First report of successful treatment of multidrug-resistant cytomegalovirus disease with the novel anti-CMV compound AIC246

Emerging concepts of CMV in transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections continue to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality following solid organ transplantation and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Advances in understanding the biology of CMV in the immunosuppressed host will translate into improved management approaches and better clinical outcomes. Updated definitions of resistant and refractory CMV infections will lead to more consistent reporting of CMV outcomes, better inform appropriate antiviral strategies and influence clinical trial design. Improved knowledge of the immunological control of CMV in the immunosuppressed host has led to novel diagnostics, emerging therapeutic cellular therapies and the development of an informed rationale for prophylactic and pre-emptive strategies. As the boundaries of transplantation are extended, new patterns of CMV infection are being recognised. Finally, recent studies support the use of novel antiviral therapies in transplant recipients in the appropriate clinical setting. In this review, we provide an update on important new and emerging concepts in the management of CMV in immunosuppressed transplant recipients.

The emergence of letermovir and maribavir drug-resistant mutations: from clinical trials to real-world studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with severe clinical disease and high morbidity in immunocompromised hosts. Letermovir and maribavir, are two recently developed antiviral drugs used in the prevention and treatment of resistant and refractory CMV. Following the publication of landmark randomized trials and increased use, both clinical trial data and real-world experience has reported the development of antiviral drug resistance. The aim of this review was to comprehensively review the published literature on letermovir and maribavir drug resistance and to describe the clinical scenarios in which they may emerge.

RECENT FINDINGS

For letermovir, the most frequently detected resistance mutations occur in the UL56 gene (C325Y/W/F) and confer total resistance. Maribavir resistance mutations most often occur in the UL97 gene and resistance-associated variants (RAVs) T409M, H411Y, C480F have all been detected. The clinical context in which letermovir and maribavir resistance occurs include high viral loads at initiation, intensified immunosuppression, subtherapeutic drug exposure because of poor adherence, drug interactions, and inadequate central nervous system (CNS) penetration. Emergence of resistance mutations generally occurs within the first 3 months of initiation.

SUMMARY

The detection of letermovir and maribavir resistance mutations highlights an ongoing clinical challenge in the management of CMV.

Real-world experience with letermovir for cytomegalovirus-prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A multi-centre observational study

OBJECTIVES

Efficacy and safety of letermovir as prophylaxis for clinically significant cytomegalovirus infections (csCVMi) was evaluated in randomised controlled trials while most of the real-world studies are single-centre experiences.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multi-centre case-control study at six German university hospitals to evaluate clinical experiences in patients receiving CMV prophylaxis with letermovir (n = 200) compared to controls without CMV prophylaxis (n = 200) during a 48-week follow-up period after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT).

RESULTS

The incidence of csCMVi after aHCT was significantly reduced in the letermovir (34%, n = 68) compared to the control group (56%, n = 112; p < 0.001). Letermovir as CMV prophylaxis (OR 0.362) was found to be the only independent variable associated with the prevention of csCMVi. Patients receiving letermovir showed significantly better survival compared to the control group (HR = 1.735, 95% CI: 1.111-2.712; p = 0.014). Of all csCMVi, 46% (n = 31) occurred after discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis. Severe neutropenia (<500 neutrophils/µL) on the day of the stem cell infusion was the only independent variable for an increased risk of csCMVi after the end of letermovir prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the preventive effects of letermovir on csCMVi after aHCT. A substantial proportion of patients developed a csCMVi after discontinuation of letermovir. In particular, patients with severe neutropenia require specific attention after drug discontinuation.

Post-transplant malignancy: Focusing on virus-associated etiologies, pathogenesis, evidence-based management algorithms, present status of adoptive immunotherapy and future directions

Modern immunosuppression has led to a decrease in rejection rates and improved survival rates after solid organ transplantation. Increasing the potency of immunosuppression promotes post-transplant viral infections and associated cancers by impairing immune response against viruses and cancer immunoediting. This review reflects the magnitude, etiology and immunological characteristics of various virus-related post-transplant malignancies, emphasizing the need for future research. A multidisciplinary and strategic approach may serve best but overall literature evidence targeting it is sparse. However, the authors attempted to provide a more detailed update of the literature consensus for the prevention, diagnosis, management and surveillance of post-transplant viral infections and associated malignancies, with a focus on the current role of adoptive immunotherapy and the way forward. In order to achieve long-term patient and graft survival as well as superior post-transplant outcomes, collaborative research on holistic care of organ recipients is imperative.

Anti-CMV therapy, what next? A systematic review

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is one of the main causes of serious complications in immunocompromised patients and after congenital infection. There are currently drugs available to treat HCMV infection, targeting viral polymerase, whose use is complicated by toxicity and the emergence of resistance. Maribavir and letermovir are the latest antivirals to have been developed with other targets. The approval of letermovir represents an important innovation for CMV prevention in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, whereas maribavir allowed improving the management of refractory or resistant infections in transplant recipients. However, in case of multidrug resistance or for the prevention and treatment of congenital CMV infection, finding new antivirals or molecules able to inhibit CMV replication with the lowest toxicity remains a critical need. This review presents a range of molecules known to be effective against HCMV. Molecules with a direct action against HCMV include brincidofovir, cyclopropavir and anti-terminase benzimidazole analogs. Artemisinin derivatives, quercetin and baicalein, and anti-cyclooxygenase-2 are derived from natural molecules and are generally used for different indications. Although they have demonstrated indirect anti-CMV activity, few clinical studies were performed with these compounds. Immunomodulating molecules such as leflunomide and everolimus have also demonstrated indirect antiviral activity against HCMV and could be an interesting complement to antiviral therapy. The efficacy of anti-CMV immunoglobulins are discussed in CMV congenital infection and in association with direct antiviral therapy in heart transplanted patients. All molecules are described, with their mode of action against HCMV, preclinical tests, clinical studies and possible resistance. All these molecules have shown anti-HCMV potential as monotherapy or in combination with others. These new approaches could be interesting to validate in clinical trials.

Human cytomegalovirus in cancer: the mechanism of HCMV-induced carcinogenesis and its therapeutic potential

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a well-studied herpesvirus, has been implicated in malignancies derived from breast, colorectal muscle, brain, and other cancers. Intricate host-virus interactions are responsible for the cascade of events that have the potential to result in the transformed phenotype of normal cells. The HCMV genome contains oncogenes that may initiate these types of cancers, and although the primary HCMV infection is usually asymptomatic, the virus remains in the body in a latent or persistent form. Viral reactivation causes severe health issues in immune-compromised individuals, including cancer patients, organ transplants, and AIDS patients. This review focuses on the immunologic mechanisms and molecular mechanisms of HCMV-induced carcinogenesis, methods of HCMV treatment, and other studies. Studies show that HCMV DNA and virus-specific antibodies are present in many types of cancers, implicating HCMV as an important player in cancer progression. Importantly, many clinical trials have been initiated to exploit HCMV as a therapeutic target for the treatment of cancer, particularly in immunotherapy strategies in the treatment of breast cancer and glioblastoma patients. Taken together, these findings support a link between HCMV infections and cellular growth that develops into cancer. More importantly, HCMV is the leading cause of birth defects in newborns, and infection with HCMV is responsible for abortions in pregnant women.

Cytomegalovirus Therapy: Role of Letermovir in Prophylaxis and Treatment in Transplant Recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common viral pathogen in the transplant population and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CMV prevention is paramount; however, selecting the best preventive strategy depends on many factors including donor-recipient CMV serostatus, transplant-specific risks, antiviral toxicities and cost. Novel CMV therapeutics such as letermovir (LTV) are desperately needed to optimize CMV management. Uniquely among CMV antiviral therapies, LTV inhibits the viral terminase complex in the CMV DNA synthesis pathway and disrupts viral genome packaging. Further, it lacks side effects frequently associated with other CMV antiviral therapies and evades common mechanisms of resistance. LTV is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for CMV prevention in adult CMV-seropositive hematopoietic cell transplant recipients but is increasingly applied off-label for prophylaxis and treatment. This review summarizes important concepts of CMV management in transplantation, with a specific focus on LTV pharmacology and clinical experience to date alongside future prospects for its application.

Letermovir and maribavir for pan-resistant cytomegalovirus infection in a patient with haematologic malignancy: Consideration for combination therapy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Management of pan-resistant cytomegalovirus infection (CMVi) requires a multifaceted approach, including host defence optimization by reducing immunosuppression, and standard or experimental antiviral therapy.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 36-year-old man with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma, who underwent allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHCT) with resultant graft-versus-host disease treated with immunosuppressive therapy, developed pan-resistant CMVi. He was successfully treated with combination therapy of maribavir and letermovir.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Combination therapy, used for other infections to prevent cross-resistant, may apply for CMVi.

The Effect of Oral Letermovir Administration on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Oral Dose of P-Glycoprotein Substrate Digoxin in Healthy Volunteers

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase inhibitor approved in the United States, Canada, Japan, and the European Union for prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in CMV-seropositive, allogeneic, hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. In vitro, letermovir is a substrate and potential modulator of P-glycoprotein. The potential of letermovir to alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin (a P-glycoprotein substrate) upon coadministration in healthy subjects was therefore investigated in a phase 1 trial (EudraCT: 2011-004516-39). Oral letermovir 240 mg was administered twice daily for 12 days with a single oral digoxin 0.5-mg dose on day 7; after a washout period, oral digoxin 0.5 mg was administered on day 35 (sequence 1). The period order was reversed after a 28-day washout for sequence 2. Pharmacokinetics and safety were evaluated. The presence of steady-state letermovir reduced digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve from administration until last quantifiable measurement by 12% and maximum plasma concentration by 22% compared with digoxin alone; digoxin half-life and elimination rate remained similar in both conditions. The between-subject variability of digoxin maximum plasma concentration was higher with letermovir than without (42% vs 31%) and similar for digoxin area under the plasma concentration-time curve in both periods. No specific safety or tolerability concerns were identified. Overall, letermovir had no clinically relevant effect on concomitant administration with digoxin.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Letermovir and Midazolam Coadministration in Healthy Subjects

Letermovir is a human cytomegalovirus (CMV) terminase inhibitor for the prophylaxis of CMV infection and disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients. In vitro studies have identified letermovir as a potential cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor. Thus, the effect of letermovir on the CYP3A isoenzyme-specific probe drug midazolam was investigated in a phase 1 trial. Healthy female subjects received single-dose intravenous (IV; 1 mg) and oral (2 mg) midazolam on days -4 and -2, respectively. Letermovir 240 mg once daily was administered on days 1 to 6, and further single doses of midazolam 1 mg IV and oral midazolam 2 mg were administered on days 4 and 6, respectively. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety were monitored throughout the trial. Following coadministration with letermovir, the least square means ratio for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration was 172.4% and 225.3%, respectively, for oral midazolam, and 105.2% and 146.6%, respectively, for midazolam IV. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration ratio of midazolam to 1-hydroxymidazolam increased slightly in the presence of letermovir following IV (8.8-13.1; 49% increase) and oral (3.3-5.3; 59% increase) midazolam. Letermovir reached steady state, on average, by days 5 to 6. All treatments were generally well tolerated. Letermovir demonstrated moderate CYP3A inhibition.

Letermovir in lung transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection: A retrospective observational study

Letermovir is a new antiviral drug approved for the prophylaxis of CMV infection in allogeneic stem cell transplants. The aim of the study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of letermovir in difficult to treat CMV infections in lung transplant recipients. All lung transplant recipients between March 2018 and August 2020, who have been treated with letermovir for ganciclovir-resistant or refractory CMV infection were included in the study and analysed retrospectively. In total, 28 patients were identified. CMV disease was present in 15 patients (53.6%). In 23 patients (82.1%), rapid response was noticed, and CMV-viral load could be significantly decreased (>1 log₁₀ ) after a median of 17 [14-27] days and cleared subsequently in all of these patients. Five patients (17.9%) were classified as non-responder. Thereof, development of a mutation of the CMV UL56 terminase (UL-56-Gen: C325Y) conferring letermovir resistance could be observed in three patients (60%). Common side effects were mild and mostly of gastrointestinal nature. Mild adjustments of the immunosuppressive drugs were mandatory upon treatment initiation with letermovir. In addition to other interventions, letermovir was effective in difficult to treat CMV infections in lung transplant recipients. However, in patients with treatment failure mutation conferring letermovir, resistance should be taken into account.

Myxobacteria as a Source of New Bioactive Compounds: A Perspective Study

Myxobacteria are unicellular, Gram-negative, soil-dwelling, gliding bacteria that belong to class δ-proteobacteria and order Myxococcales. They grow and proliferate by transverse fission under normal conditions, but form fruiting bodies which contain myxospores during unfavorable conditions. In view of the escalating problem of antibiotic resistance among disease-causing pathogens, it becomes mandatory to search for new antibiotics effective against such pathogens from natural sources. Among the different approaches, Myxobacteria, having a rich armor of secondary metabolites, preferably derivatives of polyketide synthases (PKSs) along with non-ribosomal peptide synthases (NRPSs) and their hybrids, are currently being explored as producers of new antibiotics. The Myxobacterial species are functionally characterized to assess their ability to produce antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, antimalarial, immunosuppressive, cytotoxic and antioxidative bioactive compounds. In our study, we have found their compounds to be effective against a wide range of pathogens associated with the concurrence of different infectious diseases.

The addition of adjunctive letermovir to valganciclovir for refractory cytomegalovirus viremia in kidney transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Persistent viral replication resulting in ongoing cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia despite adequate therapy is difficult to manage and associated with negative outcomes. We report a case series of kidney transplant recipients receiving adjunctive letermovir in combination with valganciclovir for refractory CMV.

METHODS

Adult patients receiving a kidney or kidney-pancreas transplant were included if they developed CMV viremia and initiated letermovir 480 mg daily as part of a dual therapy regimen with valganciclovir 900 mg twice daily between 1/9/2020 and 31/12/2020. Included patients received ≥90 days of valganciclovir and had a detectable viral load less than 1000 Iu/ml (log10  < 3) at the time of letermovir initiation. The primary objective was to evaluate the impact of adjunctive letermovir on viral clearance to negativity. We also evaluated effect of letermovir on tacrolimus levels.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included. Letermovir was added 223 ± 105 days after initiation of CMV treatment with ganciclovir derivatives. Median viral load at initiation was 139.7 (range: 73-355) IU/ml and did not clear or change significantly after 2, 4 and 12 weeks of adjunctive letermovir (132.5 [range: 34.5-513] IU/ml vs. 68.7 [range: 34.5-574] IU/ml vs. 78.3 [range: 34.5-347] IU/ml, p > 0.05). Tacrolimus was reduced by ∼30% in anticipation of a letermovir-tacrolimus drug interaction. Despite this reduction, mean tacrolimus serum levels two weeks after adjunctive letermovir increased by 43% (5.6 ± 1.6 ng/ml vs 8.0 ± 4.6 ng/ml).

CONCLUSION

In kidney and kidney-pancreas recipients with refractory CMV, the use of adjunctive letermovir did not result in viral clearance. Additionally, despite a mean tacrolimus dose reduction of 30% at letermovir initiation, serum concentrations increased by over 40%. Further investigation into the optimal approach to refractory CMV is needed.

Letermovir treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Few options are available for cytomegalovirus (CMV) treatment in transplant recipients resistant, refractory, or intolerant to approved agents. Letermovir (LET) is approved for prophylaxis in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients, but little is known about efficacy in CMV infection. We conducted an observational study to determine the patterns of use and outcome of LET treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients who received LET for treatment of CMV infection were identified at 13 transplant centers. Demographic and outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven solid organ and 21 HCT recipients (one dual) from 13 medical centers were included. Forty-five of 47 (94%) were treated with other agents prior to LET, and 57% had a history of prior CMV disease. Seventy-seven percent were intolerant to other antivirals; 32% were started on LET because of resistance concerns. Among 37 patients with viral load < 1000 international units (IU)/ml at LET initiation, two experienced >1 log rise in viral load by week 12, and no deaths were attributed to CMV. Ten patients had viral load > 1000 IU/ml at LET initiation, and six of 10 (60%) had a CMV viral load < 1000 IU/ml at completion of therapy or last known value. LET was discontinued in two patients for an adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with LET with viral load < 1000 IU/ml had good virologic outcomes. Outcomes were mixed when LET was initiated at higher viral loads. Further studies on combination therapy or alternative LET dosing are needed.

Use of Letermovir-Valganciclovir combination as a step-down treatment after Foscarnet for Ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients

Background

Letermovir (LTV) might be an alternative treatment to nephrotoxic foscarnet (FOS) in Ganciclovir (GCV) resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, its efficacy in controlling active CMV viremia is unclear, as it is only approved for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem‐cell transplantation.

Methods

This case series describes 14 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with moderate‐level GCV resistant CMV infection, treated by different step‐down strategies after initial FOS therapy: (1) Observation without antiviral follow‐up or switch to valganciclovir (VGCV) (pre‐LTV era), and (2) Switch to LTV±VGCV (LTV era).

Results

One patient died under FOS. Thirteen patients were followed under step‐down regimens. All but two patients had ongoing CMV viremia when stopping FOS. In pre‐LTV era, 5/9 (56%) experienced a CMV breakthrough > 10 000 IU/ml calling for another course of FOS, as compared to 1/4 (25%) in the LTV era. Addition of VGCV to LTV at low‐level viral breakthrough, addressing a possible developing resistance against LTV, prevented viral surge in two patients. In the pre‐LTV era, CMV‐related death or graft loss occurred in three of nine (33%), compared to no death or graft loss in the LTV era.

Conclusion

A step‐down strategy combining LTV+VGCV, might allow to safely stop FOS at ongoing low‐level viremia.

Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Patients with Valganciclovir-Induced Leukopenia

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with valganciclovir is the standard of practice in most transplant centers, but treatment-related leukopenia can limit valganciclovir’s use. Therefore, we evaluated letermovir, a novel antiviral agent recently approved for use in hematopoietic cell transplant patients as CMV prophylaxis, in lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate valganciclovir due to severe leukopenia. We performed a retrospective analysis of all lung transplant patients at our center who received letermovir for CMV prophylaxis between 1 December 2018 and 1 January 2020. A repeated measures mixed model was used to analyze white blood cell (WBC) trends, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze secondary endpoints, including CMV DNAemia, renal function, immunosuppression dosing, and allograft function. Seventeen patients were administered letermovir during the study period due to valganciclovir-induced leukopenia (median WBC nadir 1.1 K/uL, range <0.30–2.19 K/uL). Median WBC improvement was noted in 15 (88.2%) patients after starting letermovir. Breakthrough CMV DNAemia necessitating treatment occurred in two patients, with one of the two cases being due to patient noncompliance. CMV resistance to letermovir was detected in two patients, necessitating a change to an alternative agent in one of these patients. No major side effects were reported in any patient. Letermovir is a generally safe and effective alternative for CMV prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate valganciclovir due to leukopenia.

New advances in the management of cytomegalovirus in allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viraemia continues to be a frequent complication in the post-haemopoietic stem cell transplantation period despite a low incidence of CMV end-organ disease. Several significant advances in the understanding and management of CMV infection have occurred in the last few years including improved diagnostics, monitoring of CMV immunity, availability of novel anti-CMV drugs, and emerging use of immunotherapies including CMV-specific T-cell infusions. In addition to reviewing these advances we also explore some of the more practical prescribing issues of the older and newer CMV drugs including cost, toxicity and drug interactions to help clinicians navigate this new era of CMV management.

Association of CMV-specific T-cell immunity and risk of CMV infection in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Protecting against CMV infection and maintaining CMV in latent state are largely provided by CMV-specific T-cells in lung transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess whether a specific T-cell response is associated with the risk for CMV infection in seronegative patients who are at high risk for delayed CMV infection.

METHODS

All CMV-seronegative recipients (R-) from CMV-seropositive donors (D+) between January 2018 and April 2019 were included and retrospectively screened for CMV infection before and after assessment of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of the 50 patients (62%) developed early-onset CMV infection. Lower absolute neutrophil counts were significantly associated with early-onset CMV infection. Antiviral prophylaxis was ceased after 137.2 ± 42.8 days. CMV-CMI were measured at a median of 5.5 months after LTx. 19 patients experienced early and late-onset CMV infection after prophylaxis withdrawal within 15 months post transplantation. Positive CMV-CMI was significantly associated with lower risk of late-onset CMV infection after transplantation in logistic and cox-regression analysis (OR=0.05, p = .01; OR=2,369, p = .026).

CONCLUSION

D+/R- lung transplant recipients are at high risk of developing early and late-onset CMV infection. Measurement of CMV-CMI soon after transplantation might further define the CMV infection prediction risk in LTx recipients being at high risk for CMV viremia.

Off-Label Use of Letermovir as Preemptive Anti-Cytomegalovirus Therapy in a Pediatric Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant

Despite the effectiveness of the currently available antiviral drugs in treating cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, high rates of adverse effects are associated with their use. Moreover, a problem of increasing importance is the emergence of drug-resistant CMV infection. Here, we describe the first case of off-label use of letermovir (LMV) as preemptive antiviral therapy, in a pediatric allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant recipient with ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection who was intolerant to foscarnet and unable to achieve viral clearance after seven doses of cidofovir. After the administration of LMV, a gradual reduction in viral load was observed and within 6 weeks of LMV treatment, after more than 6 months of positive CMV-DNAemia, the patient cleared the infection. No adverse effects associated with LMV were observed during treatment. In this pediatric study case, the off-label use of LMV for the treatment of CMV infection has been well tolerated and proved to be effective in leading to the suppression of viral replication.

Resistance to a Nucleoside Analog Antiviral Drug from More Rapid Extension of Drug-Containing Primers

Nucleoside analogs are mainstays of antiviral therapy. Although resistance to these drugs hinders their use, understanding resistance can illuminate mechanisms of the drugs and their targets. Certain nucleoside analogs, such as ganciclovir (GCV), a leading therapy for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), contain the equivalent of a 3'-hydoxyl moiety, yet their triphosphates can terminate genome synthesis (nonobligate chain termination). For ganciclovir, chain termination is delayed until incorporation of the subsequent nucleotide, after which viral polymerase idling (repeated addition and removal of incorporated nucleotides) prevents extension. Here, we investigated how an alanine-to-glycine substitution at residue 987 (A987G), in conserved motif V in the thumb subdomain of the catalytic subunit (Pol) of HCMV DNA polymerase, affects polymerase function to overcome delayed chain termination and confer ganciclovir resistance. Steady-state enzyme kinetic studies revealed no effects of this substitution on incorporation of ganciclovir-triphosphate into DNA that could explain resistance. We also found no effects of the substitution on Pol's exonuclease activity, and the mutant enzyme still exhibited idling after incorporation of GCV and the subsequent nucleotide. However, despite extending normal DNA primers similarly to wild-type enzyme, A987G Pol more rapidly extended ganciclovir-containing DNA primers, thereby overcoming chain termination. The mutant Pol also more rapidly extended RNA primers, a previously unreported activity for HCMV Pol. Structural analysis of related Pols bound to primer-templates provides a rationale for these results. These studies uncover a new drug resistance mechanism, potentially applicable to other nonobligate chain-terminating nucleoside analogs, and shed light on polymerase functions.IMPORTANCE While resistance to antiviral drugs can hinder their clinical use, understanding resistance mechanisms can illuminate how these drugs and their targets act. We studied a substitution in the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) DNA polymerase that confers resistance to a leading anti-HCMV drug, ganciclovir. Ganciclovir is a nucleoside analog that terminates DNA replication after its triphosphate and the subsequent nucleotide are incorporated. We found that the substitution studied here results in an increased rate of extension of drug-containing DNA primers, thereby overcoming termination, which is a new mechanism of drug resistance. The substitution also induces more rapid extension of RNA primers, a function that had not previously been reported for HCMV polymerase. Thus, these results provide a novel resistance mechanism with potential implications for related nucleoside analogs that act against established and emerging viruses, and shed light on DNA polymerase functions.

Letermovir for the compassionate therapeutic use of cytomegalovirus infection

PURPOSE

Data on the efficacy, dosing and safety of letermovir for the compassionate therapeutic use of CMV infections are limited.

METHODS

Clinical and virological efficacy of letermovir was assessed in a retrospective single-centre study of patients who received letermovir for the compassionate therapeutic use of CMV infections.

RESULTS

Letermovir initiation yielded prompt treatment response in 7 out of 9 patients (77.7%).

CONCLUSION

Letermovir may be an effective and well tolerated option in the compassionate treatment of CMV infections, although recurrence of CMV and emergence of resistance may be issues.

Advances in the Development of Therapeutics for Cytomegalovirus Infections

The development of therapeutics for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, while progressing, has not matched the pace of new treatments of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections; nevertheless, recent developments in the treatment of CMV infections have resulted in improved human health and perhaps will encourage the development of new therapeutic approaches. First, the deployment of ganciclovir and valganciclovir for both the prevention and treatment of CMV infections and disease in transplant recipients has been further improved with the licensure of the efficacious and less toxic letermovir. Regardless, late-onset CMV disease, specifically pneumonia, remains problematic. Second, the treatment of congenital CMV infections with valganciclovir has beneficially improved both hearing and neurologic outcomes, both fundamental advances for these children. In these pediatric studies, viral load was decreased but not eliminated. Thus, an important lesson learned from studies in both populations is the need for new antiviral agents and the necessity for combination therapies as has been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of HIV infections, among others. The development of monoclonal antibodies, sirtuins, and cyclopropovir may provide new treatment options.

Antiviral Drugs Against Herpesviruses

The discovery of the nucleoside analogue, acyclovir, represented a milestone in the management of infections caused by herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus. Ganciclovir, another nucleoside analogue, was then used for the management of systemic and organ-specific human cytomegalovirus diseases. The pyrophosphate analogue, foscarnet, and the nucleotide analogue, cidofovir, have been approved subsequently and constitute the second-line antiviral drugs. However, the viral DNA polymerase is the ultimate target of all these antiviral agents with a possible emergence of cross-resistance between these drugs. Recently, letermovir that targets the viral terminase complex was approved for the prophylaxis of human cytomegalovirus infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Other viral targets such as the protein kinase and the helicase-primase complex are also evaluated for the development of novel potent inhibitors against herpesviruses.

Single-center experience with use of letermovir for treatment of CMV infection in stem cell transplant recipients

The approval of letermovir provided a new option for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in CMV seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Data are limited on the use of letermovir for the treatment of CMV infection. We performed a single-center retrospective review of allo-HSCT recipients who received letermovir off-label for treatment of CMV infection (CMV DNAemia and CMV disease) from November 2017 until November 2019. Fifteen patients were included, 14 of which received letermovir for treatment of CMV DNAemia. The median duration from transplant to CMV DNAemia was 41 days and median duration of letermovir therapy was 53 days (IQR, 43-59). Median time to first undetectable CMV viral load from the start of letermovir was 16 days (IQR, 13-21). No significant correlation was noted between the time to CMV DNA clearance and either CMV DNA at the time of starting letermovir (r = -.12, 95% CI: -0.63-0.46; P = .69) or CMV DNA peak (r = .04, 95% CI: -0.51-0.58, P = .87). Three patients had late reactivation of CMV after completion of letermovir (20%) after 87 days (IQR, 68-103) of therapy cessation. Clinical failure or treatment intolerance occurred in two patients (14%). One patient failed to achieve an undetectable viral load. In another patient, letermovir was discontinued due to documented therapy-related thrombocytopenia. Our analysis suggests that letermovir might have a potential role for the treatment of CMV infection in select patients with contraindication or intolerance to more validated therapies.

Resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infections after hematopoietic cell transplantation: diagnosis and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Refractory or resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections are challenging complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Most refractory or resistant CMV infections are associated with poor outcomes and increased mortality. Prompt recognition of resistant or refractory CMV infections, understanding the resistance pathways, and the treatment options in HCT recipients are imperative.

RECENT FINDINGS

New definitions for refractory and resistant CMV infections in HCT recipients have been introduced for future clinical trials. Interestingly, refractory CMV infections are more commonly encountered in HCT recipients when compared with resistant CMV infections. CMV terminase complex mutations in UL56, UL89, and UL51 could be associated with letermovir resistance; specific mutations in UL56 are the most commonly encountered in clinical practice. Finally, brincidofovir, maribavir, letermovir, and CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell therapy expanded our treatment options for refractory or resistant CMV infections.

SUMMARY

Many advances have been made to optimize future clinical trials for management of refractory or resistant CMV infections, and to better understand new resistance mechanisms to novel drugs. New drugs or strategies with limited toxicities are needed to improve outcomes of difficult to treat CMV infections in HCT recipients.

Letermovir and its role in the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in seropositive patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is one of the most common infections affecting allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Although available anti-CMV therapies have been evaluated for the prevention of CMV reactivation, their toxicity profile makes them unfavorable for use as primary prophylaxis; thus, they are routinely reserved for the treatment of CMV viremia or CMV end-organ disease. Pre-emptive CMV monitoring strategies have been widely accepted, and although they have been helpful in early detection, they have not affected the overall morbidity and mortality associated with CMV. Letermovir is a novel agent that was approved for primary prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adult allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. This review focuses on letermovir's novel mechanism; clinical trials supporting its United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and subsequent follow-up analyses; clinical considerations, with an emphasis on pharmacology; and lessons learned from solid organ transplant recipients, as well as potential future directions.

New treatments for cytomegalovirus in transplant patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to highlight novel advances in prophylaxis against and treatment of CMV in kidney transplant recipients. Current options include intravenous ganciclovir and oral valganciclovir, but use of these agents is limited by side effects, such as myelosuppression as well as evolving resistance in CMV strains.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in the field include novel drugs that have shown promise in preliminary studies and are now being tested in large-scale clinical trials. Moreover, there is a developing focus in enhancing host immune responses to better protect against viral infection using anti-CMV vaccines. Studying host immune responses to CMV has also led to improved monitoring strategies, such as the QuantiFERON assay, which will allow for improved risk stratification and targeted therapies in transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

In summary, although options for prophylaxis and treatment against CMV have been somewhat limited to date, a number of new strategies are currently under development with several drugs in phase 3 trials. Therefore, the landscape of CMV management in kidney transplant recipients will be changing significantly in the coming years with the ultimate goal of safer and more effective therapies to combat CMV.

Make Sure You Have a Safety Net: Updates in the Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications in Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients are at increased risk of infection and immune dysregulation due to reception of cytotoxic chemotherapy; development of graft versus host disease, which necessitates treatment with immunosuppressive medications; and placement of invasive catheters. The prevention and management of infections in these vulnerable hosts is of utmost importance and a key “safety net” in stem cell transplantation. In this review, we provide updates on the prevention and management of CMV infection; invasive fungal infections; bacterial infections; Clostridium difficile infection; and EBV, HHV-6, adenovirus and BK infections. We discuss novel drugs, such as letermovir, isavuconazole, meropenem-vaborbactam and bezlotoxumab; weigh the pros and cons of using fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during neutropenia after stem cell transplantation; and provide updates on important viral infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Optimizing the prevention and management of infectious diseases by using the best available evidence will contribute to better outcomes for stem cell transplant recipients, and provide the best possible “safety net” for these immunocompromised hosts.

Compassionate Use of Letermovir in a 2-Year-Old Immunocompromised Child With Resistant Cytomegalovirus Disease

Little information on the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of letermovir among immunocompromised children is currently available. We describe here the use of letermovir in a 2-year-old immunocompromised child with ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Detailed information on therapeutic-drug-monitoring measures and dosage adjustments for letermovir is provided.

Letermovir as Salvage Therapy for Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Letermovir, a new viral terminase complex inhibitor, has been approved for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. However, data on the efficacy and safety of letermovir for the treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients remain scarce.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of stem cell and organ transplant recipients who received letermovir for the treatment of CMV infection from November 2017 to October 2018.

RESULTS

Six patients were included, and 5 were evaluable. All received letermovir in the context of a refractory or resistant CMV infection including asymptomatic CMV viremia (n = 3), CMV syndrome (n = 1), and CMV pneumonitis and colitis (n = 1). The 3 asymptomatic patients experienced a decrease of the viral load (VL) to <200 IU/mL after letermovir therapy. One patient displayed a partial VL response (2-log of VL reduction) but a good clinical response, and one who received a suboptimal dose of letermovir experienced an increase of viremia. There were no treatment-related adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate mixed efficacy in patients with refractory CMV infection suggesting that letermovir may be a useful therapeutic adjunct, potentially in combination with other antivirals.

Management of Antimicrobial Agents in Abdominal Organ Transplant Patients in Intensive Care Unit

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early diagnosis of infections and immediate initiation of appropriate antimicrobials are crucial in the management of patients before and after organ transplantation. We reviewed the most recent literature and guidelines in this field and organized the current recommendations for healthcare professionals caring for critically ill organ transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of multidrug-resistant organisms is increasing. Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria comprise about 14% of organisms. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections are also on the rise, as 20.5% of nosocomial enterococci are now vancomycin-resistant, changing empiric antibiotic selection. Fluconazole-resistant Candida species comprise up to 46% of cases of candidemia in hospitalized patients. Consequently, new guidelines recommend primary use of echinocandins in patients with candidemia who have moderate-to-severe disease. Finally, the incidence of emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection in patients is 5-12%, requiring early recognition and change to alternative regimens in the case of poor response to therapy.

SUMMARY

Bloodstream infections are a major cause of mortality and morbidity in solid organ transplantation. Mortality as high as 24% and 50% have been reported with sepsis and septic shock respectively. As such, bloodstream infections should be diagnosed rapidly and intravenous antibiotics should be started immediately. Appropriate resuscitation should be initiated and the number and/or dose of immunosuppressive drugs should be reduced. Proper source control must also be achieved with radiologic drainage or surgical intervention as appropriate. Initial antibiotic treatment of these patients should cover both Gram-positive organisms, especially in the presence of intravascular catheters, and Gram-negative bacteria. Echinocandins like caspofungin should also be considered especially in critically ill patients, particularly if a patient has been on total parenteral nutrition or broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Synthesis, Anti-Varicella-Zoster Virus and Anti-Cytomegalovirus Activity of 4,5-Disubstituted 1,2,3-(1H)-Triazoles

BACKGROUND

Clinical drugs for herpesvirus exhibit high toxicity and suffer from significant drug resistance. The development of new, effective, and safe anti-herpesvirus agents with different mechanisms of action is greatly required.

OBJECTIVE

Novel inhibitors against herpesvirus with different mechanisms of action from that of clinical drugs.

METHODS

A series of novel 5-(benzylamino)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamides were efficiently synthesized and EC50 values against Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) and Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) were evaluated in vitro.

RESULTS

Some compounds present antiviral activity. Compounds 5s and 5t are potent against both HCMV and VZV. Compounds 5m, 5n, 5s, and 5t show similar EC50 values against both TK+ and TK- VZV strains.

CONCLUSION

5-(Benzylamino)-1H-1, 2,3-triazole-4-carboxamides are active against herpesviruses and their activity is remarkably affected by the nature and the position of substituents in the benzene ring. The results indicate that these derivatives are independent of the viral thymidine kinase (TK) for activation, which is indispensable for current drugs. Their mechanisms of action may differ from those of the clinic anti-herpesvirus drugs.

CMV Prevention and Treatment in Transplantation: What's New in 2019

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transplant recipients are at risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and associated morbidity and mortality. We summarize recently introduced or currently investigated modalities for prevention and treatment of CMV infection in hematopoietic cell (HCT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Letermovir was recently approved for CMV prevention in HCT recipients. Data from real world studies support its role to improve outcomes in this population. Letermovir is currently under investigation for broader patient populations and indications. Maribavir is in late stages of development for CMV treatment and may provide a safer alternative to currently available anti-CMV drugs. Promising CMV vaccine candidates and adoptive cell therapy approaches are under evaluation. CMV immune monitoring assays are predicted to play a more central role in our clinical decision making. In recent years, major advances have been made in CMV prevention and treatment in transplant recipients. Rigorous research is ongoing and is anticipated to further impact our ability to improve outcomes in this population.

Letermovir for the Management of Cytomegalovirus-associated Uveitis

Purpose: To investigate the use of letermovir 480 mg daily for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-associated uveitis (AU).Methods: Retrospective case series of CMV-AU patients on letermovir.Results: Six eyes of five patients (mean age 54 years) were included. Mean follow-up time was 10 months. Four patients had CMV anterior uveitis and one patient had bilateral CMV retinitis. All were treated initially with valganciclovir 900 mg twice daily. Transition to letermovir was due to cytopenias (n = 3), transaminitis (n = 1), and persistent inflammation on valganciclovir (n = 1). At the initiation of letermovir, mean visual acuity (VA) was 0.35 logMAR and IOP was 14 mmHg. One of the six eyes had a recurrence of anterior uveitis due to self-discontinuation of letermovir. No adverse events were observed. At last follow-up, no patients had active inflammation. Mean VA was 0.08 logMAR and IOP was 9 mmHg.Conclusion: Letermovir may be an alternative treatment for CMV-AU in patients with persistent inflammation or side effects on valganciclovir.

Infectious Complications Following Kidney Transplantation-A Focus on Hepatitis C Infection, Cytomegalovirus Infection and Novel Developments in the Gut Microbiota

The incidence of infectious complications, compared with the general population and the pre-transplant status of the recipient, increases substantially following kidney transplantation, causing significant morbidity and mortality. The potent immunosuppressive therapy given to prevent graft rejection in kidney transplant recipients results in an increased susceptibility to a wide range of opportunistic infections including bacterial, viral and fungal infections. Over the last five years, several advances have occurred that may have changed the burden of infectious complications in kidney transplant recipients. Due to the availability of direct-acting antivirals to manage donor-derived hepatitis C infection, this has opened the way for donors with hepatitis C infection to be considered in the donation process. In addition, there have been the development of medications targeting the growing burden of resistant cytomegalovirus, as well as the discovery of the potentially important role of the gastrointestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of post-transplant infection. In this narrative review, we will discuss these three advances and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Single-center experience with use of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis or treatment in thoracic organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in thoracic organ transplant recipients. Valganciclovir and ganciclovir are used for both prophylaxis and treatment of this infection, but intolerance and treatment failure are common. Letermovir has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of CMV infection when used for prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, there are no data on its efficacy in thoracic organ transplantation.

METHODS

We examined the use of letermovir for either CMV prophylaxis (primary and secondary) or treatment in heart and lung transplant recipients at our institution from February 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

Nine total patients received letermovir at our institution (8 lung transplant, 1 heart transplant) during the study period. Letermovir was prescribed for CMV prophylaxis in eight patients (primary prophylaxis in two patients and secondary prophylaxis in 6 patients), and for treatment of CMV DNAemia in two cases. One patient received letermovir for both secondary prophylaxis and treatment on separate occasions. Three out of 8 (37.5%) patients receiving letermovir for prophylaxis developed CMV DNAemia during prophylaxis. One patient treated for CMV disease had clinical failure with a sharp rise in serum CMV DNA PCR. The other patient treated for low-grade CMV DNAemia initially had a slight rise in CMV DNA PCR, but has since had a sustained response. No major side effects were experienced, and 2 patients reported minor side effects.

CONCLUSION

Letermovir was well tolerated with only minor side effects reported; however, the rate of development of CMV DNAemia on prophylaxis was considerable. Further study of the dosing and efficacy of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis or treatment in thoracic organ transplant recipients is warranted.

Safety considerations with current and emerging antiviral therapies for cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality, and its management is essential for the successful outcome of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Areas covered: This review discusses the safety profiles of currently available and emerging antiviral drugs and the other strategies for HCMV prevention and treatment after transplantation. Expert opinion: Strategies for management of HCMV rely largely on the use of antiviral agents that inhibit viral DNA polymerase (ganciclovir/valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir/brincidofovir) and viral terminase complex (letermovir), with different types and degrees of adverse effects. An investigational agent, maribavir, exerts its anti-CMV effect through UL97 inhibition, and its safety profile is under clinical evaluation. In choosing the antiviral medication to use, it is important to consider these safety profiles in addition to overall efficacy. In addition to antiviral drugs, reduction of immunosuppression is often generally needed in the management of HCMV infection, but with a potential risk of allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. The use of HCMV-specific or non-specific intravenous immunoglobulins remains debated, while adoptive HCMV-specific T cell therapy remains investigational, and associated with unique set of adverse effects.

An overview of letermovir: a cytomegalovirus prophylactic option

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) or human herpesvirus 5 (HHV-5) is a β-herpesvirus that causes widespread infection in nearly all members of the human population worldwide. Its persistence in humans after primary infection in a latent phase as well as a partial non-protective immune response is the basis for repeated re-activation/re-infection episodes occurring both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised subjects. In the latter patient populations, which include hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, HCMV reactivation episodes may be particularly severe, leading to both systemic and end-organ diseases. Since the 90s, at least four antiviral drugs targeting the DNA polymerase complex have been developed for the prevention and treatment of HCMV infections in transplant recipients, used as first-line (ganciclovir and valganciclovir) and second-line therapy (foscarnet and cidofovir). However, due to their toxicity and drug-resistance induction, new drugs with different targets were needed. Areas covered: In 2017, a new drug named letermovir (LTV), which targets the HCMV DNA terminase complex, was licensed for prophylaxis of HCMV infections in HSCT recipients. This is the focus of this review. Expert opinion: LTV safety and efficacy are promising. However, long-term adverse events and the emergence of drug-resistant HCMV strains must be investigated in extended clinical trials prior to drawing final conclusions.

Role of letermovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common opportunistic infection after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). CMV surveillance-preemptive therapy is the current preferred approach for preventing CMV disease after HSCT. In contrast, antiviral prophylaxis is not commonly used due to myelosuppressive effects of valganciclovir. In this article, the role of the newly approved antiviral compound, letermovir, is reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Letermovir inhibits CMV by interfering viral terminase complex. In a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled clinical study that enrolled 495 CMV-seropositive HSCT recipients, the primary end point of clinically significant CMV infection was significantly reduced by letermovir prophylaxis. Letermovir was well tolerated without risk of myelotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Experimental in-vitro data suggest that letermovir may possess low genetic barrier to resistance. In prophylaxis trials, two breakthrough infections were reported due to selection of CMV UL56 V236M mutation.

SUMMARY

Letermovir is an important addition to the current strategies for CMV prevention after allogeneic HSCT. Its favourable efficacy and safety profile re-opens door for antiviral prophylaxis another first-line option, similar to CMV surveillance-preemptive therapy, for preventing CMV in allogeneic HSCT recipients.

Letermovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients: an evidence-based review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading opportunistic infection in immune compromised patients, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, where primary infection or reactivation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral drugs are the mainstay for the prevention of CMV infection and disease, most commonly with valganciclovir. However, valganciclovir use is often associated with adverse drug reactions, most notably leukopenia and neutropenia, and its widespread use has led to emergence of antiviral resistance. Foscarnet and cidofovir, however, are associated with nephrotoxicity. Letermovir, a novel CMV viral terminase inhibitor drug, was recently approved for CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT recipients. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence supporting the use of letermovir in allogeneic HSCT recipients, and how the drug impacts our contemporary clinical practice. In addition, we discuss the ongoing clinical trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV in SOT recipients. The use of letermovir for treatment of CMV infection and disease is not yet approved. However, because of a unique mechanism of activity, we provide our perspective on the potential role of letermovir in the treatment of ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and disease. Furthermore, drug-resistant CMV has emerged during use of letermovir for prophylaxis and treatment. Caution is advised on its use in order to preserve its therapeutic lifespan.

From academic research to founding a company: the story of AiCuris

This contribution describes the experiences with three careers: leading and building an academic research institute, heading a research area in a multinational pharma company and founding and leading a biotech company, which saw its first drug successfully enter the market in its 11thyear of existence. The three positions had very different challenges, the common denominator for success was good and innovative science. However, research in a commercial environment, in addition to scientific excellence, also means to demonstrate the likely commercial success of the particular research. The most challenging, but at the same time the most interesting mission was the foundation of a new company, securing the financial means and developing the drugs, which had been discovered, in the clinics.

Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence-based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.

Use of Letermovir as Salvage Therapy for Drug-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Retinitis

Treatment options for drug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) are limited. Letermovir is a novel antiviral recently approved for CMV prophylaxis following hematopoietic cell transplantation, but its efficacy in other settings is unknown. We recently used letermovir for salvage treatment in four solid organ transplant recipients with ganciclovir-resistant CMV retinitis. All patients improved clinically without known adverse drug events. However, three patients failed to maintain virologic suppression, including two patients who developed genotypically confirmed resistance to letermovir while on therapy.

The Third International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-organ Transplantation

Despite recent advances, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications affecting solid organ transplant recipients, conveying higher risks of complications, graft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Research in the field and development of prior consensus guidelines supported by The Transplantation Society has allowed a more standardized approach to CMV management. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened to expand and revise evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including prevention, treatment, diagnostics, immunology, drug resistance, and pediatric issues. Highlights include advances in molecular and immunologic diagnostics, improved understanding of diagnostic thresholds, optimized methods of prevention, advances in the use of novel antiviral therapies and certain immunosuppressive agents, and more savvy approaches to treatment resistant/refractory disease. The following report summarizes the updated recommendations.

Clinical development of letermovir and maribavir: Overview of human cytomegalovirus drug resistance

The prevention and treatment of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections is based on the use of antiviral agents that currently target the viral DNA polymerase and that may cause serious side effects. The search for novel inhibitors against HCMV infection led to the discovery of new molecular targets, the viral terminase complex and the viral pUL97 kinase. The most advanced compounds consist of letermovir (LMV) and maribavir (MBV). LMV inhibits the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids by targeting the HCMV terminase complex. LMV is safe and well tolerated and exhibits pharmacokinetic properties that allow once daily dosing. LMV showed efficacy in a phase III prophylaxis study in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients seropositive for HCMV. LMV was recently approved under the trade name Prevymis^™ for prophylaxis of HCMV infection in adult seropositive recipients of an allogeneic HSCT. Amino acid substitutions conferring resistance to LMV selected in vitro map primarily to the pUL56 and rarely to the pUL89 and pUL51 subunits of the HCMV terminase complex. MBV is an inhibitor of the viral pUL97 kinase activity and interferes with the morphogenesis and nuclear egress of nascent viral particles. MBV is safe and well tolerated and has an excellent oral bioavailability. MBV was effective for the treatment of HCMV infections (including those that are refractory or drug-resistant) in transplant recipients in two phase II studies and is further evaluated in two phase III trials. Mutations conferring resistance to MBV map to the UL97 gene and can cause cross-resistance to ganciclovir. MBV-resistant mutations also emerged in the UL27 gene in vitro and could compensate for the inhibition of pUL97 kinase activity by MBV. Thus, LMV and probably MBV will broaden the armamentarium of antiviral drugs available for the prevention and treatment of HCMV infections.

Letermovir for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus manifestations in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) manifestations remain important complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), even in the current era. Unfortunately, available anti-CMV agents, mainly viral polymerase inhibitors, have a substantial risk of myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity. Letermovir, a novel anti-CMV drug that targets the viral terminase complex, has recently been approved for the prevention of clinically significant CMV infection in adult CMV seropositive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. This molecule could become a paradigm-shifting drug in preventing CMV manifestations based on its novel mechanism of action, lack of cross-resistance with available drugs, proven efficacy in a large randomized clinical trial, and its beneficial toxicity and tolerability profile. Drug-drug interactions and the lack of any activity against other viruses are the main shortcomings of letermovir.