Pharmacokinetics for once- versus twice-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo kidney transplantation: a randomized, open-label trial

Effect of once-per-day tacrolimus versus twice-per-day ciclosporin on 3-year incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation in Scandinavia (ScanCLAD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence is low regarding the choice of calcineurin inhibitor for immunosuppression after lung transplantation. We aimed to compare the use of tacrolimus once per day with ciclosporin twice per day according to the current definition of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) after lung transplantation.

METHODS

ScanCLAD is an investigator-initiated, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial in Scandinavia evaluating whether an immunosuppressive protocol based on anti-thymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus (once per day), mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids reduces the incidence of CLAD after de novo lung transplantation compared with a protocol using ciclosporin (twice per day), mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Patients aged 18-70 years who were scheduled to undergo double lung transplantation were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either oral ciclosporin (2-3 mg/kg before transplantation and 3 mg/kg [twice per day] from postoperative day 1) or oral tacrolimus (0·05-0·1 mg/kg before transplantation and 0·1-0·2 mg/kg from postoperative day 1). The primary endpoint was CLAD at 36 months post transplantation, determined by repeated lung function tests and adjudicated by an independent committee, and was assessed with a competing-risks analysis with death and re-transplantation as competing events. The primary outcome was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as those who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02936505) and EudraCT (2015-004137-27).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 21, 2016, and July 10, 2019, 383 patients were screened for eligibility. 249 patients underwent double lung transplantation and received at least one dose of study drug, and were thus included in the mITT population: 125 (50%) in the ciclosporin group and 124 (50%) in the tacrolimus group. The mITT population consisted of 138 (55%) men and 111 (45%) women, with a mean age of 55·2 years (SD 10·2), and no patients were lost to follow-up. In the mITT population, CLAD occurred in 48 patients (cumulative incidence 39% [95% CI 31-48]) in the ciclosporin group and 16 patients (13% [8-21]) in the tacrolimus group at 36 months post transplantation (hazard ratio [HR] 0·28 [95% CI 0·15-0·52], log-rank p<0·0001). Overall survival did not differ between groups at 3 years in the mITT population (74% [65-81] for ciclosporin vs 79% [70-85] for tacrolimus; HR 0·72 [95% CI 0·41-1·27], log-rank p=0·25). However, in the per protocol CLAD population (those in the mITT population who also had at least one post-baseline lung function test allowing assessment of CLAD), allograft survival was significantly better in the tacrolimus group (HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·26-0·91], log-rank p=0·021). Adverse events totalled 1516 in the ciclosporin group and 1459 in the tacrolimus group. The most frequent adverse events were infection (453 events), acute rejection (165 events), and anaemia (129 events) in the ciclosporin group, and infection (568 events), anaemia (108 events), and acute rejection (98 events) in the tacrolimus group. 112 (90%) patients in the ciclosporin group and 108 (87%) in the tacrolimus group had at least one serious adverse event.

INTERPRETATION

Immunosuppression based on use of tacrolimus once per day significantly reduced the incidence of CLAD compared with use of ciclosporin twice per day. These findings support the use of tacrolimus as the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor after lung transplantation.

FUNDING

Astellas, the ALF-agreement, Scandiatransplant Organization, and Heart Centre Research Committee, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Drug-Drug Interaction between Tacrolimus and Vonoprazan in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy are often treated with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) to prevent gastric ulcer complications. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is a novel PPI possessing different metabolic pathways from conventional PPIs (e.g., omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole). However, no data are available on the change in blood concentration of tacrolimus after switching rabeprazole, a conventional PPI, to vonoprazan coadministration in the initial period of post-transplantation. This is a retrospective study of 18 kidney transplant recipients. The blood concentration and the concentration to dose (C/D) ratio of tacrolimus were compared before and after switching from rabeprazole to vonoprazan. Impacts of CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms on the drug-drug interaction were also examined. The median (range) trough concentration of tacrolimus was significantly increased from 5.2 (3.6-7.4) to 8.1 (6.1-11.7) ng/mL (p < 0.0005) after switching from rabeprazole to vonoprazan. The C/D ratio of tacrolimus was also significantly increased from 38.1 (16.5-138.1) to 48.9 (26.2-207.2) (p < 0.0005). The percent changes of tacrolimus concentrations and C/D were 65.8% and 41.8%, respectively. CYP2C19 and CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms did not affect the change in concentration and C/D ratio of tacrolimus. The present study indicates that vonoprazan coadministration increases the tacrolimus concentration regardless of CYP2C19 or CYP3A5 genetic polymorphisms. Thus, frequent monitoring of blood tacrolimus concentration is required when vonoprazan is introduced as an intensive gastric acid blocker in the early phase of post-transplantation.

Increased renal function decline in fast metabolizers using extended-release tacrolimus after kidney transplantation

Fast metabolism of immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) is associated with decreased kidney function after renal transplantation (RTx) compared to slow metabolizers. We hypothesized, by analogy, that fast metabolism of extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) is associated with worse renal function. We analyzed data from patients who underwent RTx at three different transplant centers between 2007 and 2016 and received an initial immunosuppressive regimen with ER-Tac, mycophenolate, and a corticosteroid. Three months after RTx, a Tac concentration to dose ratio (C/D ratio) < 1.0 ng/ml · 1/mL defined fast ER-Tac metabolism and ≥ 1.0 ng/ml · 1/mL slow metabolism. Renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR), first acute rejection (AR), conversion from ER-Tac, graft and patient survival were observed up to 60-months. 610 RTx patients were divided into 192 fast and 418 slow ER-Tac metabolizers. Fast metabolizers showed a decreased eGFR at all time points compared to slow metabolizers. The fast metabolizer group included more patients who were switched from ER-Tac (p < 0.001). First AR occurred more frequently (p = 0.008) in fast metabolizers, while graft and patient survival rates did not differ between groups (p = 0.529 and p = 0.366, respectively). Calculation of the ER-Tac C/D ratio early after RTx may facilitate individualization of immunosuppression and help identify patients at risk for an unfavorable outcome.

Thirty Years of Tacrolimus in Clinical Practice

Tacrolimus was discovered in 1984 and entered clinical use shortly thereafter, contributing to successful solid organ transplantation across the globe. In this review, we cover development of tacrolimus, its evolving clinical utility, and issues affecting its current usage. Since earliest use of this class of immunosuppressant, concerns for calcineurin-inhibitor toxicity have led to efforts to minimize or eliminate these agents in clinical regimens but with limited success. Current understanding of the role of tacrolimus focuses more on its efficacy in preventing graft rejection and graft loss. As we enter the fourth decade of tacrolimus use, newer studies utilizing novel combinations (as with the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, everolimus, and T-cell costimulation blockade with belatacept) offer potential for enhanced benefits.

Ten-Year Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplant: A Prospective Cohort Study

Tacrolimus is a cornerstone in the immunosuppressive therapy of kidney transplantation. The once-daily formulation of tacrolimus has been shown to improve adherence of patients without affecting short-term efficacy. However, long-term proof of once-daily tacrolimus efficacy and safety is still lacking. From January 2009 to November 2013, 170 clinically stable kidney transplant patients were offered to change from the ongoing twice-daily tacrolimus (TDT) formulation to a once-daily tacrolimus (ODT) regimen. Kidney transplant recipients agreeing to the change to be treated with an ODT regimen (n = 105, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 57.1 ± 1.6 mL/min/1.73 m²) and patients continuing on a TDT formulation (n = 65, eGFR 52.0 ± 2.2 mL/min/1.73 m²) were prospectively followed (median follow-up time 10.4 and 12.6 years in the ODT and TDT groups, respectively, P = not significant). At the end of the follow-up, patients in both groups experienced similar eGFR (50.4 ± 2.2 vs 48.0 ± 2.7 mL/min/1.73 m² in the ODT and TDT groups, respectively, P = not significant). No differences were observed in biopsy-proven acute rejection, overall graft survival, doubling of serum creatinine, and new onset of proteinuria. The 2 groups also had a comparable rate of death, sepsis, and neoplasia. In conclusion, ODT appears safe and effective in stable kidney graft recipients even 10 years after transplantation. These findings support the use of ODT as a primary tacrolimus formulation in patients with kidney transplantation.

Trough Level and Tacrolimus Variability of Early Converted Once-Daily Tacrolimus: 1-Year Follow-up Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-term transplant outcomes are considered a crucial point for kidney transplantation. Follow-up studies in patients receiving early conversion to once-daily tacrolimus (TAC-OD) are still limited. We aimed to investigate tacrolimus trough level (C_min), intrapatient variability of tacrolimus dose-normalized C_min (TAC-C_min/D), along with other outcomes between twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) and early converted TAC-OD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was a single center, retrospective, cohort study. All new kidney transplant patients who received tacrolimus and presented an estimated glomerular filtration rate of more than 45 mL/min/1.73 m² on the day of hospital discharge were included. Studied patients were divided into the standard TAC-BID and patients who were converted from TAC-BID to TAC-OD on the day of hospital discharge. We followed patients for 1 year after transplantation.

RESULTS

At the first follow-up visit, C_min of TAC-OD was significantly lower than that of TAC-BID. However, C_min and estimated glomerular filtration rate were comparable between TAC-BID and TAC-OD throughout 1-year follow-up. TAC-OD also provided a lower intrapatient variability of TAC-C_min/D compared with TAC-BID when observed after 6 months post transplantation (17.40% and 23.27% for TAC-OD and TAC-BID, respectively; P = .13). The renal function, as well as other adverse outcomes, was similar between 2 formulations.

DISCUSSION

TAC-OD provided a similar C_min with comparable renal function compared with TAC-BID during 1-year follow-up. In addition, TAC-OD is likely to have a benefit of a lower intrapatient variability of tacrolimus.

CONCLUSION

Early conversion from TAC-BID to TAC-OD with 1:1 ratio can be used with close long-term monitoring.

The association between trough blood concentration and systemic exposure of tacrolimus: Comparison between once-daily (Advagraf®) and twice-daily (Prograf®) formulation in de novo kidney transplant recipients

Available data of early conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) to once-daily tacrolimus (TAC-OD) in de novo kidney transplant (KT) recipients are limited. We conducted a prospective study of early conversion to TAC-OD in de novo KT recipients. Eligible patients were enrolled to receive TAC-BID (Prograf®) and then converted to TAC-OD (Advagraf®) by 1:1 ratio, approximately 14 days after KT (range 9-22). Blood samples were investigated for pharmacokinetic parameters before and 7-14 days after the conversion. Fifteen patients were included and provided AUC_0-24 of 202.9 ± 44.4 ng h/mL for TAC-BID (pre-conversion) and 193.0 ± 63.4 ng h/mL for TAC-OD (post-conversion) (p = 0.41). Mean trough blood concentration (C_min) of TAC-BID and TAC-OD was 6.4 ± 1.4 ng/mL and 4.9 ± 1.6 ng/mL (p = 0.01). Correlation coefficient (r) between C_min and AUC_0-24 of TAC-BID and TAC-OD were 0.620 and 0.875. Additional analysis found that patients with a drop of C_min > 30% had a significant lower AUC_0-24 after conversion. Renal function remains stable. We conclude that early conversion to TAC-OD is safe and well tolerated with an indifferent systemic exposure. However, patients with a drop of C_min > 30% after conversion to TAC-OD will require additional dose adjustment.

Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Role of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus has significantly improved outcomes for kidney transplant patients and remains the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy. While improvements in short-term outcomes in transplantation have been achieved in recent years, maintaining long-term graft survival remains a challenge in kidney transplantation. Minimizing risk factors for poor long-term kidney graft function and survival, and modifying tacrolimus regimens in the early and maintenance phases post-transplantation are essential to maintain long-term kidney transplant outcomes. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, resulting in a tightly defined range of optimal drug exposure. Underimmunosuppression is associated with long-term risks, such as the development of donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection, with a high possibility of a decline in kidney function and progression to graft failure. Conversely, prolonged overimmunosuppression carries a risk of drug-related adverse events. This review provides an overview of the differences in the formulation, delivery, and pharmacokinetic profiles between immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus and evaluates the effect of prolonged-release tacrolimus on the risk factors for poor outcomes in kidney transplantation. Recent evidence is used to provide guidance on target tacrolimus trough levels in the early and maintenance phases post-transplantation, with a view to improving long-term kidney graft function.

Long-term, prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in de novo kidney transplant recipients: 5-year prospective follow-up of the ADHERE study patients

The objectives of this study were to assess long-term graft survival, patient survival, renal function, and acute rejections in de novo kidney transplant recipients, treated with once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based therapy. The study was a 5-year non-interventional prospective follow-up of patients from the ADHERE study, a Phase IV 12-month open-label assessment of patients randomized to receive prolonged-release tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arm 1) or sirolimus (Arm 2). From 838 patients in the randomized study, 587 were included in the long-term follow-up, of whom 510 completed the study at year 5. At 1 year post-transplant, graft and patient survival rates were 93.0% and 97.8%, respectively, and at 5 years were 84.0% and 90.8%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no association between graft loss, initial randomized treatment arm, donor age, donor type, or sex. The 5-year acute rejection-free survival rate was 77.4%, and biopsy-confirmed acute rejection-free survival rate was 86.0%. Renal function remained stable over the follow-up period: mean ± SD eGFR 4-variable modification diet in renal disease formula (MDRD4) was 52.3 ± 21.6 ml/min/1.73 m² at 6 months and 52.5 ± 23.0 ml/min/1.73 m² at 5 years post-transplant. These findings support the role of long-term once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, in combination with sirolimus or MMF, for renal transplant recipients in routine clinical practice.

A Prospective, Observational Study of Conversion From Immediate- to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients in France: The OPALE Study

Background

Potential benefits of once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus over the immediate-release formulation include improved adherence to immunosuppressives post transplantation. An observational study was performed to characterize real-world practice surrounding conversion from immediate- to prolonged-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients.

Material/Methods

We performed a prospective, observational study of renal transplant recipients converted from immediate- to prolonged-release tacrolimus capsules. Conversion took place at the baseline visit, within the first 6 months of transplantation (early conversion group) or between 6 and 12 months of transplantation (late conversion group). Data collection was performed at routine follow-up at 6 and 12 months. Endpoints included conversion ratio from immediate- to prolonged-release tacrolimus, reasons for conversion, additional visits due to conversion, safety, and tolerability.

Results

The analysis population comprised 591 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The mean conversion ratio of the daily dose of tacrolimus was 0.98±0.17 in the early group and 0.99±0.09 in the late group. Time from conversion (mean ±SD) to first measurement of trough tacrolimus blood concentration was 12.1±11.6 and 27.6±26.7 days in the early and late groups, respectively. The highest number of additional visits required was 6 in the early conversion group, in 3 patients (0.7%), and 3 in the late conversion group, in 2 patients (1.6%). Conversion from immediate- to prolonged-release tacrolimus was associated with a very low rate of graft rejection.

Conclusions

Favorable clinical outcomes and safety profiles were observed with conversion from immediate- to prolonged-release tacrolimus over 1 year following renal transplantation, with no marked differences between the early and late conversion groups.

Population pharmacokinetics of immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus formulations in liver, kidney and heart transplant recipients

Aims

Develop a population pharmacokinetics model of tacrolimus in organ transplant recipients receiving twice‐daily, immediate‐release (IR‐T; Prograf) and/or once‐daily, prolonged‐release (PR‐T; Advagraf or Astagraf XL) tacrolimus.

Methods

Tacrolimus concentration–time profiles were analysed from 8 Phase II studies in adult and paediatric liver, kidney and heart transplant patients receiving IR‐T and/or PR‐T. A tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic model, including identification of significant covariates, was developed using NONMEM.

Results

Overall, 23,176 tacrolimus concentration records were obtained from 408 patients. A 2‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and elimination described the concentration–time profiles. Tacrolimus absorption rate was 50% slower with PR‐T vs IR‐T. Tacrolimus apparent oral clearance was 44.3 L/h in Whites and 59% higher in Asians. Tacrolimus central volume of distribution was 108 L in males and 55% lower in females; trough concentrations were similar between formulations. Tacrolimus relative bioavailability was similar between formulations (geometric mean ratio PR‐T:IR‐T 95%, 90% confidence intervals: 89%, 101%). Asians had 83% and 51% higher relative bioavailability than Whites and Blacks, respectively, for IR‐T and PR‐T. Whites had 49% and 77% higher relative bioavailability than Blacks for PR‐T and IR‐T, respectively. Blacks had 52% lower relative bioavailability than Whites and Asians for IR‐T and PR‐T. Type of organ transplanted and patient population (adult/paediatric) did not have a significant effect on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics.

Conclusions

This population pharmacokinetic model described data from transplant recipients who received IR‐T and/or PR‐T. Tacrolimus trough concentrations and relative bioavailability were similar between formulations, supporting 1 mg:1 mg conversion from Prograf to Advagraf/Astagraf XL in clinical practice.

Real-World Study of Once-Daily, Extended-Release Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily, Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data with extended-release tacrolimus (ER-T) are lacking in the USA. This study examined clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in kidney transplant patients receiving ER-T in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center analysis (February-June 2016) using data from Northwestern University's Enterprise Data Warehouse. Adult patients receiving a kidney transplant in the preceding 4 years, treated de novo or converted to ER-T from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) within 10 days post-transplantation, and maintained on ER-T (at least 3 months) were included. Patients were matched for demographic and clinical characteristics with IR-T-treated control patients. Endpoints included clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization up to 1 year post-transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 19 ER-T-treated patients were matched with 55 IR-T-treated patients. No ER-T-treated patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or graft failure versus 3 (5.5%) and 3 (5.5%) IR-T-treated patients, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the number of all-cause outpatient visits, readmissions, and all-cause hospitalization days were comparable between groups. Tacrolimus trough levels, days to target level (6-10 ng/mL), and number of required dose adjustments were also similar.

CONCLUSION

Real-world clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization were similar with ER-T and IR-T. Larger studies will need to investigate the trend toward fewer BCAR events, and increased graft survival with ER-T.

FUNDING

Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Plain language summary available for this article.

Envarsus, a novelty for transplant nephrologists: Observational retrospective study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the trough concentrations (Cp_trough) and the tacrolimus dosage regimen after the conversion of Prograf or Advagraf to Envarsus (new pharmaceutical form with MeltDose technology that improves the absorption of fat-soluble drugs) in patients with stable renal transplantation, and their renal function. We selected stable renal transplant patients who were converted to Envarsus. Two periods were defined: Baseline and Conversion (Envarsus) and they were stratified according to the pharmaceutical form used in the Baseline period. Sixty-one patients were included (24 with Advagraf and 37 with Prograf), with an average age of 52years. The mean post-transplant time at the time of conversion to Envarsus was 76.3months and the mean follow-up in the Baseline and Conversion period was 10.1months and 11.6months, respectively. In the Prograf and Envarsus group, the Cp_trough medians were 6.6 vs 6.4 ng/mL (P=.636), with a mean daily dose that decreased significantly from 3mg to 2mg (P<.001), respectively, maintaining the filtration rate. The median Cp_trough values in the Advagraf and Envarsus groups were 5.7ng/mL and 6.3ng/mL (P=.07), with a median daily dose of 7mg and 4mg (P<.001), respectively, and the same renal function. In stable renal transplant patients, the conversion from Advagraf to Envarsus has allowed the dose of tacrolimus to be reduced by 42.9% and, in the case of Prograf, by 33.3%, maintaining similar Cp_trough values, without renal function being altered.

Prolonged-Release vs Immediate-Release Tacrolimus Capsules in Black vs White Kidney Transplant Patients: A Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Data

BACKGROUND

Black kidney transplant patients experience inferior outcomes compared with other ethnicities. Because scrutiny is required when immunosuppressant drugs are used in such at-risk populations, we report the first large-scale clinical efficacy data assessing prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) in black de novo kidney transplant patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used logistic regression and proportionate hazards to compare a composite outcome measure (biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, mortality, and loss to follow-up) in black and white patients in treatment groups longer than 24 weeks, from 3 large Phase III randomized controlled trials. Secondary endpoints included tacrolimus trough concentration, dose, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

RESULTS

The study included 2162 patients whose treatments belonged to two categories (immediate-release tacrolimus: 77 black patients, 721 white patients; and PR-T: 87 black patients, 1277 white patients). Despite demographic factors generally predictive of worse outcomes, efficacy failure among black patients who received PR-T was non-inferior to that among white patients who received either therapy. Compared with immediate-release tacrolimus, black patients who received PR-T achieved stable tacrolimus concentrations 2.5 times faster (21 vs 56 days, P = .04), and more achieved stable target concentrations (76.7% vs 69.3%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with those reported separately in pivotal trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, black patients who received PR-T achieved non-inferior outcomes compared to white patients, despite higher pretransplant risk among black patients. Moreover, PR-T improved the time to achieve, and the likelihood of reaching, stable therapeutic concentrations among black patients, suggesting that PR-T could improve the consistency of tacrolimus exposure in this patient population.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in de novo pediatric transplant recipients randomized to receive immediate- or prolonged-release tacrolimus

Phase 2, parallel-group, multicenter, open-label, 4-week study, comparing PK of PR-T vs IR-T in de novo pediatric patients undergoing primary kidney, liver, or heart transplantation. Patients randomized 1:1 to receive once daily, PR-T-, or twice-daily, IR-T-based regimens; dose adjustments permitted after Day 1. Twenty-four-hour PK profiles collected on Days 1, 7, and 28. Primary endpoint: tacrolimus AUC₂₄ . Secondary end points included tacrolimus C₂₄ and C_max . Endpoints compared between PR-T and IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28. Predefined similarity interval for CIs of LSM ratios: 80%-125%. PK analysis set comprised 33 patients (PR-T, n = 15; IR-T, n = 18). Overall, AUC₂₄ and C_max were lower on Day 1 vs 7 and 28. Geometric LSM ratios of PR-T:IR-T on Days 1, 7, and 28 were 66.3%, 92.5%, 99.9%, respectively, for AUC₂₄ ; 66.3%, 82.2%, 90.9% for C₂₄ ; and 77.3%, 120.3%, 92.2% for C_max . AUC₂₄ 90% CI within predefined similarity interval on Day 28; other 90% CIs fell outside. Linear relationship was similar between AUC₂₄ and C₂₄ , and between tacrolimus formulations, suggesting that the same therapeutic drug monitoring method can be used with both formulations in de novo pediatric allograft recipients.

Once-daily vs twice-daily tacrolimus for de novo living kidney transplantation patients including ABO/HLA compatible and incompatible: A randomized trial

Tacrolimus (TAC) is available as a twice-daily capsule (TAC-BID), once-daily capsule (TAC-QD), and once-daily tablet. Recipients with ABO-incompatible/anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-incompatible transplantation were excluded in previous trials and have thus not been evaluated. We conducted a 5-year trial to determine whether TAC-QD is noninferior to TAC-BID for transplant outcomes. Adults who underwent de novo living kidney transplantation were randomly assigned (62 TAC-QD; 63 TAC-BID). We did not exclude ABO-/HLA- incompatible transplantation. TAC was initiated 7 days preoperatively (0.10 mg/kg/d). Mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab were administered. The primary endpoint was graft failure (non-censored for death). We performed a noninferiority test. The noninferiority margin was 10% in risk difference. Five-year graft failure rates were 6.5% and 9.5% for TAC-QD and TAC-BID, respectively (noninferiority, P = 0.009). The estimated glomerular filtration rates were similar between the groups (noninferiority, P < 0.001). TAC-QD did not have point estimates of risk difference above the inferiority margin in any assessed endpoints. However, a tendency of interaction was observed between biopsy-proven acute rejection and the follow-up period. In a living kidney transplant population with 40% of patients with ABO/HLA incompatibility, the effect of TAC-QD was not appreciably worse on various clinical transplant outcomes than that of TAC-BID over 5 years.

Extended release versus immediate release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 12 months together with other outcomes among adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who received extended release, once daily tacrolimus (ER-Tac) compared to those who received the immediate release, twice daily tacrolimus (IR-Tac) administration.

METHODS

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, we systematically reviewed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared clinical outcomes between ER-Tac versus IR-Tac in KTRs. The systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL without language restriction. The trials registered and reference lists were also searched and reviewed. Data were extracted for eGFR, serum creatinine (Scr), creatinine clearance (CrCl), biopsy-proven acute rejection rate (BPAR), graft survival, and overall patient survival at different times over 24 months after kidney transplant (KT). A meta-analysis was performed to integrate the results from eligible studies.

RESULTS

From 1145 articles screened, 11 RCTs were included. The pooled results of included RCTs showed no significant difference of eGFR at 12 months between ER-Tac and IR-Tac groups (four trials, n = 1738; mean difference - 0.77 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI: - 2.41 to 0.87; p = 0.56; I2 = 0%). Comparing between the two tacrolimus formulations, there were no significant differences of eGFR, CrCl, Scr, BPAR, graft survival, and patient survival at different times over 4 years after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon currently available evidences in KTRs, the impact on kidney allograft function appears to be comparable between ER-Tac and IR-Tac.

Once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus vs twice-daily, immediate-release tacrolimus in de novo living-donor liver transplantation: A Phase 4, randomized, open-label, comparative, single-center study

Randomized, open-label, comparative, single-center, Phase 4, 24-week study comparing pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and efficacy of once-daily, prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) with twice-daily, immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) in adult de novo living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients in Korea. All patients received intravenous tacrolimus from Day 0 (transplantation) for 4 days and were randomized (1:1) to receive oral PR-T or IR-T from Day 5. PK profiles were taken on Days 6 and 21. Primary endpoint: area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hour (AUC_0-24 ). Predefined similarity interval for confidence intervals of ratios: 80%-125%. Secondary endpoints included: tacrolimus concentration at 24 hour (C₂₄ ), patient/graft survival, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). One-hundred patients were included (PR-T, n = 50; IR-T, n = 50). Compared with IR-T, 40% and 66% higher mean PR-T daily doses resulted in similar AUC_0-24 between formulations on Day 6 (PR-T:IR-T ratio of means 96.8%), and numerically higher AUC_0-24 with PR-T on Day 21 (128.8%), respectively. Linear relationship was similar between AUC_0-24 and C₂₄ , and formulations. No graft loss/deaths, incidence of BCAR and TEAEs similar between formulations. Higher PR-T vs IR-T doses were required to achieve comparable systemic exposure in Korean de novo LDLT recipients. PR-T was efficacious; no new safety signals were detected.

Evaluation of Flexible Tacrolimus Drug Concentration Monitoring Approach in Patients Receiving Extended-Release Once-Daily Tacrolimus Tablets

The majority of United States kidney transplant patients are treated with tacrolimus, a drug effective in preventing graft rejection, but with a narrow therapeutic range, necessitating close monitoring to avoid increased risks of transplant rejection or toxicity if the tacrolimus concentration is too low or too high, respectively. The trough drug concentration tests are time sensitive; patients treated on a twice-daily basis have blood draws exactly 12 hours after their previous dose. The schedule's rigidity causes problems for both patients and health care providers. Novel once-daily tacrolimus formulations such as LCPT (an extended-release tablet by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) have allowed for blood draws on a once-daily basis; however, even that schedule can be restrictive. Results from tests taken either before or after that 24-hour target time may be discarded, or worse, may lead to inappropriate dose changes. Data from ASTCOFF, a phase 3B pharmacokinetic clinical trial (NCT02339246), demonstrated that the unique pharmacokinetic curve of LCPT may allow for a therapeutic monitoring window that extends for 3 hours before or after the 24-hour monitoring target. Furthermore, important tools to help clinicians interpret these levels, such as formulas to estimate the 24-hour trough level if an alternative monitoring time is used, were constructed from these data. These study results give treating clinicians access to data that allow them to safely use and monitor LCPT in their patients and expand the body of evidence surrounding differentiation and practical application of the novel LCPT tacrolimus formulation.

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in adults: a systematic review and economic model

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring renal replacement therapy: kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation, followed by immunosuppressive therapy (induction and maintenance therapy) to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival.

OBJECTIVES

To review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd) and rabbit anti-human thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) (Thymoglobulin(®), Sanofi) as induction therapy, and immediate-release tacrolimus (TAC) (Adoport(®), Sandoz; Capexion(®), Mylan; Modigraf(®), Astellas Pharma; Perixis(®), Accord Healthcare; Prograf(®), Astellas Pharma; Tacni(®), Teva; Vivadex(®), Dexcel Pharma), prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf(®) Astellas Pharma), belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arzip(®), Zentiva; CellCept(®), Roche Products; Myfenax(®), Teva), mycophenolate sodium (MPS) (Myfortic(®), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd), sirolimus (SRL) (Rapamune(®), Pfizer) and everolimus (EVL) (Certican(®), Novartis) as maintenance therapy in adult renal transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science (via ISI), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted until 18 November 2014 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Database (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and the American Economic Association's electronic bibliography (via EconLit, EBSCOhost). Included studies were selected according to predefined methods and criteria. A random-effects model was used to analyse clinical effectiveness data (odds ratios for binary data and mean differences for continuous data). Network meta-analyses were undertaken within a Bayesian framework. A new discrete time-state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed, with acute rejection, graft function (GRF) and new-onset diabetes mellitus used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of variable quality, were included. For induction therapy, no treatment appeared more effective than another in reducing graft loss or mortality. Compared with placebo/no induction, rATG and BAS appeared more effective in reducing biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and BAS appeared more effective at improving GRF. For maintenance therapy, no treatment was better for all outcomes and no treatment appeared most effective at reducing graft loss. BEL + MMF appeared more effective than TAC + MMF and SRL + MMF at reducing mortality. MMF + CSA (ciclosporin), TAC + MMF, SRL + TAC, TAC + AZA (azathioprine) and EVL + CSA appeared more effective than CSA + AZA and EVL + MPS at reducing BPAR. SRL + AZA, TAC + AZA, TAC + MMF and BEL + MMF appeared to improve GRF compared with CSA + AZA and MMF + CSA. In the base-case deterministic and probabilistic analyses, BAS, MMF and TAC were predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). When comparing all regimens, only BAS + TAC + MMF was cost-effective at £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

For included trials, there was substantial methodological heterogeneity, few trials reported follow-up beyond 1 year, and there were insufficient data to perform subgroup analysis. Treatment discontinuation and switching were not modelled.

FUTURE WORK

High-quality, better-reported, longer-term RCTs are needed. Ideally, these would be sufficiently powered for subgroup analysis and include health-related quality of life as an outcome.

CONCLUSION

Only a regimen of BAS induction followed by maintenance with TAC and MMF is likely to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013189.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Immunosuppressive therapy for kidney transplantation in children and adolescents: systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease is a long-term irreversible decline in kidney function requiring kidney transplantation, haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. The preferred option is kidney transplantation followed by induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy to reduce the risk of kidney rejection and prolong graft survival.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review and update the evidence for the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basiliximab (BAS) (Simulect,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) and rabbit antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin (Thymoglobuline,(®) Sanofi) as induction therapy and immediate-release tacrolimus [Adoport(®) (Sandoz); Capexion(®) (Mylan); Modigraf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Perixis(®) (Accord Healthcare); Prograf(®) (Astellas Pharma); Tacni(®) (Teva); Vivadex(®) (Dexcel Pharma)], prolonged-release tacrolimus (Advagraf,(®) Astellas Pharma); belatacept (BEL) (Nulojix,(®) Bristol-Myers Squibb), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) [Arzip(®) (Zentiva), CellCept(®) (Roche Products), Myfenax(®) (Teva), generic MMF is manufactured by Accord Healthcare, Actavis, Arrow Pharmaceuticals, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Mylan, Sandoz and Wockhardt], mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus (Rapamune,(®) Pfizer) and everolimus (Certican,(®) Novartis Pharmaceuticals) as maintenance therapy in children and adolescents undergoing renal transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

Clinical effectiveness searches were conducted to 7 January 2015 in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Wiley Online Library) and Web of Science [via Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)], Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) (The Cochrane Library via Wiley Online Library) and Health Management Information Consortium (via Ovid). Cost-effectiveness searches were conducted to 15 January 2015 using a costs or economic literature search filter in MEDLINE (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), NHS Economic Evaluation Databases (via Wiley Online Library), Web of Science (via ISI), Health Economic Evaluations Database (via Wiley Online Library) and EconLit (via EBSCOhost).

REVIEW METHODS

Titles and abstracts were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria, as were full texts of identified studies. Included studies were extracted and quality appraised. Data were meta-analysed when appropriate. A new discrete time state transition economic model (semi-Markov) was developed; graft function, and incidences of acute rejection and new-onset diabetes mellitus were used to extrapolate graft survival. Recipients were assumed to be in one of three health states: functioning graft, graft loss or death.

RESULTS

Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and four non-RCTs were included. The RCTs only evaluated BAS and tacrolimus (TAC). No statistically significant differences in key outcomes were found between BAS and placebo/no induction. Statistically significantly higher graft function (p < 0.01) and less biopsy-proven acute rejection (odds ratio 0.29, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.57) was found between TAC and ciclosporin (CSA). Only one cost-effectiveness study was identified, which informed NICE guidance TA99. BAS [with TAC and azathioprine (AZA)] was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) versus no induction (BAS was dominant). BAS (with CSA and MMF) was not predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus no induction (BAS was dominated). TAC (with AZA) was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY versus CSA (TAC was dominant). A model based on adult evidence suggests that at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000-30,000 per QALY, BAS and TAC are cost-effective in all considered combinations; MMF was also cost-effective with CSA but not TAC.

LIMITATIONS

The RCT evidence is very limited; analyses comparing all interventions need to rely on adult evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

TAC is likely to be cost-effective (vs. CSA, in combination with AZA) at £20,000-30,000 per QALY. Analysis based on one RCT found BAS to be dominant, but analysis based on another RCT found BAS to be dominated. BAS plus TAC and AZA was predicted to be cost-effective at £20,000-30,000 per QALY when all regimens were compared using extrapolated adult evidence. High-quality primary effectiveness research is needed. The UK Renal Registry could form the basis for a prospective primary study.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42014013544.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research HTA programme.

Immunosuppression Adherence in Stable Kidney Transplant Patients Converted From Immediate- to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus in Clinical Practice: A Norwegian Study

Background

This study investigated medication adherence in kidney transplant patients (KTPs) converted from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) to prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T)-based immunosuppression in routine practice.

Methods

Noninterventional, observational, multicenter study in Norway. Included adult KTPs with stable graft function, converted from IR-T (baseline) to PR-T (1 mg:1 mg) in routine practice. Data were collected at baseline, and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 postconversion. Primary endpoint: adherence using the Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale. Secondary assessments: tacrolimus dose and trough levels (target, 3-7 ng/mL), clinical laboratory parameters (eg, estimated glomerular filtration rate [Modified Diet in Renal Disease]), and adverse events.

Results

Ninety-one KTPs (mean ± SD age 47.7 ± 14.3 years) were analyzed. Mean ± SD change in PR-T dose from baseline (4.4 ± 2.4 mg/d) to month 12 was −0.1 ± 0.9 mg/d; mean tacrolimus trough levels remained within target. Overall medication adherence increased from 45.6% at baseline to 58.1% at month 1, but was similar to baseline thereafter; taking and timing adherence followed a similar pattern. Odds ratio (OR) for adherence at month 1 (but not at other time points) was greater versus baseline for overall (OR, 1.71; P = 0.0205), taking (OR, 3.38; P = 0.0004), and timing (OR, 1.77, P = 0.0252) dimensions. Mean ± SD Basel Assessment of Adherence to Immunosuppressive Medication Scale visual analogue scale score at baseline was 96.4 ± 5.5%, and increased postconversion. Estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable (month 12, 61.6 ± 17.7 mL/min per 1.73 m²), as did other laboratory parameters. Two (2.2%) patients had adverse events considered probably/possibly treatment-related.

Conclusions

There was disparity between high, patient-perceived and low, actual adherence. Converting stable KTPs from IR-T to PR-T in routine practice did not impact long-term adherence to immunosuppression; renal function remained stable.

Comparative clinical trial of the variability factors of the exposure indices used for the drug monitoring of two tacrolimus formulations in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Several studies found differences in tacrolimus whole blood trough levels (C0) or area-under-the curve (AUC) between the twice-daily (Tac-BID) and once-daily (Tac-OD) formulations given to kidney transplant recipients at equal doses. As C0 is widely used as a surrogate of the AUC for individual dose adjustment, this study investigated the correlation and proportionality between C0 and the 24h-AUC, depending on the formulation, time post-transplantation, pharmacogenetics traits and other individual characteristics.

METHODS

45 adult kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive either Tac OD or Tac BID. On days 8±1 (D8) and 90±3 (month 3, M3), blood samples were collected over 24h in both groups. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using HPLC-MS/MS and common CYP3A5, CYP3A4 and ABCB1 genotypes characterized using allelic discrimination assays. Tacrolimus population pharmacokinetics was studied in the two patient groups using the Iterative Two Stage (ITS) technique, considering a one-compartment model with two gamma laws to describe the absorption phase. Bayesian estimation based on the C0, C1h and C3h concentrations was employed to estimate individual Tac AUC_0-12h and AUC_12-24h (for Tac BID), or AUC_0-24h (for Tac OD). Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the influence of Tac formulation, post-transplantation period, recipient gender, existing glucose metabolism disorders, and CYP3A5, CYP3A4 and ABCB1 genotypes on C0, AUC_0-24h and the AUC-to-trough concentration ratios.

RESULTS

The Full Analysis Set comprised 22 patients on Tac OD and 20 on Tac BID. Tac exposure indices as well as their time evolution were similar in the two groups. Multi-linear modeling analysis showed that the Tac dose was higher with Tac-OD than Tac-BID, on D8 than at M3 and in CYP3A5 expressors (p<0.0001 for all). No such influence was found on C0 or C24h, while the AUC_0-24h was significantly higher on D8 than at M3. The AUC_0-24h/C0 ratio was not affected by the drug formulation and the polymorphisms studied, but it was significantly lower on D8 than at M3 (p=7.8×10^-5). In contrast, both the post-transplantation period (p=1.53×10^-4), and CYP3A5 expression (p=0.003) had a significant influence on the AUC_0-24h/C24h ratio, explaining 19% and 12% of its variability, respectively. Consistently, for both Tac formulations, the AUC_0-24h was better correlated with C24h than C0, and for Tac-BID the AUC_0-12h was better correlated with C12h than C0.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that the precisely timed 12h- or 24h-post-dose blood concentration (as opposed to the vaguely defined 'trough level') is a convenient surrogate of the 24h-AUC of tacrolimus for the two TAC formulations over the first 3 months post-transplantation. Still, for a given C24h value, AUC_0-24h was higher on D8 and in CYP3A5 expressors. Bayesian estimation of AUC_0-12h for TAC BID and AUC_0-24h for TAC OD is feasible using only 3 time points within the first 3h, thus giving access to the actual overall exposure.

Trough level from twice daily to once daily tacrolimus in early conversion kidney transplant recipients: a prospective study

Background Early conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus (TAC-BID) to once-daily tacrolimus (TAC-OD) provides a greater benefit of reducing under-exposure of TAC-OD during the first period after transplantation. Information regarding the conversion dose among Asian kidney transplant recipients is still limited. Objective This study aimed to compare the trough levels (C_min) of TAC-BID (Prograf^®) and TAC-OD (Advagraf^®). The values were obtained from early conversion intervention by 1:1 milligram per-milligram. Setting A university-based hospital. Method This study employed a single-center, open-label, prospective and single-armed design. Fifteen de novo standard risk kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. Fourteen days after transplantation, the C_min of TAC-BID (pre-conversion C_min) was determined. Subsequently, TAC-BID was converted to TAC-OD with a similar dose. The C_min of TAC-OD was first measured at a steady state (immediate post-conversion C_min) and compared. All enrolled patients received therapeutic monitoring at the first and second months. Main outcome measure Pre-conversion C_min of TAC-BID and immediate post-conversion C_min of TAC-OD. Results The immediate post-conversion C_min was found to be 23% lowered than the pre-conversion C_min. However, the C_min of TAC-OD was found to be similar to the pre-conversion C_min compared during the follow-up period. Renal function was found to be stable in all patients over 2 months. Conclusion Early conversion therapy was associated with a significantly lower immediate post-conversion C_min but comparable C_min throughout the follow-up period. The "one to one conversion ratio" from TAC-BID to TAC-OD could be performed among Asian de novo kidney transplant recipients at an early period after transplantation.

Effect of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Rivaroxaban and Apixaban on the Disposition of Calcineurin Inhibitors in Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) share certain metabolic pathways, but whether DOACs influence CNI exposure has not been assessed.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was performed including 39 organ recipients treated with the combination of a CNI and rivaroxaban (n = 29) or apixaban (n = 10). Dose-corrected CNI trough concentrations (C0/D) during 200 days before and after DOAC initiation were recorded (n = 261), together with covariates known to influence CNI disposition such as steroid dose and hematocrit. The average C0/D before and during DOAC therapy was compared using paired samples t test. Multivariable mixed models were constructed to estimate the effect of DOAC and other predictors on C0/D at each time point.

RESULTS

Group average C0/D was not significantly different before and during DOAC therapy for any CNI-DOAC combination (P = 0.089-0.761), although C0/D changed >20% in 19/39 patients (13 increases, 6 decreases). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors of tacrolimus C0/D were methylprednisolone dose (P = 0.039) and concomitant use of a CYP3A inhibitor (P = 0.007). The subgroup analysis per DOAC showed a limited but significant effect of rivaroxaban on tacrolimus C0/D (9.2% increase, P = 0.042). Independent predictors of ciclosporin C0/D were age (P = 0.018) and use of any DOAC (12.1% increase, P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban, and particularly rivaroxaban, may cause a limited (<20%) increase in CNI trough concentration, an effect that is unlikely to trigger a dose change. It may be prudent to perform an additional CNI trough concentration measurement 5-7 days after DOAC initiation, but preemptive CNI dose changes are not warranted based on these observations.

Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving 3 Direct-Acting Antivirals as Treatment for Hepatitis C Infection

BACKGROUND

Interactions between tacrolimus and cyclosporine (CSA) and the 3 direct-acting antiviral regimen (3D) of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, and dasabuvir necessitate a priori dose adjustments for the immunosuppressants to achieve desired levels. Modeling and simulations based on data in healthy subjects predicted that tacrolimus 0.5 mg every 7 days or 0.2 mg every 3 days, and CSA at one-fifth the total daily dose administered once daily, would achieve desired trough concentrations (Ctrough) during 3D treatment. The success of these dosing recommendations was evaluated by analyzing pharmacokinetic data from liver transplant recipients in the CORAL-I study.

METHODS

A population pharmacokinetic model was developed using tacrolimus dosing and Ctrough data before and during 3D treatment (n = 29). The model was used to simulate various tacrolimus dosing regimens and predict tacrolimus concentration-time profiles during 3D treatment. CSA Ctrough data before and during 3D treatment (n = 5) were also summarized.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately described tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles during the first 4 weeks of 3D treatment. Estimated tacrolimus Ctrough values (median; interquartile range) before and during 3D treatment were comparable (5.7 ng/mL; 4.9-6.5 ng/mL versus 5.2 ng/mL; 4.2-6.3 ng/mL, respectively). Based on simulations, in a patient with a starting Ctrough of 6 ng/mL, 0.5 mg tacrolimus every 7 or 14 days or 0.2 mg tacrolimus every 3 days will result in Ctrough levels of 6-9 ng/mL, 4-6 ng/mL, and 6-10 ng/mL, respectively, during 3D treatment. For CSA, Ctrough values (median; interquartile range) before and during 3D treatment were comparable (126 ng/mL; 94-140 ng/mL versus 104 ng/mL; 82-140 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Observed data for tacrolimus and CSA in liver transplant recipients confirm that the recommended dosing strategies are valid and therapeutic levels of immunosuppression can be maintained during 3D treatment.

Pharmacokinetic considerations related to therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

Tacrolimus (Tac) is the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation and will probably remain so. Excluding belatacept, no new immunosuppressive drugs were registered for the prevention of acute rejection during the last decade. For several immunosuppressive drugs, clinical development halted because they weren't sufficiently effective or more toxic. Areas covered: Current methods of monitoring Tac treatment, focusing on traditional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), controversies surrounding TDM, novel matrices, pharmacogenetic and pharmacodynamic monitoring are discussed. Expert opinion: Due to a narrow therapeutic index and large interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, TDM has been implemented for individualization of Tac dose to maintain drug efficacy and minimize the consequences of overexposure. The relationship between predose concentrations and the occurrence of rejection or toxicity is controversial. Acute cellular rejection also occurs when the Tac concentration is within the target range, suggesting that Tac whole blood concentrations don't necessarily correlate with pharmacological effect. Intracellular Tac, the unbound fraction of Tac or pharmacodynamic monitoring could be better biomarkers/tools for adequate Tac exposure - research into this has been promising. Traditional TDM, perhaps following pre-emptive genotyping for Tac-metabolizing enzymes, must suffice for a few years before these strategies can be implemented in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of de Novo and Early Use of Extended-release Tacrolimus in Heart Transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The extended-release formulation of tacrolimus (ERT) allows once-daily dosage, thus simplifying the immunosuppressive regimen. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of the de novo and early use of ERT in heart transplantation.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective, multicenter study comparing the safety and efficacy of the de novo use of ERT (ERT group [n=94]), standard-release tacrolimus (SRT group [n=42]) and early conversion (EC) from SRT to ERT (EC group [n=44]). Extended-release tacrolimus was used between 2007 and 2012. One-year incidence rates of acute rejection, infection, and cytomegalovirus infection were analyzed. Safety parameters were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant between-group differences in the daily dose or trough levels of tacrolimus during the first year after transplantation. The rejection incidence rates were 1.05 (95%CI, 0.51-1.54), 1.39 (95%CI, 1.00-1.78), and 1.11 (95%CI, 0.58-1.65) episodes per patient-years in the SRT group, ERT group, and EC group, respectively (P=.48). The infection incidence rates were 0.75 (95%CI, 0.60-0.86), 0.62 (95%CI, 0.52-0.71), and 0.55 (95%CI, 0.40-0.68) in the SRT group, ERT group, and EC group, respectively (P=.46). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 23.8%, 20.2%, and 18.2% of the patients, respectively (P=.86). No significant between-group differences were found in laboratory tests or in allograft function. There was 1 death in the SRT group and 2 in the ERT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both de novo and early use of ERT seem to have similar safety and efficacy profiles to conventional SRT-based immunosuppression.

Relative bioavailability of single doses of prolonged-release tacrolimus administered as a suspension, orally or via a nasogastric tube, compared with intact capsules: a phase 1 study in healthy participants

OBJECTIVE

Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant widely used in solid organ transplantation, is available as a prolonged-release capsule for once-daily oral administration. In the immediate postsurgical period, if patients cannot take intact capsules orally, tacrolimus therapy is often initiated as a suspension of the capsule contents, delivered orally or via a nasogastric tube. This study evaluated the relative bioavailability of prolonged-release tacrolimus suspension versus intact capsules in healthy participants.

DESIGN

A phase 1, open-label, single-dose, cross-over study.

SETTING

A single clinical research unit.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 20 male participants, 18-55 years old, entered and completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants received nasogastric administration of tacrolimus 10 mg suspension in treatment period 1, with randomisation to oral administration of suspension or intact capsules in periods 2 and 3. Blood concentration-time profile over 144 hours was used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary end point: relative bioavailability of prolonged-release intact capsule versus oral or nasogastric administration of prolonged-release tacrolimus suspension (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity post-tacrolimus dose (AUC_0-∞); AUC measured until the last quantifiable concentration (AUC_0-tz); maximum observed concentration (C_max); time to C_max (T_max)). Tolerability was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

Relative bioavailability of prolonged-release tacrolimus suspension administered orally was similar to intact capsules, with a ratio of least-square means for AUC_0-tz and AUC_0-∞ of 1.05 (90% CI 0.96 to 1.14). Bioavailability was lower with suspension administered via a nasogastric tube versus intact capsules (17%; ratio 0.83; CI 0.76 to 0.92). C_max was higher for oral and nasogastric suspension (30% and 28%, respectively), and median T_max was shorter (difference 1.0 and 1.5 hours postdose, respectively) versus intact capsules (2.0 hours). Single 10 mg doses of tacrolimus were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with intact capsules, the rate of absorption of prolonged-release tacrolimus from suspension was faster, leading to higher peak blood concentrations and shorter time to peak; relative bioavailability was similar with suspension administered orally.

Factors relevant to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant: a systematic review

Background Medication non-adherence is a major issue after transplant that can lead to misdiagnosis, rejection, poor health affecting quality of life, graft loss or death. Several estimations of adherence and related factors have previously been described but conclusions leave doubt as to the most accurate assessment method. Aim of the review To identify the factors most relevant to medication non-adherence in kidney transplant in current clinical practice. Method This systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO data base and follows the Prisma checklist. Articles in English in three databases from January 2009 to December 2014 were analysed. A synthesis was made to target adherence assessment methods, their prevalence and significance. Results Thirty-seven studies were analysed rates of non-adherence fluctuating from 1.6 to 96%. Assessment methods varied from one study to another, although self-reports were mainly used. It appears that youth (≤50 years old), male, low social support, unemployment, low education, ≥3 months post graft, living donor, ≥6 comorbidities, ≥5 drugs/d, ≥2 intakes/d, negative beliefs, negative behavior, depression and anxiety were the factors significantly related to non-adherence. Conclusion As there are no established guidelines, consideration should be given to more than one approach to identify medication non-adherence although self-reports should remain the cornerstone of adherence assessment.

A Steady-State Head-to-Head Pharmacokinetic Comparison of All FK-506 (Tacrolimus) Formulations (ASTCOFF): An Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized, Two-Arm, Three-Period Crossover Study

This two-sequence, three-period crossover study is the first pharmacokinetic (PK) study to compare all three innovator formulations of tacrolimus (twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus capsules [IR-Tac]; once-daily extended-release tacrolimus capsules [ER-Tac]; novel once-daily tacrolimus tablets [LCPT]). Stable renal transplant patients were dosed with each drug for 7 days, and blood samples were obtained over 24 h. Thirty subjects were included in the PK analysis set. A conversion factor of 1:1:0.80 for IR-Tac:ER-Tac:LCPT was used; no dose adjustments were permitted during the study. The median (interquartile range) total daily dose was 6.0 (4.0-8.0) mg for IR-Tac and ER-Tac and 4.8 (3.3-6.3) for LCPT. Significantly higher exposure on a per milligram basis, lower intraday fluctuation and prolonged time (Tmax ) to peak concentration (Cmax ) were found for LCPT versus IR-Tac or ER-Tac. ER-Tac showed no differences versus IR-Tac in exposure, Cmax , Tmax or fluctuation. The observed exposure of IR-Tac was used to normalize exposure for LCPT and ER-Tac, resulting in the following recommended total daily dose conversion rates: IR-Tac:ER-Tac, +8%; IR-Tac:LCPT, -30%; ER-Tac:LCPT, -36%. After exposure normalization, Cmax was ~17% lower for LCPT than for IR-Tac or ER-Tac; Cmin was ~6% lower for LCPT compared with IR-Tac and 3% higher compared with ER-Tac.

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Twice- and Once-daily Tacrolimus in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the differences in pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles after the 1:1 ratio-based conversion from a twice-daily to a once-daily tacrolimus formulation (TD-TAC and OD-TAC, respectively) in pediatric recipients of kidney transplants.

METHODS

TD-TAC was initially administered to 29 pediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantations between April 2010 and September 2015 and were then subsequently switched to OD-TAC. The switch dose ratio was 1:1, and the 24-hour complete PK parameter assessment was performed before and after the regimen was changed from TD-TAC to OD-TAC.

RESULTS

The mean total daily dose at baseline was 5.5 ± 2.9 mg (0.18 ± 0.10 mg/kg body weight). Consecutive PK studies revealed no significant difference in the mean time to achieve maximum concentrations and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC_0-24) of both drug formulations. However, the mean trough concentration (C_min) and the maximum concentration of OD-TAC were 22% and 6% lower and higher, respectively, than those of TD-TAC. Therefore, a better correlation was observed between the AUC_0-24 and C_min of OD-TAC than between those of TD-TAC.

CONCLUSIONS

After the change from TD-TAC to OD-TAC, the AUC_0-24 values were equivalent despite a 22% reduction in C_min. C_min may therefore be an excellent predictor in the therapeutic drug monitoring of OD-TAC because of its superior correlation with AUC_0-24.

Pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release tacrolimus and implications for use in solid organ transplant recipients

Prolonged-release tacrolimus was developed as a once-daily formulation with ethylcellulose as the excipient, resulting in slower release and reduction in peak concentration (Cmax ) for a given dose compared with immediate-release tacrolimus, which is administered twice daily. This manuscript reviews pharmacokinetic information on prolonged-release tacrolimus in healthy subjects, in transplant recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus, and in de novo kidney and liver transplant recipients. As with the immediate-release formulation, prolonged-release tacrolimus shows a strong correlation between trough concentration (Cmin ) and area under the 24-hour time-concentration curve (AUC24 ), indicating that trough whole blood concentrations provide an accurate measure of drug exposure. We present the pharmacokinetic similarities and differences between the two formulations, so that prescribing physicians will have a better understanding of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus.

Overview of extended release tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (Prograf^©, Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd, Staines, United Kingdom; referred to as tacrolimus-BID) is an immunosuppressive agent to prevent and treat allograft rejection in kidney transplant recipients in combination with mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, with or without basiliximab induction. The drug has also been studied in liver, heart and lung transplant; however, these are currently off-label indications. An extended release tacrolimus formulation (Advagraf^©, Astagraf XL^©) allows for once-daily dosing, with the potential to improve adherence. Extended release tacrolimus has similar absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion to tacrolimus-BID. Phase I pharmacokinetic trials comparing extended release tacrolimus and tacrolimus-BID have demonstrated a decreased maximum concentration (C_max) and delayed time to maximum concentration (t_max) with the extended release formulation; however, AUC_0-24 was comparable between formulations. Overall extended release tacrolimus has a very similar safety and efficacy profile to tacrolimus-BID. It is not recommended in the use of liver transplant patient’s due to the increased risk of mortality in female recipients. There has been minimal data regarding the use of extended release tacrolimus in heart and lung transplant recipients. With the current data available for all organ groups the extended release tacrolimus should be dosed in a 1:1 fashion, the exception may be the cystic fibrosis population where their initial dose may need to be higher.

A Pilot Study of the Pharmacokinetics of the Modified-Release Once-Daily Tacrolimus Formulation Administered to Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Sustained-release once-daily tacrolimus pharmacokinetics have not yet been characterized in de novo living-donor liver transplant recipients. Here, a 12-week, phase IV, single center, open-label, prospective pilot study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics of this formulation in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received continuous intravenous infusion of tacrolimus on days 0 to 5 after transplant, which was followed by oral once-daily sustained-release tacrolimus. Two 24-hour pharmacokinetics profiles were generated for 10 patients on days 6 and 14. Secondary endpoints were minimum (trough level) and maximum whole blood concentrations, time to maximum concentration, and incidences of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Mean doses (± standard deviation) of sustained-release tacrolimus on days 6 and 14 were 0.14 ± 0.03 and 0.17 ± 0.04 mg/kg. Levels were within the recommended range throughout the study. When the actual dose was examined, area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours on day 14 was 1.8-fold higher than that on day 6 (423.9 vs 235.7 ng × h/mL). When tacrolimus was normalized to 0.1 mg/kg, area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours on day 14 was 1.5-fold higher than on day 6 (279.3 vs 183.4 ng × h/mL). When we used the actual dose, we found the correlation coefficient between area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours and trough level to be higher on day 6 (r = 0.87) than on day 14 (r = 0.691). No acute rejections, graft losses, patient deaths, or drug-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial intravenous followed by sustained-release tacrolimus was safe and efficacious in living-donor liver transplant recipients. The mean area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours on day 14 was higher than previously reported; this difference may reflect cautious dosing regimens.

Trial design and endpoints in clinical transplant research

The number of clinical trials in solid organ transplantation is progressively increasing year on year, but the quality of design and reporting still varies considerably. The constraints on organ availability, improving short-term outcomes, ethics and timescales involved in organ transplantation present unique challenges for trials in this field. An understanding of the methodology and potential pitfalls in clinical research is essential both to interpret trial results and to design robust studies. This review summarizes the scope and quality of reporting in existing transplant clinical trials and details aspects of clinical trial methodology with particular relevance to transplantation. We highlight initiatives designed to improve the quality of this process to ensure that the results of clinical trials are robust, well reported and of use in everyday clinical practice.