Studies on the Interaction between Formoterol and Salmeterol in Guinea-Pig Tracheain Vitro

Asthma and COPD: A Focus on β-Agonists - Past, Present and Future

Asthma has been recognised as a respiratory disorder for millennia and the focus of targeted drug development for the last 120 years. Asthma is one of the most common chronic non-communicable diseases worldwide. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, is caused by exposure to tobacco smoke and other noxious particles and exerts a substantial economic and social burden. This chapter reviews the development of the treatments of asthma and COPD particularly focussing on the β-agonists, from the isolation of adrenaline, through the development of generations of short- and long-acting β-agonists. It reviews asthma death epidemics, considers the intrinsic efficacy of clinical compounds, and charts the improvement in selectivity and duration of action that has led to our current medications. Important β2-agonist compounds no longer used are considered, including some with additional properties, and how the different pharmacological properties of current β2-agonists underpin their different places in treatment guidelines. Finally, it concludes with a look forward to future developments that could improve the β-agonists still further, including extending their availability to areas of the world with less readily accessible healthcare.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of formoterol versus salmeterol in the treatment of patients with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Formoterol and salmeterol are two long-acting β2-agonists given by inhalation, with bronchodilating effects lasting for at least 12 h after a single administration. Formoterol has a faster onset of action compared with salmeterol. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the data published from previous review in order to calculate pooled estimates of effectiveness and safety assessment of formoterol and salmeterol in treatment of patients with asthma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we conducted an electronic search for medical citation databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and IranMedex. Besides manual search of the databases that record randomized clinical trials, conference proceedings, and journals related to asthma were included. Studies were evaluated by two independent people based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the common outcomes of studies were entered into the RevMan 5.0.1 software, after evaluation of studies and extraction of data from them; and in cases where there were homogeneous studies, meta-analysis was performed, and for heterogeneous studies, the results were reported qualitatively.

RESULTS

Of the 1539 studies initially found, 13 were included in the study. According to the meta-analysis conducted, no significant difference was found between the inhalation of formoterol 12 μg and salmeterol 50 μg in the two outcomes of mean forced expiratory volume 1 s (FEV1), 12 h after inhalation of medication and Borg score (A frequently used scale for quantifying breathlessness) after inhalation of medication. In addition, salmeterol was more effective than formoterol in the two outcomes of percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of methacholine and the number of days without an attack. Since the two outcomes of FEV1 30-60 min after inhalation of medication and morning peak expiratory flow after inhalation of medication were heterogeneous, they had no meta-analysis capabilities, and its results were reported qualitatively.

CONCLUSION

The data from included studies shows that, more efficacy has been achieved with Salmeterol, especially in some outcomes such as the percent decrease in FEV1 after inhalation of Methacholine, and the number of days without an attack; and therefore, the administration of Salmeterol seems to be beneficial for patients, compared with Formoterol.

Pharmacological characterization of abediterol, a novel inhaled β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist with long duration of action and a favorable safety profile in preclinical models

Abediterol is a novel potent, long-acting inhaled β(2)-adrenoceptor agonist in development for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Abediterol shows subnanomolar affinity for the human β(2)-adrenoceptor and a functional selectivity over β(1)-adrenoceptors higher than that of formoterol and indacaterol in both a cellular model with overexpressed human receptors and isolated guinea pig tissue. Abediterol is a full agonist at the human β(2)-adrenoceptor (E(max) = 91 ± 5% of the maximal effect of isoprenaline). The potency and onset of action that abediterol shows in isolated human bronchi (EC(50) = 1.9 ± 0.4 nM; t½ onset = 7-10 min) is not significantly different from that of formoterol, but its duration of action (t½ ∼ 690 min) is similar to that of indacaterol. Nebulized abediterol inhibits acetylcholine-induced bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs in a concentration-dependent manner, with higher potency and longer duration of action (t½ = 36 h) than salmeterol (t½ = 6 h) and formoterol (t½ = 4 h) and similar duration of action to indacaterol up to 48 h. In dogs, the bronchoprotective effect of abediterol is more sustained than that of salmeterol and indacaterol at doses without effects on heart rate, thus showing a greater safety margin (defined as the ratio of dose increasing heart rate by 5% and dose inhibiting bronchospasm by 50%) than salmeterol, formoterol, and indacaterol (5.6 versus 3.3, 2.2, and 0.3, respectively). In conclusion, our results suggest that abediterol has a preclinical profile for once-daily dosing in humans together with a fast onset of action and a favorable cardiovascular safety profile.

Controversies regarding long-acting β2-agonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines the literature regarding the efficacy and safety of long-acting β2-agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2009 guidelines and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 2007 asthma guidelines recommend adding long-acting β2-agonists to patients inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids. These recommendations must be balanced against published data which demonstrate a signal of increased morbidity and mortality with use of long-acting β2-agonists. These conflicting data raise the question of whether or not there may be genotypic or phenotypic discriminators leading to disparate responses to long-acting β2-agonists.

SUMMARY

The combination of long-acting β2-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids demonstrates improvement in asthma control and exacerbation rates; however, long-acting β2-agonists are not recommended for use as monotherapy or without optimization of inhaled corticosteroid dose. Although the majority of asthmatic patients appear to benefit from the addition of long-acting β2-agonists, there are concerns that a small proportion of patients, including steroid-naïve patients and African Americans, may not obtain such benefits. Thus far, studies have not clearly demonstrated genotypic or phenotypic differences explaining the variability in response.

Treatment with budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma: a focus on patient-reported outcomes

In the United States, budesonide/formoterol pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) is approved for treatment of asthma in patients aged ≥12 years whose asthma is not adequately controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or whose disease severity clearly warrants treatment with an ICS and a long-acting β₂-adrenergic agonist. This article reviews studies of budesonide/formoterol pMDI in patients with persistent asthma, with a particular focus on patient-reported outcomes (eg, perceived onset of effect, patient satisfaction with treatment, health-related quality of life [HRQL], global assessments, sleep quality and quantity), as these measures reflect patient perceptions of asthma control and disease burden. A search of PubMed and respiratory meetings was performed to identify relevant studies. In two pivotal budesonide/formoterol pMDI studies in adolescents and adults, greater efficacy and similar tolerability were shown with budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160/9 μg and 320/9 μg twice daily versus its monocomponents or placebo. In those studies, improvements in HRQL, patient satisfaction, global assessments of asthma control, and quality of sleep also favored budesonide/formoterol pMDI compared with one or both of its monocomponents or placebo. Budesonide/formoterol pMDI has a rapid onset of effect (within 15 minutes) that patients can feel, an attribute that may have benefits for treatment adherence. In summary, budesonide/formoterol pMDI is effective and well tolerated and has additional therapeutic benefits that may be important from the patient’s perspective.

Role of long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists in asthma management based on updated asthma guidelines

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines the role of long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists in the management of asthma, particularly focusing on recommendations in the newly revised Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) asthma guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

GINA guidelines recommend increasing inhaled corticosteroid doses in all children with asthma not controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids before adding a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist, whereas NHLBI guidelines have different age-based recommendations for children. In patients younger than 5 years, NHLBI guidelines recommend increasing the inhaled corticosteroid dose before adding a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist; in children aged 5-11 years, equal weight is given to increasing the inhaled corticosteroid dose or including add-on therapy to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. In adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older, GINA recommends adding long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids over increasing the inhaled corticosteroid dose. NHLBI guidelines give equal weight to these choices, with alternative, although not preferred, therapies including the addition of theophylline, zileuton, or leukotriene receptor antagonists to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

SUMMARY

In the recently updated GINA and NHLBI asthma guidelines, long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists are an important class of agents for the management of persistent asthma in patients whose asthma is not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy.

Systemic administration of beta2-adrenoceptor agonists, formoterol and salmeterol, elicit skeletal muscle hypertrophy in rats at micromolar doses

beta(2)-Adrenoceptor agonists provide a potential therapy for muscle wasting and weakness, but their use may be limited by adverse effects on the heart, mediated in part, by beta(1)-adrenoceptor activation. Two beta(2)-agonists, formoterol and salmeterol, are approved for treating asthma and have an extended duration of action and increased safety, associated with greater beta(2)-adrenoceptor selectivity. The pharmacological profiles of formoterol and salmeterol and their effects on skeletal and cardiac muscle mass were investigated in 12-week-old, male F344 rats. Formoterol and salmeterol were each administered via daily i.p. injection at one of seven doses (ranging from 1 to 2,000 microg kg(-1) day(-1)), for 4 weeks. Rats were anaesthetised and the EDL and soleus muscles and the heart were excised and weighed. Dose-response curves were constructed based on skeletal and cardiac muscle hypertrophy. Formoterol was more potent than salmeterol, with a significantly lower ED(50) in EDL muscles (1 and 130 microg kg(-1) day(-1), P <0.05), whereas salmeterol had greater intrinsic activity than formoterol in both EDL and soleus muscles (12% greater hypertrophy than formoterol). The drugs had similar potency and intrinsic activity in the heart, with a smaller leftward shift for formoterol than seen in skeletal muscle. A dose of 25 microg kg(-1) day(-1) of formoterol elicited greater EDL and soleus hypertrophy than salmeterol, but resulted in similar beta-adrenoceptor downregulation. These results show that doses as low as 1 microg kg(-1) day(-1) of formoterol can elicit significant muscle hypertrophy with minimal cardiac hypertrophy and provide important information regarding the potential therapeutic use of formoterol and salmeterol for muscle wasting.

The use of inhaled formoterol in the treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the clinical efficacy and safety of formoterol when used to relieve symptoms of asthma and prevent exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search was performed for articles published between 1997 and 2005 with the keywords formoterol, asthma, and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist, with cross-referencing to identify peer-reviewed journal articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Published articles on the clinical use of formoterol for asthma or EIB were included as well as articles detailing the pharmacologic properties of the drug. To present a thorough review of the literature, published studies based on patient number, study design, or other measures of study quality were not excluded.

RESULTS

Formoterol is the only long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist that combines a rapid onset of action (within 3 minutes) with a long duration of effect (approximately 12 hours). Clinically, as recommended by asthma treatment guidelines, formoterol in conjunction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is a preferred treatment for moderate to severe persistent asthma. Significant clinical data support the use of formoterol in combination with ICSs for the treatment of asthma, with studies demonstrating improved pulmonary function and symptom scores and decreased need for maintenance ICSs and short-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (SABAs) as relief medication. Recent studies also demonstrate that use of formoterol as needed as relief medication is associated with a prolonged time to exacerbation, improved pulmonary function, and decreased asthma symptoms. When used as monotherapy, formoterol provides protection against EIB. Clinical data also demonstrate that formoterol is safe and well tolerated even in high doses, with an adverse event profile similar to that of SABAs.

CONCLUSION

Overall, formoterol is safe and effective as adjunct controller therapy for moderate and severe persistent asthma and as monotherapy for EIB.

Long-acting beta2-agonists in asthma: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews

According to major asthma management guidelines, long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs) should be used only when asthma remains symptomatic in patients already receiving regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). A large Cochrane systematic review provides evidence that LABAs are safe and beneficial in control of asthma; sub-group analyses indicating that this is true when ICSs are used and in their absence. Two other Cochrane systematic reviews have found that LABAs are more effective than regular short-acting beta2-agonists, and are as effective as theophylline with fewer side-effects. These reviews support guidelines in the use of LABA as additional therapy when asthma is inadequately controlled by ICS at moderate dose. However, guidelines may be too conservative, and more studies in stable mild asthma comparing their use and safety with placebo and ICS are required.

Formoterol 12 microg BID administered via single-dose dry powder inhaler in adults with asthma suboptimally controlled with salmeterol or on-demand salbutamol: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

Although salmeterol and formoterol are both long-acting beta(2) adrenergic receptor agonist bronchodilators, there are distinct differences between them that could translate into differences in clinical response in some patients.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of formoterol in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma that was suboptimally controlled with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combined with on-demand salbutamol (albuterol in the United States) with or without salmeterol.

METHODS

This multicenter, 4-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study included adult patients (age >/=18 years) with suboptimally controlled asthma (mean salbutamol use, >/=2 puffs/d via pressurized metered-dose inhaler [100 microg/puff]). Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive formoterol 12 microg BID via single-dose dry powder inhaler plus on-demand salbutamol or to continue their existing treatment with either on-demand salbutamol alone or salmeterol 50 microg BID via multidose dry powder inhaler plus on-demand salbutamol. ICS regimens were unchanged during the trial. The primary efficacy variable was evening predose peak expiratory flow (PEF). Secondary variables included further measures of asthma symptom control.

RESULTS

A total of 6239 adult patients entered the study; data from 6155 patients were available for analysis. Patients who were switched from salmeterol to formoterol reported a significant increase in mean (SD) evening predose PEF compared with patients who continued their existing treatment (402.9 [112.1] vs 385.5 [107.5] Umin, respectively; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who were switched from on-demand salbutamol alone to formoterol plus on-demand salbutamol reported a significant increase in mean evening predose PEF compared with those who continued treatment with on-demand salbutamol alone (409.3 [105.6] vs 385.0 [105.3] L/min, respectively; P < 0.001). The results for the secondary efficacy measures mirrored the significant improvements seen in patients switched to formoterol compared with those who continued to receive on-demand salbutamol alone or salmeterol plus on-demand salbutamol.

CONCLUSION

In this study, formoterol significantly improved lung function and control of asthma symptoms and decreased use of rescue medication in patients whose asthma had been suboptimally controlled with an ICS in combination with on-demand salbutamol with or without salmeterol.

The long and short of beta2-agonists

For patients whose asthma is not adequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy alone, increasing the dose of ICS or the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-agonist is recommended. Greater improvements in lung function are achieved with the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to ICS therapy, rather than doubling the dose of ICS. Formoterol and salmeterol have a similarly long duration of effect (up to 12 h). However, as a result of their different chemical structures, there are marked pharmacological differences in the mechanism of action which affect their speeds of onset. These differences amount to a more rapid onset of effect for formoterol compared with salmeterol. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists appear to be well tolerated at elevated doses. These two features (tolerability at high doses and rapid onset of effect) support the use of formoterol as a reliever medication in addition to use in maintenance therapy. The long-acting beta(2)-agonists can be considered as beneficial additions to ICS therapy for the management of moderate-to-severe asthma.

Comparison of the effects of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Several studies have demonstrated the superiority of salmeterol and formoterol to either regular treatment with albuterol or placebo. However, to date there have been no trials comparing the efficacy of salmeterol and formoterol in patients with severe asthma.

DESIGN

We undertook a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study to compare 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice daily) or salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) in patients with severe asthma whose conditions were not being adequately controlled by therapy with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (i.e., > or = 1,500 microg daily) or with regular oral corticosteroid treatment. Morning pretreatment peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last 14 days of the treatment period was the primary outcome variable. Patients recorded morning and evening pretreatment PEF, daytime and nighttime symptom scores, and any use of rescue medication. Spirometry and bronchial reversibility were performed after each treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-two nonsmoking patients (29 women; mean age, 45 +/- 2 years; mean [+/- SEM] FEV(1), 61.8 +/- 3.4% of predicted) took part in the trial, and 27 patients completed the trial. The mean morning PEF was greater in patients receiving formoterol (mean increase, 14.4 L/min; 95% confidence interval [CI]. 0.2 to 28.6) or salmeterol (mean increase, 14.8 L/min; 95% CI, 0.5 to 29.1) compared with those receiving placebo, but there was no difference between these treatments. There were no significant treatment effects for any of the secondary outcome variables (i.e., FEV(1,) FVC, mean evening PEF, mean daytime symptom score, or nighttime symptom score).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the long-acting beta(2)-agonists salmeterol and formoterol improve morning PEF in patients with severe asthma, but that there is no difference in efficacy between the two drugs.

Bronchodilating properties of the VIP receptor agonist Ro 25-1553 compared to those of formoterol on the guinea-pig isolated trachea

Ro 25-1553 is a 31-amino acid analogue of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and has recently been shown to be highly selective for the VPAC(2)-receptor. The bronchodilating property of this compound was evaluated in vitro on preparations of guinea-pig trachea, with the long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor selective agonist, formoterol, as a reference. In strip-preparations precontracted with carbachol, Ro 25-1553 caused a concentration-dependent and complete relaxation of the tracheal smooth muscle. Ro 25-1553 was 3-7 times less potent than formoterol on a molar basis, but the efficacy was comparable with that of formoterol. Both compounds showed a rapid onset of action and a similar durability of effect. Ro 25-1553 appeared to interact with formoterol as well as with salmeterol in an additive way. In vagus nerve-trachea tube preparations, when added to the external medium, Ro 25-1553 concentration-dependently and completely inhibited nerve-induced contractions. This occurred in the same concentration range as needed for relaxation of precontracted strips. Ro 25-1553 was active also when administered into the tracheal lumen albeit the concentration had to be increased. The present study supports and extends previous results suggesting that Ro 25-1553 may be a powerful alternative to the beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists which prevail today.

Comparison of the anti-bronchoconstrictor activities of inhaled formoterol, its (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomers and salmeterol in the rhesus monkey

The principle objective of this study was to define the anti-bronchoconstrictor effects of inhaled racemic formoterol and its (R,R)- and (S,S)-enantiomers in a new model of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in the rhesus monkey. A second long-acting beta(2)agonist, salmeterol, was included for comparison. Anaesthetized, spontaneously breathing rhesus monkeys were set up for measuring airway resistance. Blood pressure, heart rate and serum potassium concentrations were measured concomitantly to gauge systemic exposure and the potential for side effects. Formoterol, 0.14, 0.34 and 1.15 microg/kg, administered by aerosol, induced rapidly developing, sustained, dose-related inhibition of the bronchoconstrictor responses to aerosolised methacholine (maximum 76%) accompanied by sustained, dose-related tachycardia. (R,R)-formoterol, 0.56 microg/kg, induced anti-bronconstrictor effects and an associated tachycardia which corresponded closely to the effects seen following twice the dose of the racemate. (S,S)-formoterol, 0.54 microg/kg, was inactive. Salmeterol, 1.4 microg/kg, had no significant anti-bronchoconstrictor effect whereas doses of 5.5 and 30 microg/kg produced quantitatively similar but submaximal anti-bronchoconstrictor effects (maximum 47%). Sustained dose-dependent tachycardia was seen with salmeterol over the full dose range. Thus, the anti-bronchoconstrictor activity of formoterol resides in the (R,R) enantiomer and the (S,S) enantiomer does not interfere with the activity when present in the racemic form. Furthermore, the data indicate that the present model of methacholine-induced bronchospasm in the rhesus monkey could be useful in defining the key properties of beta(2)agonist bronchodilators such as relative potency, efficacy, duration of action and potential for systemic side effects.

Onset of bronchodilation of budesonide/formoterol vs. salmeterol/fluticasone in single inhalers

Combinations of inhaled glucocorticoids and long-acting beta2-agonists in the same inhaler device have become available in recent years. In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and crossover study we have evaluated the onset of action of budesonide and formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort Turbuhaler) and that of the fixed combination of salmeterol and fluticasone (Seretide Diskus). Thirty patients with a mean FEV1 of 2.54 l (range: 1.48-4.28) and a mean inclusion reversibility in FEV1 of 19.1% were included. Single doses of budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg and 2x (160/4.5) microg, salmeterol/fluticasone 50/250 microg, or placebo were given. Serial measurements of FEV1 were performed over 3 h. The combination of one or two inhalations of budesonide/formoterol showed a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone, both evaluated as mean FEV1 at 3 min (2.74, 2.75 and 2.56 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol), or as average FEV1 from 0 to 15 min (2.80, 2.83 and 2.67 l respectively P<0.001 for both doses of budesonide/formoterol). For placebo, mean FEV1 at 3 min was 2.46 l, and the average FEV1 at 0-15 min was 2.50 l. Furthermore, budesonide/formoterol at both doses resulted in higher FEV1 than salmeterol/fluticasone at 3 h. We conclude that the combination of budesonide/formoterol has a faster onset of action than salmeterol/fluticasone.

Comparison of the relative efficacy of formoterol and salmeterol in asthmatic patients

Studies performed on airway smooth muscle in vitro have indicated that salmeterol is a partial agonist on the beta2-receptor in comparison to formoterol. In the present study we evaluated whether these pharmacological differences between salmeterol and formoterol also are applicable to asthmatic patients. The protective effects by increasing cumulative doses of formoterol (12, 60, 120 micrograms) and salmeterol (50, 250, 500 micrograms) on methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction were evaluated in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled design. Patients were regularly treated with salbutamol 200 micrograms twice daily during the study period, to avoid variability in beta2-adrenoceptor tolerance. S-potassium, heart rate corrected Q-T interval (Q-Tc), and tremor score were followed as measures of systemic effects. Formoterol dose-dependently protected against methacholine responsiveness (4.6 doubling doses after 120 micrograms). Salmeterol, however, showed a flatter dose-response curve, and a significantly weaker maximal protective effect (2.8 doubling doses after 250 micrograms). Formoterol caused a significantly higher tremor score and a larger drop in S-potassium than salmeterol at the highest doses. These data show that salmeterol is a partial agonist on the beta2-receptor in relation to formoterol in human airways in vivo. Further studies are required to document the clinical consequences of this finding, for example in severe asthmatic patients.

Differential effect of formoterol on adenosine monophosphate and histamine reactivity in asthma

Short-acting beta2-agonists provide greater protection against bronchoconstriction induced by adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) than by direct-acting bronchoconstrictors such as histamine and methacholine. AMP is thought to cause bronchoconstriction via release of mediators from mast cells, which suggests that these drugs stabilize mast cells in vivo. This in vivo property has not yet been demonstrated for long-acting beta2-agonists. We undertook a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to investigate the effects of a single dose of formoterol inhaled via Turbuhaler (12 micrograms) and of albuterol inhaled via Turbuhaler (200 micrograms) on airway responsiveness to AMP and histamine in 16 subjects with mild atopic asthma. Albuterol reduced airway responsiveness to AMP and histamine by 4.1 +/- 0.5 and 3.5 +/- 0.4 doubling doses, respectively. In contrast, formoterol caused a greater protective effect against AMP than against histamine challenge, decreasing airway responsiveness by 6.0 +/- 0.8 and 4.2 +/- 0.4 doubling doses, respectively (p < 0.05). Thus, the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol appears to have a mast cell-stabilizing effect in vivo in mild asthma.

Some pharmacodynamic aspects on long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists

1. Formoterol and salmeterol are the first members of a new generation of long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists for inhalation. The discovery of the long effect duration of formoterol was made by chance, while the development of salmeterol appeared to follow a purposeful research strategy. 2. Preclinical evaluation predictive of the clinical duration of effect of long-acting bronchodilators is not straightforward. Experiments in vitro may give false positive results, while experiments in vivo may show false negative results. 3. Once the principle of a long duration of effect was established, a number of novel long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists of various chemical structure have emerged. 4. There are two alternative models for the explanation of the long duration of effect: the exosite binding explaining the mode of action of salmeterol, and the more general diffusion microkinetic model applicable for both formoterol and salmeterol. 5. Long-acting beta-adrenoceptor agonists with a relatively low efficacy like salmeterol may, under certain circumstances, inhibit competitively the relaxing effect of agonists with higher efficacy like formoterol and salbutamol. 6. Like all other beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists in current clinical use, formoterol and salmeterol comprise racemic mixtures. Only the RR- and R-enantiomers are pharmacologically active. The experimental compounds TA-2005 and picumeterol have been developed as pure RR- and R-enantiomers, respectively.

Steric aspects of formoterol and terbutaline: is there an adverse effect of the distomer on airway smooth muscle function?

Experiments were made on isolated tissues from guinea-pig to test the hypothesis that the distomers of rac-beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists induce airway hyperreactivity. Tracheal strip preparations were contracted with carbachol. Both rac- and (R;R)-formoterol (2 and 1 mumol/l, respectively) produced an immediate relaxation, followed by a slow recovery of tone. (S;S)-Formoterol (2 mumol/l) had no effect on smooth muscle tone. Similar results were obtained with the enantiomers of terbutaline. In other strip preparations of the trachea or the main bronchi, cholinergic or nonadrenergic/noncholinergic (NANC) excitatory responses were evoked by electrical field-stimulation. The eutomers, (R;R)-formoterol and (R)-terbutaline, inhibited concentration-dependently both cholinergic and NANC-induced contractions. The distomers, (S;S)-formoterol and (S)-terbutaline, showed qualitatively the same effects but were about 1,000 times less potent than the corresponding eutomer. In a third series of experiments, either enantiomer of formoterol was administered to an electrically stimulated vagus nerve-trachea tube preparation. The nerve-induced contractions were inhibited by both enantiomers, but (S;S)-formoterol was about 1,000 times less potent than (R;R)-formoterol. For both enantiomers of formoterol, about tenfold higher concentrations was required to obtain the same degree of inhibition when given intratracheally as compared with administration in the external medium. There was no indication in any of the experimental approaches that (S;S)-formoterol or (S)-terbutaline might enhance the response to cholinergic or NANC-related stimuli.

Airway effects of salmeterol in healthy individuals

The long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol has been shown in several in vitro studies to produce non-beta-mediated relaxant effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these effects have any relevance in humans in vivo. Thirteen healthy individuals were studied in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study on five separate days. The subjects were pre-treated orally with either propranolol 400 mg in order to block beta-adrenoceptor mediated effects or placebo. Two hours after drug intake, three increasing doses of salmeterol (25 + 50 + 100 micrograms), salbutamol (100 + 200 + 400 micrograms) or placebo were given from matched meter dose inhalers at 1-h intervals between doses. Specific airway conductance (sGAW) was measured in a body plethysmograph at the beginning of the experiment and 30 and 60 min after each inhaled dose of the beta-agonists. Salmeterol and salbutamol produced the same maximal increase in sGAW and had the same area under the dose-response curves. Pre-treatment with propranolol totally inhibited the effect of both drugs. In conclusion, salmeterol at clinically used doses did not produce any non-beta-mediated bronchodilating effect in normal individuals, measured as sGAW. Salmeterol and salbutamol showed the same efficacy but salmeterol was four times more potent than salbutamol.

Different effects of salmeterol, formoterol and salbutamol on cholinergic responses in the ferret trachea

1. In the present study, the inhibitory effects of the selective beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists, salmeterol, formoterol and salbutamol, have been investigated on contractions of ferret trachea induced both by endogenous and exogenous acetylcholine. The aim of the study was to evaluate quantitative and/or qualitative differences in response which may indicate both pre- and post-junctional sites of action. The non-selective beta-antagonist, sotalol, was used to estimate beta-adrenoceptor involvement. 2. Isometric tension was measured in ferret isolated tracheal strips. The inhibitory effects of the drugs were studied on tonic contractions induced by pre-junctional activation with electrical field stimulation (EFS) (2 Hz, 700 mA) or post-junctional activation with exogenous acetylcholine (ACh) (0.5 microM, about EC80), giving a similar degree of smooth muscle response. 3. Concentration-response experiments were performed with formoterol (0.3 nM-0.3 microM) and salmeterol and salbutamol (10 nM-10 microM). The experiments ended with the addition of sotalol (10 microM). 4. All three beta-agonists inhibited the contractions in a concentration-dependent manner. Salbutamol, formoterol and salmeterol inhibited the EFS-induced contractions by 66(8)%, 105(5)% and 103(8)% (mean(s.e. mean)) respectively. ACh-induced contractions were inhibited by 37(6)%, 72(11)% and 33(8)%. Theophylline (10 nM-3 mM) inhibited the contractions to the same degree. 5. beta-Adrenoceptor blockade by sotalol significantly antagonized the inhibitory effects of salbutamol and formoterol on both EFS- and ACh-induced contractions. The effect of salmeterol on ACh-induced contraction was also significantly antagonized, whereas the inhibition of EFS-induced contraction was virtually unaffected. 6. In conclusion, salbutamol, salmeterol and formoterol produced greater inhibitory effects in preparations contracted by EFS than in preparations contracted by exogenously-added ACh. In the case of formoterol and salbutamol, the effects on both levels are most probably due to beta-adrenoceptor stimulation, whereas for salmeterol the dominant pre-junctional effect is probably not mediated via beta-adrenoceptors. This non-beta-mediated effect could represent an additional relaxant mechanism for salmeterol.

The interaction between salmeterol and beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists with higher efficacy on guinea-pig trachea and human bronchus in vitro

1. In guinea-pig tracheal preparations precontracted with 1 mumol l-1 carbachol, formoterol, procaterol, fenoterol, salmefamol, salbutamol and terbutaline (in that order of potency) caused a concentration-dependent and almost complete, relaxation. However, under these conditions, the maximum relaxation by salmeterol was approximately 30% of the maximum attainable relaxation. 2. We have therefore explored the ability of salmeterol to inhibit the relaxant response to beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists of different chemical structure and relatively higher efficacy in smooth muscle preparations from guinea-pig trachea and human bronchus. 3. With 1 mumol l-1 salmeterol in the organ bath, the concentration-effect curves for the other agonists were shifted to the right in a variable way by 1.8-2.8 log units, fenoterol and salbutamol being the extremes. 4. When 20 mumol l-1 sulfonterol, another low efficacy beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, was substituted for salmeterol, the difference in the magnitude of the rightward shift between fenoterol and salbutamol was eliminated. 5. In the human bronchus, formoterol and terbutaline had a higher apparent efficacy than salmeterol. With 1 mumol l-1 salmeterol in the organ bath, the concentration-effect curve for formoterol was shifted 2.7 log units to the right. 6. Salmeterol inhibits, competitively, relaxant responses to beta 2-adrenoceptor agonists with higher efficacy. The degree of inhibition seems to be dependent on the agonist used. This contrasts with results obtained with sulfonterol and suggests that salmeterol interacts with the beta 2-adrenoceptor in a complex way.

Salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol in the isolated guinea pig trachea: differences in maximum relaxant effect and potency but not in functional antagonism

BACKGROUND

Formoterol and salmeterol are new long acting beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists. The maximum relaxant effect, potency and functional antagonism against carbachol induced contraction for salmeterol, formoterol and salbutamol have been compared in the guinea pig isolated trachea. In addition, the possibility of inducing a non-beta adrenoceptor mediated relaxation by salmeterol was studied.

METHODS

Concentration response experiments were conducted with isolated tracheal preparations (n = 4-6 in all experiments), precontracted by carbachol to cause either 40% (60 nmol/l), 80% (0.3 mumol/l) or 100% (3 mumol/l, supramaximal) of the maximum contraction. Each beta agonist was added cumulatively at each level of precontraction. Additional cumulative concentration response experiments were conducted for salmeterol alone at the highest level of precontraction, with and without beta blockade by sotalol (1 mmol/l). With the drug concentrations which produced the maximum response and the highest level of precontraction, the relaxation of formoterol (10 nmol/l) and salmeterol (1 mumol/l) was also compared non-cumulatively. Finally, with the corresponding drug concentrations and precontraction, the relaxant effect was compared for formoterol (10 nmol/l) in salmeterol relaxed airways with that of salmeterol (1 mumol/l) in formoterol relaxed airways.

RESULTS

The increase in carbachol concentration from 60 nmol/l to 3 mumol/l induced a rightward shift in the mean (SE) concentration (log steps) causing 50% maximum relaxation for salmeterol (0.73 (0.17)), formoterol (0.85 (0.18)), and salbutamol (1.13 (0.11)). Significant differences in the maximum relaxant effect were shown at the highest level of precontraction only, with a remaining active tension of percentage precontraction of 27% (4%) for 1 mumol/l salbutamol and 35% (3%) for 10 nmol/l formoterol compared with 50% (2%) for 1 mumol/l salmeterol. The rank order of potency was: formoterol > salbutamol approximately salmeterol at all levels of precontraction (-log EC50: 9.32 (0.05) for formoterol, 7.82 (0.08) for salbutamol, and 7.50 (0.13) for salmeterol at 80% maximum precontraction). Beta blockade by sotalol (1 mmol/l) significantly inhibited the relaxation induced by salmeterol (1 mumol/l) (remaining active tension: 104% (1%) v 71% (11%) of precontraction) but not the relaxation induced by salmeterol (10 mumol/l) (remaining active tension: 75% (5%) v 71% (12%) of precontraction). In the non-cumulative experiments, formoterol displayed more relaxant effect than salmeterol (remaining active tension: 51% (6%) v 65% (6%) of precontraction). Finally, formoterol significantly relaxed salmeterol relaxed airways (relaxant effect: 22% (8%) of precontraction) whereas there was no significant response to salmeterol in formoterol relaxed airways (relaxant effect: 5% (12%) of precontraction).

CONCLUSIONS

In the guinea pig isolated trachea, formoterol and salbutamol produce more relaxant effect than salmeterol, suggesting that salmeterol is a partial beta 2 agonist. Very high concentrations of salmeterol may induce non-beta adrenoceptor mediated relaxation. Formoterol is more potent than both salbutamol and salmeterol. There is no pronounced difference in the magnitude of antagonism against carbachol induced contractions between salmeterol, formoterol, and salbutamol.

Long acting inhaled beta-adrenoceptor agonists the comparative pharmacology of formoterol and salmeterol

Formoterol and salmeterol are chemically distinct, highly selective beta-2-adrenoceptor agonists developed to provide sustained (12h+) relief of airway obstruction in diseases such as asthma. Despite their similar long duration of action, these drugs differ. Formoterol has a faster onset of action in both experimental and clinical tests than that of salmeterol. Salmeterol, but not formoterol, behaves as a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist in some experimental models due to its considerably weaker efficacy at the beta 2-adrenoceptor in vitro although their are no established clinical consequences of this antagonism. Both formoterol and salmeterol display a peculiar "reassertion" behaviour in isolated airway smooth muscle subjected to beta-adrenoceptor antagonism and then washed with antagonist-free buffer. Both formoterol and salmeterol are highly efficient inhibitors of a number of indices of acute inflammatory processes in cells and tissues of human or animal origin. However, neither of these drugs has a proven clinical anti-inflammatory effect in chronic asthma in humans. Surprisingly, recent biophysical studies of formoterol and salmeterol have provided strong evidence that their individual patterns of onset speed, duration of action and "reassertion" are due to a common drug-lipid membrane interaction rather than drug-adrenoceptor interactions. A membrane-drug diffusion microkinetic model is presented to describe these phenomena.