Derived protein and cDNA sequences of hamster amelogenin

Alternative Splicing of the Amelogenin Gene in a Caudate Amphibian, Plethodon cinereus

As the major enamel matrix protein contributing to tooth development, amelogenin has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in tooth enamel formation. Previous studies have revealed amelogenin alternative splicing as a mechanism for amelogenin heterogeneous expression in mammals. While amelogenin and its splicing forms in mammalian vertebrates have been characterized, splicing variants of amelogenin gene still remains largely unknown in non-mammalian species. Here, using PCR and sequence analysis we discovered two novel amelogenin transcript variants in tooth organ extracts from a caudate amphibian, the salamander Plethodoncinereus. The one was shorter -S- (416 nucleotides including untranslated regions, 5 exons) and the other larger -L- (851 nt, 7 exons) than the previously published “normal” gene in this species -M- (812 nucleotides, 6 exons). This is the first report demonstrating the amelogenin alternative splicing in amphibian, revealing a unique exon 2b and two novel amelogenin gene transcripts in Plethodoncinereus.

Identification of a novel splicing form of amelogenin gene in a reptile, Ctenosaura similis

Amelogenin, the major enamel matrix protein in tooth development, has been demonstrated to play a significant role in tooth enamel formation. Previous studies have identified the alternative splicing of amelogenin in many mammalian vertebrates as one mechanism for amelogenin heterogeneous expression in teeth. While amelogenin and its splicing forms in mammalian vertebrates have been cloned and sequenced, the amelogenin gene, especially its splicing forms in non-mammalian species, remains largely unknown. To better understand the mechanism underlying amelogenin evolution, we previously cloned and characterized an amelogenin gene sequence from a squamate, the green iguana. In this study, we employed RT-PCR to amplify the amelogenin gene from the black spiny-tailed iguana Ctenosaura similis teeth, and discovered a novel splicing form of the amelogenin gene. The transcript of the newly identified iguana amelogenin gene (named C. Similis-T2L) is 873 nucleotides long encoding an expected polypeptide of 206 amino acids. The C. Similis-T2L contains a unique exon denominated exon X, which is located between exon 5 and exon 6. The C. Similis-T2L contains 7 exons including exon 1, 2, 3, 5, X, 6, and 7. Analysis of the secondary and tertiary structures of T2L amelogenin protein demonstrated that exon X has a dramatic effect on the amelogenin structures. This is the first report to provide definitive evidence for the amelogenin alternative splicing in non-mammalian vertebrates, revealing a unique exon X and the splicing form of the amelogenin gene transcript in Ctenosaura similis.

Identification and characterization of a squamate reptilian amelogenin gene: Iguana iguana

As the principal components of the developing tooth enamel matrix, amelogenins play a significant role in tooth enamel formation and organization. In order to elucidate the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, we have selected the Iguana iguana as a squamate model organism. Here we report the first complete squamate amelogenin sequence available as of yet and document unique features of Iguana amelogenins and enamel. Transmission electron microscopy documented randomly oriented Iguana enamel crystals during the elongation phase compared with organized enamel crystal patterns at comparable stages in mammals. Sequencing of PCR amplified products revealed a full-length I. iguana amelogenin cDNA containing 877 nucleotides with a 564 nucleotide coding sequence encoding 187 amino acids. The homologies of the newly discovered I. iguana amelogenin amino acid sequence with the published mouse, caiman (Palaeosuchus), and snake (Elaphe) amelogenin were 41.3%, 53.5%, and 55.5%, respectively. On Western blots one major protein with a molecular weight of 24 kDa, and two minor proteins with molecular weights of 28 and 13.5 kDa, respectively, were detected based on the cross-reactivity of antisera against recombinant Rana pipiens amelogenin proteins. Sequence analysis revealed a moderate sequence homology between mammalian and reptilian amelogenin genes. A significant alteration was the deletion of the hydrophilic GSP sequence from exon 3 in the mouse sequence resulting in a conversion to a hydrophobic region in Iguana. Together, these findings identified a novel amelogenin cDNA sequence in the squamate reptilian I. iguana and functional implications for the evolution of amelogenins and enamel in squamates.

Expression and characterization of a Rana pipiens amelogenin protein

Amelogenin, the major protein of developing enamel matrix, controls enamel crystal growth via unique supermolecular features. While much has been contributed to our understanding of mammalian amelogenin function, little is known about how amelogenin and its unique physico-chemical features have evolved among vertebrates. Here we report, for the first time, amphibian amelogenin recombinant protein expression and characterization in Rana pipiens. In order to characterize R. pipiens amelogenin, the newly discovered amelogenin coding sequence was amplified, subcloned, and expressed in Eshcerichia coli. Our newly generated R. pipiens amelogenin-specific antisera resolved a major 19-kDa band on western blots of frog tooth extracts and revealed an enamel organ tissue-specific localization pattern using immunohistochemistry. Using mass spectroscopy, a single major compound with a molecular weight of 21.6 kDa was detected, which corresponded to the amino acid sequence-based molecular weight prediction of the His fusion recombinant protein. Dynamic light scattering studies resolved 41-nm radius subunits compared with 14-nm radius subunits from mouse recombinant amelogenin controls. Transmission electron microscopy revealed defined spherical subunits in R. pipiens matrix self-assembly in contrast with a homogeneous 'stippled' matrix in mouse amelogenin matrix self-assembly. Our data suggest that R. pipiens amelogenin is distinguished from mammalian amelogenins by a number of unique physico-chemical properties which may be related to specific modes of crystal formation in frog enamel.

Genes and related proteins involved in amelogenesis imperfecta

Dental enamel formation is a remarkable example of a biomineralization process. The exact mechanisms involved in this process remain partly obscure. Some of the genes encoding specific enamel proteins have been indicated as candidate genes for amelogenesis imperfecta. Mutational analyses within studied families have supported this hypothesis. Mutations in the amelogenin gene (AMELX) cause X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta, while mutations in the enamelin gene (ENAM) cause autosomal-inherited forms of amelogenesis imperfecta. Recent reports involve kallikrein-4 (KLK4), MMP-20, and DLX3 genes in the etiologies of some cases. This paper focuses mainly on the candidate genes involved in amelogenesis imperfecta and the proteins derived from them, and reviews current knowledge on their structure, localization within the tissue, and correlation with the various types of this disorder.

Amelogenin sequence and enamel biomineralization in Rana pipiens

The amelogenin gene contributes the majority of tooth enamel proteins and plays a significant role in enamel biomineralization. While several mammalian and reptilian amelogenins have been cloned and sequenced, basal vertebrate amelogenin evolution remains to be understood. In order to start elucidating the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, the leopard frog (Rana pipiens) was used as a model. Tissues from Rana pipiens teeth were analyzed for enamel structure and RNA extracts were processed for sequence analysis. Electron microscopy revealed that Rana pipiens enamel contains long and parallel crystals similar to mammalian enamel, while immunoreactions confirmed the site-specific localization of cross-reactive amelogenins in Rana pipiens enamel. Sequencing of amelogenin PCR products revealed a 782bp cDNA with a 546-nucleotide coding sequence encoding 181 amino acids. The homology of the newly discovered Rana pipiens amelogenin nucleotide and amino acid sequence with the published mouse amelogenin was 38.6% and 45%, respectively. These findings report the first complete amelogenin cDNA sequence in amphibians and indicate a close homology between mammalian enamel formation and Rana pipiens enamel biomineralization.

Expression, structure, and function of enamel proteinases

Proteinases serve two important functions during dental enamel formation: They (a) process and (b) degrade enamel proteins. Different enzymes carry out these functions. Enamelysin (MMP-20) is the foremost enamel matrix-processing enzyme. Its expression initiates prior to the onset of dentin mineralization and continues throughout the secretory stage of amelogenesis. In vitro, enamelysin catalyzes all of the amelogenin cleavages that are known to occur during the secretory stage in vivo, and it is probably the enzyme responsible for the processing of all enamel proteins. There is evidence suggesting that enamelysin activity is critical for proper enamel formation. Uncleaved and processed enamel proteins often segregate into different compartments within the developing enamel layer, suggesting that they may have different functions. Intact ameloblastin and its C-terminal cleavage products localize in the superficial rod and interrod enamel, while its N-terminal cleavage products congregate in the sheath space. Intact enamelin is only present at the mineralization front within a micrometer of the enamel surface, while its cleavage products concentrate in the rod and interrod enamel. Processed enamel proteins accumulate during the secretory stage, but disappear early in the maturation stage. Enamel matrix serine proteinase 1 (EMSP1), now officially designated kallikrein 4 (KLK4), is believed to be the predominant degradative enzyme that clears enamel proteins from the matrix during maturation. KLK4 expression initiates during the transition stage and continues throughout maturation. KLK4 concentrates at the enamel surface when the enamel matrix disappears, and aggressively degrades amelogenin in vitro. During tooth development, proteinases are secreted by ameloblasts into the extracellular space, where they cleave enamel proteins by catalyzing the hydrolysis of peptide bonds. Enamel proteinases are present in low abundance and are not likely to participate directly in the mineralization process. Two major enamel proteinases have been identified: enamelysin (MMP20) and kallikrein 4 (KLK4). These proteinases are expressed at different times and have different functions. Their roles are to modify and/or to eliminate enamel matrix proteins, which affects the way enamel proteins interact with each other and with the developing enamel crystallites. A brief review of dental enamel formation is presented, followed by a more detailed analysis of enamelysin and KLK4 expression, structure, and function.

Fluoride enhances intracellular degradation of amelogenins during secretory phase of amelogenesis of hamster teeth in organ culture

Amelogenins are the major protein species synthesized by secretory ameloblasts and are believed to be involved in enamel mineralization. During enamel formation, amelogenins are progressively degraded into smaller fragments by protease activity. These amelogenin fragments are removed from the enamel extracellular space, thereby enabling full mineralization of the dental enamel. Enamel from fluorotic teeth is porous and contains more proteins and less mineral than sound enamel. In this study we examined the hypothesis that fluoride (F-) is capable of inhibiting the proteolysis of amelogenins in enamel being formed in organ culture. Hamster molar tooth germs in stages of secretory amelogenesis were pulse labeled in vitro with [3H]- or [14C] proline and subsequently pulse chased. The explants were exposed to F- at different days of chase (i.e., during secretory amelogenesis early after labeling, later after labeling or at stages just beyond secretory amelogenesis). Exposure of secretory stage explants to F- enhanced the release of radiolabeled fragments when F- was applied early after labeling but progressively less if applied later. In contrast, F- had no such effect in stages beyond secretion. The enhanced release of radiolabeled fragments in secretory stages was associated with a reduction of radioactivity in the soft tissue enamel organ indicating that fragmentation of enamel matrix proteins (mainly amelogenins) occurred intracellularly. Analysis by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) demonstrated that the fluorotic enamel contained less radiolabeled parent amelogenins (M(r) 28 kD and 26 kD) but more low-molecular-mass fragments than enamel from control explants. Our data indicate that F- promotes intracellular degradation of the newly synthesized parent amelogenins during secretory stage. Our in vitro data do not support the concept that F- impairs extracellular proteolysis of amelogenins, either in the secretory phase or in the stage just beyond the secretory phase.

Self-assembly properties of recombinant engineered amelogenin proteins analyzed by dynamic light scattering and atomic force microscopy

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis together with atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging was applied to investigate the supramolecular self-assembly properties of a series of recombinant amelogenins. The overall objective was to ascertain the contribution of certain structural motifs in amelogenin to protein-protein interactions during the self-assembly process. Mouse amelogenins lacking either amino- or carboxy-terminal domains believed to be involved in self-assembly and amelogenins having single or double amino acid mutations identical to those found in cases of amelogenesis imperfecta were analyzed. The polyhistidine-containingfull-length recombinant amelogenin protein [rp(H)M180] generated nanospheres with monodisperse size distribution (hydrodynamic radius of 20.7 +/- 2.9 nm estimated from DLS and 16.1 +/- 3.4 nm estimated from AFM images), comparable to nanospheres formed by full-length amelogenin rM179 without the polyhistidine domain, indicating that this histidine modification did not interfere with the self-assembly process. Deletion of the N-terminal self-assembly domain from amelogenin and their substitution by a FLAG epitope ("A"-domain deletion) resulted in the formation of assemblies with a heterogeneous size distribution with the hydrodynamic radii of particles ranging from 3 to 38 nm. A time-dependent dynamic light scattering analysis of amelogenin molecules lacking amino acids 157 through 173 and containing a hemagglutinin epitope ("B"-domain deletion) resulted in the formation of particles (21.5 +/- 6.8 nm) that fused to form larger particles of 49.3 +/- 4.3 nm within an hour. Single and double point mutations in the N-terminal region resulted in the formation of larger and more heterogeneous nanospheres. The above data suggest that while the N-terminal A-domain is involved in the molecular interactions for the formation of nanospheres, the carboxy-terminal B-domain contributes to the stability and homogeneity of the nanospheres, preventing their fusion to larger assemblies. These in vitro findings support the notion that the proteolytic cleavage of amelogenin at amino- and carboxy-terminii occurring during enamel formation influences amelogenin to amelogenin interactions during self-assembly and hence alters the structural organization of the developing enamel extracellular matrix, thus affecting enamel biomineralization.

The structural biology of the developing dental enamel matrix

The biomineralization of the dental enamel matrix with a carbonated hydroxyapatite mineral generates one of the most remarkable examples of a vertebrate mineralized tissue. Recent advances in the molecular biology of ameloblast gene products have now revealed the primary structures of the principal proteins involved in this extracellular mineralizing system, amelogenins, tuftelins, ameloblastins, enamelins, and proteinases, but details of their secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures, their interactions with other matrix and or cell surface proteins, and their functional role in dental enamel matrix mineralization are still largely unknown. This paper reviews our current knowledge of these molecules, the probable molecular structure of the enamel matrix, and the functional role of these extracellular matrix proteins. Recent studies on the major structural role played by the amelogenin proteins are discussed, and some new data on synthetic amelogenin matrices are reviewed.