Felodipine-induced gingival hyperplasia: a clinical and histologic study

Oral Rehabilitation of a Patient With Generalized Inflammatory Gingival Overgrowth Exacerbated by Felodipine: A Case Report

Gingival enlargement may manifest as a side effect of medications (calcium channel blockers, anticonvulsants, or immunosuppressants) and may be associated with inflammation, malignancy, or genetic inheritance. This condition has a significant impact on a patient’s quality of life and affects their oral health status. This case report describes the management of a 68-year-old gentleman who presented with generalized gingival enlargement and chronic periapical abscess originating from tooth 34, which served as an abutment for a fixed partial prosthesis. The patient's medical history revealed that felodipine, an antihypertensive medication, was prescribed to him. A comprehensive treatment plan was developed to improve the patient’s quality of life.

Effect of Aging on Homeostasis in the Soft Tissue of the Periodontium: A Narrative Review

Aging is characterized by a progressive decline or loss of physiological functions, leading to increased susceptibility to disease or death. Several aging hallmarks, including genomic instability, cellular senescence, and mitochondrial dysfunction, have been suggested, which often lead to the numerous aging disorders. The periodontium, a complex structure surrounding and supporting the teeth, is composed of the gingiva, periodontal ligament, cementum, and alveolar bone. Supportive and protective roles of the periodontium are very critical to sustain life, but the periodontium undergoes morphological and physiological changes with age. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of molecular and cellular physiological changes in the periodontium, by focusing on soft tissues including gingiva and periodontal ligament.

Felodipine-associated gingival overgrowth in a type 2 diabetic patient: A case report and literature review

Gingival overgrowth (GO) includes gingival enlargement and hyperplasia and may be induced by certain drugs, including calcium channel blockers (CCBs), particularly first-generation CCBs. However, to date, only few cases of GO induced by second- or third-generation CCBs have been reported. The present study reports on a case of a 48-year-old diabetic male who was admitted to the First Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China) due to poor blood glucose control. This patient was diagnosed with GO. Review of the patient's medical history revealed diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and hypertension, as well as the use of felodipine, a second-generation CCB, to control hypertension. The hypertensive drugs were replaced and the new drugs helped the patient control his blood glucose levels. Additionally, the patient was instructed on methods he could use to improve his oral hygiene, including rinsing of the teeth following each meal and increasing the frequency of tooth brushing per day. After 3 months, the clinical symptoms of GO were relieved. The relevant literature was also reviewed to gain an improved understanding of the correlation between GO and CCBs, as well as diabetes and poor oral hygiene.

Molecular Aspects of Drug-Induced Gingival Overgrowth: An In Vitro Study on Amlodipine and Gingival Fibroblasts

Gingival overgrowth is a serious side effect that accompanies the use of amlodipine. Several conflicting theories have been proposed to explain the fibroblast’s function in gingival overgrowth. To determine whether amlodipine alters the fibrotic response, we investigated its effects on treated gingival fibroblast gene expression as compared with untreated cells. Materials and Methods: Fibroblasts from ATCC^® Cell Lines were incubated with amlodipine. The gene expression levels of 12 genes belonging to the “Extracellular Matrix and Adhesion Molecules” pathway was investigated in treated fibroblasts cell culture, as compared with untreated cells, by real time PCR. Results: Most of the significant genes were up-regulated. (CTNND2, COL4A1, ITGA2, ITGA7, MMP10, MMP11, MMP12, MMP26) except for COL7A1, LAMB1, MMP8, and MMP16, which were down-regulated. Conclusion: These results seem to demonstrate that amlodipine has an effect on the extracellular matrix of gingival fibroblast. In the future, it would be interesting to understand the possible effect of the drug on fibroblasts of patients with amlodipine-induced gingival hyperplasia.

Drug-Induced Gingival Hyperplasia in Transplant Recipients

Gingival hyperplasia is a common occurrence in transplant recipients who are taking cyclosporine. This condition can be complicated when calcium channel blockers or phenytoin are added to the armamentarium of medications; it can be painful and may interfere with eating, speech, and appearance. Multiple mechanisms exist for gingival overgrowth. Prevention with appropriate oral hygiene appears important in controlling the inflammatory component and decreasing the severity of the overgrowth. Patients must be aware of the potential for the development of gingival hyperplasia and must follow up with regular professional cleanings. If the overgrowth persists, treatment options should be discussed between patients and their physician. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, treatment with antibiotic therapy, and surgical excision or laser therapy are all potential therapies to consider.

Amlodipine-induced Gingival Hyperplasia - A Case Report and Review

Anticonvulsants, antihypertensive calcium channel blockers and immunosuppressants are the three main classes of drugs known to cause drug-induced gingival hypertrophy or hyperplasia. Among the calcium channel blockers, nifedipine administration has most frequently been associated with medication-related gingival hyperplasia. The incidence with amlodipine, which has a mode of action pharmacodynamically comparable to nifedipine, has rarely been reported. Here, we present a rare case of amlodipine-induced gingival hyperplasia in a hypertensive patient.

Calcium channel blocker-induced gingival enlargement

Despite the popularity and wide acceptance of the calcium channel blockers (CCBs) by the medical community, their oral impact is rarely recognized or discussed. CCBs, as a group, have been frequently implicated as an etiologic factor for a common oral condition seen among patients seeking dental care: drug-induced gingival enlargement or overgrowth. This enlargement can be localized or generalized, and can range from mild to extremely severe, affecting patient's appearance and function. Treatment options for these patients include cessation of the offending drug and substitution with another class of antihypertensive medication to prevent recurrence of the lesions. In addition, depending on the severity of the gingival overgrowth, nonsurgical and surgical periodontal therapy may be required. The overall objective of this article is to review the etiology and known risk factors of these lesions, their clinical manifestations and periodontal management.

Prevalence of gingival enlargement secondary to calcium channel blockers in patients with cardiovascular diseases

AIM

The purpose of the present study was to determine the prevalence and extent of gingival overgrowth in patients treated with calcium channel blockers for cardiovascular diseases.

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers are widely used in the treatment of hypertension, vasoplastic angina, and cardiacarrythmias. Gingival overgrowth resulting from the use of calcium channel blockers is of primary concern to dentists. The purpose of the present study is to determine the prevalence and extent of gingival overgrowth in patients treated with calcium channel blockers for various cardiovascular diseases, to assess their periodontal status and to correlate the factors like age, sex, duration, dosage, type of drugs that result in gingival overgrowth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was done in cardiac patients treated with calcium channel blockers, visiting The Railway hospital, Perumbur, Chennai. Information regarding medical history, type, duration, dosage of medication were recorded and analyzed. The periodontal condition of the patients was assessed using the plaque index, gingival index, calculus index, papillary bleeding index, and extent of gingival overgrowth using appropriate indices. The data was later subjected to statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In this study, a total of 213 cardiac patients (145 males and 68 females) who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened. The patients were between 19 and 69 years.

CONCLUSIONS

From the results of the present study it can be concluded that gingival overgrowth does occur with calcium channel blockers. Elderly males appeared to be more susceptible to the development of drug-induced gingival overgrowth, which was independent of dosage, duration of drug administered but the presence of local factors seemed to aggravate the same.

Demographic, Pharmacologic, and Periodontal Variables for Gingival Overgrowth in Subjects Medicated With Cyclosporin in the Absence of Calcium Channel Blockers

BACKGROUND

The role of cyclosporin in the absence of calcium channel blockers and the associated risk variables of development and severity of gingival overgrowth have not yet been properly established. The present study was conducted to determine the effect of potential risk variables for gingival overgrowth severity in Brazilian renal transplant subjects medicated with cyclosporin in the absence of any calcium channel blockers.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a public hospital in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Demographic, pharmacologic, and periodontal data, recorded from 194 subjects taking cyclosporin in the absence of calcium channel blockers, were analyzed using independent sample t, chi2 statistic, or Mann-Whitney U tests. The effects of potential risk variables of gingival overgrowth severity were determined using backward stepwise regression analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of clinically significant gingival overgrowth was 34.5% (N = 67). These subjects presented a significantly higher papillary bleeding index and a higher plaque index compared to those without clinically significant gingival overgrowth. When all demographic, pharmacologic, and periodontal data were evaluated in relation to gingival overgrowth severity, time since transplant, papillary bleeding index, serum cyclosporin concentration, and prednisolone and azathioprine dosages were significant in the univariate modeling (P <0.05) and remained significant when evaluated in the multivariate modeling (P <0.0001; adjusted R2 = 39.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of calcium channel blockers, this study showed that pharmacologic variables, such as cyclosporin serum concentration, prednisolone and azathioprine dosages, and time since transplant, are strongly related to gingival overgrowth. In addition, the periodontal variable papillary bleeding index highlighted the primary role of inflammation on the pathogenesis and severity of gingival overgrowth.

Felodipine-influenced gingival enlargement in an uncontrolled type 2 diabetic patient

BACKGROUND

The potential of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) to induce gingival enlargement (GE) as well as the influence of diabetes mellitus on periodontal tissues has been well documented. This case report documents a conservative clinical approach to the management of felodipine-influenced gingival enlargement and displays a clinical and histologic case of felodipine-influenced GE in an undiagnosed type 2 diabetic patient.

METHODS

At the initial examination, a medical consultation was requested and two incisional biopsies were taken for pathological evaluation. The patient was diagnosed with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Felodipine was withdrawn and the diabetes was controlled before dental treatment was initiated. The patient then underwent selective extractions and full-mouth scaling and root planing as well as oral hygiene instructions. No surgical therapy was indicated.

RESULTS

The histological results demonstrated the presence of elongated rete pegs; fibrous hyperplasia; a low-grade chronic inflammatory infiltrate, predominantly consisting of lymphocytes; and collagen bundle groups randomly distributed. These features were similar to those present in other drug-influenced GE. Clinical results have demonstrated almost complete resolution of GE after the withdrawal of felodipine and the control of diabetes. Further improvements were seen after scaling and root planing and oral hygiene instructions. No recurrences were noted 12 months after initial therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This report demonstrated that the control of systemic factors seemed to have the most influence on success for this particular case. Since the control of diabetes was managed at the same time as the felodipine withdrawal, it remains difficult to speculate how these two factors impacted both the severity of the GE and the therapeutic results. More importantly, the conservative treatment rendered demonstrated the stability of periodontal status during maintenance phase and the avoidance of surgical interventions.

Diltiazem did not induce gingival overgrowth in rats: a clinical, histological and histometric analysis

The administration of calcium channel blockers has been associated with gingival overgrowth. However, there are few studies in humans or animals that evaluated the effect of diltiazem on gingival tissues. The present study assessed the influence of diltiazem, at different dosages and treatment duration, on gingival tissues of rats, using clinical, histological and histometric analyses. Eighty young male rats were separated into eight groups according to the dosage and duration of treatment. Rats were treated for 20 or 40 days with a daily subcutaneous injection of 5, 20 or 50 mg/kg of body weight of diltiazem. The results confirmed that diltiazem did not induce gingival overgrowth in rats. For all animals, the evaluation did not show gingival alterations regardless of the dosages and periods of treatment. The histometric analysis showed no significant change in the area of epithelium and connective tissues, although after 40 days of treatment a decrease in the area of connective tissue was observed, without statistically significant difference from control groups. Within the limits of this study, we suggest that diltiazem did not induce gingival overgrowth.

Tetracycline Fibers as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Nifedipine-Induced Gingival Enlargement

BACKGROUND

The hypothesis that nifedipine-induced gingival enlargement in periodontitis patients can be treated with the adjunctive use of tetracycline (TCN) fibers was tested in this study.

METHODS

Ten patients (mean age 66 +/- 4 years) with chronic periodontitis combined with nifedipine-induced gingival enlargement participated. Full mouth recordings of clinical parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing, presence or absence of plaque) were assessed at baseline and gingival enlargement was estimated from casts. Participants were instructed in proper oral hygiene and received supragingival scaling before being reassessed 1 month later. They subsequently received full-mouth scaling and root planing followed by the immediate placement of TCN fibers in all pockets >5 mm. Clinical parameters were reassessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of treatment.

RESULTS

TCN fiber placement was well tolerated by patients. All clinical parameters recorded displayed significant improvements after treatment, and they were preserved for the 12-month experimental period. A significant reduction of the percentage of pockets >5 mm was noticed after treatment. The reduction of enlargement was still observed at 12 months despite patients not achieving optimal oral hygiene.

CONCLUSION

Placement of tetracycline fibers as an adjunct to mechanical treatment is an option for the non-invasive therapy of nifedipine-induced gingival enlargement in periodontitis patients whose general medical condition and concomitant ailments do not favor a surgical approach.

Prevalence and risk of gingival overgrowth in patients treated with diltiazem or verapamil

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors for gingival enlargement in patients treated with diltiazem or verapamil.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted and data from 46 patients actually taking diltiazem or verapamil were compared with 49 cardiovascular controls that never received any of these drugs. All patients were examined for the presence of gingival enlargement using two different indices, the vertical gingival overgrowth (GO) index, and horizontal Miranda & Brunet (MB) index in the inter-dental area. Gingival index, plaque index, and probing depth were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The total study population was 95:32 diltiazem-treated, 14 verapamil-treated and 49 cardiovascular control subjects. Gingival enlargement occurred in 31% (GO index) and 50% (MB index) of the patients taking diltiazem. Gingival enlargement in the verapamil-treated group was 21% for the GO index and 36% for the MB index. The prevalence of gingival enlargement was higher in the diltiazem- and verapamil-treated patients than in controls for both indices. The difference between the diltiazem-treated group and control was statistically significant (p=0.022 for GO and p=0.001 for MB), while the difference between the verapamil-treated group and controls was not significant. The risk of gingival enlargement (OR--Odds Ratio) associated with diltiazem therapy was 4.0 (1.2-13.1) for the GO index and of 6.0 (2.1-17.3) for the MB index. When the OR were adjusted for gingival index (GI) values, the risk of gingival enlargement was 3.5 (1.0-12.4) for the GO index and 6.2 (1.9-20.0) for the MB index. In the verapamil-treated group the OR values were not significant. The level of concordance between GO and MB indices in all three groups showed a kappa-value of 0.72 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients taking diltiazem are at high risk for gingival enlargement and gingivitis has a stronger effect than the drug treatment on gingival enlargement risk.

Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia in transplant recipients

Gingival hyperplasia is a common occurrence in transplant recipients who are taking cyclosporine. This condition can be complicated when calcium channel blockers or phenytoin are added to the armamentarium of medications; it can be painful and may interfere with eating, speech, and appearance. Multiple mechanisms exist for gingival overgrowth. Prevention with appropriate oral hygiene appears important in controlling the inflammatory component and decreasing the severity of the overgrowth. Patients must be aware of the potential for the development of gingival hyperplasia and must follow up with regular professional cleanings. If the overgrowth persists, treatment options should be discussed between patients and their physician. Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, treatment with antibiotic therapy, and surgical excision or laser therapy are all potential therapies to consider.

Prevalence and risk of gingival enlargement in patients treated with nifedipine

BACKGROUND

Gingival enlargement is a known side effect of nifedipine use. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence and risk factors for gingival enlargement in nifedipine-treated patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a primary care center. Data from 65 patients taking nifedipine were compared with 147 controls who had never received the drug. All patients were examined for the presence of gingival enlargement using 2 different indices: vertical gingival overgrowth index (GO) in 6 points around each tooth, and horizontal MB index in the interdental area. Gingival index, plaque index, and probing depth were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of gingival enlargement was significantly higher in nifedipine-treated cases than in controls (GO index, 33.8% versus 4.1%; MB index, 50.8% versus 7.5%, respectively). Higher gingival and plaque indices were observed in patients taking nifedipine. Among the possible risk factors, only the gingival index showed a significant association with gingival enlargement. The risk (odds ratio [OR]) of gingival enlargement associated with nifedipine therapy was 10.6 (3.8-29.1) for the GO index and 14.4 (6-34.6) for the MB index. Gingival index-adjusted ORs were 9.6 (3.3-28.1) and 9.7 (3.9-23.3), respectively. In the subset of high nifedipine exposure patients, the odds ratio for gingival enlargement increased to 17.4 (5.3-56.3) for the GO index and 23.6 (7.7-72.3) for the MB index. The concordance between GO and MB indices showed a kappa value of 0.689 in controls and 0.642 in patients treated with nifedipine.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients taking nifedipine are at high risk for gingival enlargement, and gingivitis acts as a predisposing factor.

A clinical review of drug-induced gingival overgrowths

There is an increasing number of medications associated with gingival overgrowth. These medications are used to treat a number of common conditions in the Australian population and as such dentists can expect to manage a number of patients with medication-related gingival overgrowth. This review highlights the clinical features and management of the common overgrowths associated with anticonvulsants, immunosuppressants and the calcium channel blockers.

Medically induced gingival hyperplasia

Gingival hyperplasia or gingival overgrowth is a common occurrence in patients taking phenytoin, cyclosporine, or calcium channel blockers. Speech, mastication, tooth eruption, and aesthetics may be altered. Controlling the inflammatory component through an appropriate oral hygiene program may benefit the patient by limiting the severity of the gingival overgrowth. In patients in whom gingival overgrowth is present or may be anticipated, recognition of this condition and referral to a general dentist or periodontist are appropriate steps to management. The physician's awareness of the potential for development of overgrowth and the dental practitioner's role in attempting to prevent or minimize this problem are important aspects. In this article, we discuss the medications associated with gingival hyperplasia and describe appropriate recommendations.

Drugs and oral disorders

This chapter affirms that drugs and medicaments may have a profound effect on the periodontal structures. In some instances, such as drug-induced melanosis, the effect may be insignificant to the health of the patient. In other circumstances, drug-induced disorders may initiate painful, destructive disease processes that will not be successfully managed unless the causal role of drugs is recognized and altered. Finally, the clinician must remain aware of the contribution of drug-induced xerostomia and smoking to increased susceptibility to dental and periodontal diseases.

Nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth in rats: brief review and experimental study

The first case report of gingival overgrowth induced by nifedipine (NIF), a calcium-beta blocker, was in 1984. However, the association between gingival alterations and the drug therapy of sodium diphenyl hydantoinate was initially described in 1939. The purpose of the experimental study was to examine the effect of NIF on gingival morphology in an animal model. Forty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 3 groups. Animals in each group daily received NIF in dimethyl sulfoxide by gastric feeding at a dosage of 0 (control), 30, or 50 mg/kg body weight for 9 weeks. Gingival gross morphology was assessed tri-weekly from stone models obtained from the mandibular incisal region. Animals were sacrificed at the end of study and tissue blocks were processed for histopathologic and histometric evaluation. Histometric analysis was performed at 5 selected tissue levels. Macro- and microscopic significantly increased gingival dimensions were demonstrated in NIF-treated animals compared to control. Although a fibrovascular tissue was observed in the tooth-gingiva interface for both NIF-treated and control animals, it was thicker and appeared earlier in NIF-treated animals. The results of the present study suggest that gingival overgrowth can be induced by NIF in rats and that the gingival overgrowth appears dose dependent.

Regression of nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia following switch to a same class calcium channel blocker, isradipine

Patients with nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia (GH) often require continued calcium channel blocker therapy. Switches to diltiazem and verapamil have been described; however, these drugs are of a different chemical class and present therapeutic limitations in some patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on nifedipine-induced GH of a switch to a dihydropyridine derivative with a low incidence of GH. Fourteen patients with nifedipine-induced GH were given a medical exam and a periodontal exam. The following parameters were assessed: probing depth (PD), gingival margin (GM), gingival thickness (GT), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). Intraoral photographs, study models, and a gingival biopsy for histological examination were taken. Following baseline measures, patients were randomized to continued treatment with nifedipine or an equivalent dose of isradipine in a single-blind fashion. Biweekly periodontal parameters were taken for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, some patients elected to receive 4 weeks of open label isradipine therapy, with biweekly examination continuing through the open label phase. The isradipine treatment arm showed a mean decrease in PD of 0.59 mm at week 8 (P < 0.05). No other measured parameter (GM, GT, PI, GI) was significantly changed, compared either to baseline or to the alternate treatment arm. Clinically, 60% of patients treated with isradipine exhibited a decrease in hyperplasia, while 66% of patients treated with nifedipine demonstrated an increase in hyperplasia, a significant difference (P < 0.05). When combined with open label data, patients switching therapy to isradipine exhibited an increase in GM (increase in recession) of 0.74 mm from baseline to week 12 (P < 0.05). No patients treated with isradipine exhibited an increase in gingival overgrowth. All patients exhibited adequate control of hypertension. We conclude that in hypertensive patients with nifedipine-induced GH, switching hypertensive therapy to isradipine may result in a regression of GH. When coupled with aggressive oral hygiene treatment, this drug may provide a reasonable option for patients requiring dihydropyridine treatment.

Immunohistochemical localization of transforming growth factor beta, basic fibroblast growth factor and heparan sulphate glycosaminoglycan in gingival hyperplasia induced by nifedipine and phenytoin

Although drug-induced gingival hyperplasia has been extensively studied, the pathogenesis of this disorder has not been clarified to date. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF beta) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) have been shown to be implicated in diverse fibrotic and hyperplastic diseases. Heparan sulphate proteoglycan (HSPG), which is composed of heparan sulphate glycosaminoglycan (HSGAG), has also been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of tissue overgrowth by enhancing the functions of bFGF. However, the possible implication of these growth factors in gingival hyperplasia has not been studied. Immunohistochemical localization of TGF beta, bFGF, their receptors and HSGAG was studied in 4 nifedipine-induced and 5 phenytoin-induced hyperplastic gingival tissues, and 5 non-hyperplastic control gingival tissues to elucidate the pathogenesis of this disease. Significant immunostaining against TGF beta, bFGF, the receptors of these two growth factors and HSGAG was observed in the lamina propria of hyperplastic gingival tissues while less immunostaining was observed in the controls. The mean numbers of immunostained cells against TGF beta, bFGF, their receptors in a square unit (0.1 x 0.1 mm) of the lamina propria, which were counted to 10 units of each hyperplastic gingival tissue, were significantly higher than those of the controls. The results suggest that the increased synthesis of TGF beta, bFGF, their receptors and HSGAG may be related to the pathogenesis of drug-induced gingival hyperplasia.

Periodontal implications: medically compromised patients

The presence of systemic disease in patients requiring periodontal therapy creates challenges for management. Alteration of treatment plans, with emphasis on physician consultation and preventive periodontal care, is frequently needed to minimize the impact of periodontal disease on the systemic condition. Conversely, detection and treatment of systemic disorders may impact upon the status of the periodontium and the success of periodontal therapy. The goal of holistic patient management is facilitated by a free flow of information between the patients and their medical and dental health care providers.

Evaluation of gingival and periodontal conditions following causal periodontal treatment in patients treated with nifedipine and diltiazem

It is established that phenytoin, cyclosporin and some calcium antagonists produce gingival overgrowth, but it is not known how this condition may respond to causal periodontal treatment. In order to find out, a longitudinal study was carried out, over a year, comparing a group of patients who were given nifedipine (NG, n = 18) and another group who were given diltiazem (DG, n = 13) with 2 others: one comprised cardiopathic patients who took no calcium antagonists (CG, n = 12) and the other contained patients who were medically healthy, with moderate periodontitis (HG, n = 12). On their basal visit, they were examined and instructed in oral hygiene, and then given causal periodontal treatment, being seen again at 4 and 8 months, when hygiene instructions were reinforced. They were seen for the last time at 12 months, when they were again examined. Groups NG and DG, on their basal visit, showed larger gum size than groups HG and CG, which was statistically significant; on their final visit, these differences remained only at the interproximal level. The number of patients with gingival overgrowth-taking the average of group HG as a minimal value-was much higher in groups CG (92%), DG (100%) and NG (89%) on the basal visit; on the final visit, the differences remained only in groups DG (85%) and NG (83%). The probing pocket depth reduction was much greater in groups HG and CG than in DG and NG, basically due to a greater gaining on clinical attachment level. The % of sites in which the pocket depth improved by more than 2 mm was 39.8% in HG, 54.5% in CG, 23.7% in DG and 28.7% in NG. The % of sites where the attachment gain by more than 2 mm was 46.2% in HG, 55.5% in CG, 22.8% in DG and 21.4% in NG. The amount of plaque and bleeding on probing, which was similar in all groups on the basal visit, decreased throughout the study, especially between the basal and 2nd visit in groups HG and CG. We have demonstrated that patients that take nifedipine and diltiazem show a larger gum size and their response to causal periodontal treatment is poorer than in the healthy and the cardiac groups.

Pathogenesis of drug-induced gingival overgrowth. A review of studies in the rat model

Drug-induced gingival overgrowth is a side effect associated principally with 3 types of drugs: anticonvulsant (phenytoin), immunosuppressant (cyclosporine A), and various calcium channel blockers (nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem). In this review, we describe the features of phenytoin-, cyclosporine A- and nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth in rats and discuss factors influencing the onset and severity of these disorders. There are several features common to the gingival overgrowth induced by these drugs: 1) gingival overgrowth is more conspicuous in the buccal than in the lingual gingiva and less severe in the maxilla than in the mandible; 2) once the blood concentration of the drug reaches a certain level as a result of increasing the dose, the incidence of gingival overgrowth is 100% and its severity is dependent on the blood level, the most severe overgrowth being induced by cyclosporine A; 3) the duration of drug administration for maximal gingival overgrowth to develop is about 40 days; 4) the gingival overgrowth regresses spontaneously after discontinuing the drug; 5) accumulation of dental plaque is not essential for the onset of overgrowth, but plays a role in its severity; and 6) more severe overgrowth is induced in young than in old rats. Furthermore, male rats are more susceptible than females to nifedipine-induced gingival overgrowth. These results suggest that drug-induced gingival overgrowth in rats is dependent on the oral drug dose, blood drug level, age, and sex and that preexisting gingival inflammation is a factor relevant to its severity. Since these factors have also been suggested to be important determinants for human drug-induced gingival overgrowth, the rat model may prove valuable in the future for elucidating the molecular pathogenesis of the disorder.

Nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia. A comprehensive review and analysis

A comprehensive review of the literature and analysis of the clinical history, mechanisms, pathogenesis, histology, and management of nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia is reported. A correlation to age, gender, drug, dosage, duration of drug therapy, location, and mode of treatment is discussed. The case report presented provides a model for management of nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia and other drug-induced gingival hyperplasia.

Clinical assessment of gingival size among patients treated with diltiazem

Gingival overgrowth induced by nifedipine has been extensively reported. This finding, however, does not apply to gingival size changes caused by other calcium antagonists such as diltiazem. We studied the gingiva of 13 subjects with ischemic cardiopathy who had been treated with diltiazem and established two control groups: (1) a healthy group of 12 patients and (2) a group of 10 patients with ischemic cardiopathy and concomitant treatment similar to that applied to the diltiazem group except that they had not been administered any type of calcium antagonists. The size of the gingiva around the six anterior teeth was measured on plaster models of the upper and lower jaws. Significantly higher scores of the size of the gingiva were found when patients treated with diltiazem were compared with the patients in the other two groups (p < 0.05) gingiva were found when patients treated with diltiazem were compared with the patients in the other two groups (p < 0.05) and also when interproximal (p < 0.05) and vestibular (p < 0.05) sites were considered. We did not observe any significant difference in the plaque index of each group (p < 0.05); only bleeding after probing was found statistically different between the diltiazem and the nondiltiazem groups.

Clinical assessment of gingival hyperplasia in patients treated with nifedipine

Gingival hyperplasia caused by the use of nifedipine has been extensively reported. In this paper, the gingiva of 18 patients suffering from cardiopathy and treated with nifedipine were compared with those of 10 patients with cardiac disorders who had not been treated with calcium antagonists and with a no-treatment group of 12 patients. Nifedipine produced gingival hyperplasia, although patients who had not been treated with calcium antagonists also had mild hyperplasia. Hyperplasia first appeared in the interproximal areas, an observation which may be important for early detection. There was a direct correlation between the degree of hyperplasia and the bacterial plaque score. When we studied the influence of administration time and dose of nifedipine with the degree of hyperplasia, no statistically significant differences were found.

Amlodipine-induced gingival overgrowth

Amlodipine is a calcium channel blocker used in the management of angina and hypertension. We report 3 cases of gingival overgrowth in adult dentate patients associated with chronic usage of this drug. Gingival changes occurred within 3 months of dosage and appeared to be compounded by the patient's existing periodontal condition. In all 3 patients, there was sequestration of amlodipine in their crevicular fluid. The significance of this finding in relation to the pathogenesis of this unwanted effect remains to be elucidated.

Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in cardiovascular disorders

Felodipine is a vascular-selective, dihydropyridine calcium antagonist previously investigated as a conventional tablet formulation administered twice daily. More recently considerable experience has been gained with an extended release (ER) formulation which has the convenience of once daily administration. Felodipine ER has been well studied in patients with essential hypertension. As monotherapy in mild to moderate essential hypertension, felodipine ER is at least as effective in reducing blood pressure as other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors, with some results favouring felodipine ER at a statistically significant level at the dosages used. It is also effective combined with controlled release metoprolol or enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In patients with more severe forms of essential hypertension uncontrolled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic therapy, felodipine ER was effective as an 'add-on' therapy in placebo-controlled trials, and, at the dosages used, more effective than either sustained release nifedipine or nitrendipine. Felodipine produces effective control of blood pressure without negative effects on cardiac performance. In addition to its antihypertensive action, results suggest that felodipine therapy is associated with significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, it appears suitable for use in patients with concomitant diabetes, renal dysfunction or asthma, and is also being investigated for use in patients with congestive heart failure or angina pectoris. Felodipine ER is an effective drug for the treatment of all grades of essential hypertension, and can be used both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Further clinical experience should fully establish the long term tolerability of felodipine ER and consequently its place in therapy relative to other accepted antihypertensive drugs. However, with the convenience of once daily administration, felodipine ER is a worthwhile innovation in the treatment of hypertension.

Incidence of verapamil-induced gingival hyperplasia in a dental population

The records of 5,000 dental patients were reviewed for history of verapamil use between 1987 and 1990. Twenty-four dentate patients who received verapamil for more than 1 year were identified. Of these, gingival hyperplasia occurred in 1 patient (4.1%) that was limited to the mandibular attached gingiva. Onset of gingival overgrowth was associated with drug dosage, bacterial accumulation, and gingival inflammation. Histologically, the findings resembled that seen in hyperplasia induced by phenytoin, cyclosporin, and other calcium channel blockers. Our data suggest that gingival hyperplasia caused by verapamil occurs less frequently than nifedipine-induced gingival hyperplasia.