Effects of water temperature on photosensitization in bath-PUVA therapy with 8-methoxypsoralen

[Investigation of the actual conditions of users of a home-visiting bathing service based on the long-term care insurance care ranking and factors affecting the judgment of bathing possibility]

AIM

In home-visiting bathing services (HVBs), a nurse's role is to evaluate the vital signs, judge bathing possibilities and provide treatment before/after bathing. There are no guidelines regarding specific physical criteria for judging the bathing possibility. However, the body condition of HVB users during bathing has not been investigated. Thus, the present study aimed to clarify users' actual conditions and the factors related to the judgment of the possibility of bathing.

METHODS

An anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey of HVBs users was conducted by Company-A, which provides HVBs. Six hundred sixty responses were collected (response rate: 40.1%).We described the conditions of HVB users and used chi-squared tests and logistic regression analyses to confirm the factors, including the certified Long-term Care Insurance (LTCI) care rank, past medical history and physical conditions that were associated with aborted HVB experiences.

RESULTS

The mean age of the care-recipients was 82.1±12.1 and 93.3% of the recipients had severe conditions, including conditions necessitation the use of medical equipment, pressure ulcers, and contracture. The logistic regression analysis showed that the LTCI-certified-care-rank, the presence of pain, and the need for treatment before bathing were significant factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that users of HVBs not only had high LTCI-certified-care ranks, but that they also required pain management and pre-bathing treatment.

Erythema action spectrum of topical 8-methoxypsoralen-sensitized skin re-evaluated: implications for routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Published methodology used to determine psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) erythemal action spectrum does not reflect current clinical practice for psoralen sensitization. We re-evaluated the PUVA action spectrum using aqueous 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) 2·6 mg L(-1) as used routinely in current clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the UVA erythema action spectrum of topical 8-MOP-sensitized normal skin.

METHODS

Twenty healthy volunteers with skin phototypes I-V were recruited. Forearms were psoralen-sensitized at 37 °C for 10 min. Six UVA irradiations at 10-nm intervals between 325 and 375 nm were randomly allocated to forearm sites and were applied using a 10-nm bandwidth irradiation monochromator. The visual minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) was recorded on each site at 96 h.

RESULTS

Volunteer Boston phototypes were: I, n = 2; II, n = 6; III, n = 6; IV, n = 5 and V, n = 1. The mean MPD (J cm(-2) ) for all subjects at each wavelength was as follows: 325 nm, 0·64 (SD 0·37); 335 nm, 0·80 (SD 0·58); 345 nm, 0·96 (SD 0·55); 355 nm, 1·50 (SD 0·85); 365 nm, 2·19 (SD 0·90); and 375 nm, 2·89 (SD 1·06). Therefore, the relative sensitization at each wavelength (erythemal action spectrum) was: 1, 0·83, 0·67, 0·43, 0·29 and 0·22. There were significant differences between the PUVA erythemal effectiveness at different wavelengths but none between skin types.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has established the erythemal action spectrum for bath/soak PUVA therapy as is currently performed. In all volunteers, the peak sensitivity was at 325 nm. All volunteers showed a similar trend across the wavelengths studied irrespective of skin type. The determination of the action spectrum for PUVA-induced erythema is important as it permits reliable estimates of erythemal efficacy of any UVA source where the emission spectrum of the lamp is known or can be measured.

Documento de consenso sobre la modalidad terapéutica del baño-PUVA

Bath PUVA is a variant of phototherapy as efficacious as oral PUVA therapy that avoids many of the adverse effects associated to this treatment. Nevertheless, the special features and the specialized equipment required for its employment have limited its application in the dermatologic clinics of our country. Following the trend initiated after the publication of the consensus document on oral PUVA therapy and narrow band (NB) UVB therapy, the Spanish Photobiology Group from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology has developed a therapeutic guideline for bath PUVA therapy based on the literature review and the experience of its members. The document aims to be a practical reference guide for those dermatological centres that include phototherapy among their services. It reviews the concept and indications of this type of treatment and proposes recommendations concerning therapeutic procedures, drug associations of interest and prophylaxis and management of adverse effects.

Randomized, double-blind comparison of 1 mg/L versus 5 mg/L methoxsalen bath-PUVA therapy for chronic plaque-type psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Bath-psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) radiation therapy is increasingly replacing oral PUVA because of its superior short- and long-term safety profile. Several investigations in recent years have led to a refinement of the bath-PUVA protocol; however, the optimal therapeutic concentration of methoxsalen in the bath water has as yet not been delineated.

OBJECTIVES

The therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of bath-PUVA by using two different dilutions of methoxsalen (1 mg/L vs 5 mg/L or 0.0001% vs 0.0005%) were compared in 46 patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

METHODS

Scores of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index excluding psoriasis of the head (PASI(TUL)) and the Plaque Severity Index (PSI) were assessed at baseline and at biweekly intervals thereafter until (near)complete clearance or maximal improvement. In addition, methoxsalen plasma levels were determined immediately after the psoralen bath during the first week of treatment and treatment-related side effects were recorded throughout the entire study period.

RESULTS

The median baseline PASI(TUL) score decreased from 11.7 (7.5-32.8) to 3.3 (0.6-1.2) (-72%) in the 1 mg/L methoxsalen group and from 10.8 (6.6-20.7) to 1.4 (03.2) (-87%) in the 5 mg/L methoxsalen group (P < .01). The median baseline PSI score decreased from 9 (6-12) to 3.1 (0.6-10) (-66%) in the 1 mg/L methoxsalen group and from 9.3 (7.3-12) to 1.6 (0-3.6) (-83%) in the 5 mg/L methoxsalen group (P < .01). The median cumulative UVA exposure dose was 25.4 (5.3-81.5) J/cm2 for 5 mg/L methoxsalen and 71.9 (20.7-587.3) J/cm2 for 1 mg/L methoxsalen (P = .001). The number of exposures (22 [11-29] vs 23 [11-34]) and treatment duration (43 [19-68] vs 44 [23-66] days) was comparable for both methoxsalen dilutions (P = .97). Median psoralen plasma levels were 0 (0-26) ng/mL after the 1 mg/L and 30 (0-64) ng/mL after the 5 mg/L methoxsalen immersion (P = .001). Mild to moderate adverse events were more common in the 5 mg/L methoxsalen group.

LIMITATIONS

The conclusions of this randomized controlled study are limited by the relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that in bath-PUVA treatment the use of a high (5 mg/L) methoxsalen concentration is substantially more effective in clearing chronic plaque-type psoriasis than a low (1 mg/L) concentration.

Shower PUVA: A Novel Variant of Photochemotherapy

Shower PUVA is a new variant of photochemotherapy suitable for therapy of various skin disorders. Psoralen, e.g. trioxsalen-containing water recirculates in a closed shower system and wets the skin continuously. After showering, whole-body UVA irradiation (320-400 nm) is performed. In order to prove the equal distribution of photosensitivity in vivo minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) was determined in different skin areas of healthy individuals. Additionally, we investigated the accumulation of trioxsalen in psoriasis lesions under the conditions described by quantifying psoralen in scales collected after showering. In a randomized study 20 healthy volunteers (skin type I-III) took showers for 5 and 10 min in trioxsalen (0.27 mg/l)-containing water at 37 degrees C. Immediately afterwards, MPD was tested on the inside of the upper arms and on the buttocks by using a polychromator light source (315-400 nm). The applied UVA doses were 0.06-0.75 J/cm(2) with steps of 0.125 J/cm(2). MPD was evaluated after 72 h. Equal distribution of photosensitivity was defined as equal MPD on the insides of the upper arm and the buttocks (+/-0.125 J/cm(2)). Skin scales of 21 patients with psoriasis were collected by scratching after showering with trioxsalen-containing water (0.27 mg/l) for 5 min. For quantification of trioxsalen in the scales HPLC was performed. An equal distribution of photosensitivity was achieved in 70% (14/20) cases after 10-min showering in trioxsalen-containing water. Showering for 5 min only revealed a 30% (6/20) rate of equal distributed photosensitivity. After 10-min shower time MPD was 0.325 J/cm(2) (median; range: 0.06-0.625 J/cm(2)). The average amount of trioxsalen found in the scales was 2.03 ng/mg scales (range: 0.38-7.2 ng/mg). For shower PUVA using trioxsalen, 10 min shower time is recommended to achieve sufficient distribution of photosensitivity on the skin. Clinical efficacy of shower PUVA can be explained by skin accumulation of trioxsalen which enters from the aqueous phase into the upper skin layers in detectable amounts. This is the first report demonstrating the efficacy of shower PUVA which in short shower time allows an uptake of psoralen by the skin.

Correlation between 8-methoxypsoralen bath-water concentration and photosensitivity in bath-PUVA treatment

BACKGROUND

Bath-PUVA treatment, originally established in Scandinavia, offers several advantages over oral PUVA and has become increasingly popular in recent years. Outside Scandinavia 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is the prevailing photosensitizer for this PUVA modality and is used arbitrarily in a wide range of concentrations. Up to the present, data are lacking on the impact of 8-MOP bath-water concentration on UVA dosimetry.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the influence of increasing 8-MOP bath-water concentrations on photosensitivity in bath-PUVA treatment.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers without abnormal photosensitivity or recent exposure to ultraviolet radiation were included in an intraindividually controlled comparison study. In all volunteers the minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) was determined on the volar side of their forearms after immersion for 20 minutes in 4 different 8-MOP bath-water concentrations (0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 mg/L). The correlation between 8-MOP concentration and photosensitivity (defined as the reciprocal value of the MPD) was analyzed by linear regression analysis. In addition, the time course of erythema formation and the UVA dose-erythema response curve was assessed for each psoralen concentration.

RESULTS

The median MPD and the 25%-75% interquartile were 5.7 J/cm(2) (5.7-8), 4 J/cm(2) (4-5.7), 2.8 J/cm(2) (2.8-5.7), and 2 J/cm(2) (2-2.8) at an 8-MOP concentration of 0.5, 1, 2.5, and 5 mg/L, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between 8-MOP bath-water concentration and photosensitivity (r = 0.98; P =.019). Bath-PUVA-induced erythema peaked after a median time interval of 3 days, with a range of 2 to 4 days. The slope of the UVA dose-erythema response curve was similar for all psoralen concentrations.

CONCLUSION

UVA dose requirements in bath-PUVA treatment decrease linearly with increasing 8-MOP concentrations. A single MPD assessment at 72 hours after the UVA exposure is inappropriate for accurate determination of the patients' photosensitivity. The hazard of wrong UVA dosimetry is comparable at all psoralen concentrations.

Concentration-dependent phototoxicity in trimethylpsoralen bath psoralen ultraviolet A

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of topical trimethylpsoralen (TMP) psoralen bath plus ultraviolet A (bath PUVA) is considered safe with regard to the risk of skin cancer. However, the potential for severe phototoxicity limits its use.

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of dilution of the TMP bath on the minimal phototoxic dose (MPD).

METHODS

Fifteen volunteers participated in the study. The MPD tests were performed for three TMP concentrations: 0.33 mg L-1, 0.1 mg L-1 and 0.033 mg L-1 at 2-week intervals. Geometric UVA dose series increasing by a factor of radical2 were used for the testing on the previously unexposed buttock skin. The MPD72 h was assessed at 72 h from the bath.

RESULTS

For the highest TMP concentration of 0.33 mg L-1, the median MPD72 h was 0.14 J cm-2 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.14 J cm-2). For the diluted TMP bath concentration of 0.1 mg L-1, the median MPD72 h increased to 0.29 J cm-2 (95% CI, 0.2-0.41 J cm-2) and for 0.033 mg L-1 to 0.81 J cm-2 (95% CI, 0.57-1.15 J cm-2), respectively. Thus, diluting the labelled concentration of 0.33 mg L-1 1 : 10 increased the median MPD72 h 5.6-fold.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to the safety and practicality of the TMP bath PUVA, the lower concentrations of TMP may be of clinical importance, and this needs to be validated in future controlled clinical trials.

Guidelines for topical PUVA: a report of a workshop of the British photodermatology group

Psoralen photochemotherapy [psoralen ultraviolet A (PUVA)] plays an important part in dermatological therapeutics, being an effective and generally safe treatment for psoriasis and other dermatoses. In order to maintain optimal efficacy and safety, guidelines concerning best practice should be available to operators and supervisors. The British Photodermatology Group (BPG) have previously published recommendations on PUVA, including UVA dosimetry and calibration, patient pretreatment assessment, indications and contraindications, and the management of adverse reactions.1 While most current knowledge relates to oral PUVA, the use of topical PUVA regimens is also popular and presents a number of questions peculiar to this modality, including the choice of psoralen, formulation, method of application, optimal timing of treatment, UVA regimens and relative benefits or risks as compared with oral PUVA. Bath PUVA, i.e. generalized immersion, is the most frequently used modality of topical treatment, practised by about 100 centres in the U.K., while other topical preparations tend to be used for localized diseases such as those affecting the hands and feet. This paper is the product of a recent workshop of the BPG and includes guidelines for bath, local immersion and other topical PUVA. These recommendations are based, where possible, on the results of controlled studies, or otherwise on the consensus view on current practice.