Examining factors that influence the adoption of health-promoting behaviours among people with venous disease

Patient Explanation of Adherence and Non-Adherence to Venous Leg Ulcer Treatment: A Qualitative Study

The aim of this study was to understand which factors influence patients’ adherence to venous leg ulcer treatment recommendations in primary care. We adopted a qualitative study design, conducting phone interviews with 31 people with venous leg ulcers in Melbourne, Australia. We conducted 31 semi-structured phone interviews between October and December 2019 with patients with clinically diagnosed venous leg ulcers. Participants recruited to the Aspirin in Venous Leg Ulcer Randomized Control Trial and Cohort study were invited to participate in a qualitative study, which was nested under this trial. We applied the Theoretical Domains Framework to guide the data analysis. The following factors influenced patients’ adherence to venous leg ulcer treatment: understanding the management plan and rationale behind treatment (Knowledge Domain); compression-related body image issues (Social Influences); understanding consequences of not wearing compression (Beliefs about Consequences); feeling overwhelmed because it’s not getting better (Emotions); hot weather and discomfort when wearing compression (Environmental Context and Resources); cost of compression (Environmental Context and Resources); ability to wear compression (Beliefs about Capabilities); patience and persistence (Behavioral Regulation); and remembering self-care instructions (Memory, Attention and Decision Making). The Theoretical Domains Framework was useful for identifying factors that influence patients’ adherence to treatment recommendations for venous leg ulcers management. These factors may inform development of novel interventions to optimize shared decision making and self-care to improve healing outcomes. The findings from this article will be relevant to clinicians involved in management of patients with venous leg ulcers, as their support is crucial to patients’ treatment adherence. Consultation with patients about VLU treatment adherence is an opportunity for clinical practice to be targeted and collaborative. This process may inform guideline development.

Patient experiences of living with chronic leg ulcers and making the decision to seek professional health-care

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to elucidate how patients experience living with chronic leg ulcers before consulting a health professional, and to determine the reasons behind the decision to visit a health-care centre.

METHOD:

A qualitative interview study was carried out. There were 11 participants, five men and six women (age range: 27-83 years old). All participants in the study were patients visiting the public primary medical centre in western Sweden for the first time for a chronic leg ulcer. The data was obtained by recorded interviews. Systematic text condensation (STC) by Malterud was applied to the analysis.

RESULTS:

The analysis identified five main categories of the issues relating to ulcers to their ulcers: convictions, pain, emotions, strategies, and health-care treatment. At first, patients accepted the inconvenience of a leg ulcer. Gradually, they focused more on strategies dealing with the ulcer, and withdrew from their social context, while their fears increased. Many needed support in the decision to seek professional care.

CONCLUSION:

Despite pain, anxiety, emotional lability, and disappointment, they had strategies to cope with ulcers on their own. A social network seems crucial for the decision to seek professional health care and greater knowledge of leg ulcers, particularly in the elderly population, is needed.

How and why patients self-treat chronic wounds

The aim of this study was to investigate how people self-treat chronic wounds, why they self-treat and the assistance and support that they receive. The increasing emphasis on self-management of chronic conditions, the potential benefits of self-treatment to the health care consumer and competing demands on health care funding are good reasons to investigate self-treatment of chronic wounds as we have little data on this group of individuals. A survey study was conducted in Australia. A non-random sample of 100 participants was recruited. Participants were aged 18 years or older and currently or previously had a chronic wound that they self-treated. All participants completed one survey. Data analysis involved descriptive statistics. The sample was, on average, 64·6 years of age; half was female (n = 50, 50%), and the majority had a lower leg wound (n = 80, 80·0%). The sample scored 33·9/40 on the Generalized Self-efficacy Scale and 68/100 on the Medical Outcomes Social Support Scale. The majority of the 89 participants who used a wound dressing used a product that targeted bacteria (n = 59, 66.3%). The two most commonly selected reasons for self-treating were 'to be independent' (n = 58, 58·0%) and 'to do the treatment at a time that suited' (n = 55, 56·0%). Less than one quarter of participants reported being supervised regularly during the wound episode (n = 22, 22%), and few (n = 6, 6·0%) reported having received education and training to support their self-treatment. Self-treaters of chronic wounds may benefit from standardised education and closer professional supervision to optimise self-treatment practices. Efforts to improve patient satisfaction with professional care are required to promote a shared-care model when self-treating and to optimise patient outcomes.