Lessons from the CAESAR Study: calcineurin inhibitors--can't live with them and can't live without them

Belatacept : a new biological agent for maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decades, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have become the cornerstone of transplant immunosuppression. CNIs can exert negative effects on chronic allograft function along with cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic adverse effects. Belatacept , a selective co-stimulation blocker of T cells, is the first US FDA (06/2011) and EMEA (06/2011) approved biologic agent for maintenance immunosuppression in renal transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

The authors critically reviewed the literature over the last few years comparing belatacept with current standard of maintenance immunosuppression including CNIs in kidney transplantation.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the increased incidence and severity of acute rejection with belatacept in Phase II and III studies, a better preservation of GFR and reduced incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy was observed as compared with CNIs. Patient and graft survivals were similar over 3- and 5-year follow-up post-transplantation. Incidence of adverse events were similar between the groups, but the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, predominantly involving CNS, was higher in Epstein-Barr virus seronegative recipients on belatacept, especially with a more intensive regimen. CV and metabolic end points were more favorable in belatacept versus CNI groups with similar incidences of diabetes after transplantation. Belatacept seems to be a promising drug for the future, but long-term outcomes are awaited.

Co-stimulation blockade as a new strategy in kidney transplantation: benefits and limits

New immunosuppressive drugs have greatly decreased the frequency of graft failure due to acute rejection but have had little impact on long-term graft survival. This is due, at least in part, to the broad non-immune effects of the current immunosuppressive drugs, which are involved in the death of patients and in chronic allograft dysfunction, particularly due to their nephrotoxicity. Recent progress in the development of biologicals, i.e. antibodies and fusion proteins, allows precise targeting of the immune system, preventing the non-immune side effects encountered with current protocols. In particular, targeting of the two most important co-stimulation pathways critical for T-cell activation, i.e. B7/CD28 and CD40/CD40L, has provided excellent results in many experimental models of organ transplantation. This has led to the clinical development of belatacept, a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) fusion protein, which has proved to be efficient in preventing acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Its use is associated with improved renal function and a better metabolic profile than calcineurin inhibitors. However, because belatacept does not selectively target alloreactive T lymphocytes and must be combined with classical immunosuppressive drugs, infectious and neoplastic complications may occur, particularly post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders. We also address the current development of molecules targeting other co-stimulatory pathways (CD40/CD40L, leukocyte function-associated antigen [LFA]-1/intercellular adhesion molecule [ICAM], CD2/LFA-3). Many unresolved issues regarding the use of co-stimulation blocking agents are also discussed, e.g. their long half-life, which can be problematic in cases of serious adverse events, their long-term safety and efficacy, and the lack of monitoring tools to allow modulation of their use over time.

Impact of daclizumab, low-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids on renal function after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early and long-term use of cyclosporine A (CsA) leads to increased risks of renal toxicity. We hypothesized that administration of daclizumab in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows a relevant reduction in the dose of CsA.

METHODS

We carried out a 3-year, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical multi-centre trial in 156 patients. The patients were randomized to standard treatment (CsA, MMF, steroids) or to high-dose daclizumab (first dose: 2 mg/kg), in combination with low-dose CsA, MMF and steroids. We maintained the mean CsA levels of daclizumab patients at 57% of standard patients (132 versus 216 ng/ml) on Day 7 post-transplant, and 84% by 6 months.

RESULTS

Primary outcome, creatinine clearance (with imputation of informative dropouts) at 12 months, was significantly better in daclizumab-treated (34 +/- 17) than standard patients (29 +/- 17; P = 0.028, two sided). Only 5 cases of BPAR were recorded in the daclizumab compared to 22 in the standard group (P = 0.0016). Daclizumab patients had 91% event-free survival after 1 year compared to 66% in standard patients (P = 0.00017).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate here that high-dose daclizumab in combination with lower CsA levels in adult renal transplant recipients is as or more effective than standard regimen (CsA, MMF, steroids) and may result in better outcomes at 12 months post-transplant with no increase in adverse reactions.