1
|
Sun Y, Gao Y, Zhu Z, Zhu L. Effect of online intervention mode on breastfeeding results: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health 2023; 20:164. [PMID: 37926827 PMCID: PMC10626799 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01701-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of Internet based intervention model on breastfeeding knowledge, attitude, self-confidence and breastfeeding rate. METHODS An electronic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM and VIP database was performed using combinations of the keywords "Breastfeeding," "Breastfeeding, Exclusive," "Internet," "Online," and "Website". The retrieval period was from their inception to March 31, 2023. Quality appraisal was performed using the Cochrane 5.1 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RevMan5.3 was used for data analysis. RESULTS Thirty-two studies were included in the review, with a total of 9514 samples. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, compared with routine nursing, the intervention model based on the Internet can effectively improve breastfeeding knowledge and attitude of pregnant women, improve breastfeeding self-confidence (P < 0.05), and improve the rate of exclusive breastfeeding in the short term (within 6 weeks) and the long-term postpartum (3-6 months) had a positive effect on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The Internet breastfeeding intervention model may be an effective intervention to improve the effect of exclusive breastfeeding. In the future, more high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials can be carried out to further explore the effect of the Internet intervention model on breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Sun
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China
| | - Yutong Gao
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China
| | - Zhiling Zhu
- Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang, Henan, China
| | - Lili Zhu
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gavine A, Shinwell SC, Buchanan P, Farre A, Wade A, Lynn F, Marshall J, Cumming SE, Dare S, McFadden A. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 10:CD001141. [PMID: 36282618 PMCID: PMC9595242 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended that infants be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet until at least two years of age. However, current breastfeeding rates in many countries do not reflect this recommendation. OBJECTIVES 1. To describe types of breastfeeding support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. 2. To examine the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding support interventions in terms of whether they offered only breastfeeding support or breastfeeding support in combination with a wider maternal and child health intervention ('breastfeeding plus' support). 3. To examine the effectiveness of the following intervention characteristics on breastfeeding support: a. type of support (e.g. face-to-face, telephone, digital technologies, group or individual support, proactive or reactive); b. intensity of support (i.e. number of postnatal contacts); c. person delivering the intervention (e.g. healthcare professional, lay person); d. to examine whether the impact of support varied between high- and low-and middle-income countries. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (which includes results of searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)) (11 May 2021) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care. Support could be provided face-to-face, over the phone or via digital technologies. All studies had to meet the trustworthiness criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth methods. Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and study trustworthiness. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This updated review includes 116 trials of which 103 contribute data to the analyses. In total more than 98,816 mother-infant pairs were included. Moderate-certainty evidence indicated that 'breastfeeding only' support probably reduced the number of women stopping breastfeeding for all primary outcomes: stopping any breastfeeding at six months (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.89 to 0.97); stopping exclusive breastfeeding at six months (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.93); stopping any breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97); and stopping exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 (RR 0.83 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90). Similar findings were reported for the secondary breastfeeding outcomes except for any breastfeeding at two months and 12 months when the evidence was uncertain if 'breastfeeding only' support helped reduce the number of women stopping breastfeeding. The evidence for 'breastfeeding plus' was less consistent. For primary outcomes there was some evidence that 'breastfeeding plus' support probably reduced the number of women stopping any breastfeeding (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, moderate-certainty evidence) or exclusive breastfeeding at six months (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.90). 'Breastfeeding plus' interventions may have a beneficial effect on reducing the number of women stopping exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95). The evidence suggests that 'breastfeeding plus' support probably results in little to no difference in the number of women stopping any breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08, moderate-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcomes, it was uncertain if 'breastfeeding plus' support helped reduce the number of women stopping any or exclusive breastfeeding at any time points. There were no consistent findings emerging from the narrative synthesis of the non-breastfeeding outcomes (maternal satisfaction with care, maternal satisfaction with feeding method, infant morbidity, and maternal mental health), except for a possible reduction of diarrhoea in intervention infants. We considered the overall risk of bias of trials included in the review was mixed. Blinding of participants and personnel is not feasible in such interventions and as studies utilised self-report breastfeeding data, there is also a risk of bias in outcome assessment. We conducted meta-regression to explore substantial heterogeneity for the primary outcomes using the following categories: person providing care; mode of delivery; intensity of support; and income status of country. It is possible that moderate levels (defined as 4-8 visits) of 'breastfeeding only' support may be associated with a more beneficial effect on exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks and six months. 'Breastfeeding only' support may also be more effective in reducing women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) stopping exclusive breastfeeding at six months compared to women in high-income countries (HICs). However, no other differential effects were found and thus heterogeneity remains largely unexplained. The meta-regression suggested that there were no differential effects regarding person providing support or mode of delivery, however, power was limited. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When 'breastfeeding only' support is offered to women, the duration and in particular, the exclusivity of breastfeeding is likely to be increased. Support may also be more effective in reducing the number of women stopping breastfeeding at three to four months compared to later time points. For 'breastfeeding plus' interventions the evidence is less certain. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Support can also be offered face-to-face, via telephone or digital technologies, or a combination and may be more effective when delivered on a schedule of four to eight visits. Further work is needed to identify components of the effective interventions and to deliver interventions on a larger scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gavine
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Shona C Shinwell
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Albert Farre
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Angela Wade
- Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lynn
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joyce Marshall
- Division of Maternal Health, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Sara E Cumming
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Shadrach Dare
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Alison McFadden
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang K, Gerling K, Chen W, Geurts L. Information and Communication Systems to Tackle Barriers to Breastfeeding: Systematic Search and Review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13947. [PMID: 31573903 PMCID: PMC6818436 DOI: 10.2196/13947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breastfeeding has many benefits for newborns, mothers, and the wider society. The World Health Organization recommends mothers to feed newborns exclusively with breastmilk for the first 6 months after birth, but breastfeeding rates in many countries fail to align with the recommendations because of various barriers. Breastfeeding success is associated with a number of determinants, such as self-efficacy, intention to breastfeed, and attitudes toward breastfeeding. Information and communication technology (ICT) has been leveraged to support breastfeeding by means of improving knowledge or providing practical supports in different maternal stages. Previous reviews have examined and summarized the effectiveness and credibility of interventions; however, no review has been done from a human-computer interaction perspective that is concerned with novel interaction techniques and the perspective of end users. Objective The objective of this review was to provide a comprehensive overview of existing digital interventions that support breastfeeding by investigating systems’ objective, technology design, validation process, and quality attributes, both in terms of clinical parameters as well as usability and user experience. Methods A systematic search was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in the following libraries: PubMed, Science Direct, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM Digital Library), and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Xplore (IEEE Xplore). Results A total of 35 papers discussing 30 interventions were included. The main goals of these interventions were organized into 4 categories: breastfeeding education (n=12), breastfeeding promotion (n=8), communication support (n=6), and daily practical support (n=4). Of the interventions, 13 target mothers in the postnatal period. Most interventions come in forms of client communication systems (n=18), which frequently leverage Web technologies, text message, and mobile apps to provide breastfeeding support. Systems predominantly focus on mothers; validation strategies were rather heterogeneous, with 12 user studies concerning usability and user experience and 18 clinical validation studies focusing on the effects of the interventions on breastfeeding determinants; 5 papers did not report results. Generally, straightforward systems (eg, communication tools or Web-based solutions) seem to be more effective than complex interventions (eg, games). Conclusions Existing information and communication systems offer effective means of improving breastfeeding outcomes, but they do not address all relevant periods in parenthood (eg, the antenatal period) and often do not involve important stakeholders, such as partners. There is an opportunity to leverage more complex technical systems to open up avenues for the broader design of ICT to support breastfeeding; however, considering evaluation outcomes of existing support systems of higher complexity, such systems need to be designed with care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kymeng Tang
- e-Media Research Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Wei Chen
- Center for Intelligent Medical Electronics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Luc Geurts
- e-Media Research Lab, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Davie P, Chilcot J, Chang YS, Norton S, Hughes LD, Bick D. Effectiveness of social-psychological interventions at promoting breastfeeding initiation, duration and exclusivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2019; 14:449-485. [DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1630293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Davie
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Yan-Shing Chang
- Child and Family Health Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Lyndsay D. Hughes
- Health Psychology Section, Department of Psychology, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Debra Bick
- Department of Women and Children’s Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Silva NVDND, Pontes CM, Sousa NFCD, Vasconcelos MGLD. [Health Technologies and their contributions to the promotion of breastfeeding: an integrative review of the literature]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2019; 24:589-602. [PMID: 30726390 DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018242.03022017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Technologies can be promoters of breastfeeding. The scope of this review is therefore to identify health technologies and their contribution to the promotion of breastfeeding. A search was conducted in the following databases: Lilacs, SCOPUS, Medline and CINAHL, using the key words "breastfeeding," "technology" and "health promotion." The final sample consisted of 24 original articles, among which 19 technologies were identified and classified in managerial, educational and healthcare groupings. Educational technologies were predominant (12) and presented greater contributions to the promotion of breastfeeding. The combination of different technologies has revealed positive results in maintaining breastfeeding. The lack of studies with the use of managerial technologies during the lactation process, as well as the development of other research that prove the effects of each technology on increasing the prevalence of breastfeeding, was clearly detected in the review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naélia Vidal de Negreiros da Silva
- Departamento de Enfermagem, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. R. Prof. Moraes Rêgo S/N, Cidade Universitária. 50670-901 Recife PE Brasil.
| | - Cleide Maria Pontes
- Departamento de Enfermagem, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. R. Prof. Moraes Rêgo S/N, Cidade Universitária. 50670-901 Recife PE Brasil.
| | - Nayara Francisca Cabral de Sousa
- Departamento de Enfermagem, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. R. Prof. Moraes Rêgo S/N, Cidade Universitária. 50670-901 Recife PE Brasil.
| | - Maria Gorete Lucena de Vasconcelos
- Departamento de Enfermagem, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. R. Prof. Moraes Rêgo S/N, Cidade Universitária. 50670-901 Recife PE Brasil.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abuidhail J, Mrayan L, Jaradat D. Evaluating effects of prenatal web-based breastfeeding education for pregnant mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy: Prospective randomized control trial. Midwifery 2018; 69:143-149. [PMID: 30513445 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Education is the cornerstone supporting breastfeeding practices. However, the traditional oral education method cannot always satisfy the learning needs of mothers. OBJECTIVE to measure the effectiveness of prenatal web-based breastfeeding education program for Jordanian pregnant mothers in their third trimester of pregnancy on enhancing knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy of breastfeeding after giving birth. METHODS prospective randomized control trial design was used with sample consisted of 112 pregnant mothers who were recruited from one antenatal clinic in Irbid Governorate. Data collection instruments were the infant feeding knowledge and attitudes (IIFAS) and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES) were used to measure self efficacy, knowledge and attitudes regarding breastfeeding. RESULTS Participants of the experimental group were at moderate level of BSES in pre and post intervention with increasing the number of mothers in the same level post intervention. Participants were at a neutral level of IIFAS in both groups generally, they were neither positive to breastfeeding nor to bottle feeding. There was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups on post- intervention scores on BSES and IIFAS. CONCLUSION This study is considered the first trial to use new teaching methodologies as internet and website in teaching mothers about breastfeeding. Despite that there were not differences between intervention and control groups, web-based breastfeeding education program may contribute in improving breastfeeding self efficacy. IMPLICATIONS Inclusion prenatal web-based breastfeeding education in antenatal clinics at MCHC centers of Ministry of Health. Further research is needed to replicate this study in other Jordanian health settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamila Abuidhail
- Faculty of Nursing, Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330133, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
| | - Lina Mrayan
- Faculty of Nursing, Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330133, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
| | - Dima Jaradat
- Faculty of Nursing, Hashemite University, P.O. Box 330133, Zarqa, 13133, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Winston K, Grendarova P, Rabi D. Video-based patient decision aids: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:558-578. [PMID: 29102063 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study reviews the published literature on the use of video-based decision aids (DA) for patients. The authors describe the areas of medicine in which video-based patient DA have been evaluated, the medical decisions targeted, their reported impact, in which countries studies are being conducted, and publication trends. METHOD The literature review was conducted systematically using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Pubmed databases from inception to 2016. References of identified studies were reviewed, and hand-searches of relevant journals were conducted. RESULTS 488 studies were included and organized based on predefined study characteristics. The most common decisions addressed were cancer screening, risk reduction, advance care planning, and adherence to provider recommendations. Most studies had sample sizes of fewer than 300, and most were performed in the United States. Outcomes were generally reported as positive. This field of study was relatively unknown before 1990s but the number of studies published annually continues to increase. CONCLUSION Videos are largely positive interventions but there are significant remaining knowledge gaps including generalizability across populations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians should consider incorporating video-based DA in their patient interactions. Future research should focus on less studied areas and the mechanisms underlying effective patient decision aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Winston
- Alberta Children's Hospital, 2800 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada.
| | - Petra Grendarova
- University of Calgary, Division of Radiation Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Doreen Rabi
- University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang CJ, Chaovalit P, Pongnumkul S. A Breastfeed-Promoting Mobile App Intervention: Usability and Usefulness Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6:e27. [PMID: 29374000 PMCID: PMC5807626 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breastfeeding is proven to have lasting health benefits for both mothers and infants; however, 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rate remains below 20% in Thailand. Although the number of research literature and commercial apps for breastfeeding women is significantly growing, they are country-specific and restricted to English-speaking users. There exists a major knowledge gap on how mobile health apps could support breastfeeding in Thailand. To address these gaps, MoomMae has been developed with the intention to support Thai women in breastfeeding outside of their homes and in keeping their feeding records. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the usability and usefulness of MoomMae, a mobile phone app designed to support breastfeeding women. METHODS Our study was reviewed and approved by Thailand's National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA) ethics committee. A total of 21 breastfeeding women with at least one Android phone or tablet were recruited via convenience and snowball sampling. The study process for each participant was as follows: the participant was requested to attend a preuse interview and given the app to use for 4 weeks. Following this period, a postuse interview was conducted to examine the usability and usefulness of the app. Both sessions were held individually and audiorecorded for qualitative analysis. RESULTS The mean scores of usability and usefulness from the postuse survey were 4.33 (SD 0.87; range 1-5) and 4.60 (SD 0.74; range 2-5). Our qualitative analysis revealed a total of 137 feedbacks: 71 related to usability and 66 associated with usefulness. A further sentimental analysis showed that comments on usability were generally negative (59 negative, 11 positive, and 1 neutral), and comments on usefulness were relatively positive (56 positive, 9 negative, and 1 neutral). We discovered 26 unique design issues and proposed recommendations for future improvement. CONCLUSIONS Our usability and usefulness assessment of MoomMae demonstrated that MoomMae has a great potential to be a useful self-management tool for breastfeeding mothers in Thailand. The qualitative analysis suggested that the app is supportive of breastfeeding on demand, but the flow and inputs of the app should be redesigned to be more intuitive. For future implementations, the most desirable feature is a pump-reminding notification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Jau Wang
- National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Pimwadee Chaovalit
- National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| | - Suporn Pongnumkul
- National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, Pathum Thani, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McFadden A, Gavine A, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, Buchanan P, Taylor JL, Veitch E, Rennie AM, Crowther SA, Neiman S, MacGillivray S. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2:CD001141. [PMID: 28244064 PMCID: PMC6464485 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended that infants be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet until at least two years of age. However, current breastfeeding rates in many countries do not reflect this recommendation. OBJECTIVES To describe forms of breastfeeding support which have been evaluated in controlled studies, the timing of the interventions and the settings in which they have been used.To examine the effectiveness of different modes of offering similar supportive interventions (for example, whether the support offered was proactive or reactive, face-to-face or over the telephone), and whether interventions containing both antenatal and postnatal elements were more effective than those taking place in the postnatal period alone.To examine the effectiveness of different care providers and (where information was available) training.To explore the interaction between background breastfeeding rates and effectiveness of support. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This updated review includes 100 trials involving more than 83,246 mother-infant pairs of which 73 studies contribute data (58 individually-randomised trials and 15 cluster-randomised trials). We considered that the overall risk of bias of trials included in the review was mixed. Of the 31 new studies included in this update, 21 provided data for one or more of the primary outcomes. The total number of mother-infant pairs in the 73 studies that contributed data to this review is 74,656 (this total was 56,451 in the previous version of this review). The 73 studies were conducted in 29 countries. Results of the analyses continue to confirm that all forms of extra support analyzed together showed a decrease in cessation of 'any breastfeeding', which includes partial and exclusive breastfeeding (average risk ratio (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 51 studies) and for stopping breastfeeding before four to six weeks (average RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 33 studies). All forms of extra support together also showed a decrease in cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at six months (average RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; moderate-quality evidence, 46 studies) and at four to six weeks (average RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89; moderate quality, 32 studies). We downgraded evidence to moderate-quality due to very high heterogeneity.We investigated substantial heterogeneity for all four outcomes with subgroup analyses for the following covariates: who delivered care, type of support, timing of support, background breastfeeding rate and number of postnatal contacts. Covariates were not able to explain heterogeneity in general. Though the interaction tests were significant for some analyses, we advise caution in the interpretation of results for subgroups due to the heterogeneity. Extra support by both lay and professionals had a positive impact on breastfeeding outcomes. Several factors may have also improved results for women practising exclusive breastfeeding, such as interventions delivered with a face-to-face component, high background initiation rates of breastfeeding, lay support, and a specific schedule of four to eight contacts. However, because within-group heterogeneity remained high for all of these analyses, we advise caution when making specific conclusions based on subgroup results. We noted no evidence for subgroup differences for the any breastfeeding outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS When breastfeeding support is offered to women, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased. Characteristics of effective support include: that it is offered as standard by trained personnel during antenatal or postnatal care, that it includes ongoing scheduled visits so that women can predict when support will be available, and that it is tailored to the setting and the needs of the population group. Support is likely to be more effective in settings with high initiation rates. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Strategies that rely mainly on face-to-face support are more likely to succeed with women practising exclusive breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison McFadden
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Anna Gavine
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Mary J Renfrew
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Angela Wade
- Institute of Child HealthCentre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics30 Guilford StLondonUKWC1N 1 EH
| | | | | | - Emma Veitch
- Breastfeeding NetworkPaisleyRenfrewshireUKPA2 8YB
| | - Anne Marie Rennie
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Maternity HospitalCornhill RoadAberdeenUKAB25 2ZL
| | - Susan A Crowther
- Robert Gordon UniversityFaculty of Health and Social Care, School of Nursing and MidwiferyGarthdee RoadAberdeenUKAB10 7AQ
| | - Sara Neiman
- Breastfeeding NetworkPaisleyRenfrewshireUKPA2 8YB
| | - Stephen MacGillivray
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Balogun OO, O'Sullivan EJ, McFadden A, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, Renfrew MJ, MacGillivray S. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11:CD001688. [PMID: 27827515 PMCID: PMC6464788 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001688.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high-income countries, particularly among women in lower-income groups. In low- and middle-income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES To identify and describe health promotion activities intended to increase the initiation rate of breastfeeding.To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding.To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding early (within one hour after birth). SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and scanned reference lists of all articles obtained. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of any breastfeeding promotion intervention in any population group, except women and infants with a specific health problem. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial reports for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and a third review author was involved when necessary. We contacted investigators to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS Twenty-eight trials involving 107,362 women in seven countries are included in this updated review. Five studies involving 3,124 women did not contribute outcome data and we excluded them from the analyses. The methodological quality of the included trials was mixed, with significant numbers of studies at high or unclear risk of bias due to: inadequate allocation concealment (N = 20); lack of blinding of outcome assessment (N = 20); incomplete outcome data (N = 19); selective reporting (N = 22) and bias from other potential sources (N = 17). Healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care The studies pooled here compare professional health workers delivering breastfeeding education and support during the prenatal and postpartum periods with standard care. Interventions included promotion campaigns and counselling, and all took place in a formal setting. There was evidence from five trials involving 564 women for improved rates ofbreastfeeding initiation among women who received healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and support (average risk ratio (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.92; Tau² = 0.07, I² = 62%, low-quality evidence) compared to those women who received standard care. We downgraded evidence due to design limitations and heterogeneity. The outcome of early initiation of breastfeeding was not reported in the studies under this comparison. Non-healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care There was evidence from eight trials of 5712 women for improved rates of breastfeeding initiation among women who received interventions from non-healthcare professional counsellors and support groups (average RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; Tau² = 0.02, I² = 86%, low-quality evidence) compared to women who received standard care. In three trials of 76,373 women, there was no clear difference between groups in terms of the number of women practicing early initiation of breastfeeding (average RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.95; Tau² = 0.18, I² = 78%, very low-quality evidence). We downgraded the evidence for a combination of design limitations, heterogeneity and imprecision (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect). Other comparisonsOther comparisons in this review also looked at the rates of initiation of breastfeeding and there were no clear differences between groups for the following comparisons of combined healthcare professional-led education with peer support or community educator versus standard care (2 studies, 1371 women) or attention control (1 study, 237 women), breastfeeding education using multimedia (a self-help manual or a video) versus routine care (2 studies, 497 women); early mother-infant contact versus standard care (2 studies, 309 women); and community-based breastfeeding groups versus no breastfeeding groups (1 study, 18,603 women). None of these comparisons reported data on early initiation of breastfeeding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found low-quality evidence that healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and non-healthcare professional-led counselling and peer support interventions can result in some improvements in the number of women beginning to breastfeed. The majority of the trials were conducted in the USA, among women on low incomes and who varied in ethnicity and feeding intention, thus limiting the generalisability of these results to other settings.Future studies would ideally be conducted in a range of low- and high-income settings, with data on breastfeeding rates over various timeframes, and explore the effectiveness of interventions that are initiated prior to conception or during pregnancy. These might include well-described interventions, including health education, early and continuing mother-infant contact, and initiatives to help mothers overcome societal barriers to breastfeeding, all with clearly defined outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olukunmi O Balogun
- National Center for Child Health and DevelopmentDepartment of Health Policy2‐10‐1 Okura, SetagayaTokyoTokyoJapan157‐8535
| | | | - Alison McFadden
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Erika Ota
- St. Luke's International University, Graduate School of Nursing SciencesGlobal Health Nursing10‐1 Akashi‐choChuo‐KuTokyoJapan104‐0044
| | - Anna Gavine
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR)11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Christine D Garner
- Cornell UniversityDivision of Nutritional Sciences244 Garden AvenueIthacaNYUSA14853
| | - Mary J Renfrew
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Stephen MacGillivray
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR)11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sinha B, Chowdhury R, Sankar MJ, Martines J, Taneja S, Mazumder S, Rollins N, Bahl R, Bhandari N. Interventions to improve breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr 2015; 104:114-34. [PMID: 26183031 DOI: 10.1111/apa.13127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 206] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To provide comprehensive evidence of the effect of interventions on early initiation, exclusive, continued and any breastfeeding rates when delivered in five settings: (i) Health systems and services (ii) Home and family environment (iii) Community environment (iv) Work environment (v) Policy environment or a combination of any of above. METHODS Of 23977 titles identified through a systematic literature search in PUBMED, Cochrane and CABI, 195 articles relevant to our objective, were included. We reported the pooled relative risk and corresponding 95% confidence intervals as our outcome estimate. In cases of high heterogeneity, we explored its causes by subgroup analysis and meta-regression and applied random effects model. RESULTS Intervention delivery in combination of settings seemed to have higher improvements in breastfeeding rates. Greatest improvements in early initiation of breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding and continued breastfeeding rates, were seen when counselling or education were provided concurrently in home and community, health systems and community, health systems and home settings, respectively. Baby friendly hospital support at health system was the most effective intervention to improve rates of any breastfeeding. CONCLUSION To promote breastfeeding, interventions should be delivered in a combination of settings by involving health systems, home and family and the community environment concurrently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bireshwar Sinha
- Centre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies; New Delhi India
| | - Ranadip Chowdhury
- Centre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies; New Delhi India
| | - M Jeeva Sankar
- Department of Pediatrics; Newborn Health Knowledge Centre; ICMR Center for Advanced Research in Newborn Health; All India Institute of Medical Sciences; New Delhi India
| | - Jose Martines
- Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health; Centre for International Health; University of Bergen; Bergen Norway
| | - Sunita Taneja
- Centre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies; New Delhi India
| | - Sarmila Mazumder
- Centre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies; New Delhi India
| | - Nigel Rollins
- Department of Maternal; Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health; World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - Rajiv Bahl
- Department of Maternal; Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health; World Health Organization; Geneva Switzerland
| | - Nita Bhandari
- Centre for Health Research and Development, Society for Applied Studies; New Delhi India
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
[Hospital practices and breastfeeding cessation risk within 6 months of delivery]. Arch Pediatr 2015; 22:924-31. [PMID: 26231320 DOI: 10.1016/j.arcped.2015.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Revised: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of maternity ward practices on breastfeeding duration remains uncertain in France. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether compliance with an increasing number of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative recommended practices was associated with a decreasing risk for breastfeeding cessation within 6 months of delivery. METHODS We analyzed the original data from a prospective cohort study carried out in eight maternity centers in France in 2005-2006. A pediatrician or a midwife prospectively collected data on breastfeeding initiation within 1h of birth, rooming-in 24h a day, pacifier non-use, and giving breast milk only for 908 mothers who were breastfeeding at discharge. RESULTS Overall, 315 (34.7%), 309 (34.0%), 186 (20.5%), and 98 (10.8%) mothers experienced 4, 3, 2, or 0-1 maternity ward practices. The median breastfeeding duration was 18 weeks (25th-75th percentiles, 9 to >26), with 87.6% and 31.5% of mothers who were still breastfeeding by 4 and 26 weeks after delivery, respectively. After adjusting for study center and baseline characteristics, the hazard ratios of breastfeeding cessation associated with 3, 2, and 0-1 practices were 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.64), 1.54 (95% CI, 1.20-1.98), and 1.59 (95% CI, 1.13-2.25) as compared with compliance with four practices (p for trend <0.001). CONCLUSION Although the causal interpretation for this relationship remains speculative, these findings support interventions aimed to implement or reinforce Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative recommended practices in order to establish prolonged breastfeeding and decrease the risk for early cessation after discharge to home.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lau Y, Htun TP, Tam WSW, Klainin-Yobas P. Efficacy of e-technologies in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal women: a meta-analysis. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2015; 12:381-401. [PMID: 26194599 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
A growing line of research has highlighted that e-technologies may play a promising role in improving breastfeeding outcomes. The objective of this review was to synthesise the best of available evidence by conducting a meta-analysis to evaluate whether e-technologies have had any effect in improving breastfeeding outcomes among perinatal women. The review was conducted using nine electronic databases to search for English-language research studies from 2007 to 2014. A 'risk of bias' table was used to assess methodological quality. Meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan software. The Q test and I(2) test was used to assess the heterogeneity. The test of overall effect was assessed using z-statistics at P < 0.05. Of 1842 studies identified through electronic searches and reference lists, 16 experimental studies were selected after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Half of the selected studies had a low risk of bias, from which a total of 5505 women in six countries in these studies were included. Meta-analyses revealed that e-technologies significantly improved exclusive breastfeeding initiation (z = 6.90, P < 0.00001), exclusive breastfeeding at 4 weeks (z = 2.12, P = 0.03) and 6 months (z = 3.2, P = 0.001), breastfeeding attitude (z = 3.01, P = 0.003) and breastfeeding knowledge (z = 4.54, P = < 0.00001) in subgroup analyses. This review provides support for the development of web-based, texting messaging, compact disc read-only memory, electronic prompts and interactive computer agent interventions for promoting and supporting breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Lau
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tha P Htun
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wai S W Tam
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Piyanee Klainin-Yobas
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raskovalova T, Teasley SL, Gelbert-Baudino N, Mauri PA, Schelstraete C, Massoutier M, Berger M, François P, Labarère J. Breastfeeding Assessment Score: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015; 135:e1276-85. [PMID: 25869379 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-3072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have revealed conflicting results for the Breastfeeding Assessment Score (BAS) in predicting early breastfeeding cessation. Our objective was to externally validate the BAS and provide summary accuracy estimates for this clinical prediction model. METHODS We used the original data from a prospective cohort study. Additional studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane) from 2002 to 2013 and contacting research groups that had derived or validated the BAS. Prospective cohort studies were eligible if the BAS was computed at baseline and mothers were followed up for breastfeeding cessation. Two physicians extracted relevant information and independently assessed the methodological quality for the included studies. RESULTS In the external validation cohort, 22 of 424 mothers (5.2%) discontinued breastfeeding within 14 days of infant age. The BAS predicted early breastfeeding cessation with an area under the curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.74) and inadequate calibration. When restricting the meta-analysis to 3169 mother-infant pairs enrolled in 4 higher-quality studies, a BAS value <8 predicted early cessation with 0.80 sensitivity (95% CI: 0.69 to 0.91) and 0.51 specificity (95% CI: 0.32 to 0.70) summary estimates. CONCLUSIONS Substantial between-study heterogeneity limited the interpretation of summary accuracy estimates. The BAS predicts early breastfeeding cessation with moderate accuracy, although local recalibration is advised before implementation. Further study is warranted to determine whether the BAS can help pediatricians in identifying mother-infant pairs that may benefit from more extensive breastfeeding assessment and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Berger
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Patrice François
- University Hospital, Grenoble, France; and Techniques de l'Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité - Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications, Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| | - José Labarère
- University Hospital, Grenoble, France; and Techniques de l'Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité - Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications, Grenoble, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Joseph Fourier-Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sutton C. Developing and evaluating complex interventions. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION 2014; 10:163-5. [PMID: 24661462 DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Sutton
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health, University of Central Lancashire.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Haroon S, Das JK, Salam RA, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013; 13 Suppl 3:S20. [PMID: 24564836 PMCID: PMC3847366 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-s3-s20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 220] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) rates remain low in both low-income and high-income countries despite World Health Organization recommendations for EBF till 6 months. Breastfeeding has been shown to have a protective effect against gastrointestinal infections, among other benefits. Large-scale interventions focusing on educating mothers about breastfeeding have the potential to increase breastfeeding prevalence, especially EBF, up to recommended standards and also to decrease infant morbidity. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted for RCTs and quasi-experimental studies comparing breastfeeding education or support to routine care. The effect of interventions was observed for exclusive, predominant, partial and no breastfeeding rates. The time intervals of interest were day 1, <1 month, and 1 to 5 months. Outcome-specific evidence was graded according to the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) rules using the adapted Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria and recommendations were made from studies in developing countries for inclusion into the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model. Results After reviewing 4600 abstracts, 372 studies were selected for full text screening and 110 of these studies were finally included. Statistically significant increases in EBF rates as a result of breastfeeding promotion interventions were observed: 43% at day 1, 30% at <1 month, and 90% at 1-5 months. Rates of ‘no breastfeeding’ reduced by 32% at 1 day, 30% at <1 month, and 18% at 1-5 months. The effect of interventions on the rates of predominant and partial breastfeeding were non-significant. Conclusion Breastfeeding education and/or support increased EBF rates and decreased no breastfeeding rates at birth, <1 month and 1-5 months. Combined individual and group counseling appeared to be superior to individual or group counseling alone. Interventions in developing countries had a greater impact than those in developed countries.
Collapse
|
17
|
Haroon S, Das JK, Salam RA, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Breastfeeding promotion interventions and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2013. [PMID: 24564836 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13s3-s29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) rates remain low in both low-income and high-income countries despite World Health Organization recommendations for EBF till 6 months. Breastfeeding has been shown to have a protective effect against gastrointestinal infections, among other benefits. Large-scale interventions focusing on educating mothers about breastfeeding have the potential to increase breastfeeding prevalence, especially EBF, up to recommended standards and also to decrease infant morbidity. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted for RCTs and quasi-experimental studies comparing breastfeeding education or support to routine care. The effect of interventions was observed for exclusive, predominant, partial and no breastfeeding rates. The time intervals of interest were day 1, <1 month, and 1 to 5 months. Outcome-specific evidence was graded according to the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) rules using the adapted Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria and recommendations were made from studies in developing countries for inclusion into the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) model. RESULTS After reviewing 4600 abstracts, 372 studies were selected for full text screening and 110 of these studies were finally included. Statistically significant increases in EBF rates as a result of breastfeeding promotion interventions were observed: 43% at day 1, 30% at <1 month, and 90% at 1-5 months. Rates of 'no breastfeeding' reduced by 32% at 1 day, 30% at <1 month, and 18% at 1-5 months. The effect of interventions on the rates of predominant and partial breastfeeding were non-significant. CONCLUSION Breastfeeding education and/or support increased EBF rates and decreased no breastfeeding rates at birth, <1 month and 1-5 months. Combined individual and group counseling appeared to be superior to individual or group counseling alone. Interventions in developing countries had a greater impact than those in developed countries.
Collapse
|
18
|
Labarère J, Gelbert-Baudino N, Laborde L, Baudino F, Durand M, Schelstraete C, François P. Determinants of 6-month maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding experience in a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Hum Lact 2012; 28:203-10. [PMID: 22344778 DOI: 10.1177/0890334411429114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Although a personally defined experience, successful breastfeeding is usually measured with regard to duration. This study investigated the determinants of maternal satisfaction with breastfeeding experience for 907 mothers enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Despite a median breastfeeding duration (18 weeks) that fell short of recommendations, 822 mothers (90.6%) rated their breastfeeding experience as very or fairly satisfactory. Anticipated breastfeeding duration was a determinant of satisfaction only for women who actually breastfeed < 2 months; in this subgroup of mothers, satisfaction rates ranged from 84.6% for those who anticipated breastfeeding < 2 months to 69.8% for those who anticipated breastfeeding > 4 months (P = .01). Smoking during pregnancy and experiencing breastfeeding difficulties after discharge were independently associated with decreased satisfaction. Eliciting the mother's expectations regarding breastfeeding duration may help the lactation consultant in providing appropriate guidance. Future studies should assess maternal satisfaction using validated instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Labarère
- Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|