Proton pump inhibitors reduce mycophenolate exposure in heart transplant recipients-a prospective case-controlled study

Comparing safety of proton-pump inhibitors versus H2-receptor antagonists in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Multiple studies have been conducted to compare the safety of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) as acid-suppressive treatment in kidney transplant recipients with conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse effects in kidney transplant patients receiving PPIs compared to those treated with H2RAs.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on the databases from inception to June 2021. The treatment effects were expressed as odds ratio (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled by a random-effects model.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Eight studies, consisting 4,844 patients, were included. Patients were followed for a mean duration of 23.57 months after transplantation. Compared with H2RAs, PPIs exposure was associated with similar rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.83-1.34, p = 0.67), mortality (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.56-3.07, p = 0.533), graft loss (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.59-1.93, p = 0.842), Clostridioides difficile infection (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 0.49-3.85, p = 0.545) and pneumonia (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 0.95-3.52, p = 0.072). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months was lower in patients who received PPIs than those treated with H2RAs (WMD = -1.01, 95% CI -1.89 to -0.12 ml/min/1.73m² , p = 0.02). The PPI-treated kidney transplant patients experienced higher rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.03-3.04, p = 0.039) and hypomagnesemia (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.46-3.20, p ˂ 0.001).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Compared with H2RAs, PPIs were not associated with higher risks of BPAR, mortality, graft loss or infection-related outcomes. However, taking PPIs was associated with higher rates of AMR and hypomagnesemia, and lower eGFR at one year after transplantation. Further well-controlled studies are needed to assess the impact of acid-suppressive strategy on long-term outcomes in KTRs.

Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Heart Transplant Recipients by Population Pharmacokinetic and Limited Sampling Strategies

Purpose: The aim of this study is i) to establish a strategy to estimate the area under the curve of the dosing interval (AUC0-12h) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the heart transplant recipients and ii) to find the covariates that significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of MPA exposure. Methods: This single-center, prospective, open-label, observational study was conducted in 91 adult heart transplant recipients orally taking mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets. Samples collected intensively and sparsely were analyzed by the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique, and all the data were used in PPK modeling. Potential covariates were tested stepwise. The goodness-of-fit plots, the normalized prediction distribution error, and prediction-corrected visual predictive check were used for model evaluation. Optimal sampling times by ED-optimal strategy and multilinear regression (MLR) were analyzed based on the simulated data by the final PPK model. Moreover, using intensive data from 14 patients, the accuracy of AUC0-12h estimation was evaluated by Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Alman plots for both the PPK model and MLR equation. Results: A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with a lag time was chosen as the structure model. Co-medication of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and albumin (ALB) were found to significantly affect bioavailability (F), clearance of central compartment (CL/F), and the distribution volume of the central compartment (V2/F), respectively. Co-medication of PPIs decreased F by 27.6%. When eGFR decreased by 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, CL/F decreased by 23.7%. However, the impact of ALB on V2/F was limited to MPA exposure. The final model showed an adequate fitness of the data. The optimal sampling design was pre-dose and 1 and 4 h post-dose for pharmacokinetic estimation. The best-fit linear equation was finally established as follows: AUC0-12h = 3.539 × C0 + 0.288 × C0.5 + 1.349 × C1 + 6.773 × C4.5. Conclusion: A PPK model was established with three covariates in heart transplant patients. Co-medication of PPIs and eGFR had a remarkable impact on AUC0-12h of MPA. A linear equation was also concluded with four time points as an alternative way to estimate AUC0-12h for MPA.

Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

ABSTRACT

When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid after haplo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japanese recipients

PURPOSE

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a mycophenolic acid (MPA) prodrug, is used to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Although previous studies have reported that enterohepatic circulation (EHC) of MPA, which is usually observed in MMF-treated patients, does not occur in HSCT patients, it is unclear what happens in haploidentical-HSCT (haplo-HSCT) patients, who are using post-transplant cyclophosphamide. This study was conducted to investigate MPA pharmacokinetics in haplo-HSCT patients.

METHODS

Seventeen haplo-HSCT patients, who received MMF for GVHD prophylaxis, were enrolled in this study. We collected blood samples on days 14 and 28, and plasma MPA concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography; pharmacokinetic parameters such as area under the curve (AUC), mean residence time (MRT), and apparent oral clearance (CL/F) were measured with moment analysis. We also evaluated EHC as AUC_6-12h/AUC_0-12h.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in MPA pharmacokinetic parameters between days 14 and 28. There was also no difference between the pharmacokinetic parameter changes and diarrhea. Additionally, varying plasma MPA concentrations suggested that MPA EHC did not occur.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we revealed the pharmacokinetics of MMF in Japanese haplo-HSCT recipients. Additionally, our study demonstrated that MPA EHC might not occur in Japanese haplo-HSCT recipients.

Effect of the proton-pump Inhibitor pantoprazole on MycoPhenolic ACid exposure in kidney and liver transplant recipienTs (IMPACT study): a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely utilized as an immunosuppressant in kidney and liver transplantation, with reports suggesting an independent relationship between MPA concentrations and adverse allograft outcome. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) may have variable effects on the absorption of different MPA formulations leading to differences in MPA exposure.

METHODS

A multicentre, randomized, prospective, double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study was conducted to determine the effect of the PPI pantoprazole on the MPA and its metabolite MPA-glucuronide (MPA-G) area under the curve (AUC) >12 h (MPA-AUC12 h) in recipients maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). We planned a priori to examine separately recipients maintained on MMF and EC-MPS for each pharmacokinetic parameter. The trial (and protocol) was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on 24 March 2011, with the registration number of ACTRN12611000316909 ('IMPACT' study).

RESULTS

Of the 45 recipients screened, 40 (19 MMF and 21 EC-MPS) were randomized. The mean (standard deviation) recipient age was 58 (11) years with a median (interquartile range) time post-transplant of 43 (20-132) months. For recipients on MMF, there was a significant reduction in the MPA-AUC12 h [geometric mean (95% confidence interval) placebo: 53.9 (44.0-65.9) mg*h/L versus pantoprazole: 43.8 (35.6-53.4) mg*h/L; P = 0.004] when pantoprazole was co-administered compared with placebo. In contrast, co-administration with pantoprazole significantly increased MPA-AUC12 h [placebo: 36.1 (26.5-49.2) mg*h/L versus pantoprazole: 45.9 (35.5-59.3) mg*h/L; P = 0.023] in those receiving EC-MPS. Pantoprazole had no effect on the pharmacokinetic profiles of MPA-G for either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-administration of pantoprazole substantially reduced the bioavailability of MPA in patients maintained on MMF and had the opposite effect in patients maintained on EC-MPS, and therefore, clinicians should be cognizant of this drug interaction when prescribing the different MPA formulations.

Different Routes of Proton Pumps Inhibitors Co-Administration have Significant Impact on Mycophenolate Acid (MPA) Serum Levels in Heart Transplant Recipients

Background

Antiproliferative drugs including mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are widely accepted part of an immunosuppressive therapy following heart transplantation. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are routinely administered after cardiac surgery procedures including transplantation. They may also have impact on mycophenolate acid (MPA) serum levels.

Material/Methods

There were 30 consecutive patients (28 male and 2 female patients) with a mean age of 45±12 years who were enrolled into this study. MPA serum levels were studied; PPIs were intravenously and orally administered.

Results

The mean MPA plasma concentrations were statistically significantly different between parenteral group (2.3±1.4 umg/mL) and oral group (3.1±2.2 umg/mL) (P=0.036) before immunosuppressive drug administration (C-0 time). There was a statistically significant different drug concentration at the second sample time C-30 (30 minutes after drug intake) reaching 4.4±2.8 umg/mL versus 7.9±4.5 umg/mL (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in MPA plasma concentration at the 3^rd measurement C-120 (10.7±4,9 umg/mL versus 9.8±5 umg/mL) (P=0.3). There is a statistically significant different MMF serum concentration after oral intake and intravenous infusion at C-30 (2.4±1.4 in group 1 versus 3.3±2.5 in group 2, P<0.036) but not at C-120 time interval (8.9±5.0 versus 9.8±5.3 in group 1 and 2, respectively) (P=0.3).

Conclusions

Our study was the first study that compared different routes of PPI co-administration on MPA serum levels in a transplant recipient group. Our study revealed that the parenteral route of administration only slowed not decreased MPA pharmacokinetics within 120 minutes following MMF administration.

The Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Renal Function in Kidney Transplanted Patients

Recently, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake has been linked to acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of PPIs on renal function and rejection rate in kidney transplant patients. We performed a single center, retrospective analysis of 455 patients who received a kidney transplant between May 2010 and July 2015. Median follow-up time was 3.3 years. PPI prescription was assessed in half-year intervals. Primary outcome parameters were the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), change in the eGFR, and >30% and >50% eGFR decline for different time periods (up to four years post-transplantation). Our secondary outcome parameter was occurrence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) in the first two years after transplantation. Except for >30% eGFR decline from half a year to two years post-transplantation (p = 0.044) and change in the eGFR, >30% and >50% eGFR decline showed no association with PPI intake in our patient cohort (p > 0.05). Similarly, by analyzing 158 rejection episodes, BPAR showed no correspondence with mean daily PPI intake. We conclude that prolonged PPI intake has no relevant adverse effect on kidney transplant function or rejection rates. Polypharmacy, however, remains a problem in renal transplant recipients and it is thus advisable to question the necessity of PPI prescriptions when clear indications are missing.

Early pharmacokinetics of low dosage mycophenolate exposure in Thai kidney transplant recipients

Background The effects of mycophenolic acid exposure in the early period after transplantation on clinical outcomes have been reported; however, mycophenolic acid exposure in the early period after transplantation in Asian kidney transplant recipients who receive 1.5 g/d mycophenolate mofetil has never been investigated. Objective To determine mycophenolic acid exposure on day 3 post-transplantation in kidney transplant recipiens who receive 1.5 g/d mycophenolate mofetil. The effects of the reduced renal function on mycophenolic acid area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the achievement of the target AUC on the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection during the first month post-transplantation were also evaluated. Setting A university hospital Method Blood samples and 24-h urine were collected on day 3 post-transplantation. Main outcome measures The mycophenolic acid AUC was calculated by linear trapezoidal rule and compared with the target of 45 mg*h/L. Results Of 42 Thai kidney transplant recipiens, the mean mycophenolic acid AUC of 45.1 mg*h/L (SD 14.7) was comparable to the AUC target (P = 0.962). Significant differences of the mycophenolic acid AUC were observed between patients with urine output of < 2400 mL and those with urine output ≥ 2400 mL (35.3 ± 6.6 and 47.4 ± 15.2, respectively; P = 0.002), and between patients with 24-h measured CrCl < 25 mL/min and those with CrCl ≥ 25 mL/min (38.0 (29.0, 42.2) and 49.2 ± 14.0, respectively; P = 0.017). Proportions of overall biopsy proven acute rejection among patients with mycophenolic acid AUC of < 45 and ≥ 45 mg*h/L were comparable (20.0% and 23.5%, respectively; P = 1.000). Conclusions After the starting dosage of 1.5 g/d mycophenolate mofetil, the mean mycophenolic acid AUC on day 3 post-kidney transplantation is comparable with the target of 45 mg*h/L. Severely reduced renal function significantly influences mycophenolic acid exposure.

Immunosuppressive drugs and the gastrointestinal tract in renal transplant patients

Gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort is common after renal transplantation and can be caused by the use of various immunosuppressive drugs. GI symptoms affect the quality of life, lead to an impaired graft survival and an increased mortality. Moreover, diseases and disturbances of the GI tract also affect the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs. This review addresses the interaction between immunosuppressive agents and GI disorders. The GI tract is involved in the metabolism of several immunosuppressive drugs. Calcineurin inhibitors, mTor inhibitors, and corticosteroids are subjected to metabolism by the intestinal cytochrome P450 (CYP3A) and by the drug efflux pump ABCB1. Mycophenolate is partly metabolized in the stomach and intestine and undergoes enterohepatic recirculation. Gastrointestinal disturbances can lead to a modified exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. In the first and second part of this review, we focus on the role of the GI tract in the pharmacokinetics of the immunosuppressive drugs and how to adjust immunosuppressive therapy in patients with vomiting, need for tube feeding, delayed gastric emptying, intestinal resection, and diarrhea. In the third part, we review the GI adverse effects of the various immunosuppressive drugs, with special attention for diarrhea and dyspepsia. Finally, we discuss the effects of drugs used for relief of GI complaints on the exposure to immunosuppressive agents.

Impact of Pre-existing Comorbidities on Long-term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease are mainly affected by their comorbidities. Detailed data evaluating the impact of pre-transplant comorbidities on long-term outcome after kidney transplantation are largely missing.

METHODS

In a long-term retrospective analysis, we investigated 839 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who received transplants between 1999 and 2014. The prevalence and impact of the most relevant comorbidities were studied in detail.

RESULTS

At the time of transplantation, 25% of KTRs had coronary artery disease (CAD), 16% had diabetes mellitus (DM), 11% had peripheral arterial disease (PAD), 8% had chronic heart failure (CHF), and 7% had cerebrovascular disease (CVD). KTRs with pre-existing CAD, DM, PAD, and CHF showed a significantly inferior patient survival. Multivariate analysis adjusting for all relevant factors and comorbidities confirmed CAD as most hazardous independent risk factor for premature death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.70; P = .002). A multivariate analysis revealed CHF and PAD as independent risk factors for death censored graft loss (HR 2.20; P = .003 and HR 1.80; P = .013). Diabetes was independently and significantly associated with T-cell- (HR 1.46; P = .020) and antibody-mediated rejections (HR 2.27; P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

Detailed quantification of the impact of pre-transplant comorbidities may facilitate the evaluation of transplant candidates, guide post-transplant follow-up, and may help to further refine prediction algorithms and allocation systems.

Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase Pharmacogenetics in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients

We evaluated inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) 1 and IMPDH2 pharmacogenetics in 247 recipient-donor pairs after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Patients were conditioned with total body irradiation + fludarabine and received grafts from related or unrelated donors (10% HLA mismatch), with postgraft immunosuppression of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with a calcineurin inhibitor. Recipient and donor IMPDH genotypes (rs11706052, rs2278294, rs2278293) were not associated with day 28 T cell chimerism, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), disease relapse, cytomegalovirus reactivation, nonrelapse mortality, or overall survival. Recipient IMPDH1 rs2278293 genotype was associated with a lower incidence of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio, .72; P = .008) in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results with the goal of identifying predictive biomarkers to MMF that lower GVHD.

Renal Transplant Acute Rejection with Lower Mycophenolate Mofetil Dosing and Proton Pump Inhibitors or Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic data show reduced mycophenolic acid levels in renal transplant recipients taking mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) concomitantly. This reduced exposure could increase rejection risk. The typical initial MMF dose post renal transplantation is 2 g/day, which often requires dose reduction secondary to side effects. Existing studies have not shown significant acute rejection differences for patients taking MMF-PPI versus patients taking MMF-ranitidine.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes in renal transplant recipients receiving a lower MMF dose than previously studied (1.5 g/day) and either a PPI or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adult subjects receiving a renal transplant between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2013. Comparison groups were defined based on acid-suppressing therapy class prescribed at discharge from transplantation. The primary outcome was acute rejection incidence within 1 year posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Of 728 renal transplant recipients screened, 522 were included: 183 taking a PPI and 339 taking an H2RA. There was no significant difference in acute rejection within 1 year (H2RA 19% versus PPI 14%, p=0.12) or 3 months (4% vs 5%, p=0.44, respectively) posttransplantation. Maintenance immunosuppression (MMF dose and tacrolimus troughs) was similar between groups at 3 months and 1 year. Graft and patient survivals were favorable (> 95%), and graft function at 1 year was stable and similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite taking lower MMF doses than previously studied, subjects on a PPI compared to an H2RA were not at increased risk of acute rejection within 1 year posttransplantation.

Influence of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Mycophenolic Acid Pharmacokinetics in Patients With Renal Transplantation and the Relationship With Cytochrome 2C19 Gene Polymorphism

BACKGROUND

Most patients have serious digestive complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, it is important to protect gastrointestinal function to improve the survival rate of transplant patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) such as lansoprazole and rabeprazole are widely administered to renal transplant patients with mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the perioperative period. PPIs are metabolized by cytochrome (CYP) 2C19 enzymes. Mycophenolate sodium (MYF) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been used in immunosuppression. Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions have been described between immunosuppressive drugs. In the present study, we investigated the drug interaction between MPA and lansoparazole or rabeprazole and the impact of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on these drug interactions after renal transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 125 renal transplant patients taking MPA derivatives between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. The 125 patients were divided into 6 groups: MMF/tacrolimus/steroid together with lansoprazole or rabeprazole; MYF/tacrolimus/steroid together with lansoprazole or rabeprazole and without PPI. The single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP2C19 were determined by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. Plasma concentrations of MPA were measured by cloned enzyme donor immunoassay. Clinical parameters such as incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection, the rate of change of serum creatinine, toxicity, and gastrointestinal adverse effects were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean concentrations of MPA in the MYF group were higher than those in the MMF group. The mean dose-adjusted blood concentration of MPA coadministered with lansoprazole was lower than that of MPA with rabeprazole or without PPI in MMF and MYF groups (P < .05). In patients with the CYP2C19*2/*2 genotype, the mean concentrations of MMF with lansoprazole were significantly lower than those with rabeprazole with MMF or without PPI (P < .05). Gastrointestinal side effects were significantly higher in MMF with lansoprazole group than in MYF with lansoprazole group (P < .05). However, no differences were found according to genotype distribution in all groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Polymorphisms in CYP2C19 are related to the metabolic oxidation of drugs to varying degrees. Both genetic and clinical factors in pharmacokinetics may help to make further progress toward individualized therapy to yield maximum efficacy with minimal side effects.

The Safety of Appropriate Use of Over-the-Counter Proton Pump Inhibitors: An Evidence-Based Review and Delphi Consensus

The availability of over-the-counter (OTC) proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the short-term (2 weeks) management of frequent heartburn (≥2 days/week) has increased markedly, yet evidence-based recommendations have not been developed. A panel of nine international experts in gastroesophageal reflux disease developed consensus statements regarding the risks and benefits of OTC PPIs using a modified Delphi process. Consensus (based on ≥80% approval) was reached through multiple rounds of remote voting and a final round of live voting. To identify relevant data, the available literature was searched and summarized. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system terminology was used to rate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations; consensus was based on ≥2/3 agreement. After 4 rounds of review, consensus was achieved for 18 statements. Notably, the available data did not directly reflect OTC use, but instead, prescription use; therefore, extrapolations to the OTC setting were often necessary. This limitation is regrettable, but it justifies performing this exercise to provide evidence-based expert opinion on a widely used class of drugs. The panel determined that using OTC PPIs according to label instructions is unlikely to mask the symptoms of esophageal or gastric cancer or adversely impact the natural history of related precursor conditions. OTC PPIs are not expected to substantially affect micronutrient absorption or bone mineral density or cause community-acquired pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection, or cardiovascular adverse events. However, OTC PPI use may be associated with slightly increased risks for infectious diarrhea, certain idiosyncratic reactions, and cirrhosis-related spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The available evidence does not suggest that OTC PPI use consistent with label instructions is associated with substantial health risks. To minimize potential risks, healthcare professionals and consumers must actively participate in decision making when managing reflux-related symptoms in the self-care setting.

A Comparison of Histamine Receptor Antagonists Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor Gastrointestinal Ulcer Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

There are several different agents that can be used for gastrointestinal (GI) ulcer prophylaxis in posttransplant recipients, such as histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study was conducted to compare the incidence of adverse kidney events in transplant recipients who received prophylaxis with H2RAs or PPIs.

DESIGN

This retrospective study included all kidney transplant recipients from 3 transplant centers who were transplanted in 2009 through 2011. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of adverse events posttransplant, defined as the incidence of pneumonia, Clostridium difficile, hip fractures, GI bleeding, cytomegalovirus, organ rejection, and bacteremia.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients were included in the study; of which 35 were included in the PPI group and 176 were included in the H2RA group. There were no significant differences between groups in regard to incidence of GI bleeding events or other adverse events.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest there is a low incidence of GI ulcers and upper GI bleeding events after kidney transplantation with the use of H2RAs or PPIs. Additionally, there are similar rates of adverse events when comparing H2RAs versus PPIs for GI ulcer prophylaxis.

Routine prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors and post-transplant complications in kidney transplant recipients undergoing early corticosteroid withdrawal

Surgical stress, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate may contribute to gastrointestinal ulcers/bleeding after kidney transplantation. Prophylactic acid suppression with H2RAs or PPIs is often utilized after transplantation, although unclear if truly indicated after early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD). PPIs have been associated with increased risks of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), pneumonia, and acute rejection. This retrospective cohort study investigated benefits and risks of prolonged PPI use following kidney transplantation and included 286 kidney recipients undergoing CSWD within five d of transplant who were maintained on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil/sodium. Patients on PPI before transplant, H2RA before/after transplant, and/or those with pre-transplant GI complications were excluded. A total of 171 patients received PPI>30 d, mean duration 287 ± 120 d (PPI group); 115 patients were not maintained on acid suppression (No-PPI group). GI ulceration and bleeding events were rare in PPI group (1.2% and 2.3%, respectively) and not observed in No-PPI group (p = NS). The incidence of infectious or hematological complications was not significantly different between groups. The PPI group experienced more biopsy-proven acute rejection (9.4% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.03). No direct benefit was observed with PPI in reducing the incidence of GI ulcers and bleeding events in kidney transplant recipients undergoing early CSWD. Further studies are needed to investigate the association of PPI and acute rejection.

High interpatient variability in response to mycophenolic acid maintenance therapy in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is used in the maintenance therapy of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated systemic vasculitis (AASV). MPA exerts its immunosuppression by inhibiting inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), depleting activated lymphocytes of guanine nucleotides and retarding their proliferation. The purpose of our study was to examine the correlation between clinical outcome and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships of MPA in patients with AASV.

METHODS

We studied 358 Caucasian control patients without any MPA therapy to examine basal IMPDH activity. Thirty Caucasian patients with AASV under maintenance therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) underwent therapeutic drug monitoring.

RESULTS

We observed a high interindividual variability with regard to basal IMPDH activity in patients without any MPA treatment (0.8-35 nmol/mg protein/h). Patients were followed for a mean (±SD) period of 22 ± 8 months. During the observation period, seven patients had a relapse with an elevated Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score of 9.2 ± 6. The basal IMPDH activity (Abasal) in patients who subsequently relapsed was raised at baseline, before receiving their first dose of MMF, and further increased at the time of relapse, when compared with stable patients. Patients with a relapse during the maintenance therapy had significantly higher levels of IMPDH activity [IMPDH enzyme activity curve (AEC) (0-12)] than stable patients (P = 0.001), indicating inadequate IMPDH suppression. MPA-AUC (0-12) was significantly decreased in relapse patients, in contrast to stable patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the highly variable response to maintenance therapy with MPA, PD drug monitoring is a new tool for detecting inadequate immunosuppression in AASV patients.

No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study

AIMS

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) suppresses lymphocyte proliferation through inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) inhibition. Two formulations have been approved: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Pantoprazole (PAN) inhibits gastric acid secretion, which may alter MPA exposure. Data from healthy volunteers suggest a significant drug-drug interaction (DDA) between pantoprazole and MPA. In transplant patients, a decreased MPA area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) may lead to higher IMPDH activity, which may lead to higher acute rejection risk. Therefore this DDA was evaluated in renal transplant patients under maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

In this single-centre, open, randomized, four-sequence, four-treatment crossover study, the influence of PAN 40 mg on MPA pharmacokinetics such as (dose-adjusted) AUC0-12 h (dAUC) was analysed in 20 renal transplant patients (>6 months post-transplantation) receiving MMF (1-2 g day(-1) ) and EC-MPS in combination with ciclosporin. The major metabolite MPA glucuronide (MPAG) and the IMPDH activity were also examined.

RESULTS

MMF + PAN intake led to a lowest mean dAUC for MPA of 41.46 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.38, 50.54], while MPA exposure was highest for EC-MPS + PAN [dAUC: 46.30 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 37.11, 55.49)]. Differences in dAUC and dose-adjusted maximum concentration (dCmax) were not significant. Only for MMF [dAUC: 41.46 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 32.38, 50.54)] and EC-MPS [dAUC: 43.39 ng h ml(-1) mg(-1) (95% CI 33.44, 53.34)] bioequivalence was established for dAUC [geometric mean ratio: 101.25% (90% CI 84.60, 121.17)]. Simultaneous EC-MPS + PAN intake led to an earlier time to Cmax (tmax) [median: 2.0 h (min-max: 0.5-10.0)] than EC-MPS intake alone [3 h (1.5-12.0); P = 0.037]. Tmax was not affected for MMF [1.0 h (0.5-5.0)] ± pantoprazole [1.0 h (0.5-6.0), P = 0.928). No impact on MPAG pharmacokinetics or IMPDH activity was found.

CONCLUSION

Pantoprazole influences EC-MPS and MMF pharmacokinetics but as it had no impact on MPA pharmacodynamics, the immunosuppressive effect of the drug was not impaired.

Concomitant proton pump inhibitors with mycophenolate mofetil and the risk of rejection in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Recent pharmacokinetic studies have demonstrated that proton pump inhibitors (PPI) reduce exposure of mycophenolic acid. However, the clinical significance of this drug-drug interaction on transplantation outcomes has not been determined.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in kidney transplant recipients who were prescribed rabbit antithymocyte globulin, calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. We evaluated the impact of PPI use on the 1-year rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirteen patients who were prescribed PPI were compared with 384 patients who were on standard acid-suppressive therapy with ranitidine. BPAR occurred in similar rates in both groups (15% vs. 12%; P=0.31). In a multivariable analysis, black race was associated with a higher risk of rejection (risk ratio [RR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-4.03). While controlling for rejection risk factors, PPI exposure was associated with an increased risk of rejection in black patients (RR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.18-3.16) but not in non-black patients (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.19-1.49). At 1 year, BPAR type, BPAR grade, patient and graft survival, graft function, and time to BPAR were not associated with PPI exposure.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, PPI use in the first transplant year was associated with an increased risk for BPAR in black patients but not in non-black patients. It is possible that a reduction in mycophenolic acid exposure contributed to the increased risk.

Pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in organ transplant recipients: an update

This review aims to provide an update of the literature on the pharmacology and toxicology of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients. Mycophenolate is now the antimetabolite of choice in immunosuppressant regimens in transplant recipients. The active drug moiety mycophenolic acid (MPA) is available as an ester pro-drug and an enteric-coated sodium salt. MPA is a competitive, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine-5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), an important rate-limiting enzyme in purine synthesis. MPA suppresses T and B lymphocyte proliferation; it also decreases expression of glycoproteins and adhesion molecules responsible for recruiting monocytes and lymphocytes to sites of inflammation and graft rejection; and may destroy activated lymphocytes by induction of a necrotic signal. Improved long-term allograft survival has been demonstrated for MPA and may be due to inhibition of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 or fibroblast proliferation. Recent research also suggested a differential effect of mycophenolate on the regulatory T cell/helper T cell balance which could potentially encourage immune tolerance. Lower exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (renal sparing) appears to be possible with concomitant use of MPA in renal transplant recipients without undue risk of rejection. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. At least three studies have now reported that MPA exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with bioavailability decreasing significantly with increasing doses, perhaps due to saturable absorption processes or saturable enterohepatic recirculation. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is still controversial and the ability of routine MPA TDM to improve long-term graft survival and patient outcomes is largely unknown. MPA monitoring may be more important in high-immunological recipients, those on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimens and in whom unexpected rejection or infections have occurred. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA has been obtained in patients receiving MMF therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA area under the concentration time from 0 to 12 h post-dose (AUC0-12) is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection although AUC0-12 optimal cut-off values vary across study populations. IMPDH monitoring to identify individuals at increased risk of rejection shows some promise but is still in the experimental stage. A relationship between MPA exposure and adverse events was identified in some but not all studies. Genetic variants within genes involved in MPA metabolism (UGT1A9, UGT1A8, UGT2B7), cellular transportation (SLCOB1, SLCO1B3, ABCC2) and targets (IMPDH) have been reported to effect MPA pharmacokinetics and/or response in some studies; however, larger studies across different ethnic groups that take into account genetic linkage and drug interactions that can alter a patient's phenotype are needed before any clinical recommendations based on patient genotype can be formulated. There is little data on the pharmacology and toxicology of MPA in older and paediatric transplant recipients.

High prevalence of potential drug interactions affecting mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics in nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Objective: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure is associated with clinical outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. Various drug interaction studies, predominantly in healthy volunteers or solid organ transplant recipients, have identified medications which impact MPA pharmacokinetics. Recipients of nonmyeloablative HCT, however, have an increased burden of comorbidities, potentially increasing the number of concomitant medications and potential drug interactions (PDI) affecting MPA exposure. Thus, we sought to be the first to characterize these PDI in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients. Materials and methods: We compiled PDI affecting MPA pharmacokinetics and characterized the prevalence of PDI in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients. A comprehensive literature evaluation of four databases and PubMed was conducted to identify medications with PDI affecting MPA pharmacokinetics. Subsequently, a retrospective medication review was conducted to characterize the cumulative PDI burden, defined as the number of PDI for an individual patient over the first 21 days after allogeneic graft infusion, in 84 nonmyeloablative HCT recipients. Results: Of the 187 concomitant medications, 11 (5.9%) had a PDI affecting MPA pharmacokinetics. 87% of 84 patients had one PDI, with a median cumulative PDI burden of 2 (range 0 – 4). The most common PDI, in descending order, were cyclosporine, omeprazole and pantoprazole. Conclusion: Only a minority of medications (5.9%) have a PDI affecting MPA pharmacokinetics. However, the majority of nonmyeloablative HCT recipients had a PDI, with cyclosporine and the proton pump inhibitors being the most common. A better understanding of PDI and their management should lead to safer medication regimens for nonmyeloablative HCT recipients.

Evaluation of potential interactions between mycophenolic acid derivatives and proton pump inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, impact of the complications on transplant outcomes, and the potential interactions between mycophenolic acid (MPA) derivatives and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

DATA SOURCES

An unrestricted literature search (1980-January 2012) was performed with MEDLINE and EMBASE using the following key words: drug-drug interaction, enteric-coated mycophenolic acid, GI complications, mycophenolate mofetil, solid organ transplant, and proton pump inhibitor, including individual agents within the class. Abstracts from scientific meetings were also evaluated. Additionally, reference citations from identified publications were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant English-language, original research articles and review articles were evaluated if they focused on any of the topics identified in the search or included substantial content addressing GI complications in SOT recipients or drug interactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

GI complications are frequent among SOT recipients, with some studies showing prevalence rates as high as 70%. Transplant outcomes among renal transplant recipients are significantly impacted by GI complications, especially in patients requiring immunosuppressant dosage reductions or premature discontinuation. To this end, PPI use among patients receiving transplants is common. Recent data demonstrate that PPIs significantly reduce the overall exposure to MPA after oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil. Similar studies show this interaction does not exist between PPIs and enteric-coated mycophenolic acid (EC-MPA). Unfortunately, most of the available data evaluating this interaction are pharmacokinetic analyses that do not investigate the clinical impact of this interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant interaction exists between PPIs and mycophenolate mofetil secondary to reduced dissolution of mycophenolate mofetil in higher pH environments. EC-MPA is not absorbed in the stomach; therefore, low intragastric acidity does not impact EC-MPA and bioavailability is maintained with this formulation during PPI coadministration. The clinical impact of this interaction is unknown, yet one can theorize that reduced exposure to MPA in SOT recipients can increase the risk of allograft rejection and/or failure.

Omeprazole impairs the absorption of mycophenolate mofetil but not of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in healthy volunteers

In 2 crossover studies, 12 healthy volunteers (6 male/6 female) received a single oral dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1000 mg or an equimolar dose of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) 720 mg fasting with and without coadministered omeprazole 20 mg bid. The plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and of the inactive metabolite mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPA-G) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In addition, dissolution of MMF 500 mg or EC-MPS 360 mg tablets was determined using an USP paddle apparatus in aqueous buffer of pH 1 to 7. The bioavailability of MPA following administration of MMF or EC-MPS was similar except for the time to peak concentration, which was longer in the EC-MPS group. Concomitant treatment with omeprazole lowered significantly C(max) and AUC(12h) of MPA following administration of MMF. The pharmacokinetics of EC-MPS was not affected. Dissolution of MMF in aqueous buffer decreased dramatically at pH above 4.5. The EC-MPS tablet was stable up to pH 5. Above, EC-MPS was quantitatively disintegrated and MPS quantitatively dissolved. There is strong evidence that impaired absorption of MMF with concomitant proton pump inhibitors is due to incomplete dissolution of MMF in the stomach at elevated pH.

The role of proton pump inhibitors on early mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplantation: evidence from the CLEAR study

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed posttransplantation to prevent gastrointestinal complications. A series of recent studies have reported a relationship between PPI comedication and decreased mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure. The objective of this subanalysis of the CLEAR data set was to determine the impact of PPI therapy on full MPA area under the curve exposures at Day 5 post kidney transplant.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either intensified dosing of mycophenolate mofetil (1.5 g twice daily on Days 1-5, then 1.0 g twice daily, n = 68) or standard dosing (1.0 g twice daily, n = 67). All recipients received tacrolimus and prednisone.

RESULTS

In the modified intention-to-treat population, 57.9% of patients (73 of 126) received PPI therapy. The most frequently administered therapies were pantoprazole and omeprazole. There was no significant difference in mean MPA area under the curve at Day 5 for patients receiving PPI therapy as compared with those not receiving PPI therapy (51.3 versus 55.8 mg.h/L, P = 0.265). However, the MPA concentration-time curve analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in MPA concentrations at 2 hours and 12 hours postdose in patients receiving PPI therapy (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.034). No significant differences were identified in the 3-g arm specifically. In the multivariate model, only serum creatinine and albumin significantly predicted MPA area under the curve less than 30 mg.h/L at Day 5.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

PPI therapy in combination with mycophenolate mofetil does not appear to have a significant impact on full MPA exposure. Because MPA pharmacokinetics were not significantly impacted when a 3-g, 5-day loading dose of mycophenolate mofetil was used in combination with PPI therapy, this strategy may be required for adequate MPA exposure whether or not a patient receives PPI comedication.

The importance of assessing medication exposure to the definition of refractory disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Treatment of patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) who have active disease refractory to current therapeutic strategies continues to be a real challenge. Here, we propose that the classic definition of refractory SLE patients - failure to achieve adequate response to the standard of care - should be further refined to incorporate the dimension of adequate drug exposure. Inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability may induce insufficient exposure to many drugs used in SLE, leading to both apparent inefficacy of treatments and inappropriate therapeutic escalation. Among others, we have shown that individual assessment of exposure to mycophenolic acid, the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could be used to determine whether a given patient received adequate doses of MMF. We have also shown that measuring blood concentrations of hydroxychloroquine could be used as an efficient way to assess observance, which is a critical issue since a significant proportion of refractory SLE patients is likely to have poor observance as the primary source of treatment failure. Finally, we have underlined the importance of assessing drug interactions as SLE patients often require, in addition to immunosuppressants, several other drugs to prevent or treat associated conditions, which may result in decreased exposure to immunosuppressants. Considering these data, we believe that refractory SLE patients should not only be defined as the failure to achieve adequate therapeutic response to the standard of care, but should also incorporate the dimension of inadequate pharmacokinetic exposure and include drug blood level, interaction and observance monitoring.

Mycophenolate monitoring in liver, thoracic, pancreas, and small bowel transplantation: a consensus report

Assessing the value of mycophenolic acid (MPA) monitoring outside renal transplantation is hindered by the absence of any trial comparing fixed-dose and concentration-controlled therapy. However, in liver and thoracic transplantation particularly, clinical trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and case series have described MPA efficacy, exposure/efficacy relationships, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinical outcomes relating to plasma MPA concentrations. On the basis of this evidence, this report identifies MPA as an immunosuppressant for which the combination of variable disposition, efficacy, and adverse effects contributes to interindividual differences seemingly in excess of those optimal for a fixed-dosage mycophenolate regimen. Combined with experiences of MPA monitoring in other transplant indications, the data have been rationalized to define circumstances in which measurement of MPA concentrations can contribute to improved management of mycophenolate therapy in nonrenal transplant recipients.

Proton pump inhibitors interfere with the immunosuppressive potency of mycophenolate mofetil

OBJECTIVES

MMF is cleaved in the acidic milieu of the gastric compartment. However, its absorption might be impeded by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which suppress acid production and thus increase stomach pH. Since PPIs are widely used, it is useful to clarify whether the total drug amount of MMF is available in patients undergoing PPI treatment.

METHODS

We analysed 36 patients with autoimmune diseases under stable MMF maintenance therapy. Twenty-three patients received co-medication with pantoprazole; 13 patients received no treatment with PPIs or antacids. To assess the immunosuppressive potency, we measured mycophenolic acid levels and inosin monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity with a validated HPLC method in plasma samples collected pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after oral administration.

RESULTS

The mean MMF dosage of the non-PPI patients was 770 (249) mg/12 h and 771 (291) mg/12 h in pantoprazole-treated patients (NS). The total area under the curve of MMF showed a 37% reduction in PPI patients vs those treated with no PPIs (P < 0.01), and the maximum peak concentration of MMF was 60% lower in the pantoprazole patients (P < 0.001). The MMF exposure correlated with the inhibition of IMPDH activity. The area of enzyme activity curve was 42% higher in the PPI patients (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The co-medication of pantoprazole with MMF significantly influences the drug exposure and immunosuppressive potency of MMF in patients with autoimmune diseases. This finding might at least partly explain the different outcomes in studies using MMF for maintenance therapy.