Immunogenetic markers as probes for polymorphism, gene regulation and gene transfer in man--the Gm system in perspective

Association between Gm allotypes and asthma severity from childhood to young middle age

Immunoglobulin constant heavy G chain (IGHG) gene polymorphisms are associated with atopy and can be determined by the serum Gm allotypes. We studied whether certain polymorphisms are related to asthma severity and to the extent or intensity of allergic sensitization in asthmatic subjects followed from childhood to young middle age. Fifty-five subjects (28 males) with childhood asthma were all followed-up prospectively on six occasions from a mean age of 9 to 35 years in a study including asthma severity scoring, spirometry, skin prick, and specific serum IgE antibody testing. At the last visit, extended lung function tests and a cold air challenge were performed, and IGHG gene polymorphisms were identified by the alternative serum IgG subclass allotypes, employing ELISA and double immunodiffusion. The 19 subjects with the homozygous IGHG*bf/*bf genotype (originating from the IGHG3*b and the IGHG1*f alleles, which are in strong linkage disequilibrium), showed significantly higher asthma scores, lower airway function, and greater bronchodilator responses from childhood to adulthood, and in middle age greater airway hyperresponsiveness, compared to the subjects with the IGHG*bf/*ga or IGHG*ga/*ga genotypes. Among the subjects sensitized to animal danders, those with the IGHG*bf/*bf genotype showed the highest specific IgE levels. In conclusion, IGHG gene polymorphisms were associated with the severity and outcome of childhood asthma, and with the intensity of allergic sensitization.

Immunoglobulin allotypes and IgG subclass antibody response to Aspergillus fumigatus in cystic fibrosis patients

BACKGROUND

A majority of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) become colonised with Aspergillus fumigatus (Af.), but only a minority develops allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). ABPA is associated with increased levels of specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) anti-Af. antibodies with a characteristic IgG subclass distribution. We examined whether this characteristic immune response was under the influence of GM and KM allotypes, which are genetic markers (antigenic determinants) on gamma- and kappa-light chains, respectively.

METHODS

Sera from 233 CF patients were typed for seven GM determinants and two KM determinants. The types were correlated to IgG subclass anti-Af. antibody levels and to the presence or absence of Af. colonisation as well as ABPA.

RESULTS

The IgG2 antibody level was significantly higher in heterozygous GM (1,2,17 23 5,21 and 1,3,17 23 5,21) compared to homozygous GM allotypes (p = 0.02). Patients with the same allotypes tended to have higher IgG1 (p = 0.051). In patients with ABPA, being heterozygous for G1M and G3M was linked to higher IgG4 and lower IgG3 as compared to the other genotypes. The KM markers did not influence the antibody levels. The allotype GM(3 23 5), associated with atopic bronchial asthma, tended to make a relatively larger group in ABPA patients compared to non-ABPA and patients not colonised with Af. (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

An influence of the GM allotypes on the immune response to Af. and on the development of ABPA in patients with CF is suggested.

Differences in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy phenotypes and genotypes between Mesoamerican Mestizos and North American Caucasians: ethnogeographic influences in the genetics and clinical expression of myositis

OBJECTIVE

As part of a larger, worldwide study of the ethnogeography of myositis, we evaluated the clinical, serologic, and immunogenetic features of Mestizo (Mexican and Guatemalan) and North American Caucasian patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).

METHODS

Clinical manifestations, autoantibodies, HLA-DRB1 and DQA1 alleles, and immunoglobulin Gm/Km allotypes were compared between 138 Mestizos with IIM and 287 Caucasians with IIM, using the same classification criteria and standardized questionnaires.

RESULTS

IIM in Mestizo patients was characterized by a higher proportion of dermatomyositis (69% of adult Mestizos versus 35% of adult Caucasians; P < 0.001) and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies (30% versus 7% of adults, respectively, and 32% versus 4% of children, respectively; P < 0.01). Genetic risk factors also differed in these populations. Whereas Mestizos had no HLA risk factors for IIM, HLA-DRB1*0301, the linked allele DQA1*0501, and DRB1 alleles sharing the first hypervariable region motif (9)EYSTS(13) were major risk factors in Caucasian patients with IIM. Furthermore, different HLA-DRB1 and DQA1 alleles were associated with anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies (DRB1*04 and DQA1*03 in Mestizos and DRB1*07 and DQA1*02 in Caucasians). Immunoglobulin gamma-chain allotypes Gm(1), Gm(17) (odds ratio for both 11.3, P = 0.008), and Gm(21) (odds ratio 7.3, P = 0.005) and kappa-chain allotype Km(3) (odds ratio 7.3, P = 0.005) were risk factors for IIM in Mestizos; however, no Gm or Km allotypes were risk or protective factors in Caucasians. In addition, Gm and Km phenotypes were unique risk factors (Gm 1,3,17 5,13,21 and Gm 1,17 23 21 and Km 3,3) or protective factors (Km 1,1) for the development of myositis and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies (Gm 1,2,3,17 23 5,13,21) in adult Mestizos.

CONCLUSION

IIM in Mesoamerican Mestizos differs from IIM in North American Caucasians in the frequency of phenotypic features and in the immune-response genes predisposing to and protecting from myositis and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies at 4 chromosomal loci. These and other data suggest the likelihood that the expression of IIM is modulated by different genes and environmental exposures around the world.

Familial autoimmunity and the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Many lines of evidence suggest that autoimmune diseases result from chronic immune activation following environmental exposures in genetically susceptible individuals. A genetic basis for autoimmunity is supported by twin and family studies, candidate gene investigations, animal models, and whole genome microsatellite scans. These findings predict, and clinical observations support, familial clustering of a number of individual autoimmune diseases, notably lupus, multiple sclerosis, type-1 diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, and recently the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. Yet, not only is the same autoimmune disease increased in prevalence in pedigrees of persons affected with a given disorder, but other autoimmune diseases are as well. We review these data and propose a hypothesis consistent with these findings. This model posits that a rheumatic disease, as currently classified, is actually composed of a number of elemental disorders. Each of these is defined by the minimal necessary and sufficient environmental exposures and genes that result in a pathology leading to a given sign-symptom complex.

Genetic risk and protective factors for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in Koreans and American whites: a tale of two loci

OBJECTIVE

To better understand genetic contributions to autoimmunity, immunogenetic markers were studied in two racially discrete and geographically isolated populations of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM).

METHODS

Clinical characteristics, as well as clinical and autoantibody subsets, were defined in 151 American white patients and 50 Korean patients with IIM. HLA-DRB1 and DQA1 genotyping was performed on patients and racially matched controls by standard molecular techniques. Gm allotypes and phenotypes were determined by the hemagglutination-inhibition method.

RESULTS

HLA-DRB1*0301, the linked allele DQA1*0501, and DRB1 alleles sharing the first hypervariable region motif 9EYSTS13 were major genetic risk factors for the development of myositis in whites (corrected P [Pcorr] < 0.0004, odds ratio [OR] 11.2, 4.5, and 3.1, respectively, for each factor versus controls). Although both the white and Korean patients had a similar distribution of clinical characteristics, autoantibody profiles, and clinical groups, no HLA-DRB1 nor DQA1 allele or motif was found to be a risk factor for IIM in the Korean patients. However, DRB1*14 was a protective factor in Korean patients without myositis-specific autoantibodies (Pcorr = 0.004, OR 0.046). In addition, although no Gm phenotype or allotype was identified as a risk factor in whites, Gm 21 was a protective factor for the development of IIM in Koreans (Pcorr = 0.024, OR 0.3).

CONCLUSION

Although myositis patients in the US and Korea share similar clinical and serologic features, the immune response genes predisposing to and protecting from myositis in each of these ethnic groups differ at two chromosomal loci. These data suggest that multiple genetic loci should be studied to identify risk and protective factors for some autoimmune diseases in various ethnic populations.

Clinical, serologic, and immunogenetic features of familial idiopathic inflammatory myopathy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical, serologic, and immunogenetic features of familial idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and to compare these with the features of sporadic IIM.

METHODS

Clinical signs and symptoms, autoantibodies, HLA-DRB1 and DQA1 alleles, and GM/KM phenotypes were compared among 36 affected and 28 unaffected members of 16 unrelated families in which 2 or more blood relatives developed an IIM. In addition, findings in patients with familial IIM were compared with those in 181 patients with sporadic IIM. The families included 3 pairs of monozygotic twins with juvenile dermatomyositis, 11 families with other siblings or relatives with polymyositis or dermatomyositis, and 2 families with inclusion body myositis.

RESULTS

The clinical features of familial IIM were similar to those of sporadic IIM, although the frequency of myositis-specific autoantibodies was lower in familial than in sporadic IIM. DRB1*0301 was a common genetic risk factor for familial and sporadic IIM, but contributed less to the genetic risk of familial IIM (etiologic fraction 0.35 versus 0.51 in sporadic IIM). Homozygosity at the HLA-DQA1 locus was found to be a genetic risk factor unique to familial IIM (57% versus 24% of controls; odds ratio 4.2, corrected P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

These findings emphasize that 1) familial muscle weakness is not always due to inherited metabolic defects or dystrophies, but may be the result of the development of IIM in several members of the same family, and 2) multiple genetic factors are likely important in the etiology and disease expression of familial IIM, as is also the case for sporadic myositis, but DQA1 homozygosity is a distinct risk factor for familial IIM.