Blood pressure support in extremely premature infants is affected by different courses of antenatal steroids

Effect of antenatal corticosteroid administration-to-birth interval on maternal and newborn outcomes: a systematic review

Background

Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are highly effective at improving outcomes for preterm newborns. Evidence suggests the benefits of ACS may vary with the time interval between administration-to-birth. However, the optimal ACS administration-to-birth interval is not yet known. In this systematic review, we synthesised available evidence on the relationship between ACS administration-to-birth interval and maternal and newborn outcomes.

Methods

This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021253379). We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus on 11 Nov 2022 with no date or language restrictions. Randomised and non-randomised studies of pregnant women receiving ACS for preterm birth where maternal and newborn outcomes were reported for different administration-to-birth intervals were eligible. Eligibility screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two authors independently. Fetal and neonatal outcomes included perinatal and neonatal mortality, preterm birth-related morbidity outcomes and mean birthweight. Maternal outcomes included chorioamnionitis, maternal mortality, endometritis, and maternal intensive care unit admission.

Findings

Ten trials (4592 women; 5018 neonates), 45 cohort studies (at least 22,992 women; 30,974 neonates) and two case-control studies (355 women; 360 neonates) met the eligibility criteria. Across studies, 37 different time interval combinations were identified. There was considerable heterogeneity in included administration-to-birth intervals and populations. The odds of neonatal mortality, respiratory distress syndrome and intraventricular haemorrhage were associated with the ACS administration-to-birth interval. However, the interval associated with the greatest improvements in newborn outcomes was not consistent across studies. No reliable data were available for maternal outcomes, though odds of chorioamnionitis might be associated with longer intervals.

Intepretation

An optimal ACS administration-to-birth interval likely exists, however variations in study design limit identification of this interval from available evidence. Future research should consider advanced analysis techniques such as individual patient data meta-analysis to identify which ACS administration-to-birth intervals are most beneficial, and how these benefits can be optimised for women and newborns.

Funding

This study was conducted with funding support from the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), a co-sponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization.

Use of Vasopressors in Extremely Preterm Infants in First Week of Life

OBJECTIVE

 A significant variability exists for diagnosis and treatment of hypotension in extremely preterm infants. Benefits of the use of vasopressors remain unclear. We wanted to identify the risk factors associated with use of vasopressors in the first week of life and their impact on outcomes of extremely preterm infants.

STUDY DESIGN

 Retrospective review of all newborns ≤28 weeks of gestational age (GA) admitted in neonatal intensive care unit from October 1, 2012, to October 31, 2015, done. Data regarding antenatal and neonatal characteristics and outcomes were recorded. Study infants were divided into two cohorts and compared based on vasopressor use. Chi-square, t-test, and multiple logistic regression were performed as appropriate and significance set at p <0.05.

RESULTS

 Of 213 extremely preterm infants, 90 (42.3%) received vasopressors in first week of life. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) at admission in these infants was significantly lower than that of infants who did not require vasopressors (27 ± 8 vs. 30 ± 6 mm Hg, p < 0.05). Vasopressors were initiated within 24 hours in 91% of babies. After controlling for other variables, use of vasopressors was significantly higher in infants with lower birth weight (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-8.3), 5-minute Apgar's score ≤5 (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-3.12), and admission hypothermia (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3-4.9). The use of vasopressors was significantly associated with severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), even after controlling for other significant variables (OR: 5.9, 95% CI: 1.6-9.3).

CONCLUSION

 Lower birth weight, low 5-minute Apgar's score, and admission hypothermia are characteristics associated with early use of vasopressors in extremely preterm infants. Infants treated with vasopressors are at a higher risk of developing severe IVH.

KEY POINTS

· Low systemic blood pressure is a very common problem in the extremely preterm population.. · In clinical practice, mean arterial blood pressure (BP) less than the infants GA in week is typically considered to be "low BP.". · About 50% of infants born at <29 weeks of GA received very preterm in the first week of life.. · Use of vasopressors is associated with a higher incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely preterm population..

Neonatal Blood Pressure Standards: What Is "Normal"?

Blood pressure (BP) is routinely measured in newborn infants. Published BP nomograms demonstrate a rise in BP following delivery in healthy infants at all gestational ages (GA) and evidence that BP values are higher with increasing birth weight and GA. However, the complex physiology that occurs in newborn infants and range of BP values observed at all GA make it difficult to identify "normal" BP for a specific infant at a specific time under specific conditions. As such, complete hemodynamic assessment should include the physical examination, perinatal history, other vital signs, and laboratory values in addition to BP values.

Determinants of neonatal blood pressure

Blood pressure (BP) measurements have been increasingly used across neonatal intensive care units to determine and monitor hemodynamic status in neonates. A number of studies have attempted to derive normative blood pressure data in both preterm and term infants. However, this still remains a complex process, as several maternal and neonatal factors influence neonatal blood pressure. Maternal conditions, including hypertension and preeclampsia, seem to have some impact on neonatal BP, while maternal drugs, in particular antenatal steroids, seem to have a strong influence. Among the neonatal factors, gestational age, post-conceptual age and weight seem to have the strongest influence. The paucity of data on the short and long term effects of maternal conditions and medication on neonatal BP requires further research.

Glucocorticoids and foetal heart maturation; implications for prematurity and foetal programming

Glucocorticoids are steroid hormones, essential in mammals to prepare for life after birth. Blood levels of glucocorticoids (cortisol in most mammals including humans; corticosterone in rats and mice) rise dramatically shortly before birth. This is mimicked clinically in the routine administration of synthetic glucocorticoids to pregnant women threatened by a preterm birth or to preterm infants to improve neonatal survival. Whilst effects on lung are well documented and essential for postnatal survival, those on heart are less well known. In this study, we review recent evidence for a crucial role of glucocorticoids in late gestational heart maturation. Either insufficient or excessive glucocorticoid exposure before birth may alter the normal glucocorticoid-regulated trajectory of heart maturation with potential life-long consequences.

Antenatal glucocorticoid exposure and long-term alterations in aortic function and glucose metabolism

OBJECTIVE

Animal studies have demonstrated long-term effects of in utero glucocortcoid exposure on vascular development and glucose metabolism. We hypothesized that there would be a similar impact in humans.

METHODS

One hundred and two young adults born preterm aged 23 to 28 years, with prospective data collection from birth, and 95 adults born term after uncomplicated pregnancies underwent cardiovascular MRI. We compared cardiac and aortic structure and function, as well as cardiovascular risk profile, in a nested case-control study of 16 participants exposed to antenatal steroids and 32 who were not, but with otherwise similar perinatal care. Outcomes were compared with normal ranges in those born term.

RESULTS

Adults whose mothers had received antenatal steroids had decreased ascending aortic distensibility (9.88 ± 3.21 vs 13.62 ± 3.88 mm Hg(-1) × 10(3), P = .002) and increased aortic arch pulse wave velocity (5.45 ± 1.41 vs 4.47 ± 0.91 m/s, P = .006). The increase in stiffness was equivalent to that of term adults a decade older. Those who had in utero exposure to antenatal steroids also had significant differences in homeostatic model assessments for β-cell function (P = .010), but in multiple regression analysis this did not explain the impact of steroids on aortic function.

CONCLUSIONS

Antenatal glucocorticoid exposure in preterm infants is associated with increased aortic arch stiffness and altered glucose metabolism in early adulthood.