Primary nonfunction (PNF) in the MELD Era: An SRTR database analysis

Validation and performance of three scoring systems for predicting primary non-function and early allograft failure after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Primary non-function (PNF) and early allograft failure (EAF) after liver transplantation (LT) seriously affect patient outcomes. In clinical practice, effective prognostic tools for early identifying recipients at high risk of PNF and EAF were urgently needed. Recently, the Model for Early Allograft Function (MEAF), PNF score by King's College (King-PNF) and Balance-and-Risk-Lactate (BAR-Lac) score were developed to assess the risks of PNF and EAF. This study aimed to externally validate and compare the prognostic performance of these three scores for predicting PNF and EAF.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 720 patients with primary LT between January 2015 and December 2020. MEAF, King-PNF and BAR-Lac scores were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) analyses.

RESULTS

Of all 720 patients, 28 (3.9%) developed PNF and 67 (9.3%) developed EAF in 3 months. The overall early allograft dysfunction (EAD) rate was 39.0%. The 3-month patient mortality was 8.6% while 1-year graft-failure-free survival was 89.2%. The median MEAF, King-PNF and BAR-Lac scores were 5.0 (3.5-6.3), -2.1 (-2.6 to -1.2), and 5.0 (2.0-11.0), respectively. For predicting PNF, MEAF and King-PNF scores had excellent area under curves (AUCs) of 0.872 and 0.891, superior to BAR-Lac (AUC = 0.830). The NRI and IDI analyses confirmed that King-PNF score had the best performance in predicting PNF while MEAF served as a better predictor of EAD. The EAF risk curve and 1-year graft-failure-free survival curve showed that King-PNF was superior to MEAF and BAR-Lac scores for stratifying the risk of EAF.

CONCLUSIONS

MEAF, King-PNF and BAR-Lac were validated as practical and effective risk assessment tools of PNF. King-PNF score outperformed MEAF and BAR-Lac in predicting PNF and EAF within 6 months. BAR-Lac score had a huge advantage in the prediction for PNF without post-transplant variables. Proper use of these scores will help early identify PNF, standardize grading of EAF and reasonably select clinical endpoints in relative studies.

Cold ischemia time in liver transplantation: An overview

The standard approach to organ preservation in liver transplantation is by static cold storage and the time between the cross-clamping of a graft in a donor and its reperfusion in the recipient is defined as cold ischemia time (CIT). This simple definition reveals a multifactorial time frame that depends on donor hepatectomy time, transit time, and recipient surgery time, and is one of the most important donor-related risk factors which may influence the graft and recipient's survival. Recently, the growing demand for the use of marginal liver grafts has prompted scientific exploration to analyze ischemia time factors and develop different organ preservation strategies. This review details the CIT definition and analyzes its different factors. It also explores the most recent strategies developed to implement each timestamp of CIT and to protect the graft from ischemic injury.

A randomized-controlled trial of ischemia-free liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) has thus far been considered as an inevitable component of organ transplantation, compromising outcomes, and limiting organ availability. Ischemia-free organ transplantation is a novel approach designed to avoid IRI, with the potential to improve outcomes.

METHODS

In this randomized-controlled clinical trial, recipients of livers from donors after brain death were randomly assigned to receive either an ischemia-free or a 'conventional' transplant. The primary endpoint was the incidence of early allograft dysfunction. Secondary endpoints included complications related to graft IRI.

RESULTS

Out of 68 randomized patients, 65 underwent transplants and were included in the analysis. 32 patients received ischemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT), and 33 received conventional liver transplantation (CLT). Early allograft dysfunction occurred in two recipients (6%) randomized to IFLT and in eight (24%) randomized to CLT (difference -18%; 95% CI -35% to -1%; p = 0.044). Post-reperfusion syndrome occurred in three recipients (9%) randomized to IFLT and in 21 (64%) randomized to CLT (difference -54%; 95% CI -74% to -35%; p <0.001). Non-anastomotic biliary strictures diagnosed with protocol magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 12 months were observed in two recipients (8%) randomized to IFLT and in nine (36%) randomized to CLT (difference, -28%; 95% CI -50% to -7%; p = 0.014). The comprehensive complication index at 1 year after transplantation was 30.48 (95% CI 23.25-37.71) in the IFLT group vs. 42.14 (95% CI 35.01-49.26) in the CLT group (difference -11.66; 95% CI -21.81 to -1.51; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with end-stage liver disease, IFLT significantly reduced complications related to IRI compared to a conventional approach.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org. ChiCTR1900021158.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Ischemia-reperfusion injury has thus far been considered as an inevitable event in organ transplantation, compromising outcomes and limiting organ availability. Ischemia-free liver transplantation is a novel approach of transplanting donor livers without interruption of blood supply. We showed that in patients with end-stage liver disease, ischemia-free liver transplantation, compared with a conventional approach, led to reduced complications related to ischemia-reperfusion injury in this randomized trial. This new approach is expected to change the current practice in organ transplantation, improving transplant outcomes, increasing organ utilization, while providing a clinical model to delineate the impact of organ injury on alloimmunity.

Delta Neutrophil Index as a New Early Mortality Predictor after Liver Transplantation

Background: Patients with liver disease display numerous defects of the immune system, so infection is a frequent complication of both acute and chronic liver disease. These infections are independently associated with poor outcomes after liver transplantation. Our objective was to evaluate the delta neutrophil index (DNI), a new inflammation marker, as a predictor of survival after liver transplantation (LT). Methods: This observational study retrospectively evaluated the records of 712 patients who underwent LT from January 2010 to February 2018. DNI was evaluated at pre-transplantation and 1, 7, 14, and 30 days after operation. Statistical analysis was performed using the T-test or chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis. Results: The mean MELD score was 16.7 ± 9.4 (0–48). There were 125 mortality cases (17.8%) after liver transplantation. Mean DNI was 1.61 at pre-transplantation, 3.94 one day after operation, 2.67 seven days after operation, 1.61 fourteen days after operation, and 1.64 thirty days after operation, respectively. In multivariate analysis, DNI seven and fourteen days after operation was revealed as an independent prognostic factor for mortality after liver transplantation (p = 0.040 and p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The DNI is a simple and reliable predictor of patient mortality after liver transplantation.

Intensive care management of liver transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment for advanced liver disease and liver failure. Current allocation schemes utilized for liver transplantation mandate a 'sickest first' approach, thus most liver transplants occur in patients with severe systemic illness. For intensive care providers who care for liver transplant recipients, a foundation of knowledge of technical considerations of orthotopic liver transplantation, basic management considerations, and common complications is essential. This review highlights the authors' approach to intensive care management of the postoperative liver transplant recipient with a review of common issues, which arise in this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of centers offering liver transplantation continues to increase globally and the number of patients receiving liver transplantation also continues to increase. The number of patients with advanced liver disease far outpaces organ availability and, therefore, patients undergoing liver transplant are sicker at the time of transplant. Outcomes for liver transplant patients continue to improve owing to advancements in surgical technique, immunosuppression management, and intensive care management of liver disease both pretransplant and posttransplant.

SUMMARY

Given a global increase in liver transplantation, an increasing number of intensive care professionals are likely to care for this patient population. For these providers, a foundational knowledge of the common complications and key management considerations is essential.

Children undergoing early liver re-transplantation for primary non-function have improved survival

BACKGROUND

Primary non-function (PNF) in the early post-LT period in children leads to prolonged hospitalization, high graft loss, and significant mortality. However, there is a paucity of data available on the natural history of children relisted for LT due to PNF, including those who recover graft function and survive with their original allograft.

METHODS

We interrogated the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database for pediatric LT recipients who were relisted with a primary diagnosis of PNF from 2000 to 2020. Patients >21-year-old and multiple organ transplants were excluded. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to identify risk factors for early re-transplantation (within 30 days of relisting) and mortality after adjusting for baseline clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were relisted for LT for PNF during the study period. Twenty-five patients survived beyond 30 days from relisting with their original LT, 76 underwent early re-transplantation, and 7 did not survive. Having a high-risk EBV mismatch (OR 2.03, 95% CI 0.66-6.27) and an elevated donor serum creatinine (OR: 2.19, 95% CI 0.54-8.84) were associated with increased odds of a patient requiring early re-transplantation. Donor characteristics including age, final total bilirubin, final AST/ALT, and final serum sodium, as well as vasopressor use prior to procurement, were not associated with increased odds of early re-transplantation (p > 0.05). Operative characteristics including allograft type and cold-ischemia time were also not associated with early re-transplantation (p > 0.05). Patients undergoing early re-transplantation showed a trend toward improved 1-year graft survival (69% vs 55%, p = 0.24). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling, early re-transplantation was associated with reduced risk of overall patient mortality compared to those who survived with their original LT (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.67).

CONCLUSION

Early re-transplantation for PNF is associated with improved patient survival compared with patients who survive with their original LT.

Primary Nonfunction and Early Allograft Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite continuous progress in the field of liver transplantation, considerable proportion of patients still suffer from the postoperative graft dysfunction. Clinically, it presents as early allograft dysfunction (EAD), and its more severe form defined as primary nonfunction (PNF). Posttransplant liver dysfunction translates into significantly worse treatment outcomes.

SUMMARY

Both entities are multifactorial, with donor (graft), recipient, and procedure-related factors playing the key roles. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a major driver of their development. So far, various noninvasive (pharmacological) and invasive strategies have been tested to mitigate its negative effects. This article pre-sents the current approach to diagnosis, prediction, and management of EAD and PNF.

KEY MESSAGES

Different pharmacological interventions may be considered to improve graft function after liver transplantation. Machine perfusion seems to be the most effective method at the moment.

Primary Nonfunction of the Liver Allograft

Severe allograft dysfunction, as opposed to the expected immediate function, following liver transplantation is a major complication, and the clinical manifestations of such that lead to either immediate retransplant or death are the catastrophic end of the spectrum. Primary nonfunction (PNF) has declined in incidence over the years, yet the impact on patient and healthcare teams, and the burden on the organ pool in case of the need for retransplant should not be underestimated. There is no universal test to define the diagnosis of PNF, and current criteria are based on various biochemical parameters surrogate of liver function; moreover, a disparity remains within different healthcare systems on selecting candidates eligible for urgent retransplantation. The impact on PNF from traditionally accepted risk factors has changed somewhat, mainly driven by the rising demand for organs, combined with the concerted approach by clinicians on the in-depth understanding of PNF, optimal graft recipient selection, mitigation of the clinical environment in which a marginal graft is reperfused, and postoperative management. Regardless of the mode, available data suggest machine perfusion strategies help reduce the incidence further but do not completely avert the risk of PNF. The mainstay of management relies on identifying severe allograft dysfunction at a very early stage and aggressive management, while excluding other identifiable causes that mimic severe organ dysfunction. This approach may help salvage some grafts by preventing total graft failure and also maintaining a patient in an optimal physiological state if retransplantation is considered the ultimate patient salvage strategy.

In-hospital mortality of liver transplantation and risk factors: a single-center experience

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure. However, in-hospital death cannot be avoided. We designed this study to analyze patients' in-hospital mortality rate after LT and the factors correlated with in-hospital death.

Methods

The data of patients who received LT in our hospital between January 11, 2015, and November 19, 2019, were obtained from the China Liver Transplant Registry and medical records. The in-hospital mortality rate was calculated, and factors related to mortality, cause of death, and factors related to cause of death were analyzed by reviewing patients' data.

Results

A total of 529 patients who underwent cadaveric LT were enrolled in this study. Modified piggyback orthotopic LT was performed for all patients. Seventy patients died in the hospital after LT, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 13.2%. Factors including model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, Child-Pugh grading, intraoperative blood loss, and anhepatic phase were correlated with in-hospital death. MELD score and intraoperative blood loss were determined as the two independent risk factors of in-hospital death. The first two causes of death were infection (34.3%) and primary non-function (15.7%). Pulmonary fungal infection was the main cause of infectious death. MELD score was the independent risk factor for infectious death, and both body mass index of donors and cold ischemic time were independent risk factors of primary non-function.

Conclusions

In-hospital death poses a threat to certain patients undergoing LT. Our study suggests that the main cause of in-hospital death is an infection, followed by primary non-function.

Delayed Calcineurin Inhibitor Introduction Without Antibody Induction in Liver Transplantation Is Safe and Helps Preserve Kidney Function

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common after liver transplantation and affects outcome after liver transplantation. Antibody induction is commonly used to reduce dose and/or to delay introduction of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) but is very expensive. We propose a modified immunosuppressive protocol that delays administration of CNI for 48 to 72 hours without antibody induction. This study evaluates the results of our new protocol.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed. Study patients had induction with steroid and mycophenolate mofetil without antibody induction, and CNI administration was delayed for 48 to 72 hours. Control patients received CNI and steroid induction without antibody induction, and CNI was continued posttransplant. AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level of at least 1.5 times the pretransplant baseline within the first postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty liver transplant recipients from 2013 to 2015 were included in this study (30 in the delayed CNI group and 30 in the control group). The patient characteristics and intraoperative factors were comparable in both groups. AKI developed in 11 patients in the study group and in 20 patients in the control group (37% vs 66.7%; P = .02). There was no acute rejection observed in the first month in either group.

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that delayed CNI introduction without antibody induction is safe and helps preserve kidney function. Antibody induction can be omitted safely in a delayed CNI introduction protocol to reduce the cost of liver transplantation without increasing the risk of acute rejection.

Incidence and risk factors of primary non-function after liver transplantation using grafts from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death

BACKGROUND

Graft primary non-function (PNF) is the most severe complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and is frequently associated with livers from uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD).

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of patients showing PNF after receiving uDCD liver grafts. The series comprises 75 OLT performed during 11 years.

RESULTS

The incidence of PNF using uDCD livers was 8%. We compared patients who developed PNF (n = 6) vs. patients without PNF (n = 69). Mean pump flow of donors during normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) was significantly lower in PNF (p = .032). Day 1 post-OLT levels of transaminases and the incidence of renal complications and postoperative mortality were also significantly higher in the PNF group, but 5-year patient survival was similar in both groups (66.7% in PNF and 68.5% in non-PNF). All PNF patients underwent re-OLT, and 2 died. PNF incidence has decreased in the last 5-years. Binary logistic regression analysis confirmed final ALT value >4 times the normal value as risk factor for PNF, and median donor pump flow >3700 ml/min as protective effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate donor pump flow during NRP was a protective.

Recent developments and ongoing trials in transplant oncology

Over the past two decades since the introduction of the Milan criteria, the field of transplant oncology has undergone a rapid development with a rising proportion of liver transplantations being performed for oncological indications. For many patients with liver tumours, transplantation represents the only chance for cure. However, many challenges remain, such as the adequate patient selection, management of post-transplant recurrence and refinement of neoadjuvant treatment protocols. This review provides an overview of the current state of the art of liver transplantation for oncological indications such as hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal liver metastasis and metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. We also summarize the ongoing research and explore future trends. Clinical trials are currently studying new diagnostic modalities, innovative pharmacological treatments, novel surgical techniques, downstaging regimens and new indications for liver transplantation. These emerging results will continue to shape the field of transplant oncology and provide us with the necessary tools to better select, treat and follow patients with liver tumours qualifying for liver transplantation.

Implications of liver donor age on ischemia reperfusion injury and clinical outcomes

The aging process causes detrimental changes in a variety of organ systems. These changes include: lesser ability to cope with stress, impaired repair mechanisms and decreased cellular functional reserve capacity. Not surprisingly, aging has been associated with increased susceptibility of donor heart and kidneys grafts to ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). In the context of liver transplantation, however, the effect of donor age seems to be less influential in predisposing the graft to IRI. In fact, a widely comprehensive understanding of IRI in the aged liver has yet to be agreed upon in the literature. Nevertheless, there have been many reported implications of increased liver donor age with poor clinical outcomes besides IRI. These other poor outcomes include: earlier HCV recurrence, increased rates of acute rejection and greater resistance to tolerance induction. While these other correlations have been identified, it is important to re-emphasize the fact that a unified consensus in regard to liver donor age and IRI has not yet been reached among researchers in this field. Many researchers have even demonstrated that the extent of IRI in aged livers can be ameliorated by careful donor selection, strict allocation or novel therapeutic modalities to decrease IRI. Thus, the goals of this review paper are twofold: 1) To delineate and summarize the conflicting data in regard to liver donor age and IRI. 2) Suggest that careful donor selection, appropriate allocation and strategic effort to minimize IRI can reduce the frequency of a variety of poor outcomes with aged liver donations.

Transplant Outcomes of Donation After Circulatory Death Livers Recovered With Versus Without Premortem Heparin Administration

Premortem heparin administration during donation after circulatory death (DCD) organ recovery is thought to optimize liver perfusion. However, premortem heparinization is not universally practiced in the United States and limited data exist regarding its utility. US registry data were accessed between January 1, 2003, and March 10, 2017, and 2 cohorts were ascertained: (1) DCD donor livers recovered for transplantation (n = 5495) and (2) liver-only adult transplant recipients of DCD livers (n = 3754). Exclusions were donor unknown heparin status (n = 40), positive donor hepatitis B surface antigen (n = 4) and hepatitis C virus (n = 120) serologies, and for the outcomes analysis, livers placed outside the United States (n = 10). Discard rates and graft outcomes were examined from cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Of 5495 DCD livers recovered for transplant, 589 (10.7%) donors did not receive premortem heparin (no heparin) and the remaining 4906 (89.3%) received heparin (heparin). Liver discard was similar between the no heparin (30.6%) and heparin groups (30.8%; P = 0.90). Heparin status was not associated with liver discard on multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.18 P = 0.76). The cumulative probability of overall graft survival was lower in the no heparin group relative to the heparin group (P < 0.05), and this finding persisted on multivariate analysis. No heparin group transplants had an 18% higher hazard of overall graft failure compared with those that received heparin (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.38; P < 0.05). In conclusion, organ recovery heparin administration status was not associated with liver discard. Failure to pretreat organ donors with premortem heparin correlates with worse liver transplant graft survival compared with heparin-treated livers.

Combined ischemic and rapamycin preconditioning alleviated liver ischemia and reperfusion injury by restoring autophagy in aged mice

Old livers are more damaged by hepatic ischemia and reperfusion (IR) injury than young livers. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ischemic and rapamycin preconditioning on IR injury in old livers. Young (8-week-old) and aged (60-week-old) mice were subjected to IR or a sham control procedure. The aged mice were randomly divided into six groups: IR (CON), IR with ischemic preconditioning (IPC), IR with rapamycin preconditioning (RAPA), IR with combined ischemic and rapamycin preconditioning (IPC + RAPA), IR with 3-methyladenine (3-MA), IR with combined ischemic and rapamycin preconditioning with 3-MA pretreatment (IPC + RAPA+3-MA). Liver injury was evaluated 6 h after reperfusion. Hepatocellular autophagy induction was also analyzed by western blotting. The results revealed that aged mice had aggravated liver IR injury as compared to young mice. In aged mice following IR, IPC + RAPA but not IPC or RAPA alleviated liver injury, as evidenced by lower levels of serum ALT, improved preservation of liver architecture with lower Suzuki scores, and decreased caspase-3 activity compared with CON. In addition, western blot analysis revealed increased LC3B II but decreased p62 protein expression levels in the IPC + RAPA group, indicating that autophagic flux was restored by combined ischemic and rapamycin preconditioning. Furthermore, autophagy inhibition by the inhibitor 3-MA abrogated the protective role in the IPC + RAPA group, while no significant effects were observed in the CON group. In conclusions, our results demonstrated that combined ischemic and rapamycin preconditioning protected old livers against IR injury, which was likely attributed to restored autophagy activation.

The Impact of Steatosis on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims

Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease as well as for cases of acute liver failure. Facing organ donor shortage, liver transplant teams had to use marginal organs. Thus, increasing availability is a key concern of donor liver grafts including steatotic livers. However, the use of steatotic liver is still controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the impact of steatosis on the outcome of liver transplantation.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of knowledge, and so on for studies published through May 31, 2018, in which patients experienced liver transplantation using fatty liver. All studies extracted outcome indicators, and we draw conclusions by contrasting outcome indicators in different groups of steatosis. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant difference.

Results

19 publications were included. There was no significant difference between the group of no steatosis and mild group in primary nonfunction rate (P=0.605) or early graft dysfunction rate (P=0.44). The PNF rate was significantly higher in moderate group (P=0.003) and severe group (P <0.001) compared with that in no steatosis group. The same results were seen in early graft dysfunction rate. However, graft survival rate and patient survival rate did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

Livers with mild steatosis, even with moderate or severe steatosis, could be suitable donor under strict control of transplant conditions.

Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging to evaluate graft perfusion during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a leading cause of graft loss after liver transplantation. There is no reliable method to anticipate this complication intraoperatively. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is a technique used in hepatobiliary surgery for detection of liver malignancies, but has never been reported in the setting of liver transplantation (LT) for function assessment. We hypothesized that there could be an association between the type of fluorescence and the occurrence of PGD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 72 patients who underwent LT at our center. An assessment of the liver graft with the ICG fluorescence technique was carried out. A classification comprising 3 types of fluorescence was created after evaluation of the recorded images. We assessed the relationship between the type of fluorescence and the occurrence of PGD.

RESULTS

Crosstabulation analysis of the fluorescent types and occurrence of PGD yielded a statistically significant association (p = 0.002). Univariate analysis showed that an abnormal ICG fluorescence pattern was a risk factor for the occurrence of PGD after LT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that there could be an association between ICG fluorescence imaging and graft function. This intraoperative tool could be useful to detect patients at risk of developing PGD after LT.

Hydrogen-rich solution attenuates cold ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat liver transplantation

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) is considered the standard treatment for end-stage liver disease, but ideal donors remain in limited supply, resulting in an unavoidable increase in the need to use grafts from marginal donors. The attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in such marginal donors is therefore crucial for reducing the possibility of the primary non-function of grafts and graft loss. Some reports have found that molecular-hydrogen showed antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in preventing IRI in some non-hepatic transplant models. Therefore, we investigated whether or not molecular-hydrogen could attenuate IRI in LT model rats.

Methods

We used a hydrogen-rich water bath to dissolve hydrogen into solution and graft tissues and performed isogenic and orthotopic LT in Lewis rats with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. Blood and tissue samples were collected 6 h after the reperfusion. Hepatic enzymes in serum were measured. Pathological findings including the expressions of cytokines and heme oxygenase (HO)-1 in liver tissues were evaluated.

Results

The concentration of hydrogen inside the graft tissues increased depending on the storage time, plateauing after 1 h. Serum liver enzyme levels were significantly lower and the histology score of liver damage markedly attenuated in the group given grafts preserved in hydrogen-rich UW solution than in the control group. The hydrogen-rich UW solution group also showed less oxidative damage and hepatocyte apoptosis than the control group, and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines tended to be lower while the protein levels of HO-1 were significantly increased (n = 3–12 per group, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Storage of liver grafts in hydrogen-rich UW solution resulted in superior functional and morphologic protection against IRI via the up-regulation of HO-1 expression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12876-019-0939-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Aged Livers-The Energy Metabolism, Inflammatory Response, and Autophagy

Because of the lack of adequate organs, the number of patients with end-stage liver diseases, acute liver failure or hepatic malignancies waiting for liver transplantation is constantly increasing. Accepting aged liver grafts is one of the strategies expanding the donor pool to ease the discrepancy between the growing demand and the limited supply of donor organs. However, recipients of organs from old donors may show an increased posttransplantation morbidity and mortality due to enhanced ischemia-reperfusion injury. Energy metabolism, inflammatory response, and autophagy are 3 critical processes which are involved in the aging progress as well as in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Compared with young liver grafts, impairment of energy metabolism in aged liver grafts leads to lower adenosine triphosphate production and an enhanced generation of free radicals, both aggravating the inflammatory response. The aggravated inflammatory response determines the extent of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury and augments the liver damage. Autophagy protects cells by removal of damaged organelles, including dysfunctional mitochondria, a process impaired in aging and involved in ischemia-reperfusion-related apoptotic cell death. Furthermore, autophagic degradation of cellular compounds relieves intracellular adenosine triphosphate level for the energy depressed cells. Strategies targeting the mechanisms involved in energy metabolism, inflammatory response, and autophagy might be especially useful to prevent the increased risk for ischemia-reperfusion injury in aged livers after major hepatic surgery.

Graft Dysfunction and Management in Liver Transplantation

Graft dysfunction of the liver allograft manifests across a spectrum in both timing posttransplantation and clinical presentation. This can range from mild transient abnormalities of liver tests to acute liver failure potentially leading to graft failure. The causes of graft dysfunction can be divided into those resulting in early and late graft dysfunction. Although nonspecific, liver biochemistry abnormalities are still the mainstay investigation used in monitoring for dysfunction. This article provides a summary of the main causes and management strategies for liver graft dysfunction in the early through late posttransplant stages.

Cold Ischemia Time as a Factor in Post-transplantation Complications for Orthotopic Hepatic Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare a shorter cold ischemia time with the present one in relation to the complications developed in liver transplantations.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective, observational study of orthotopic liver transplantations performed with grafts from brain-dead donors during 12 months at a University Hospital (Seville). We compare incidence rates of complications (reperfusion syndrome, arterial and biliary complications, and prostaglandin requirements) between two groups according to cold ischemia times (group A < 6 hours; group B > 6 hours).

RESULTS

Sixty cases were included. There were more males in both groups as donors (55.5%) and recipients (75%). The median age was higher in group B in two cases. The Model for End-stage Liver Disease score was higher in patients with a shorter cold ischemia time, with a median of 20 hours (range, 16 to 26.5 hours). We observed that reperfusion syndrome (3.4% vs. 13.3%; P = .353), vascular complications (6.9% vs. 24.1%; P = .144), biliary tract complications (13.8% vs. 20.7%; P = .730), and prostaglandin requirements (3.4% vs. 20.7%; P = .102) were more common in group B, although without reaching statistical significance. After uni- and multivariate analyses, cold ischemia time longer than 6 hours was the only risk factor to develop complications (odds ratio: 3.578; 95% confidence interval: 1.125 to 11.374, P = .031).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of our analysis, cold ischemia times longer than 6 hours, as tends to be the usual procedure in most centers, imply higher rates of complications after liver transplantation.

Evaluation of Graft Effluent High Mobility Group Box-1 (HMGB-1) for Prediction of Outcome After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND Pre-transplant assessment of the graft for liver transplantation is crucial. Based on experimental data, this study was designed to assess both nuclear high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) protein and arginine-specific proteolytic activity (ASPA) in the graft effluent. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a non-interventional trial, both HMGB-1 and ASPA were measured in the effluent of 30 liver grafts after cold storage before transplantation. Values of HMGB-1 and ASPA levels were compared with established prognostic parameters such as the donor risk index, balance of risk score, and Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease. RESULTS The early allograft dysfunction (EAD) was best predicted by recipient age (p=0.026) and HMGB-1 (p=0.031). HMGB -1 thresholds indicated the likelihood for initial non-function (1608 ng/ml, p=0.004) and EAD (580 ng/ml, p=0.017). The multivariate binary regression analysis showed a 21-fold higher (95% CI: 1.6-284.5, p=0.022) risk for EAD in cases with levels exceeding 580 ng/ml. The ASPA was lower in cases of initial non-function (p=0.028) but did not correlate with the rate of EAD (p=0.4). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of HMGB-1 detection in the graft effluent after cold storage. Along with conventional prognostic scores, it may be helpful to predict the early fate of a graft in human liver transplantation.

Impact of Functional Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction on Perioperative Outcome After Living-Donor Liver Transplant

OBJECTIVES

An optimal initial graft function after living-donor liver transplant depends on optimal graft hemodynamics. Nonmechanical impediments to free hepatic venous outflow, due to elevated central venous pressure, may obstruct the "functional" hepatic venous outflow. Here, we evaluated whether central venous pressure affected early graft function and outcomes in adult living-donor liver transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study included 61 living-donor liver transplant recipients without technical complications who received transplants from August 2013 to November 2014. Hemodynamic variables were measured preoperatively, at anhepatic phase, 30 minutes postreperfusion, at end of surgery, and during postoperative days 1-5.

RESULTS

Patients with high central venous pressure showed functional hepatic venous outflow obstruction, which caused delayed recovery of graft function. Although postoperative central venous pressure was the only identified independent risk factor for mortality, all 5 deaths in our study group occurred in those who had high central venous pressure at the anhepatic, postreperfusion, end of surgery, and postoperative phases. A postoperative central venous pressure value of ~11 mm Hg was determined to be the cutoff for high-risk mortality, with area under the curve of 0.859 (sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 68%). Increased central venous pressure was associated with increased portal venous pressure (increase of 45%, range, 28%-89%; P = .001). Central venous pressure at end of surgery (r = 0.45, P ≤ .001) and at posttransplant time points (r = 0.29, P = .02) correlated well with portal venous pressure at end of surgery. Other risk factors for early allograft dysfunction were Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and cardiac output posttransplant.

CONCLUSIONS

High central venous pressure, modulating portal venous pressure, can result in functional hepatic venous outflow obstruction, causing delayed graft function recovery and increased risk of mortality. Maintaining a central venous pressure below 11 mm Hg is beneficial.

The combination of indocyanine green clearance test and model for end-stage liver disease score predicts early graft outcome after liver transplantation

Early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and early postoperative complications are two important clinical endpoints when evaluating clinical outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). We developed and validated two ICGR15-MELD models in 87 liver transplant recipients for predicting EAD and early postoperative complications after LT by incorporating the quantitative liver function tests (ICGR15) into the MELD score. Eighty seven consecutive patients who underwent LT were collected and divided into a training cohort (n = 61) and an internal validation cohort (n = 26). For predicting EAD after LT, the area under curve (AUC) for ICGR15-MELD score was 0.876, with a sensitivity of 92.0% and a specificity of 75.0%, which is better than MELD score or ICGR15 alone. The recipients with a ICGR15-MELD score ≥0.243 have a higher incidence of EAD than those with a ICGR15-MELD score <0.243 (P <0.001). For predicting early postoperative complications, the AUC of ICGR15-MELD score was 0.832, with a sensitivity of 90.9% and a specificity of 71.0%. Those recipients with an ICGR15-MELD score ≥0.098 have a higher incidence of early postoperative complications than those with an ICGR15-MELD score <0.098 (P < 0.001). Finally, application of the two ICGR15-MELD models in the validation cohort still gave good accuracy (AUC, 0.835 and 0.826, respectively) in predicting EAD and early postoperative complications after LT. The combination of quantitative liver function tests (ICGR15) and the preoperative MELD score is a reliable and effective predictor of EAD and early postoperative complications after LT, which is better than MELD score or ICGR15 alone.

Improving the Diagnostic Criteria for Primary Liver Graft Nonfunction in Adults Utilizing Standard and Transportable Laboratory Parameters: An Outcome-Based Analysis

Current diagnostic criteria for primary nonfunction (PNF) of liver grafts are based on clinical experience rather than statistical methods. A retrospective, single-center study was conducted of all adults (n = 1286) who underwent primary liver transplant (LT) 2000-2008 in our center. Laboratory variables during the first post LT week were analyzed. Forty-two patients (3.7%) had 2-week graft failure. Transplant albumin, day-1 aspartate aminotransferase (AST), day-1 lactate, day-3 bilirubin, day-3 international normalized ratio (INR), and day-7 AST were independently associated with PNF on multivariate logistic regression. PNF score =(0.000280*D1AST)+ (0.361*D1 Lactate)+(0.00884*D3 Bilirubin)+(0.940*D3 INR)+(0.00153*D7 AST)-(0.0972*TxAlbumin)-4.5503. Receiver operating curve analysis showed the model area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.912 (0.889-0.932) was superior to the current United Kingdom (UK) PNF criteria of 0.669 (0.634-0.704, p < 0.0001). When applied to a validation cohort (n = 386, 34.4% patients), the model had AUROC of 0.831 (0.789-0.867) compared to the UK early graft dysfunction criteria of 0.674 (0.624-0.721). The new model performed well after exclusion of patients with marginal grafts and when modified to include variables from the first three post-LT days only (AUROC of 0.818, 0.776-0.856, p = 0.001). This model is superior to the current UK PNF criteria and is based on statistical methods. The model is also applicable to recipients of all types of grafts (marginal and nonmarginal).

Retraction: "Safety limitations of fatty liver transplantation can be extended to 40%: Experience of a single centre in China", by Yu Z., Yu S., Zhang L., Feng X., Zhang M., et al

The above article, published online on 13 October 2016 in Wiley OnlineLibrary (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Mario U. Mondelli, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. see accompanying Editorial Note It has come to the attention of the Editors that the article may have contained data referring to the use of organs retrieved from executed prisoners and not from donors after cardiac death (DCD), thus breaching international organ donation ethical standards. Further information is contained in the accompanying Editorial link. REFERENCE Yu Z, Sun Z, Yu S, et al. Safety limitations of fatty liver transplantation can be extended to 40%: experience of a single centre in China. Liver Int. 2016; doi: 10.1111/liv.13244.

Geographic Variation in Cold Ischemia Time: Kidney vs. Liver Transplantation in the United States, 2003-2011

Background

Regional variations in kidney and liver transplant outcomes have been reported, but their causes remain largely unknown. This study investigated variations in kidney and liver cold ischemia times (CITs) across organ procurement organizations (OPO) as potential causes of variations in transplant outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed the Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data of deceased donor kidney (n = 61,335) and liver (n = 39,285) transplants performed between 2003 and 2011. The CIT variations between the 2 types of organs were examined and compared. Factors associated with CIT were explored using multivariable regressions. Spearman rank tests were used to associate CIT with graft failure at the OPO level.

Results

Significant CIT variations were found across OPOs for both organs (P < 0.05). The variation was particularly large for kidney CIT. Those OPOs with longer average kidney CIT were likely to have a lower graft survival rate (P = 0.01). For liver, this association was insignificant (P = 0.23). The regression analysis revealed sharp contrasts between the factors associated with kidney and liver CITs. High-risk kidney transplant recipients and marginal kidneys were associated with longer average CIT. The reverse was true for liver transplants.

Conclusions

Large variations in kidney CIT compared to liver CIT may indicate that there is a room to reduce kidney CIT. Reducing kidney CIT through managerial improvements could be a cost-effective way to improve the current transplant system.

A systematic review of pharmacological treatment options used to reduce ischemia reperfusion injury in rat liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although animal studies models are frequently used for the purpose of attenuating ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) in liver transplantation (LT), many of pharmacological agents have not become part of clinical routine.

METHODS

A search was performed using the PubMed database to identify agents, from which 58 articles containing 2700 rat LT procedures were selected. The identified pharmacological agents were categorized as follows: I - adenosine agonists, nitric oxide agonists, endothelin antagonists, and prostaglandins, II - Kupffer cell inactivator, III - complement inhibiter, IV - antioxidant, V - neutrophil inactivator, VI -anti-apoptosis agent, VII - heat shock protein and nuclear factor kappa B inducer, VIII - metabolic agent, IX - traditional Chinese medicine, and X - others. Meta-analysis using 7-day-survival rate was also performed with Mantel-Haenszel's Random effects model.

RESULTS

The categorization revealed that the rate of donor-treated experiments in each group was highest for agents from Group II (70%) and VII (71%), whereas it was higher for agents from Group V (83%) in the recipient-treated experiments. Furthermore, 90% of the experiments with agents in Group II provided 7-day-survival benefits. The Risk Ratio (RR) of the meta-analysis was 2.43 [95% CI: 1.88-3.14] with moderate heterogeneity. However, the RR of each of the studies was too model-dependent to be used in the search for the most promising pharmacological agent.

CONCLUSION

With regard to hepatic IRI pathology, the categorization of agents of interest would be a first step in designing suitable multifactorial and pleiotropic approaches to develop pharmacological strategies.

Donor selection criteria for liver transplantation in Argentina: are current standards too rigorous?

Organ shortage is the major limitation for the growth of deceased donor liver transplant worldwide. One strategy to ameliorate this problem is to maximize the liver utilization rate. To assess predictors of liver utilization in Argentina. The national database was used to analyze transplant activity in 2010. Donor, recipient, and transplant variables were evaluated as predictors of graft utilization of number of rejected donor offers before grafting and with the occurrence of primary nonfunction (PNF) or early post-transplant mortality (EM). Of the 582 deceased donors, 293 (50.3%) were recovered for liver transplant. Variables associated with the nonrecovery of the liver were age ≥46 years, umbilical perimeter ≥92 cm, organ procurement outside Gran Buenos Aires, AST ≥42 U/l and ALT ≥29 U/l. The median number of rejected offers before grafting was 4, and in 71 patients (25%), there were ≥13. The only independent predictor for the occurrence of PNF (3.4%) or EM (5.2%) was the recipient's emergency status. During 2010 in Argentina, the liver was recovered in only half of donors. The low incidence of PNF and EM and the characteristics of the nonrecovered liver donors suggest that organ acceptance criteria should be less rigorous.

Care of the liver transplant patient

OBJECTIVE

To provide an approach to the care of liver transplant (LT) patients, a growing patient population with unique needs.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed for guidelines and review articles using the keywords "liver transplantation", "long term complications" and "medical management" was conducted, resulting in 77 articles.

RESULTS

As a result of being on immunosuppression, LT recipients are at increased risk of infections and must be screened regularly for metabolic complications and malignancies.

DISCUSSION

Although immunosuppression is key to maintaining allograft health after transplantation, it comes with its own set of medical issues to follow. Physicians following LT recipients must be aware of the greater risk for hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, renal failure, metabolic bone disease and malignancies in these patients, all of whom require regular monitoring and screening. Vaccination, quality of life, sexual function and pregnancy must be specifically addressed in transplant patients.

Primary graft dysfunction after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) causes complications in liver transplantation, which result in poor prognosis. Recipients who develop PGD usually experience a longer intensive care unit and hospital stay and have higher mortality and graft loss rates compared with those without graft dysfunction. However, because of the lack of universally accepted definition, early diagnosis of graft dysfunction is difficult. Additionally, numerous factors affect the allograft function after transplantation, making the prediction of PGD more difficult. The present review was to analyze the literature available on PGD and to propose a definition.

DATA SOURCE

A search of PubMed (up to the end of 2012) for English-language articles relevant to PGD was performed to clarify the characteristics, risk factors, and possible treatments or interventions for PGD.

RESULTS

There is no pathological diagnostic standard; many documented definitions of PGD are different. Many factors, such as donor status, procurement and transplant process and recipient illness may affect the function of graft, and ischemia-reperfusion injury is considered the direct cause. Potential managements which are helpful to improve graft function were investigated. Some of them are promising.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses suggested that the definition of PGD should include one or more of the following variables: (1) bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dL on postoperative day 7; (2) international normalized ratio ≥ 1.6 on postoperative day 7; and (3) alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >2000 IU/L within 7 postoperative days. Reducing risk factors may decrease the incidence of PGD. A majority of the recipients could recover from PGD; however, when the graft progresses into primary non-function, the patients need to be treated with re-transplantation.

A Bayesian methodology to improve prediction of early graft loss after liver transplantation derived from the liver match study

BACKGROUND

To generate a robust predictive model of Early (3 months) Graft Loss after liver transplantation, we used a Bayesian approach to combine evidence from a prospective European cohort (Liver-Match) and the United Network for Organ Sharing registry.

METHODS

Liver-Match included 1480 consecutive primary liver transplants performed from 2007 to 2009 and the United Network for Organ Sharing a time-matched series of 9740 transplants. There were 173 and 706 Early Graft Loss, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified as significant predictors of Early Graft Loss: donor age, donation after cardiac death, cold ischaemia time, donor body mass index and height, recipient creatinine, bilirubin, disease aetiology, prior upper abdominal surgery and portal thrombosis.

RESULTS

A Bayesian Cox model was fitted to Liver-Match data using the United Network for Organ Sharing findings as prior information, allowing to generate an Early Graft Loss-Donor Risk Index and an Early Graft Loss-Recipient Risk Index. A Donor-Recipient Allocation Model, obtained by adding Early Graft Loss-Donor Risk Index to Early Graft Loss-Recipient Risk Index, was then validated in a distinct United Network for Organ Sharing (year 2010) cohort including 2964 transplants. Donor-Recipient Allocation Model updating using the independent Turin Transplant Centre dataset, allowed to predict Early Graft Loss with good accuracy (c-statistic: 0.76).

CONCLUSION

Donor-Recipient Allocation Model allows a reliable donor and recipient-based Early Graft Loss prediction. The Bayesian approach permits to adapt the original Donor-Recipient Allocation Model by incorporating evidence from other cohorts, resulting in significantly improved predictive capability.

A critical analysis of early death after adult liver transplants

INTRODUCTION

The 15% mortality rate of liver transplant recipients at one yr may be viewed as a feat in comparison with the waiting list mortality, yet it nonetheless leaves room for much improvement. Our aim was to critically examine the mortality rates to identify high-risk periods and to incorporate cause of death into the analysis of post-transplant survival.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on United Network for Organ Sharing data for all adult recipients of liver transplants from January 1, 2002 to October 31, 2011. Our analysis included multivariate logistic regression where the primary outcome measure was patient death of 49,288 recipients.

RESULTS

The highest mortality rate by day post-transplant was on day 0 (0.9%). The most significant risk factors were as follows: for one-d mortality from technical failure, intensive care unit admission odds ratio (OR 3.2); for one-d mortality from graft failure, warm ischemia >75 min (OR 5.6); for one-month mortality from infection, a previous transplant (OR 3.3); and for one-month mortality from graft failure, a previous transplant (OR 3.7).

CONCLUSION

We found that the highest mortality rate after liver transplantation is within the first day and the first month post-transplant. Those two high-risk periods have common, as well as different, risk factors for mortality.

A proposal to grade the severity of early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation

Objective:

To propose a grading system for early hepatic graft dysfunction.

Methods:

A retrospective study from a single transplant center. Recipients of liver transplants from deceased donors, transplanted under the MELD system were included. Early graft dysfunction was defined by Olthoff criteria. Multiple cut-off points of post-transplant laboratory tests were used to create a grading system for early graft dysfunction. The primary outcome was 6-months grafts survival.

Results:

The peak of aminotransferases during the first postoperative week correlated with graft loss. The recipients were divided into mild (aminotransferase peak >2,000IU/mL, but <3,000IU/mL); moderate (aminotransferase peak >3,000IU/mL); and severe (aminotransferase peak >3,000IU/mL + International Normalized Ratio ≥1.6 and/or bilirubin ≥ 10mg/dL in the 7^th postoperative day) early allograft dysfunction. Moderate and severe early dysfunctions were independent risk factors for graft loss. Patients with mild early dysfunction presented with graft and patient survival comparable to those without graft dysfunction. However, those with moderate early graft dysfunction showed worse graft survival than those who had no graft dysfunction. Patients with severe early dysfunction had graft and patient survival rates worse than those of any other groups.

Conclusion:

Early graft dysfunction can be graded by a simple and reliable criteria based on the peak of aminotransferases during the first postoperative week. The severity of the early graft dysfunction is an independent risk factor for allograft loss. Patients with moderate early dysfunction showed worsening of graft survival. Recipients with severe dysfunction had a significantly worse prognosis for graft and patient survival.

The PRAISE study: a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled study for the evaluation of iloprost in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation (ISRCTN12622749)

Background

Liver graft dysfunction can deteriorate to complete organ failure and increases perioperative morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Therapeutic strategies reducing the rate of graft dysfunction are of current clinical relevance. One approach is the systemic application of prostaglandins, which were demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Preliminary data indicate a positive effect of prostacyclin analogue iloprost on allograft viability after liver transplantation. The objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of iloprost in a multi-center trial.

Methods/Design

A prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study in a total of 365 liver transplant recipients was designed to assess the effect of intravenous iloprost after liver transplantation. Primary endpoint will be the primary graft dysfunction characterized as presentation of one or more of the following criteria: ALAT or ASAT level > 2000 IU/ml within the first 7 postoperative days, bilirubine ≥ 10 mg/dl on postoperative day 7; INR ≥ 1.6 on postoperative day 7 or initial non-function. Secondary endpoints are parameters of post-transplant morbidity, like rates of infections, biliary complications, need of clotting factors or renal replacement therapy and the graft and patient survival.

Discussion

A well-established treatment concept to avoid graft dysfunction after liver transplantation does not exist at the moment. If the data of this research project confirm prior findings, iloprost would improve the general outcome after liver transplantation.

Trial Registration

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00003514. Current Controlled Trials Register: ISRCTN12622749.

MELD-based graft allocation system fails to improve liver transplantation efficacy in a single-center intent-to-treat analysis

BACKGROUND

Since March 2007, priority access to liver transplantation in France has been given to patients with the highest MELD scores.

OBJECTIVE

To undertake an intent-to-treat comparison of center-based vs. MELD-based liver graft allocation.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis (patients listed 6th March 2007 to 5th March 2009; MELD period) with a matched historical cohort (patients listed 6th March 2005 to 5th March 2007; pre-MELD period) in a single high-volume center. Analysis was on an intent-to-treat basis, i.e. starting on the day of wait listing.

RESULTS

Compared to pre-MELD, fewer patients with a MELD score less or equal to 14 (P=0.002), and more patients with a MELD greater or equal to 24 (P<0.05) were transplanted during the MELD period. For HCC candidates, median waiting time increased (121 vs. 54 days, P=0.01), transplantation rate halved (35% vs. 73.5%, P<0.001) and dropouts due to tumor progression increased (16% vs. 0%, P<0.001). Moreover, postoperative course did not change significantly except for infectious complications (35% vs. 24%, P=0.02); overall patient survival was 69.8 ± 3.1% vs. 76 ± 2.9% (P=0.29) and overall graft survival was 77.6 ± 3.4% vs. 82.8 ± 2.9% (P=0.29). Transplant failures were mainly due to deaths on the waiting list in the previous system, but to dropouts related to disease progression in the new system. Cirrhotic patient survival rate did not change (78.1 ± 4.4% vs. 73.5 ± 4.5%, P=0.42), while that of HCC patients decreased (65.3 ± 5.3% vs. 86.8 ± 4.4%, P=0.01). Post-transplant survival worsened significantly according to pre-transplant MELD score (P=0.009).

CONCLUSION

The MELD-based graft allocation system introduced discrimination against HCC patients, whose incidence has increased dramatically, and should be reevaluated.

Impact of stable PGI₂ analog iloprost on early graft viability after liver transplantation: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Ischemia/reperfusion injury after liver transplantation (LT) may be associated with primary graft dysfunction (PDF) or non-function. Prostaglandins were demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing ischemic injury by improving microcirculation and protecting endothelial cells. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of the continuously administered prostaglandin I(2) analog iloprost on allograft function after LT.

METHODS

Eighty patients were prospectively randomized and assigned to two groups. Patients in the treatment group received iloprost for seven d after transplantation, and those in the control group did not. The primary end point was graft dysfunction.

RESULTS

The incidence of PDF was 20% (n = 8) in the control group and 5% (n = 2) in the treatment group, respectively (p = 0.087). Four patients in the control group underwent re-transplantation for initial non-function (INF). There was no evidence for INF in the treatment group. Iloprost was associated with improved allograft function. Clinical course and outcome were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest iloprost to be beneficial for early post-transplant liver function. If the rate of PDF can be significantly reduced with this treatment concept, it should be analyzed in a larger number of patients (ISRCTN95672167).