Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal from sirolimus-based therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review of randomized trials

Determinants of Successful Use of Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is an established immunosuppressant in renal transplantation with antineoplastic and antiviral features, but side effects like proteinuria limit its use. The aim of this retrospective multicenter observational study is to define predictors for determining which patients most likely benefit from a sirolimus-based therapy.

METHODS

All patients from 10 German centers that were switched to a sirolimus-containing maintenance immunosuppression in 2000 to 2008 after 3 months or later post-transplantation were enrolled (n = 726). Observation times after switching to sirolimus ranged from 4 days to 9 years (median: 24.3 months). With multinomial logistic regression, risk factors for the endpoints terminal graft failure and withdrawal of sirolimus therapy compared to successful therapy were identified.

RESULTS

Successful sirolimus therapy was observed in 304 patients. Forty patients died with functioning graft. Therapy failures included graft loss (n = 106) and sirolimus-discontinuation for various reasons (n = 276). Successful sirolimus-use was predicted in 83% and graft failure in 65%, whereas prediction of deliberate sirolimus-discontinuation was poor (48%). Most favorable results for sirolimus-use were observed in patients switched in 2006 to 2008. Using ROC analysis, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 32 mL/min was shown to be the cut-off in patients withdrawing from therapy as a result of renal reasons, as well as in patients with graft loss. Proteinuria above 151 mg/L was shown to be predictive for patients with graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

eGFR and proteinuria are the major determinants for successful sirolimus-therapy. Our findings help stratifying patients who will benefit most from this therapy and avoid toxicities in patients without potential benefits for this therapy.

High Dimensional Renal Profiling: Towards a Better Understanding or Renal Transplant Immune Suppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to discuss new approaches to avoid CNI/CCS toxicities with a focus on new biologics and new methods to understand transplant rejection at the single-cell level.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently developed biologics hold significant promise as the next wave of therapeutics designed to promote CNI/CCS-free long-term allograft acceptance. Indeed, belatacept, soluble CTLA4-Ig, is largely devoid of CNI-like toxicities, although it is accompanied by an increased frequency of acute rejection. Besides belatacept, other biologics hold promise as CNI-free immune suppressive approaches. Finally, powerful new single cell approaches can enable characterization of cellular populations that drive rejection within the rejecting allograft.

SUMMARY

We propose that the incorporated single cell profiling into studies investigating new biologics in transplantation, could be tailored to each patient, correlated with potential biomarkers in the blood and urine, and provide a platform where therapeutic targets can be rationally defined, mechanistically-based, and exploited.

Mechanistic analyses in kidney transplant recipients prospectively randomized to two steroid free regimen-Low dose Tacrolimus with Everolimus versus standard dose Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), the cornerstone of immunosuppression after transplantation are implicated in nephrotoxicity and allograft dysfunction. We hypothesized that combined low doses of CNI and Everolimus (EVR) may result in better graft outcomes and greater tolerogenic milieu. Forty adult renal transplant recipients were prospectively randomized to (steroid free) low dose Tacrolimus (TAC) and EVR or standard dose TAC and Mycophenolate (MMF) after Alemtuzumab induction. Baseline characteristics were statistically similar. EVR levels were maintained at 3-8 ng/ml. TAC levels were 4.5±1.9 and 6.4±1.5 ng/ml in the TAC+EVR and TAC+MMF group respectively. Follow up was 14±4 and 17±5 months respectively and included protocol kidney biopsies at 3 and 12 months post-transplantation. Rejection-rate was lower in the TAC+EVR group. However patient and overall graft survival, eGFR and incidence of adverse events were similar. TAC+EVR induced expansion of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ regulatory T cells as early as 3 months and expansion of IFN-γ+CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ regulatory T cells at 12 months post-transplant. Gene expression profile showed a trend toward decreased inflammation, angiogenesis and connective tissue growth in the TAC+EVR Group. Thus, greater tolerogenic mechanisms were found to be operating in patients with low dose TAC+EVR and this might be responsible for the lower rejection-rate than in patients on standard dose TAC+MMF. However, further studies with longer follow up and evaluating impact on T regulatory cells are warranted.

Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m² at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin.Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.

Early Conversion to Prednisolone/Everolimus as an Alternative Weaning Regimen Associates With Beneficial Renal Transplant Histology and Function: The Randomized-Controlled MECANO Trial

In renal transplantation, use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) is associated with nephrotoxicity and immunosuppression with malignancies and infections. This trial aimed to minimize CNI exposure and total immunosuppression while maintaining efficacy. We performed a randomized controlled, open-label multicenter trial with early cyclosporine A (CsA) elimination. Patients started with basiliximab, prednisolone (P), mycophenolate sodium (MPS), and CsA. At 6 months, immunosuppression was tapered to P/CsA, P/MPS, or P/everolimus (EVL). Primary outcomes were renal fibrosis and inflammation. Secondary outcomes were estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and incidence of rejection at 24 months. The P/MPS arm was prematurely halted. The trial continued with P/CsA (N = 89) and P/EVL (N = 96). Interstitial fibrosis and inflammation were significantly decreased and the eGFR was significantly higher in the P/EVL arm. Cumulative rejection rates were 13% (P/EVL) and 19% (P/CsA), (p = 0.08). A post hoc analysis of HLA and donor-specific antibodies at 1 year after transplantation revealed no differences. An individualized immunosuppressive strategy of early CNI elimination to dual therapy with everolimus was associated with decreased allograft fibrosis, preserved allograft function, and good efficacy, but also with more serious adverse events and discontinuation. This can be a valuable alternative regimen in patients suffering from CNI toxicity.

Effects of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in murine acute lung injury models

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a key signaling kinase associated with a variety of cellular functions including the regulation of immunological and inflammatory responses. Classic mTOR inhibitors such as rapamycin or everolimus are commonly used in transplant as well as cancer patients to prevent transplant rejection or cancer progression, respectively. Noninfectious drug-induced pneumonitis is a frequent side effect in mTOR-inhibitor-treated patients. Therefore, we tested the effects of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the novel dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in a murine lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung injury model. C57BL/6 mice were treated with either everolimus or NVP-BEZ235 on two consecutive days prior to intratracheal administration of LPS. LPS administration induced a significant increase in total cell, neutrophil and erythrocyte numbers in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Histological examination revealed a serious lung injury as shown by interstitial edema, vascular congestion and mononuclear cell infiltration in these mice after 24h. Everolimus as well as NVP-BEZ235 did not noticeably affect overall histopathology of the lungs in the lung injury model. However, NVP-BEZ235 enhanced IL-6 and TNF-α expression after 24h. In contrast, everolimus did not affect IL-6 and TNF-α levels. Interestingly, both inhibitors reduced inflammatory cytokines in an LPS/oleic acid-induced lung injury model. In conclusion, the mTOR inhibitors did not worsen the overall histopathological severity, but they exerted distinct effects on proinflammatory cytokine expression in the lung depending on the lung injury model applied.

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) who would otherwise require dialysis. Patients with ESRD are at dramatically increased cardiovascular (CV) risk compared with the general population. As well as improving quality of life, successful transplantation accords major benefits by reducing CV risk in these patients. Worldwide, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death with a functioning graft and therefore is a leading cause of graft failure. This review focuses on the mechanisms underpinning excess CV morbidity and mortality and current evidence for improving CV risk in kidney transplant recipients. Conventional CV risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and pre-existing ischaemic heart disease are all highly prevalent in this group. In addition, kidney transplant recipients exhibit a number of risk factors associated with pre-existing renal disease. Furthermore, complications specific to transplantation may ensue including reduced graft function, side effects of immunosuppression and post-transplantation diabetes mellitus. Strategies to improve CV outcomes post-transplantation may include pharmacological intervention including lipid-lowering or antihypertensive therapy, optimization of graft function, lifestyle intervention and personalizing immunosuppression to the individual patients risk profile.

Is it time to give up with calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation?

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) represent today a cornerstone for the maintenance immunosuppressive treatment in solid organ transplantation. Nevertheless, several attempts have been made either to minimize their dosage or to avoid CNIs at all because these drugs have the severe side effect of chronic nephrotoxicity. This issue represents a frontier for renal transplantation. The principal problem is to understanding whether the poor outcome over the long-term may be ascribed to CNIs nephrotoxicity or to the inability of these drugs to control the acute and chronic rejection B cells mediated. The authors analyze extensively all the international trials attempting to withdraw, minimize or avoid the use of CNIs. Few trials undertaken in low risk patients with an early conversion from CNIs to proliferation signal inhibitors were successful, but the vast majority of trials failed to improve CNIs side effects. To date the use of a new drug, a co-stimulation blocker, seems promising in avoiding CNIs with similar efficacy, better glomerular filtration rate and an improved metabolic profile. Moreover the use of this drug is not associated with the development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. This point has a particular relevance, because the failure of CNIs to realize good outcomes in renal transplantation has recently ascribed to their inability to control the acute and chronic rejections B-cell mediated. This paper analyzes all the recent studies that have been done on this issue that represents the real frontier that should be overcome to realize better results over the long-term after transplantation.

Conversion to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients: to believe or not believe?

INTRODUCTION

Immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in renal transplantation is associated with chronic graft dysfunction, increased cardiovascular risk, and malignancies. Everolimus (EVR) appears to permit a CNI-sparing regimen among stable kidney recipients.

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of conversion from CNI to EVR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective registry-based study of all kidney transplant recipients converted from CNI to EVR between 2006 and 2010. One hundred fifty-one patients, including 69.5% males and with an overall mean age of 50.2 ± 12.7 years, underwent conversion to EVR at 37.0 ± 49.8 (16) months after transplantation with 33.7% during the first 6 months. Reasons for conversion included: CNI nephrotoxicity prevention (54.3%), chronic graft dysfunction (25.8%), malignant tumors (10.6%), CNI-adverse reactions (6.6%), and biopsy-proven CNI nephrotoxicity (2.6%). During a follow-up of 17.9 ± 9.9 months (range, 6-58.5), 18 patients (11.9%) were reconverted to CNI, 2 died with functioning grafts, and 2 lost kidney function.

RESULTS

We observed a significant (P < .001) increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate-Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR-MDRD) by 11.3% within 6 months: 56.7 ± 22.1 to 64.1 ± 23.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2). At final evaluation it was 13.7%, namely, to 65.5 ± 23.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2). At the end of follow-up the proportion of patients with >300 mg/d proteinuria increased from 7.9% to 23.3% (P = .001). Dyslipidemia prevalence increased from 69.5% to 77.5% (P = not significant [NS]) and arterial hypertension increased from 49% to 65.9% (P < .001) at the end of follow-up. Other reported side effects included oral ulcers (2.6%), edema (5.3%), interstitial pneumonitis (1.3%), and toxic hepatitis (1.3%), some of them leading to EVR discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In our population, renal function improved significantly after conversion from CNI to EVR. Although side effects were common, most were mild, withdrawal of EVR was necessary in a low percentage of cases. EVR appears to be an effective, safe alternative to CNI for maintenance therapy in selected kidney transplant recipients.

A prospective, multinational pharmacoepidemiological study of clinical conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression after renal transplantation

This prospective pharmacoepidemiological study examined treatment and outcomes in patients converted to sirolimus (SRL) after renal transplantation. 484 subjects in 36 centres in 7 countries were followed for up to 5 years. Principal reasons for conversion were declining graft function (146/484, 30%) and side effects of prior therapy (144/484, 30%) and the major treatment combinations after conversion were SRL ± MMF (62%), SRL + TAC (21.5%), SRL + CSA (16.5%). The cumulative probability of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) was 5% (n = 22), death-censored graft loss 12% (n = 56) and death 6% (n = 22), and there was no significant relationship to the treatment combination employed. Median calculated creatinine clearance was 48.4 (29.3, 64.5) mL/min at conversion, rising to 54.1 (41.2, 69.0) mL/min at month 1, 55.7 (39.0, 73.0) mL/min at month 12, 58.6 (39.7, 75.2) mL/min at two years and 60.9 (36.0, 77.0) mL/min at three years post-conversion. The most common adverse events were hypertension (47%), hyperlipidemia (26%), urinary tract infections (25%), anaemia (24%) and diarrhea (14%), and cardiac events, hyperlipemia and CMV infection were more common in patients converted during the first year. SRL was most frequently combined with MMF after conversion, but principal clinical outcomes were not significantly influenced by the treatment combination employed in normal practice.

The ORION study: comparison of two sirolimus-based regimens versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients

Safety and efficacy of two sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens were compared with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Renal transplantation recipients were randomized to Group 1 (SRL+TAC; week 13 TAC elimination [n = 152]), Group 2 (SRL + MMF [n = 152]) or Group 3 (TAC + MMF [n = 139]). Group 2, with higher-than-expected biopsy-confirmed acute rejections (BCARs), was sponsor-terminated; therefore, Group 2 two-year data were limited. At 1 and 2 years, respectively, graft (Group 1: 92.8%, 88.5%; Group 2: 90.6%, 89.9%; Group 3: 96.2%, 95.4%) and patient (Group 1: 97.3%, 94.4%; Group 2: 95.2%, 94.5%; Group 3: 97.0%, 97.0%) survival rates were similar. One- and 2-year BCAR incidence was: Group 1, 15.2%, 17.4%; Group 2, 31.3%, 32.8%; Group 3, 8.2%, 12.3% (Group 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001). Mean 1- and 2-year modified intent-to-treat glomerular filtration rates (mL/min) were similar. Primary reason for discontinuation was adverse events (Group 1, 34.2%; Group 2, 33.6%; Group 3, 22.3%; p < 0.05). In Groups 1 and 2, delayed wound healing and hyperlipidemia were more frequent. One-year post hoc analysis of new-onset diabetes posttransplantation was greater in TAC recipients (Groups 1 and 3 vs. 2, 17% vs. 6%; p = 0.004). Between-group malignancy rates were similar. The SRL-based regimens were not associated with improved outcomes for kidney transplantation patients.

Conversion from sirolimus to everolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving a calcineurin-free regimen

BACKGROUND

Everolimus (EVL) and sirolimus (SRL) were introduced into immunosuppressive regimens, in an attempt to replace or reduce the dose of the nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). In our institution, due to an administrative decision, conversion from SRL to EVL, was carried out, providing us the opportunity to investigate the effectiveness and safety profile of both drugs and to review the practical conversion dose between them.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 51 maintenance kidney transplant recipients receiving an SRL-based CNI-free regimen, who were switched to EVL. SRL dose was concentration controlled to a through level of 4-8 ng/mL. Patients were converted to a variable dose of EVL that was adjusted to achieve a trough concentration of 3-8 ng/mL.

RESULTS

SRL mean dose at time of conversion was 2.0 ± 0.9 mg/d. Initial EVL mean dose was 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/d. Six months after conversion, mean EVL trough level was 6.2 ± 2.8 ng/mL. EVL dose at this point was 2.0 ± 0.9 mg/d, which was not statistically different from SRL dose at the time of conversion (p = 0.575), suggesting a conversion factor of 1:1. During this six month period post conversion, no significant changes were observed in serum creatinine, hematocrit level, platelet count, proteinuria or lipid levels. No patient experienced an acute rejection episode.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from SRL to EVL in renal transplant recipients receiving a CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen can be performed safely with a low trough level range of EVL. We report for the first time a conversion factor between SRL and EVL.

Optimal immunosuppression to prevent chronic allograft dysfunction

Prevention of chronic allograft dysfunction is currently one of the main goals in renal transplantation for the improvement of kidney graft survival. For this purpose, refinements in immunosuppressive regimens, both controlling alloimmune responses and avoiding calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-derived nephrotoxicity, are mandatory. The majority of trials aiming to avoid CNI-related nephrotoxicity have only reported short-term data, with different rates of acute rejection depending on the strategy performed. First attempts of CNI-free strategies in micophenolate mofetil-based regimens showed unsatisfactory results in terms of increased acute rejection events. With the advent of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, a new optimistic perspective seemed to appear. Despite an increased risk of rejection, better graft function and graft parenchyma preservation seem to be associated with such a strategy, at least in the short term, with a potential benefit in terms of less cardiovascular-related adverse events and malignancies. New biological agents such as belatacep have been developed as another interesting strategy for CNI avoidance. Importantly, in any case, longer-term analyses of all these CNI-avoidance strategies are warranted in order to confirm whether persistent immune-mediated graft damage can be safely overcome.

Long-Term Impact of Cyclosporin Reduction with MMF Treatment in Chronic Allograft Dysfunction: REFERENECE Study 3-Year Follow Up

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity contributes to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). In the 2-year, randomized, study, we showed that 50% cyclosporin (CsA) reduction in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment improves kidney function without increasing the risk for graft rejection/loss. To investigate the long-term effect of this regimen, we conducted a follow up study in 70 kidney transplant patients until 5 years after REFERENCE initiation. The improvement of kidney function was confirmed in the MMF group but not in the control group (CsA group). Four graft losses occurred, 2 in each group (graft survival in the MMF group 95.8% and 90.9% in control group). One death occurred in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of serious adverse events or acute graft rejections. A limitation is the weak proportion of patient still remaining within the control group. On the other hand, REFERENCE focuses on the CsA regimen while opinions about the tacrolimus ones are still debated. In conclusion, CsA reduction in the presence of MMF treatment seems to maintain kidney function and is well tolerated in the long term.

[Replacing calcineurin inhibitors with proliferation signal inhibitors after kidney transplantation: indications, results, and disadvantages]

In the kidney transplant patient, calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) treatment is a major risk factor for chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Immunosuppressive strategies based on non-nephrotoxic drugs such as proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) have been conceived to reduce or even interrupt CNIs. CNI conversion, with progressive cessation over 3 months with a PSI can significantly improve renal function, notably if the patient presents proteinuria less than 0.8 g/day and if conversion is undertaken early, when the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is 40 ml/min or greater. In these conditions GRF improvement is associated with a histological CADI score and chronic lesion markers. Nevertheless, replacing CNIs with a PSI can occasionally induce proteinuria that is potentially related to direct toxicity of the PSI on the podocytes, which must be monitored to prevent recurrence of nephrotoxicity lesions.

[Proliferation signal inhibitors: what therapeutic protocols are followed in 2009?]

Proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI) have been used in France for kidney transplants for some ten years. They provide a certain number of long-term benefits for kidney function in transplant patients due to their anti-proliferation and anti-tumour properties and absence of nephrotoxicity. Their use has been evaluated in therapeutic regimens aimed at reducing the nephrotoxicity associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Strategies based on minimizing the use of CNIs and therapy switches between 3 and 6 months have shown promising results, especially in terms of prevention of deterioration of kidney function. The best time to make the switch has not yet been defined with certainty, but predictors of success, preservation of good kidney function and absence of proteinuria have been established. Aside from cases of demonstrated CNI toxicity, a history or onset of de novo cancer is a situation in which this type of regimen can be considered.

Prospective observational study of sirolimus as primary immunosuppression after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND.: Sirolimus (SRL) is an important component of clinical immunosuppression in renal transplantation, but few international studies have examined how this agent is used in routine practice. METHODS.: Within a large prospective pharmacoepidemiological study, 718 de novo renal graft recipients treated with SRL in 65 centers in 10 countries were monitored for up to 5 years posttransplant to compare the principal outcomes and adverse effects by treatment regimen. RESULTS.: Principal treatment regimens were SRL without a calcineurin inhibitor (33%), SRL+cyclosporine A (CsA) (33%), and SRL+tacrolimus (TAC) (34%); 18% of subjects discontinued SRL, 124/718 (17%) developed biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), 64/718 (9%) lost their graft, and 50/718 (7%) died during follow-up. Calculated creatinine clearance was 66+/-26 mL/min at 2 years. The most common adverse events were hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anemia, urinary tract infections, and diabetes. BCAR was significantly lower in subjects receiving SRL+TAC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, P=0.009) but not significantly lower in those receiving SRL+CsA (HR 0.62, P=0.102) compared with SRL without a calcineurin inhibitor. Graft loss or death did not significantly differ between treatment groups but were associated, respectively, with deceased donor grafts (HR 3.33, P<0.001) and increased age (HR 1.04, P<0.001). No improvement was observed in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil in any treatment combination (HR 0.80, P=0.438 for BCAR; HR 0.93, P=0.849 for graft loss; and HR 0.75, P=0.531 for death). CONCLUSIONS.: SRL is most commonly used in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, CsA, or TAC. BCAR was least common in subjects receiving SRL+TAC, but other outcomes seemed comparable between the treatment regimens in routine practice.

Fibrogenesis in kidney transplantation: potential targets for prevention and therapy

Kidney allograft fibrosis results from a reactive process mediated by humoral and cellular events and the activation of transforming growth factor beta1. It is a process that involves both parenchymal and graft infiltrating cells and can lead to organ failure if injury persists or if the response to injury is excessive. In this review, we will address the role of preventive and therapeutic strategies that target kidney allograft fibrogenesis. We conclude that in addition to preventive strategies, therapies based on bone morphogenetic protein 7, hepatocyte growth factor, connective tissue growth factor, and pirfenidone have shown promising results in preclinical studies. Clinical trials are needed to examine the effect of these therapies on long-term outcomes.

Subclinical toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors in repeated protocol biopsies: an independent risk factor for chronic kidney allograft damage

The purpose of the prospective study was to determine the prevalence of subclinical toxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CI) in repeated protocol renal allograft biopsies and to assess its impact on the development of chronic graft changes. A total of 424 biopsies were conducted in a cohort of 158 patients; of these biopsies, 158 were in the third week, 142 were in the third month and 124 were in the first year after transplantation. Histological signs of toxicity occurred in the third week in 33 (20.1%) patients, with persistence after CI dose reduction in the third month in 27 (19.0%) and in the first year in 23 (18.5%) patients. Of the toxic changes, 52% were clinically silent. At the end of the one-year follow-up, both subclinical and clinically manifest toxicity resulted in a similar progression of chronic changes quantified by Banff chronicity score and they significantly differed from the control group (P< 0.05). Subclinical toxicity affects a significant percentage of grafts; it occurs independently of dosage, blood level and type of applied CI. It is associated with the progression of chronic changes as early as in the first year after transplantation and represents an independent risk factor for chronic allograft damage. We report here our clinical approach to toxicity.

[Minimize kidney failure in transplantation patients with proliferation signal inhibitors]

Chronic renal dysfunction is a multifactorial and frequent event after organ transplantation. The measurement or the estimation of glomerular filtration rate is essential to detect early progressive renal dysfunction. Proliferation signal inhibitors are nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressive drugs which may be useful to minimize calcineurin inhibitors-related side effects through a conversion strategy. Most studies in the setting of kidney transplantation showed improvement in glomerular filtration rate as high than conversion was early. Proliferation signal inhibitors may be included quickly in new immunosuppressive regimen for liver transplanted patients with chronic renal dysfunction.

Interstitial fibrosis quantification in renal transplant recipients randomized to continue cyclosporine or convert to sirolimus

Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus at week 12 after kidney transplantation is associated with a significant improvement in renal function. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the effect of this conversion on interstitial fibrosis (IF), a hallmark of chronic allograft injury, in patients taking part in the CONCEPT trial. This multicenter, prospective, trial included 193 renal recipients randomized at week 12 to switch from CsA to sirolimus or to continue CsA, with mycophenolate mofetil. Routine biopsy with automated, quantified assessment of IF by a program of color segmentation was performed at 1 year in 121 patients. At 1 year, renal function was significantly improved in the conversion group as assessed by estimated GFR (MDRD) and measured GFR. Biopsy results, however, showed no between-group difference in percentage of IF. Calculated GFR at 1 year was significantly associated with the percentage of IF (p = 0.004, R(2)= 0.07). By multivariate analysis diabetic patients had more fibrosis than non-diabetic patients. In conclusion, although kidney transplant patients converted from CsA to sirolimus showed significant improvement in renal function, we found no difference of IF on 1-year biopsies.

Where did we leave off in 2008? Conclusions from the 8th International Symposium

Although short-term outcomes following kidney transplantation have improved in recent years, allograft viability beyond 1 year has changed little since the introduction of cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a continuing threat to improved long-term outcomes, and regimens that involve calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are implicated as a result of the progressive fibrosis they promote in renal allografts. Although strategies to reduce the nephrotoxic effects of CNI exposure have shown some success, alternative approaches to reducing nephrotoxicity and graft failure are needed. Sirolimus (SRL) suppresses immune reactions in a mechanism distinct from that of other immunosuppressants and may therefore hold potential for reducing the risk of CAN and improving long-term graft survival. The Rapamune Maintenance Regimen study randomized patients at 3 months either to continue with a regimen of SRL, CsA, and steroids or to have CsA withdrawn and the dose of SRL increased. Patients who were randomized to CsA withdrawal had superior graft and patient survival, demonstrated improved renal function, better blood pressure control, and a lower rate of skin and nonskin posttransplantation malignancy. A key barrier to the wider clinical implementation of SRL in kidney transplantation has, however, been the understanding of its optimal incorporation into standard immunosuppressive protocols. The CONVERT study examined the late conversion (approximately 3 years posttransplantation) from CNI to SRL. Late conversion was associated with inferior outcomes in patients with poor graft function or significant proteinuria following conversion. In addition, a number of short-term adverse events, such as prolongation of delayed graft function and abnormal wound healing, have been more commonly associated with de novo approaches. In designing the optimal approach to achieving long-term CNI-free immunosuppression with SRL, it should therefore be considered how these adverse events may be avoided or minimized. This brings into focus the optimal timing for the introduction of SRL and the potential for a two-stage approach to immunosuppression, minimizing the different short- and long-term risks to both the graft and the patient.

Tacrolimus/sirolimus versus tacrolimus/mycophenolate in kidney transplantation: improved 3-year graft and patient survival in recent era

BACKGROUND

Registry analyses suggest that tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolate (MPA) immunosuppression is associated with superior kidney graft survival versus TAC/sirolimus (SRL). Large single-center experience can assist in clarifying these findings, by examining outcomes related to specific utilization practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the outcomes of 518 consecutive first renal transplants at a single center treated with TAC/SRL (n=307) or TAC/MPA (n=211) with prednisone. Graft and patient survival, acute rejection, and 1-year glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were analyzed by era of transplant (2000-2002 vs. 2003-2006). Changes in TAC/SRL utilization between eras included elimination of the SRL loading dose and a reduction in TAC target trough concentrations.

RESULTS

Three-year graft survival with TAC/SRL was lower when first used (2000-2002) because of a higher incidence of patient death, primarily due to cardiovascular causes. Survival improved from 85.3% to 95.9% between 2000 to 2002 and 2003 to 2006 (P=0.001), with comparable graft and patient survival between TAC/SRL and TAC/MPA cohorts, confirmed following multivariable analysis controlling for donor and recipient factors. Rates of BK virus and acute rejection were comparable, but a higher incidence of hyperlipidemia, anemia, posttransplant diabetes, and a lower 1-year GFR (57.6 vs. 63.1 mL/min, P=0.008) was noted in the TAC/SRL cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, as the largest long-term single-center report comparing TAC/SRL with TAC/MPA in kidney transplantation, demonstrate worse patient survival initially with TAC/SRL, with improved outcomes in a later era that were temporally associated with reduced TAC exposure. Differences in cardiovascular risk factors and 1-year GFR highlight the need for further investigation of the optimal utilization of SRL in kidney transplantation.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing with mycophenolate in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limiting the exposure of kidney transplant recipients to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has potential merit, but there is no clear consensus on the utility of current strategies. In an attempt to aid clarification, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed CNI sparing (minimization or elimination) with mycophenolate as sole adjunctive immunosuppression.

METHODS

The search strategy identified trials where CNI sparing was accompanied by the continuation of, or conversion to, mycophenolate and compared with standard or higher dose CNI therapy. Two investigators independently examined each trial for eligibility, quality, and outcome measures. Additional subgroup analyses were assessed: (1) de novo CNI sparing; (2) elective CNI sparing beyond 2 months posttransplantation; and (3) CNI sparing for transplant dysfunction.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria permitting analysis of 3312 renal transplant recipients with median follow-up of 12 months. CNI sparing significantly improved glomerular filtration rate (weighted mean difference 4.4 mL/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-5.9, P<0.001); with some evidence, albeit weak, of improved graft survival (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.01, P=0.06). Acute rejection rates were only increased after elective CNI elimination (odds ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.57-3.17, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality, malignancy or incidence of infections.

CONCLUSIONS

CNI sparing strategies with adjunctive mycophenolate may play an important role in kidney transplant recipients. Improvements in short-term graft function, and possibly graft survival, are achievable. Longer term studies are needed to substantiate the short-term benefits, and refining elective CNI elimination protocols may help to reduce the risk of rejection.

Pathogenesis and management of chronic allograft nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a common cause of late kidney transplant failure, characterized by progressive histological damage in the allograft. Although functional biomarkers such as creatinine are typically used to predict CAN, recent evidence suggests that composite, quantitative histological indices may be better predictors of long-term graft outcomes. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have been associated with major improvements in early rejection outcomes, but appear to cause both acute and chronic nephrotoxicity. The acute phase is associated with functional nephrotoxicity and is reversible with a reduction in CNI dosage, whereas the chronic phase is characterized by persistent histological lesions that are typically irreversible. Results from recent clinical trials suggest that converting from a CNI to sirolimus, withdrawing a CNI from a sirolimus-based regimen or using a CNI-free strategy may improve long-term outcomes by reducing CNI-related nephrotoxicity. However, in the de novo transplant setting, triple therapy with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids is not recommended in combination with basiliximab induction. A treatment algorithm, based on the patient's histological score obtained on an allograft biopsy taken at approximately 6-12 months post-transplant, has been developed by our group and is described here.