Further Validation of “Timed Up and Go” in Stroke Patients

Effects of community-based fall prevention interventions for older adults using information and communication technology: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of fall prevention interventions using information and communication technology (ICT). Methods: A comprehensive search across four databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were fall prevention interventions including telehealth, computerized balance training, exergaming, mobile application education, virtual reality exercise, and cognitive-behavioral training for community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years. Results: Thirty-four studies were selected. Telehealth, smart home systems, and exergames reduced the risk of falls (RR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.54, 0.75]). Telehealth and exergame improved balance (MD = 3.30, 95% CI [1.91, 4.68]; MD = 4.40, 95% CI [3.09, 5.71]). Telehealth improved physical function (SMD = 0.69, 95% CI [0.23, 1.16]). Overall, ICT fall interventions improved fall efficacy but not cognitive function. For quality of life (QOL), mixed results were found depending on the assessment tools. Conclusion: Future investigations on telehealth, smart home systems, or exergames are needed to motivate older adults to exercise and prevent falls.

Test-Retest Reliability of the Timed Up and Go Test in Subjects with Parkinson's Disease: Implications for Longitudinal Assessments

BACKGROUND

Despite the frequent use of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test in clinical trials, evaluation of longitudinal test-retest reliability is generally lacking and still inconclusive for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to further investigate long-term reliability and sensitivity of the TUG test among this population. Furthermore, we explored alternative assessment strategies of the test aimed at elucidating whether the inclusion or combination of timed trials may have potential implications on outcome measure.

METHODS

Relative and absolute reliability of the TUG performance were obtained in forty-three subjects with PD over three timed trials in two different testing sessions separated by a two-months period.

RESULTS

Our results reported excellent intra-session and moderate inter-session reliability coefficients. The use of different assessment strategies of the TUG was found to have an important impact on outcome measure, highlighting the averaging of several timed trials in each testing session as a recommended alternative to minimize measurement error and increase reliability in longitudinal assessments. Nevertheless, beyond acceptable reliability, poor trial-to-trial stability of the measure appears to exist, since the ranges of expected variability upon retesting were wide and the incidence of spurious statistical effects was not negligible, especially in longitudinal repeated testing.

CONCLUSION

Limitations may exist in the interpretation of the TUG outputs as part of longitudinal assessments aimed at evaluating treatment effectiveness in PD population. Researchers and practitioners should be aware of these concerns to prevent possible misrepresentations of functional ability in patients for a particular intervention.

The reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go as a clinical tool in individuals with and without disabilities across a lifespan: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To summarize the available literature related to reliability and validity of the Timed Up and Go in typical adults and children, and individuals diagnosed with the following pathologies: Huntington's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, Down syndrome, or cerebral palsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search was conducted using MeSH terms and keywords through a variety of databases. Data regarding reliability and validity were synthesized.

RESULTS

This review included 77 articles. Results were variable depending on the studied population. The Timed Up and Go showed excellent reliability in typical adults, in individuals with cerebral palsy, in individuals with multiple sclerosis, in individuals with Huntington's disease, individuals with a stroke, and individuals with a spinal cord injury. The TUG demonstrated strong concurrent validity for individuals with stroke and spinal cord injury. Predictive validity data was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the literature assessed, the Timed Up and Go is clinically applicable and reliable across multiple populations. The Timed Up and Go has a wide variety of clinical use making it a diverse measure that should be considered when choosing an outcome an activity based outcome measure. However, there are some limitations in the validity of the utilization of the Timed Up and Go to some populations due to a lack of data and/or poor choice of comparison outcome measures when assessing validity. Additional research is needed for young to middle aged adults.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONOutcome measures are a vital component of clinical practice across all populations.The Timed Up and Go is a highly studied outcome measure in the geriatric population, but lacks research of its applicability to other populations.This study was able to highlight the clinical utility of the Timed Up and Go in populations that under utilize this outcome measure.

Standardized Walking Obstacle Course (SWOC): reliability and validity of a new functional measurement tool for children

PURPOSE

This study reports reliability of the Standardized Walking Obstacle Course (SWOC) and concurrent validity with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) for use in children with and without developmental disabilities.

METHODS

Seventy-three children completed the SWOC and TUG during each of two sessions scheduled one week apart. Two raters took measures of time and number of steps on the SWOC to correlate with the same measures on the TUG.

RESULTS

Very high interrater reliabilities for time (intercorrelation coefficient [ICC] 0.99) and number of steps (ICC 0.94-0.99) noted. High intrarater reliabilities recorded for time (ICC 0.83-0.97) and number of steps (ICC 0.84-0.96). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) between the TUG and SWOC were moderate to very high for time (r = 0.72-0.90) and number of steps (r = 0.63-0.92).

CONCLUSION

The SWOC demonstrates good reliability within and between raters and concurrent validity with the TUG for use with children to establish their functional ambulation capability. The SWOC could easily be used in any setting for any child who can follow the directions and walk without an assistive device. Further testing is needed of the use of the SWOC to detect change and measure the extent of the environment's influence on activity and participation for different populations of children.