Automated mass screening and association rules analysis for comorbidities of psoriasis: A population-based case-control study

Patients with psoriasis frequently have comorbidities, which are linked to higher mortality rates. An in-depth investigation of comorbidities and their effects on health can help improve the management of patients with psoriasis. We conducted a comprehensive and unbiased investigation of comorbidities in patients with psoriasis and explored the pattern of association between comorbidities. A nationwide population-based study included 384 914 patients with psoriasis and 384 914 matched controls between 2011 and 2021. We used automated mass screening of all diagnostic codes to identify psoriasis-associated comorbidities and applied association rule analysis to explore the patterns of comorbidity associations in patients with psoriasis. Patients with psoriasis had an increased risk of autoimmunity-related diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, Crohn's disease, type 1 diabetes, and acute myocardial infarction. The comorbidities of patients with psoriasis with a history of cardiovascular events demonstrated strong interrelationships with other cardiovascular risk factors including type 2 diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, and dyslipidemia. We also found comorbidities, such as malignant skin tumors and kidney and liver diseases, which could have adverse effects of anti-psoriasis therapy. In contrast, patients with psoriasis showed a decreased association with upper respiratory tract infection. Our results imply that comorbidities in patients with psoriasis are associated with the systemic inflammation of psoriasis and the detrimental effects of its treatment. Furthermore, we found patterns of associations between the cardiovascular risk factors and psoriasis. Mass screening and association analyses using large-scale databases can be used to investigate impartially the comorbidities of psoriasis and other diseases.

[Regional variations in healthcare for patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in Germany]

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis (Pso) and atopic dermatitis (AD) are chronic skin diseases that result in significant physical and psychological impairment, financial burden, and loss of quality of life. According to previous data, there are regional differences in healthcare.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to analyse the epidemiology as well as the treatment of insured people with Pso and AD in Germany in a regional comparison.

METHODS

Data of the insurance company Techniker Krankenkasse for the year 2019 regarding treatment prevalences as well as drug prescriptions on the regional level for all physicians were examined.

RESULTS

In 2019 the overall prevalence of Pso was 2.5% (about 2 million insured people in Germany) and AD was 4.2% (about 3.6 million insured people). In Pso, new guideline-compliant drugs were frequently utilised, yet systemic glucocorticosteroids (GCS) were still disproportionally prescribed. Regionally, there were pronounced disparities with higher prescription rates of the new drugs in the north and east. Insured people with AD most frequently received topical GCS (approx. 88%), of which most were class III (66%), and significantly less frequently calcineurin inhibitors (< 10%), which also conform to guidelines. Systemically, GCS were by far most commonly used (about 25% of all insured people with drug prescriptions). Dupilumab, the only long-term drug approved in 2019, was very rarely prescribed, accounting for less than 1%. Again, large regional differences similar to Pso were found.

CONCLUSION

Pso and AD show relevant disparities and gaps in drug care in the regional comparison despite uniform national guidelines and patient needs. The barriers to appropriate modern pharmaceuticals need to be clarified and mitigated.

The impact of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations on disease activity, functional status, and treatment patterns in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from a nationwide population-based study

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) with disease activity, functional status, and treatment patterns in a large population-based cohort of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

Methods

A stratified random sample of patients with axSpA, drawn from health insurance data, received a survey on disease-related characteristics including history (ever presence) of the following EMMs: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), psoriasis (PSO), and anterior uveitis (AU). Survey data were linked to health insurance data, gathering additional information on current occurrence (within one year) of EMMs and drug prescriptions. Separate multivariable linear regression models were calculated to determine the association of EMMs with disease activity (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index), and functional status (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index) after adjustment for relevant parameters, including treatment.

Results

A total of 1729 patients with axSpA were included in the analyses (response: 47%; mean age: 56 years; 46% female) of whom 6% (9%) had current (ever) IBD, 10% (15%) had current (ever) PSO, and 9% (27%) had current (ever) AU. Ever presence of IBD and history of PSO were significantly associated with higher level of disease activity. Ever presence of PSO was also associated with higher level of functional impairment, whereas current AU was significantly associated with lower disease activity. Patients with current IBD or PSO received more frequently biological and conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs as well as systemic steroids. AU was associated with a higher use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs only.

Conclusion

Disease activity is higher in patients with axSpA with history of IBD or history of PSO. Functional impairment is also higher in patients with axSpA with history of PSO. The presence of different EMMs was associated with different treatment patterns in axSpA.

Are Systemic Corticosteroids Causing Psoriasis Flare-Ups? Questionnaire for Danish Dermatologists, Gastroenterologists and Rheumatologists

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis flare-ups and the change of morphology from nonpustular to pustular psoriasis following tapering and withdrawal of systemic corticosteroids have been reported. Despite these risks, systemic corticosteroids are still widely prescribed for patients with psoriasis, but the knowledge about psoriasis flare-ups and whether the physicians take precautions during these treatments is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire study among all dermatologists, gastroenterologists and rheumatologists in Denmark who work at a hospital or in a private practice to investigate the use, opinion and experience with oral, intramuscular and intra-articular corticosteroids in the treatment of patients with psoriasis.

RESULTS

We received answers from a total of 248 physicians. Compared with oral and intramuscular corticosteroids, intra-articular corticosteroids were the most reported treatment in patients with psoriasis and only used by the rheumatologists. It was mainly the dermatologists and rheumatologists who had observed psoriasis flare-ups following treatment with oral, intramuscular and intra-articular corticosteroids. Half of the dermatologists (50%) and a fourth of the rheumatologists (29%) had observed at least one psoriasis flare-up following treatment with oral corticosteroids. About 10% of both the dermatologists and the rheumatologists had observed at least one psoriasis flare-up following treatment with intramuscular and/or intra-articular corticosteroids. Overall, 44% of the respondents took precautions, when they treated a patient with psoriasis with oral, intramuscular and intra-articular corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

The results from the questionnaire indicate that systemic corticosteroids for patients with psoriasis can cause flare-ups and should be used with care.

Systematic review examining changes over time and variation in the incidence and prevalence of psoriasis by age and gender

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of any overview of changes over time and variation in the epidemiology of psoriasis with age and between genders.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic review of published population-based studies on variations in psoriasis incidence and prevalence with age and between genders, and to explore trends in psoriasis epidemiology over time.

METHODS

Eleven electronic and regional databases were searched from their inception dates to October 2019. No language restrictions were applied. Studies were eligible if they reported on changes in psoriasis incidence and/or prevalence over time and/or by age group and gender.

RESULTS

In total 308 papers were critically appraised, from which 90 studies from 22 countries were included. Incidence data confirmed a clear bimodal age pattern in psoriasis onset, with the first and second peaks at around 30-39 and 60-69 years of age, respectively, and evidence suggesting that it presents slightly earlier in women than in men. Prevalence data showed an increasing trend with age until around 60 or 70 years, after which it decreases. Although there was lack of agreement on specific gender differences in psoriasis incidence and prevalence, a slight male predominance was reported in several studies. Studies worldwide suggested a stable or slightly decreasing trend in psoriasis incidence, while an increasing trend in psoriasis prevalence has been consistently reported. One particular challenge faced was the vastly different methodologies used in the included studies, which contributed to some of the heterogeneity of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies on changes over time in the occurrence of psoriasis have contributed to a greater appreciation of the increasing burden of the disease. However, further research is required to determine the reasons driving the increase in psoriasis prevalence over time.

Use of systemic glucocorticoids in patients with psoriatic arthritis by Argentinian and other Latin-American rheumatologists

To analyse the administration of systemic glucocorticoids (SGC) to patients with Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Online, anonymous, multiple-choice, closed-ended survey on SGC use in PsA, dose, duration of therapy, and the reason for administration. One hundred and twenty rheumatologists from Argentina (ARG) and 75 from other countries in Latin-America (LAT) completed the survey. Only 6% of the respondents indicated that they did not prescribe SGC, and 65% claimed that they administered them to less than 10% of their patients. Among those physicians who used SGC, 71% prescribed between 5 and 10 mg/day of prednisone, and only 5% over 10 mg/day. Seventy-three percent of the respondents administered SGC for less than 3 months, and 93% associated them with DMARDs, Biological Therapy (BT), or DMARDs plus BT. Clinical indications for SGC were (more than one option was possible): peripheral arthritis (79%), dactylitis (23%), enthesitis (20%), cutaneous involvement (11%), and axial involvement (8%). Thirty-four percent of ARG physicians versus 21% of LAT used SGC in over 10% of their patients (p 0.07) while 76.5% of ARG versus 59% of LAT administered doses higher than 5 mg/day of prednisone (p 0.01). SGC were indicated by most of the rheumatologists surveyed, but only to a reduced number of patients with PsA, at low doses, for short periods of time, associated with DMARDs/BT, and with the aim of treating peripheral joint manifestations. Argentinian physicians tended to prescribe SGC to more patients and at slightly higher doses.

[Psoriatic arthritis : Overview of drug therapy options and administration characteristics]

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the musculoskeletal system with association to skin psoriasis and is characterized by variable clinical symptoms with very heterogeneous degrees of disease suffering for patients. Clinical manifestations essentially include alterations to the skin and nails, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis and/or spinal involvement. This variability necessitates an individualized therapy of patients with different therapy targets. Apart from international guidelines no therapy recommendations are available in Germany for treatment of psoriatic arthritis. For this reason this article summarizes the established points, characteristics and aspects to be considered in the therapy of psoriatic arthritis in Germany, taking the various main forms of the disease into consideration.

The German National Program on Psoriasis Health Care 2005-2015: results and experiences

In 2005, the first national psoriasis survey in Germany revealed large deficits in health care particularly in patients with moderate to severe disease. The consecutive goal was to improve health care for psoriasis countrywide. For this, a large-scale national program was initiated starting with a comprehensive analysis of structures and processes of care for psoriasis. Patient burden, economic impact and barriers to care were systematically analyzed. In order to optimize routine care, a S3 guideline, a set of outcomes measures and treatment goals, were developed. Implementation was enforced by the German Psoriasis Networks (PsoNet) connecting the most dedicated dermatologists. The annual National Conference on Health Care in Psoriasis established in 2009 consented National Health Care Goals in Psoriasis 2010-2015 and defined a set of quality indicators, which are monitored on a regular basis. Currently 28 regional networks including more than 800 dermatologists are active. Between 2005 and 2014 7 out of 8 quality indicators have markedly improved, and regional disparities were resolved. e.g., mean PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index) dropped from 11.4 to 8.1 and DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index) from 8.6 to 5.9. A decade of experience indicates that a coordinated nationwide psoriasis program based on goal orientation can contribute to better quality of care and optimized outcomes.

Drug supply for children with psoriasis in Germany

BACKGROUND

In Germany there is a lack of robust nationwide data on psoriasis therapy in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Secondary data from the statutory health insurance Gmnder Ersatzkasse (GEK) of the year 2009 were analyzed. Continuously insured children with psoriasis vulgaris were identified by ICD-10 codes (L 40. X). Their treatment was determined on the basis of prescriptions according to ATC code.

RESULTS

1,313 of 293,181 children and adolescents had psoriasis (0.45%). Of these, n = 651 (49.6%) received at least one medication during the observation period. Topical and systemic corticosteroids were most frequently prescribed (70.8% and 4.0% respectively). The relative frequency of prescription of systemic corticosteroids was higher in children treated by pediatricians and family physicians (by a factor of 3 and 5, respectively) than in those treated by dermatologists. Vitamin D analogs were the second most frequently prescribed drugs, used far more often by dermatologists (14.7%) than by general practitioners (1.7%) and pediatricians (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Drug supply for children with psoriasis in Germany appears to be inadequate. The consensus guidelines are not sufficiently considered and the use of systemic corticosteroids is still too high, even after adjustment for steroid-dependent indications. The data underline the necessity of guideline-oriented therapy and implementation of current therapeutic evidence in juvenile psoriasis.

Systemic steroids in the treatment of psoriasis: what is fact, what is fiction?

BACKGROUND

The use of systemic steroids in the treatment of psoriasis is not recommended by dermatological textbooks and guidelines because of the risk of disease deterioration after dose reduction or withdrawal. In contrast to these recommendations, a recent analysis using data from a German nationwide healthcare insurance revealed that systemic steroids were the most frequently prescribed drugs for psoriasis by general practitioners, internal medicine physicians and dermatologists.

OBJECTIVE

As there is an obvious discrepancy between the use of systemic steroids for psoriasis and the reported adverse effects, a non-systematic literature search starting 1950 until today was performed to address beneficial and adverse effect of systemic steroids in psoriasis.

METHODS

Non-systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Regarding the widespread use of systemic steroids in psoriasis and other medical conditions taking the high prevalence of psoriasis of 2-3% at least in Caucasians into consideration, there is a remarkable lack of literature addressing adverse effects such as rebound, pustular or erythrodermic flares or even new occurrence of psoriasis in patients with a negative disease history.

CONCLUSION

A re-evaluation of the treatment of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis with systemic steroids is necessary.