Evidence-based therapy of chronic urticaria

A case series study of eighty-five chronic spontaneous urticaria patients referred to a tertiary care center

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria is a debilitating disease for the patients and often considered by the doctors a very difficult disease to treat. In 2009 the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology/Global Allergy and Asthma European network/European Dermatology Forum/World Allergy Organization (EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO) published a revised version of the guidelines for the treatment of urticaria which included an algorithm for the treatment.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine the clinical effect and the practical use of the algorithm.

Methods

The study was performed as a case-series study of all newly referred patients to our urticaria clinic over a period of 18 months.

Results

Our results show that the single most important and efficient treatment of urticaria patients is up dosing non-sedating antihistamines as recommended by the EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guidelines. We did not find any predicting factors for responders to the antihistamine treatment, but about one third of the patients did not respond to the up-dosing of the antihistamines.

Conclusion

Antihistamines seems to be the most efficient treatment for urticaria; other treatments such as montelukast, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil may also be used, but only in combination with antihistamines and only in the case of an independent antihistamines treatment failure. The EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the treatment of urticaria offers an efficient and simple guidelines for the treatment of urticaria.

Urticaria and infections

Urticaria is a group of diseases that share a distinct skin reaction pattern. Triggering of urticaria by infections has been discussed for many years but the exact role and pathogenesis of mast cell activation by infectious processes is unclear. In spontaneous acute urticaria there is no doubt for a causal relationship to infections and all chronic urticaria must have started as acute. Whereas in physical or distinct urticaria subtypes the evidence for infections is sparse, remission of annoying spontaneous chronic urticaria has been reported after successful treatment of persistent infections. Current summarizing available studies that evaluated the course of the chronic urticaria after proven Helicobacter eradication demonstrate a statistically significant benefit compared to untreated patients or Helicobacter-negative controls without urticaria (p < 0.001). Since infections can be easily treated some diagnostic procedures should be included in the routine work-up, especially the search for Helicobacter pylori. This review will update the reader regarding the role of infections in different urticaria subtypes.

Chronic urticaria: do urticaria nonexperts implement treatment guidelines? A survey of adherence to published guidelines by nonexperts

BACKGROUND

Guidelines including level of evidence and grade of recommendation were recently published for chronic urticaria (CU).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the therapeutic approach in patients with CU, and to depict how recent guidelines are implemented in the daily practice of management of CU.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional multicentre study through a questionnaire answered by 139 specialists. In total, 695 patients were evaluated, mean+/-SD age 42.3+/-15 years, 62.1% women. Of the patients, 168 were treated by an allergist, 473 by a dermatologist and in 54 cases the specialist was not stated. The drug prescribed was the main variable, and chi2 and Fisher's tests were utilized for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Nonsedating anti-H1 antihistamines taken regularly were the most common drugs prescribed, followed by nonsedating anti-H1 antihistamines taken as needed, corticosteroids, sedating antihistamines taken regularly, sedating antihistamines taken as needed, anti-H2 antihistamines, leukotriene antagonists, ciclosporin and doxepin. Nonsedating antihistamines plus corticosteroids was the most frequent drug combination prescribed. When comparing between allergists and dermatologists we found a positive and significant correlation only between prescription of cetirizine, dexchlorfeniramine, leukotriene antagonists and anti-H2 antihistamines and being treated by an allergist. A positive correlation was found with desloratadine and being seen by a dermatologist. We did not find any difference in CU management in the rest of the treatments studied.

CONCLUSIONS

It is surprising that a large amount of sedating antihistamines was prescribed. In many instances these were prescribed as needed. This fact could have a negative impact on urticaria control and patient satisfaction. It seems difficult for the nonexpert to differentiate between CU and any kind of physical urticaria.

Urticaria: its history-based diagnosis and etiologically oriented treatment

INTRODUCTION

The term "urticaria" refers to any of a group of distinct skin conditions that are characterized by itchy, wheal-and-flare skin reactions (hives). In spontaneous urticaria, the most common type, the hives seem to arise without provocation.

METHODS

Selective review of the literature, including current guidelines.

RESULTS

Spontaneous urticaria is divided into acute (lasting less than six weeks) and chronic types. The pathognomonic itching, hives, and angioedema arise by the same mechanism--cutaneous mast cell activation and release of histamine and other mediators of inflammation--in both acute and chronic urticaria, but these two disorders have different etiological profiles. The underlying cause of acute urticaria cannot be identified in about half of all cases. Chronic urticaria, which is much rarer, is usually caused by autoreactivity, chronic infection, or intolerance to food additives. If the condition persists after the underlying cause has been treated or eliminated, non-sedating antihistamines are the agents of first choice for symptomatic treatment.

DISCUSSION

Unlike acute urticaria, which is self-limited and should be treated symptomatically, chronic urticaria should be treated by the identification and elimination of underlying causes, which is usually curative.

Urticaria

Urticaria and angioedema are common and, if chronic, often persist for years with significant impact on quality of life and occupational ability. To achieve a better understanding of disease etiology and pathogenesis and to compare clinical trials, there is a clear need for cross-specialty and international agreement of the nomenclature and diagnostic classification of urticaria and angioedema. At least in part this has been achieved by two recently published European guidelines. After the urticaria subtype is defined, potential triggers should be sought including persistent bacterial infections (Helicobacter pylori, streptococci, staphylococci, Yersinia, parasites) pseudoallergic reactions (acetylsalicylic acid, rarely food additives) and/or autoreactive mechanisms (autologous serum test). Identified trigger factors should be avoided or eradicated, as this is the most successful therapeutic approach. Treatment of most urticaria subtypes is difficult and besides H1 antihistamines neither standardized nor evidence-based. Low-sedating H1 antihistamines represent the mainstay of treatment, as they have a better therapeutic index and pharmacodynamic properties than older agents. In severe cases their dose has to be increased which is off-label use. The evidence base for treatment alternatives is totally insufficient and the risk-benefit profile of each off-label used drug should be carefully considered.

Moderne Diagnostik und Therapie der Urtikaria

The different urticaria subtypes represent a common diagnostic and treatment challenge for the dermatologist. Usually, acute urticaria is treated symptomatically with modern H1 antihistamines and, if needed, short courses of glucocorticosteroids. In acute urticaria which is often induced by an acute infection no further diagnostic procedures are recommended. In contrast, a targeted work-up followed by specific therapy is required for chronic urticaria, physical urticaria and special urticaria types, because many of these subtypes are characterized by their persistence for several years and have a profound impact on the quality of life. This article elucidates the management of urticaria by presenting five characteristic case reports of patients managed in a special urticaria consulting hour.