Isotonic versus hypotonic fluid supplementation in term neonates with severe hyperbilirubinemia - a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

The efficacy and safety of isotonic and hypotonic fluids in intravenous maintenance fluid therapy in term newborns: national multicenter observational "neofluid" study

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of isotonic and hypotonic intravenous fluids in maintenance fluid therapy for term infants.

Methods

This was a multi-centre, prospective, observational study conducted in 21 participating centres from December 30, 2020, to June 30, 2023. The study included term newborns requiring parenteral fluid therapy for maintenance (NCT04781361). The fluid treatment was divided into two groups based on the concentration of sodium in the parenteral fluid, designated as hypotonic (NaCl <130 mmol/L) and isotonic (NaCl = 130-154 mmol/L). The primary outcomes were the change in mean plasma sodium (pNa) levels per hour (∆pNa mmol/L/h), the incidence of hyponatremia (pNa <135 mmol/L) and hypernatremia (pNa >145 mmol/L), and the occurrence of clinically significant changes in sodium levels (∆pNa >0.5 mmol/L/h).

Results

A total of 420 patients from 21 centers were included. The ∆pNa was negative in the hypotonic fluid group and positive in the isotonic fluid group, with a significant difference between the groups [respectively -0.07 ± 0.03 (95% CI: -0.13 to -0.02); 0.04 ± 0.03 (95%CI: -0.02 to 0.09), p = 0.04]. There was no difference between the groups in terms of the development of hypernatremia or a clinically meaningful pNa increase. The hypotonic fluid group had a higher incidence of hyponatremia and a clinically meaningful sodium decrease compared to the isotonic fluid group [7.9% vs. 1.2% (OR:6.5, p:0.03)] and [12.2% vs.4.2% (OR:2.9, p = 0.03)].

Conclusion

Contrary to current understanding, this large-scale study is the first to demonstrate that the use of hypotonic fluids in maintenance fluid therapy for newborns poses a risk of hyponatremia development, whereas isotonic fluid therapy appears safe.

Efficacy and safety of isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous maintenance fluids in hospitalized children: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic hyponatremia is a common complication following intravenous maintenance fluid therapy (IV-MFT) in hospitalized children. Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics' 2018 recommendations, IV-MFT prescribing practices still vary considerably.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of isotonic versus hypotonic IV-MFT in hospitalized children.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception to October 1, 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing isotonic versus hypotonic IV-MFT in hospitalized children, either with medical or surgical conditions. Our primary outcome was hyponatremia following IV-MFT. Secondary outcomes included hypernatremia, serum sodium, serum potassium, serum osmolarity, blood pH, blood sugar, serum creatinine, serum chloride, urinary sodium, length of hospital stay, and adverse outcomes.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Random-effects models were used to pool the extracted data. We performed our analysis based on the duration of fluid administration (i.e., ≤ 24 and > 24 h). The Grades of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) scale was used to evaluate the strength and level of evidence for recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 33 RCTs, comprising 5049 patients were included. Isotonic IV-MFT significantly reduced the risk of mild hyponatremia at both ≤ 24 h (RR = 0.38, 95% CI [0.30, 0.48], P < 0.00001; high quality of evidence) and > 24 h (RR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.37, 0.62], P < 0.00001; high quality of evidence). This protective effect of isotonic fluid was maintained in most examined subgroups. Isotonic IV-MFT significantly increased the risk of hypernatremia in neonates (RR = 3.74, 95% CI [1.42, 9.85], P = 0.008). In addition, it significantly increased serum creatinine at ≤ 24 h (MD = 0.89, 95% CI [0.84, 0.94], P < 0.00001) and decreased blood pH (MD = -0.05, 95% CI [-0.08 to -0.02], P = 0.0006). Mean serum sodium, serum osmolarity, and serum chloride were lower in the hypotonic group at ≤ 24 h. The two fluids were comparable in terms of serum potassium, length of hospital stay, blood sugar, and the risk of adverse outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation of our study was the heterogeneity of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Isotonic IV-MFT was superior to the hypotonic one in reducing the risk of iatrogenic hyponatremia in hospitalized children. However, it increases the risk of hypernatremia in neonates and may lead to renal dysfunction. Given that the risk of hypernatremia is not important even in the neonates, we propose to use balanced isotonic IV-MFT in hospitalized children as it is better tolerated by the kidneys than 0.9% saline.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022372359. Graphical abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Higher versus lower sodium intake for preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Infants born preterm are at increased risk of early hypernatraemia (above-normal blood sodium levels) and late hyponatraemia (below-normal blood sodium levels). There are concerns that imbalances of sodium intake may impact neonatal morbidities, growth and developmental outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of higher versus lower sodium supplementation in preterm infants.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL in February 2023; and MEDLINE, Embase and trials registries in March and April 2022. We checked reference lists of included studies and systematic reviews where subject matter related to the intervention or population examined in this review. We compared early (< 7 days following birth), late (≥ 7 days following birth), and early and late sodium supplementation, separately.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised, quasi-randomised or cluster-randomised controlled trials that compared nutritional supplementation that included higher versus lower sodium supplementation in parenteral or enteral intake, or both. Eligible participants were preterm infants born before 37 weeks' gestational age or with a birth weight less than 2500 grams, or both. We excluded studies that had prespecified differential water intakes between groups.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine studies in total. However, we were unable to extract data from one study (20 infants); some studies contributed to more than one comparison. Eight studies (241 infants) were available for quantitative meta-analysis. Four studies (103 infants) compared early higher versus lower sodium intake, and four studies (138 infants) compared late higher versus lower sodium intake. Two studies (103 infants) compared intermediate sodium supplementation (≥ 3 mmol/kg/day to < 5 mmol/kg/day) versus no supplementation, and two studies (52 infants) compared higher sodium supplementation (≥ 5 mmol/kg/day) versus no supplementation. We assessed only two studies (63 infants) as low risk of bias. Early (less than seven days following birth) higher versus lower sodium intake Early higher versus lower sodium intake may not affect mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 2.72; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 83 infants; low-certainty evidence). Neurodevelopmental follow-up was not reported. Early higher versus lower sodium intake may lead to a similar incidence of hyponatraemia < 130 mmol/L (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.13; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 83 infants; low-certainty evidence) but an increased incidence of hypernatraemia ≥ 150 mmol/L (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.65; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 103 infants; risk difference (RD) 0.17, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.34; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome 6, 95% CI 3 to 100; low-certainty evidence). Postnatal growth failure was not reported. The evidence is uncertain for an effect on necrotising enterocolitis (RR 4.60, 95% CI 0.23 to 90.84; 1 study, 46 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Chronic lung disease at 36 weeks was not reported. Late (seven days or more following birth) higher versus lower sodium intake Late higher versus lower sodium intake may not affect mortality (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.20; 1 study, 49 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Neurodevelopmental follow-up was not reported. Late higher versus lower sodium intake may reduce the incidence of hyponatraemia < 130 mmol/L (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.50; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 69 infants; RD -0.42, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.24; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome 2, 95% CI 2 to 4; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for an effect on hypernatraemia ≥ 150 mmol/L (RR 7.88, 95% CI 0.43 to 144.81; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 69 infants; very low-certainty evidence). A single small study reported that later higher versus lower sodium intake may reduce the incidence of postnatal growth failure (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.69; 1 study; 29 infants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain for an effect on necrotising enterocolitis (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.25; 1 study, 49 infants; very low-certainty evidence) and chronic lung disease (RR 2.03, 95% CI 0.80 to 5.20; 1 study, 49 infants; very low-certainty evidence). Early and late (day 1 to 28 after birth) higher versus lower sodium intake for preterm infants Early and late higher versus lower sodium intake may not have an effect on hypernatraemia ≥ 150 mmol/L (RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.63 to 10.00; 1 study, 20 infants; very low-certainty evidence). No other outcomes were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Early (< 7 days following birth) higher sodium supplementation may result in an increased incidence of hypernatraemia and may result in a similar incidence of hyponatraemia compared to lower supplementation. We are uncertain if there are any effects on mortality or neonatal morbidity. Growth and longer-term development outcomes were largely unreported in trials of early sodium supplementation. Late (≥ 7 days following birth) higher sodium supplementation may reduce the incidence of hyponatraemia. We are uncertain if late higher intake affects the incidence of hypernatraemia compared to lower supplementation. Late higher sodium intake may reduce postnatal growth failure. We are uncertain if late higher sodium intake affects mortality, other neonatal morbidities or longer-term development. We are uncertain if early and late higher versus lower sodium supplementation affects outcomes.

Korean Society of Nephrology 2022 recommendations on controversial issues in diagnosis and management of hyponatremia

The Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research, in collaboration with the Korean Society of Nephrology, has published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) document for hyponatremia treatment. The document is based on an extensive evidence-based review of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia with the multidisciplinary participation of representative experts in hyponatremia with methodologist support for guideline development. This CPG consists of 12 recommendations (two for diagnosis, eight for treatment, and two for special situations) based on eight detailed topics and nine key questions. Each recommendation begins with statements graded by the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Each statement is followed by rationale supporting the recommendations. The committee issued conditional recommendations in favor of rapid intermittent bolus administration of hypertonic saline in severe hyponatremia, the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure with hypervolemic hyponatremia, and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis with moderate to severe hyponatremia, the individualization of desmopressin use, and strong recommendation on the administration of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients. We hope that this CPG will provide useful recommendations in practice, with the aim of providing clinical support for shared decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Korean Society of Nephrology 2022 Recommendations on controversial issues in diagnosis and management of hyponatremia

The Korean Society for Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Research, in collaboration with the Korean Society of Nephrology, has published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) document for hyponatremia treatment. The document is based on an extensive evidence-based review of the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia with the multidisciplinary participation of representative experts in hyponatremia with methodologist support for guideline development. This CPG consists of 12 recommendations (two for diagnosis, eight for treatment, and two for special situations) based on eight detailed topics and nine key questions. Each recommendation begins with statements graded by the strength of the recommendations and the quality of the evidence. Each statement is followed by rationale supporting the recommendations. The committee issued conditional recommendations in favor of rapid intermittent bolus administration of hypertonic saline in severe hyponatremia, the use of vasopressin receptor antagonists in heart failure with hypervolemic hyponatremia, and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis with moderate to severe hyponatremia, the individualization of desmopressin use, and strong recommendation on the administration of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients. We hope that this CPG will provide useful recommendations in practice, with the aim of providing clinical support for shared decision-making to improve patient outcomes.

Clinical Profile and Outcome Following Exchange Transfusion for Neonatal Jaundice in a Tertiary Care Centre

INTRODUCTION

Phototherapy has reduced the need for exchange transfusion (ET) to manage jaundiced neonates. Hence there are concerns about increased risk of complication due to lack of opportunity to sustain skills in performing ET. We studied the complications and treatment outcomes of neonates treated for jaundice with ET.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective observational study was conducted from June 2013 to June 2020 in a tertiary care hospital in India. All neonates treated with ET for jaundice were included.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight neonates underwent 31 ET during the study period. Their mean gestational age and birth weight were 37 weeks and 3200 g, respectively. Predisposing factor for jaundice observed were Coomb's positive status (11), hepatosplenomegaly suggesting hemolysis (3), cephalhematoma (2) and birth asphyxia (1). Abnormal neurological status before ET was seen in seven neonates. Adverse clinical events that happened during or within 8 h after ET were desaturation (4), tachycardia (3), tachypnea (2), bradycardia (2), shock (2) and temperature instability (2). One neonate developed acute kidney injury after ET and required peritoneal dialysis. Abnormal lab parameters observed during or within 8 h after ET were hypocalcemia (20), anemia (8), hypokalemia (7), hypernatremia (3), thrombocytopenia (3) and hyperkalemia (2). Post ET sepsis was seen in five neonates: two had only blood culture positive sepsis, two had bone and joint infection and one had liver abscess.

CONCLUSION

The neonates undergoing ET are at high risk of developing complications which may be life threatening. Hence careful monitoring during the procedure is needed.

Efficacy and Safety of Isotonic and Hypotonic Intravenous Maintenance Fluids in Hospitalised Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Hyponatraemia is a known complication in hospitalised children receiving maintenance intravenous fluid. Several studies have been published to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous fluids in children. However, there is still an ongoing debate regarding the ideal solution to be used in the paediatric population. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the safety and efficacy of administering isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous maintenance fluid in hospitalised children. An extensive search was undertaken on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library on 28 December 2020. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included. We used the random-effects model for all analyses. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The quality of each study was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for RCTs. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021229067). Twenty-two RCTs with a total of 3795 participants were included. The studies encompassed surgical and medical patients admitted to intensive care unit as well as to general wards. We found that hypotonic fluid significantly increases the risk of hyponatremia at both ≤24 h (RR 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26–0.43, p < 0.00001) and >24 h (RR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.36–0.64, p < 0.00001). Isotonic fluid increases the risk of hypernatraemia at ≤24 h (RR 2.15; 95% CI: 1.24–3.73, p = 0.006). The prevalence of hyponatraemia was also higher in the hypotonic group at both ≤24 h (5.7% vs. 23.3%) and >24 h (6.0% vs. 26.3%). There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of developing adverse outcomes between the two groups. Mean serum and urine sodium as well as serum osmolality/osmolarity was lower in the hypotonic group. Isotonic solution is protective against the development of hyponatraemia while hypotonic solution increases the risk of hyponatraemia.

Comparison of isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age - a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The use of hypotonic fluids as maintenance therapy in the neonatal population has been in practice for a long time, but there is a lack of evidence for the choice of this fluid in neonates. This study compared isotonic (sodium chloride, 0.9%, and dextrose, 5%) versus hypotonic (sodium chloride, 0.15%, and dextrose, 5%) intravenous fluid for maintenance fluid therapy in neonates more than or equal to 34 weeks of gestational age.

METHODS

In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial, we recruited 60 neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care children's hospital from June 2017 through May 2018 with normal baseline serum sodium levels, anticipated to require intravenous maintenance fluids for 24 hours or longer (intention-to-treat analyses). Patients were randomized to receive isotonic or hypotonic intravenous fluid at maintenance rates for 72 hours. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium <135mEq/L) at 24 hours in both groups. The secondary outcomes were incidence of hypernatremia at 24 hours (defined as serum sodium >145 mEq/L), the incidence of hypo and hypernatremia at 48 and 72 hours, mean serum sodium at 24, 48, and 72 hours, rate of change of serum sodium during the study period, mean serum osmolality at the end of the study period, the absolute difference in osmolality during the study period, the absolute difference in weight during the study period and edema during the study period.

RESULTS

Of 60 enrolled neonates, 31 received isotonic fluids and 29 received hypotonic fluids. Three patients in the hypotonic group developed hyponatremia and none in isotonic group at 24 h (RR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.007 - 2.485; p = .106). Fourteen neonates developed hypernatremia in the isotonic group and one in hypotonic group at 24 h (RR = 13.09; 95% CI = 1.83 - 93.4; p = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results do not support the hypothesis that isotonic fluid is superior to hypotonic fluid in reducing the proportion of neonates developing hyponatremia after 24 hours of intravenous fluid therapy. The proportion of neonates developing hypernatremia is significantly higher after using isotonic fluid for maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION CTRI/2017/05/008585.

Comparison of isotonic and hypotonic intravenous fluids in term newborns: is it time to quit hypotonic fluids

Objective: Hypotonic fluids have been traditionally used in newborns. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence-2015 (NICE) fluid therapy guideline recommends the use of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in term newborns. However, there is no clear evidence supporting this recommendation. This study aims to compare isotonic (5% dextrose in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl)) and hypotonic (5% dextrose in 0.45% NaCl) parenteral fluid therapies in hospitalized term newborns with regard to changes in plasma Na (pNa) and complications related with fluid therapy.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study performed in a tertiary university hospital NICU between January 2016 and April 2018. Term newborns who were initially isonatremic or mildly dysnatremic (pNa <130 or >155 meq/L) and receiving fluid therapy for maintenance or replacement therapy after 48th postnatal hours were eligible for the study. Infants having specific diagnoses requiring extraordinary fluids were excluded. The primary outcome evaluated was the change in mean plasma Na (ΔpNa meq/L/h) at 24 h or at the end of intravenous (i.v.) fluid therapy. Secondary outcomes evaluated were the risk of hyponatremia, hypernatremia, and adverse events attributable to fluid administration.Results: Among the 108 included newborns, 57 received hypotonic fluid (5% dextrose solution in 0.45% NaCl) and the remaining received isotonic fluid (5% dextrose solution in 0.9% NaCl) therapy. The hypotonic fluid group showed a greater ΔpNa compared to the isotonic group (0.48 ± 0.28 vs. 0.27 ± 0.21 meq/L/h, p = .001). The risk of experiencing unsafe plasma Na decrease in the hypotonic fluid group (ΔpNa >0.5 meq/L/h) was higher than the isotonic fluid group (odd ratio: 8.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-30.06). Six mildly hypernatremic babies between 48 and 72 h of postnatal age showed insufficient Na reduction despite the appropriate amount of fluid. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of other outcomes.Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that as maintenance or replacement fluid therapy in the newborn, hypotonic fluids, even 5% dextrose in 0.45% NaCl, can lead to unsafe plasma Na decreases in term newborns, while isotonic fluids are safe when started after the first few days of life. Although the results parallel NICE guidelines, before making recommendations regarding the removal of hypotonic fluids entirely from clinical practice in term newborns following the renal adaptation period; larger randomized controlled studies involving a wide range of babies are needed.

Fluid supplementation for neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia is a common problem which carries a risk of neurotoxicity. Certain infants who have hyperbilirubinaemia develop bilirubin encephalopathy and kernicterus which may lead to long-term disability. Phototherapy is currently the mainstay of treatment for neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Among the adjunctive measures to compliment the effects of phototherapy, fluid supplementation has been proposed to reduce serum bilirubin levels. The mechanism of action proposed includes direct dilutional effects of intravenous (IV) fluids, or enhancement of peristalsis to reduce enterohepatic circulation by oral fluid supplementation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risks and benefits of fluid supplementation compared to standard fluid management in term and preterm newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia who require phototherapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 5), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 7 June 2017), Embase (1980 to 7 June 2017), and CINAHL (1982 to 7 June 2017). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials that compared fluid supplementation against no fluid supplementation, or one form of fluid supplementation against another.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We extracted data using the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group using the Covidence platform. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility and risk of bias of the retrieved records. We expressed our results using mean difference (MD), risk difference (RD), and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Out of 1449 articles screened, seven studies were included. Three articles were awaiting classification, among them, two completed trials identified from the trial registry appeared to be unpublished so far.There were two major comparisons: IV fluid supplementation versus no fluid supplementation (six studies) and IV fluid supplementation versus oral fluid supplementation (one study). A total of 494 term, healthy newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia were evaluated. All studies were at high risk of bias for blinding of care personnel, five studies had unclear risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessors, and most studies had unclear risk of bias in allocation concealment. There was low- to moderate-quality evidence for all major outcomes.In the comparison between IV fluid supplementation and no supplementation, no infant in either group developed bilirubin encephalopathy in the one study that reported this outcome. Serum bilirubin was lower at four hours postintervention for infants who received IV fluid supplementation (MD -34.00 μmol/L (-1.99 mg/dL), 95% CI -52.29 (3.06) to -15.71 (0.92); participants = 67, study = 1) (low quality of evidence, downgraded one level for indirectness and one level for suspected publication bias). Beyond eight hours postintervention, serum bilirubin was similar between the two groups. Duration of phototherapy was significantly shorter for fluid-supplemented infants, but the estimate was affected by heterogeneity which was not clearly explained (MD -10.70 hours, 95% CI -15.55 to -5.85; participants = 218; studies = 3; I² = 67%). Fluid-supplemented infants were less likely to require exchange transfusion (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.71; RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.02; participants = 462; studies = 6; I² = 72%) (low quality of evidence, downgraded one level due to inconsistency, and another level due to suspected publication bias), and the estimate was similarly affected by unexplained heterogeneity. The frequencies of breastfeeding were similar between the fluid-supplemented and non-supplemented infants in days one to three based on one study (estimate on day three: MD 0.90 feeds, 95% CI -0.40 to 2.20; participants = 60) (moderate quality of evidence, downgraded one level for imprecision).One study contributed to all outcome data in the comparison of IV versus oral fluid supplementation. In this comparison, no infant in either group developed abnormal neurological signs. Serum bilirubin, as well as the rate of change of serum bilirubin, were similar between the two groups at four hours after phototherapy (serum bilirubin: MD 11.00 μmol/L (0.64 mg/dL), 95% CI -21.58 (-1.26) to 43.58 (2.55); rate of change of serum bilirubin: MD 0.80 μmol/L/hour (0.05 mg/dL/hour), 95% CI -2.55 (-0.15) to 4.15 (0.24); participants = 54 in both outcomes) (moderate quality of evidence for both outcomes, downgraded one level for indirectness). The number of infants who required exchange transfusion was similar between the two groups (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.27; RD 0.11, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.34; participants = 54). No infant in either group developed adverse effects including vomiting or abdominal distension.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that IV fluid supplementation affects important clinical outcomes such as bilirubin encephalopathy, kernicterus, or cerebral palsy in healthy, term newborn infants with unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia requiring phototherapy. In this review, no infant developed these bilirubin-associated clinical complications. Low- to moderate-quality evidence shows that there are differences in total serum bilirubin levels between fluid-supplemented and control groups at some time points but not at others, the clinical significance of which is uncertain. There is no evidence of a difference between the effectiveness of IV and oral fluid supplementations in reducing serum bilirubin. Similarly, no infant developed adverse events or complications from fluid supplementation such as vomiting or abdominal distension. This suggests a need for future research to focus on different population groups with possibly higher baseline risks of bilirubin-related neurological complications, such as preterm or low birthweight infants, infants with haemolytic hyperbilirubinaemia, as well as infants with dehydration for comparison of different fluid supplementation regimen.

The efficacy of isotonic and hypotonic intravenous maintenance fluid for pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM

This study aimed to analyze the effect of isotonic versus hypotonic solution as intravenous maintenance fluid on level of plasma sodium in hospitalized children.

METHODS

A fully recursive literature search in May 2013 was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE to identify potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. Jadad score and allocation concealment were adopted to evaluate the methodological quality of each trial. RevMan5.2 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials with 752 patients were included. Combined analysis showed a significant lower risk of hyponatremia with isotonic solution (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.51). The isotonic intravenous maintenance did not increase the possibility of hypernatremia (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis revealed that there was potential risk of hyponatremia for routine infusion of hypotonic maintenance fluid. The use of isotonic solution was warranted in hospitalized pediatric patients.

What is the safe approach for neonatal hypernatremic dehydration? A retrospective study from a neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence, complications, and mortality of hypernatremic dehydration in neonates and to compare the effect of correction rate at 48 hours on mortality and on neurological outcome in the short term.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between January 2007 and 2011 in the neonatal intensive care unit. Term neonates were included. The patients were grouped as follows: group 1 = 150 to 160 mmol/L, group 2 = 161 to 170 mmol/L and group 3 = 171 to 189 mmol/L.

RESULTS

Among 4280 neonates, 81 cases (1.8%) had hypernatremic dehydration. Groups 1, 2, and 3 consisted of 55, 23, and 3 patients, respectively. Mortality rates were as follows: 3.6%, 17.3%, and 66.6%. Mean serum sodium (Na) correction rates at 0 to 24 hours and 24 to 48 hours were 0.48 ± 0.2 versus 0.38 ± 0.31 mmol/L per hour (group 1) and 0.49 ± 0.21 versus 0.52 ± 0.28 mmol/L per hour (group 2), respectively. In 32 patients (58.1%) from group 1 and in 13 patients (56.5%) from group 2, correction rate of 0.5 mmol/L per hour or less was achieved. Twenty-two patients developed convulsions, which was the most common complication during therapy. Serum Na greater than 160 mmol/L at admission (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.7) and serum Na correction rate of greater than 0.5 mmol/L per hour (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.5) were independent risk factors for death or convulsion. There was a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 in Denver Developmental Screening Test II results (64.1% vs 30.7 %, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hypernatremic dehydration is an important problem that should be managed properly to avoid adverse outcomes.