones initially increased and then decreased. In the rejection group, the percentage of CD8⁺ T cells gradually increased from the periportal to perivenous zones, with maximal levels in the perivenous as compared with that in the transitional and periportal zones. In conclusion, levels of CD8⁺ T cells within different regions of liver lobules are closely related to levels of rejection after liver transplantation. Liver transplantation rejection may be linked with increases in CD8⁺ T cells within the perivenous zone. Although the regional percent of increase in CD4⁺ T cells may not reflect level of the rejection, the overall numbers of both of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells within different regions were closely related to rejection levels.

Structural integrity and identification of causes of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 5 years after transplantation

The clinicopathologic features of liver allograft dysfunction occurring in 51 symptomatic recipients after more than 5 years' survival (mean 7.1 years) with the same hepatic allograft were compared with those of a similar group of 14 asymptomatic patients (mean survival, 9.9 years) who underwent a nonclinically indicated protocol liver biopsy evaluation. Predictably, patients who had clinically indicated biopsies more frequently showed histopathologic alterations (76% versus 36%, p < 0.002). After detailed clinicopathologic correlation, the changes in the symptomatic patients were attributed primarily to definite or presumed viral hepatitis in 17 of 51 (33%) patients, 11 of whom had recurrent viral disease; seven of 51 (14%) had nonviral recurrent original disease, three (6%) had obstructive cholangiopathy, and 11 (22%) had acute and/or chronic rejection. In 13 of 51 (25%) of the symptomatic patients, the clinical and pathologic abnormalities were minimal. Long-term liver allograft survival in nine of 14 (64%) of the asymptomatic patients was associated with minimally abnormal histologic alterations. Two of the asymptomatic patients had obstructive cholangiopathy; two others has recurrence of the original disease and one has possible viral hepatitis. Viral hepatitis types B and C, alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, granulomatous hepatitis (not otherwise specified), and probably primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis were shown to recur after hepatic transplantation. The histopathologic changes associated with acute and chronic rejection frequently overlapped with other syndromes causing late dysfunction, such as chronic viral or autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, or primary sclerosing cholangitis; more than one insult could be identified in 15 cases, which made the differential diagnosis of causes of late liver allograft dysfunction much more difficult than early after hepatic transplantation. It is important to correlate the biopsy findings with the liver injury tests, the results of viral and autoimmune antibody serologic studies, and review of previous biopsies and to be aware of the original disease, recent changes in immunosuppression, and results of therapeutic intervention(s) to identify correctly the causes of liver allograft dysfunction in this patient population.

Biopsy findings in cases of rejection of liver allograft

Features of rejection were found in 21 needle biopsies obtained from seven patients after liver transplantation. Wedge biopsies taken peroperatively were used as a baseline for comparison. Rejection was diagnosed by excluding other known causes of graft dysfunction using appropriate methods. In cases in which these criteria were fulfilled a consistent picture of rejection was seen, and this was useful in clinical management. Two features constantly present in cases of acute rejection were: a dense mixed portal inflammatory infiltrate; and polymorphonuclear infiltration of biliary epithelium.

Pediatric liver transplantation. Part II. Diagnostic imaging in postoperative management

The postoperative diagnostic imaging examinations of 44 children who underwent 59 orthotopic liver transplantations were reviewed. The imaging modalities used for the evaluation of suspected complications include plain roentgenography, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), nuclear scintigraphy, arteriography, percutaneous and operative cholangiography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The main postoperative complications included ischemia, thrombosis (hepatic artery and portal vein), infarction, obstruction or leakage of the biliary anastomosis, hepatic and perihepatic infection, and allograft rejection. US, the most frequently used abdominal imaging modality, was best suited for detection of biliary duct dilatation, fluid collections in or around the transplanted liver, and hepatic arterial, inferior vena caval, and portal vein thrombosis. CT was especially helpful in corroborating findings of infection and in locating abscesses. Technetium 99m sulfur colloid (early- and late-phase imaging) provided a sensitive, although nonspecific, means of assessing allograft vascularization and morphology. Angiography showed vascularity most clearly, and cholangiography was the most useful in the assessment of bile duct patency. A diagnostic imaging algorithm is proposed for evaluation of suspected complications.