Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with vaginal extraction: initial report

Graft retrieval incisions in minimally invasive donor nephrectomy: Systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various incisions are employed for graft extraction during minimally invasive donor nephrectomy, but an overarching synthesis of associated short-term donor outcomes is lacking.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus for studies comparing ≥2 graft extraction incisions in laparoscopic or robotic donor nephrectomy with ≥10 patients per arm. Eligible study designs included randomized trials, case-control, and cohort studies. Primary outcomes were donor length of stay (LOS); in-hospital analgesic requirement; and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were warm ischemia time (WIT), total operation time (TOT), and estimated blood loss (EBL). Random-effects Frequentist network meta-analyses were conducted for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies (4702 patients) were shortlisted. Six incisions were analyzed: iliac, Pfannenstiel, midline hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL), midline umbilical, flank and transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). The flank incision had significantly longer LOS than all other incisions. LOS was significantly longer in Pfannenstiel than iliac incision (mean difference [MD] = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.002-0.58 days). Midline HAL had significantly shorter TOT than most other incisions. Midline umbilical incisions had significantly higher WIT than midline HAL and Pfannenstiel incisions. Midline HAL had shorter WIT than transvaginal NOTES (MD = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.05-1.56 min). No major differences were seen in analgesia requirement, postoperative complications and EBL.

CONCLUSION

Six different incisions for graft retrieval are broadly comparable across most short-term outcomes although long-term outcomes remain to be elucidated. Iliac and Pfannenstiel incisions yielded similar outcomes besides marginally lower LOS for the former. Midline incision for HAL may be associated with shorter TOT, and transvaginal NOTES is an effective technique for selected female donors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023445407.

Robotic Full Lobe Hepatectomy With Natural Orifice Extraction: Case Series Describing the Novel Technique of Robotic Major Hepatectomy and Transvaginal Specimen Extraction

MINI-ABSTRACT

A minimally invasive approach to partial hepatectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction is safe and feasible with the potential to improve the cosmetic outcome, minimize postoperative narcotic utilization, and shorten hospital length of stay. This series describes the initial experience using this novel technique.

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Standard and Transvaginal Kidney Extraction in Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy

Background: A limited number of publications are available in the literature regarding laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy with vaginal extraction (LLDN-VE) for kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare long-term recipient outcomes of standard laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (S-LLDN) and LLDN-VE. Methods: A total of 652 patients [119 LLDN-VE (18.3%) and 533 S-LLDN (81.7%)] were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. The data related to donor and recipient demographics, surgical and anatomical characteristics, and recipient and graft status were retrieved and compared using nonparametric statistical methods. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were applied to compute survival according to the surgical technique. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 73.0 ± 25.4 months for S-LLDN and 69.8 ± 20.4 months for LLDN-VE recipients. The main determinants of long-term outcomes were the serum creatinine (SCr) levels, death-censored graft survival, and recipient survival at the end of the post-op 5th year. LLDN-VE recipients' discharge SCr was found to be statistically lower (P = .049) than S-LLDN patients. Graft survival rates censored for death were 93.8% for the S-LLDN and 93.3% for the LLDN-VE recipients. Cox regression analysis showed significance for younger donor age (P = .010) with the application of 17 parameters, indicating better graft survival outcomes for kidney recipients with younger donors. Conclusions: Compared with the standard method, the long-term results of LLDN-VE are in accordance with or could even be more advantageous than S-LLDN in certain aspects. LLDN-VE appears to be a feasible, safe, and cosmetically superior approach with no negative postoperative sexual or morbid effects on the donor.

Outcome of Kidney Transplantation With Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience

AIM

The aim of this study is to present the outcome of kidney transplantation after laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) compared with conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in a single-center experience.

METHODS

This retrospective study compares data from the initial experience with 110 consecutive LESS DN donors and their recipients (group A) with 205 consecutive conventional LDN donors and their recipients (group B).

RESULTS

This study compared 110 LESS DNs completed in an 18-month period with 205 LDNs completed in the immediately preceding 42-month period. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. In groups A and B, respectively, the incidence of immediate graft function was 90% vs 91.2%, slow graft function was 9% vs 5.3%, delayed graft function was 0.9% vs 2.9%, graft loss was 0.9% vs 2.9%, and death with a functioning graft was 0.9% vs 1.5%. The mean serum creatinine levels were 1.3 ± 0.93 mg/dL vs 1.4 ± 1.2 mg/dL (P = .447), 1.1 ± 0.33 mg/dL vs 1.2 ± 0.75 mg/dL (P = .184), and 1.05 ± 0.25 mg/dL vs 1.1 ± 0.39 mg/dL (P = .224) at 7, 30, and 365 days after transplantation. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was 88 ± 18.2 vs 83 ± 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .004). The mean donor operative times in groups A and B were 175.9 ± 24.9 minutes vs 199.88 ± 37.06 minutes (P = .0001), respectively, and the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 minutes vs 3.64 ± 1.38 minutes, respectively (P = .0001). The mean body mass index, the incidence of complex vascular anatomy, and the rate of complications were the same in the 2 donor groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of kidney transplantation after LESS DN is comparable to conventional LDN. LESS DN can be employed as the primary approach for kidney donation with low donor risk and without compromising recipient outcomes.

Perioperative Events and Complications in Minimally Invasive Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy has become a fully implemented and accepted procedure. Donors have to be well educated about all risks and details during the informed consent process. For this to be successful, more information regarding short-term outcome is necessary.

METHODS

A literature search was performed; all studies discussing short-term complications after minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy were included. Outcomes evaluated were intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversions, operative and warm ischemia times, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain score, convalescence, quality of life, and costs.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety articles were included in the systematic review, 41 in the meta-analysis. Conversion rate was 1.1%. Intraoperative complication rate was 2.3%, mainly bleeding (1.5%). Postoperative complications occurred in 7.3% of donors, including infectious complications (2.6%), of which mainly wound infection (1.6%) and bleeding (1.0%). Reported mortality rate was 0.01%. All minimally invasive techniques were comparable with regard to complication or conversion rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The used techniques for minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy are safe and associated with low complication rates and minimal risk of mortality. These data may be helpful to develop a standardized, donor-tailored informed consent procedure for live donor nephrectomy.

Novel method of laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice specimen extraction for live donor nephrectomy: single-port laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and transvaginal graft extraction

Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (DN) has been established as a useful alternative to the traditional open methods of procuring kidneys. To maximize the advantages of the laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) method, we applied natural orifice specimen extraction to LESS-DN. A 46-year-old woman with no previous abdominal surgery history volunteered to donate her left kidney to her husband and underwent single-port laparoscopic DN with transvaginal extraction. The procedure was completed without intraoperative complications. The kidney functioned well immediately after transplantation, and the donor and recipient were respectively discharged 2 days and 2 weeks postoperatively. Single-port laparoscopic DN and transvaginal graft extraction is feasible and safe.

[INITIAL EXPERIENCE OF TRANSVAGINAL EXTRACTION OF THE KIDNEY FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY IN OUR DEPARTMENT]

PURPOSE

We report the detailed technique and results of transvaginal extraction of the kidney following laparoscopic nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From August 2013 onward, we planned to perform transvaginal extraction of the kidney following laparoscopic nephrectomy in a total of 6 female patients. Of the 6 patients, 5 underwent the procedure. After completion of the primary laparoscopic nephrectomy and entrapping the removed kidney, the patients were placed in the supine lithotomy position. A transverse posterior colpotomy was created transvaginally at the apex of the posterior fornix. An opening was made in the peritoneum bluntly with the fingers under laparoscopic view. After the drawstring of the entrapped specimen was delivered into the vagina, the specimen was extracted intact via the vagina. When the vaginal wall was too tight for a large specimen, the incision was extended on the affected side. After removal of the specimen, the peritoneum was sutured laparoscopically, and the posterior colpotomy incision was repaired transvaginally.

RESULTS

Transvaginal extraction was successful in 5 patients. The mean operative time for the vaginal extraction procedure was 59 minutes. Blood loss was minimal. The mean specimen weight was 447 g (range 271 to 655 g). No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperatively, one case needed intermittent catheterization for a few days because of temporal dysfunction of the bladder.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal extraction is an efficacious and minimally morbid technique for removing the intact kidney after laparoscopic nephrectomy.

LESS living donor nephrectomy: Surgical technique and results

Purpose:

We present the findings of 50 patients undergoing pure trans-umbilical laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) living donor nephrectomy (LDN), between February 2010 and May 2014.

Materials and Methods:

Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery LDN was performed through an umbilical incision. Different trocars were used, namely Gelpoint (Applied Mιdical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA) SILS port (Covidien, Hamilton, Bermuda), R-port (Olympus Surgical, Orangeburg, NY) and standard trocars, inserted through the same skin incision but using separate fascial punctures. The standard laparoscopic technique was employed. The kidney was pre-entrapped in a retrieval bag and extracted trans-umbilically. Data were collected prospectively including questionnaires containing patient reported oral pain medication duration and time to recovery.

Results:

LESS LDN was successful in all patients. Mean warm ischemia time was 6.2 min (3–15), mean procedure time was 233.2 min (172–300), and hospitalization stay was 3.94 days (3–7) with a visual analogue pain score at discharge of 1.32 (0–3). No intraoperative complications occurred. The mean time of oral pain medication was 8.72 days (1–20) and final scar length was 4.06 cm (3–5). Each allograft was functional.

Conclusion:

Although challenging, trans-umbilical LESS LDN seems to be feasible and safe. Hence, LESS has the potential to improve cosmetic results and decrease morbidity.

Laparoscopic Transplantation Following Transvaginal Insertion of the Kidney: Description of Technique and Outcome

Laparoscopic kidney transplantation (LKT) is well accepted modality of treatment for ESRD patients at our center. Usually, the kidney is inserted through small Pfannenstiel incision. With the permission of the Internal Review Board, we carried out LKT in eight female recipients following insertion of the kidney through the vagina. The kidney was procured by the retroperitoneoscopic approach. Antibiotic prophylaxis was given. All cases were carried out successfully with immediate graft function and 100% graft and patient survival at 1 year of follow-up. Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 month and 1 year was similar to eight randomly selected female recipients who underwent open kidney transplantation (OKT). No analgesia was required in seven out of eight patients after the 3rd postoperative day. In summary, vaginal insertion of kidney and LKT is safe and feasible in a selected group of patients. It is associated with better analgesia and has similar allograft function as compare to OKT.

Transvaginal route for kidney extraction in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Background and Objectives:

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare conventional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy with transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery–assisted living-donor nephrectomy in terms of feasibility and reproducibility.

Methods:

A total of 115 consecutive female patients who underwent laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy (n = 70) or transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery–assisted living-donor nephrectomy (n = 45) were included and compared in terms of operative characteristics, as well as donor and recipient outcomes.

Results:

No significant difference was observed between the laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy and transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery–assisted living-donor nephrectomy groups in terms of mean duration of warm and cold ischemia, operation time, length of hospital stay, arterial anastomoses, visual analog scale pain scores, serum creatinine levels, and receiver outcomes, whereas a significantly higher number of venous anastomoses was noted in the laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy group than in the transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery–assisted living-donor nephrectomy group (P = .029).

Conclusions:

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery–assisted living-donor nephrectomy seems to be a feasible and reproducible alternative to conventional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy in female donors provided the viability of the vagina as an organ retrieval route.

Minimally invasive donor nephrectomy: innovations

From open surgery to laparoscopic surgery, there has been an evolution in the surgical technique for live donor nephrectomy which goes beyond patient comfort. As a unique operation where the margin for error is nearly nil, and where the patient is essentially harmed for an altruistic goal, ensuring the best possible result is vital. Additionally, as the morbidity of the operation decreases, there is a theoretical increase in the donor pool. In this review, the latest techniques for minimally invasive live donor nephrectomy are covered, including new approaches such as laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, natural orifice surgery, and new tools such as robotics.

Comparison of three different techniques of extraction in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Aim:

We compare the outcome of three different methods of graft extraction after a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Materials and Methods:

After a conventional five port laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, specimen was extracted through one of three approaches: 1. Iliac fossa (IF) incision and hand extraction, 2. Midline (MD) periumbilical with a lower polar fat stitch incorporating gonadal vein for traction while retrieval, and 3. Pfannensteil (PF) with Gel port extraction. Estimated blood loss, operating time, warm ischemia time, incision length, pain score, analgesic consumption, hospital stay, wound complications, graft complications and recipient creatinine at 6 weeks were analyzed.

Results:

Warm ischemia time was significantly reduced in PF group when compared to other groups. Length of the incision was less in the MD group compared to other groups. Wound complications were significantly less in PF group when compared to other groups. Graft extraction complications were significantly high in MD group compared to other two groups.

Conclusion:

Based on the results obtained, our current method of preference is by Pfannensteil incision. A controlled extraction with the use of a hand assist device would be best for donor safety and to avoid graft related complications.

Recent advances of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urological surgery

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery designates a surgical procedure that utilizes one or more patent natural orifices of the body with the intention to puncture a hollow viscera in order to enter the abdominal cavity. First carried out at the beginning of the 2000s in experimental models, it can be considered the natural evolution of laparoscopy towards the ideal of scarless surgery, as the avoidance of a large abdominal scar is associated with better cosmetic results and better recovery. However, the technology currently available does not allow the performance of complete pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery procedures. The surgical tools used are not specially designed for this approach, so difficulties in retracting organs, bleeding control and clashing of instruments are the main obstacle surgeons face. For this reason, the current available technique is the so-called hybrid approach, where a natural orifice approach is combined with some abdominal trocars, using the natural orifice as the exit door for the specimen removal. As not many comparative studies have been published evaluating the advantages of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in front of traditional laparoscopic surgery, a review of the history of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, and an assessment of the available evidence of this technique regarding renal and urological pelvic surgery are performed in this article.

Innovative strategies in living donor kidney transplantation

In an effort to increase living donor transplantation while minimizing risk and morbidity, recent advances have been made in surgical technique, kidney paired donation, desensitization, identification of living donors and research into living donor outcomes. Single-port nephrectomy and vaginal extraction have reduced donor nephrectomy incision size. Transport of live donor kidneys has reduced geographic barriers to kidney paired donation, and participation of compatible pairs and nondirected donors has increased match opportunities for incompatible pairs participating in this modality. ABO-incompatible transplantation can now be successfully performed without high-intensity immunomodulation, and HLA-incompatible transplantation has been shown in a large single-center study to provide profound survival benefit compared with waiting for a compatible donor. Complement inhibition is an exciting, emerging approach that may facilitate incompatible transplantation and treat antibody-mediated rejection. Educational and communications interventions are proving valuable in helping patients find living donors, and large studies continue to provide reassurance to carefully screened living donors that risks are very low. As living donors are critical to addressing the profound organ shortage, efforts to increase living donation remain important.

Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future?

BACKGROUND

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) uses natural orifices to access the abdominal cavity. We adapted NOTES to perform transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in living donors.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and reproducibility of this procedure and compare it with conventional laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy (LLDN).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

From July 2009 to October 2010, 20 women underwent transvaginal NOTES-assisted living donor nephrectomy (LDN) in our centre. We compared the prospectively collected clinical data of each donor with those of a contemporaneous matched pair of conventional LLDNs (40 donors).

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

The procedure was performed using three abdominal trocars and one trocar through the vaginal wall.

MEASUREMENTS

Variables evaluated for donors were procedure length, blood loss, warm ischaemia time (WIT), complications, hospital stay, and first-month creatinine nadir. In the transvaginal LDN group, sexual function was assessed with the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire before and after surgery. Variables evaluated for recipients were complications, graft function, and creatinine evolution.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The procedure was completed in all cases. Operative variables were similar for both groups except for WIT, which was longer in the transvaginal LDN group (p<0.001) without consequences for graft functioning. One transvaginal LDN case had postoperative bleeding requiring immediate open surgery. All transvaginal LDN donors reported unaltered sexual function after surgery and satisfaction with the results. All recipients had immediate urine output, and all had a functioning graft at last follow-up except for one recipient of the transvaginal LDN group who required transplantectomy. Despite promising results, randomised controlled studies with longer follow-up are warranted to further elucidate the potential of this novel technique.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal NOTES-assisted LDN appears to be a feasible and reproducible surgical technique. The WIT was longer in the transvaginal group, and there was no effect on graft function after the short follow-up.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with transvaginal extraction of the kidney

Transvaginal recovery of the kidney has recently been reported, in a donor who had previously undergone a hysterectomy, as a less-invasive approach to perform laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Also, robotic-assisted laparoscopic kidney donation was suggested to enhance the surgeon's skills during renal dissection and to facilitate, in a different setting, the closure of the vaginal wall after a colpotomy. We report here the technique used for the first case of robotic-assisted laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy with transvaginal extraction of the graft in a patient with the uterus in place. The procedure was carried out by a multidisciplinary team, including a gynecologist. Total operative time was 215 min with a robotic time of 95 min. Warm ischemia time was 3 min and 15 s. The kidney was pre-entrapped in a bag and extracted transvaginally. There was no intra- or postoperative complication. No infection was seen in the donor or in the recipient. The donor did not require postoperative analgesia and was discharged from the hospital 24 h after surgery. Our initial experience with the combination of robotic surgery and transvaginal extraction of the donated kidney appears to open a new opportunity to further minimize the trauma to selected donors.