A systematic review of methods for tissue analysis in animal studies on orthodontic mini-implants

The impact of immediate versus delayed mini-screw placement on alveolar bone preservation and bone density following tooth extraction: evidence from a canine model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of mini-screw placement on the alveolar ridge using a split-mouth design. Twelve beagles underwent bilateral extraction of their lateral teeth. In the immediate group, a mini-screw was unilaterally placed approximately 3-4 mm below the alveolar crest of the extraction site on the experimental side. The delayed group received mini-screws six weeks after tooth extraction. On average, the dogs were sacrificed after 11 weeks, and the maxillary bones were excised and scanned using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Histopathological examinations were conducted to assess inflammation and bone formation scores. The results showed that in the immediate group, bone height was significantly greater on the intervention side compared to the control side (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in the delayed group. In both groups, there was a significant increase in bone density around the mini-screws compared to the control sides (p < 0.05). Mini-screw insertion led to a significant enhancement of bone growth in both groups (p < 0.05), with no notable differences between the two groups. The mini-screws did not have any impact on bone inflammation or width. Overall, both immediate and delayed mini-screw placement in the extraction socket positively influenced bone dimensions, density, and histological properties. However, immediate insertion was more effective than delayed placement in preserving vertical bone height, despite delayed insertion resulting in higher bone density.

Evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) With Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices in Fixed Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review

Analysis of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential to ensure that the skeletal and traditional anchoring methods are appropriately and effectively utilized in the context of patient acceptance and satisfaction. This review's objective was to assess the available data on the levels of discomfort, soft-tissue irritation, functional impairment, and other patient-reported outcomes related to the usage of mini-implants in the context of fixed orthodontic treatment for adult patients. A total of seven electronic bibliographic databases were searched between January 1995 and February 2022. Moreover, a manual search was done in the selected orthodontic journals. This systematic review (SR) covered cohort studies, retrospective studies, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) that studied the use of mini-implants, mini-plates, or onplants as anchorage devices on patients receiving orthodontic treatment. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool (RoB2 tool). Three RCTs and two cohorts were included in this SR with a total of 468 patients. Three of the four included studies were at high risk of bias. The pain level was in the "mild-to-moderate" category on the first day following the insertion of mini-implants, then decreased to a mild level from the fifth day to the seventh day of insertion (mean values are 36.61, 16.36, and 11.33, respectively). The levels of functional impairments were found to be located between the "mild-to-moderate" and "moderate" categories after the placement of mini-plates and intermaxillary fixation screws, while they experienced a mild level with mini-implants. The greatest pain levels were found after the insertion of the temporary anchorage devices (TADs) and then decreased until they became mild or disappeared completely after one month. Speaking, chewing, and cleaning difficulties were more problematic when using TADs compared to conventional anchorage. To obtain good evidence in this area, more high-quality RCTs are needed.

[Skeletal anchorage in the past, today and tomorrow]

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal anchorage was not introduced as an alternative to conventional anchorage modalities. The first skeletal anchorage was a ligature through a hole in the infrazygomatic crest. This was replaced by surgical screws and finally the TADs, which were optimized with respect to the material and morphology, were developed. A bracket-like head allows for the use of the mini-implant as indirect anchorage, but should not be a tool for lost control resulting from badly planned biomechanics or failing compliance. Skeletal anchorage should serve as an adjunct to correct biomechanics, to enable treatments that could not be performed prior to the introduction of skeletal anchorage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that temporary anchorage mini-screws help maintain bone density, height and width of alveolar processes in the extraction sites, and thus prevent the thinning of the alveolar ridge usually observed.

RESULTS

In adult patients with degenerated dentitions the application of skeletal anchorage can allow for the displacement of teeth where no anchorage units are present, but also for the redevelopment and maintenance of atrophic alveolar bone. The basis for the optimal use of skeletal anchorage is that the correct line of action for the desired tooth displacement is defined and the necessary force system constructed either with the skeletal anchorage as direct or as indirect anchorage. After a period, during which osseointegrated implants were used as anchorage for tooth movement and bone maintenance, it was accepted that the mini-implants could serve also as anchorage for skeletal displacements avoiding loading of teeth.

Retrieval analysis of immediately loaded orthodontic mini-implants: material and tissue characterization

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the morphological and compositional alterations of retrieved orthodontic mini-implants and the type of adjacent bone, in relation to loading period and anatomical region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy orthodontic mini-implants (Aarhus: n = 35 and AbsoAnchor: n = 35) were placed in the maxilla and mandible of 33 orthodontic patients for anchorage purposes. All mini-implants were immediately loaded for a period specified by treatment plan. Fifty-nine mini-implants were retrieved (Aarhus: n = 29 and AbsoAnchor: n = 30) and examined by stereomicroscopy, reflection Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Tissue samples adjacent to the implants were histologically examined to identify the bone type.

RESULTS

Changes in surface finish, formation of biological integuments, and compositional alterations mainly due to adsorption of proteinaceous material (rich in C, O, N, OH, NH, CH2/CH3, amide I, II, and III, and CH-OH) were identified in all mini-implants. In some cases, mineralized fragments were identified (rich in Ca, P, and Ca-P). In 25 out of the 59 histological sections examined, woven and lamellar bone types were detected. In 12 sections, only woven bone was detected, whereas in the residual 22, only lamellar bone was identified. A significant correlation was found between histological result and loading time but not between histology and region.

CONCLUSION

Morphological and elemental alterations were found for both types of mini-implant surfaces. An increase of the loading period increased the possibility of lamellar bone development around mini-implants.