Tolerability and Effectiveness of Malaria Chemoprophylaxis with Mefloquine or Chloroquine with or without Co-medication

Mefloquine for preventing malaria during travel to endemic areas

BACKGROUND

Mefloquine is one of four antimalarial agents commonly recommended for preventing malaria in travellers to malaria-endemic areas. Despite its high efficacy, there is controversy about its psychological side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the efficacy and safety of mefloquine used as prophylaxis for malaria in travellers.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), published on the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Embase (OVID); TOXLINE (https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/newtoxnet/toxline.htm); and LILACS. We also searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP; http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/) and ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/home) for trials in progress, using 'mefloquine', 'Lariam', and 'malaria' as search terms. The search date was 22 June 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (for efficacy and safety) and non-randomized cohort studies (for safety). We compared prophylactic mefloquine with placebo, no treatment, or an alternative recommended antimalarial agent. Our study populations included all adults and children, including pregnant women.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility and risk of bias of trials, extracted and analysed data. We compared dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Prespecified adverse outcomes are included in 'Summary of findings' tables, with the best available estimate of the absolute frequency of each outcome in short-term international travellers. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 RCTs (11,470 participants); 35 cohort studies (198,493 participants); and four large retrospective analyses of health records (800,652 participants). Nine RCTs explicitly excluded participants with a psychiatric history, and 25 cohort studies stated that the choice of antimalarial agent was based on medical history and personal preference. Most RCTs and cohort studies collected data on self-reported or clinician-assessed symptoms, rather than formal medical diagnoses. Mefloquine efficacyOf 12 trials comparing mefloquine and placebo, none were performed in short-term international travellers, and most populations had a degree of immunity to malaria. The percentage of people developing a malaria episode in the control arm varied from 1% to 82% (median 22%) and 0% to 13% in the mefloquine group (median 1%).In four RCTs that directly compared mefloquine, atovaquone-proguanil and doxycycline in non-immune, short-term international travellers, only one clinical case of malaria occurred (4 trials, 1822 participants). Mefloquine safety versus atovaquone-proguanil Participants receiving mefloquine were more likely to discontinue their medication due to adverse effects than atovaquone-proguanil users (RR 2.86, 95% CI 1.53 to 5.31; 3 RCTs, 1438 participants; high-certainty evidence). There were few serious adverse effects reported with mefloquine (15/2651 travellers) and none with atovaquone-proguanil (940 travellers).One RCT and six cohort studies reported on our prespecified adverse effects. In the RCT with short-term travellers, mefloquine users were more likely to report abnormal dreams (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.37 to 3.04, moderate-certainty evidence), insomnia (RR 4.42, 95% CI 2.56 to 7.64, moderate-certainty evidence), anxiety (RR 6.12, 95% CI 1.82 to 20.66, moderate-certainty evidence), and depressed mood during travel (RR 5.78, 95% CI 1.71 to 19.61, moderate-certainty evidence). The cohort studies in longer-term travellers were consistent with this finding but most had larger effect sizes. Mefloquine users were also more likely to report nausea (high-certainty evidence) and dizziness (high-certainty evidence).Based on the available evidence, our best estimates of absolute effect sizes for mefloquine versus atovaquone-proguanil are 6% versus 2% for discontinuation of the drug, 13% versus 3% for insomnia, 14% versus 7% for abnormal dreams, 6% versus 1% for anxiety, and 6% versus 1% for depressed mood. Mefloquine safety versus doxycyclineNo difference was found in numbers of serious adverse effects with mefloquine and doxycycline (low-certainty evidence) or numbers of discontinuations due to adverse effects (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.87; 4 RCTs, 763 participants; low-certainty evidence).Six cohort studies in longer-term occupational travellers reported our prespecified adverse effects; one RCT in military personnel and one cohort study in short-term travellers reported adverse events. Mefloquine users were more likely to report abnormal dreams (RR 10.49, 95% CI 3.79 to 29.10; 4 cohort studies, 2588 participants, very low-certainty evidence), insomnia (RR 4.14, 95% CI 1.19 to 14.44; 4 cohort studies, 3212 participants, very low-certainty evidence), anxiety (RR 18.04, 95% CI 9.32 to 34.93; 3 cohort studies, 2559 participants, very low-certainty evidence), and depressed mood (RR 11.43, 95% CI 5.21 to 25.07; 2 cohort studies, 2445 participants, very low-certainty evidence). The findings of the single cohort study reporting adverse events in short-term international travellers were consistent with this finding but the single RCT in military personnel did not demonstrate a difference between groups in frequencies of abnormal dreams or insomnia.Mefloquine users were less likely to report dyspepsia (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.74; 5 cohort studies, 5104 participants, low certainty-evidence), photosensitivity (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.11; 2 cohort studies, 1875 participants, very low-certainty evidence), vomiting (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.27; 4 cohort studies, 5071 participants, very low-certainty evidence), and vaginal thrush (RR 0.10, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.16; 1 cohort study, 1761 participants, very low-certainty evidence).Based on the available evidence, our best estimates of absolute effect for mefloquine versus doxycyline were: 2% versus 2% for discontinuation, 12% versus 3% for insomnia, 31% versus 3% for abnormal dreams, 18% versus 1% for anxiety, 11% versus 1% for depressed mood, 4% versus 14% for dyspepsia, 2% versus 19% for photosensitivity, 1% versus 5% for vomiting, and 2% versus 16% for vaginal thrush.Additional analyses, including comparisons of mefloquine with chloroquine, added no new information. Subgroup analysis by study design, duration of travel, and military versus non-military participants, provided no conclusive findings.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The absolute risk of malaria during short-term travel appears low with all three established antimalarial agents (mefloquine, doxycycline, and atovaquone-proguanil).The choice of antimalarial agent depends on how individual travellers assess the importance of specific adverse effects, pill burden, and cost. Some travellers will prefer mefloquine for its once-weekly regimen, but this should be balanced against the increased frequency of abnormal dreams, anxiety, insomnia, and depressed mood.

The position of mefloquine as a 21st century malaria chemoprophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Malaria chemoprophylaxis prevents the occurrence of the symptoms of malaria. Travellers to high-risk Plasmodium falciparum endemic areas need an effective chemoprophylaxis.

METHODS

A literature search to update the status of mefloquine as a malaria chemoprophylaxis.

RESULTS

Except for clearly defined regions with multi-drug resistance, mefloquine is effective against the blood stages of all human malaria species, including the recently recognized fifth species, Plasmodium knowlesi. New data were found in the literature on the tolerability of mefloquine and the use of this medication by groups at high risk of malaria.

DISCUSSION

Use of mefloquine for pregnant women in the second and third trimester is sanctioned by the WHO and some authorities (CDC) allow the use of mefloquine even in the first trimester. Inadvertent pregnancy while using mefloquine is not considered grounds for pregnancy termination. Mefloquine chemoprophylaxis is allowed during breast-feeding. Studies show that mefloquine is a good option for other high-risk groups, such as long-term travellers, VFR travellers and families with small children. Despite a negative media perception, large pharmaco-epidemiological studies have shown that serious adverse events are rare. A recent US evaluation of serious events (hospitalization data) found no association between mefloquine prescriptions and serious adverse events across a wide range of outcomes including mental disorders and diseases of the nervous system. As part of an in-depth analysis of mefloquine tolerability, a potential trend for increased propensity for neuropsychiatric adverse events in women was identified in a number of published clinical studies. This trend is corroborated by several cohort studies that identified female sex and low body weight as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

The choice of anti-malarial drug should be an evidence-based decision that considers the profile of the individual traveller and the risk of malaria. Mefloquine is an important, first-line anti-malarial drug but it is crucial for prescribers to screen medical histories and inform mefloquine users of potential adverse events. Careful prescribing and observance of contraindications are essential. For some indications, there is currently no replacement for mefloquine available or in the pipeline.

WITHDRAWN: Mefloquine for preventing malaria in non-immune adult travellers

BACKGROUND

Mefloquine is commonly prescribed to prevent malaria in travellers, and has replaced other drugs because Plasmodium falciparum is commonly resistant to them. However, mefloquine may be associated with neuropsychiatric harmful effects.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of mefloquine in adult travellers compared to other regimens in relation to episodes of malaria, withdrawal from prophylaxis, and adverse events.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialized trials register (September 2002), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2002), EMBASE (1980 to September 2002), LILACS (September 2002), Science Citation Index (1981 to September 2002), and bibliographies in retrieved papers and standard textbooks. We contacted researchers in the subject of malaria chemoprophylaxis, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing mefloquine with other standard prophylaxis or placebo in non-immune adult travellers, and in non-travelling volunteers. For adverse events, any published case reports were collected.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Adverse events from observational studies were categorised by the study type. We also contacted study authors.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials involving 2750 non-immune adult participants. Five of these were field trials, and of these all were in mainly male soldiers. One trial comparing mefloquine with placebo showed mefloquine prevented malaria episodes in an area of drug resistance (Peto odds ratio 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.08). Withdrawals in the mefloquine group were consistently higher in four placebo controlled trials (odds ratio 3.56, 95% confidence interval 1.67 to 7.60). In five trials comparing mefloquine with other chemoprophylaxis, no difference in tolerability was detected. We found 516 published case reports of mefloquine adverse effects. 63 per cent of these published reports involved tourists and business travellers. There were four fatalities attributed to mefloquine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Mefloquine prevents malaria, but has adverse effects that limit its acceptability . There is evidence from non-randomised studies that mefloquine has potentially harmful effects in tourists and business travellers, and its use needs to be carefully balanced against this. Trials of comparative effects of antimalarial prophylaxis should include episodes of malaria and withdrawal from prophylaxis as outcomes.

Adverse effects of the antimalaria drug, mefloquine: due to primary liver damage with secondary thyroid involvement?

BACKGROUND

Mefloquine is a clinically important antimalaria drug, which is often not well tolerated. We critically reviewed 516 published case reports of mefloquine adverse effects, to clarify the phenomenology of the harms associated with mefloquine, and to make recommendations for safer prescribing.

PRESENTATION

We postulate that many of the adverse effects of mefloquine are a post-hepatic syndrome caused by primary liver damage. In some users we believe that symptomatic thyroid disturbance occurs, either independently or as a secondary consequence of the hepatocellular injury. The mefloquine syndrome presents in a variety of ways including headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, nervousness, fatigue, disorders of sleep, mood, memory and concentration, and occasionally frank psychosis. Previous liver or thyroid disease, and concurrent insults to the liver (such as from alcohol, dehydration, an oral contraceptive pill, recreational drugs, and other liver-damaging drugs) may be related to the development of severe or prolonged adverse reactions to mefloquine.

IMPLICATIONS

We believe that people with active liver or thyroid disease should not take mefloquine, whereas those with fully resolved neuropsychiatric illness may do so safely. Mefloquine users should avoid alcohol, recreational drugs, hormonal contraception and co-medications known to cause liver damage or thyroid damage. With these caveats, we believe that mefloquine may be safely prescribed in pregnancy, and also to occupational groups who carry out safety-critical tasks.

TESTING

Mefloquine's adverse effects need to be investigated through a multicentre cohort study, with small controlled studies testing specific elements of the hypothesis.

Extracts from "Clinical Evidence". Malaria: prevention in travellers

DEFINITION

Malaria is caused by a protozoan infection of red blood cells with one of four species of the genus plasmodium: P falciparum, P vivax, P ovale, or P malariae. Clinically, malaria may present in different ways, but it is usually characterised by fever (which may be swinging), tachycardia, rigors, and sweating. Anaemia, hepatosplenomegaly, cerebral involvement, renal failure, and shock may occur. INCIDENCE/PREVALENCE: Each year there are 300-500 million clinical cases of malaria. About 40% of the world's population is at risk of acquiring the disease. Each year 25-30 million people from non-tropical countries visit areas in which malaria is endemic, of whom between 10,000 and 30,000 contract malaria. AETIOLOGY/RISK FACTORS: Malaria is mainly a rural disease, requiring standing water nearby. It is transmitted by bites from infected female anopheline mosquitoes, mainly at dusk and during the night. In cities, mosquito bites are usually from female culicene mosquitoes, which are not vectors of malaria. Malaria is resurgent in most tropical countries and the risk to travellers is increasing.

PROGNOSIS

Ninety per cent of travellers who contract malaria do not become ill until after they return home. "Imported malaria" is easily treated if diagnosed promptly, and it follows a serious course in only about 12% of people. The most severe form of the disease is cerebral malaria, with a case fatality rate in adult travellers of 2-6%, mainly because of delays in diagnosis.

AIMS

To reduce the risk of infection; to prevent illness and death.

OUTCOMES

Rates of malarial illness and death, and adverse effects of treatment. Proxy measures include number of mosquito bites and number of mosquitoes in indoor areas. We found limited evidence linking number of mosquito bites and risk of malaria.

METHODS

Clinical Evidence search and appraisal in November 1999. We reviewed all identified systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Mefloquine for preventing malaria in non-immune adult travellers

OBJECTIVES

Mefloquine has now largely replaced earlier malaria prophylaxis drugs which are no longer considered to be effective against all Plasmodium species, due to parasite resistance. However mefloquine may be associated with neuropsychological harmful effects. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of mefloquine in adult travellers.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, Medline, Embase, Lilacs, Science Citation Index and reference lists of articles. We contacted researchers in the subject of malaria chemoprophylaxis, and drug companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing mefloquine with other standard prophylaxis or placebo in non-immune adult travellers.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were also contacted.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials involving 2750 non-immune adult travellers were included. One trial comparing mefloquine with placebo showed mefloquine prevented malaria episodes in an area of drug resistance (odds ratio 0.04, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.08). Withdrawals in the mefloquine group were consistently higher in four placebo controlled trials (odds ratio 3. 56, 95% confidence interval 1.67 to 7.60). In five trials comparing mefloquine with other chemoprophylaxis, no difference in tolerability was detected.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Mefloquine prevents malaria, but there is not enough evidence to evaluate its tolerability and toxicity, particularly for general travellers.

Mefloquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis 1992-1998: a review

Mefloquine is an orally administered blood schizontocide for the chemoprophylaxis of malaria in nonimmune travelers. New pharmacokinetic data has shown that food increases the bioavailability of mefloquine. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of weekly prophylaxis in long term travelers have shown that toxic accumulation does not occur and that weekly dosing is associated with protective levels of the drug. The pharmacokinetics of mefloquine are highly stereospecific and all pharmacokinetic parameters, except tmax are significantly different for the (+) and (-) enantiomers. Mefloquine and its metabolite are not appreciably removed by hemodialysis. Steady-state levels of mefloquine can be attained in a reduced time frame of 4 days compared to 7-9 weeks using a loading dose strategy of 250 mg mefloquine daily for 3 days followed thereafter by weekly mefloquine dosage. This strategy, is however, associated with a higher incidence of an adverse event (AE). Cumulative evidence suggests a high protective efficacy of mefloquine (>91%) in nonimmune travelers to areas of chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum (CRPF) except for clearly defined regions of multi-drug resistance. Reports from sub-Saharan Africa indicate a low but increasing level of resistance to this drug. Mefloquine resistance is associated with halofantrine and quinine resistance but not with chloroquine resistance. Penfluridol has been shown to reverse P. falciparum mefloquine resistance in vitro. There is some controversy regarding the tolerabilty of mefloquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis. A review of the studies conducted during 1992-1998 shows that in the reporting of any AE the incidence lies in the range (12-90%) and where there is a comparator, is equivalent to the incidence reported for almost all alternative regimens. When some measure of subjective severity is applied to the rating of AE, it appears that 11-17% of travelers are, to some extent, incapacitated by AE. Major studies and worldwide monitoring have shown that serious events are rare. A recent meta-analysis showed that rates of withdrawal and overall incidence of AE with mefloquine were not significantly higher than those observed with comparator regimens except that mefloquine was more likely to cause insomnia and fatigue. Withdrawals in mefloquine arms were higher than in placebo arms. No performance deficit or functional impairment was observed in five clinical toxicity studies of mefloquine prophylaxis, including a study of driving performance. There is limited data regarding use of mefloquine in pregnancy. Early animal studies have documented teratogenic and embryotoxic effects associated with the use of high dose mefloquine. Two studies have shown a relatively high incidence of spontaneous abortions in mefloquine users. Cumulative evidence, however, is reassuring and has led the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to sanction the use of mefloquine in pregnant women during the second and third trimesters. In conclusion, mefloquine prophylaxis is recommended for travelers to high risk areas of chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The risk of malarial infection and the proven efficacy of mefloquine to prevent malaria should be weighed against the risk of drug associated adverse events.