Effect of ethanol and pH on the adsorption of drugs to activated charcoal: studies in vitro and in man

Management of acute carbamazepine poisoning: A narrative review

Standard management protocols are lacking and specific antidotes are unavailable for acute carbamazepine (CBZ) poisoning. The objective of this review is to provide currently available information on acute CBZ poisoning, including its management, by describing and summarizing various therapeutic methods for its treatment according to previously published studies. Several treatment methods for CBZ poisoning will be briefly introduced, their advantages and disadvantages will be analyzed and compared, and suggestions for the clinical treatment of CBZ poisoning will be provided. A literature search was performed in various English and Chinese databases. In addition, the reference lists of identified articles were screened for additional relevant studies, including non-indexed reports. Non-peer-reviewed sources were also included. In the present review, 154 articles met the inclusion criteria including case reports, case series, descriptive cohorts, pharmacokinetic studies, and in vitro studies. Data on 67 patients, including 4 fatalities, were reviewed. Based on the summary of cases reported in the included articles, the cure rate of CBZ poisoning after symptomatic treatment was 82% and the efficiency of hemoperfusion was 58.2%. Based on the literature review, CBZ is moderately dialyzable and the recommendation for CBZ poisoning is supportive management and gastric lavage. In severe cases, extracorporeal treatment is recommended, with hemodialysis as the first choice.

Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose

INTRODUCTION

The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal?  Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.

METHODS

A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews (via Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations.  One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.

RESULTS

From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 in vitro studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% (n = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% (n = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% (n = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% (n = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% (n = 484) of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death.  Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.

In Vitro Study of Adsorption Kinetics of Dextromethorphan Syrup onto Activated Charcoal in Simulated Gastric and Intestinal Fluids

Adsorption kinetics of dextromethorphan (DXM) syrup in simulated gastric and intestinal fluids onto activated charcoal (AC) were investigated in an in vitro model. The adsorption studies were performed as a function of time, initial concentration, and temperature. The quantification of DXM adsorbed onto AC was obtained from the Langmuir adsorption isotherms using HPLC. The maximum adsorption capacities (at 95% confidence limits) of AC for DXM were 111.615 [106.38; 126.85] mg in simulated intestinal environment (pH 6.8) and 78.314 [86.206; 70.422] mg in simulated gastric environment (pH 1.2). The adsorption capacity of AC for DXM in simulated gastric fluid (pH 1.2) was not significantly different from the adoption capacity of AC for DXM in simulated intestinal fluid (pH 6.8). Moreover, the adsorption kinetics behavior of dextromethorphan onto AC followed pseudo-second-order kinetics. Our results show that AC in therapeutically acceptable doses can be beneficial in the majority of oral overdose of DXM.

Amitriptyline, clomipramine, and doxepin adsorption onto sodium polystyrene sulfonate

Purpose of the study

Comparative in vitro studies were carried out to determine the adsorption characteristics of 3 drugs on activated charcoal (AC) and sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS). Activated charcoal (AC) has been long used as gastric decontamination agent for tricyclic antidepressants (TCA).

Methods

Solutions containing drugs (amitriptyline, clomipramine, or doxepin) and variable amount of AC or SPS were incubated for 30 minutes.

Results

At pH 1.2 the adsorbent: drug mass ratio varied from 2 : 1 to 40 : 1 for AC, and from 0.4 : 1 to 8 : 1 for SPS. UV–VIS spectrophotometer was used for the determination of free drug concentrations. The qmax of amitriptyline was 0.055 mg/mg AC and 0.574 mg/mg SPS, qmax of clomipramine was 0.053 mg/mg AC and 0.572 mg/mg SPS, and qmax of doxepin was 0.045 mg/mg AC and 0.556 mg/mg SPS. The results of adsorption experiments with SPS revealed higher values for the qmax parameters in comparison with AC.

Conclusion

In vitro gastric decontamination experiments for antidepressant amitriptyline, clomipramine, and doxepin showed that SPS has higher qmax values than the corresponding experiments with AC. Therefore, we suggest SPS is a better gastric decontaminating agent for the management of acute TCA intoxication.

Activated charcoal for pediatric poisonings: the universal antidote?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For decades, activated charcoal has been used as a 'universal antidote' for the majority of poisons because of its ability to prevent the absorption of most toxic agents from the gastrointestinal tract and enhance the elimination of some agents already absorbed. This manuscript will review the history of activated charcoal, its indications, contraindications, and the complications associated with its use as reported in the literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent randomized prospective studies, although with small numbers, have shown no difference in length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality between groups who received and did not receive activated charcoal. No study has had sufficient numbers to satisfactorily address clinical outcome in patients who received activated charcoal less than 1 h following ingestion.

SUMMARY

If used appropriately, activated charcoal has relatively low morbidity. Due to the lack of definitive studies showing a benefit in clinical outcome, it should not be used routinely in ingestions. AC could be considered for patients with an intact airway who present soon after ingestion of a toxic or life-threatening dose of an adsorbable toxin. The appropriate use of activated charcoal should be determined by the analysis of the relative risks and benefits of its use in each specific clinical scenario.

Influence of activated charcoal on the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin following intravenous and oral administration of a 400 mg single dose to healthy males

AIMS

To evaluate the extent to which enterohepatic recycling circulation contributes to moxifloxacin bioavailability in healthy, males by administration of activated charcoal and to evaluate the efficacy of activated charcoal administration in decreasing systemic concentrations of moxifloxacin in the event of overdose.

METHODS

Nine healthy males, mean age 34 years (range 23-45 years) participated in a single centre, randomized, nonplacebo-controlled, three way crossover study. The pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in plasma and urine were determined for up to 96 h following a 400 mg single dose randomly administered on three separate occasions with a minimum washout phase of 1 week. Treatment A was 400 mg moxifloxacin IV as a 1 h infusion, treatment B was 400 mg moxifloxacin IV as a 1 h infusion with oral activated charcoal (5 g directly before the start of the infusion, 5 g immediately after the end of the infusion, and 10 g at 2, 4 and 8 h after the start of the infusion), treatment C was 400 mg oral moxifloxacin with activated charcoal (10 g 15 min before and at 2, 4 and 8 h after drug administration). The subjects underwent a series of clinical and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Single 400 mg doses of moxifloxacin (PO and/or IV) were safe and well tolerated. The bioavailability of moxifloxacin was significantly decreased when given with charcoal (AUC = 35.5 (IV reference) vs 5.40 (PO) vs 28.5 (IV) mg l(-1) h). Concurrently peak concentrations were lowered C(max) = 3.38 (IV reference) vs 0.62(PO) vs 2.97 (IV) mg l(-1)) by approximately 85% (P < 0.05) following oral administration and by 20% after IV treatment (P < 0.05). Bioavailability amounted to 15.4% (95% confidence interval 9.6, 25.0%) for treatment B while it was 80.4% (95% confidence interval 76.3.6, 84.6%) for treatment C. Terminal half-lives were not affected. The kinetics of urinary excretion corroborated these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that moxifloxacin undergoes pronounced enteric recycling after systemic uptake. In addition, these findings confirm that activated charcoal may be useful in treating moxifloxacin overdose by preventing its absorption.

The effect of ethanol and pH on the adsorption of drugs from simulated gastric fluid onto activated charcoal

The effect of ethanol and pH on the adsorption of acetaminophen (ACET), phenobarbital (PHB), phenytoin (PHY), salicylic acid (SA), and theophylline (THEO) from simulated gastric fluid onto activated charcoal was studied. For the ethanol study, each drug was prepared at a concentration of 10 g/L in ethanol; in hydrochloric acid (HCl), 1.2 mol/L; and in HCl, 1.2 mol/L, containing 75% ethanol, 50% ethanol, and 25% ethanol (v/v), respectively. For the pH study, each drug was prepared at a concentration of 10 g/L in HCl, 1.2 mol/L, pH 1.0, and in buffers of pH 1.7, 3.0, 4.0, 4.8, 5.8, 6.5, 7.4, and 9.4. After the addition of 1 g of activated charcoal to 10 mL of each solution, it was incubated for one hour at 37 degrees C. For comparison, in each experiment a blank consisting of the solution without charcoal was also incubated. With increasing concentrations of ethanol, there were substantial decreases in the adsorption of ACET, PHB, and PHY to charcoal. Ethanol-induced decreases in the adsorption of SA and THEO were less pronounced. Changes in pH did not affect the adsorption of ACET, PHB, PHY, or THEO. However, the adsorption of SA was decreased slightly at pH 1.0 and 3.0.

American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Almost all cases of acute methanol toxicity result from ingestion, though rarely cases of poisoning have followed inhalation or dermal absorption. The absorption of methanol following oral administration is rapid and peak methanol concentrations occur within 30-60minutes.

MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY

Methanol has a relatively low toxicity and metabolism is responsible for the transformation of methanol to its toxic metabolites. Methanol is oxidized by alcohol dehydrogenase to formaldehyde. The oxidation of formaldehyde to formic acid is facilitated by formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Formic acid is converted by 10-formyl tetrahydrofolate synthetase to carbon dioxide and water. In cases of methanol poisoning, formic acid accumulates and there is a direct correlation between the formic acid concentration and increased morbidity and mortality. The acidosis observed in methanol poisoning appears to be caused directly or indirectly by formic acid production. Formic acid has also been shown to inhibit cytochrome oxidase and is the prime cause of ocular toxicity, though acidosis can increase toxicity further by enabling greater diffusion of formic acid into cells.

FEATURES

Methanol poisoning typically induces nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and mild central nervous system depression. There is then a latent period lasting approximately 12-24 hours, depending, in part, on the methanol dose ingested, following which an uncompensated metabolic acidosis develops and visualfunction becomes impaired, ranging from blurred vision and altered visual fields to complete blindness.

MANAGEMENT

For the patient presenting with ophthalmologic abnormalities or significant acidosis, the acidosis should be corrected with intravenous sodium bicarbonate, the further generation of toxic metabolite should be blocked by the administration of fomepizole or ethanol and formic acid metabolism should be enhanced by the administration of intravenous folinic acid. Hemodialysis may also be required to correct severe metabolic abnormalities and to enhance methanol and formate elimination. For the methanol poisoned patient without evidence of clinical toxicity, the first priority is to inhibit methanol metabolism with intravenous ethanol orfomepizole. Although there are no clinical outcome data confirming the superiority of either of these antidotes over the other, there are significant disadvantages associated with ethanol. These include complex dosing, difficulties with maintaining therapeutic concentrations, the need for more comprehensive clinical and laboratory monitoring, and more adverse effects. Thus fomepizole is very attractive, however, it has a relatively high acquisition cost.

CONCLUSION

The management of methanol poisoning includes standard supportive care, the correction of metabolic acidosis, the administration of folinic acid, the provision of an antidote to inhibit the metabolism of methanol to formate, and selective hemodialysis to correct severe metabolic abnormalities and to enhance methanol and formate elimination. Although both ethanol and fomepizole are effective, fomepizole is the preferred antidote for methanol poisoning.

Effect of ethanol and pH on the adsorption of acetaminophen (paracetamol) to high surface activated charcoal, in vitro studies

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) intoxication often in combination with ethanol, is seen commonly in overdose cases. Doses of several grams might be close to the maximum adsorption capacity of the standard treatment dose (50g) of activated charcoal. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum adsorption capacity for paracetamol for two types of high surface-activated charcoal [Carbomix and Norit Ready-To-Use (not yet registered trademark in Denmark) both from Norit Cosmara, Amersfoort, The Netherlands] in simulated in vivo environments: At pH 1.2 (gastric environment), at pH 7.2 (intestinal environment), and with and without 10% ethanol.

METHODS

Activated charcoal, at both gastric or intestinal pHs, and paracetamol were mixed, resulting in activated charcoal-paracetamol ratios from 10:] to 1:1. In trials with ethanol, some of the gastric or intestinal fluid was replaced with an equivalent volume of ethanol, resulting in an ethanol concentration of 10% v/v. After incubation, the concentration of unabsorbed paracetamol was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The maximum adsorption capacity of paracetamol to activated charcoal was calculated as mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal, using Langmuir's isotherm.

RESULTS

Carbomix [95% confidence limits are shown in square brackets]: 623.7 [612.8;634.5] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 1.2), 626.2 [611.6;640.9] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 7.2); Norit Ready-To-Use: 693.6 [676.8;710.5] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 1.2), 722.6 [687.4;757.9] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 7.2). For experiments with ethanol (10% v/v) the results with Carbomix were 465.7 [449.2;482.2] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 1.2), 498.6 [481.8;515.6] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 7.2); with Norit Ready-To-Use: 617.2 [606.6;627.7] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 1.2), 640.6 [624.9;656.4] mg paracetamol adsorbed/g activated charcoal (pH 7.2).

CONCLUSION

Under conditions simulating immediate treatment with charcoal, a standard dose of 50 g of either of the two tested activated charcoals adsorbed a sufficient amount of paracetamol to be beneficial in the treatment of the majority of overdoses of this drug. For both types of activated charcoal, with or without ethanol, there was no significant difference in the adsorption of paracetamol at pH 1.2 and 7.2. Norit Ready-To-Use had a larger maximum adsorption capacity than Carbomix, and was not as sensitive as Carbomix to environmental changes (pH and ethanol). The presence of 10% ethanol lowered the adsorption capacity of the two tested activated charcoal preparations by an amount that might be clinically relevant in cases of intoxications by high-gram doses.

Effectiveness of delayed activated charcoal administration in simulated paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose

AIMS

Oral activated charcoal is used to treat drug overdose and is effective at reducing drug absorption when administered within 1 h of drug ingestion. There are fewer data on efficacy when the delay is longer, as is the case in most drug overdoses. This study investigated the efficacy of activated charcoal at preventing paracetamol (acetaminophen) absorption after simulated overdose when administration was delayed between 1 and 4 h.

METHODS

An open randomized-order four-way crossover study was performed in healthy volunteers comparing the effect of activated charcoal 50 g on the absorption of 3 g paracetamol tablets when administered after an interval of 1, 2 or 4 h or not at all. Plasma paracetamol concentrations were measured over 9 h after paracetamol ingestion using h.p.l.c. and areas under the curve between 4 and 9 h (AUC(4,9 h)) calculated as a measure of paracetamol absorption.

RESULTS

Activated charcoal significantly reduced paracetamol AUC(4,9 h) when administered after 1 h (mean reduction 56%; 95% Confidence intervals 34, 78; P<0.002) or 2 h (22%; 6, 39; P<0.03) but not after 4 h (8%; -8, 24). When administered after 1 h activated charcoal reduced individual plasma paracetamol concentrations significantly at all times between 4 and 9 h after paracetamol administration. Administration at 2 or 4 h had no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These results in healthy volunteers cannot be extrapolated directly to poisoned patients. However, they provide no evidence of efficacy for activated charcoal when administered after an interval of more than 2 h.

Position statement: single-dose activated charcoal. American Academy of Clinical Toxicology; European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists

In preparing this Position Statement, all relevant scientific literature was identified and reviewed critically by acknowledged experts using agreed criteria. Well-conducted clinical and experimental studies were given precedence over anecdotal case reports and abstracts were not usually considered. A draft Position Statement was then produced and subjected to detailed peer review by an international group of clinical toxicologists chosen by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists. The Position Statement went through multiple drafts before being approved by the boards of the two societies and being endorsed by other societies. The Position Statement includes a summary statement for ease of use and is supported by detailed documentation which describes the scientific evidence on which the Statement is based. Single-dose activated charcoal should not be administered routinely in the management of poisoned patients. Based on volunteer studies, the effectiveness of activated charcoal decreases with time; the greatest benefit is within 1 hour of ingestion. The administration of activated charcoal may be considered if a patient has ingested a potentially toxic amount of a poison (which is known to be adsorbed to charcoal) up to 1 hour previously; there are insufficient data to support or exclude its use after 1 hour of ingestion. There is no evidence that the administration of activated charcoal improves clinical outcome. Unless a patient has an intact or protected airway, the administration of charcoal is contraindicated.

In vitro adsorption of dichlorvos and parathion by activated charcoal

Accidental and suicidal ingestions of organophosphate compounds continue to be a common occurrence in Turkey. Activated charcoal administration without gastric emptying has been advocated as primary therapy in most acute poisoning cases, although some references do not recommend activated charcoal use in organophosphate poisoning. This study was performed to determine the in vitro adsorption of dimethyl dichlorovinyl phosphate (dichlorvos) and parathion by activated charcoal over a wide range of charcoal:organophosphate ratios (1:1, 2.5:1, 5:1, 10:1 and 20:1, g:g). The charcoal binding ability of dichlorvos and parathion were studied in both pH 1.2 and pH 7 environments. The supernatant was extracted with n-hexane and then analyzed by gas chromatography. Each incremental increase in charcoal dose increased the percent adsorption of dichlorvos and parathion. At the 20:1 ratio, 82.8 +/- 2.0/87.3 +/- 2.9% (pH 1.2/7.0) of dichlorvos and 59.3 +/- 4.5/64.5 +/- 6.1% (pH 1.2/7.0) of parathion were bound by activated charcoal. There were no significant differences in amounts of compound bound in the acid and neutral solutions. Large doses of activated charcoal effectively bind dichlorvos and parathion in vitro. In vivo research should be performed to determine activated charcoal's role in organophosphate poisoning cases.

Lowering of blood ethanol by activated carbon products in rats and dogs

Earlier studies on the effects of activated carbon (charcoal) on blood alcohol levels (BAL) in animals have been conflicting. The present study was designed to study the effects of a commercially available product (Charcoaid) and a new patented product (Alcosorb), in capsules and in suspension on the BAL of rats and dogs. We compared peak BAL and the regression of BAL with time during ethanol clearance in rats given 1.5 g/kg of carbon products in sorbitol intragastrically, followed 5 min later by 3.5 g/kg ethanol intragastrically. Peak BAL were significantly higher after Charcoaid 1 h after intubation, compared to Alcosorb and sorbitol (vehicle for the charcoal suspension). A study in which ethanol was given intraperitoneally instead of intragastrically showed no differences in ethanol BAL produced by the intragastric carbon treatments. In a crossover study using Beagle dogs, 780 mg capsules of carbon products ("low dose") given 5 min before ethanol had no significant effect on BAL. A "high" dose of 20 g of charcoal products suspended in water, followed by ethanol intragastrically, was also ineffective in lowering blood ethanol. However, carbon products suspended in a water/ethanol vehicle (20% w/v) did significantly lower peak BAL. We conclude that carbon products significantly lower BAL in rats and dogs, and that in rats, Alcosorb and sorbitol produce a greater BAL lowering effect than Charcoaid for a brief time after administration. The mechanisms of the BAL lowering effect by sorbitol and charcoal products are probably different.

Methanol poisoning

Methanol ingestion is an uncommon form of poisoning that can cause severe metabolic disturbances, blindness, permanent neurologic dysfunction and death. While methanol itself may be harmless, it is converted in vivo to the highly toxic formic acid. The diagnosis is sometimes elusive and requires a high index of suspicion. Because antidotal treatment is available it is important to recognize methanol poisoning promptly. The presence of metabolic acidosis associated with an increased anion gap and increased osmol gap are important laboratory findings. Specific therapeutic measures include correction of the metabolic acidosis with sodium bicarbonate and administration of enteral or parenteral ethanol to competitively inhibit the metabolic breakdown of methanol to formic acid. Hemodialysis accelerates the elimination of both methanol and formic acid and also assists in correction of the metabolic acidosis. Experimental data suggests that administration of folic acid may be of benefit by hastening the metabolism of formic acid to carbon dioxide. Prompt institution of specific therapy can probably decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with this form of poisoning.

Cocaine adsorption to activated charcoal in vitro

Although activated charcoal (AC) is commonly used after ingestions of cocaine, the ability of AC to bind with this drug is unknown. We studied binding of cocaine to AC in vitro. Cocaine adsorption to charcoal for AC:drug ratios of 1:1, 2.5:1, and 5:1 at pH 1.2 was 40%, 92%, and 99%, respectively; at pH 8.0, it was 78%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. All means were significantly different (P less than 0.05) versus the control (no AC) at each pH. At the AC:drug ratio of 1:1, there was also significantly greater adsorption of cocaine at pH 8.0 than at pH 1.2. This study shows that AC strongly adsorbs cocaine under both acidic and alkaline conditions.

[Oral administration of activated charcoal-sorbitol suspension as first aid in prevention of poison resorption?]

Due to its paramount adsorption capacity, activated charcoal is supposed to be the remedy of choice for binding a variety of drugs in the gastrointestinal tract. Hence it is surprising--at least according to the advice of German textbooks--that activated charcoal is only recommended for administration after time-consuming treatments like induced emesis and gastric lavage. Particularly with infants at home, a ready-for-use suspension of activated charcoal would allow the early management of acute poisoning. In such cases, inactivation of the poison by adsorption could be particularly helpful, since the period after ingestion is usually short. The charcoal-sorbitol-suspension (30 g activated charcoal in 150 ml of 70% sorbitol) is a creamy preparation which is easy to drink, because density and viscosity prevent sedimentation. The prescription-free drugs can be dispensed by each pharmacist. The present study was undertaken to investigate the influence of sorbitol on the adsorption capacity of activated charcoal. To this end, adsorption isotherms were established in vitro and compared with results in volunteers to whom NAPAP, diphenhydramine or codeine was administered separately. These drugs are gaining increasing importance in medicinal toxicology since they are constituents of various analgesics and cold remedies. To determine absorption, the cumulative urinary excretion was estimated of the parent drugs and their main metabolites.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of oral activated charcoal on the pharmacokinetics of quinidine and quinine administered intravenously to rabbits

The pharmacokinetics of quinidine and quinine following intravenous administration (10 mg/kg) with and without concurrent treatment with oral activated charcoal was studied in the rabbit. Marked differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters. Compared to quinidine, quinine was characterized by larger volume of distribution (Vd), systemic clearance (Cl) and elimination rate constant (Kel), and smaller half-life of elimination (t1/2), mean residence time (MRT) and area under the curve (AUC). Activated charcoal administered orally (15 g) significantly decreased the serum concentrations of quinidine but not quinine. Furthermore, charcoal treatment significantly enhanced the systemic elimination of quinidine as indicated by the significant increase in Cl and decrease in t1/2, MRT and AUC. By contrast, activated charcoal had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of quinine. Differences between quinidine and quinine in respect to the effect of activated charcoal on the systemic elimination of these drugs seem at least, in part, dependent on dispositional factors. The high Cl and Vd of quinine in the rabbit are probably factors that mask the effect of charcoal on the elimination of this drug.

Gastric contents alter blood alcohol levels and clearance after parenteral ethanol

Several different substances, including water, charcoal, fructose, montmorillonite clay, and liquid diets used for chronic ethanol exposure, were given intragastrically to rats, followed by a low dose of ethanol injected subcutaneously. Peak blood alcohol levels (BAL) and ethanol clearance rates were found to differ depending upon the type of gastric contents. As expected, fructose lowered peak BAL and increased ethanol clearance, and charcoal lowered peak BAL, but decreased ethanol clearance. Two liquid diets, Shorey and Sustacal, when compared to an intragastric water load, also lowered peak BAL and increased ethanol clearance of subcutaneously-administered ethanol. The difference between intragastric water and Shorey liquid diet was also seen when ethanol was administered intravenously, suggesting that absorption of ethanol from the subcutaneous site was not being affected. When sleep-inducing doses of ethanol were given subcutaneously, intragastric substances did not produce differences in sleeptimes. In in vitro studies, only charcoal was able to bind ethanol, presumably by absorption onto charcoal particles. Volume of distribution measurements were inversely related to the peak BALs measured at 60 minutes after injection, suggesting that ethanol was partitioning between the blood and stomach contents. We conclude that the presence in the stomach of various substances can lower peak BAL and increase ethanol clearance in a rapid fashion, primarily through a change in volume of distribution and possibly through a rapid change in stomach or liver metabolism of ethanol.

The effect of "superactive" charcoal and magnesium citrate solution on blood ethanol concentrations and area under the curve in humans

Eleven healthy males between 21 and 37 years of age were enrolled into a non-randomized crossover study comparing superactive charcoal (SAC) given after ethanol administration. After receiving 0.6 gm/kg ethanol orally (95% V/V diluted in orange juice), blood was sampled at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 hours. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and the highest ethanol level was recorded. After a minimum of 1 week washout, the volunteers ingested an identical ethanol dose but in addition received 60 grams of SAC and 300 ml of 5.8% magnesium citrate solution 1 and 3 hours post ingestion. The data was compared using the paired t-test with p less than 0.05 considered significant. Nine volunteers completed the study. Volunteers had difficulty ingesting the full second 60 gram SAC dose. The AUC (mean 1184 mcg x hr/ml) and highest ethanol concentrations (mean 46.3 mg/dl) for the control group were not significantly greater than in the SAC group (mean AUC 1167 mcg x hr/ml and highest ethanol concentration of 49.0 mg/dl). The ethanol concentration in the SAC group was significantly less than control only at 2.0 hours (31.6 mg/dl vs 36.6 mg/dl, p less than 0.01). The peak ethanol concentration in the SAC group occurred at 1.0 hours in 7 of 9 volunteers, while in the control group, peak concentration occurred randomly between 0.5 and 2.0 hours. We conclude SAC in the dose used is not effective in decreasing AUC, highest ethanol concentration, and blood ethanol levels when given 1 and 3 hours after ethanol ingestion.

Oral activated charcoal in the treatment of intoxications. Role of single and repeated doses

Activated charcoal has an ability to adsorb a wide variety of substances. This property can be applied to prevent the gastrointestinal absorption of various drugs and toxins and to increase their elimination, even after systemic absorption. Single doses of oral activated charcoal effectively prevent the gastrointestinal absorption of most drugs and toxins present in the stomach at the time of charcoal administration. Known exceptions are alcohols, cyanide, and metals such as iron and lithium. In general, activated charcoal is more effective than gastric emptying. However, if the amount of drug or poison ingested is very large or if its affinity to charcoal is poor, the adsorption capacity of activated charcoal can be saturated. In such cases properly performed gastric emptying is likely to be more effective than charcoal alone. Repeated dosing with oral activated charcoal enhances the elimination of many toxicologically significant agents, e.g. aspirin, carbamazepine, dapsone, dextropropoxyphene, cardiac glycosides, meprobamate, phenobarbitone, phenytoin and theophylline. It also accelerates the elimination of many industrial and environmental intoxicants. In acute intoxications 50 to 100g activated charcoal should be administered to adult patients (to children, about 1 g/kg) as soon as possible. The exceptions are patients poisoned with caustic alkalis or acids which will immediately cause local tissue damages. To avoid delays in charcoal administration, activated charcoal should be a part of first-aid kits both at home and at work. The 'blind' administration of charcoal neither prevents later gastric emptying nor does it cause serious adverse effects provided that pulmonary aspiration in obtunded patients is prevented. In severe acute poisonings oral activated charcoal should be administered repeatedly, e.g. 20 to 50g at intervals of 4 to 6 hours, until recovery or until plasma drug concentrations have fallen to non-toxic levels. In addition to increasing the elimination of many drugs and toxins even after their systemic absorption, repeated doses of charcoal also reduce the risk of desorbing from the charcoal-toxin complex as the complex passes through the gastrointestinal tract. Charcoal will not increase the elimination of all substances taken. However, as the drug history in acute intoxications is often unreliable, repeated doses of oral activated charcoal in severe intoxications seem to be justified unless the toxicological laboratory has identified the causative agent as not being prone to adsorption by charcoal. The role of repeated doses of oral activated charcoal in chronic intoxication has not been clearly defined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Toxicant adsorption on activated charcoal: is the fraction adsorbed a unique function of the charcoal:adsorbate ratio?

In several recent studies the adsorption of toxicants on activated charcoal has been reported graphically in the form of plots presenting the fraction of toxicant unadsorbed at equilibrium (F) as a unique function of the ratio (R) of the amount of activated charcoal to that of total toxicant. Derivation of the mathematical relationship between these two variables from either the Freundlich or Langmuir isotherms reveals F is not uniquely defined by R, unless the amount of activated charcoal, the equilibrium concentration of the toxicant, or its initial concentration is kept constant. For two agents known to adhere to the Freundlich isotherm, paraldehyde and metaldehyde, a good agreement was obtained between the F and R values predicted by the derived equations and those observed experimentally. The usefulness of F versus R plots is discussed.

Effect of purgatives on antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal

The effects of purgatives on the antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal were studied in seven volunteer subjects. The volunteer subjects were given 1000 mg of aspirin, 100 mg of atenolol and 50 mg of phenylpropanolamine with 100 ml of water on an empty stomach and were assigned randomly to the following treatment groups: after 5 min 150 ml of water, after 5 min 25 g of charcoal, after 5 min charcoal orally with 20 mg of metoclopramide rectally, followed by 10 mg of bisacodyl rectally 3 h afterwards, after 5 min charcoal with 250 ml of magnesium citrate USP and after 60 min charcoal with metoclopramide followed by bisacodyl 3 h thereafter. The plasma concentrations (0-24 h) and the cumulative urinary excretion (0-72 h) of salicylates, atenolol and phenylpropanolamine were measured. Both magnesium citrate and metoclopramide combined with bisacodyl hastened the gastrointestinal transit but magnesium citrate was more effective. Charcoal alone reduced the absorption of aspirin and phenylpropanolamine by about 50% and that of atenolol by about 95%. The purgatives did not modify significantly the efficacy of charcoal. When the antidotal treatment was delayed by 60 min its efficacy was reduced to some extent, possibly depending on the pharmaceutical formulation of the test drugs. The present results do not support the routine use of purgatives in combination with activated charcoal. In some instances, however, their use may promote the evacuation of, for example, depot formulations from the gastrointestinal tract and thus have a beneficial effect together with activated charcoal in reducing absorption.

Does alcohol absorb to activated charcoal?

Activated charcoal seldom is used in pure-alcohol poisoning since it is absorbed rapidly from the gut. Furthermore in early reports activated charcoal was found to adsorb alcohol poorly. However, in 1981 North et al. [North, D. S., Thompson, J. D. & Peterson, C. D. (1981). Am. J. Hosp. Pharm., 38, 864-866] demonstrated in dogs that charcoal given at the same time as alcohol can reduce the blood alcohol concentration significantly. To study whether charcoal is of value in a clinical situation, a randomized cross-over study in two phases was conducted. Each person drank 88 g of alcohol and 30 min after either 20 g of activated charcoal was taken or the same volume of water was drunk. There were no significant differences in plasma alcohol concentrations with or without charcoal.

Activated charcoal in oral ethanol absorption: lack of effect in humans

Activated charcoal has been recommended for use in poisonings by ethanol, other toxic alcohols and glycols, but it has been avoided with therapeutic use of oral ethanol. Six healthy young adults drank a dose of ethanol designed to give a peak concentration of 125 mg/dl on two different days after overnight fasting. Each individual drank the same dose on both occasions; but on one of these days, the subjects drank an aqueous slurry of 60 g of superactive charcoal prior to ethanol ingestion. We compared the pharmacokinetic profile of ethanol with and without activated charcoal treatment. The fraction of ethanol absorbed was similar on both protocols. The mean peak ethanol concentration after pretreatment with activated charcoal was 8% greater than ethanol alone (p = 0.08). Thus oral activated charcoal does not significantly impair ethanol absorption and can be used in patients requiring oral ethanol. Our results do not support the use of activated charcoal in overdose of ethanol alone. Extending our results to poisonings by other toxic alcohols and glycols, the use of activated charcoal to reduce their absorption deserves evaluation.

Effect of charcoal-drug ratio on antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal in man

The effect of charcoal-drug ratio on the antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal was studied in six healthy volunteers in a randomized cross-over study and compared with the adsorption capacity of activated charcoal in vitro. Aminosalicylic acid (PAS) 1 g and 5 g were ingested on an empty stomach in 30 ml of water. Immediately afterwards the subjects ingested 50 g of activated charcoal in 300 ml of water or 300 ml of water only. PAS 10 g 20 g were only given with 50 g of activated charcoal administered immediately afterwards. The plasma concentrations and the cumulative excretion of PAS into urine were measured for 48 h. Increasing the dose of PAS from 1 g to 20 g reduced the antidotal efficacy of activated charcoal: at a charcoal-drug ratio of 50:1 under 5% of the dose was absorbed but at a ratio of 2.5:1 about 37%. These data correlated well to the saturation of adsorption capacity of charcoal in vitro. To minimize the possibility of saturation of the adsorption capacity of charcoal in acute intoxications where the amount and type of drug taken is usually unknown, large doses (50-100 g) of activated charcoal should be used.

Effect of dose of charcoal on the absorption of disopyramide, indomethacin and trimethoprim by man

The efficacy of various charcoal-to-drug ratios for the absorption of drugs was studied in 6 healthy volunteers and in vitro at two pHs. Disopyramide 200 mg, indomethacin 50 mg and trimethoprim 200 mg were ingested on an empty stomach with 100 ml water. After 5 min the subjects ingested a charcoal suspension in 300 ml--2.5 g, 10 g, 25 g or 50 g of Norit A, or 10 g of PX-21, or water 300 ml only. Increasing the dose of activated charcoal from 2.5 g to 50 g reduced the gastrointestinal absorption of disopyramide and indomethacin from 30-40% to 3-5%, and that of trimethoprim from 10% to 1% of the respective controls. Disopyramide and trimethoprim were best adsorbed by charcoal in vitro at neutral and indomethacin at acid pH, but saturation of the adsorption capacity was apparent at charcoal-to-drug ratios less than 7.5. Combining the in vitro and in vivo results it can be concluded that the dose of activated charcoal to be given in acute intoxication should be as large as possible, because the drug history is often unknown.

Does ethanol modify antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal studies in vitro and in experimental animals

The effect of ethanol on the adsorption of strychnine to activated charcoal was studied in vitro at pH 1.2 and 7.0. At high charcoal-drug ratios the adsorption of strychnine was significantly (p less than 0.001) more complete at neutral pH than at pH 1.2. At these ratios ethanol 10% increased (p less than 0.001) the unadsorbed fractions at both pHs. The acute toxicity of oral strychnine in mice was not influenced by ethanol. Activated charcoal (1000 mg/kg) mixed with strychnine prior to the administration increased its LD50 by 410 fold. When ethanol was administered with charcoal and strychnine, the increase in the LD50 was only 220 fold which is significantly (p less than 0.05) less than without ethanol. Accordingly, the concomitant ingestion of ethanol in drug intoxications may slightly impair the antidotal efficacy of oral activated charcoal. Despite this potential reduction of the antidotal efficacy of charcoal in some extreme situations, there should be no hesitation in administering activated charcoal in acute intoxications since it in any case very effectively inhibits the absorption of most drugs.

Activated charcoal and syrup of ipecac in prevention of cimetidine and pindolol absorption in man after administration of metoclopramide as an antiemetic agent

The effects of activated charcoal and ipecac syrup by mouth on cimetidine and pindolol absorption were studied in seven subjects, who had ingested 20 mg metoclopramide 1 h earlier, and compared with the adsorption capacity of charcoal in vitro. Activated charcoal, 50 g, given 5 min after 400 mg cimetidine + 10 mg pindolol, reduced their absorption by 99% or more, based on AUC0-48h and the 48-h urinary excretion of the drugs. Syrup of ipecac caused emesis on each occasion. On the average, ipecac reduced the absorption of cimetidine and pindolol by 75% and 60%, respectively. Based on studies in vitro it seems probable that the adsorbing capacity of charcoal for cimetidine but not for pindolol will be saturated if 50 g charcoal is given after an overdose of about 100 fold the therapeutic dose. Because the use of ipecac allowed an absorption of the drugs at least 30 fold that allowed by charcoal, the immediate administration of activated charcoal, without preceding lavage or emesis, should be considered in such poisonings where the adsorption capacity of high charcoal doses will not be saturated.