Problem solved: erectile dysfunction (ED) = early death (ED)

The erectile dysfunction as a marker of cardiovascular disease: a review

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are two conditions that often coexist. Both diseases are consequences of the systemic vascular disease, sharing common risk factors, like diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, smoking, obesity, dyslipidaemia. Furthermore, they share the same pathological basis, endothelial dysfunction. Symptoms of ED precede with three to five years the clinical manifestations of CVD. This period may be a window of opportunity for the early initiation of a prompt therapeutic action for cardiovascular risk factors. This article reviews the incidence and prevalence of CVD and ED, the common risk factors, the pathophysiological link between the two diseases, and the current diagnosis and management strategies of patients with CVD and ED, in order to prevent myocardial infarction, stroke or heart failure.

Opinions, Attitudes, and Perceptions in Relation to Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation in the Undiagnosed Spanish Male Population. Results of the PANDORA Project

BACKGROUND

Approximately 43% of Spanish men report experiencing premature ejaculation (PE) at some point in their lives and 12.1% suffer from erectile dysfunction (ED), of whom only 16.5% have seen a doctor. Despite this, ED and PE remain undiagnosed among a supposedly healthy segment of the population.

AIM

To assess the general knowledge of a representative population of healthy Spanish males of the symptoms, treatment, and expectations related to ED and PE.

METHODS

This was a descriptive study based on an online questionnaire in which 2,515 males aged 25-75 years with no history of ED and/or PE presented their perception of aspects related to symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and expectations in ED and PE.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The study provided an evaluation of the knowledge, attitude, and underdiagnosis of ED and/or PE in healthy males and the approach taken by urology specialists and other disciplines.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 2,515 healthy males, including over 80% of those who had completed secondary or higher education. 60% of the sample had never seen a urologist and 59% and 62% of the participating men responded correctly to the statements about PE and ED, respectively. Their lack of knowledge of the therapeutic alternatives was clear (74% and 76% of the panel were unaware of the existence of effective treatments for ED and PE, respectively). Despite the initiative shown by some participants in seeking information about each condition (10.3% for ED; 16.7% for PE), only 4.7% of them had been questioned about ED by a medical practitioner (1.9% for PE). The underdiagnosis rate stood at 3.5% for ED (5.6% participants >65 years) and at about 10% for PE.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These results will represent a point of departure for establishing some recommendations to improve the detection and treatment of these disorders.

STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS

This is the first study of its kind in Spain to analyze the underdiagnosis of ED and/or PE inferred from data reported by a population of healthy males. Screening for ED was performed with a validated questionnaire. However, the rest of the research was conducted using adaptations of validated questionnaires or a self-designed questionnaire based on and in consultation with a group of experienced andrologists.

CONCLUSION

People need to have greater knowledge of both the conditions and the related false myths to make sure that they are familiar with the existence of drug treatments and socio-sanitary interventions. Primary care physicians and urologists should also be more proactive in routine visits in order to achieve better management of ED and PE. Prieto-Castro R, Puigvert-Martínez AM, Artigas-Feliu R, et al. Opinions, Attitudes, and Perceptions in Relation to Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation in the Undiagnosed Spanish Male Population. Results of the PANDORA Project. J Sex Med 2020;17:1495-1508.

Pharmaco-écho-doppler pénien: méthodologie, critères diagnostiques et indications actuelles dans l’exploration d’une dysfonction érectile

La dysfonction érectile (DE) est une pathologie multifactorielle fréquente, dont l’origine organique ou mixte est considérée actuellement comme dominante chez l’homme après 50 ans. La plupart des DE vasculotissulaires sont liées à une dysfonction endothéliale, en relation avec les principaux facteurs de risque cardiovasculaires (FRCV). La DE représente un indicateur de la santé vasculaire en général. Elle est aussi prédictive d’événements cardiovasculaires (ECV), notamment de coronaropathies. Elle a également été associée aux artériopathies des membres inférieurs et aux accidents vasculaires cérébraux. Le pharmaco-écho-doppler pénien (PEDP) est un examen assez peu utilisé aujourd’hui dans la prise en charge d’une DE, la recherche étiologique n’étant encore le plus souvent pas considérée comme nécessaire à la prise en charge thérapeutique, mais également en raison de l’absence de standardisation. Cependant, de nombreuses publications ont mis récemment en évidence que l’origine vasculotissulaire d’une DE, établie sur des critères vélocimétriques enregistrés après injection intracaverneuse (IIC) de substances vasoactives, renforçait la valeur prédictive de la DE concernant les événements et la mortalité cardiovasculaires (CV), justifiant un intérêt accru pour réaliser cet examen.