Current perceptions of travelers' diarrhea treatments and vaccines: results from a postal questionnaire survey and physician interviews

Nitrous Oxide Inhalant Abuse: Preliminary Results from a Cross-Sectional Study on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Italian Physicians (2023)

Background and Objectives: Nitrous oxide (N2O) has recently emerged as a cheap alternative to other recreational substances. Although legally available, its chronic use is associated with severe neurological and hematological complications due to the irreversible inactivation of vitamin B12. While no reliable data on abuse of N2O in Italy have been provided to date, we assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Italian medical professionals on the management of N2O abuse cases. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed as a web-based survey through a series of Facebook discussion groups (targeted medical professionals: 12,103), and participants were specifically asked about their previous understanding of N2O abuse and whether they had or not any previous experience in this topic. Results: A total 396 medical professionals participated in the survey. Overall, 115 participants had previous knowledge about N2O abuse (29.04%), with higher odds for professionals with a background in emergency medicine (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.075; 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) 1.071 to 8.828) and lower for specialists in psychiatry (aOR 0.328; 95%CI 0.130 to 0.825). Knowledge status on N2O abuse was largely unsatisfying, as knowledge status, reported as a percent value, was estimated to 45.33% ± 24.71. Having previously managed a case of N2O abuse was associated with higher risk perception of the actual severity of this condition (aOR 5.070; 95%CI 1.520 to 16.980). Conclusions: Our study suggests that N2O poisoning cases are occurring in Italian settings but are not reasonably reported to national authorities. As substantial knowledge gaps of Italian medical workforces were identified, we cannot rule out that the actual abuse of N2O in the population may be far larger than currently suspected.

Management and Prevention of Traveler's Diarrhea: A Cross-Sectional Study on Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Italian Occupational Physicians (2019 and 2022)

Even though Italian Occupational Physicians (OP) are increasingly involved in the managing of overseas workers, their knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) in travel medicine are mostly undefined. We, therefore, permed a KAP study specifically targeting the management of travelers' diarrhea (TD) by OP. A total of 371 professionals (43.4% males; mean age 40.8 ± 10.9 years) completed in 2 rounds (2019 and 2022) a specifically designed web questionnaire that inquired participating OP on their knowledge status (KS), risk perception, and management of TD through pre- and post-travel advice and interventions. Multivariable odds ratios (aOR) for predictors of a better knowledge status were calculated through regression analysis. Eventually, the majority of participants (53.4%) had participated in the management of cases of TD in the previous months, but only 26.4% were reportedly involved in pre-travel consultations. The overall knowledge status was unsatisfying (potential range: 0-100%, actual average of the sample 59.6% ± 14.6), with substantial uncertainties in the management of antimicrobial treatment. Interestingly, only a small subset of participants had previously prescribed antimicrobial prophylaxis or treatment (3.5% and 1.9%, respectively). Main effectors of a better knowledge status were: having a background qualification in Hygiene and Public Health (aOR 14.769, 95%CI 5.582 to 39.073), having previously managed any case of (aOR 3.107, 95%CI 1.484 to 6.506), and having higher concern on TD, reported by acknowledging high frequency (aOR 8.579, 95%CI 3.383 to 21.756) and severity (aOR 3.386; 95%CI 1.741 to 6.585) of this disorder. As the adherence of participating OP to official recommendations for TD management was unsatisfying, continuous Education on Travel Medicine should be improved by sharing up-to-date official recommendations on appropriate treatment options for TD.

Personal beliefs and misconceptions, not evidence guide general practitioners in the managing of travelers' diarrhea: Results from a pilot study (North-Western Italy, 2019)

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to characterize knowledge, attitudes and practices in a sample of general practitioners (GPs) on management of travelers' diarrhea (TD).

METHODS

A total of 158 GPs (44.3% males; mean age 40.2±12.4 years) completed a web questionnaire on antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) and/or an antibiotic treatment (AT) in TD cases. Participants were inquired on knowledge status (KS), risk perception and effectively applied recommendations for AP/AT through a specifically designed questionnaire. Multivariate odds ratios (OR) for predictors of AP/AT were calculated through regression analysis.

RESULTS

All in all, while 15 (9.5%) participants recommended AP for TD, 61 of them (39.4%) recommended AT. KS was largely unsatisfying as participants extensively ignored the most recent AP/AT recommendations. Acknowledgment of TD as a severe disorder was predictive for recommendation of AP (OR 37.843, 95%CI 4.752-301.4). As for AT, it was relatively elevated in GPs≥10 years (OR 2.653, 95%CI 1.169-6.019), but more rarely reported in participants with higher KS (OR 0.056, 95%CI 0.021-0.153).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence of GPs to official recommendations for TD management was unsatisfying, particularly in older participants. Continuous Education of GPs should be improved by sharing up-to-date official recommendations on AT/AP for TD.

Travelers' preferences for the treatment and prevention of acute diarrhea

BACKGROUND

A survey was designed to assess travelers' willingness to take antibiotic chemoprophylaxis against travelers' diarrhea (TD) or to intervene with antibiotic or symptomatic treatments.

METHODS

A brief written questionnaire was administered to clients in North American (United States and Canadian) and European (UK and German) travel clinic waiting rooms to assess length, purpose, and destination of their upcoming trips; their perceived risk of developing TD at their destination; and their preferences for hypothetical treatment or chemoprophylaxis options, which included descriptions, but no mention of brand names, of a systemically absorbed antibiotic based on a fluoroquinolone, a nonabsorbed antibiotic based on rifaximin, and an over-the-counter antidiarrheal similar to loperamide.

RESULTS

The 209 UK and German travelers planned significantly longer travel than the 277 US and Canadian travelers (25 vs 15 d, p < 0.001) and correctly recognized high risk of TD more often than the North Americans (81% vs 61%, p < 0.001). More of the North Americans preferred any therapy options compared with the Europeans; only 14% of the North Americans preferred no treatment compared with 29% of the Europeans (p < 0.001). More of the North Americans and the Europeans preferred the nonabsorbed antibiotic than the systemically absorbed antibiotic, regardless of if combined with the antidiarrheal agent. Significantly more of the Europeans preferred not to take antibiotic chemoprophylaxis than North Americans (66% vs 37%, p < 0.001). Among the North Americans, significantly more travelers preferred chemoprophylaxis with the nonabsorbed than the systemic antibiotic (45% vs 33%, p= 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Among the relatively small groups of travelers studied, the UK and German travelers were more cognizant of TD risk than US and Canadian travelers. The Europeans were less inclined to take chemoprophylaxis or treatment. Both groups preferred treatment or prophylaxis with the nonabsorbed antibiotic over the systemically absorbed antibiotic or the antidiarrheal agent.