Restoring teeth following root canal re-treatment

Direct Versus Indirect Treatment Options of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth: A Narrative Review

One of the controversial topics in dentistry is restoring endodontically treated posterior teeth. Most posterior teeth that undergo endodontic treatment are subjected to a high rate of fracture due to excessive amount of loss of tooth structure. The aim of this review is to evaluate and compare the restorative and prosthetic treatment options to provide clinical recommendations for restoring endodontically treated posterior teeth. Both Medline on PubMed and Google Scholar were utilized for the search. The terms on our keyword list were "crown," "onlay," "endo-crown," "amalgam," and "composite," with the time frame from 1977 to 2024. We also examined the reference lists of potentially relevant papers for any recent review articles. Our analysis examined review articles found through computerized searches, along with relevant citations from the bibliographies of those studies. This review will focus on the dental restorative options and the amount of remaining tooth structure in determining the final restoration of an endodontically treated posterior tooth. This narrative review addresses different treatment options for endodontically treated posterior teeth based on the amount of remaining tooth structure. In addition, it compares the survival rate and the limitations among direct and indirect restorations.

Present status and future directions: The restoration of root filled teeth

This narrative review will focus on a number of contemporary considerations relating to the restoration of root filled teeth and future directions for research. Clinicians are now more than ever, aware of the interdependence of the endodontic and restorative aspects of managing root filled teeth, and how these aspects of treatment are fundamental to obtaining the best long-term survival. To obtain the optimal outcomes for patients, clinicians carrying out endodontic treatment should have a vested interest in the restorative phase of the treatment process, as well as an appreciation for the structural and biomechanical effects of endodontic-restorative procedures on restoration and tooth longevity. Furthermore, the currently available research, largely lacks appreciation of occlusal factors in the longevity of root filled teeth, despite surrogate outcomes demonstrating the considerable influence this variable has. Controversies regarding the clinical relevance of minimally invasive endodontic and restorative concepts are largely unanswered with respect to clinical data, and it is therefore, all too easy to dismiss these ideas due to the lack of scientific evidence. However, conceptually, minimally invasive endodontic-restorative philosophies appear to be valid, and therefore, in the pursuit of improved clinical outcomes, it is important that the efficacies of these treatment protocols are determined. Alongside an increased awareness of the preservation of tooth structure, developments in adhesive bonding, ceramic materials and the inevitable integration of digital dentistry, there is also a need to evaluate the efficacy of new treatment philosophies and techniques with well-designed prospective clinical studies.

Push-out bond strength of various surface treatments on fiber post to root canal dentine using different irrigation techniques

To compare the efficacy of different surface treatments (fiber post) with laser activated irrigation (LAI) technique (various root canal solutions) on root canal dentine in terms of push-out bond strength (PBS) in a fiber post. In this study, 200 premolars were assigned into groups according to various irrigation techniques: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), and 17% EDTA + LAI. In addition, the fiber posts were separated into five groups, (n = 30) according to the surface pretreatment performed: sandblasting, hydrofluoric acid (HF), Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium Scandium-Gallium-Garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser, Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd,YAG) laser and as untreated surface. The posts were cemented using dual-cure resin cement and subjected to a PBS test. Data were analyzed by one way-ANOVA, Tukey, and Tamhane T2 tests. The PBS values were increased in all parts of the tooth in the EDTA and EDTA + LAI treated groups and in groups treated with Er,Cr:YSGG laser fiber posts. In groups in which EDTA and EDTA + LAI were applied, it was observed that dentinal tubules were open according to the distribution and number of dentinal tubule configurations. The improvement of the PBS between fiber post/resin cement/root dentine was observed via the use of fiber post surface treatments with different irrigation techniques.

Can Fiber Application Affect the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with a Low Viscosity Bulk-Fill Composite?

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different fiber insertion techniques and thermomechanical aging on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolar teeth restored using bulk-fill composites.

Materials and Methods

Eighty human mandibular premolar teeth were randomly divided into eight groups: Group IN, Group BF, Group PRF1, Group PRF2, Group IN-TMA, Group BF-TMA, Group PRF1-TMA ,and Group PRF2-TMA. Group IN (intact) and Group IN-TMA (intact but subjected to thermomechanical aging) served as control groups. In the other six groups, endodontic treatment was performed and standardized mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. In BF, PRF1, and PRF2, the cavities were restored with bulk-fill composite only, bulk-fill/Ribbond, and bulk-fill/additional Ribbond, respectively. In BF-TMA, PRF1-TMA, and PRF2-TMA, the teeth were subjected to thermomechanical aging after the restorations. All of the teeth were fractured on the universal testing machine. Fracture surfaces were analyzed with a stereomicroscope.

Results

Control groups showed significantly higher fracture strengths than tested groups (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed among the tested groups (P>0.05). Most of the favorable fractures were seen in PRF1, PRF2, and PRF2-TMA. Most of the unfavorable fractures were seen in BF-TMA.

Conclusions

Although fiber insertion with different techniques did not increase the fracture strength of teeth restored with bulk-fill composites, it increased the favorable fracture modes. Thermomechanical aging did not change the fracture strength of the groups.

Influence of Different Restoration Techniques on Fracture Resistance of Root-filled Teeth: In Vitro Investigation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the fracture strength of endodontically treated mandibular premolar teeth restored with composites and different reinforcement techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight freshly extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were randomly divided into four groups: group IN, group CR, group FRC, and group PRF. Group IN consisted of teeth with intact crowns and served as the control group. In the other three groups, endodontic treatment was performed and standard mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities were prepared. Then cavities were restored with hybrid resin composite only, flowable composite and hybrid resin composite, and Ribbond, flowable composite and hybrid resin composite in groups CR, FRC and PRF, respectively. All of the teeth were subjected to fracture by means of a universal testing machine, and compressive force was applied with a modified stainless-steel ball at a crosshead speed at 0.5 mm/min.

RESULTS

The highest values were observed in group IN, while the lowest values were determined in group CR. There was not any statistically significant difference between group CR and group FCR ( p>0.05). When groups CR, FCR, and PRF were compared, group PRF showed significantly better fracture strength than did groups CR and FCR ( p<0.05). It was determined that there was not any significant difference between group IN and group PRF ( p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Polyethylene ribbon fiber considerably increases the fracture strength of mandibular premolar teeth with MOD cavities restored with composite.