Harm Reduction or Women's Rights? Debating Access to Emergency Contraceptive Pills in Canada and the United States

The not so over-the-counter status of emergency contraception in Ontario: A mixed methods study with pharmacists

Introduction: In Canada, the progestin-only dedicated pill is the most widely used method of emergency contraception (EC). This method gained over-the-counter status in Ontario in 2008. Our mixed methods study explored the progestin-only EC knowledge, attitudes, and provision practices of Ontario pharmacists.

Methods: From June 2015 to October 2015, we collected 198 mailed surveys from Ontarian pharmacy representatives and conducted 17 in-depth interviews with a subset of respondents. We analyzed these data using descriptive statistics and for content and themes.

Results: Results from our English/French bilingual survey indicate that respondents’ knowledge is generally accurate, but confusion persists about the mechanism of action and the number of times the drug can be used in one menstrual cycle. Nearly half (49%) of our survey respondents indicated that progestin-only EC pills are only available behind the counter. Interviewees strongly supported the introduction and promotion of more effective methods of EC in Ontario.

Conclusion: Continuing education focusing on both the regulatory status of progestin-only EC and information about the medication appears warranted. Health Canada’s recent approval of ulipristal acetate for use as a post-coital contraceptive may provide a window of opportunity for engaging with health service providers, including pharmacists, about all available modalities of EC in Canada.

Over-the-Counter Sale of Emergency Contraception: A Survey of Pharmacists in Delhi

Introduction

Pharmacists play a key role while dispensing over-the-counter emergency contraception (EC) to the client.

Aims

The study aims to evaluate the knowledge and over-the-counter services provided by the pharmacists in Delhi.

Methods

A prestructured questionnaire-based survey was conducted in Delhi, the capital city of India.

Results

Only 60 out of 85 pharmacies approached agreed to participate in the study. Number of packs sold in a month per pharmacy varied from 2 to 500 packs/month. Sixty-two percent of the pharmacists claimed that majority of the clients repeated use during the same month. Only 18% of the clients were referred by doctors while 82% directly approached the pharmacists. Nearly one third of the clients were adolescents. Sixty-seven percent of the pharmacists had adequate knowledge about EC. Only 3.3% asked about the last menstrual period or the time elapsed since the last unprotected intercourse. No pharmacist inquired whether there were one or multiple unprotected acts of intercourse, if any regular contraceptive method was being used, or explored the reason for EC intake. There were 91.7% who explained the dosage schedule to clients. Only half of them explained that the client may experience side effects. None of the pharmacists advised their clients for a sexually transmitted disease screening, and 35% counseled the clients regarding regular contraception.

Conclusion

Improving the quality of services provided by the pharmacists can clear misconceptions of the clients and promote subsequent regular contraception along with precautions to avoid sexually transmitted diseases. Mishra A and Saxena P. Over-the-counter sale of emergency contraception: A survey of pharmacists in Delhi. Sex Med 2013;1:16–20.

Is repeat use of emergency contraception common among pharmacy clients? Evidence from Kenya

BACKGROUND

As emergency contraception (EC) becomes more widely available in African pharmacies, public concern in many countries has emerged over perceived "repeat use" of the method. This study examines issues of repeat use in Kenya, a country where women almost exclusively obtain EC from pharmacies.

STUDY DESIGN

Interviews were conducted with all clients who purchased EC from private pharmacies located in five urban areas across Kenya. Over a period of 5 days, a total of 182 male and female EC purchasers were interviewed. χ(2) tests were used to determine the statistical significance of differences between repeat and nonrepeat users.

RESULTS

The majority (58%) of respondents had purchased EC at least twice in the past 1 month. All women interviewed reported purchasing EC a mean of 3.8 times in the 6 months prior to the survey. Those who purchased EC at least twice in the past 1 month were significantly more likely to hold misperceptions about EC's efficacy or side effects. Two thirds of all users reported having a chance to ask questions at the pharmacy, although one quarter felt that they did not receive adequate information.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that many of the women surveyed, particularly those who had sex on an infrequent basis, chose to use EC as a regular family planning method. Among these women, it also indicates the need for better information on EC's efficacy and side effects. Such information-sharing could take place within pharmacies, although interventions must not undermine the core benefits of pharmacy access: convenience and confidentiality.

Ethics, ideology, and reproductive health policy in the United States

The 1994 International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo recognized the centrality of reproductive health to human rights and development. Progress on the Cairo agenda has slowed for numerous reasons, however. The United States, once an enthusiastic promoter of this agenda and still the world's leading reproductive health donor, has revised its reproductive health policies radically since the 2000 presidential election of George W. Bush. This study examines how policies have been reconfigured in five key reproductive health areas, sparking controversy both in the United States and internationally. These categories are the content of sex education, access to emergency contraception and to abortion services, condom effectiveness, and HIV/AIDS prevention. The analysis presented here elucidates how ideological considerations have superseded public health and ethical concerns and reflects on health and ethical consequences.