1
|
Bechman K, Galloway JB, Winthrop KL. Small-Molecule Protein Kinases Inhibitors and the Risk of Fungal Infections. CURRENT FUNGAL INFECTION REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s12281-019-00350-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
This review discusses fungal infections associated with licenced small-molecule protein kinase inhibitors. For each major drug class, the mechanism of action and targeted pathways and the impact on host defence against fungi are described.
Recent Findings
Protein kinase inhibitors are successfully used in the treatment of malignancies and immune-mediated diseases, targeting signalling pathways for a broad spectrum of cytokines and growth-stimuli. These agents predispose to fungal infections by the suppression of integral components of the adaptive and innate immune response.
Summary
The greatest risk of fungal infections is seen with bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, e.g. ibrutinib. Infections are also reported with agents that target mTOR, Janus kinase and break point cluster (Bcr) gene–Abelson (Abl) tyrosine kinase (BCR-ABL). The type of fungal infection fits mechanistically with the specific pathway targeted. Infections are often disseminated and present soon after the initiation of therapy. The pharmacokinetic profile, possibility of off-target kinase inhibition, and underlying disease pathology contribute to infection risk.
Collapse
|
2
|
Chronic renal insufficiency in heart transplant recipients: risk factors and management options. Drugs 2015; 74:1481-94. [PMID: 25134671 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-014-0274-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Renal dysfunction after heart transplantation is a frequently observed complication, in some cases resulting in significant limitation of quality of life and reduced survival. Since the pathophysiology of renal failure (RF) is multifactorial, the current etiologic paradigm for chronic kidney disease after heart transplantation relies on the concept of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related nephrotoxicity acting on a predisposed recipient. Until recently, the management of RF has been restricted to the minimization of CNI dosage and general avoidance of classic nephrotoxic risk factors, with somewhat limited success. The recent introduction of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSIs) (sirolimus and everolimus), a new class of immunosuppressive drugs lacking intrinsic nephrotoxicity, has provided a completely new alternative in this clinical setting. As clinical experience with these new drugs increases, new renal-sparing strategies are becoming available. PSIs can be used in combination with reduced doses of CNIs and even in complete CNI-free protocols. Different strategies have been devised, including de novo use to avoid acute renal toxicity in high-risk patients immediately after transplantation, or more delayed introduction in those patients developing chronic RF after prolonged CNI exposure. In this review, the main information on the clinical relevance and pathophysiology of RF after heart transplantation, as well as the currently available experience with renal-sparing immunosuppressive regimens, particularly focused on the use of PSIs, is reviewed and summarized, including the key practical points for their appropriate clinical usage.
Collapse
|
3
|
Prospective Study of Everolimus With Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Immunosuppression After Heart Transplantation: Results at Four Years. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97:888-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
4
|
Gonzalez-Vilchez F, Vazquez de Prada JA, Paniagua MJ, Gomez-Bueno M, Arizon JM, Almenar L, Roig E, Delgado J, Lambert JL, Perez-Villa F, Sanz-Julve ML, Crespo-Leiro M, Segovia J, Lopez-Granados A, Martinez-Dolz L, Mirabet S, Escribano P, Diaz-Molina B, Farrero M, Blasco T. Use of mTOR inhibitors in chronic heart transplant recipients with renal failure: calcineurin-inhibitors conversion or minimization? Int J Cardiol 2013; 171:15-23. [PMID: 24309084 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Revised: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last decade, mTOR inhibitors (mTOR-is) have become the cornerstone of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-reduced/free regimens aimed to the preservation of post-transplant renal function. We compared utility and safety of the total replacement of calcineurin inhibitors with a mTOR-i with a strategy based on calcineurin inhibitor minimization and concomitant use of m-TOR-i. METHODS In a retrospective multi-center cohort of 394 maintenance cardiac recipients with renal failure (GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), we compared 235 patients in whom CNI was replaced with a mTOR-i (sirolimus or everolimus) with 159 patients in whom mTOR-is were used to minimize CNIs. A propensity score analysis was carried out to balance between group differences. RESULTS Overall, after a median time of 2 years from mTOR-i initiation, between group differences for the evolution of renal function were not observed. In a multivariate adjusted model, improvement of renal function was limited to patients with mTOR-i usage within 5years after transplantation, particularly with the conversion strategy, and in those patients who could maintain mTOR-i therapy. Significant differences between strategies were not found for mortality, infection and mTOR-i withdrawal due to drug-related adverse events. However, conversion group tended to have a higher acute rejection incidence than the minimization group (p=0.07). CONCLUSION In terms of renal benefits, our results support an earlier use of mTOR-is, irrespective of the strategy. The selection of either a conversion or a CNI minimization protocol should be based on the clinical characteristics of the patients, particularly their rejection risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Gonzalez-Vilchez
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Instituto de Formación e Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IFIMAV), Santander, Spain.
| | - J A Vazquez de Prada
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Instituto de Formación e Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IFIMAV), Santander, Spain
| | - M J Paniagua
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital de La Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - M Gomez-Bueno
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - J M Arizon
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
| | - L Almenar
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - E Roig
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Delgado
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - J L Lambert
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - F Perez-Villa
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M L Sanz-Julve
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - M Crespo-Leiro
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital de La Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - J Segovia
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Lopez-Granados
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain
| | - L Martinez-Dolz
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Mirabet
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Escribano
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - B Diaz-Molina
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - M Farrero
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Blasco
- Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Cardiology Service, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thibodeau JT, Mishkin JD, Patel PC, Kaiser PA, Ayers CR, Mammen PPA, Markham DW, Ring WS, Peltz M, Drazner MH. Tolerability of sirolimus: a decade of experience at a single cardiac transplant center. Clin Transplant 2013; 27:945-52. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph D. Mishkin
- Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiology; Dallas TX USA
| | - Parag C. Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiology; Dallas TX USA
| | | | - Colby R. Ayers
- Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiology; Dallas TX USA
| | | | - David W. Markham
- Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiology; Dallas TX USA
| | - William Steves Ring
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas TX USA
| | - Matthias Peltz
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas TX USA
| | - Mark H. Drazner
- Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiology; Dallas TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schumacher KR, Gajarski RJ. Postoperative care of the transplanted patient. Curr Cardiol Rev 2013; 7:110-22. [PMID: 22548034 PMCID: PMC3197086 DOI: 10.2174/157340311797484286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2010] [Revised: 06/09/2011] [Accepted: 06/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The successful delivery of optimal peri-operative care to pediatric heart transplant recipients is a vital determinant of their overall outcomes. The practitioner caring for these patients must be familiar with and treat multiple simultaneous issues in a patient who may have been critically ill preoperatively. In addition to the complexities involved in treating any child following cardiac surgery, caretakers of newly transplanted patients encounter multiple transplant-specific issues. This chapter details peri-operative management strategies, frequently encountered early morbidities, initiation of immunosuppression including induction, and short-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
7
|
Thibodeau JT, Mishkin JD, Patel PC, Kaiser PA, Ayers CR, Mammen PPA, Markham DW, Ring WS, Peltz M, Drazner MH. Sirolimus use and incidence of venous thromboembolism in cardiac transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2012; 26:953-9. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2012.01677.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2012] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer T. Thibodeau
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Joseph D. Mishkin
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Parag C. Patel
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Patricia A. Kaiser
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Colby R. Ayers
- Department of Clinical Sciences; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Pradeep P. A. Mammen
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - David W. Markham
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - W. Steves Ring
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Matthias Peltz
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| | - Mark H. Drazner
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Internal Medicine; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas; TX; USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gareau AJ, Nashan B, Hirsch GM, Lee TDG. Cyclosporine immunosuppression does not prevent the production of donor-specific antibody capable of mediating allograft vasculopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012; 31:874-80. [PMID: 22554675 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2011] [Revised: 03/11/2012] [Accepted: 03/31/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late cardiac graft rejection, primarily mediated by allograft vasculopathy (AV), remains a major limitation to cardiac transplantation, even in the face of significant calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) immunosuppression. The role played by alloantibody in AV is unclear. Evidence that CNI immunosuppression suppresses CD4(+) T-cell function would suggest that antibody production and effector function would be severely limited in CNI-treated patients. In this study we examine the capacity of CNI-treated animals to develop effective alloantibody that can mediate AV. METHODS Wild-type (WT) B6 mice were alloimmunized using donor splenocytes or a fully major histocompatibility complex-mismatched allogeneic abdominal aortic graft in the presence of CNI immunosuppression (30 or 50 mg/kg/day cyclosporine A). Anti-serum was harvested and tested using complement-dependent in vitro cytotoxicity assays. Anti-serum was passively transferred to immunodeficient RAG1(-/-) recipients of allogeneic grafts. C4d deposition was quantified in the allografts from WT recipients. RESULTS CNI immunosuppression did not prevent the development of alloantibody in response to either immunization method (p < 0.05). Passive transfer of anti-serum generated AV lesions in immunodeficient graft recipients and mediated complement-dependent destruction of donor cells (p < 0.05). C4d deposition was localized to the media of grafts of CNI treated animals. CONCLUSIONS CNI therapy does not prevent the production of alloantibody with the capacity to mediate AV. C4d deposition in the media suggests a role for medial smooth muscle cell loss in antibody-mediated AV lesion development in our model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison J Gareau
- Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression using everolimus (Certican) after heart transplantation: 2 years' follow-up from the University Hospital Münster. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:1847-52. [PMID: 21693288 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2010] [Accepted: 12/20/2010] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Everolimus is a proliferation-signal inhibitor which was introduced for heart transplant recipients in 2004. To date, there are only sparse data about long-term calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free immunosuppression using everolimus. METHODS After heart transplantation, patients receiving everolimus were consecutively enrolled. Reasons for switching to everolimus were side effects of CNI immunosuppression, such as deterioration of kidney function and recurrent rejection episodes. All 60 patients underwent standardized switching protocols, 42 patients completed 24-month follow-up. Blood was sampled for lipid status, renal function, routine controls, and levels of immunosuppressive agents. On days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 3 months, echocardiography and physical examination were performed. RESULTS After switching to everolimus, most patients recovered from the side effects. Renal function improved significantly after 24 months (creatinine, 2.1 ± 0.6 vs 1.8 ± 1 mg/dL; P < .001; creatinine clearance, 41.8 ± 22 vs 48.6 ± 21.8 mL/min; P < .001). Median blood pressure increased from 120.0/75.0 mm Hg at baseline to 123.8/80.0 mm Hg at month 24 (P values .008 and .003 for systolic and diastolic pressures, respectively). Tremor, peripheral edema, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia markedly improved. Levels of interleukin-6 were stable between baseline and 24-month levels. Temporary adverse events occurred in 8 patients [13.3%: interstitial pneumonia (n = 2), skin disorders (n = 2); reactivated hepatitis B (n = 1), and fever of unknown origin (n = 3)]. CONCLUSION CNI-free immunosuppression using everolimus is safe, with excellent efficacy in maintenance of heart transplant recipients. Arterial hypertension and renal function significantly improved. CNI-induced side effects, such as tremor, peripheral edema, hirsutism, and gingival hyperplasia, markedly improved in most patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Prospective study of everolimus with calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in maintenance heart transplant patients: results at 2 years. Transplantation 2011; 91:1159-65. [PMID: 21478817 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e31821774bd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined everolimus therapy with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal in maintenance heart transplant patients. METHODS In a prospective, single-arm, single-center study, CNI-treated heart transplant patients were converted to everolimus and were followed up for 24 months. The primary endpoints were kidney function and arterial hypertension at 12 and 24 months after conversion. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were recruited (mean time posttransplant 5.6±3.7 years), 55 of whom (91.7%) had renal impairment. Mean creatinine clearance increased from 43.6±21.1 mL/min to 49.5±21.2 mL/min at month 24 (P=0.02). Median blood pressure increased from 120/80 mm Hg at baseline to 122.5/80 mm Hg (P=0.008 and 0.006 for systolic and diastolic pressure, respectively). Lipid parameters did not change significantly over the 24-month follow-up. Early resolution of most non-renal CNI-related adverse events was sustained. CNI therapy was re-introduced at a mean of 309 days (range, 31-684 days) in eight patients after month 6 due to adverse events (n=13) or withdrawal of consent (n=2). No significant changes in cardiac function parameters were observed. CONCLUSIONS CNI-free immunosuppression with everolimus is an effective and safe option in selected heart transplant maintenance patients. Most adverse effects under everolimus occurred early after conversion and generally resolved without intervention within a few weeks. Refining selection criteria may reduce the need to re-introduce CNI therapy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hornum M, Andersen M, Gustafsson F, Oturai P, Sander K, Mortensen S, Feldt-Rasmussen B. Rapid Decline in Glomerular Filtration Rate during the First Weeks Following Heart Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:1904-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.02.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2011] [Accepted: 02/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This paper briefly and subjectively reviews a number of the modest or tentative, but noteworthy, advances in heart transplantation that have been made during the past 18 months or so. RECENT FINDINGS The advances reviewed concern the selection of recipients, the management of the heart transplantation waiting list, the management of donors, post-heart transplant monitoring of immunological status, the early diagnosis of rejection, the role of mammalian target of rapamycine inhibitors and induction agents, and the definition and grading of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. SUMMARY The findings reviewed indicate progress in the clarification of issues that were in most cases already being investigated. Further studies will in general be needed before corresponding measures are adopted in clinical practice.
Collapse
|
13
|
Matthews K, Gossett J, Kappelle PV, Jellen G, Pahl E. Indications, tolerance and complications of a sirolimus and calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression regimen: intermediate experience in pediatric heart transplantation recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2010; 14:402-8. [PMID: 20214748 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01306.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Although SRL has been used in adults, few studies are reported in pediatric Htx recipients. Retrospective chart review of all Htx patients on SRL. We evaluated Cr at Htx and years 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15 post-Htx. GFR was calculated (Schwartz). BMI, Hgb, lipid profiles, and complications were compared to 59 controls, and a matched case-control group used to compare GFR to SRL cohort. Twenty-one patients were converted to SRL 1-2 mg/day (target 4-8 ng/mL) and analyzed. Reasons for conversion: re-transplantation/TCAD (8), renal (7), rejection (5), other (1). Cr was higher (p = 0.004) and GFR lower (p = 0.025) in SRL group than controls at Htx. Patients began SRL a median of 3.6 yr (0.1-16.2) post-Htx at 15.2 yr of age (4.4-24.4), with follow-up 0.5-4.6 yr. SRL was well tolerated with no increase in hyperlipidemia, rejection or mortality. None required SRL discontinuation. SRL was well tolerated in pediatric Htx patients. Kidney function remained stable; subjects had no increase in mortality, rejection or PTLD. Multicenter studies using renal sparing protocols are needed to determine whether SRL should be used routinely in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Matthews
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Hospital and Siragusa Transplant Center, Chicago, IL 60614, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Impact of different long-term maintenance immunosuppressive therapy strategies on patients' outcome after heart transplantation. Transpl Immunol 2010; 23:93-103. [PMID: 20434559 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2010.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2009] [Revised: 04/13/2010] [Accepted: 04/21/2010] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of cyclosporine in the early 1980s meant a decisive improvement in post-transplant outcomes for all solid-organ transplants and, in particular, it allowed heart transplantation to emerge as a viable therapeutic option for patients with end-stage cardiac failure. Many factors, including recipient and donor selection, organ preservation and the technical aspects of the transplant itself, influence post-operative outcomes following heart transplantation but the continued need to treat the recipient's immune response plays a key role in determining long-term outcomes. Thereby interactions between immunosuppressive drugs used in different combinations play an important role in patients' outcome. After more than two decades, significant controversy still exists as to the best immunosuppressive regimen for long-term maintenance. During the 1990s and 2000s, newer immunosuppressive medications, specifically, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, everolimus and the IL-2 receptor blockers (daclizumab and basiliximab), were introduced that allow the clinician several options to try to minimize side effects and maximize the desired therapeutic effects. The side effects involve direct organ toxicity (e.g. renal and hepatic dysfunction), metabolic disturbances, (e.g. diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension), neurotoxicity, and several other significant adverse events, such as cholestasis and myelosuppression. Newer immunosuppressive drugs can impair wound healing, induce lung toxicity and produce various cytopenic states. Steroids continue to plague patients with their well-known side effects. This article reviews the current data on the benefits and risks of the various therapeutic regimens available, which are analyzed under three main themes: calcineurin inhibitor based therapies, calcineurin minimization protocols and calcineurin free regimens.
Collapse
|
15
|
|