Lidocaine for treatment of severe seizures in newborn infants. II. Blood concentrations of lidocaine and metabolites during intravenous infusion

Treating the symptom or treating the disease in neonatal seizures: a systematic review of the literature

Aim

The existing treatment options for neonatal seizures have expanded over the last few decades, but no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal therapeutic protocols. We systematically reviewed the available literature examining neonatal seizure treatments to clarify which drugs are the most effective for the treatment of specific neurologic disorders in newborns.

Method

We reviewed all available, published, literature, identified using PubMed (published between August 1949 and November 2020), that focused on the pharmacological treatment of electroencephalogram (EEG)-confirmed neonatal seizures.

Results

Our search identified 427 articles, of which 67 were included in this review. Current knowledge allowed us to highlight the good clinical and electrographic responses of genetic early-onset epilepsies to sodium channel blockers and the overall good response to levetiracetam, whose administration has also been demonstrated to be safe in both full-term and preterm newborns.

Interpretation

Our work contributes by confirming the limited availability of evidence that can be used to guide the use of anticonvulsants to treat newborns in clinical practice and examining the efficacy and potentially harmful side effects of currently available drugs when used to treat the developing newborn brain; therefore, our work might also serve as a clinical reference for future studies.

Lidocaine as treatment for neonatal seizures: Evaluation of previously developed population pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen

AIMS

Lidocaine is used to treat neonatal seizures refractory to other anticonvulsants. It is effective, but also associated with cardiac toxicity. Previous studies have reported on the pharmacokinetics of lidocaine in preterm and term neonates and proposed a dosing regimen for effective and safe lidocaine use. The objective of this study was to evaluate the previously developed pharmacokinetic models and dosing regimen. As a secondary objective, lidocaine effectiveness and safety were assessed.

METHODS

Data from preterm neonates and (near-)term neonates with and without therapeutic hypothermia receiving lidocaine were included. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. Simulations were performed to evaluate the proposed dosing regimen. Lidocaine was considered effective if no additional anticonvulsant was required and safe if no cardiac adverse events occurred.

RESULTS

Data were available for 159 neonates; 50 (31.4%) preterm and 109 term neonates, of whom 49 (30.8%) were treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Lidocaine clearance increased with postmenstrual age by 0.69%/day (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.84%). During therapeutic hypothermia (33.5°C), lidocaine clearance was reduced by 21.8% (7.26%/°C, 95% confidence interval 1.63-11.2%) compared to normothermia (36.5°C). Simulations demonstrated that the proposed dosing regimen leads to adequate average lidocaine plasma concentrations. Effectiveness and safety were assessed in 92 neonates. Overall effectiveness was 53.3% (49/92) and 56.5% (13/23) for neonates receiving the proposed dosing regimen. No cardiac toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Lidocaine pharmacokinetics was adequately described across the entire neonatal age range. With the proposed dosing regimen, lidocaine can provide effective and safe treatment for neonatal seizures.

Status Epilepticus in the Neonate: Updates in Treatment Strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to report recent advances in treatment of neonatal seizures, with a specific focus on new literature since a 2013 systematic review performed by this author (Slaughter) and others. There is a paucity of data with regard to well-defined status epilepticus (SE) in neonates, so treatment of recurrent seizures was also included in this inquiry. We aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety profiles of current therapeutic options as well as describe trends in medication selection in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Phenobarbital remains first-line therapy in practice, though there is increasing evidence of its neurotoxicity and long-term sequelae. Bumetanide failed an open-label trial for efficacy, demonstrated an increased risk for hearing loss, and has since fallen out of favor for use in this population. New agents, such as levetiracetam and topiramate, still have very limited data but appear to be as efficacious as older medications, with more favorable side effect profiles. There are limited high-level evidence-based data to guide treatment of neonatal seizures. Emerging research focusing on drug mechanisms and safety profiles may provide additional information to guide decisions; however, further research is needed.

Outside the box: Medications worth considering when traditional antiepileptic drugs have failed

PURPOSE

Review and discuss medications efficacious for seizure control, despite primary indications for other diseases, as treatment options in patients who have failed therapy with traditional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted utilizing PubMed and MEDLINE databases employing combinations of search terms including, but not limited to, "epilepsy", "refractory", "seizure", and the following medications: acetazolamide, amantadine, bumetanide, imipramine, lidocaine, verapamil, and various stimulants.

RESULTS

Data from relevant case studies, retrospective reviews, and available clinical trials were gathered, analyzed, and reported. Experience with acetazolamide, amantadine, bumetanide, imipramine, lidocaine, verapamil, and various stimulants show promise for cases of refractory epilepsy in both adults and children. Many medications lack large scale, randomized clinical trials, but the available data is informative when choosing treatment for patients that have failed traditional epilepsy therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

All neurologists have encountered a patient that failed nearly every AED, diet, and surgical option. For these patients, we often seek fortuitous discoveries within small series and case reports, hoping to find a treatment that might help the patient. In the present review, we describe medications for which antiepileptic effect has been ascribed after they were introduced for other indications.

Lidocaine response rate in aEEG-confirmed neonatal seizures: Retrospective study of 413 full-term and preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the seizure response rate to lidocaine in a large cohort of infants who received lidocaine as second- or third-line antiepileptic drug (AED) for neonatal seizures.

METHODS

Full-term (n = 319) and preterm (n = 94) infants, who received lidocaine for neonatal seizures confirmed on amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), were studied retrospectively (January 1992-December 2012). Based on aEEG findings, the response was defined as good (>4 h no seizures, no need for rescue medication); intermediate (0-2 h no seizures, but rescue medication needed after 2-4 h); or no clear response (rescue medication needed <2 h).

RESULTS

Lidocaine had a good or intermediate effect in 71.4%. The response rate was significantly lower in preterm (55.3%) than in full-term infants (76.1%, p < 0.001). In full-term infants the response to lidocaine was significantly better than midazolam as second-line AED (21.4% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.049), and there was a trend for a higher response rate as third-line AED (67.6% vs. 57%, p = 0.086). Both lidocaine and midazolam had a higher response rate as third-line AED than as second-line AED (p < 0.001). Factors associated with a good response to lidocaine were the following: higher gestational age, longer time between start of first seizure and administration of lidocaine, lidocaine as third-line AED, use of new lidocaine regimens, diagnosis of stroke, use of digital aEEG, and hypothermia. Multivariable analysis of seizure response to lidocaine included lidocaine as second- or third-line AED and seizure etiology.

SIGNIFICANCE

Seizure response to lidocaine was seen in ~70%. The response rate was influenced by gestational age, underlying etiology, and timing of administration. Lidocaine had a significantly higher response rate than midazolam as second-line AED, and there was a trend for a higher response rate as third-line AED. Both lidocaine and midazolam had a higher response rate as third-line compared to second-line AED, which could be due to a pharmacologic synergistic mechanism between the two drugs.

Treating disorders of the neonatal central nervous system: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations with a focus on antiepileptics

A major consideration in the treatment of neonatal disorders is that the selected drug, dose and dosage frequency is safe, effective and appropriate for the intended patient population. Thus, a thorough knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the chosen drug within the patient population is essential. In paediatric and neonatal populations two additional challenges can often complicate drug treatment - the inherently greater physiological variability, and a lack of robust clinical evidence of therapeutic range. There has traditionally been an overreliance in paediatric medicine on extrapolating doses from adult values by adjusting for bodyweight or body surface area, but many other sources of variability exist which complicate the choice of dose in neonates. The lack of reliable drug dosage data in neonates has been highlighted by regulatory authorities, as only ~50% of the most commonly used paediatric medicines have been examined in a paediatric population. Moreover, there is a paucity of information on the pharmacokinetic parameters which affect drug concentrations in different body tissues, and pharmacodynamic responses to drugs in the neonate. Thus, in the present review, we draw attention to the main pharmacokinetic factors that influence the unbound brain concentration of neuroactive drugs. Moreover, the pharmacodynamic differences between neonates and adults that affect the activity of centrally-acting therapeutic agents are briefly examined, with a particular emphasis on antiepileptic drugs.

Lidocaine for Status Epilepticus in Pediatrics

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of intravenous lidocaine in pediatrics for status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE) to determine its impact on seizure control.

METHODS

All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to November 2014), and gray literature were searched. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodologies by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

Overall, 20 original studies were identified, with 19 manuscripts and one meeting abstract. Two hundred and thirty-five pediatric patients were treated for 252 episodes of SE/RSE. Patients had varying numbers of antiepileptic drugs (two to eight) on board before lidocaine therapy. During 20 of the 252 (7.9%) episodes of SE/RSE, phenytoin was on board. The dose regimen of lidocaine varied, with some using bolus dosing alone; others used a combination of bolus and infusion therapy. Overall, 60.0% of seizures responded to lidocaine, with complete cessation and greater than 50% reduction seen in 57.6% and 12.3%, respectively. Patient outcomes were sparingly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

There currently exists Oxford level 2b, Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development, and Evaluation C evidence to support the consideration of lidocaine for SE and RSE in the pediatric population. Further prospective studies of lidocaine administration in this setting are warranted.

Treatment of neonatal seizures

Seizures occur more often during the neonatal period than at any other period of life. Precise incidence is difficult to delineate and depends on study population and criteria used for diagnosis of seizures. Controversy exists as to whether neonatal seizures themselves cause damage to the developing brain, or if the damage is primarily due to the underlying cause of the seizures. As a result of this controversy there is an ongoing discussion as to whether all seizures (both clinical and subclinical) should be treated. When (sub)clinical seizures are treated, there is no consensus about the most appropriate treatment for neonatal seizures and how to assess the efficacy of treatment. Current therapeutic options to treat neonatal seizures (i.e. primarily first generation antiepileptics) are relatively ineffective. There is an urgent need for prospective, randomized, controlled trials for efficacy and safety of these second-generation antiepileptic drugs in neonates. The aim of this review is to survey current knowledge regarding treatment of neonatal seizures in both term and preterm infants.

A systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in neonates with refractory seizures

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are associated with neurological sequelae and an increased risk of epilepsy later in life. Phenobarbital and phenytoin remain the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) most commonly used to treat neonatal seizures, despite their suboptimal effectiveness and safety. As a result, other AEDs, such as levetiracetam and topiramate, are often used in neonates with refractory seizures, despite limited data and off-label use.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review published pharmacokinetic data for second-line AEDs used in neonates with seizures and to provide dosing recommendations for these agents in the neonatal population.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed (1949-May 2012), Medline (1950-May 2012), and Embase (1980-May 2012). Each study was ranked according to the quality of evidence it provided, based on the classification system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Information extracted from each study included study design, number of subjects, gestational and postnatal age, AED dosage regimen, pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacokinetic model, AED serum concentrations, and sampling times.

RESULTS

Nineteen relevant pharmacokinetic studies involving a total of 8 different drugs were identified. No prospective, randomized, controlled studies (level I evidence) or nonrandomized controlled studies (level II-I evidence) were identified; 2 studies were prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled (cohort) studies (level II-2 evidence), 11 studies obtained evidence from multiple time series (level II-3 evidence), and 6 studies were case reports or descriptive studies (level III evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited pharmacokinetic data for the use of carbamazepine, levetiracetam, lidocaine, paraldehyde, topiramate, valproic acid, and vigabatrin for neonates with seizures refractory to treatment with first-line antiepileptic agents. Further research is needed to elucidate target AED serum concentrations (if any) required to optimize effectiveness and minimize dose-related adverse effects in neonates.

Low-voltage aEEG as predictor of intracranial hemorrhage in preterm infants

The objectives of this prospective cohort study were to identify amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) background patterns predictive of severe intracranial hemorrhage. Thirty ventilated preterm newborns weighing <1,000 g were assessed by an aEEG cerebral function monitor and ultrasound measurement of cerebral blood flow velocity at time of surfactant administration and tracheal suctioning simultaneously during first 48 hours of life. Birth weight was 624 ± 200 g (mean ± S.D.) and gestational age was 25 ± 2 weeks. Background electrical activity was predominantly discontinuous in 72% of infants. A sharp increase in electrical activity/burst density was observed during surfactant administration and tracheal suctioning in most infants, with a 33.5% increase in mean cerebral blood flow velocity. Burst suppression with low voltage was identified in 57% infants with severe intracranial hemorrhage, whereas no infant without hemorrhage exhibited this pattern (P = 0.014). We conclude that aEEG low-voltage burst suppression might have useful clinical applications with 100% positive predictive value for severe intracranial hemorrhage.

The use of amplitude integrated electroencephalography for assessing neonatal neurologic injury

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) plays an important role in integrated care of the full-term infant with neonatal encephalopathy. The three main features that are provided with aEEG are the background pattern on admission and the rate of recovery seen during the first 24 to 48 hours after birth, the presence of most electrographic discharges, and the effect of antiepileptic drugs.

Neonatal seizures: dilemmas in workup and management

There is a pressing need for consistent, evidence-based guidelines in the management of neonatal seizures by pediatric neurologists and neonatologists. Israeli pediatric neurologists and neonatologists completed a 20-item, self-administered questionnaire on choices of antiepileptic drugs, treatment of intractable neonatal seizures (unremitting seizures after 3 medications), treatment duration, and recommended workup. The responding 36/55 (65%) neurologists and 66/112 (59%) neonatologists made similar antiepileptic drug choices (phenobarbital as first line, phenytoin as second line, and benzodiazepines as third line). Antiepileptic treatment duration was similar for both groups, but varied considerably within them (range, 1-52 weeks). Neurologists tended to recommend longer treatment for seizures secondary to asphyxia or hemorrhage. Neurologists and neonatologists recommended different antiepileptic drugs for intractable neonatal seizures: valproic acid and topiramate by neurologists, vs lidocaine and benzodiazepines by neonatologists (P = 0.0023). Fewer neurologists recommended continuous electroencephalography monitoring after asphyxia than neonatologists (40% vs 70.5%, P = 0.013). These responses reflect both similarities and inconsistencies of the two groups in diagnosing and treating neonatal seizures. Our findings call for controlled clinical trials to establish protocols for (1) diagnosing neonatal seizures, (2) studying the efficacy and safety of new-generation antiepileptic drugs, and (3) determining optimal duration of drug administration.

Treatments with midazolam and lidocaine for status epilepticus in neonates

Status epilepticus (SE) occurs in children of all ages. Recent epidemiologic investigations of SE show heightened morbidity and mortality in newborns and young infants. However, the existing definition of SE in newborns is not precise and not easily applied in clinical investigations or in clinical practice. To evaluate the underlying conditions, clinical features and treatment of SE in neonates in Japan, a retrospective multi-center study was performed. In the initial investigation, questionnaires were sent to pediatric neurologists in 194 neonatal intensive care units of university hospitals, children's hospitals, and general hospitals throughout in Japan. The questionnaires sought information on the background of each case, types of seizures, etiology of SE, treatments, results and adverse effects of treatment for patients less than 1 week old who had prolonged or frequently repeated seizures lasting more than 15 min and who are refractory to treatment with conventional anticonvulsants, such as diazepam (DZP), phenobarbital (PB) or phenytoin (PHT). As a secondary investigation, 65 cases from nine institutes, which completely fulfilled these criteria and were treated with midazolam (MDL) or lidocaine (Lid) to stop seizures were examined more fully. Subtle seizure and generalized tonic-clonic seizure were the most frequent seizure types. Neonatal SE was most frequently associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, followed by intraventricular hemorrhage, central nervous system infections, and cerebral infarction. The final treatment outcome was available for 72.7% and 81.3% of MDL- and Lid-treated patients, respectively. Adverse effects of MDL and Lid were identified in 7.3% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. To reveal electroclinical seizures, clinical seizures without ictal discharge or other non-epileptic movements in neonates was important for appropriate treatment. MDL and Lid were useful drugs for the treatment of neonatal SE.

Comparison of continuous drip of midazolam or lidocaine in the treatment of intractable neonatal seizures

Seizures constitute the most common neurological symptom in the neonatal period. Treatment usually involves the administration of intravenous benzodiazepines followed by either phenobarbital or phenytoin. For nonresponsive cases, continuous intravenous drip of either midazolam or lidocaine has been suggested for seizure control. Some reports suggest that seizures themselves may have a deleterious effect on long-term neurological outcome. Therefore, there is a need to find treatment regimens with better efficacy to provide maximum seizure control. The authors compared the effectiveness of lidocaine and midazolam in the treatment of intractable seizures in newborn infants born at or after 36 weeks of gestation who suffered from hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and who had their cerebral activity monitored. Thirty infants were included in the study: 22 received lidocaine, and 8 received midazolam. Seventeen (77%) infants had a good or partial response to lidocaine, and 4 (50%) had a partial response to midazolam. Of 20 infants diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy grade 2, 18 (90%) responded to second-line treatment (14 [93%] of 15 to lidocaine and 4 [80%] of 5 to midazolam). Among 10 infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy grade 3, only 3 (30%) responded to second-line treatment (all 3 to lidocaine, none to midazolam). The findings suggest that lidocaine may be more effective than midazolam in reducing or controlling refractory neonatal seizures. The lower response rate to midazolam was more evident in infants with severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (grade 3).

Amplitude integrated electroencephalography in the full-term newborn

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is beginning to play an important role in the care of full-term infants who have neonatal encephalopathy. The three main features an aEEG provides include (1) the background pattern, showing the activity at admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and the rate of recovery during the first 24 to 48 hours after birth; (2) the presence or absence of sleep-wake cycling; and (3) the presence of most electrographic discharges.

Development of an optimal lidocaine infusion strategy for neonatal seizures

INTRODUCTION

Lidocaine is an effective drug for the treatment of neonatal convulsions not responding to traditional anticonvulsant therapy. However, one of the side-effects is a risk of cardiac arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to develop an optimal dosing strategy with minimal risk of cardiac arrhythmias.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As a first step, we studied 20 neonates during routine treatment of neonatal seizures with lidocaine. All were given a loading dose of 2 mg/kg in 10 min, followed by the continuous infusion of 6 mg/kg per hour for 12 h, 4 mg/kg per hour for 12 h and finally 2 mg/kg per hour for 12 h. Effectiveness, cardiac toxicity and lidocaine plasma concentrations were then determined.

RESULTS

No cardiac arrhythmias were observed, and lidocaine was effective in 76% of the treatments. In most of the treatments (13 out of 20) maximal lidocaine plasma concentrations were >9 mg/L. Plasma levels >9 mg/L have been related to cardiac toxicity when used as an anti-arrhythmic drug in adults. It was of interest that all preterm infants showed high lidocaine plasma levels. Secondly, we developed the optimal dosing regimen, which was defined as an infusion regimen at which maximal lidocaine plasma concentrations are <9 mg/L. Simulations with the developed pharmacokinetic model indicated a reduction in the infusion duration of lidocaine at 6 mg/kg per hour from 12 to 6 h. Thirdly, the new lidocaine dosing regimen was evaluated. Fifteen neonates (16 treatments) were studied. No cardiac arrhythmias were observed, and lidocaine was effective in 78% of the treatments. In most of the treatments (11 out of 16) maximal lidocaine plasma concentrations were <9 mg/L. Again preterm infants showed relatively high lidocaine plasma levels.

CONCLUSION

A new lidocaine dosing schedule was developed. This new regimen should have a lower risk of cardiac arrhythmias and appears to be as effective in term infants. For preterm infants the optimal regimen needs to be determined.

Role of cerebral function monitoring in the newborn

For many years, newborn infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units have had routine electrocardiography and been monitored for respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure. Only recently has it also been considered important to monitor brain function using continuous electroencephalography. The role of cerebral function monitoring in sick full term and preterm infants is reviewed.

Postneonatal epilepsy following amplitude-integrated EEG-detected neonatal seizures

To assess the incidence of postneonatal epilepsy in term infants treated with antiepileptic drugs for neonatal seizure discharges that were detected with amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), 206 term infants were monitored using this modality. They received antiepileptic drugs for clinical as well as subclinical neonatal seizures. Follow-up data were analyzed for the development of postneonatal epilepsy and for their neurodevelopmental outcome, assessed at 3, 9, 18 months, and 3 and 5 years of age. A total of 169 (82%) neonates received two or more antiepileptic drugs. Overall mortality was 39% (n = 80). Forty-one of the 126 survivors (33%) were abnormal at follow-up, and 12 of them developed postneonatal epilepsy (9.4%). Eighty-four children survived after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy grade II (n = 92), and 6 (7%) developed postneonatal epilepsy. In this subgroup, no postneonatal epilepsy was observed if seizures were controlled within 48 hours after birth and when not more than two antiepileptic drugs were required. Twenty-four children survived after an intracranial hemorrhage (n = 28), and only 1 (4%) developed postneonatal epilepsy. Eleven children survived after perinatal arterial stroke (n = 13), and 2 (18%) developed postneonatal epilepsy. In conclusion, the incidence of postneonatal epilepsy after treatment of clinical and subclinical neonatal seizures detected with continuous amplitude-integrated electroencephalography was 9.4%; This figure is lower than previously reported in children who only received treatment for clinical seizures.

Burst suppression on amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram may be induced by midazolam: a report on three cases

Continuous amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG) recording with a cerebral function monitor is a useful tool to evaluate prognoses following perinatal asphyxia in term infants. Drugs may change the pattern of the conventional EEG. This report presents three infants treated with midazolam for status epilepticus and repetitive seizures who proved resistant to other anticonvulsants (phenobarbitone, lidocaine). The infants developed burst suppression patterns on aEEG concurrent with high serum levels of midazolam (900-7093 microg l(-1)). Following discontinuation of midazolam treatment, serum levels normalized and background patterns returned to normal voltage traces.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that midazolam can cause burst suppression on aEEG. Therefore, the prognostic value of aEEG is limited in case of high serum levels of midazolam. Serum levels of midazolam should be measured in infants who have burst suppression patterns on aEEG during midazolam treatment.

Neonatal seizures and neonatal epileptic syndromes

The neonatal period is defined as the first 28 days of life of a term infant; for premature infants the limit of this period is 44 completed weeks of the infant's conceptional age (CA)-defined as the chronological age plus gestational age (GA) at birth. The clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) manifestations of seizures during this period are determined primarily by the development features of the immature brain at the time of seizure onset, but are also related to the type and diversity of etiologies and risk-factors for seizures neonates may face early in life. Neonatal seizures may be strikingly different from the clinical and electrical seizures of older children and adults. In addition, findings from basic science investigations suggest that immature animals are more likely to experience seizures in response to injury than more mature animals, although the developing brain is less susceptible to seizure-induced injury.

Lidocaine in the treatment of status epilepticus

Intravenous lidocaine has the potential to control seizures. This article reviews the available evidence related to lidocaine's efficacy and clarifies its potential role in the management of status epilepticus (SE). Although there are no large, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of lidocaine's efficacy in SE, numerous case reports and case series support its use. Most of the reported cases involve patients who were refractory to multiple antiseizure medications. Additional support for lidocaine's efficacy in SE comes from the pediatric literature, where lidocaine has been very effective in controlling SE in neonates who have not responded to barbiturates. Initial lidocaine doses used to stop seizures have ranged from 1 to 3 mg/kg. Most reports recommend a maintenance infusion of lidocaine after initial termination of SE, and a continuous infusion is almost universally recommended for neonates. Toxicity from a 1.5-2.0 mg/kg dose of lidocaine for the control of SE is rare; the authors found only 1 case of a possible side effect at that dose. The article provides a 5-step approach to treating SE that includes lidocaine.

[Treatment of neonatal convulsions]

Three important measures are concommitantly recommended in the treatment of neonatal seizures. 1) The maintenance of vital functions by supplying oxygen and using mask ventilation in addition to cardiac monitoring and placing an intravenous line. 2) The search for an etiology through metabolic and infectious laboratory tests. In many cases this will lead to an etiological treatment. 3) The specific treatment of the seizures: intravenous or intrarectal diazepam is the first line treatment. Phenobarbital, then phenytoin and clonazepam are used when diazepam is unsuccessful. Indications and duration of a secondary prophylactic treatment are controversial and must be discussed on the basis of the electroencephalographic data and the risk factors for epileptic seizures during the neonatal period and at 3 months of age.

Hippocampal slices: glutamate overflow and cellular damage from ischemia are reduced by sodium-channel blockade

We evaluated concentrations of excitatory amino acids released from slices into the superfusing solution and also evaluated extracellular field potential recordings and histological appearance of slice tissues to evaluate several sodium-channel modulating drugs as potential treatments for ischemia. The selective sodium-channel blocker tetrodotoxin (TTX, 1 microM) reduced glutamate release from deprivation of oxygen and D-glucose, while calcium-channel blockade was ineffective. Thus, during ischemia, we propose that glutamate may be released from the free cytosolic pool ('metabolic' glutamate) rather than by exocytosis. TTX (100-500 nM) and voltage-dependent sodium-channel blockers (phenytoin, 20-100 microM; lidocaine, 2-200 microM) each prevented damage to slices without blocking action potentials. The reduction of cellular depolarization and sodium loading during ischemia may explain the neuroprotective action of several sodium-channel modulating drugs in our in vitro studies and also in animal models.

Damage from oxygen and glucose deprivation in hippocampal slices is prevented by tetrodotoxin, lidocaine and phenytoin without blockade of action potentials

In vitro ischemia (IVI) was simulated with rat hippocampal slices in medium lacking D-glucose, equilibrated with 95% nitrogen, 5% carbon dioxide. Within 5-8 min, synaptic potentials disappeared and a DC negative shift (5-15 mV) occurred. Prolonged application of 95% oxygen and D-glucose 12 min later did not allow synaptic potentials to recover. Slices pretreated with sodium channel blocking drugs allowed synaptic potentials to recover after IVI. Tetrodotoxin (TTX, 100-600 nM), the anticonvulsant phenytoin (5.0 to 100 microM) and the local anesthetic lidocaine (2.0 to 200 microM) each delayed or prevented negative DC shifts from IVI. Histological examination showed that drug treatments also prevented CA1 pyramidal cell damage from IVI. Neuroprotection occurred without blocking synaptic potentials or presynaptic fiber volleys, suggesting relevance for treatment of brain ischemia.